#SUPER-TERRORIST FOUND ON THE NEWSGROUPS!!
Ted McMillan
of Ted Seeber. This man is a Dark Ages Catholic, meaning that his
thoughts are at least just the same as the Inquisitors of history.
Speaking about the September 11th terrorist attacks we proceed:
When told how long this terrorist incident took to plan and implement
compared to others that were planned quicker and yet caught, Seeber
said: ?There have been plenty of successfull terrorist attacks
against US interests where the terrorists stayed legal until the
attack.?
We find this difficult to believe since we know that America had been
considered a haven against terrorism and how this was surely mentioned
by all our news media as they were describing the impact of this
unprecedented act of terrorism.
Seeber tells us that:
The current Constitutional principles of liberty are incredibly
outdated and stupid. He said the principle is as old as the 1500s
with Martin Luther. When did his principles for no liberty or privacy
originate? When Christians reveal the Vatican hatred of religious
liberty of conscience and expose her continual conspiracy through
infiltration of our nation and the nations of the world, despot
Vatican Catholics like Seeber tell the world that we hate the Catholic
people. How long was this practice used? Since he told us that our
principles of liberty are outdated, how outdated is the constant
reflex habit that exposing people who slowly tortured Christians to
death makes one hateful of Catholics and more a criminal than the
people who committed the atrocities themselves? How outdated it is?
Seeber said that the terrorist incident provided a benefit to us in
that, ?we found out that privacy is not a luxury we can afford just
yet.? Notice that he said ?we? volunteering all opinions for us and
not allowing us to disagree. He includes himself among us as if he is
one of us even though he hates liberty for everything else except him
and his church. He doesn?t think like us nor agree with us, but he
includes himself in our communion. He gets upset when we say he is a
despot.
AFTER he already told us a year before on the newsgroups that ?liberty
is useless and only causes schism.? We therefore asked again and
again the question we have for our new American government:
?If the Citizens of America agree to give up their liberties in order
to take out terrorism, what will happen after terrorism is conquered?
Will we get our liberties back? Seeber has indeed answered that
question for us.
Soon Seeber began to lie to us telling us that what he said about
liberty being useless is just and only his opinion and that I should
not get upset about it or believe it. The problem is that there is
documentation showing that his church does believe that liberty is
useless and only causes schism.
Seeber accuses us of aiding and supporting the terrorists because we
believe that liberty and privacy is more important than stopping Bin
Laden. He despots us to believe that Bin Laden will only be caught if
privacy is eliminated.
Seeber tells all that Osama Bin Laden is my Idol because I determined
that the American citizens must retain their liberties.
In Seeber telling us that Privacy is outdated. He tells us that we
should provide all our private information to the government. Our
emails should not be private. Even our apartments that we rent, since
we did not build them, we should allow our landlords the rights to go
in and out as they please and to do what they want. Privacy and
liberty are not inseparable. Those who contend for privacy are
criminals.
Seeber claims that I support the terrorists because I oppose the
citizens giving up their privacy and liberties. He says that I
support those who would destroy liberty. When I replied that I don?t
support Seeber (who would destroy liberty), he asked if I support the
American citizens living their lives as if nothing had happened. Well
no I don?t. I want the citizens to remember this terrorist attack as
I want them to remember the worst terrorist attacks during the Dark
Ages. But as Seeber told everyone that I support terrorism because I
support the citizens living as if nothing has happened, you can see
that he also condemned President Bush for saying that America should
continue living on their lives and that we will not allow terrorists
to limit the freedoms of Americans.
Others have falsely claimed that Ted Seeber doesn't represent Catholic
thought, but this is not the fact. Although Ted Seeber already has
argued against liberty for all non-Catholics, he has shown just as
Rome has that he believes in a different type of liberty. Check for
example this Catholic statement of her position on this matter:
"The church does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty IN THE PROTESTANT SENSE OF LIBERTY." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.
Ted Seeber, in another occasion talks about "fake liberty" after
telling us that liberty itself is useless and "only causes schism." He
is therefore showing that he supports a different kind of liberty even
though he has before condemned the concept entirely.
Ted Seeber charges Ted McMillan with aiding terrorists through his
support of the rights of the citizens of America to keep their
liberties. He says that by Ted McMillan?s determination along this
line, he provides, ?Aid and comfort to the enemy, is what you said and
did.? But he gets upset if people say he?s a despot.
Ted McMillan asked if we are entering a government now when those who
tell us that ?liberty is useless and only causes schism? are freedom
lovers and those who are apalled by such words are terrorists? Seeber
replies, ?Yep. Been that way for 40-odd years now.? Why then is he
calling for change to that setting if he now tells us it is and has
already been like that?
After Ted McMillan said that those who believe ?liberty is useless and
only causes schism? are the ones who believe in depopulation, Seeber
said, ?Really? You don't believe in depopulation? Then what are all
those guns for?? He is against the rights to bear arms which was
instituted as a last resort to the Citizens of America in case they
find themselves suddenly confronting a tyrannical United States
government through infiltration, having people who think like Seeber
all throughout it as it is today. But Seeber well knows that the US
military and the UN has lots of guns and far more devices of
destruction INCLUDING STICKY STRIPS. These are spread along highways
and arteries where people can enter or leave populated areas. They
get stuck there and can?t move. The criteria Seeber gave was that if
you own guns or support the ownership of it, you believe in
depopulation. But Seeber gets upset when we say he is a despot. Why
is the government planning a depopulation of the citizenry?
Seeber says:
I know you have a Jihad against America because you support an
outdated and incredibly stupid interpretation of the Constitution,
[the ?interpretation that always was] and because you support the
taking up of arms against your own government even in times of war.
Ted McMillan:
Ted Seeber knows the following very well, but he is working to
deliberately deceive the readers here. The framers of the
Constitution allowed for the citizens of America to be armed in case,
through infiltration, the American Government turns into a tyrannical
government. I assure all of you that the framers of the Constitution
do not have a Jihad against America. The guns are for the citizens to
protect themselves against despots like Seeber who would at times
claim themselves that they would infiltrate the government and work to
change it till it hates and outlaws liberty. Seeber even admitted
this very thing concerning himself.
Ted McMillan:
> Yes, I am on the side of those who love liberty. Where have I said
> whose side I was or was not on?
Ted Seeber:
In fighting for privacy rights (which aren't in the
constitution-ANYWHERE) against neccessary rules needed to fight
against the Terrorists, you've chosen the wrong side.
Ted McMillan?s comment:
Take note folks that he told us we shouldn?t have rights to privacy
?just yet? when he was in deceive mode. He now again shows us we were
to NEVER have it, for he claims it is nowhere in the Constitution.
He tells us privacy rights aren?t in the constitution, yet he is just
one of a vast army working to change the Constitution so that it can
take away the privacy rights. Where else have we seen thinking like
Seeber?s? Have any of you studied the Communists? Have any of you
studied the Nazis? If Seeber?s principles are so great, please show
us how these regimes were great throughout history. Where is the
benefit of them compared to America? Let us see if Vatican
Inquisitors, Communists, Facists, Nazis or Seeber can learn anything
even in lessons over the span of thousands of years! How come you
can?t see that the sources which told us there is an indelible
connection between Communism, Fascism, Nazism and every other horrible
regime to the Vatican is fact?? ?Well Seeber doesn?t speak for the
Catholic Church? the ?Ends Justifies the Means? people would say.
Well then why not then get upset at Seeber? Instead all emotion is
only on Ted McMillan. That is VERY revealing!
Seeber says that he destroys communities and builds them:
He says that he works against the government in order to reform it
from the inside in ?acceptable confines?, but though Ted McMillan is
in agreement with the present makeup of government, he is in a Jihad
against it. Anyone who repeats this fact about Seeber as Jack Chick
and others tell us, will be charged with being ?Anti-Catholic? and
with hating Catholics. How come Seeber is not being charged here?
All this shows that ROME HAS NOT CHANGED! Despot Catholics like
Seeber would never think of providing such unlimited power to the free
American government throughout its history. Why are they so eager and
determined that that be done now? That is because most of those in
government are secretly loyal to the Pope and would break any American
or Constitutional principle in a heartbeat at his command irregardless
of any oath that they have made. They could not do this so readily
historically because there were many true Americans who also held
posts side them and who would either stop them or report what they
were doing. As prophecy is about to be fulfilled, NOW THAT POPULATION
OF TRUE AMERICANS IS ALMOST NON-EXISTENT. They have retired, have
been dismissed, have been killed, or otherwise just are not there
anymore. Some have resigned in protest of the new outlaw movements.
I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:
Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>
Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.
Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.
Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!
Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?
Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!
I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!
--------------------
For making these statements, I have been constantly attacked by
Vatican Cindy Ford, Angelo Braz and Paul Tooley Jr. who all falsely
claim to be Adventists. Their discussion specifically and
intentionally leaves out their fellow soldier of the Pope, Ted Seeber,
and they have even demanded that I not refer to Ted Seeber in any
discussion despite his very revealing comment involving the blood of
the Saints. These all claim to be Adventists. I have asked Vatican
Cindy a simple question. She moves heaven and earth to evade it but
later claims that she has answered it. Below is the question and
check the threads in order to see how she has answered it. She has
moved heaven and earth to evade and avoid it and then finally lied by
telling us that she has answered it. The statement of Ted Seeber not
only condemned the religion Cindy Ford falsely claims to be a part of,
but because of her claims, his statements also condemns her life. The
same is true for Vatican Angelo Braz. They have played the Jesuit and
done everything possible to avoid the very plain and clear question
while claiming that they have answered it.
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
Tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com