Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

#SUPER-TERRORIST CONDEMNS LIFE ON THE NEWSGROUPS!!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Susan Williams

unread,
Dec 26, 2002, 6:30:42 PM12/26/02
to
Super-terrorist Ted Seeberg condemned the American Constitution,
liberty and then supported persecution which he claimed is a biblical
mandate. The man is Catholic and has been posting on the newsgroups
in order to offset the idea that the Vatican is still the same in
hating the Constitution and working to destroy Protestantism. All
this he did in the face of the amazing super-criminals who have been
posting against me ever since. Claiming that I am insane as they did
to Brother Ted McMillan, they show constantly that they cannot afford
to ignore me, but constantly hang around to show us that anyone who
has the idea that we must never judge or condemn a person is nuts.
THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE CONSTANTLY TELLING US THIS AND DISOBEYING IT
AT THE SAME TIME. They are obeying the Jesuit Oath: the absolute most
hateful document to be found on the planet earth today. With it being
as hateful, we were supposed to expect these super-criminal servants
of that Oath to tell us that their eyes were hurting just reading that
hateful document. They again give us ideas they never believe,
telling us they cannot graphically condemn the hate in that document
because it is fake. Read the document for yourself because you are
going to have to compare that Oath to the fact that I flooded and
cross-posted on the newsgroups--something that drove these Vatican
infiltrationist super-terrorists out of their beelzebub minds!

http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/jesuit.htm


Watch as I give the evidence here showing that Ted Seeber, a
super-trained child of the Vatican, demonstrates to us that Rome HAS
NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DARK AGES!

=========================

Here is a copy below of Brother Ted's Post proving that Ted Seeber did
condemn all non-Catholics to persecution and death despite these
Vatican infiltrators telling us it isn't so, and some saying they were
not here in the first place while Seeber was posting to know.

But first we must state the fact that Ted Seeber had been constantly
attacking liberty and the American Constitution for years in front of
the super-terroristic noses of all the people swarming around and
posting against me in order to desperately detract and take away the
truth from what I am revealing. For years they did nothing BECAUSE
THEY AGREE WITH TED SEEBER! Now since Seeber made a major blunder by
revealing his complete disrespect for human life, and Brother Ted was
witty enough to expose it, terrorists from everywhere enter to swarm,
accuse and attack him claiming that they have to address some
injustice Brother Ted has done!

Ted Seeber not only argued against liberty and the American
Constitution for a long time, but he also boldly supported
PERSECUTION, claiming that it was biblical before his major mess-up
the fellow super-terrorist demons are doing everything to convince us
didn't happen.

Ted Seeber was falsely claiming that his Vatican operates just like
the Apostles did. So Brother Ted McMillan contradicted that with
questions. First with the mention of the name-call they ususally make
against him (wearing a tinfoil hat), Brother Ted, in asking about the
practices of the Apostles said:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ananias&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=21&as_minm=9&as_miny=2000&as_maxd=21&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2000&selm=Pine.LNX.4.21.0009210929340.25976-100000%40shell1.aracnet.com&rnum=1

> Become a tinfoil hat head for your sake! What was the
> name of the secret orders that infiltrated government and sought for
> power and wealth? [Brother Ted means of the Apostles: what secret orders did the Apostles have and use to infiltrate governments and gather power and wealth. Ted Seeber replies:]

The Apostles.

[Brother Ted now asks:]
> You all have names for your orders here, what names
> did they [The Apostles] come up with? [For their secret orders Seeber claims they had. Seeber replies:]

The Way.

[Now listen closely to what Brother Ted asks the super-criminal:]
> > > If
> > > they didn't agree, Christ's Disciples massacred them?

[WATCH WHAT SEEBER REPLIES:]
> > > > Begining of Acts Chapter 5, yes.

[Brother McMillan, being insensed, cries:]

> > Proof! Proof!

[WATCH WHAT THE SUB-MONSTER REPLIES:]

No tinfoil hat involved, but more to the point:
Acts 5: Acts.5 [1] But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his
wife, sold a possession, [2] And kept back part of the price, his wife
also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the
apostles' feet. [3] But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled
thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the
price of the land? [4] Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and
after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou
conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but
unto God. [5] And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up
the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.
[6] And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and
buried him. [7] And it was about the space of three hours after, when
his wife, not knowing what was done, came in. [8] And Peter answered
unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said,
Yea, for so much. [9] Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have
agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of
them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry
thee out. [10] Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded
up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and,
carrying her forth, buried her by her husband. [11] And great fear
came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things. [12]
And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought
among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon's
porch. [13] And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the
people magnified them. [14] And believers were the more added to the
Lord, multitudes both of men and women.)

[This proves that Ted Seeber condones persecution! This occurred
earlier than the following documented evidence showing that Ted Seeber
has condemned all non-Catholic blood to persecution and death! Here
is that evidence:

Despite the great and furious defense of Super-terrorist Ted Seeber by
Antichrist Nicholas II, Cindy, Vatican scoundrel witch Caillean, Paul
Stooley, Lamarr and the other workers of the Antichrist, Ted Seeber
literally DID condemn all non-Catholics to persecution and death
boldly on the newsgroups within the climate of September 11. It took
place around December 5, 2001 if my memory serves me:

A man by the name of Ted Seeber, has condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death on Decembr 5, 2001 on the newsgroups after he
argued against every vestige of the Constitution, liberty and privacy.
Since that time, strange people even claiming to be non-Catholics have
been attacking me because I exposed what the man has done. They have
portrayed me as mean, "incomprehensible," "evil," and even "not human"
for doing so. We have found that these people are infiltrants from
the Vatican to other non-Catholic religions. Here now again is the
actual conversation and where you can find it posted on the
newsgroups. Here is the evidence every worker for the Antichrist, be
they sabbathkeepers or even witches, have ignored in favor over their
paranoia that uncivil posts are being submitted to the newsgroups.
Being workers for the Antichrist, their solution to this problem was
to submit more uncivil postings:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com

I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:

Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>

Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.

------------------

FREEZE!

In this simple statement, Ted Seeber acknowledges not only that
Catholics have persecuted and killed Protestants, but he states why.
He speaks clearly with approval as if he is expressing an eternal
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!

I, being infuriated, respond:

------------------

Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.

------------------

Ted Seeber was clearly telling the world that people deserve to die or
should even be persecuted and killed if they don't live the bible
according to his standards. My reply to him continues:

------------------

Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!

Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?

Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!

I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!

------------------

What I was saying here was that the Protestants viewed homosexual
behavior as intolerable and abominable. Likely most of the victims of
911 did not view matters that way. Since they likely did not live the
bible according to Seeber's standards, what should be their fate?

So here we see the issues and prove that Rome has not changed. These
statements of Seeber did not just come like a bolt of lightning. This
was the last leg of a series of emotional ramblings between us both as
I was defending human liberty, privacy and the American Constitution
while Seeber was condemning all of these and demanding change under
the false pretext that the terror attacks require a police state for
security. Seeber told us boldly that he works against the
Constitution to change it to be interpreted opposite from what it
currently is under "acceptable confines" from the INSIDE! This is
just what people like Jack Chick WERE SAYING FOLKS!!

Interestingly, although he was even telling us that privacy was
NOWHERE to be found in the American Constitution, go to his website
and you will find something strange. Would you like to have an email
account given to you by Ted Seeber? Well go to his website and you
can get one. What's more is, according to him, IT'S FREE! Want to
get a free email account from a man arguing against basic human
privacy? You go right ahead!

For a long time he was spitting upon the principles of human liberty
as had ALL those brutal regimes that easily took the lives of people
and committed atrocities. He even told me that the current American
system respecting privacy was "increibly stupid" and "outdated." He
told me the current principles were as old as Martin Luther during the
Reformation. When I asked him the date his contrary principles were
created, he behaved just like Antichrist MSiciliana, Cindy, Nicholas
and so many others.

After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
that on the newsgroups directly in the climate of September 11th
fulfilling the stated definition of a terrorist, Ted Seeber ducked out
from dialoguing with me even though he had been trailing my postings
and wrangling with me tit-for-tat.

I then kept raving and raving about what Ted Seeber had said. NONE OF
THE OTHER WORKERS FOR THE ANTICHRIST DARED TO TAKE NOTICE OVER WHAT
TED SEEBER HAD SAID OR DONE. They came to attack me telling me that I
insulted the man, and I therefore was an "incomprehensible" and "evil"
man sending in uncivil postings. Antichrist Lamarr told us that I was
not human as I dared to respect the lives of millions of men, women
and little children who were not just ordinary people, but were the
very saints of God! All of them attacked me taking turns and telling
the world I am the only problem on the newsgroups. Through this we
discover that Rome has not changed. It shows they are not to use the
claim that Ted Seeber was not representing Rome here. His words did
not offend them.

That is why you notice all claims that Seeber did not do what I said
he did, are just a squeak and from among the most unscrupulous of them
all, Antichrist MSiciliana. I have told Antichrist MSiciliana to LET
THE MAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF many times over. The advice sounds logical,
does it NOT? From day one, TED SEEBER COULD NOT DENY WHAT I HAD SAID
ABOUT WHAT HE HAD DONE. FROM DAY ONE HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT MY
CLAIMS AGAINST WHAT HE HAD DONE. He had been posting on the
newsgroups for almost three months afterward and then ducked out at
the end of January.
-
Just like Antichrist MSiciliana was the only one trying to show the
world I taught that Ellen White was the Antichrist, so she is the only
one now trying to babble to us that Ted Seeber did not boldly condemn
the lives of all non-Catholics on the basis of Vatican principle!

Although Antichrist MSiciliana claims that Ted Seeber did not condemn
all non-Catholics, with all my ravings about what was done, she is the
only one unscrupulous enough to claim Seeber did not do it. All the
rest of them acknowledge that he did. The Pope should give Antichrist
MSiciliana an award or elect her the next pope!


In His Grace,


Susan

TA

unread,
Dec 27, 2002, 9:37:30 AM12/27/02
to

"Susan Williams" <salet...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:5s3n0vg73j3ij1ft2...@4ax.com...

...and another raving witless stupid cunt goes into the killfile... <PLONK!>


Susan Williams

unread,
Dec 27, 2002, 10:14:23 AM12/27/02
to
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 14:37:30 GMT, "TA" <toxicav...@hotmail.com>
wrote:


HEY CAILLEAN! HEY BASTARD PSYCHIATRIST JOE MEEHAN! HEY KIKERS! HEY
STEPHEN QUIST!

TO ALL SUPER-DAMNED ANTICHRIST USTASHIS!

GET A LOAD OF THE NAME-CALLING AND HATE HERE! NO EVIDENCE! NO
DISCUSSION!

OH! YOU HAVE ALREADY CONDEMNED IT!!!

In His Grace,


Susan
>

0 new messages