VI:My Lai and Tet 1968 Offensive Massacres
Truo+`ngSo+n
Chi. DC a`.
Chi. kho?e kho^ng, chi. pha?i post nhie^`u ba`i ho+n nu+~a.
Ho^m na`o mo+`i chi. ghe' SJSU cho*i.
TRUONGSON.
V
Vietnam Insight
Published Sunday, March 29, 1998, in the San Jose Mercury News
*****************************
One gesture deserves another
*****************************
S. Vietnamese have waited 30 years for communists to repent for
atrocities
"The Tet massacre was not an isolated incident like My Lai. It was
not a mistake by a small group of soldiers and their commanders
but the execution of a calculated policy of raining terror on the
South Vietnamese people by the communist war machinery, a
surprise attack in the middle of the most sacred moments of the
Vietnamese people."
BY PATRICK PHU LE
RECENTLY, the United States honored the three servicemen who
helped stop the atrocities at My Lai and transported the wounded
to medical facilities. It was a meaningful decision carried out
in good faith to express U.S. concerns for mistakes committed
during the Vietnam war, and as an American citizen, I am very
pleased by this action.
Vietnam's communist propaganda machinery did not spare the
opportunity to jump on the bandwagon and announce they welcome
this decision even though it is overdue. Better late than never,
they said.
But as a Vietnamese-American and a resident of Hue during the
Viet Cong's massacre of more than 6,000 civilians -- known in
this country as the Tet offensive -- it is very legitimate for me
to pose a question to the Vietnamese communists: ``We have done
our part, when are you going to do yours?''
Thirty years have passed, and a trial of those responsible for
the massacre of immense cruelty is well overdue. The U.S.
military court convicted and punished those involved in My Lai.
But the Vietnamese communist government has not even acknowledged
that the event known in Vietnam as Mau Than Tet -- Tet of the
Year of the Monkey -- was wrong. It hurt not only thousands of
innocent Hue civilians, but also the South Vietnamese people in
general, on the verge of withdrawal from Hue and numerous cities
all ove r South Vietnam.
I was 18 at the time and lost many of my classmates and teachers.
Their bodies were found among thousands of Hue residents in huge
communal holes discovered soon after the Viet Cong retreated from
Hue. The victims' heads were crushed by savage blows and their
hands were tied by barbed wire.
And they had nothing to do with the South Vietnamese regime; they
were just civilians without any means to defend themselves.
Images of my teachers' and classmates' violent deaths followed me
for years. Like any 18-year-old, I looked forward to a hopeful
future and could not imagine how such atrocities could ever
happen. For a long time after the ordeal, I was in doubt of the
true meaning of life. Vietnamese communists still owe me and
other South Vietnamese who had their relatives executed in the
Tet offen sive an explanation for their actions.
But I doubt the Vietnamese communists will ever do their part in
apologizing for the crimes against humanity they committed 30
years ago. They never will take any actions for a simple reason:
The Tet massacre was not an isolated incident like My Lai. It was
not a mistake by a small group of soldiers and their commanders
but the execution of a calculated policy of raining terror on the
South Vietnamese people by the communist war machinery, a
surprise attack in the middle of the most sacred moments of the
Vietnamese people. To bring those responsible to justice would
be putting the whole communist regime on trial. That's something
Vietnamese communists could not do and will never do.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Phu Le, Ph.D., is an activist in the San Jose
Vietnamese-American community.
--
---
Vietnam Insight (vins...@best.com)
URL: http://www.vinsight.org/
hbui.v...@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
A street girl who sells off her flesh is called a prostitute.
An intellectual with the tittle of bac si~ or tie^'n si~ who sells out his
brain is called ...a brain prostitute.
You know damn well that the massacre of the rural population in South
Vietnam and their forced evacuation is not an accidental by-product of the
Vietnam war. Rather it is of the very essence of American strategy.
The theory behind it has been explained with great clarity and
explicitness by Prof Samuel Huntington, Chairman of the Government
Department at Harvard and at the time (1968), Chairman of the Council on
Vietnamese Studies of the Southeast Asia Development Advisory Group,
ultimately responsible to the State Department.
Writing in Foreign Affairs, Prof Huntington explains that the Vietcong is
a powerful force which cannot be dislodged from its constituency so long
as the constituency continues to exist.
His conclusion is obvious and he does not shrinkle from it, "We can ensure
that the constituency ceases to exist by direct application of mechanical
and conventional power on such a massive scale as to produce a massive
migration from countryside to city" , where the Vietcong constituency, the
rural population, can, it is hoped, be controlled in refugees camps and in
suburban slums of big cities.
"One thing is clear", he continues, "as long as an organized social life
can be maintained in South Vietnam, the NLF will be powerful, probably a
dominant force. This is the dilemna which has always plagued American
policy and which has made it impossible for us to permit even the most
rudimentary democratic institution in South Vietnam."
For these reasons, the US has been forced to apply the solution outlined
by Prof. Huntington: to crush the people's war, the US must eliminate the
people.
vietcong
nguy...@hotmail.com
In article <6fujiu$qn0$1...@nntp1.ba.best.com>,
Vietnam Insight <vins...@shell3.ba.best.com> wrote:
>
>
> Published Sunday, March 29, 1998, in the San Jose Mercury News
>
> *****************************
> One gesture deserves another
> *****************************
>
>From: Vietnam Insight <vins...@shell3.ba.best.com>
>Date: Wed, Apr 1, 1998 18:45 EST
>Message-id: <6fujiu$qn0$1...@nntp1.ba.best.com>
>
>Published Sunday, March 29, 1998, in the San Jose Mercury
>News
>
>***************************** One gesture deserves another
>*****************************
>
>S. Vietnamese have waited 30 years for communists to repent
>for atrocities
>
Xin go'p mo^.t tie^'ng no'i cho quy' vi. ddo.c tie^'ng Vie^.t - The^?
theo go'p y' cu?a co^ Thuy' Vi ...
------------------------------------------------------------------
30-4-75, va` Ma^.u Tha^n - To^.i Die^.t Chu?ng cu?a CSVN
Tra^.n Ma^.u Tha^n na(m 1968 - Va`o giu+~a dde^m giao thu+`a
ngay chi'nh gio+` phu't linh thie^ng cu?a dde^m tru+` ti.ch,
mo.i ngu+o+`i ddang an ta^m vui hu+o+?ng ddo'n xua^n vi` tin
tu+o+?ng va`o hie^.p u+o+'c ngu+ng ba('n thi` qua^n CSBV va`
MTGPMN ddo^`ng loa.t no^?i da^.y ta^'n co^ng mo.i tha`nh
pho^' trong toa`n co~i mie^`n Nam VN. Trong so^' a^'y.
tha`nh Pho^' Hue^' bi. bo.n CS chie^'m ddo'ng va` kie^?m
soa't trong vo`ng 26 nga`y. 26 nga`y a^'y, ngu+o+`i da^n
Hue^' dda~ ne^'m mu`i thu` ha^.n . Ho. dda~ so^'ng trong
tang thu+o+ng, kinh hoa`ng va` dda^`y so+. ha~i . Dda^'t
tha^`n kinh no^?i tie^'ng ve^` trang nghie^m co^? ki'nh
vo+'i ca'c ddi`nh chu`a va` gio`ng so^ng Hu+o+ng lu+~ng lo+`
bo^~ng mo^.t so+'m chie^`u tro+? ne^n u a'm , sa(.c mu`i
tu+? khi'. No+i ca'c khu vu+.c ddi`nh chu`a, la(ng ta^?m,
chu?ng vie^.n ! Nhu+~ng no+i cho^'n trang nghie^m a^'y
tro+? ne^n o^ ue^', tang thu+o+ng vi` no+i da^y ghi ha(`n
ve^'t ti'ch tha?m sa't cu?a ha`ng nga`n ngu+o+`i da^n vo^
to^.i bi. cho^n so^'ng ha`ng loa.t do qua^n CS ga^y ra -
Ga^`n 3000 ngu+o+`i qua^n da^n ca'n chi'nh , bi. qua^n CS
kha't ma'u ddie^.u ddi thanh toa'n. Co' no+i ho. bi. cho^n
so^'ng ta^.p the^? ra^'t da~ man trong nhie^`u ddi.a ddie^?m
- Co' no+i khi tha^n nha^n ti`m ra , Nhu+~ng tha^y ngu+o+`i
che^'t si`nh tu+`ng chu`m di'nh vo+'i nhau ba(`ng 1 so+.i
gia^y ke~m gai du`i thu?ng qua ca'c ba`n tay (xin nha('c
la.i, ca'c mu ba`n tay bi. du`i thu?ng va` xa^u va`o nhau
ba(`ng gia^y ke~m gai chu+' tay kho^ng bi. tro'i tay trong
lu'c ddie^.u ho. ddi!!!). - Qua^n CS la`m the^' dde^? da^n
chu'ng kho^ng ai cha.y thoa't cho no^?i ! - Co' no+i, da^n
chu'ng bi. lu`a ddu+'ng ha`ng loa.t tre^n ge^`nh tha'c,
ga^`n 500 sinh ma.ng bi. xu+? tu+? ba(`ng dda.n dda.i lie^n
dde^? tha^y ho. bi. ro+i xuo^'ng con suo^'i be^n du+o+'i va`
mu.c na't theo gio`ng nu+o+'c vo^ ti`nh !!! Dda^u dda^u,
tha`nh pho^' Hue^' cu~ng dda^`y da^~y nhu+~ng ve^'t ti'ch
tang thu+o+ng, sa(.c mu`i tu+? khi' , che^'t cho'c !
Ngu+o+`i Da^n Hue^' va` nha^'t la` ca'c sinh vie^n ho.c sinh
lu'c ba^'y gio+` mo+'i hie^?u y' nghi~a ca^u : "...Ma(.t
dda^'t bao la, anh em ta ve^`, ga(.p nhau , mu+`ng nhu+ ba~o
ca't quay cuo^`ng, tro+`i ro^.ng, bie^?n xanh, so^ng ga^'m,
no^'i lie^`n 1 vo`ng tu+? sinh ..." ddu+o+.c tung ra ma^'y
tha'ng tru+o+'c ddo' dde^? chua^?n bi. ca'i gi` nhu+ng dda~
tre^~. Ddo`n tri' va^.n a^'y bo.n CS dda~ cho ca'c tay sai
va(n nghe^. tung ra ho`ng chua^?n bi. ta^m ly' ky~ ca`ng cho
qua^`n chu'ng tru+o+'c khi dda'nh chie^'m mie^`n Nam!!!
*** XE'T VE^` CU+O+`NG DDO^. TA`N A'C : Ngu+o+`i CS co' o'c
cuo^`ng sa't, ba.o ha`nh . Gie^'t ngu+o+`i, ddo^'i vo+'i
qua^n CS cu~ng pha?i tha^.t la` cu+.c ky` da~ man va` ta`n
ba.o . Pha?i ha`nh ha. ddi.ch thu? cho dau ddo+'n, tho^'ng
kho^? dde^'n to^.t cu`ng ve^` the^? xa'c mo+'i thoa? ma~n
thu' ti'nh da~ man a'c ddo^.c na^`y !!!. -
*** XE'T VE^` TO^.I A'C DIE^.T CHU?NG : Bo.n CS Ba('c Vie^.t va`
MTGPMN dda~ kho^ng nga^`n nga.i nhu'ng tay va`o ma'u mang
to^.i die^.t chu?ng - So sa'nh vo+'i to^.i die^.t chu?ng
cu?a ma^.t vu. Hitler ddo^'i vo+'i ngu+o+`i Do Tha'i thi`
to^.i cu?a bo.n CSVN na(.ng ho+n 1 bu+.c. vi` ngu+o+`i CS
gie^'t ngu+o+`i cu`ng chu?ng to^.c 1 ca'ch co' ti'nh toa'n,
co' chu? tru+o+ng va` co' ke^' hoa.ch !!! Dda^y kho^ng pha?i
la` va^'n dde^` la.c te^n lac. dda.n trong chie^'n tru+o+`ng
ma` la` thu+.c ha`nh tu+`ng bu+o+'c mo^.t theo binh thuye^'t
cu?a bo.n CS. mo^~i khi chie^'m xong 1 tha`nh pho^' ddi.ch .
Ngu+o+`i CS dda~ a'p du.ng theo sa'ch vo+? tu+`ng giai
ddoa.n ra^'t ky~ ca`ng dde^? GIE^'T . Gie^'t sao cho
nhie^`u, gie^'t pha?i ha`ng loa.t va` pha?i gie^'t sao cho
tha^.t ta`n a'c da~ man!. Giai ddoa.n 1: To? ra khoan ho^`ng
dde^? lu+`a phi?nh, da^~n du. qua^`n chu'ng, cho ddi ho.c
ta^.p va`i nga`y ro^`i tha? ve^` . Giai ddoa.n 2 : Thanh
lo.c - Giai ddoa.n 3 : Ta^.p ho.p nhu+~ng pha^`n tu+? qua^n
ca'n chi'nh tha^.t ddo^ng dda?o dde^? gie^'t !
30 na(m dda~ qua, chu+'ng ti'ch li.ch su+? co`n ddo' .
Nhie^`u nha^n chu+'ng so^'ng dda~ qua ddu+o+.c the^' gio+'i
tu+. do va^~n co`n ddo' dde^? no'i le^n cho toa`n the^'
gio+'i bie^'t to^.i a'c cu?a con ngu+o+`i CSVN. The^' ma`
bo.n ngu+o+`i CS co`n huye^nh hoang to^? chu+'c "a(n mu+`ng
chie^'n tha('ng Ma^.u Tha^n !!! " Bo.n CSVN co' bie^.t ta`i
cha` dda.p lu+o+ng ta^m va` co^' bie^'n hoa' li.ch su+?
dde^? ru+?a to^.i cho dda?ng va` lu+o+ng ta^m ho. , nhu+ng
ngu+o+`i da^n kinh tha`nh Hue^' la`m sao que^n ddu+o.c ve^'t
tang sa^u dda^.m na`y trong lo`ng ho. - Ba.n tre? ha~y ti`m
ddo.c "Gia?i kha(n so^ cho Hue^' cu?a Nha~ Ca" dde^? bie^'t
su+. thu+.c ta`n kho^'c dde^'n mu+'c na`o . The^' ma` bo.n
CS co`n la^'p lie^'m no'i ve^` vu. tha?m sa't ta.i Hue^'
ra(`ng : Ddo' chi? la` sai so^' trong li.ch su+? ! Ta.i sao
ha`nh ha. gie^'t qua' nhie^`u ngu+o+`i trong ca'c tra.i ca?i
ta.o sau 30-4-75 ? - Ddo' cu~ng chi? la` sai so^' li.ch su+?
!!! - Ta.i sao gie^'t qua' nhie^`u ngu+o+`i trong ca?i ca'ch
ruo^.ng dda^'t ? Ddo' la` sai so^' li.ch su+? !!! Sao co'
qua' nhie^`u ngu+o+`i che^'t trong "chie^'n di.ch su+?a sai"
? - Ddo' la` sai so^' li.ch su+? !!! - Co' qua' nhie^`u sai
so^' li.ch su+? tra?i da`i tu+` 1945 ~ 1980 ma` ngu+o+`i CS
va^~n li` lo+.m ngang nhie^n no'i nhu+ the^' ! Loa.i
thie^`m thu+` thoa't xa'c bi. cha^'t va^'n thi` tra? lo+`i
ra(`ng : Ba.n chi? hie^?u co' 1/2 ma(.t !!! - Lu+u manh,
thu? ddo.an , li` lo+.m va` gia` mo^`m. Ba?n cha^'t bo.n
CSVN la` the^' , ddo' la` ba?n cha^'t cu?a bo.n ddo^` te^?
kha't ma'u ddo^`ng loa.i, uo^'ng ro^`i chu`i kho^ng sa.ch
mie^.ng! Va^.y thi`, du` cho bo.n a^'y co' ddo^.i lo^'t
du+o+'i ba^'t ky` danh nghi~a na`o : Nha` va(n, nha` ba'o,
nha` tho+, trie^'t gia, ly' thuye^'t gia, cu+.u tu` ca?i
ta.o, cu+.u ddo+n vi. tru+o+?ng QLVNCH ? - Kho^ng dda^u -
Ba.n pha?i hie^?u , Ddo' chi? la` loa.i thie^`m thu+` thoa't
xa'c ? Ddo' la` agents cu?a dda?ng - Bo.n thu? tu'c kho^'n
na.n a^'y ddang xua^'t hie^.n tre^n net, trong SCV na`y,
bo.n chu'ng ddang kie^'m ca'ch ru+?a to^.i cho dda?ng va`
ddo^`ng bo.n cu?a chu'ng !!! Bo.n a^'y ddang ti`m ca'ch be^u
xa^'u qua^n lu+.c VNCH, ca'i qua^n lu+.c dda~ gia?i pho'ng
tha`nh pho^' Hue^' 1 ca'ch anh hu`ng dde^? ddu+a ddo^`ng
ba`o tha^n ye^u tro+? ve^` cuo^.c so^'ng ye^n la`nh. Bo.n
a^'y que^n ra(`ng, li.ch su+? la` li.ch su+? ! va` li.ch
su+? ngay tha^.t dde^'n ta`n ba.o . Kho^ng the^? na`o chu'ng
bo^i nho. ddu+o+.c QLVNCH , ma(.c du` ca'i qua^n lu+.c a^'y
dda~ thua vi` su+. bo^.i pha?n he`n nha't cu?a ddo^`ng minh.
Bo'ng da'ng ngu+o+`i li'nh Co^.ng Hoa` ddi dde^'n dda^u ,
da^n chu'ng ye^u thu+o+ng cha.y theo dde^'n ddo' la` mo^.t
ba(`ng chu+'ng hie^?n nhie^n cu. the^? Bo+?i vi` ngu+o+`i
li'nh Co^.ng Hoa` ti`m ca'i che^'t dde^? ba?o ve^. da^n
la`nh, ngu+o+`i li'nh Co^.ng Hoa` da'm la^'y ma.ng mi`nh
dde^? cho ngu+o+`i da^n ddu+o+.c so^'ng, o+? Hue^', o+? Co^?
tha`nh Qua?ng Tri. , tre^n ddu+o+`ng di ta?n QL1 tu+` Qua?ng
tri. va`o Hue^', O+? An Lo^.c , o+? Xua^n Lo^.c va` ngay ca?
va`o nhu+~ng nga`y cuo^'i cu`ng cu?a cuo^.c chie^'n , Ta.i
xa lo^. Bie^n Hoa` , nhu+~ng nga`y 28, 29, 30 tha'ng 4-75
Xa'c nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i li'nh Du` dda~ pho+i pho+'i nga~
xuo^'ng ven ddu+o+`ng dde^? cho da^n Ddo^ Tha`nh ddu+o+.c
ye^n o^?n cha.y loa.n . Ba.n dda~ chu+'ng kie^'n nhu+~ng
ca'i che^'t bi hu`ng dda^`y oanh lie^.t a^'y . Ba.n dda~
tha^'y nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i li'nh a^'y , chie^'n dda^'u dde^'n
gio.t ma'u cuo^'i cu`ng, bi`nh ti~nh, dda^`y ddie^.u nghe^.
va` dde^'n khi he^'t da.n du+o+.c , Ho. dda~ pho+i pho+'i
nga~ xuo^'ng, do.c theo dda.i lo^. Bie^n Hoa`, ngay ta.i
ddu+o+`ng pho^' Sa`igo`n. Ho. che^'t trong su+. ye^u
thu+o+ng cu?a da^n to^.c . Nhu+~ng ca'i che^'t dda^`y bi
tra'ng ha`o hu`ng cu?a ho. dda~ ddu+o+.c chu+'ng kie^'n va`
ddi va`o lo`ng da^n to^.c . - Nhu+~ng nga`y na`y , ga^`n
va`o 30 tha'ng 4 ha(`ng na(m. Kho^ng the^? na`o chu'ng ta
que^n. Ba.n o+i, Xin ha~y ddo^'t 1 ne'n hu+o+ng lo`ng, ca^`u
nguye^.n cho anh linh da^n to^.c , ca^`u nguye^.n cho ca'c
chie^'n si~ Co^.ng Hoa` vo^ danh , dda~ ddo^? ma'u mi`nh ra
cho chu'ng ta ddu+o+.c to^`n ta.i. Ha~y ca^`u nguye^.n cha^n
tha`nh dde^? mai na`y nhu+~ng gio`ng ma'u a^'y dda~ ddo^?
xuo^'ng kho?i pha?i phi' pha.m . Dde^? da^n to^.c ddu+o+.c
thoa't a'ch go^ng cu`m cu?a bo.n quy? ddo? dda^`y thu?
ddoa.n, mie^.ng mo^`m dda^`y ma'u tanh trong 1 nga`y kho^ng
xa.
Xin ddu+`ng phi' pha.m lo`ng tin va`o bo.n ngu+o+`i CS
dda^`y thu? ddoa.n dda^`y ta`n a'c. Chu'ng ta dda~ tin qua'
nhie^`u la^`n va` bi. lu+o+`ng ga.t qua' nhie^`u la^`n bo+?i
ho. Ma^.u tha^n la` mo^.t minh chu+'ng li.ch su+? - Chi'nh
bo.n CS dda~ dda(.t bu't ky' te^n ddo^`ng y' ngu+ng ba('n
va`o di.p Te^'t Ma^.u Tha^n nhu+ng la.i ddo^`ng loa.t no^?i
le^n ba('n gie^'t da^n chu'ng va`o ddu'ng gio+` phu't linh
thie^ng trong dde^m giao thu+`a na(m a^'y tre^n kha('p ma(.t
dda^'t nu+o+'c. Chi'nh bo.n chu'ng dda~ ddo^`ng y' ky' te^n
ngu+ng chie^'n ta.i hie^.p ddi.nh Paris 1972 nhu+ng la.i
ddo^`ng loa.t xua qua^n ba('n gie^'t , dda'nh chie^'m toa`n
co~i VN va`o nga`y 30-4-75 .
Mo+'i dda^y, ngu+o+`i CS la.i do+? thu? ddoa.n, ho. to^?
chu+'c xa^y dda`i ky? nie^.m tha?m sa't ta.i la`ng My~ Lai -
Ho. la`m ru`m beng lo+'n chuye^.n , ho^ hoa'n cho toa`n
the^' gio+'i tha^'y to^.i a'c chie^'n tranh cu?a ngu+o+`i
My~ ba(`ng nhu+~ng he^. tho^'ng tho^ng tin quo^'c te^' nhu+
CNN, ABC, CBS. No+i dda^y li'nh My~ qua tay Trung Uy'
Cailey dda~ tha?m sa't ga^`n 500 ngu+o+`i da^n la`ng vo^
to^.i . La`m nhu+ the^' , ho. dda~ lua^.n xu+? to^.i
ngu+o+`i My~ tru+o+'c lu+o+ng ta^m nha^n loa.i. La`m nhu+
the^' ho. ddo`i cho ddu+o+.c Co^ng Ly' ba(`ng trao ddo^?i
to^'i hue^. quo^'c !. Phi'a ta^y, Toa` a'n My~ cu~ng dda~
xu+? to^.i o^ng trung uy' ddie^n khu`ng Cailey . Co^ng ly'
cu~ng dda~ co' cho^~ ddu+'ng . O+? mo^.t no^`ng ddo^. so
sa'nh giu+~a to^.i a'c chie^'n tranh My~ Lai va` to^.i a'c
die^.t chu?ng Ma^.u Tha^n. Ngu+o+`i vie^'t pha?i no'i ra(`ng
: dda?ng ta dda~ ngo.ng mo^`m im i?m tru+o+'c su+. cha^'t
va^'n cu?a lu+o+ng ta^m da^n to^.c !. Bo.n truye^`n tho^ng
quo^'c te^' o+? dda^u? nhi? Ddi dda^u ca? ro^`i ?! Qua?
ddu'ng la` bo.n ngu! lu+o+ng ta^m thhui cho^.t ! My~ Lai
chi? la` 1 tra'i pha' nho? so vo+'i ha`ng nghi`n tra'i no^?
long tro+`i no^? dda^'t Ma^.u Tha^n ! Kho^ng nhu+~ng ta`n
a'c ma` no' co`n mang ki'ch thu+o+'c cu?a to^.i die^.t
chu?ng ! O^` pha?i ! DDo^'i vo+'i Dda?ng, Ddo' cu~ng chi?
la` sai so^' li.ch su+? !!!
Ca^u ho?i ddu+o+.c dda(.t ra la` : Ta.i sao ho. gie^'t
ngu+o+`i da~ man ta`n ddo^.c dde^'n the^' ma` lu+o+ng ta^m
bo.n ngu+o+`i CS va^~n ye^n o^?n ? - Kho^ng le~ ta^'t ca?
dde^`u co' lu+o+ng ta^m thui cho^.t? - Thu+a bo+?i vi` ho.
la` ti'n ddo^` thua^`n tha`nh cu?a CS quo^'c te^' . Ddu+o+.c
trang bi. nha^.p ta^m ba(`ng nhu+~ng "ddie^`u ra(n" trong
kinh ddie^?n tu+ ba?n lua^.n Karl Max . Ddie^`u ra(n a^'y
la` : "Ke^'t qua? bie^.n minh cho phu+o+ng tie^.n" ! Vi`
the^' bo.n ngu+o+`i a^'y tha ho^` che'm gie^'t, tha ho^`
khu?ng bo^', tha ho^` gie^'t ha.i , tha ho^` pha'o ki'ch
va`o da^n la`nh vo^ to^.i dde^? chi? ca^`n mong tha('ng
trong chie^'n tranh . Bo.n ngu+o+`i a^'y ca^`n gi` pha?i ddi
xu+ng to^.i nhu+ nhu+~ng ti'n ddo^` Thie^n Chu'a Gia'o .
Bo.n ngu+o+`i a^'y ddu+o+.c chu+o+'c he^'t ta^'t ca? dde^?
tha ho^` ba('n gie^'t ddo^`ng loa.i! Qua? la` thu+' kinh
ddie^?n ngoa.i la.i tha^m ddo^.c ddu+o+.c nha^.p ca?ng va`o
dde^? ta`n pha' da^n to^.c, the^' ma` ho. va^~n luo^n luo^n
che^ bai ngu+o+`i QG la` vo.ng ngoa.i !
Ba`i ho.c li.ch su+? tha?m sa't va` die^.t chu?ng Ma^.u
Tha^n bo+?i bo.n ngu+o`i CSVN kho^ng the^? que^n . Ddu+`ng
phi' pha.m lo`ng tin va`o bo.n ngu+o+`i CS. Chu'ng ta dda~
tin ho. qua' nhie^`u !
Xin ha~y ddo^'t 1 ne'n hu+o+ng cu`ng tha`nh ki'nh da^ng le^n
dde^? nho+' ca'c anh linh dda~ nga~ xuo^'ng trong tra^.n
Ma^.u Tha^n va` nga`y 30-4-75
Nguy. Nha^n
03-29-98
http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Campus/4973/index.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> Vietnam Insight (vins...@best.com)
> URL: http://www.vinsight.org/
>
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
El CHINO THE GREAT
This panegyric of the despised ARVN is too funny to be let go.
The author claimed that the ARVN soldiers who were more known as
chicken/dog stealers than for any martial virtues as the patriotic
saviors who were universally loved must be in an advance stage of
dementia.
The fact spoke for itself. Even their wives, girl friends, mothers and
sisters deserted them for the VC because they could not take this sense
of humour.