LINUX IS 15 YEARS BEHIND WHERE DOS WAS 15 YEARS AGO!!!
Alan Grimes
XT IS FASTER, MORE EFFICIENT, MORE USEFUL, EASIER, (MORE ENTERTAINING
(IF APPLICABLE)), BLISSFULLY EASY TO INSTALL, AND LEAVES PLEANTY OF FREE
SPACE ON THE 20 MB HARD DISK (If the user bothered to install it (or
even buy a HD) instead of simply running it off of floppy) AND JUST
PLAIN ALL AROUND BETTER THAN ANY SOFTWARE EVER DEVELOPED OR COMPILED FOR
LINUX RUNNING ON MODERN HARDWARE.
LINUX DEVELS ARE INCONCEIVABLY BAD.
DOS does not run properly on modern hardware. =~(
--
Uncle Sam has the Gremlin's touch.
http://users.erols.com/alangrimes/ <my website.
tim
varify your findings...,
tim
Happy Linux Dude
"Alan Grimes" <alang...@starpower.net> wrote in message
news:3BBE211F...@starpower.net...
Shawn Grant
Say No To Linux!!!!!!!!!
Tim Nesham
"Shawn Grant" <s.gra...@home.com> wrote in message
news:Yihw7.40283$Pr1.12...@news1.rdc1.tn.home.com...
Terry Porter
>I agree with you 100%
>Say No To Linux!!!!!!!!!
Easily done as Linux is not a monopoly, and as a long term Linux user,
I couldn't care what OS you run. Use what works for you.
>"Alan Grimes" <alang...@starpower.net> wrote in message
>news:3BBE211F...@starpower.net...
>> ABSOLUTLY EVERY 15 YEAR OLD DOS SOFTWARE PACKAGE THAT EVER RAN ON A 640K
>> XT IS FASTER,
At what ?
>> MORE EFFICIENT,
In what way ?
>> MORE USEFUL,
At what ?
>> EASIER,
At what ?
>> (MORE ENTERTAINING
How ?
>> (IF APPLICABLE)), BLISSFULLY EASY TO INSTALL,
Install DOS on a DEC Alpha for me will you ?
How about a Sun Spark station ?
Mac ?
No ... oh well, I guess you really meant that DOS
is easily installed on the INTEL X86 PC ?
>> AND LEAVES PLEANTY OF FREE
>> SPACE ON THE 20 MB HARD DISK
Your first accurate statement.
>> (If the user bothered to install it (or
>> even buy a HD) instead of simply running it off of floppy) AND JUST
>> PLAIN ALL AROUND BETTER THAN ANY SOFTWARE EVER DEVELOPED OR COMPILED FOR
>> LINUX RUNNING ON MODERN HARDWARE.
Bullshit.
>>
>> LINUX DEVELS ARE INCONCEIVABLY BAD.
Howso ?
>>
>> DOS does not run properly on modern hardware. =~(
??
--
Kind Regards from Terry
My Desktop is powered by GNU/Linux.
Free Micro Burner http://w3w.arafuraconnect.com.au/~tp/burn.html
** Registration Number: 103931, http://counter.li.org **
codewarrior
Let Alan use his DOS OS then...
I'll stay with my Linux, Apache, SendMail, Qmail, Perl,
GCC,C++,ZEBRA,ROUTED, Samba, etc. etc.
It is clear to see that Alan should not be using Linux anyways. He is safer
with DOS.
"Alan Grimes" <alang...@starpower.net> wrote in message
news:3BBE211F...@starpower.net...
Martman
don't use dos because they want the eye candy and the mulitmedia functions
of today's os. Whether it be free or proprietery quit trying to compare
apples to oranges. I use Windows primarily because I don't want to invest
the time into Linux. Linux hasn't proved to me that it can support my
functions. Not saying they are not available but the work involved in
getting them and using them is beyond the time I am willing to spend. I can
achieve the same goal in Windows much faster. But this is mainly due to my
knowledge in Windows.
But DOS?? I don't think so. Wake up and smell the coffee. If DOS was that
good then Microsoft wouldn't have abandoned it.
Martman
"codewarrior" <codew...@metrowerks.com> wrote in message
news:lwlx7.27383$xy1.2...@news20.bellglobal.com...
codewarrior
Unix...Woohahaaa...
So make us a
vpn/bridge-router/webserver/ipsec/samba/macintosh/fax/novell/ipmasq/
server/EGP/OSPF
Router and Server in DOS!!
Woohaaaaaa..
Alan is so new he puts the 'new' in newbie...
/teddy