Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Tilting At Windmills

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Ralph McGehee

unread,
Oct 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/8/99
to
additive.txt

Bob\

unread,
Oct 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/30/99
to
Yes. Of late my friends are noting the parallel between
Quolde Warrior Quixote and allopathic meds attacking
their favorite symptoms. Nixon declared war on cancer and
drugs, Clinton on cigarettes, Congress on Monicagate.

Congress tilted at windbags, but the Ruby Ridge and Waco
perps and malefactor-in-chief of www.wwatergate.com
and Chinagate and Train Deaths got away. War on guns produces
gangs, war on retrovirus kills with AZT knocking out thymidine
production. Counter- terror was stalking MLK. Nixon's drug war
emphasized treatment, but that was not George Bush or Lucien
Conein's job description, so drug war became another trojan horse
for nascent secret government. Ooops, mixed a metaphor there,
let's saysay tilting at windmills is some little Huk war charade
with Lansdale's windmill has Quixote looking good to himself in
the TV mirror(a controlled press is a mirror--no feedback!) as he
jousts from a gift horse, but then we have that victorious lone crazed
jouster sneaking his wheeled wooden horse into the city under cover
of insanity(electioneering folly).

Lansdale's first-generation free-lunch was digging up part of
Japanese emporer Hirihito's gold after WWII. Next free-lunch
was fake Huk wars advertising the competence of Magsaysay
in the Philippines. That was tilting at windmills because the
war was fake, and also because Magsaysay would have been
elected without Lansdale--Magsaysay elected Quixote Lansdale
to a job in Vietnam. Lansdale tilted at windmills again, starting
up a fake Huk war by attacking the demographic groups and
reversing the merit system in the military leadership, handing
off to a crew of reverse-merit bozos. He had to kill JFK to cover
up the Castle Grande Texas colonia windmill farm. DIA-Dope,
heroin-in-body-bags, another free-lunch, CIA-Crack, another,
catering the next jousting match, war on drugs.

It's no use tilting at thumb-twiddlers, though a thousand can
stir up a breeze. It's the noids who tap the tube.

-B

                     Tilting At Windmills

     With the current need by our government to fight International
Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Drugs, and other threats --
outlined in various official pronouncements and in the upcoming speech
by DCI Tenet "21 Century Intelligence Challenges," -- we should applaud
all efforts to successfully meet those threats.

   Unfortunately the CIA is led by a Cold Warrior unable to see how
to correct [his intelligence failures] the problems and who instead
holds on to the past. "Who did we recruit and what difference will it
make?" is how he opens each morning's staff meeting -- when the emphasis
on recruitment's and the inevitable lying it generates, has dumbed down
the Agency in the past and now will continue to do so into the 21 Century.

   Numerous commentary, including some by CIA personnel and scholars,
decry this phenomenon, yet the dumbed down Directorate of Operations (DO),
and other elements carry the day. The CIA will never meet the challenges
of the 21st Century until it accepts these realities and moves to alter
its future. I have little faith that Tenet, or anyone else now in the CIA's
leadership, understand the problems or can or will devise solutions. Tenet
seems to be the lapdog of Congressional Neanderthals and writes intelligence
to satisfy that learned constancy.

Ralph McGehee   http://come.to/CIABASE

          From CIABASE Web Site Front Page (Edited for Length)

     CIA is not now nor has ever been a central intelligence agency.
     It is the covert action arm of the president's foreign policy
     advisers. In that capacity it overthrows or supports foreign
     governments while reporting "intelligence" justifying those
     activities. It shapes its intelligence, even in such critical
     areas as Soviet nuclear weapon capability, to support
     presidential policy. Disinformation is a large part of its covert
     action responsibility, and the American people are the primary
     target audience of its lies." - Ralph McGehee

     "CIABASE remains a one-of-a-kind, extraordinary resource for
     serious scholars, journalists, and researchers, regardless of
     their political leanings and research interests."
                   - John Macartney, American University

     "Essentially the CIA stopped all accurate info on Vietnam
     while conducting a propaganda campaign to keep us in this
     war that was unwinnable. If we are to avoid further "Vietnams" we
     need a good, reliable, trustworthy intelligence service."

                          Neanderthal Intelligence

     Mary McGrory in a Washington Post (10/7/99 A3) article noted the
     buddy-binding over the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty between the
     Know-Nothings of the Senate and the Know-Nothings of the CIA.

     She notes that Majority Leader Trent Lott supposedly saw the
     wisdom of ramming the bill [an anti-Comprehensive Test Ban
     Treaty] through the Senate after he heard from the Cold War
     mascot agency, the CIA, that certain low-yield atomic tests could
     not be definitively monitored.

     The CIA is revered by the Know-Nothings of the Senate. The agency
     may have missed the demise of the Soviet Union and gotten the
     address of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade wrong, but it thrills
     the reactionaries to be led up to the Senate attic and told
     secrets--like the one that low-yield explosions are hard to
     judge--that give them cover to vote against things they were
     going to vote against anyway.

                 A Historical Whitewash (To a Large Degree)

     Researchers and relatives of victims of human rights abuses in
     Chile charged CIA is withholding information about its covert
     operations in that country, contrary to a White House directive.

     The National Archives is expected to make public hundreds of
     documents from the State Department, Pentagon and CIA relating to
     the military rule of Chilean Gen. Augusto Pinochet. But not any
     information about the CIA's involvement in a 1973 coup against
     Chilean President Salvador Allende or its support for Pinochet.

     Peter Kornbluh, a researcher at the National Security Archive,
     said CIA seems to have adopted a narrow interpretation of the
     administration's declassification directive. "Not a single word
     about CIA operations in support of the Pinochet regime" has been
     released -- "This is a whitewash of history, pure and simple."

     Moreover, the CIA succeeded in pulling back hundreds of documents
     on Chile discovered in the files of the Nixon White House. "These
     are the documents which detail the history of U.S. covert
     operations to foment chaos and violence inn Chile. And there's
     only one reason to withhold them--to continue to cover up this
     history." - Washington Post 10/7/99 A28.

     The "To a Large Degree," relates to a study produced by the
     Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to
     Intelligence Activities, United States Senate dated 1975 --
     entitled "Covert Action In Chile 1963-1973." This report includes
     some information on CIA operations to overthrow Allende. In 1976
     I acquired a copy of the report that now may have disappeared
     from the Committee's holdings.

                          History Teaches Us?

     Beginning shortly after World War Two, the United States
     supported an imported regime in Vietnam that ultimately led to
     the trauma of the Vietnam War. As a consequences of this war, the
     narcotics traffic in Vietnam and surrounding countries -- the
     Golden Triangle -- grew enormously -- accounting for majority of
     percentages of heroin and opium entering the United States. The
     war itself grew to such bitter proportions that it threatened the
     existence of our own form of government.

     Beginning in the early eighties we began supporting the
     Afghanistan Mujehedin, to fight what was estimated to be a
     massive Soviet push -- (our bad intelligence did not recognize
     the soon death of the USSR). Along with this CIA-supported
     Mujehedin, we created generations of new terrorists. Sadly our
     do-goodism created the Golden Crescent -- a new melange of
     countries exporting the majority percentages of heroin and opium
     entering the United States.

     Now we are told that we must fight the new drug threat by
     supporting a narco-terrorist counterinsurgency in Colombia. From
     that traffic, they tell us, 70 to 80 percent of the narcotics
     entering the U.S., emanates. Can this new war generate massive
     new percentages of drugs -- 170% to 180% -- flooding our shores?

     I fear that the new war on drugs will create agonies for the
     United States. What will be the impact of this narco-war on the
     streets of Los Angeles? I predict that this new war on drugs will
     enflame the entire region. Would it not be wise now, before the
     new war gets out of hand, to reconsider our policies. What does
     history teach us?

                       Colombia & DCI Tenet

     In Colombia, one major consideration is how an increase in
     United States military involvement in Colombia reflects the
     Vietnam War. The population numbers of the two countries are
     similar, and the existence of revolutionary movements somewhat
     similar. How heavily have these movements organized that
     population? In Vietnam the Communists organized millions of South
     Vietnamese who committed themselves totally to their victory --
     while our intelligence blinded itself and counted only a
     fraction. Are we doing this again in Colombia?

     Another major issue is the Colombian military which is corrupt,
     supports drug traffickers and sponsors death squads. Can such an
     organization demand the loyalty of the people and the unquestioning
     support of the United States? Does this not mirror Vietnam realities?

     Lastly, David Ignatius in a Op-ed piece asks the question how
     George Tenet is doing as DCI. He in writing the article
     apparently had the assistance of the CIA's staff. Yet in his
     piece there is no mention at all of analysis, analysts, etc.
     Tenet focuses entirely on operations and recruitment's -- the road
     to all the disasters of the past. Tenet opens each morning's staff
     meeting with the question -- who did we recruit and what difference
     will it make?

     To me the lack of analysis -- 1% -- one percent -- of the
     intelligence budget is allocated for all-source intelligence.
     This figure reflects his approach and foresees many more and
     possibly more disastrous intelligence failures under his reign.

                      "Spinning The American Public."

     A former senior Clinton Administration official charged that the
     new multi-agency plan to control the dissemination of information
     abroad is aimed at "spinning the American public."

     Presidential Decision Directive 68, ordered the creation of the
     International Public Information (IPI) system -- and said
     "information aimed at the U.S. audience should be coordinated
     integrated, deconflicted and synchronized with the IPI to achieve
     a synergistic effect." PDD 68 does not distinguish between what
     would be done overseas and what would be done at home... it talks
     about a news war...The target is the American people." Washington
     Times 7/29/99 A1.

     PDD 68 orders top officials from the Defense, State, Justice,
     Commerce, and Treasury and the CIA and FBI to meet and set up a
     core group. Coordinating this massive agglomeration will
     inevitable produce fact-blindness especially when you include the
     misinformation operations of the CIA. If there is any plan to
     distinguish fact from fiction, IPI should know about CIA
     deception operations -- but CIA will never reveal those details
     to anyone.

     One major role for the CIA is the creation of false evidence to
     support its operations -- it refuses to share those details with
     other agencies. Internally it even restricts details of such
     operations using strict need-to-know and compartmentation
     policies. So when it conducts many and massive deception
     operations those deceits inevitably will end up in the domestic
     media and will shape our foreign policies. With the creation of
     the IPI these stories will be disseminated world-wide and
     especially domestically.

     What are some types of CIA False Evidence operations? The CIA
     forges documents and places them where they will be discovered
     and disseminated widely. (It effectively demonizes targets even
     the most honorable while glorifying sponsored "demons"). It sets
     off bombs, blaming them on targets. It plants "Communist" or now
     probably "terrorist" weapons shipments and arranges for them to
     be found as it broadcasts details of such widely.

     It buys foreign media and employees and book publishers,
     establishes policy-making think tanks and their publications, it
     employs foreign radio and television stations -- all used to
     disseminate its deceits.

     As one example -- It kept the media riveted for months as it told
     of Cuban troops in Angola raping Ovimbundu girls. The villagers
     were outraged, captured the Cubans, and over a period of months
     held a trial, proclaimed them guilty and then executed the Cubans
     with their own weapons -- the only thing wrong with the story was
     that it was all made up.

     Doctored photographs, false atrocity stories, falsely attributed
     scholarly books written criticizing or blaming this or that
     movement or target (over 1000 titles published in one period)
     make up more of its arsenal of lies. Its operations in academia
     sponsor or subvert thousands of domestic academicians and untold
     numbers of foreign academics. It also sponsors numerous
     politicians and their groups and media operations. (One sample of
     the massive nature of the deceptions it employs can be found
     here, those it used in Chile and they led to the empowerment of
     Pinochet.)

     I have had a number of experiences with the disinformation/
     deception operations. Perhaps the most pervasive and destructive
     were CIA lies re Vietnam from 1950 through 1998. But I found that
     it also lied most effectively in its intelligence and -- in the
     facts that it suppressed.

     So this is what the American people can expect under the new IPI.
     To appreciate its terrible power I recommend reading George
     Orwell's classic "1984."

     Details of a group similar to IPI in the Reagan Administration
     that was declared illegal.

                    DCI Tenet Claims Responsibility

     DCI Tenet told Congress yesterday that he takes "ultimate
     responsibility" for the accidental bombing of the Chinese Embassy
     in Belgrade and promised to change the Agency's procedures to
     ensure that such a mistake cannot happen again. Tenet attributed
     the error to poor targeting procedures, inadequate review and
     faulty databases. "It was a major error," Tenet told the House
     Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. "I cannot minimize
     the significance of this." The Yugoslav Directorate of Supply and
     Procurement was the first target "unilaterally proposed and
     wholly assembled" by CIA. Tenet also gave new details about a
     mid-level intelligence analyst who challenged the targeting data
     before the airstrike. Washington Post 7/23/99 A16.

     A recent Admiral Jeremiah report followed up and concluded the
     CIA needed to be scrubbed from the top to bottom. A departing
     (conservative) case officer recorded the devastating
     intellectual inability's of the leadership of the CIA's
     Directorate of Operations.

     A number of high-level analysts left the CIA and wrote of its
     terrible intelligence. For example see: Lost Promise: How CIA
     Analysis Misserves the Nation by John A. Gentry. A former top Soviet
     affairs analyst, Melvin Goodwin, decries the CIA's analytical inability's.

     Yet from his first days, Tenet ignored the CIA's analytical needs
     and pushed ahead with his own non-intellectual tack. He called
     for increased operations and dismayingly overtly discussed his
     plans for increased covert actions against China.

     Contributing to the CIA's intelligence failures are the inability's
     of its Directorate of Operations. We have official testimony re
     Cuba's DGI running the Agency's entire stable of Cuban double
     agents, East Germany's STASI than ran hundreds if not thousands
     of CIA double agents; and, the KGB's known double agents loyal to
     the USSR who duped the CIA into reporting falsely on the Soviet
     Union's "super" weapons of mass destruction. Echoing these
     unbelievable (in the full meaning of that term) failures, is the
     CIA's dissemination of "intelligence" from a known Chinese double
     agent that documented the Cox report's conclusions and the
     negative impact of those on our national security.

     At this web site I include a number of recommendations on how to
     improve the CIA's performance -- using many examples taken from
     my own experience.

                              Know-Nothing's

     It is obvious that the CIA is in the midst of a major officer
     recruiting campaign that will determine the future of that
     institution for the next few decades.

     In a number of articles I have quoted from case officers, to a
     director, to an Inspector General, all on the general state of
     disaster in the CIA -- its morale, procedures, operations and the
     deficiencies of its personnel -- most at the top of the
     Directorate of Operations (DO).

     These did not happen out of the mists -- the CIA in the past (and
     probably also now) has used psychological testing criteria to
     recruit the naive, the innocent, the team-player and the not too
     academically outstanding, to man its outposts. (In my case I and
     a large number of recruits came directly out of the manpower pool
     of rejected NFL hopefuls). It does not want the person who can
     see the implications of its actions. It wants the "know-nothing"
     who believes, or as the chant says, "I don't know and I don't
     care." It wants the "operator" not the intellect.

     Since leaving the CIA I have written a book, and began compiling
     a data base on relevant information about the CIA. As I processed
     information into the data base I was stunned to see the universal
     failure of its intelligence over the past fifty plus years.

     In short I discovered that the CIA used its intelligence as a
     means of bolstering its operations, while avoiding any data that
     challenged such goals.

     The CIA universally supported and supports militarized regimes
     around the world, and in so doing implicates itself in the work
     of death squads, drug smugglers, terrorists and other less than
     desirable elements. In so doing, it has destroyed many future
     "George Washington's."

     But now the situation is somewhat different. We are faced with
     international terrorism, there is a real need for real
     information, but you have against that need, the know-nothings of
     the DO and the know-nothings of other segments of the CIA.

     Do we want an operational or an intelligence agency?

     I should note the personal harassment that increases with my
     efforts to inform -- this in spite of the fact that CIA has
     written me numerous letters I may use any information in the
     public domain. -  Letter from CIA's Publications Review Board

                             Table of Contents

 Introduction                         Intelligence & Operational Analysis
 Covert action in Chile 1963-73       A model operation
 CIA's Paramilitary Operations        Apocalypse now revisited
 CIA trained assassins                The ends justify the means?
 How to counter terrorism             An Updated Suggestion
 CIA Support For Terrorism            Support for Guatemalan Ops
 Disembling, Deception & Lies         Domestic propaganda operations
 The CIA's Illegal Domestic Ops       Subverting Academia & the Media
 Intelligence Failure in Vietnam      CIA disinformation kept us in the war
 The Vietnam War                      More about the war
 CIA personnel requirements           A bizarre recruiting poster
 "Deadly Deceits"                     Excerpts from Ralph's book
 Past, Present & Future               Economic intelligence & espionage
 Past, Present & Future Part II       "We divide the world in two..."
 Congress against the CIA             "Limited analytical capabilities"
 The Bay of Pigs Fiasco               "Ignorant, Arrogant and Incompetent"
 Indian nuclear test                  The CIA was caught unawares
 Chase Manhattan memo on Chiapas      Eliminate the Zapitistas!
 The CIA & the Price of Dissent       Ralph's struggle with the CIA
 The CIA is in "Deep rot"             "Needs to be scrubbed" from the top down
 CIA sex discrimination               CIA use & abuse of women
 Paramilitary Operation in China      Next stop - Beijing


--

druggingamerica.com More FunThan A Tom Clancy Novel

ciadrugs.co m

unfriendlyskies.com

college of crime
 

Aozotorp

unread,
Oct 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/30/99
to
>Ooops, mixed a metaphor there,
>let's saysay tilting at windmills is some little Huk war charade
>with Lansdale's windmill has Quixote looking good to himself in
>the TV mirror(a controlled press is a mirror--no feedback!) as he
>jousts from a gift horse, but then we have that victorious lone crazed
>jouster sneaking his wheeled wooden horse into the city under cover
>of insanity(electioneering folly).
>
>Lansdale's first-generation free-lunch was digging up part of
>Japanese emporer Hirihito's gold after WWII. Next free-lunch
>was fake Huk wars advertising the competence of Magsaysay
>in the Philippines. That was tilting at windmills because the
>war was fake, and also because Magsaysay would have been
>elected without Lansdale--Magsaysay elected Quixote Lansdale
>to a job in Vietnam. Lansdale tilted at windmills again, starting
>up a fake Huk war by attacking the demographic groups and
>reversing the merit system in the military leadership, handing
>off to a crew of reverse-merit bozos. He had to kill JFK to cover
>up the Castle Grande Texas colonia windmill farm. DIA-Dope,
>heroin-in-body-bags, another free-lunch, CIA-Crack, another,
>catering the next jousting match, war on drugs.

Well you can go read James Hamilton-Paterson's "America's Boy: A Century of
Colonialism in the Philippines" on this! And Oh Yes, Read about Ole Col.
Napoleon Valeriano a psychotic Killer there who was soon transfered to S.
Vietnam to create death and Mayhem over there!

0 new messages