Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

LONGEST KNOWN PALINDROLE

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeff X. Mink

unread,
Oct 28, 1994, 12:29:48 PM10/28/94
to
>> The Illuminati do not exist. Period. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>Okay, we can turn this into a discussion of The Illuminati. To start things
>off: How can you "exchange information of a useful nature regarding the topic
>of The Illuminati" when "The Illuminati do not exist"? The most useful
peice of
>information that you could use is that "The Illuminati do not exist".

Well, here's a useful piece of information for you:
Anyone who says "The Illuminati do not exist" either has been
brainwashed by the Iluminati, or is in fact one of the Illuminati
themselves.

Mentally Yours,

Jeff Mink
Emperor of the Universe
Scourge of the Galaxy
High Priest of the Church of Harmonic Chaos


Dennis McClain-Furmanski

unread,
Oct 28, 1994, 10:29:02 PM10/28/94
to
Jeff X. Mink (jm...@andrew.cmu.edu) wrote:
: >> The Illuminati do not exist. Period. Thank you for your cooperation.

: >
: >Okay, we can turn this into a discussion of The Illuminati. To start things
: >off: How can you "exchange information of a useful nature regarding the topic
: >of The Illuminati" when "The Illuminati do not exist"? The most useful
: peice of
: >information that you could use is that "The Illuminati do not exist".

: Well, here's a useful piece of information for you:
: Anyone who says "The Illuminati do not exist" either has been
: brainwashed by the Iluminati, or is in fact one of the Illuminati
: themselves.

They exist, but there's damn fewer of them than there used to be.
I've been keeping them for breeding, but they do it so poorly that I've
taken to killing them and eating their cerebral cotices.

What am I supposed to eat, Purina Yeti Chow?

--
dyn...@infi.net The Doctor is on.

Steersy

unread,
Oct 27, 1994, 2:18:12 PM10/27/94
to
In article <38oo0l$k...@hobbes.cc.uga.edu>, bwi...@dcs.uga.edu (Brian D. Wilson) writes:
> In article <1994Oct27.1...@ttinews.tti.com>,
> Erik Sorgatz <sor...@avatar.tti.com> wrote:
>> Would you people kindly take this out of 'alt.illuminati'? Some of us are
>>trying to exchange information of a useful nature regarding the topic of
>>The Illuminati, whomever "They" might be and this palindrome is hardly a
>>part of the matter in any way, shape or form. Might I suggest that in a
>>most-proper sense, this run-on thread really belongs in 'alt.cascade'?

>
> The Illuminati do not exist. Period. Thank you for your cooperation.

Okay, we can turn this into a discussion of The Illuminati. To start things
off: How can you "exchange information of a useful nature regarding the topic
of The Illuminati" when "The Illuminati do not exist"? The most useful peice of
information that you could use is that "The Illuminati do not exist".

--
This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire civil-
ized world. Your message will cost _\|/_ the net hundreds if not thousands
of dollars to send everywhere. Please {@ @} be sure you know what you are doing
===================================ooO=(_)=Ooo=================================
Keep a cool and have a good Weekend!

Jeff X. Mink

unread,
Oct 30, 1994, 2:58:29 AM10/30/94
to
Excerpts from netnews.alt.discordia: 29-Oct-94 Re: LONGEST KNOWN
PALINDROLE by Po Tra...@cornell.edu
> In article <gigGPw600...@andrew.cmu.edu> "Jeff X. Mink"
<jm...@andrew.cm

> u.edu> writes:
>
> >>> The Illuminati do not exist. Period. Thank you for your cooperation.
> >>
> >>Okay, we can turn this into a discussion of The Illuminati. To
start thing
> s
> >>off: How can you "exchange information of a useful nature regarding the
> >topic
> >>of The Illuminati" when "The Illuminati do not exist"? The most useful
> >peice of
> >>information that you could use is that "The Illuminati do not exist".
>
> >Well, here's a useful piece of information for you:
> >Anyone who says "The Illuminati do not exist" either has been
> >brainwashed by the Iluminati, or is in fact one of the Illuminati
> >themselves.
>
> Where do those who CLAIM to be members fit in to the picture? eh?

Well, they are either lying, or they are members of the Illuminati that
want you to BELIEVE that they are lying, so that you won't suspect them
of really being Illuminati.

(Someone once wrote in a yearbook of mine that I was the most blatantly
Illuminati type-person that they had ever met. I can't figure out what
they were talking about.)

Po Tragna

unread,
Oct 28, 1994, 11:24:30 PM10/28/94
to
In article <gigGPw600...@andrew.cmu.edu> "Jeff X. Mink" <jm...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>>> The Illuminati do not exist. Period. Thank you for your cooperation.
>>
>>Okay, we can turn this into a discussion of The Illuminati. To start things
>>off: How can you "exchange information of a useful nature regarding the
>topic
>>of The Illuminati" when "The Illuminati do not exist"? The most useful
>peice of
>>information that you could use is that "The Illuminati do not exist".

>Well, here's a useful piece of information for you:
>Anyone who says "The Illuminati do not exist" either has been
>brainwashed by the Iluminati, or is in fact one of the Illuminati
>themselves.

Where do those who CLAIM to be members fit in to the picture? eh?

-Po Tragna
Bite the Wax Tadpole


LI W

unread,
Nov 2, 1994, 7:45:08 AM11/2/94
to
Steersy (stee...@cc.memphis.edu) wrote:


Actually this _IS_ all part of the longest known planindrome.

And that palindrom is another way of expressing that crazy mobius loop we call-

life

-william li
consultant-in-exile

LI W

unread,
Nov 7, 1994, 5:57:12 AM11/7/94
to

On Thu, 3 Nov 1994, John Scott Flanagan wrote:

> In article <1994Nov2.1...@city.ac.uk> you write:
> >Steersy (stee...@cc.memphis.edu) wrote:

> >Actually this _IS_ all part of the longest known planindrome.
> >
> >And that palindrom is another way of expressing that crazy mobius loop we call-
> >
> >life
> >
> >-william li
> > consultant-in-exile
> >
>

> Thank you so much for changing exactly one letter of the subject line of
> this idiotic thread. Now those of us who are actually interested
> in reading about the subject to which our newsgroups are devoted get
> to add yet another line to our killfiles. Now thousands of people around
> the world will experience the joy of waiting the extra time our
> newsreaders take to filter every post with an additional line of garbage.
> --
> Stamp out entropy.
> ->Scott Flanagan (dry...@owlnet.rice.edu)
>
Your welcome. Its nice to see that while I'm in exile, snottiness still
lives at Rice University.

BTW, you silly man, one man's spam is another man's diversion, and since
as overprivelleged American university students, we get usenet service as
part of our tuition, you shouldn't winge about bandwidth. Especially not
as one who reads alt.illuminatti, or the equally relevant groups i am
posting to. I'm sure the microseconds wasted waiting around are stolen
directly from the time you dedicate to HUMA 101

-william li
consultant-in-exile


BTW, give big Marty a pat on the but for me.

Steersy

unread,
Nov 7, 1994, 11:24:01 AM11/7/94
to
LI "Pat Marty's Butt" W <dg...@city.ac.uk> writes:

> On Thu, 3 Nov 1994, John "Change One Letter" Flanagan wrote:
>> In article <1994Nov2.1...@city.ac.uk> you write:
>> >Steersy (stee...@cc.memphis.edu) wrote:
>> >: In article <38oo0l$k...@hobbes.cc.uga.edu>, bwi...@dcs.uga.edu (Brian D. Wilson) writes:
>> >: > In article <1994Oct27.1...@ttinews.tti.com>,
>> >: > Erik Sorgatz <sor...@avatar.tti.com> wrote:
>> >: >> Would you people kindly take this out of 'alt.illuminati'? Some of us are
>> >: >>trying to exchange information of a useful nature regarding the topic of
>> >: >>part of the matter in any way, shape or form. Might I suggest that in a
>> >: >>most-proper sense, this run-on thread really belongs in 'alt.cascade'?
>> >: >
>> >: > The Illuminati do not exist. Period. Thank you for your cooperation.
>> >: Okay, we can turn this into a discussion of The Illuminati. To start things
>> >: off: How can you "exchange information of a useful nature regarding the topic
>> >: of The Illuminati" when "The Illuminati do not exist"? The most useful peice of
>> >: information that you could use is that "The Illuminati do not exist".
>> >
>> >Actually this _IS_ all part of the longest known planindrome.

Will you please answer the quesion! What good is it talking about the
Illuminati if they do not exist?


>> >
>> >And that palindrom is another way of expressing that crazy mobius loop we call-
>> >life
>>

>> Thank you so much for changing exactly one letter of the subject line of

You are very welcome!


>> this idiotic thread. Now those of us who are actually interested
>> in reading about the subject to which our newsgroups are devoted get
>> to add yet another line to our killfiles. Now thousands of people around

The proper name is censorship file. Please note that and use the PC term for
it.


>> the world will experience the joy of waiting the extra time our
>> newsreaders take to filter every post with an additional line of garbage.

Oh, dear, what a bummer.
>> Stamp out entropy.

Do you mean the Illuminati, or censorship files?


>>
> Your welcome. Its nice to see that while I'm in exile, snottiness still
> lives at Rice University.
>
> BTW, you silly man, one man's spam is another man's diversion, and since
> as overprivelleged American university students, we get usenet service as

> as one who reads alt.illuminatti, or the equally relevant groups i am
> posting to. I'm sure the microseconds wasted waiting around are stolen
> directly from the time you dedicate to HUMA 101

Joseph Bay

unread,
Nov 10, 1994, 9:03:27 AM11/10/94
to
Stamp out entropy? STAMP OUT ENTROPY?

That's like posting "Ex-Soviet Armenia is k00l!" to soc.culture.turkey!


--
"There is much more to this demented post, than this paragraph."
-- Andrew Beckwith "Grate spirits have always encountered violint
opposition from mediocer minds" -- A. Einstein
"Without trolling, the Internet wouldn't be where it is today" --John Yeung

0 new messages