#CINDY'S SLIP-UPS!!
Ted McMillan
that I am hateful because I reproved another terrorist by the name of
Ted Seeber who publicly told the world that a multitude of Christians
deserved to be exterminated by his pope because, according to him,
they didn't live the bible. After working on the premise that the
worst thing is to accuse somebody of anything (even if it is true) she
and Vatican Angelo have launched out to attack me and have done
everything they are condemning me for, but claiming now that
Christians are not perfect in order to forgive themselves for what
they have done and what they must do.
Cindy promised not to post to me anymore, but even on the Catholic
newsgroups, people just like her keep saying the same thing but cannot
afford to ignore my postings. Well let's take a look again at what
Cindy has done so that we can also notice that neither Vatican Cindy
nor Vatican Angelo have been able to present the examples against me
that I do present against them here. Vatican Cindy writes:
>Lamarr,
>
>Ted might also be suprized to find out that not as much as he thought
>passed my eyes. I have been, and am watching too.
I know that Cindy was watching and that she sees everything. That was
not my point. My point is that she pretends that she doesn't see my
point. I am condemned for exposing and reproving an ultra terrorist.
Men, women and children lost their lives in the worst of ways and
Seeber told us they deserved it because they didn't live the bible. I
therefore reproved the terrorist and told him I don't care if it were
Atheists that were completely exterminated by his Rome. That is not
right! I then brought the issue over why Seeber was offering
condolenses to the victims of September 11 since he condemned many
others who died worse because they didn't live the bible according to
his standards. From then on Cindy approached to willfully ignore what
Seeber did and to attack me for, as she claims, having a problem with
loving people. Clearly she is a Vatican infiltrant, for only they can
be that unscrupulous.
>None of us has behaved perfectly when dealing with Ted. :) He seems to
>bring out the worst in people. But as another friend of mine recently
>pointed out:
However Cindy, Angelo, Lamarr and all were the ones to approach
telling us that the Lord showed them I had a problem with love and
behavior. They label their willful lies as not being perfect. Cindy
even commented before that they slip at times, but at least they are
not bad people like I am. But the best time to slip so often as shown
below is when they come claiming that the Lord showed them that I have
a problem.
>"Christians are not perfect, they are just forgiven."
This counts for Ted Seeber also, according to Vatican Cindy, but it
doesn't count for poor me! You need to witness the kind of government
that is fast forcing it way upon you!
>I have been accused of lying. I will tell you now that the only
>things I feel guilty for, and feel I owe apologies for; is for two
>separate statements I made. One to Paul, where I told him I had wiped
>my feet of Ted, and then a short time later resumed posting to Ted.
>Another was to Larry, when he told me we should ignore Ted, unless he
>showed repentence, and I agreed. I believe these statements made me
>appear guilty, of what Ted has been accusing me of, and I feel bad
>about that. I'm sorry Paul. I'm sorry Larry. :)
>
>I changed my mind because of some bible verses I read.
>
>Pro 16:2 All the ways of a man [are] clean in his own eyes; but the
>LORD
>weigheth the spirits.
>
>1Ti 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times
>some
>shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and
>doctrines
>of devils;
Of course, Cindy is demonstrating what they taught her behind the
walls of the Vatican. Make a promise after enough time to be sure.
Now, like every other person attacking me on the newsgroups and who
presents a Vatican agenda, she must continue to post to me. She
therefore ignores every scripture that tells Christians to keep their
promises in order to f'ind others that do not even pertain to the
point!
On 11 Nov 2001 06:06:59 -0800, synt...@iei.net (Cindy) wrote:
>Ted McMillan <tmac...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message news:<3o7sutg0fa4iqb1t8...@4ax.com>...
>> OH SO YOU MEAN THE BIBLE CONTRADICTS ITSELF??
>
>>
>> And what is this Cindy about you calling me your sister?
>
>Typo? You.. are the brother.
>
> Are you the
>> "ass's" sister??
>
I said this because, after again proclaiming that she can no longer
attack anything through a false apology she has made below, Vatican
Cindy sent me an email telling me that I am an "ass." Again, although
even Osama Bin Laden is called many names, Ted Seeber, the man who
told us that whole groups of christians that were exterminated
throughout history deserved what they got because they did not "live
the bible" received not the slightest comment from Cindy. She has
then approached me to tell us all the Lord revealed to her that I have
a problem with love.
Cindy therefore now again speaks publicly to the person she has often
claimed that she loves. She claims I cannot accept love because I am
loveless despite her fellow terrorist of the Papacy. She writes:
>Apparently so. You are an extremely stubborn, and muleheaded man. LOL
>It must run in the family. Is this going to turn into one of those out
>of control discussions? I will just say adieu for now if it is.
Let's therefore again uneath the papal despot called Cindy who has
been trained in all the latest mind tactics of the Papacy for these
last days:
September 28, 2001
Cindy wrote:
>God and Satan are oposites. God, loves, he unites, he is truth, he is
>our creator, and our savior. He is Life. Satan, hates, divides,
>deceives, and tries to take Gods place, while he works to accuse us,
>and destroy us. He is Death.
Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came
not to send peace, but a sword.
35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her
mother in law.
36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
-------------------------------------------------------
I reply:
Lamarr Edwards posts one of his supremely insultive posts that passes
by the eyes of Cindy... BY ACCIDENT?? You are about to see the fruits
of the spirit Cindy is talking about that by her lack of response she
subscribes to:
From: Lamarr Edwards (shmo...@webtv.net)
Search Result 1
Subject: Re: THE AFTERMATH OF TERROR!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (33 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-16 21:45:48 PST
Ted M.- You are one wacko dullard aren't you? Of course the
government let this plot go forward and kill all these
people,so they could bug your bedroom! Look out the window right
now,did you see'um? They want ya Ted,they want to know everything
about you. The CIA,the Cosa Nostra Adventista,and the Popes personal
hit squad
watch you all the time Ted, they follow you everywhere,they have
machines to read your thoughts,the whole world is against you,your
mother was one of them,aaaarrghh!!!
Get a life or some medicine,dummy.
LE
--------------------------------------------------------
Cindy posts to Lamarr Edwards:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 20
Subject: Re: LAMARR EDWARDS REQUIRES SPECIFIC PROOF FROM HIS ENEMIES!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (7 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-18 17:14:38 PST
Lamarr,
You get to be called all kinds of names, I only get called the same
one, repeatedly.
I thought I was unique, but now you're a despot too. So much for that
theory.
Welcome to my world, :)
Cindy
What if,... there are despots everywhere? :)
--------------------------------------------------------
Lamarr Posts more insults against Cindy's false preaching about Christ
and the fruits of the Spirit. Will Cindy notice?
From: Lamarr Edwards (shmo...@webtv.net)
Search Result 1
Subject: Re: SEEBER'S HATRED OF LIBERTY!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (18 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-22 21:45:45 PST
Ted Seeber- Your pal sure shoots his mouth off about liberty. If he
is old enough to have been around in the viet nam era,I guarantee
you he was a "contientious objector",they love liberty,as long as you
have to pay the price for it. He couldn't find his own butt with both
hands,let alone have any
understanding of the law. He is an ass.LE
--------------------------------------------------------
Another supremely insultive post by Lamarr that Cindy will always
refuse to see:
From: Lamarr Edwards (shmo...@webtv.net)
Search Result 42
Subject: Re: SECURITY VS. PRIVACY??
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (35 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 16:45:30 PST
Teddy boy- If you are "the last word on Adventist truth",then
Adventism
has gone the way of Jim Jones,and David Koresh,it has been consumed by
insanity and evil,to become a theological dead end to be laughed at by
all
Christendom. Of course,you are not "the last word on Adventist
truth",you are just a
mentally ill fool who spreads your message of corrupted Christianity
to
other lost souls of insecurity,inferiority and stupidity,like an AIDS
carrier blithely liasing with anyone who will respond. Your father
satan must be so proud of you.LE
--------------------------------------------------------
Cindy adds to the insultive postings of Lamarr with her arrogance:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c20cba56.0109230715.5b6cd55b%40posting.google.com
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Subject: Re: ###SEEBER AGAIN MAKES EARTH-SHATTERING ADMISSIONS!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 08:15:12 PST
Ted
Have you ever seen the cartoon Pinky and the brain? LOL, I'm sorry,
sometimes little things amuse me.
Cindy
-------------------------------------------------------
<><>
Cindy here in defending the awesomely insensitive and bloodthirsty
words of Ted Seeber tells me that I have taken Seeber's words out of
context, but she didn't take mine out of context. She does everything
to oppose me:
Seeber told us we must give up our liberties. If there is any reason
to see why Cindy can attack me and not Seeber, take a look at this:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 10
Subject: Re: SECURITY VS. PRIVACY??
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (35 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 09:28:48 PST
.. You may read it above :) I would just like to add, my own thought.
I wonder how many people on
the planes involved in our recent tragedy, if they had been asked to
give up a little of their privacy, to save lives, would have refused.
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
First look at Cindy claiming that she never attacked me. She claimed
that me thinking they were attacks were naturally just in my head and
that she is not a despot even though she has been trained in
techniques to exalt her views above all others even though yet
claiming that everyone should have a right to disagree:
Now, here is Cindy's false and very revealing apology to me where she
confesses that she had malice in her heart and that she attacked me.
It states that she should not have used the words that she did even
though she later told us there was no problem with her words, her
words were only expressions of love. The problem, she claims was in
her heart:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 1
Subject: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-27 17:26:16 PST
Ted, When I wrote the previous post, I was angry. That does not excuse
my behavior. I knew when I wrote the things I did, that I shouldn't be
writing them, I ignored those feelings, and wrote what I did anyway.
Once I posted it, and it was too late to take back those words, it hit
me, how wrong I've been. I prayed before going to sleep, but it was
hard, to not continue trying to justify my behavior to God. You are
right, I talked about the fruits of the spirit, and then didn't show
them myself.
I woke up this morning, not feeling right, I was running late to
work, unusual for me,I usually wake up before my alarm goes off. Part
of a bible verse was in my head, I couldn't look it up, because I
didn't have time, I didn't take time to pray, because I thought I
didn't have time.
All day long, the same line kept running through my head, "
whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest...think on
these things." I couldn't remember the rest of the verse, or where it
came from, also unusual for me. When I finally did pray, while I was
working, suddenly another partial verse popped into my head, " avoid
strivings.." I kept trying to put both of these out of my head,
because it was like listening to a broken record. A thought came to me
in the midst of this struggle. Another reason for not judging others,
is because in your judgement of them, you are committing a wrong,and
by doing that, it becomes easier to do other wrongs. In judging you, I
started being guilty, of the same things I was accusing you of. I
don't feel very good about that. I felt better after I acknowledged
this.
It is better to focus on God's love. When you begin to focus on
hatred, even if it's someone elses, and you do it with the best of
intentions, you lose sight of what is important, and it happens so
gradually, you don't even realize it's happening till it's almost too
late.
I pray you understand what I am saying. Your sister in christ,
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
Cindy refuses to reprove Lamarr Edwards for his supremely insultive
and hateful posts AFTER HER FALSE APOLOGY. She tells us she can't
attack anymore because of her repentance:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 2
Subject: Re: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 17:53:15 PST
...
>
> Cindy:
>
> For the last time to get through your Christ-centered thick despot
> skull:
>
> The problem was not that you attacked, BUT THAT YOU ATTACKED ONE
> PERSON AND WAS ONE-SIDED. Ted:
I have said I was wrong for attacking you, attacking others will not
make that better. Perhaps you don't understand, that all the people
you group together, have had disagreements, we've all had words in the
past, and probably will continue to do so, however we do it in a
christian spirit, and respect each other. You have never claimed to
feel bad about attacking me, or anyone else. I won't repeat this
again, if you do not understand, then that is your choice. I forgive
you Ted, I have always forgiven you. If you can't treat me with love,
Please, leave me alone.
Cindy
-------------------------------------------------------
After refusing to reprove Lamarr for his hate-filled posts, Cindy
winds up complimenting and supporting Lamarr Edwards:
From: Cindy Ford (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 28
Subject: Re: My "attack" on Ted M.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (7 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 16:35:53 PST
Referring to his supremely insultive post against me, Lamarr writes:
"Lamarr Edwards" <shmo...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:12941-3BB...@storefull-291.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> IF any of you feel like commenting on my post to Ted,feel free to do
> so,I allowed him to bait me into a response in kind....
>
> Say to me whatever you choose,I assure you,it will be no problem.
>
> ....
Go with God Lamarr :) Your words show there is no problem.
Cindy
--------------------------------------------------------
CINDY AGAIN CONFIRMS THAT SHE HAS ATTACKED ME AND THAT SHE CAN NO
LONGER ATTACK ANYONE WHEN SHE WAS ASKED TO COMMENT ON LAMARR'S MOST
INSULTING POSTS AGAINST ME:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 27
Subject: Re: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 17:53:15 PST
...
>>
>> Cindy:
>>
>> For the last time to get through your Christ-centered thick despot
>> skull:
>>
>> The problem was not that you attacked, BUT THAT YOU ATTACKED ONE
>>PERSON AND WAS ONE-SIDED.
>Ted:
>I have said I was wrong for attacking you,
Remember when Cindy told us that she was never attacking me? She
asked me why I view her expressions of love as attacks and told
everybody that I was just imagining things. In this post she is
telling us that she was attacking me, and her posts are now just the
same as before her false apology?
The result of all this is that she has qualified herself to teach us
about love, the fruits of the Spirit, Christ, and all that Christ does
for a person. But she continues:
>attacking others will not
>make that better. Perhaps you don't understand, that all the people
>you group together, have had disagreements, we've all had words in the
>past, and probably will continue to do so, however we do it in a
>christian spirit, and respect each other. You have never claimed to
>feel bad about attacking me, or anyone else.
>*I WON'T REPEAT THIS AGAIN AGAIN*,
>if you do not understand, then that is your choice. I forgive
>you Ted, I have always forgiven you. If you can't treat me with love,
>Please, leave me alone.
>Cindy
----------------------------------------
ANOTHER ATTACK BY CINDY AFTER HER FALSE APOLOGY HERE!
She will hear accusative and insultive things from another poster
against me after her false apology telling us that she cannot even
reprove Lamarr for his supremely insultive posts because she has
repented, but she adds insults instead of corrects this other poster
using her false "love."
Look closely at her insults and compare it with her continuing false
words today:
From: Cindy Ford (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 4
Subject: Re: to Ted McMillan
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (30 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 16:20:40 PST
"EW..." <ewy...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:9p2qb8$g1hhq$5...@ID-36342.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "Lamarr Edwards" <shmo...@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:12941-3BB...@storefull-291.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> > Donna,Cindy,Larry,Ted S.,et al-
> >
> > All good tries at trying to be
> > logical,kind,Christian,reasonable,forgiving with Ted M., unforunately
> > nothing will work. There are others of us who over the years have tried
> > these approaches,nothing works to get through to him.
> >
>
> LE,
>
> Like Larry said (I think it was Larry), TM may just be yanking our chains
> for certain responses which he/she enjoys. Think about it. "He" could be a
> homely little 19 year old college sweetheart who can't get a date, but is
> otherwise a cuddly little fur-ball at heart. He/she just enjoys raising
> emotions because it's the only way it works for him/her. Not possible??
> Sure it is! :-))
>
> EW
>
>
LOL EW.
Anything is possible. It is possible, he is alive and well, and living
in
FL, over double that age, and has a group of followers, who all have
tunnel
vision. Regardless, he consistently shows up here, although his
webpage
denounces this NG as a hotbed of papal infiltration. Follows people
around,
and then claims the opposite. Most likely he shows up when interest in
his
webpages die down, to try to recruit new followers.
CU, Cindy
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Binaries.net = SPEED+RETENTION+COMPLETION =
http://www.binaries.net
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Binaries.net = SPEED+RETENTION+COMPLETION = http://www.binaries.net
Angelo Braz
Trying to take out attentions from you desperatly, so that your nature
is not seen? You're exposed, Terrorist Ted.
Angelo
Dolf Boek
More one line epithets, but no evidence of spiritual vitality?
- dolf
"Angelo Braz" <angel...@clix.pt> wrote in message
news:v1uhvtgmtjdkq0c2m...@4ax.com...
Angelo Braz
Just like this your one line epithet?
Angelo
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:06:10 GMT, "Dolf Boek" <dolf...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Dolf Boek
Just like this your one line epithet?
DOLF BOEK RESPONDS:
Dear Absent of Soul,
There you go again, speaking about referential integrity, without adequately
conveying which God it is that you actually worshipped in transcendence:
"In the city squares she veils herself, and in the gates of the village she
stations herself, and there is noone who can keep her from (her) incessant
fornicating. Her eyes scan hither and thither, and she raises her eyebrows
impudently, to spot a just man and overtake him, and a noble man, to trip
him up, the upright to turn (from) the path {cf: Gk Hodos}, the righteous
chosen ones [12. Judas {the praise of the Lord; confession} Iscariot {a man
of murder; a hireling/man of the building city} From Hebrew ish-qeriyoth man
of Kerioth {the cities; the callings}] from keeping the precept, to make
those with a steady [mind] ridiculous with recklessness, and those who walk
uprightly to alter the ordinance.
To make the simple rebel against God, to turn their steps off the paths of
justice, to bring presumptuousness into their heart, so that they do not
walk in the paths of uprightness. To sidetrack man into the ways of the
pit, and seduce the sons of men with smooth words." [DSS BRILL 1997:377]
http://www.users.bigpond.com/dolfboek/climax.html#SEVEN
- dolf
Ted McMillan
wrote:
To show that Angelo Braz is an unscrupulous infiltrating worker for
the Papacy, observe the words that he just wrote above and compare
them with all the posts he has made lately. Now observe these words
he wrote today:
-----------------------------------------
The matter is not who is worse. It's that you both acted wrongly.
But there's a difference. In this newsgroup, there are many different
opinions, but everyone has the right to tell his opinion, just as we
have the right to tell our opinion about it. But trashing a person
with repeated accusations, insults and disrespect for him, is
something to avoid.
In this case, you were no better than him.
Angelo
-------------------------------------------
He just condemned himself without a problem here! You tell me that
Christians can do that!