Pole whift.. Maby It could be...
The Warning
Ok.. I read on a web site.. (I can`t remember
exactly so if someone know post me back the adresse)
I read that the China as done a nuclear Test since a couple
of year and all arround the world.. all nation have
seen a variation (like a heartquake) on a machine..
I found this weird and I want to look againt at this site..
I heard that maby somebody could make a new weapons.. this
weapons is not a bomb.. It`s a machine to do
earthquake.
If we have a big earthquake.. maby the pole shift
could happend in a minute..!! No..??
JHo...@nospammail.cyberramp.net
Are you thinking of the HAARP project? I believe there are web sites
about it. I'm sorry, I don't know the URL, but do a search for HAARP,
and you'll find it.
Helen
Greg Marcus
The dipolar magnetic field around the earth is a result of the high
pressure reactions of the earth's molten and plasma core, the spinning of
this core, and the crust of the earth. Period.
if something happens, oh.. like the CRUST sliding, LOOSE, over the core,
whether it is slight or tremendous, it will have an affect on said field.
I suggest you read the work of Hapsgood (Charles or George.. don't rote
memorize, sorry). Einstein was onside with him.
You can find this discussed in great detail in the books "Fingerprints of
the Gods" by Graham Hancock, and "The Day the Sky fell".
And then compare it to Rev. Where it talks about the "stars falling" and
no piece of land being in the same place it was before. It's mentioned
again later on as "The millstone".. Read these books and it will be clear.
"The Warning" (Ha...@nice.day) writes:
> Ok.. I read on a web site.. (I can`t remember
> exactly so if someone know post me back the adresse)
>
> I read that the China as done a nuclear Test since a couple
> of year and all arround the world.. all nation have
> seen a variation (like a heartquake) on a machine..
>
> I found this weird and I want to look againt at this site..
> I heard that maby somebody could make a new weapons.. this
> weapons is not a bomb.. It`s a machine to do
> earthquake.
>
> If we have a big earthquake.. maby the pole shift
> could happend in a minute..!! No..??
--
Greg Marcus * When you believe in things you don't understand,
Ottawa, ON * then you suffer. Superstition ain't the way.
Canada * - Stevie Wonder
pics.com
JHo...@nospammail.cyberramp.net writes: > The Warning wrote:
> >
> > Ok.. I read on a web site.. (I can`t remember
> > exactly so if someone know post me back the adresse)
> >
> > I read that the China as done a nuclear Test since a couple
> > of year and all arround the world.. all nation have
> > seen a variation (like a heartquake) on a machine..
> >
> > I found this weird and I want to look againt at this site..
> > I heard that maby somebody could make a new weapons.. this
> > weapons is not a bomb.. It`s a machine to do
> > earthquake.
> >
> > If we have a big earthquake.. maby the pole shift
> > could happend in a minute..!! No..??
>
>
> about it. I'm sorry, I don't know the URL, but do a search for HAARP,
> and you'll find it.
>
> Helen
Also, nospammail? I remember hearing several years ago of Soviet
(yes, THAT long ago!) project involving causing earthquakes by using
some form of ultra-sonic systems, I forget where I saw it, I think
maybe a book... hope this helps FreedomRider rle...@pics.com
Jean Guernon
Sorry if I use this to in fact talk about another post...
This is exact. But it doesn't explain why some people still believe that the
HAARP project could trigger earthquake... HAARP can certainly destroy a lot
through local climate change (if military application is considered, but to
disrupt those pressures take a lot more as all the (serious) site will
somewhat point out. Of course, nuclear detonation do have some disrupting
effect to a certain extent in localized area, but, precisely because these can
(well could since from now on they will be banned) only be undertook in
sovereign country and could only hurt the said country and only if there are
already areas that have some imbalanced tectonic plates I think...
Anyway, the question is how on earth can HAARP be applied. Even according to
what's below, it would, if there could be an output as powerful as some
significant part of the mass of the earth, in fact disrupt the whole planet,
not localized area... So it's not really practical even if it was somewhat
feasible...
Or am I missing something?
J.
Greg Marcus wrote:
> The dipolar magnetic field around the earth is a result of the high
> pressure reactions of the earth's molten and plasma core, the spinning of
> this core, and the crust of the earth. Period.
>
> if something happens, oh.. like the CRUST sliding, LOOSE, over the core,
> whether it is slight or tremendous, it will have an affect on said field.
>
> I suggest you read the work of Hapsgood (Charles or George.. don't rote
> memorize, sorry). Einstein was onside with him.
>
> You can find this discussed in great detail in the books "Fingerprints of
> the Gods" by Graham Hancock, and "The Day the Sky fell".
>
> And then compare it to Rev. Where it talks about the "stars falling" and
> no piece of land being in the same place it was before. It's mentioned
> again later on as "The millstone".. Read these books and it will be clear.
>
> "The Warning" (Ha...@nice.day) writes:
> > Ok.. I read on a web site.. (I can`t remember
> > exactly so if someone know post me back the adresse)
> >
> > I read that the China as done a nuclear Test since a couple
> > of year and all arround the world.. all nation have
> > seen a variation (like a heartquake) on a machine..
> >
> > I found this weird and I want to look againt at this site..
> > I heard that maby somebody could make a new weapons.. this
> > weapons is not a bomb.. It`s a machine to do
> > earthquake.
> >
> > If we have a big earthquake.. maby the pole shift
> > could happend in a minute..!! No..??
>
Greg Marcus
Okay. Let me say that this whole Earth-crust displacement thing was
released on newswire last year.. can't remember which service carried it,
but it was in the Ottawa citizen. No mention of Hapsgood's work in the 50s
or whenever.. acted like it was new.
This displacemnet happens because, more or less, of built up force.
accumaltive stress. If they are working on, or have earthquake technology,
I bet they are trying to relieve some of this stress. To lessen the
damage.
I'm more interested in what might happen in the field around the earth
disappears for awhile, or becomes unstable. Our brain works with such
fields.. we evolved within the field of the earth. The whole universe is a
web of these fields.. micro, macro.. fields within fields.. I wonder what
happens to us if it's gone.
*DrPostman
ah...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Greg Marcus) wrote:
>
>The dipolar magnetic field around the earth is a result of the high
>pressure reactions of the earth's molten and plasma core, the spinning of
>this core, and the crust of the earth. Period.
>
>if something happens, oh.. like the CRUST sliding, LOOSE, over the core,
>whether it is slight or tremendous, it will have an affect on said field.
There is not the slightest bit of information that this will or has ever
happened - plate tectonics argues against this.
>
>I suggest you read the work of Hapsgood (Charles or George.. don't rote
>memorize, sorry). Einstein was onside with him.
Einstein didn't know about plate tectonics when he wrote that he
didn't disagree with the model - If he did there is no way he would
have agreed with him - the quote from Einstein comes from the early
50's when folks had a different idea of how the earth worked.
>
>You can find this discussed in great detail in the books "Fingerprints of
>the Gods" by Graham Hancock, and "The Day the Sky fell".
And then go to this web site and see how these theories are nothing
more than wild speculation:
http://www.intersurf.com/~heinrich/wildside.html
>And then compare it to Rev. Where it talks about the "stars falling" and
>no piece of land being in the same place it was before. It's mentioned
>again later on as "The millstone".. Read these books and it will be clear.
About as clear as mud. This is just another example of Junk Science.
Here is another web site to check out:
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html
The idea of crustal displacement was replaced with knowledge of plate
tectonics which came as a result of mapping the ocean floor in the mid
1960's
You might want to check out this web site:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
It gives a better explanation of how poor an idea
crustal displacement is and more information
about Hapgood. It also has the quote from Einstein.
--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
High Counselor of the New Usenet Order
Addicted to Art Bell? http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/1282
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, Lifetime member of the
Art Bell Internet Fan Club, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: jamiemps(at)mindspring.com
*DrPostman
Jean Guernon <jgue...@ivic.qc.ca> wrote:
>Sorry if I use this to in fact talk about another post...
>This is exact. But it doesn't explain why some people still believe that the
>HAARP project could trigger earthquake... HAARP can certainly destroy a lot
>through local climate change (if military application is considered, but to
>disrupt those pressures take a lot more as all the (serious) site will
>somewhat point out. Of course, nuclear detonation do have some disrupting
>effect to a certain extent in localized area, but, precisely because these can
>(well could since from now on they will be banned) only be undertook in
>sovereign country and could only hurt the said country and only if there are
>already areas that have some imbalanced tectonic plates I think...
>Anyway, the question is how on earth can HAARP be applied. Even according to
>what's below, it would, if there could be an output as powerful as some
>significant part of the mass of the earth, in fact disrupt the whole planet,
>not localized area... So it's not really practical even if it was somewhat
>feasible...
>Or am I missing something?
>
>J.
I don't think you are missing a thing. It is nice to see someone who
doesn't look at every government research project as some sort of
doomsday weapon ready to destroy us all.
Jean Guernon
Greg Marcus wrote:
> Okay. Let me say that this whole Earth-crust displacement thing was
> released on newswire last year.. can't remember which service carried it,
> but it was in the Ottawa citizen. No mention of Hapsgood's work in the 50s
> or whenever.. acted like it was new.
>
> This displacemnet happens because, more or less, of built up force.
> accumaltive stress. If they are working on, or have earthquake technology,
> I bet they are trying to relieve some of this stress. To lessen the
> damage.
>
> I'm more interested in what might happen in the field around the earth
> disappears for awhile, or becomes unstable. Our brain works with such
> fields.. we evolved within the field of the earth. The whole universe is a
> web of these fields.. micro, macro.. fields within fields.. I wonder what
> happens to us if it's gone.
>
>
I'm not sure if you mean what I think... when the earth looses its atmosphere?
When we become a dead planet?
Jean.
> Jean Guernon (jgue...@ivic.qc.ca) writes:
> > Sorry if I use this to in fact talk about another post...
> > This is exact. But it doesn't explain why some people still believe that the
> > HAARP project could trigger earthquake... HAARP can certainly destroy a lot
> > through local climate change (if military application is considered, but to
> > disrupt those pressures take a lot more as all the (serious) site will
> > somewhat point out. Of course, nuclear detonation do have some disrupting
> > effect to a certain extent in localized area, but, precisely because these can
> > (well could since from now on they will be banned) only be undertook in
> > sovereign country and could only hurt the said country and only if there are
> > already areas that have some imbalanced tectonic plates I think...
> > Anyway, the question is how on earth can HAARP be applied. Even according to
> > what's below, it would, if there could be an output as powerful as some
> > significant part of the mass of the earth, in fact disrupt the whole planet,
> > not localized area... So it's not really practical even if it was somewhat
> > feasible...
> > Or am I missing something?
> >
> > J.
> >
> > Greg Marcus wrote:
> >
> >> The dipolar magnetic field around the earth is a result of the high
> >> pressure reactions of the earth's molten and plasma core, the spinning of
> >> this core, and the crust of the earth. Period.
> >>
> >> if something happens, oh.. like the CRUST sliding, LOOSE, over the core,
> >> whether it is slight or tremendous, it will have an affect on said field.
> >>
> >> I suggest you read the work of Hapsgood (Charles or George.. don't rote
> >> memorize, sorry). Einstein was onside with him.
> >>
> >> You can find this discussed in great detail in the books "Fingerprints of
> >> the Gods" by Graham Hancock, and "The Day the Sky fell".
> >>
> >> And then compare it to Rev. Where it talks about the "stars falling" and
> >> no piece of land being in the same place it was before. It's mentioned
> >> again later on as "The millstone".. Read these books and it will be clear.
> >>
Greg Marcus
Jean Guernon (jgue...@ivic.qc.ca) writes:
> Greg Marcus wrote:
>
>> Okay. Let me say that this whole Earth-crust displacement thing was
>> released on newswire last year.. can't remember which service carried it,
>> but it was in the Ottawa citizen. No mention of Hapsgood's work in the 50s
>> or whenever.. acted like it was new.
>>
>> This displacemnet happens because, more or less, of built up force.
>> accumaltive stress. If they are working on, or have earthquake technology,
>> I bet they are trying to relieve some of this stress. To lessen the
>> damage.
>>
>> I'm more interested in what might happen in the field around the earth
>> disappears for awhile, or becomes unstable. Our brain works with such
>> fields.. we evolved within the field of the earth. The whole universe is a
>> web of these fields.. micro, macro.. fields within fields.. I wonder what
>> happens to us if it's gone.
>>
>>
>
> I'm not sure if you mean what I think... when the earth looses its atmosphere?
>
> When we become a dead planet?
No no. I mean the dipolar magnetic field. Our brain is more or less
electro-magnetic.. and has always existed within the field of the earth.
Does our brain become unstable when it is gone?
I am wondering becaue of Gods seal, or mark, on the forehead of revelations.
I think i know what it is. Cause during my "experienc" (jan96-mayish96) my
forehead changed shaped. My girl at the time mentioned it first, and a
couple of other friends did. When it was over, and I had lost everything,
and I had to start jumping thru hoops for those tht were worried about me
and the things I had been talking about, I started going thru the tests.
On my catscan, the ventricles of my brain showed up to be a little enlarged..
I was severely logically minded before, but still probably around 140-150
iq, WITH botching the abstract part. I could barely understand the concept
of "abstract".. Gee, what has happened to me.
Brandy Dominick
You want to build a super weapon. So you go build it, announce it to the
entire world. It just sits there, ready to be destroyed by any and all.
Doesn't make sense to me either.
brandy
*DrPostman wrote in message <350340aa...@news.mindspring.com>...
Jean Guernon
Greg Marcus wrote:
> Jean Guernon (jgue...@ivic.qc.ca) writes:
> > Greg Marcus wrote:
> >
> >> Okay. Let me say that this whole Earth-crust displacement thing was
> >> released on newswire last year.. can't remember which service carried it,
> >> but it was in the Ottawa citizen. No mention of Hapsgood's work in the 50s
> >> or whenever.. acted like it was new.
> >>
> >> This displacemnet happens because, more or less, of built up force.
> >> accumaltive stress. If they are working on, or have earthquake technology,
> >> I bet they are trying to relieve some of this stress. To lessen the
> >> damage.
> >>
> >> I'm more interested in what might happen in the field around the earth
> >> disappears for awhile, or becomes unstable. Our brain works with such
> >> fields.. we evolved within the field of the earth. The whole universe is a
> >> web of these fields.. micro, macro.. fields within fields.. I wonder what
> >> happens to us if it's gone.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I'm not sure if you mean what I think... when the earth looses its atmosphere?
> >
> > When we become a dead planet?
>
> No no. I mean the dipolar magnetic field. Our brain is more or less
> electro-magnetic.. and has always existed within the field of the earth.
> Does our brain become unstable when it is gone?
>
We get our electromagnetic impulse as you say, our neuron impulses from
calcium
ionisation, not from external sources. If you get additional external
static electric
impulses, then yes, there is dangger, but less, hmmm, I don,t think so.
but you"d
surely get funny weather patterns...
> I am wondering becaue of Gods seal, or mark, on the forehead of revelations.
> I think i know what it is. Cause during my "experienc" (jan96-mayish96) my
> forehead changed shaped. My girl at the time mentioned it first, and a
> couple of other friends did. When it was over, and I had lost everything,
> and I had to start jumping thru hoops for those tht were worried about me
> and the things I had been talking about, I started going thru the tests.
> On my catscan, the ventricles of my brain showed up to be a little enlarged..
>
> I was severely logically minded before, but still probably around 140-150
> iq, WITH botching the abstract part. I could barely understand the concept
> of "abstract".. Gee, what has happened to me.
>
Bad acid? ;-)No tumor? I know of a good friend of mine who turned crazy
for nothing last summer (doesn't use drugs)... The head of the
psychiatric dept of the local hospital where he was is a very good
friend of mine and one of my neighbor, told me, (well in general since
he can't very well discuss particular cases) that this happen, it
accumulates years after years, and one dsay the individual cracks...
Then after the psychosis, etc... it's usually lithium for quite a
while... I guess.
Jean.
> >
> > [snip]
adude
Brandy Dominick <bran...@bigfoot.com> wrote in article
<2E8150BC405FB6D1.1B7A5801...@library-proxy.airnews.ne
t>...
> You want to build a super weapon. So you go build it, announce it to the
> entire world. It just sits there, ready to be destroyed by any and all.
> Doesn't make sense to me either.
>
> brandy
You build something that must be near the north pole, stationary,
unshieldable and expansive enough to be seen by any satellite. You have no
choice but to announce it to the entire world. You say it's purpose is to
study the relationship between weather patterns and charged particles in
the ionosphere. You protect it well with numerous batteries of surface to
air missiles.
RONCRAFT
>I don't think you are missing a thing. It is nice to see someone who>doesn't
look at every government research project as some sort of>doomsday weapon ready
to destroy us all.
>
and break things. The sole reason for the existence of the military/inudstrial
compex is to think up and produce bigger and better ways to kill people and
break things, while ripping off the taxpayers to the greatest extent possible.
. HAARP is no different :-).
ron
*DrPostman
"Brandy Dominick" <bran...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>You want to build a super weapon. So you go build it, announce it to the
>entire world. It just sits there, ready to be destroyed by any and all.
>Doesn't make sense to me either.
>
>brandy
They even had an "open house" at the site a while back and invited the
press and the locals to check it out. When was the last time Area 51
had an open house?
*DrPostman
"adude" <ad...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>Brandy Dominick <bran...@bigfoot.com> wrote in article
><2E8150BC405FB6D1.1B7A5801...@library-proxy.airnews.ne
>t>...
>> You want to build a super weapon. So you go build it, announce it to the
>> entire world. It just sits there, ready to be destroyed by any and all.
>> Doesn't make sense to me either.
>>
>> brandy
>
>You build something that must be near the north pole, stationary,
>unshieldable and expansive enough to be seen by any satellite. You have no
>choice but to announce it to the entire world. You say it's purpose is to
>study the relationship between weather patterns and charged particles in
>the ionosphere. You protect it well with numerous batteries of surface to
>air missiles.
And then you have an open house at the site. Please.
Brandy Dominick
*DrPostman wrote in message <35018e25...@news.mindspring.com>...
>"Brandy Dominick" <bran...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>>You want to build a super weapon. So you go build it, announce it to the
>>entire world. It just sits there, ready to be destroyed by any and all.
>>Doesn't make sense to me either.
>>
>>brandy
>
>They even had an "open house" at the site a while back and invited the
>press and the locals to check it out. When was the last time Area 51
>had an open house?
>
>
We're probably in more danger from 'our' scientists doing something by
accident than on purpose. <g>
brandy
Aron
>
>No no. I mean the dipolar magnetic field. Our brain is more or less
>electro-magnetic.. and has always existed within the field of the earth.
>Does our brain become unstable when it is gone?
So do astronauts lose it when they are in space? Your theory has just fell
flat.
>I am wondering becaue of Gods seal, or mark, on the forehead of
revelations.
>I think i know what it is. Cause during my "experienc" (jan96-mayish96) my
>forehead changed shaped. My girl at the time mentioned it first
and then she left you.
>, and a
>couple of other friends did.
.and they left you too.
>When it was over, and I had lost everything,
ahem, you shouldnt have meddled with silly things.
>and I had to start jumping thru hoops for those tht were worried about me
>and the things I had been talking about, I started going thru the tests.
>On my catscan, the ventricles of my brain showed up to be a little
enlarged..
>
>I was severely logically minded before,
and now the logic has gone.
Aron
>The idea of crustal displacement was replaced with knowledge of plate
>tectonics which came as a result of mapping the ocean floor in the mid
>1960's
>
And that should have ended theories that Antartica is Atlantis, bu there are
too many ignorant theorists who still cling to old beliefs.
Aron
RONCRAFT wrote in message <19980306044...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
Ron, have you ever thought that they are developing a system of planetary
defense? We are moving into space soon, colonising it. We'll meet other life
who can be aggressive to us. Its not just about countries anymore but about
the universe.
Anton
RONCRAFT wrote:
> Hey, the sole reason for government weapons system projects is to kill people
> and break things. The sole reason for the existence of the military/inudstrial
> compex is to think up and produce bigger and better ways to kill people and
> break things, while ripping off the taxpayers to the greatest extent possible.
> . HAARP is no different :-).
>
> ron
No! There is a difference - HAARP is far more efficient & effective
than atomic weapons!
==
Peter Lemesurier
"Aron" <a.mal...@virgin.net> wrote:
>>
>>No no. I mean the dipolar magnetic field. Our brain is more or less
>>electro-magnetic.. and has always existed within the field of the earth.
>>Does our brain become unstable when it is gone?
>So do astronauts lose it when they are in space? Your theory has just fell
>flat.
>>I am wondering becaue of Gods seal, or mark, on the forehead of
>revelations.
>>I think i know what it is. Cause during my "experienc" (jan96-mayish96) my
>>forehead changed shaped. My girl at the time mentioned it first
>and then she left you.
>>, and a
>>couple of other friends did.
>.and they left you too.
>>When it was over, and I had lost everything,
>ahem, you shouldnt have meddled with silly things.
>>and I had to start jumping thru hoops for those tht were worried about me
>>and the things I had been talking about, I started going thru the tests.
>>On my catscan, the ventricles of my brain showed up to be a little
>enlarged..
>>
>>I was severely logically minded before,
>and now the logic has gone.
No need to be so unkind, Aron!
--
Peter
Peter Lemesurier
"Aron" <a.mal...@virgin.net> wrote:
>RONCRAFT wrote in message <19980306044...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
>>>I don't think you are missing a thing. It is nice to see someone
>who>doesn't
>>look at every government research project as some sort of>doomsday weapon
>ready
>>to destroy us all.
>>>
>>Hey, the sole reason for government weapons system projects is to kill
>people
>>and break things. The sole reason for the existence of the
>military/inudstrial
>>compex is to think up and produce bigger and better ways to kill people and
>>break things, while ripping off the taxpayers to the greatest extent
>possible.
>>. HAARP is no different :-).
>>
>>ron
>>
>Ron, have you ever thought that they are developing a system of planetary
>defense? We are moving into space soon, colonising it. We'll meet other life
>who can be aggressive to us. Its not just about countries anymore but about
>the universe.
Oh, sure. The fact that we're paranoid doesn't mean that They're not
out to get us...
--
Peter
Burak
An anecdote of cold war time, regarding Turkey. As you know know,
Turkey has always spent a lot on defense.
It was rumored that, once a Soviet official told a Turkish official, "If
your army is for us, it is too small, if it is for your neighbours, it
is too big."
Same for our enemies from space. For them too small, for any other
country, too much.
Comments, Aron ?
Burak
Greg Marcus
"Aron" (a.mal...@virgin.net) writes:
>>
>>No no. I mean the dipolar magnetic field. Our brain is more or less
>>electro-magnetic.. and has always existed within the field of the earth.
>>Does our brain become unstable when it is gone?
>
> So do astronauts lose it when they are in space? Your theory has just fell
> flat.
Umm.. how far have they gone? The moon. I'm talking about the field
DISAPPEARING, and the effect it might even have on the field of the entire
solar system. Perhaps the shift is solar system wide?
>
>>I am wondering becaue of Gods seal, or mark, on the forehead of
> revelations.
>>I think i know what it is. Cause during my "experienc" (jan96-mayish96) my
>>forehead changed shaped. My girl at the time mentioned it first
>
> and then she left you.
Oh, about a year after she did, when I was not any longer motivated by
things that did before.
And the change in my head didn't leave.. but.. what does that matter.
>
>>, and a
>>couple of other friends did.
>
> .and they left you too.
Nope. They tend to listen to me. They take it with a grain of salt, but
they listen.
>
>>When it was over, and I had lost everything,
>
> ahem, you shouldnt have meddled with silly things.
>
Like I am doing now with you?
>
>>and I had to start jumping thru hoops for those tht were worried about me
>>and the things I had been talking about, I started going thru the tests.
>>On my catscan, the ventricles of my brain showed up to be a little
> enlarged..
>>
>>I was severely logically minded before,
>
> and now the logic has gone.
No, it is balanced by the abstract.
>
>
>
>
Aron Aron Aron.. if peter hadn't responded, I wouldn't even known this was
here.. I have been completely skipping your half brained posts.
Are you sure you want me to pay attention to you again?
adude
*DrPostman <Lo...@mysig.emailthere> wrote in article
<35028e89...@news.mindspring.com>...
> "adude" <ad...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >Brandy Dominick <bran...@bigfoot.com> wrote in article
>
><2E8150BC405FB6D1.1B7A5801...@library-proxy.airnews.n
e
> >t>...
the
> >> entire world. It just sits there, ready to be destroyed by any and
all.
> >> Doesn't make sense to me either.
> >>
> >> brandy
> >
> >unshieldable and expansive enough to be seen by any satellite. You have
no
> >choice but to announce it to the entire world. You say it's purpose is
to
> >study the relationship between weather patterns and charged particles in
> >the ionosphere. You protect it well with numerous batteries of surface
to
> >air missiles.
>
What can you see there that a satellite cannot? The secret is not what you
see. It is how the grid is used. The effects are not visible.
*DrPostman
"adude" <ad...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>*DrPostman <Lo...@mysig.emailthere> wrote in article
>> And then you have an open house at the site. Please.
>
>What can you see there that a satellite cannot? The secret is not what you
>see. It is how the grid is used. The effects are not visible.
But the equipment to run it is - the potential can be gleaned by
looking at what operates it.
adude
*DrPostman <Lo...@mysig.emailthere> wrote in article
> "adude" <ad...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >*DrPostman <Lo...@mysig.emailthere> wrote in article
> >> And then you have an open house at the site. Please.
> >
> >What can you see there that a satellite cannot? The secret is not what
you
> >see. It is how the grid is used. The effects are not visible.
>
> But the equipment to run it is - the potential can be gleaned by
> looking at what operates it.
Do you think that during their *open house*, they show *everything* that is
used? They show enough to convice the sheeple that it is only what they
say it is. And I'm sure that all of them who have taken the tour leave
there totally convinced of that.
To think that the government would show everything about HAARP or any other
device on a military facility is ludicrous. Anyway, how many people have
the knowledge to determine simply by looking at the instrumentation what
the device is capable of? Even a group of PhD physicists and electrical
engineers would be dumbfounded without spending many hours going through
the details of it.