Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

RI-948i Leonardo da Vinci not liked by L. Ron Hubbard

17 views
Skip to first unread message

Koos Nolst Trenite

unread,
Nov 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM11/3/97
to mail...@news.news.demon.net
RI-948I.ASC

Tom Apple

unread,
Nov 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM11/4/97
to

Koos Nolst Trenite (Koos.T...@trenite.de) wrote:
: 30 September 1997
: issued 3 November 1997


: RI-948i 'Leonardo da Vinci not liked by L. Ron Hubbard'


I'm sure Da Vinci is really tore up about it too.


Warum stellst du diese unwichtige Nachtricht hier? Glaubst du eigentlich,
den Scheisse aus Hubbard? Ich hoffe nicht. Diesen Newsgruppen sind fuer
Geschichte und Kultur, nicht Phantasie.


Tom Apple

Michele Sciam

unread,
Nov 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM11/4/97
to

Excuse me but I thought that one of the most important ingredient of any
cultural expression was fantasy...and I wish it was also for history...
Maybe I am wrong...
Mit freundlichen Gruessen aus Rom
Michele Sciam
>

Christopher D. Kimball

unread,
Nov 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM11/5/97
to

I agree. That original post was usless bandwith that had nothing to do
with the living history newsgroups. (And what was the point of all of
that hubbard fantasies?) I don't think that it mentioned about hubbard's
belief that we are all descended from space aliens, and that if we spend
enough money in the scientology church, than we can get in contact with
our inner space alien being.

Marian Rosenberg

unread,
Nov 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM11/5/97
to

Christopher D. Kimball wrote:

> I agree. That original post was usless bandwith that had nothing to do
> with the living history newsgroups. (And what was the point of all of
> that hubbard fantasies?) I don't think that it mentioned about hubbard's
> belief that we are all descended from space aliens, and that if we spend
> enough money in the scientology church, than we can get in contact with
> our inner space alien being.

Hubbard didn't actually BELIEVE in Scientology. There was a famous
conversation held in a science fiction convention (I believe it was a
WorldCon) suite back in the 70's (I think) in which L.Ron Hubbard told
John Campbell and Asimov that the best way to make money was to creat a
religion, and so Scientology was born. Numerous people claim to have
been there when the conversation took place, but if everybody who says
they were there, was there the room would have had a few thousand people
in it.

Dick Wisan

unread,
Nov 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM11/8/97
to

In article <346296...@visi.net>, ead...@visi.net says...

>
>Marian Rosenberg wrote:
>
>
>> Hubbard didn't actually BELIEVE in Scientology. There was a famous
>> conversation held in a science fiction convention (I believe it was a
>> WorldCon) suite back in the 70's (I think) in which L.Ron Hubbard told
>> John Campbell and Asimov that the best way to make money was to creat a
>> religion, and so Scientology was born. Numerous people claim to have
>> been there when the conversation took place, but if everybody who says
>> they were there, was there the room would have had a few thousand people
>> in it.
>
>Ahhh..they were all there..they were just co-inhabiting the same bodies
>(grin).

My memory is that Dianetics began (as far as I was seeing it in ASF)
mainly as a kind of psychotherapy. In time, however, there was
trouble about practicing medicine without a license, so it turned into
a religion, where you don't need a license.

--
R. N. (Dick) Wisan - Email: wis...@norwich.net
- Snail: 37 Clinton Street, Oneonta NY 13820, U.S.A.
- Just your opinion, please, ma'am: No fax.


0 new messages