HAARP Update
garrison
Subject: Military Ionospheric
From: search...@channel1.com (Searchnet Zec)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 1994 06:40:00 -0400
From: char...@qm.wv.tek.com (Steve Frost)
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
Subject: Military Ionospheric Study
Date: 27 Dec 1994 18:21:18 GMT
The following was written by Linda Moulton Howe and is reproduced with
the permission of ISCNI.
1) MILITARY PLANS TO MANIPULATE IONOSPHERE AND "X-RAY" NORTHERN
HEMISPHERE
Gakona, Alaska -
A new military project wants to use electromagnetic frequencies to
manipulate the ionosphere and to search underground for tunnels,
shelters and structures in the Northern Hemisphere. Presumably, DoD
knows where the government's own underground structures are. Are they
looking for terrorists? Or perhaps something more alien?
Testing begins this month on what could become the world's most
powerful "ionospheric heater" - an intense and focused beam of
electromagnetic energy "to control ionospheric processes," according
to the Defense Department. The earth's ionosphere is an electrically
conducting layer of gasses ionized by solar radiation. It's altitude
ranges from 30 to 500 miles.
The U.S. Air Force's Phillips Laboratory and the U.S. Navy's Office of
Naval Research are in charge of Project HAARP - High Frequency Active
Auroral Research Project. HAARP surfaced publicly in Alaska in the
spring of 1993 when the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
contacted commercial pilots about how to avoid HAARP's intense
electromagnetic radiation that will cause radio interference and
perhaps even effect the navigation of migratory birds.
HAARP's first focusing tests will be in the 320 kilowatt range, but
the goal is to reach 1.7 gigawatts (1.7 billion watts) pulsing a high
frequency beam in the 2.8-10 Megahertz band.
According to researcher Clare Zickuhr in the Spring 1994 issue of
Earth Island Journal, military applications will include: "Generation
of ionospheric lenses to focus large amounts of HF energy at high
altitudes ... providing a means for triggering ionospheric processes
that potentially could be exploited for DOD purposes ... Generation of
ionization layers below 45 miles to provide radio wave reflectors
("mirrors") which can be exploited for long range, over-the- horizon
HF/VHF/UHF surveillance purposes, including the detection of cruise
missiles and other low observables."
HAARP's military applications are further detailed in a "National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995" (Senate Report
103-282) which states: HAARP "could allow earth-penetrating tomography
over most of the northern hemisphere. Such a capability would permit
the detection and precise location of tunnels, shelters, and other
underground shelters... and structures."
WHOSE underground structures?
=============================================
* RM 1.3 02503 * rik.p...@channel1.com
garrison
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 1995 17:46:29 CST
From: Mark Meyer <mme...@RTS.DSEG.TI.COM>
Subject: Re: HAARP Update
>>>>> "sf" == Steve Frost or somebody writes:
sf> Subject: MESSAGE FORWARDED FROM CULTLEADER
Oh, goody.
sf> A new military project wants to use electromagnetic frequencies
sf> to manipulate the ionosphere and to search underground for
sf> tunnels, shelters and structures in the Northern
sf> Hemisphere. Presumably, DoD knows where the government's own
sf> underground structures are. Are they looking for terrorists? Or
sf> perhaps something more alien?
Excuse me, but there's more to the Northern Hemisphere than
just the US and Canada. Ever hear of "Russia"? It's pretty big,
don't know how Linda could've missed it.
sf> HAARP's military applications are further detailed in a "National
sf> Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995" (Senate Report
sf> 103-282) which states: HAARP "could allow earth-penetrating
sf> tomography over most of the northern hemisphere. Such a
sf> capability would permit the detection and precise location of
sf> tunnels, shelters, and other underground shelters... and
sf> structures."
sf> WHOSE underground structures?
The enemy's, I would assume. It'd be more interesting to test
it over Russia, of course, but Boris Yeltsin wouldn't give the DOD
permission. Duh.
--
Mark Meyer | mme...@dseg.ti.com |
Texas Instruments, Inc., Plano, TX +--------------------+
Every day, Jerry Junkins is grateful that I don't speak for TI.
Make you so blitzed you hallucinate strange TV shows: Can your beer do this?