> I'm going to clam up for a while. It has recently come to my
> attention that it's time for Kent and me to put away our petty
> differences and concentrate squarely on a much more pressing matter
> than just simply who is better than whom.
> Did anybody here stop to read the entire post of "Pig Guts"? Once
> you get past the first paragraph, it's plain to see a scenario that
> needs fixing. A great injustice is being carried out and I intend to
> stop it.
Don't give yourself airs. The problem is one requiring exquisite
subtlety and deep understanding of the human condition, and you are a
homeless bashing loser without a brain in your head who delights in
causing pain, has zero people skills, cannot think past external
appearences, is provably two-faced, and cannot be trusted.
You are explicitly not invited to participate.
Go clean up your own life, leave the lives of other people alone.
xanthian.
Just think how much you must be misjudging other people, if you
misjudged me enough to think that you and I have anything in common.
Geez, that sorts describes why you are incapable of keeping a full-time job,
right? :O(
Yo, shut the fuck up, Chico, man. I could take three of your lines out of
context and make you into a hippopotamus.
Julian
--
I see the sunshine through
the eyes of a clown
>> delights in causing pain, has zero
>> people skills, cannot think past
>> external appearences, is provably
>> two-faced, and cannot be trusted.
> Geez, that sorts describes why you are
> incapable of keeping a full-time job,
> right? :O(
This from a brainless hate-spewer who
isn't holding a full-time job himself,
whose "self-employment" drives his
customers into bankruptcy, and whose
"research skills" prove laughably
bollixed every single time he displays
them online?
Pardon me while I let you suck on this:
xanthian.
Geez, that's cute. So what other pearls of wisdom can you utter after a few
bong hits? :O|
I'm working enough to pay the rent.
> whose "self-employment" drives his
> customers into bankruptcy,
You have proof of that? Please share it with us.
>> This from a brainless hate-spewer who
>> isn't holding a full-time job himself,
> I'm working enough to pay the rent.
Not on the kind of places I live when I'm working, you aren't.
Two of my last three houses were 5 bedroom or larger in elegant
communities, all three were on over a half acre, one with a pool,
one with river access.
More the fool me to let my wives drive me house poor, frankly.
>> whose "self-employment" drives his customers into bankruptcy,
> You have proof of that? Please share it with us.
Excuse me? You, the great researcher, cannot find your _own_
posting in which you describe a client driven into bankruptcy
by your services, from whom you were nevertheless trying to
wring a fee? Far be it from me to do your homework for you,
Junior pismire. Show off those web research skills, and do it
yourself. Report back with the URL and the "mandatory to show
you have the gonads to do it" apology.
xanthian, yo, ho, ho! Plain to see, Stan's forgot the Net's
persistency!
And if you claim it's not there and I then show it to you anyway, what
are you going to do besides shoot yourself for the lying moron you
are, which is not nearly sufficient for me to go to the trouble?
Well, I think that perfectly illustrates what I have been saying about
basic budgeting. You make it clear in this statement that even when
you are employed, you simply, flat out refuse to live within your
means. I can use up my entire pay check on such first class living
also and put up a flimsy facade of being a billionaire on my trash
hauler salary. But, why bother? I pay only for my basic needs and
will under no circumstances allow slick marketers to dictate what I
should have. Therefore, in times of unemployment, et al, I still
have a roof over my head while your security was totally wasted
by your reckless, irresponsible behaviour. Then, you blame
ouside forces for your current position.
Furthermore, why is it that you keep claiming Stan is a non entity
for not having a boss? To follow your obviously faulty logic, the
man who owns the pizza shop around the corner from me and
the man I payed to fix my antique light fixture are also non entities
because they are not directly employed by anybody. Correction,
Mon Idiot, they are employed by themselves. They EARN cash
by providing me and the rest of the community with valued
services while you provide nothing but wild fish stories about the
same.
> "Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote:
>> "Stan Rothwell, client bankrupter" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> "Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote:
>>>> This from a brainless hate-spewer who
>>>> isn't holding a full-time job himself,
>>> I'm working enough to pay the rent.
>> Not on the kind of places I live when I'm
>> working, you aren't. Two of my last three
>> houses were 5 bedroom or larger in elegant
>> communities, all three were on over a half
>> acre, one with a pool, one with river access.
> I can use up my entire pay check on such first
> class living also and put up a flimsy facade
> of being a billionaire on my trash hauler
> salary.
Sorry, loser, but I make (just over) four times
what you do when I'm working, those
accomodations were not outside my means, just
outside my wives' ability to budget money, and I
was one of those husbands who simply endorsed
his paycheck to his wife's account, since money
is not on my hit parade of things about which I
want to waste my life worrying.
> Furthermore, why is it that you keep claiming
> Stan is a non entity for not having a boss?
Stan _has_ a boss. Stan Rothwell is a
non-entity in _any_ situation, like you, or he
wouldn't be wasting his life homeless bashing,
like you. Then again, there is nothing yet to
show that you are not one and the same person,
and much to indicate that you are.
But Stan Rothwell cannot in the case, hold a
full time job, and makes a pretense of being an
Internet researcher, the rest of his time, while
demonstrating repeatedly that he has no ability
to distinguish bogus data from reliable data, no
skills at Internet research at all. Very likely
this is what has lead at least one of his
clients into bankruptcy, bad data from a bad
egg. Getting the research data on which your
company's well being depends from a flagrant
pathological liar tends to have that effect.
xanthian.
> Sorry, loser, but I make (just over) four times
> what you do when I'm working, those
> accomodations were not outside my means, just
> outside my wives' ability to budget money.............
Mr Dolan:
Don't know if you remember our exchange in the past or not. Something you
felt strongly enough to email me about.
Anyway, I am requesting you to remove misc.legal from your newsgroup
headings.
Thanks.
-- astri
Can't, not enough room, limited to five and I've already got misc.misc
and alt.anagrams as constants.
> >Mr Dolan:
> >Don't know if you remember our exchange in the past or not. Something you
> >felt strongly enough to email me about.
> >Anyway, I am requesting you to remove misc.legal from your newsgroup
> >headings.
> >Thanks.
I cannot remember names past five seconds, that function in my brain
went undeveloped, but this thread has certainly veered from the
original reason misc.legal was in the headers, which was _copied_ by
the thread renamer from another thread entirely, so sure.
xanthian.
> astri <as...@lava.net> wrote:
> > ooooooo, now you've done it. now he's going to add misc.legal to *all*
his
> > posts.
>
> Can't, not enough room, limited to five and I've already got misc.misc
> and alt.anagrams as constants.
A ng about anagrams? It sounds cool.
>
> > >Mr Dolan:
> > >Don't know if you remember our exchange in the past or not. Something
you
> > >felt strongly enough to email me about.
> > >Anyway, I am requesting you to remove misc.legal from your newsgroup
> > >headings.
> > >Thanks.
>
> I cannot remember names past five seconds, that function in my brain
> went undeveloped,
That's ok, I'm not all that good with names either, but I never forget a
face.
It was a while ago too, but for some reason your name stuck in my head.
>but this thread has certainly veered from the
> original reason misc.legal was in the headers, which was _copied_ by
> the thread renamer from another thread entirely, so sure.
>
> xanthian.
Thanks. :-) I knew I could count on you.