GARY CONDIT UNFIT TO SERVE ON HOMELAND SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE
CB
9/24/2001 Press Office
202-646-5172
GARY CONDIT UNFIT TO SERVE ON HOMELAND SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE
TWO ADDITIONAL CALIFORNIA GRAND JURIES REQUESTED TO INVESTIGATE CONDIT'S
ACTIONS
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that
investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, slammed today
the appointment of Gary Condit to the House Subcommittee on Terrorism and
Homeland Security. Judicial Watch also announced that it filed on Septemper
17, 2001 two additional requests for grand jury investigations in San
Francisco and San Mateo counties. The requests were concerning Condit's
obstruction of justice and subornation of perjury with respect to Anne Marie
Smith. Ms. Smith, who is also represented by Jim Robinson, was asked
repeatedly to sign a false affidavit by Condit and his agents. California
law allows citizens to bypass prosecutors and go directly to grand juries
with complaints of criminal activity.
"In this time of national emergency, we can think of few worse to lead
Congress's fight against terrorism than Gary Condit, who has been implicated
in the disappearance of a young intern. His lies and obstruction of justice
make him unfit to hold public office, let alone a sensitive post on the
Terrorism and Homeland Security Subcommittee. His presence on that committee
is a threat to our nation's security because of, among other things, the
potential for blackmail. Perhaps a grand jury investigation will force
Condit from this sensitive post," stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General
Counsel Larry Klayman.
"House Speaker Dennis Hastert and House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt should
take immediate action to not only remove Condit from the Terrorism and
Homeland Security Subcommittee, but remove him the equally sensitive House
Intelligence Committee. Do the Speaker and the Minority Leader think that
Gary Condit is qualified for this job?" asked Judicial Watch President Tom
Fitton.
Sid9
life.
If Condit is disqualified isn't Gingrich disqualified... or does that only
go for Democrats?
"CB" <c...@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:9oo1ck$3uh$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
CB
integrity and position in government rather than satisfying his alter ego.
There lies the vulnerability. If Americans can't trust our elected people to
honor personal vows taken before spouse and God, how can we expect them to
honor their pledge to country and its security?
I doubt if this means anything to you.
CB
"He who is void of virtuous attachments in private life is, or very soon
will be, void of all regard for his country."
--Samuel Adams
"Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:QcMr7.24597$Dz6.5...@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com...
harrison numbugger
tðm᧠<>
standards only apply to Democrats.
CB wrote:
>
> This "is" about national security. Condit should have protected his
> integrity and position in government rather than satisfying his alter ego.
> There lies the vulnerability. If Americans can't trust our elected people to
> honor personal vows taken before spouse and God, how can we expect them to
> honor their pledge to country and its security?
>
> I doubt if this means anything to you.
>
> CB
> "He who is void of virtuous attachments in private life is, or very soon
> will be, void of all regard for his country."
>
> --Samuel Adams
>
> "Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
Oldspook
"CB" <c...@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:9oo1ck$3uh$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
Itold...@rightwing.com
a right wing nut;
>(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that
>investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse,
Judicial Twatch does nothing of the kind
It receives money from the Same idiot conspiracist who shoots pumpkins
to legally harass people they don't like
Klayman and Co. have NEVER won a lawsuit against anyone (except his
mother)
Itold...@rightwing.com
a right wing nut;
>This "is" about national security. Condit should have protected his
>integrity and position in government rather than satisfying his alter ego.
You mean not acting like reagan, gingrich, livingston, chenoweth,
Hyde, Watts, Barr?
>There lies the vulnerability. If Americans can't trust our elected people to
>honor personal vows taken before spouse and God, how can we expect them to
>honor their pledge to country and its security?
Do you now condemn those listed above and consider THEM unfit?
>
>I doubt if this means anything to you.
Ditto
>Sherwood, your a nigger!
dd...@k.net
>On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:17:53 -0400, "CB" <c...@prayforme.com> wrote like
>a right wing nut;
>
>>This "is" about national security. Condit should have protected his
>>integrity and position in government rather than satisfying his alter ego.
>
>You mean not acting like reagan, gingrich, livingston, chenoweth,
>Hyde, Watts, Barr?
>
>>There lies the vulnerability. If Americans can't trust our elected people to
>>honor personal vows taken before spouse and God, how can we expect them to
>>honor their pledge to country and its security?
>
>Do you now condemn those listed above and consider THEM unfit?
>
>>
The above named conservatives have been sent by God. He has rewarded
them with exemption from the commandments of more sinful men as you
and your liberal scum.
CB
of the country in peril. Again that's something your flower child mentality
cannot comprehend.
CB
--
"Beware the tyranny of the minority." --Latin Proverb
"tšmį§" <(©æ©)e...@spam.yum> wrote in message
news:3BAF8E04...@spam.yum...
cbal...@yep.com
a right wing nut;
>of the country in peril. Again that's something your flower child mentality
>cannot comprehend.
What specific "ethical standards" that Condit is missing, does Barr,
Chenoweth, Hyde, Gingrich, Watts, Livingston, Hutchinson, have,
CBLOON?
Ayn R Keey
news:9oo47b$5h2$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com:
> This "is" about national security. Condit should have protected his
> integrity and position in government rather than satisfying his alter
> ego. There lies the vulnerability. If Americans can't trust our elected
> people to honor personal vows taken before spouse and God, how can we
> expect them to honor their pledge to country and its security?
"I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of
atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being
worshipped by many who think themselves Christians."
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789
anybody who holds public elected office cannot be trusted, c'mon where are
your rants about the immorality of hyde, gingrinch, barr, hutchenson??????
pure partisan crap, from a man so used to evil, that you did not even
layoff of the vileness on the day after 9-11-01!
>
> I doubt if this means anything to you.
>
> ClownBoyoftheRight
> "He who is void of virtuous attachments in private life is, or very
> soon will be, void of all regard for his country.">
> --Samuel Adams
those honorable people at NSA and intel at the pentagon have done a
wonderful job for the country CB. they need radical leftists within them,
then they would have members with brains.
----------------------------------
new oxymoron====NATIONAL SECURITY
----------------------------------
> >> > Counsel Larry Klayman.
Frivolous Litigators of the Right Chairman & Founder
Larry serves as their Chairman and General Counsel, and now seeks to end
our freedoms and liberty even more by telling the shrub who to appoint to
the federal bench. if any democrat senators( ya listenin leahy?) try and
pull an anus hatch, by holding up the nominations, they will be called
traitors to the "war"? effort.
according to a may '98 newsweek, klayman asked george stephanopoulos if he
had ever witnessed clinton and his wife "scream at each other".
materiality? naw, mogrel cur of the right, who is looking to take down
liberty.
Klayman has a judge at his bidding, District Court Judge Royce Lamberth,
and has gone after journalists on many occasions, trying to get them to rat
on their confidential souurces. nixonian/ellsberg type of argument, and
should be unconstitutional.
>> >
>> > "House Speaker Dennis Hastert
The Castratti
you never answered last week when you were asked,
if due to your "pledge to country and its security"
you were offering up your firstborn to the war effort.
aries is howling in hunger for him
Ayn R Keey
news:9ookof$h46$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com:
> Read the subject line. It's Condits ethical standards that put the
> security of the country in peril. Again that's something your flower
> child mentality cannot comprehend.
>
> CB
> --
> "Beware the tyranny of the minority." --Latin Proverb
with each new day of our admin, we have that proverb driven home.
blue...@webtv.net
CB
<blue...@webtv.net> wrote in message news:21086-3B...@storefull-612.iap.bryant.webtv.net...Office of Homeland Security? Sound's very close to Office of Propaganda!
And Asshkkroft is licking his chop's right now I bet. But then again,
there's that darned 2004 thing again! Wait! Maybe a war that will last
to 2004 will save Bush's ass. But, then again, it didnt help Big Daddy
though. Watch out America, dont get caught up in too much "patriotic"
fervor! Asshkkroft is after our rights, and at the perfect time!
blue...@webtv.net
Sherwood
>
> WWWWWWaaaaaaaaaaaa
We have come to expect that from a pecker headed KKK redneck like you
CB.
So in addition to being a coward, a liar, a self-proclaimed bigot, a
KKK redneck, a moron, a loon and a worm, we can now add that you are a
cry baby as well.
Had your ass kicked enough yet CB or whatever your name is, or
whatever else you call yourself, or whatever dark closet you like
hiding in?
You're a panty waste deluxe....., and that's a fact Jack!
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
>
>
> --
colleen
: This "is" about national security. Condit should have protected his
: integrity and position in government rather than satisfying his alter ego.
: There lies the vulnerability. If Americans can't trust our elected people to
: honor personal vows taken before spouse and God, how can we expect them to
: honor their pledge to country and its security?
It was pointed out to you that Gingrich is advising the Bush
administration. Mr. Gingrich's inability to "honor personal vows taken
before spouse and God" is legendary and well documented. Is this not a
National Security issue too? And what about Bob Barr, Henry Hyde and the
multitude of other conservatives who have been unable or unwilling to
honor their personal vows? Is their participation in the political process
not a threat to National Security? If so, why not?
: I doubt if this means anything to you.
What it means is that you haven't thought this through. Were we to apply
your standard to congress as a whole according to Pat Robertson we would
lose 2/3rds of our leadership.
: CB
: --Samuel Adams
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: >
: >
: >
CB
It's Condit where taking about. Please keep to the subject.
Forget Gingrich, he did the honorable thing and resigned. Prove to me he is
at the right side of the presidents ear.
CB
"He who is void of virtuous attachments in private life is, or very soon
will be, void of all regard for his country."
--Samuel Adams
"colleen" <col...@animal.blarg.net> wrote in message
news:TNEs7.73$HO2....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
Rich Travsky
>
> READ THE TOPIC!!!
>
> It's Condit where taking about. Please keep to the subject.
Hey Conservative Bigot, he IS keeping to the subject. The standards you're using
reflect poorly on republicons.
> Forget Gingrich, he did the honorable thing and resigned. Prove to me he is
> at the right side of the presidents ear.
Noot resigned NOT because he was found out to be cheating on his wife (again), but
because he almost lost the House.
How about Giuliani? Think he'll resign because of HIS mistress?
CB
coming back in clintonian measure.
People don't understand right from wrong anymore. We're more into gotcha
politics and refusing to hold accountable the people we trust with vital
secrets. When ever someone attempts to hold responsible or bring to justice
inappropriate wrong doers the defenders of the indefensible always have the
same fucking excuse, "everyone does it so how can you hold anyone to any
standard." No wonder Karma or Gods grace has taken a turn for the worse.
CB
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@MOVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3BB33340...@MOVEhotmail.com...
szar...@webtv.net
CB
<szar...@webtv.net> wrote in message news:15432-3BB...@storefull-615.iap.bryant.webtv.net...A tounge full of deadly poison. Judge them left, judge them right. Swing
that sword, chop off their head's, into hell with them. Your beleif,
your doctrine only! You poor ignorant blind CB. For centuries, war's,
murder's, witch hunt's. All in the name of "religon". Even to this day,
the murder of innocent people continue's. Even to the destruction of the
WTC Tower's, in the name of a "religon". While it may not be your type
of religon, it's their evil beleif's. Im sure your type is much
different. Or is it? These coward's murdered in the name of their
religon. Committed Suicide for their belief's. Would you? People have
many time's in the past with your same beleif's. Even recently, not
counting religon's violent past! So when you swing that"sword",
remember, it's double edged, and will cut you too! As written, just when
you think you know it all, you know nothing! As for me, im no preacher,
never could be. For that matter, I am not fit to be. But I can spot a
false prophet easy. And knowing every word of the Bible wont save you.
But love and forgivness will. Thought's you would call "liberal". I pity
you.I'm no preacher, believe me. You may think I'm preaching to you but I'm not. I simply point out what I believe what's coming up in the future and you don't either believe it or you hate me for telling you how it is coming true.Falwell and Roberson said without diplomacy of the wages of sin and what repercussions Grace from God being turned away from America.If Karma was the words they said would it make it any less true? I know liberals hate anything to do with judgment but just through Karma you'd have to agree abortion, drugs, columbine, sex for sport and not love all contributes to bad Karma.CBKarma can be a bitch. Goodness brings good things, evil brings wrath, judgment and US a ass kinking.
Tarver Engineering
"CB" <c...@prayforme.com> wrote in message news:9ovo9l$j2u$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
<szar...@webtv.net> wrote in message news:15432-3BB...@storefull-615.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
<snip>
A tounge full of deadly poison. Judge them left, judge them right. Swing
that sword, chop off their head's, into hell with them. Your beleif,
your doctrine only! You poor ignorant blind CB. For centuries, war's,
murder's, witch hunt's. All in the name of "religon". Even to this day,
the murder of innocent people continue's. Even to the destruction of the
WTC Tower's, in the name of a "religon". While it may not be your type
of religon, it's their evil beleif's. Im sure your type is much
different. Or is it? These coward's murdered in the name of their
religon. Committed Suicide for their belief's. Would you?
I believe the terrorists murdered in the name of cash.
If Karma was the words they said would it make it any less true? I know liberals hate anything to do with judgment but just through Karma you'd have to agree abortion, drugs, columbine, sex for sport and not love all contributes to bad Karma.
How might we avoid the influence of Yang in our gynocentric society?John
Madison
> : This "is" about national security. Condit should have protected his
> : integrity and position in government rather than satisfying his alter
ego.
> : There lies the vulnerability. If Americans can't trust our elected
people to
> : honor personal vows taken before spouse and God, how can we expect them
to
> : honor their pledge to country and its security?
>
> It was pointed out to you that Gingrich is advising the Bush
> administration. Mr. Gingrich's inability to "honor personal vows taken
> before spouse and God" is legendary and well documented. Is this not a
> National Security issue too? And what about Bob Barr, Henry Hyde and the
> multitude of other conservatives who have been unable or unwilling to
> honor their personal vows? Is their participation in the political process
> not a threat to National Security? If so, why not?
Well, for one thing, there are no dead or missing bodies associated with any
of the Republicans, unlike Condit, the Clintons, the Kennedys ...
blue...@webtv.net
Rich Travsky
>
> It's no wonder America has lost its Grace from above. All the bad Karma is
> coming back in clintonian measure.
It's because of bigots like you.
> People don't understand right from wrong anymore. We're more into gotcha
> politics and refusing to hold accountable the people we trust with vital
> secrets. When ever someone attempts to hold responsible or bring to justice
> inappropriate wrong doers the defenders of the indefensible always have the
> same fucking excuse, "everyone does it so how can you hold anyone to any
> standard." No wonder Karma or Gods grace has taken a turn for the worse.
What would a bigot like you know about right and wrong?
ddb
was untrust worthy the fact that he lied and bent the truth show that he has
something to hide. Having him on the Homeland Security group/organization
will present a very real security risk.
Anyone or nation that can gain information on his activities in regard to
the the Levy case will have very real levereage on him. This time it is not
about a missing girls it's about our national Security. I feel for him but
he has put himself into this situation and I for one don't believe that this
is an acceptable security risk.
"colleen" <col...@animal.blarg.net> wrote in message
news:TNEs7.73$HO2....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
GROWUPAMERICA
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:29:49 GMT, "ddb" <fre...@home.com> wrote:
::I think that there are other issues here. Condit showed the nation that he
::> : > >
::> : > >
::> : > >
::> : >
::> : >
::> : >
::>
::>
::