Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NIZKOR Director Ken McVay in Bed With Communists and His Animosity Against Anti-Communists Documented aka Re: SCOTT BRADBURY IS AN IDIOT R_0115

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Tavish

unread,
Jan 15, 2003, 10:57:20 AM1/15/03
to
The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=7soT9.302%24q%253.15...@news.nnrp.ca&lr=&hl=en
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:27:47 GMT, <7soT9.302$q%3.158...@news.nnrp.ca>
kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay) wrote:

>Subject: Re: SCOTT BRADBURY IS AN IDIOT

Name call and personal attack is all you can reply with when you can't refute my
self evident truths. Everyone will compare what you say to what I post and those
who are objective will see who has their facts and documentation in order and
who can properly defend their position and who can't defend their position thus
having to rely on smear and personal attacks.

>Reply-To: kmc...@nizkor.org
>Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/

The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461

>X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
>From: kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay)
>Lines: 36
>Message-ID: <7soT9.302$q%3.158...@news.nnrp.ca>
>Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:27:47 GMT
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.126.72.25
>X-Trace: news.nnrp.ca 1042158467 216.126.72.25
>(Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:27:47 EST)
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:27:47 EST
>
>>Seeing how you hate Nazis for all the deaths they caused in the 20th
>>Century; it would only be logical you would be against a person who
>>embraces an ideology which has killed and is killing even more people.
:
>Like, er, Democracy, for example?

Communism, which you are very soft on, is NOT Democracy. One prime example out
of countless examples is the Demonstration for Democracy students had at
Tienanmen Square in China complete with a Statue of Liberty replica in which the
communist troops ran them over with tanks. Hardly democracy. You know how many
concentration camps the Nazis had but do you want to contemplate how many
concentration camps the Chinese Communists have for political prisoners in which
they are used as slave labor? Do you want to contemplate how many political
prisoners are executed a month and their internal organs harvested and sold on
the open market or do you want to contemplate how many forced abortions occur a
month in Communist China which you defend in this post I am now replying to?

>>You don't sense a slight bit of hypocrisy on your part? Communism still
>>has over a billion people enslaved today and Nazism does not exist as
>>a political entity.
:
>That's funny.... I've met a large number of students from Mainland
>China who don't feel the least bit "enslaved."

Those students are the offspring of the ruling elite and they are not the common
Chinese citizens.

>Do you suppose they know something you don't?

They know they are learning "our ways" so they can let their elitist parents
know about us so it could be used against us down the road as other people
hostile to North America have done and are still doing.

>They are, strangely enough, all from wealthy Chinese families...
>wealthy Capitalist families, from all over China.

That is a real hoot! The "wealthy Capitalist families, from all over China" are
the ruling elites NOT the common citizens! Of course in every communist
"dictatorship of the proletariat" the rulers or leaders have wealth, cars,
decent houses etc BUT the subservients don't! To say capitalism actually exists
in a communist country shows how divorced from reality you are. I now will quote
your political idealogue Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel along with people he
links to and who link to his web site from this archive:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e2357ab_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Communist Paul Kneisel Advocates a Revolution Against Capital and State
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:20:02 GMT

I will show the quote and credit whose words they are from the above archive and
I hardly think they, as communists, embrace capitalism!

"...It is our strategy that participation and intervention in these struggles,
from an anarchist-communist viewpoint... Slowly building a base for a truly mass
revolutionary anarchist movement capable of defeating not only fascist
organizations but also the combined forces of capital and the state...
--Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel

Fascism, the most evil child of capitalism, threatens all working class people
and all progressive organizations... To see how we can fight fascism, please
read the articles on the following web and FTP sites:
http://www.anti-fascism.org ftp://ftp.nyct.net/pub/users/tallpaul/publish/misc/
--Communist Party USA linking to Peter Outerbridge's aka Paul Kneisel's
web site ANTI-FASCISM.ORG

"Capitalism breeds racism and fascism the way a fly breeds maggots. The struggle
against fascism, and its organized racist core, is at the same time a
revolutionary struggle against capitalism itself.."
--David Lethbridge who links to ANTI-FASCISM.ORG and ANTI-FASCISM.ORG
links to him

"cockroach-capitalism"
--Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel

Hardly looks like communists embrace capitalism for the masses though they
would want the wealth their subordinates make possible for elitists to have
under a communist dictatorship.

>They would look at you as if you were a fool. Come to think of it,
>that makes perfect sense - you ARE a fool.

Just like someone who beds down with communist ideology to mock and ridicule an
anti-communist. You and your funding arm, B'nai Brith are on record for showing
hostility toward anti-communists as these archives show:

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/american/christian-identity/religion-white-racists.html
Christian Identity: A Religion for White Racists
"...Christians sometimes connect with this movement because of Identity's
espousal of issues such as right-to-life and anti-Communism. Because of this
vulnerability it is important for Christians to know and understand Identity's
false and racist teachings.... Another speaker used by most groups is Lt. Col.
Jack Mohr, whose specialty is anti-Communism." <END>

What is wrong with right-to-life or being "Pro-Life" and being an
anti-communist? You do NOT have to follow Christian Identity
(which I am not a follower of) to have those beliefs. What is wrong
with being an anti-communist Ken? Are you therefore pro-communist?

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/canadian/sirc/heritage-front/hf-i-overview.html
The Heritage Front Affair
Report to the Solicitor General of Canada
Security Intelligence Review Committee
December 9, 1994

"...the Edmund Burke Society in 1967. This Toronto-based organization,
described as "fringe right" by Stanley Barrett, covered the gamut of
right-wing issues, although anti-communism started out as the main focus
of its attack." <END>

http://www1.us.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/d/darville.helen/press/press-summary
Shofar FTP Archive File: people/d/darville.helen/press/press-summary
Message-ID: <20E5F...@edus2.educ.monash.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 21:12:14 CDT
Reply-To: History of Antisemitism List
Sender: History of Antisemitism List
From: Paul Gardner R313 x52854
Subject: The Demidenko/Darville affair

B'nai B'rith District 21 (Australia and New Zealand)
B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation Commission
Research Division

"Demidenko's mind-set, inherited one imagines from her
upbringing, is the result of anti-Communism..." <END>

The person mentioned is being raked over the coals by
B'nai Brith and its attack dog Nizkor!

Can anyone show any archive where B'nai Brith or Nizkor has
ever condemned communism out right? Can anyone show any archives
where B'nai Brith or its attack dog Nizkor has ever shown any
leaning toward anti-communism?

Here is a Nizkor archive which compares a conservative to fascism:

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/buchanan-pat/berlet-01.html
Buchanan & Fascism: A Serious Look
"The Roots of the Culture War
Spanning the breadth of the antidemocratic hard right is the banner of the
Culture War. The idea of the Culture War was promoted by strategist Paul
Weyrich of the Free Congress Foundation. In 1987, Weyrich commissioned a
study, Cultural Conservatism: Toward a New National Agenda, which argued
that cultural issues provided antiliberalism with a more unifying concept
than economic conservatism. Cultural Conservatism: Theory and Practice
followed in 1991... The Christian Coalition could conceivably evolve into
a more mainstream conservative political movement, or--especially if the
economy deteriorates--it could build a mass base for fascism similar to
the clerical fascist movements of mid-century Europe. For decades
anti-communism was the glue that bound together the various tendencies on
the right. Ironically, the collapse of communism in Europe allowed the US
political right to shift its primary focus from an extreme and hyperbolic
anti-communism... dominate the right wing of the Republican Party, and
included Patrick Buchanan, Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum, Pat Robertson's
Christian Coalition, the Rockford Institute, David Noebel's Summit
Ministries, and Paul Weyrich's Free Congress Foundation and Institute for
Cultural Conservatism. Of more historical importance are the John Birch
Society, the Christian Anti-Communism Crusade..." <END>

Doesn't it seem like Nizkor director Ken McVay's favorite color would be RED?
Why is "anti-communism" shown in a negative light at his B'nai Brith funded
web site?

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/b/bellant.russ/bellant.conclu
Shofar FTP Archive File: people/b/bellant.russ/bellant.conclu
"The record to date leads to the conclusion that the
Republican National Committee and the network around the American
Security Council and World Anti-Communist League may consider it
forgivable to have been a fascist collaborator so long as one is
today an active anti-communist pursuing the maintenance of the
Cold War in foreign policy and extremist right-wing politics at
home." <END>

Ken McVay definitely does not like anti-communists!

http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/orgs/canadian/sirc/heritage-front/HF-VII-Reform-Party
Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/canadian/sirc/heritage-front/HF-VII-Reform-Party
"...Paul Fromm and Ron Gostick who were publicly perceived to be associated
with extremist views. Another letter from the Party also said, apparently,
that Fromm was working with Gamble in the World Anti-Communist League
during the mid-1980s. Gamble was the North American Chairman of the World
Anti-Communist League and was the subject of an article in "This" Magazine.
He said that Don Blenkarn and others in the Conservative Party were also
mentioned as supporters of the League." <END>

Is McVay trying to link "extremist views" to being an anti-communist and a
conservative? You all decide.

Here are archives where Nizkor's Ken McVay and his master B'nai Brith
condemn anti-communists:

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/canadian/bc/university-of-victoria/hatred-in-canada/B-Winn.html
Combatting Hatred in Canada
"... It is difficult to record and determine the extent of hate-motivated
activities because they are not systematically collected and reported on.
Organizations such as the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
actively seek out this information... Most acts of right-wing violence were
acts committed by individuals unaffiliated or not claiming membership with
a particular group, or by groups not wishing to be publicly identified by
their actions. The bulk of actions for which a culprit could be found have
been executed in recent years by... anti-communist nationalists..."

Anti-communism is associated with hate.

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/orgs/canadian/canada/justice/hate-motivated-violence/hmv-002-00
Shofar FTP Archive File
"In researching the issue of hate-motivated criminal conduct,
this study examined existing criminal law practice in Canada
and ...publications by interested private organizations (e.g., the
League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada... Most acts of right-wing
violence were acts committed by individuals unaffiliated or not claiming
membership with a particular group, ...while the remainder are equally
divided between neo-fascist groups, such as the Western Guard, and
anti-communist nationalists.."

Seems anti-communism is hateful in some people's eyes and they ignore the
truth communism has murdered, enslaved, and tortured far more people than
the Nazis or anyone else! If Nizkor ET AL condemns Nazis then why are they
protective of communists?

http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/decisions/docs/league-e.htm
T.D. 15/92
Decision rendered December 16, 1992

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6 (as amended)

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL


BETWEEN:
LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
B'NAI BRITH CANADA (MIDWEST REGION)

[...]

B. THE COMPLAINTS

These complaints are brought by one individual and three organizations
under subsection 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. The complainants
are ... The League for Human Rights B'Nai Brith Canada
(Midwest Region)...

Subsection 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6
(CHRA) provides:

"It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of
persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to
cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by
means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within
the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is
likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by
reason of the fact that the person or those persons are
identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of
discrimination."

[...]

(1) Themes Which Promote Hatred:
(g) Anti-Communist Ideology

<END>

Thus a Canadian Court equated anti-communism to promotion of hatred and who
brought on the suit? ANSWER: LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS B'NAI BRITH CANADA (The
same people who launder exempt donations for Ken McVay's NIZKOR.ORG!!)

Proof LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS B'NAI BRITH is McVay's funding arm:

http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html

The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation
with the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada....
LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS B'NAI BRITH If you prefer that all of your donation
be invested for Nizkor's future needs, please earmark your cheque or draft
with the notation 'For The Nizkor Endowment Fund Only. (All bequests
should be to the 'Nizkor Endowment Fund, Care of The League for Human
Rights of B'nai Brith Canada'.).... <END>

There you have B'nai Brith having a court rule: "Themes Which Promote
Hatred: Anti-Communist Ideology" yet they champion themselves as the
preservers of human rights and the communists are the very worse violators!
Does hypocrisy come to mind?

You won't see the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada or its servant
Ken McVay and his NIZKOR ever complaining about the human rights abuses in
communist countries; rather they gloss over them as this very post you are
reading now proves which gives much credence to these two thought evoking
observations made by another anti-communist:

"If communism and fascism both lead to the same end, ie. totalitarianism, Why is
it that anyone who challenges and exposes international fascism is "good", and
anyone who challenges and exposes international communism is "bad"?"
http://www.niagara.com/~freedom/anticom/comweb.htm
"...Beware of any organization that champions equality but only denounces
fascism. Communism has enslaved far more people than fascism. Any organization
that condemns fascist atrocities while denying or ignoring communist atrocities
is most certainly a communist organization. Remember also that "equality" to a
communist means the equality of slavery."
http://www.niagara.com/~freedom/anticom/first.htm

Here is a well known observation by Jeff Jacoby of the Boston Globe which has
seen wide distribution:

http://www.physics.ncat.edu/~michael/vses/eth4000/victim.html
TO THE VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM, LEST WE FORGET
By Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
December 7, 1995

In 1993, President Clinton signed Public Law 103-199, authorizing a memorial
in Washington to those who died in the ``unprecedented imperial Communist
holocaust'' that began in 1917. It is a memorial long overdue. And it is
well-suited to Washington, the capital of the Free World and the headquarters
of what President Kennedy called the ``long twilight struggle'' against the
totalitarians of the Left. When completed, the Victims of Communism Memorial
will include a museum documenting the crimes committed by the disciples of
Marx and Lenin; original artifacts from the bitter night of Communist
brutality (a piece of the Berlin Wall, a cell from the ``Hanoi Hilton'');
and a database preserving the names of those wiped out in history's greatest
slaughter.

Or at least as many of those names as can be identified. It is impossible
that we shall ever know them all. Every one of the hundreds of thousands of
Cossacks butchered on Lenin's orders in 1919? Every Miskito Indian killed in
Nicaragua under the Sandinistas? Every Chinese peasant, all 2 million-plus
of them, obliterated during Mao Zedong's ``land reform'' in the early 1950s?
Impossible.

For pure murderous evil, there has never been a force to compare with
Communism. The Nazis didn't come close. The Holocaust was uniquely malignant
- never before or since did one people construct a vast industry of death
for the sole purpose of rounding up and destroying every single member of
another people. But the Nazis exterminated 11 million innocents; the
Communist death toll surpasses 100 million. Nazi power lasted from 1933 to
1945. The Communist nightmare began in November 1917, and continues to this
day.

Savagery has always been a hallmark of Communism. It is an ideology that
requires the destruction of human beings. ``We have never rejected terror in
principle,'' wrote Lenin in 1901, ``nor can we do so.''

Half a century later, even as he denounced the extremes to which his
predecessors went, Nikita Khrushchev vowed that the terror so esteemed by Lenin
would go on. ``The questioning of Stalin's terror,'' he cautioned the Twentieth
Party Congress in 1956, ``may lead to the questioning of terror in general. But
Bolshevism believes in the use of terror.'' Not long afterward, Khrushchev
sent 3,000 Soviet tanks to crush the Hungarian freedom fighters.

Communism equals murder. Everywhere. Always.

In Ukraine, for example, where 7 million people were starved to death on the
Kremlin's orders. ``If you go now to the Ukraine or the North Caucuses,''
wrote British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge in 1933, ``exceedingly beautiful
countries and formerly amongst the most fertile in the world, you will find
them like a desert; . . . no livestock or horses; villages deserted; peasants
famished, often their bodies swollen, unutterably wretched.'' Farmers who
took grain or vegetables from their own land were shot. Dead bodies littered
the streets of Kharkov, the capital. ``It was,'' an eyewitness later recalled,
``as if the Black Death had passed through.''

Communism equaled murder in Ethiopia, where Mengistu Haile Mariam became
dictator in 1977 and embarked on what he called his ``Red Terror.'' Tens of
thousands were massacred, including the graduating seniors of almost every
high school in Addis Ababa.

Communism equaled murder in North Vietnam as far back as 1945, when Ho Chi
Minh resolved to annihilate his Nationalist rivals. ``It was appalling,''
recorded the historian Lucien Bodard. ``Thousands, maybe tens of thousands
of men had been liquidated . . .. The intention was that horror and dread
should extinguish the last trace of respect for them among the masses: Their
execution had to be both shameful and terrifying. That was the reason for
the mass executions of hundreds at once, the fields of prisoners buried
alive, the harrows dragged over men buried up to the neck.''

Communism equaled murder in Tibet, where Mao's campaign to extirpate
Buddhist culture turned 1.2 million Tibetans into corpses. It equaled murder
in gentle Cambodia, where the bloodlust of the Khmer Rouge vaporized one-
third of the nation in less than four years. It equaled murder in Cuba, in
East Germany, in Afghanistan. From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the
Adriatic - murder. In the Gulag and the laogai - murder. At Tienanmen Square
- murder. In the Korean War and the Vietnam War, in the forest of Katyn and
the dungeons of the Lubyanka - murder.

One hundred million victims of Communism. And those are only the victims who
were slain. It doesn't include those who were maimed or driven mad. Those
whose lives went dark when a loved one was butchered. Those who spun out
their years in potato queues, in vodka stupors, in daily fear. It doesn't
include those who wasted 30 years as slaves in Siberia. The boat people who
flung themselves into the South China Sea. The stifled poets, the gagged
priests, the tormented refuseniks, the exiled democrats.

Rarely do we think of them, or of the hundred million. We forget how
pathologically evil Communism has been, or why we poured so much blood and
treasure into fighting the Cold War. It is to correct that amnesia that the
Victims of Communism Memorial will be built.

<END>

The above text is also mirrored at these sites:
http://www.gulag.hu/jacoby.htm
http://www.sid-ss.net/ref/vocmf.htm
http://www.globalspin.org/million_dead_russia.html

Here is the death count comparing communism to other idealogies (communism is by
far the most murderous yet Ken McVay and his B'nai Brith masters ignore it!)
from a university:

http://econ161.berkeley.edu/TCEH/Slouch_power4.html
-IV. Genocide-

J. Bradford DeLong
University of California at Berkeley and NBER
January 1997

Civilians Killed by Governments in the Twentieth Century: Top Twenty Regimes

Soviet Union (Communists) 61,900,000
1917-1990
China (Communists) 35,200,000
1949-present
Germany (Nazi Third Reich) 20,900,000
1933-1945
China (Kuomintang) 10,400,000
1928-1949
Japan (Imperial-Fascist) 6,000,000
1936-1945
China (Communist Guerrillas) 3,500,000
1923-1948
Cambodia (Communists) 2,000,000
1975-1979
Turkey ("Young Turks") 1,900,000
1909-1917
Vietnam (Communists) 1,700,000
1945-present
North Korea (Communists) 1,700,000
1948-present
Poland (Communists) 1,600,000
1945-1948
Pakistan (Yahya Khan) 1,500,000
1971
Mexico (Porfiriato) 1,400,000
1900-1920
Yugoslavia (Communists) 1,100,000
1944-1990
Russia (Czarist) 1,100,000
1900-1917
Turkey (Mustafa Kemal "Ataturk") 900,000
1918-1923
United Kingdom (Constitutional) 800,000
1900-present
Portugal (Fascist) 700,000
1926-1975
Croatia (Fascists) 700,000
1941-1945
Indonesia (Suharto) 600,000
1965-present

<END>

>Did you know that Communism was perfectly legal in Canada,

It only figures seeing how it is common knowledge Canada is a socialist
government and anyone researching the matter knows that socialism is just a
transitory stage to a communist state as these documents prove:

www.marxmail.org/faq/socialism_and_communism.htm
"Socialism and communism are alike in that both are systems of production for
use based on public ownership of the means of production and centralized
planning. Socialism grows directly out of capitalism; it is the first form of
the new society. Communism is a further development or "higher stage" of
socialism... Socialism is the first step in the process of developing the
productive forces to achieve abundance and changing the mental and spiritual
outlook of the people. It is the necessary transition stage from capitalism to
communism..." <END>

www.workerspower.com/wpglobal/transitiontocommunism.html
Workers Power Global | Marxism for Beginners

Transition to communism
Karl Marx was not the first to condemn capitalism for the poverty and
inequality that it creates, neither was he the first to fight for a society in
which poverty and inequality would be eradicated. But he was the first to
realise that capitalism itself would create the forces capable of overthrowing
it...
Socialism, understood as a society in which the economy was socially
owned and output was shared equally, would not be created, fully developed,
separate from existing capitalist society. Instead, in historic terms, there
would be a period during which capitalist society would be transformed into
socialist society, a "transitional" period...
Marx's political strategy, therefore, had to begin from this
understanding of society; the means of production for a better society already
existed, the working class needed that better society but the capitalists,
protected by the state, were determined to prevent any change. His first attempt
to develop a way of overthrowing this minority was presented in the Communist
Manifesto of 1848.
In the Manifesto, Marx not only delivered a devastating attack on
capitalism but set out the measures that a working class government, brought to
power by a democratic revolution, would need to take to begin the transition to
socialism.
These included the abolition of private ownership of land, a progressive
tax to drain away the wealth of the capitalists, the centralisation of credit in
a national bank, state ownership of transport and communications, planned
extension of production to meet need and free state education for all
children...
Marx, therefore, further refined the concept of a "transition society"
and introduced the idea that the development of communist society would take
place in two phases. In the first stage, "socialism" as he called it, the
commune state was still necessary both to defeat all attempts at
counter-revolution and to reconstruct the international economic system on an
egalitarian and planned basis.
This, Marx called, the "dictatorship of the proletariat". Dictatorship
is frequently counterposed to democracy. Yet for Marx the concept of
dictatorship was necessary and justified. Indeed, it was a very democratic
dictatorship...
How long this transition would take was not predictable but Marx pointed
out that the more successful the commune was the less necessary it would become.
Once the bourgeoisie had been eliminated as a class, for example, there would be
no need for military organisation or defence expenditure.
In the longer term, the transition would be completed when society no
longer needed a political force, a state of any sort, in order to organise
production and distribution.
Administration would still be necessary but in an egalitarian society
this would not involve the subordination of one part of the population by
another, it would no longer be "political". This would be communist society.
<END>

>and that folks representing the CP of Canada run for Parliament every time an
>election rolls around?
>
>Most folks just laugh at 'em, and we never, ever, look under our beds
>or lock up our daughters.

See you don't take issue with the Communist Party running for office yet your
government and B'nai Brith ET AL are afraid of individuals such as David Irving
or Ernst Zundel and they seek to imprison them or bannish them from Canadian
soil on account of their views! This archive proves the agenda that you and
B'nai Brith have regarding FREE SPEECH and it looks very communistic!

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3df2a771.119319192%40news5.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nanaimo BC Resident Ken McVay lies about his agenda to stifle FREE
SPEECH R_1207
Message-ID: <3df2a771....@news5.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 8 Dec 2002 01:58:44 GMT

>I guess you should start the anonymous publication of 900-line
>incomprehensible rants about Canadians, too, dimwit. Eh?

Personal attack is not a refutation of what I post. My truths rain down on you
and pummel you like the Biblical hailstones upon the wicked. You have yet to
refute what I post and all you can do is propagate lies and smears about such as
those you have in your smear link below which I have also debunked as lies and
perjury!

>
>Bradbury: http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott/

Thoroughly debunked with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>

---
>I ask-- why do we never see Jews criticize the communism
>which existed before Stalin took control?

"Because there was very little to criticize."
Susan Cohen - January 24, 2001
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&selm=3A6F230F.3AFF4272%40his.com
Message-ID: <3A6F230F...@his.com>

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

0 new messages