Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Internet worm writer stands trial (Internet)

91 views
Skip to first unread message

Cris Simpson

unread,
Jan 18, 1990, 9:29:37 AM1/18/90
to
da...@umbc2.umbc.edu (Damon Kelley; (RJE)) writes:
> [...]
> When I read the article that I got the above information from,
>I was a bit shocked that the jurors were deliberately picked by the
>U.S. Justice Department lawyers because didn't know *anything* about
>computers. Would the jurors understand enough of the computer talk
>thrown between defense and prosecutor to reach a truly informed
>verdict?
>
> My mother and I discussed the issue. I said that the trial
>would be unbalanced and handled badly because every little techie term
>would have to be explained over and over again to the jury, slowing
>down the trial process. Isn't a "jury of his peers" called for here?
> [...]
>Source: _The_Baltimore_Evening_Sun_, January 15, 1990. Section D, top
>of page 2: "'Illiterates' Judging Computer Genius." [..]

One of the most frightening experiences of my life was being
called to jury duty. I got to see what a 'jury of my peers' would
consist of. It gives one a lot of incentive not to get caught. (:-)

IANAL, but I see a problem in the future with technology-related
litigation. What good is the right to have your case tried before
a jury of idiots? For example, consider Intel v. NEC or Apple v.
MS & HP. It's hard enough explaining the concepts involved to a
reasonably intelligent judge, but a jury picked because they didn't
know anything?

I suppose that if a jury of people from Washington, DC can be found
who never heard of Ollie North, I suppose there's a jury for all of
us... (:-)

cris

*IANAL: I Am Not A Lawyer. (But my wife is.)

Ralph Treitz

unread,
Jan 18, 1990, 12:57:47 PM1/18/90
to
It was interesting to hear about the sequel of the Internet-worm-story.
For our newspapers didn't mention anything about the trial, I'd like to
hear in this newsgroup, what's going on, and what will happen to Mr. Morris.
Thanks.

+----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
! Ralph Treitz ! Phone: +49 6227 - 34 - 1641 !
! S.A.P. AG ! Fax: +49 6227 - 34 - 1282 !
! SAA-C ! Telex: 466 004 sap d !
! Max-Planck-Str. 8 ! !
! D-6909 Walldorf/Baden ! E-Mail: r...@sapwdf.uucp !
! West-Germany ( F.R.G. ) ! ...uunet!unido!sapwdf!rt !
+----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+

Robert Rubinoff

unread,
Jan 18, 1990, 5:34:50 PM1/18/90
to
biar!tre...@uunet.uu.net (Robert J Woodhead) writes:
> [...] In my circle of admittedly bright and educated friends, not
>a single one has, to my knowledge, ever been accepted for jury duty.

Well, I've never met RJW, so I don't qualify as a friend of his, but
I'm a PhD student in Computer Science at Penn, so I'm definitely
educated and presumably bright as well (at least I like to thing so).
I was just selected to serve on a jury even though I mentioned during
the selection process that I was a PhD student. So I guess it's not
impossible.

Robert

0 new messages