Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Steve Martin's on Mel's movie

2 views
Skip to first unread message

don freeman

unread,
Mar 2, 2004, 8:31:33 PM3/2/04
to
From the New Yorker, The Back Page by Steve Martin

STUDIO SCRIPT NOTE5 ON "THE PASSION"


Dear Mel, We love, love the script! The ending works great. You'll be
getting a call from us to start negotiations for the book rights.
—Love the Jesus character. So likable. He can't seem to catch a break!
We identify with him because of it. One thing: I think we need to
clearly state "the rules." Why doesn't he use his superpowers to save
himself? Our creative people suggest that you could simply cut away to
two spectators:
SPECTATOR ONE
Why doesn't he use his superpowers to save himself?
SPECTATOR TWO
He can only use his powers to help others, never himself.

—Does it matter which garden? Gethsemane is hard to say, and Eden is a
much more recognizable garden. Just thinking out loud.

—Our creative people suggest a clock visual fading in and out in certain
scenes, like the Last Supper bit: "Thursday, 7:43 P.M.," or "Good
Friday, 5:14 P.M."

—Love the repetition of "Is it I?" Could be very funny. On the eighth
inquiry, could Jesus just give a little look of exasperation into the
camera? Breaks frame, but could be a riot.

—Also, could he change water into wine in Last Supper scene? Would be a
great moment, and it's legit. History compression is a movie tradition
and could really brighten up the scene. Great trailer moment, too.

—Love the flaying.

—Could the rabbis be Hispanic? There's lots of hot Latino actors now,
could give us a little zing at the box office. Research says there's
some historical justification for it.
—Possible tide change: "Lethal Passion." Kinda works. The more I say it
out loud, the more I like it.

—Is there someplace where Jesus could be using an iBook? You know, now
that I say it, it sounds ridiculous. Strike that. But think about it.
Maybe we start a shot in Heaven with Jesus thoughtfully closing the top?
—Love the idea of Monica Bellucci as Mary Magdalene (yow!). Our creative
people suggest a name change to Heather. Could skew our audience a
little younger.

—Love Judas. Such a great villain. Our creative people suggest that he's
a little complicated. Couldn't he be one thing? Just bad? Gives the
movie much more of a motor. Also, thirty pieces of silver is not going
to get anyone excited. I think it'd be very simple to make him a "new
millionaire." Bring in the cash on a tray. Great dilemma that the
audience can identify with. —Minor spelling error: on page 18, in the
description of the bystanders, there should be a space between the words
"Jew" and "boy."

—Merchandising issue: it seems the Cross image Has been done to death
and is public domain—we can't own it. Could the Crucifixion scene
involve something else? A Toyota would be wrong, but maybe there's a
shape we can copyright, like a wagon wheel?

—I'm assuming "The dialogue is in Aramaic" is a typo for "American." If
not, call me on my cell, or I'm at home all weekend.

By the way, I'm sending a group of staffers on a cruise to the North
Pole, coincidentally around the time of your picture's release. Would
love to invite your dad!

See you at the movies!
Yours,
| Stan

Jperdue4

unread,
Mar 2, 2004, 10:23:57 PM3/2/04
to
>Message-id: <Vza1c.651098$JQ1.88902@pd7tw1no>

>
> From the New Yorker, The Back Page by Steve Martin
>
>STUDIO SCRIPT NOTE5 ON "THE PASSION"
>

Lol..Is that for real?..Do you have a link to it?
Jonp

don freeman

unread,
Mar 2, 2004, 10:36:50 PM3/2/04
to

> Lol..Is that for real?..Do you have a link to it?

I don't know if it's on the net.

A little birdy scanned it.

J Buck

unread,
Mar 2, 2004, 10:53:48 PM3/2/04
to
<Love the idea of Monica Bellucci as Mary Magdalene (yow!)>

Monica Bellucci is in this? Does she wear the white spike heels from
'Matrix 2'?

Delia

unread,
Mar 2, 2004, 11:39:43 PM3/2/04
to


"Jperdue4" <jper...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040302222357...@mb-m04.aol.com...

http://www.newyorker.com/shouts/content/

--
Delia

Delia

unread,
Mar 2, 2004, 11:45:12 PM3/2/04
to
oops. sorry. that's the wrong one. Can't find it online.

--
Delia
"Delia" <lhans...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jkd1c.19455$2T3....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...

Olompali4

unread,
Mar 3, 2004, 9:20:55 AM3/3/04
to
>Lol..Is that for real?..Do you have a link to it?
>Jonp

sigh..it's a parody written by Steve Martin for The New Yorker. And quite
clever.

don freeman

unread,
Mar 3, 2004, 6:15:44 PM3/3/04
to

> sigh..it's a parody written by Steve Martin for The New Yorker. And quite
> clever.
>

Shows how far I'm into humour. I thought, when Jperdue4 asked if it were
for real, I thought he was asking if it really was a Steve Martin
parody, or a parody of a Steve Martin parody.

It never occured to me someone thought it was really real.

tom .

unread,
Mar 3, 2004, 8:01:10 PM3/3/04
to

don freeman wrote:
>
>> sigh..it's a parody written by Steve Martin for The New Yorker. And quite
>> clever.
>>
>
> Shows how far I'm into humour.


donny, i have to break it to you -- but believing you have a sense of
humor and making jokes isn't the same thing as being funny or humorous.
so please, for the love of god, or the life force, whatever that
is, stop. just stop.

with that said, thanks for the steve martin bit. now that was funny.

.

0 new messages