So good I had to share.
Keith Alexander®
into the symbol, or the person is pushy, whatever.
But this guy here, he wins the cake. I told him
he'd have to do a consultation via email before
we talk on the phone. He replied pretty snippy
about that and told me everything except what he wanted.
So I write back (which I normally wouldn't do) and said
"All I need to know is design, size and placement and then
we'll talk." I got this back. In red on black HTML email
no less.
---
"LOOK DICK HEAD!
I HATE TO DISAPPOINT YOUR STUPID ASS NO I'M MUCH OLDER THAN 12 YOU
SOUND LIKE ONE OF THOSE COMPUTER PEDOPHILES WHO SITS ON HIS COMPUTER
ALL DAY WANKING OFF WITH FUCK ALL ELSE TO DO. I WAS SERIOUS ABOUT
HIRING YOU TO DO A BRANDING NOT JUST FOR MYSELF BUT MY WHOLE BAND.
NOW I THOUGHT MY LETTER WAS VERY COMPLEMENTARY TO YOU IF ANYTHING
ELSE AND YOU HAD TO COME AT ME WITH YOUR SHITTY ATTITUDE.YOU SOUND
LIKE A BITTER OLD QUEEN WITH NO FUCKIN LIFE WE ARE HERE RECORDING AN
ALBUM & EVERYTIME WE COME BACK FROM DROPPING A TRACK IT'S YOUR STUPID
ASS AGAIN?LOOK MAN WE ARE REAL RECORDING ARTISTS WE ARE BUSY! DON'T
WORRY WE WILL BE BACK IN L. A SOON AND WE'VE ALREADY FOUND SOMEONE
ELSE WHO IS QUITE CAPABLE AND WAY COOLER THAN YOU! ANYWAYZ OUR A&R GUY
AT OUR LABEL KNOWS DEE & HE WANTS TO FORWARD YOUR STUPID E MAILS TO
HIM SO HE CAN GET A GOOD LAUGH TOO WE CAN'T WAIT TO HERE ALL ABOUT
YOUR "STINT" ANYWAYS YOU TRANSPARENT LITTLE LAME ASS FUCK! WE'VE COME
TO THE UNMISTAKABLE CONCLUSION THE REASON YOU DON'T GIVE YOUR ADDRESS
OR PHONE# OUT ON YOUR SITE IS YOUR ATTITUDE IS SO SNOTTY & SHITTY
THERE'D BE A LINE UP AROUND THE BLOCK TO KICK YOUR BITCH ASS WHY ELSE!
BUT THEN OF COURSE YOU WOULD SNITCH AND ACCUSE THEM OF A HATE CRIME
CAUSE YOU ARE SUCH A BIG FAG! ANYWISE WE'VE ALREADY PUT WAY TO MUCH
ENERGY INTO YOUR LAME ASS NOW PISS OFF! STOP BUGGIN GET OVER WHATEVER
IS UP YOUR ASS & WHILE YOUR AT IT GO DO YOUR SELF AND THE WORLD A
FAVOR & KILL YOURSELF LITTLE BITCH! FUCK OFF!!
ANYYWAYZ WE'RE TRYING TO GET READY FOR OZZFEST SO DON'T EXPECT ANYMORE
REPLIES TO YOUR DUMB ASS E MAILS AS I SAID BEFORE WE ARE BUSY GET
OVER YOURSELF YOU PARANOID DELUSIONAL EGOMANIAC GO BACK TO FUCKIN
TWISTED SISTER OR SOME SHIT OR BRANDING LEATHER FAGS OK!
---
Awesome, huh?
Yes. An AOL address.
---
k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
http://www.nootrope.net
http://www.modernamerican.com
aim: nootrope9 .|..
- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> ANYYWAYZ WE'RE TRYING TO GET READY FOR OZZFEST
this was my favorite part.
Curt
>*** I get lots of requests that I turn down. I'm not into the symbol,
>or the person is pushy, whatever.
Did you read what he wrote? It seems apparent that you wrote him or
them more than one email. He had some very specific comments and they
don't sound as if they appeared out of the blue, but rather in
response to, yeah, some rude comments you may've made.
>But this guy here, he wins the cake. I told him he'd have to do a
>consultation via email before we talk on the phone. He replied pretty
>snippy about that and told me everything except what he wanted.
>So I write back (which I normally wouldn't do) and said "All I need
>to know is design, size and placement and then we'll talk." I got this
>back. In red on black HTML email no less.
>
>"LOOK <snip here and elsewhere> NO I'M MUCH OLDER THAN 12
Looks like a reply to me. Did you ask him if he was a 12-year-old?
>AND YOU HAD TO COME AT ME WITH YOUR SHITTY ATTITUDE.
Is he referring to your simple request for a consultation via email or
your query about the design, size and placement of the brand?
>YOU SOUND LIKE A BITTER OLD QUEEN WITH NO FUCKIN LIFE
Again, what's he talking about here? /You sound like/ gives me the
impression that he's talking about something you said to him.
Something more than a direct and professional request for information.
What have you left out?
>EVERYTIME WE COME BACK FROM DROPPING A TRACK IT'S
>YOUR STUPID ASS AGAIN?
Sounds like multiple emails from KA®, wouldn't you say? Irritating and
annoying emails as well.
>YOUR ATTITUDE IS SO SNOTTY & SHITTY
As in arrogant, I imagine. That could be you, or am I in left field?
>STOP BUGGIN
I snipped much, but all this "stop buggin" comment, I'm curious, is in
reply to how many emails from you (something which you normally
wouldn't do) to Mr. Angry All Caps Boy? One? Two? Two emails just
asking for specifics about their brand placement, all professional and
polite? Yeah. Right. You've got a bridge to sell me, too?
>SO DON'T EXPECT ANYMORE REPLIES TO YOUR DUMB ASS
>E MAILS
Just how many emails did you send to them?
>Awesome, huh?
Absolutely.
>Yes. An AOL address.
It's all about the ISP, isn't it? You latch onto his AOL address as an
insult. So how much of a stretch is it for anyone to believe that you
were insulting and difficult in your repeated emails to him?
>k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
>http://www.nootrope.net
>http://www.modernamerican.com
>aim: nootrope9
I'm truly not attacking you, but what you present here, imo, paints
you in a much poorer light than the person with whom you were
corresponding. Take away the all caps and give the person an earthlink
address and then what do you have to harp about?
--
Curt
Richard Hunter
bus, Curt <curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wailed loudly and
vomited the words:
>KA® <keith@REMOVE!nootrope.net> wrote:
>
>>*** I get lots of requests that I turn down. I'm not into the symbol,
>>or the person is pushy, whatever.
>
>Did you read what he wrote? It seems apparent that you wrote him or
>them more than one email. He had some very specific comments and they
>don't sound as if they appeared out of the blue, but rather in
>response to, yeah, some rude comments you may've made.
no! keef!? rude!? i'm sure you're mistaken, sir.
<snip>
>>YOUR ATTITUDE IS SO SNOTTY & SHITTY
>
>As in arrogant, I imagine. That could be you, or am I in left field?
i'm perplexed! why would you think keef's arrogant? oh, wait.
yeah, you're right. :)
<snip>
>>Yes. An AOL address.
>
>It's all about the ISP, isn't it? You latch onto his AOL address as an
>insult. So how much of a stretch is it for anyone to believe that you
>were insulting and difficult in your repeated emails to him?
did you read the guy's response? it's rife with spelling,
grammar, and puncuation errors. it's not all about his ISP.
it's about two idiots in an email pissing contest, except this
jerkoff is funnier than Keef. rather, more fun to make fun of.
of course i'm not saying it's not fun to make fun of Keef; it is.
incredibly fun.
<snip>
>I'm truly not attacking you, but what you present here, imo, paints
>you in a much poorer light than the person with whom you were
>corresponding. Take away the all caps and give the person an earthlink
>address and then what do you have to harp about?
i'm truly not attacking you, either. but give the guy a couple
of brain cells to rub together and teach him the basic tenets of
the english language....you see where i'm going, right?
good.
carry on. :)
david
--
"Hi, my name is Gwen and I'm here to
wash your vagina." -Margaret Cho, from the
movie "I'm The One That I Want"
Curt
I wrote:
>
>>KAŽ <keith@REMOVE!nootrope.net> wrote:<snip>
about a nastygram he'd received
>did you read the guy's response? it's rife with spelling,
Actually, it's not. Complementary should have been complimentary and
he misspelled the word anyways twice, but other than dropping a g off
the end of some of his words ending in ing, there were no other
spelling errors.
>grammar, and puncuation errors.
Whatever. That wasn't my point. My point was that Keith's "So good I
had to share." item was something that he, perhaps, shouldn't have
shared at all. And I wasn't making fun of him or the other people
involved.
>><snip>Take away the all caps and give the person an earthlink
>>address and then what do you have to harp about?
re: whoever wrote to Keith
><snip>give the guy a couple of brain cells to rub together and
>teach him the basic tenets of the english language<snip>
You're wrong. Now get back in your porcelain bus and wail loudly into
the new year, David. <g>
--
Curt
Nina Baltes
> You're wrong. Now get back in your porcelain bus and wail loudly into
> the new year, David. <g>
Somehow I'm reminded of "Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem" where
the zombies will occasionally go at each other instead of attacking
the player.
Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net
fr0glet
Straight out of "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back". Har!
fr0glet
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>Looks like a reply to me. Did you ask him if he was a 12-year-old?
*** Yes.
#1: I want a branding and yada
me: Tell me what and where
#2: You fucking suck and that's stupid
me: what are you 12?
#3: posted
Thanks for taking the time, Curt.
---
k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
http://www.nootrope.net
http://www.modernamerican.com
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>Take away the all caps and give the person an earthlink
>address and then what do you have to harp about?
*** Ahaha.
Leather fag, dropping tracks, anywayz,
fwd to Dee, recording artists, Ozzfest...
But the fact is, it is in all caps, and the fact
is it's red on black. And the fact is, you still
talk about things you don't understand.
Anyone who asks me for a cutting or branding goes
through the same process. They all get treated the
same way. Those that aren't assholes get the work
and those that are fade away. I make a nice
amount of money doing this work, It's not in my
best interest to piss honest and sincere people
off. But people like this guy, that's just fun.
And he sure acted 12.
Keep trying, Curt.
---
k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
http://www.nootrope.net
http://www.modernamerican.com
Curt
re: an email exchange
>#1: I want a branding and yada
>me: Tell me what and where
>#2: You fucking suck and that's stupid
Wasn't it "YOU FUCKING SUCK AND THAT'S STUPID!"?
Regardless, I find it difficult to believe that your
only response was "Tell me what and where."
>me: what are you 12?
>#3: posted
>
>Thanks for taking the time, Curt.
Your reply was so benign as you describe? Plus you
present it as if you only sent two emails to the other.
I call bullshit.
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>I call bullshit.
*** That matters to me?
The email is a pisser regardless.
And coming from you, someone who will even
try to get the Marvin's of this world to
like him...
Curt
I wrote:
>>Take away the all caps and give the person an earthlink
>>address and then what do you have to harp about?
>
>*** Ahaha.
>
>Leather fag, dropping tracks, anywayz,
>fwd to Dee, recording artists, Ozzfest...
So you're calling him a liar? You believe he's a name
caller and that he's made statements that were untrue
in order to make himself look good in your eyes?
>But the fact is, it is in all caps, and the fact
>is it's red on black. And the fact is, you still
>talk about things you don't understand.
I made a comment regarding your post because I believe
you were and are leaving things out or only telling
your side of the story. Your position is that you're
the professional and only asked what was reasonable of
a prospective client?
I understand that I don't believe you.
>Anyone who asks me for a cutting or branding goes
>through the same process. They all get treated the
>same way. Those that aren't assholes get the work
>and those that are fade away. I make a nice
>amount of money doing this work, It's not in my
>best interest to piss honest and sincere people
>off. But people like this guy, that's just fun.
>And he sure acted 12.
>
>Keep trying, Curt.
Try? No. Succeed? Yes.
You define your terms. I'll define mine.
--
Curt
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>I understand that I don't believe you.
*** I understand that the email I received
regardless of what led up to it, was hilarious
in the extreme.
I also understand that your attempt to dissect
it has biblical undertones.
I have a leather fag to brand next week, I'll
let you know how it goes.
Curt
>The email is a pisser regardless.
The email is funny, but your suggestion that you were so
innocent <blink, blink... lil' doe eyes> is even funnier.
><snip>you, someone who will even try to get the
>Marvin's of this world to like him...
Why http://inksmith.biz whatever http://inksmith.biz are
http://inksmith.biz you http://inksmith.biz talking
http://inksmith.biz about? http://inksmith.biz
--
Curt
Curt
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:00:29 -0500, Curt
><curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I understand that I don't believe you.
>
>*** I understand that the email I received
>regardless of what led up to it,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thank you.
>was hilarious in the extreme.
>
>I also understand that your attempt to dissect
>it has biblical undertones.
>
>I have a leather fag to brand next week, I'll
>let you know how it goes.
I look forward to that.
>k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
>http://www.nootrope.net
>http://www.modernamerican.com
>aim: nootrope9 .|..
>
>- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
--
Curt
http://iam.bmezine.com/?curt
http://www.curtjames.com/
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>>regardless of what led up to it,
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Thank you.
*** And what led up to it was what I stated.
---
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>Why http://inksmith.biz whatever http://inksmith.biz are
>http://inksmith.biz you http://inksmith.biz talking
>http://inksmith.biz about? http://inksmith.biz
*** Supporting people who demonstrate how little
they think of the art or RAB says more
about you than I ever could.
Curt
I wrote:
>
>>Why http://inksmith.biz whatever http://inksmith.biz are
>>http://inksmith.biz you http://inksmith.biz talking
>>http://inksmith.biz about? http://inksmith.biz
>
>*** Supporting people
It's a URL. Connects to a Web site. They sell tattoo stuff.
>who demonstrate how little they think of the art
And just how exactly did he do that?
>or RAB
Aren't you the one who said he posted his URL incorrectly and to
be considered as spam only once?
I'm not sure that he even included it in his helpful Santa Rosa
reply.
He made a mistake, got chewed on, overreacted. Not unusual.
What has he done *to RAB* other than display rude, overly
sensitive, self-aggrandizing behavior? Sound familiar?
>says more about you than I ever could.
You're the model citizen.
>k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
>http://www.nootrope.net
>http://www.modernamerican.com
>aim: nootrope9 .|..
>
>- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>And just how exactly did he do that?
*** By selling kits without claves. By reacting
the way he did. I have a problem with the use
of the word "faggot" by certain types of people.
>Aren't you the one who said he posted his URL incorrectly and to
>be considered as spam only once?
*** I don't like people reporting individuals
to their ISPs.
>You're the model citizen.
*** I certainly contribute my share of information
to the "community" and I refuse to suffer fools gladly.
I also refuse to stand idly by while terminology
is misused.
---
Curt
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:29:22 -0500, Curt
><curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>regardless of what led up to it,
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>Thank you.
>
>*** And what led up to it was what I stated.
Nuh uh. I call bullshit again. I understand that that means
nothing to you. Still.
You said something like, "Hello, sir. What design and where
would you like it?"
And their response was something like, "DICK HEAD!
STUPID ASS! I'M OLDER THAN 12! YOU COMPUTER
PEDOPHILE WANKER SHITTY ATTITUDE. BITTER OLD
QUEEN LITTLE LAME ASS FUCK! SNOTTY & SHITTY
BITCH ASS BIG FAG! LAME ASS LITTLE BITCH! FUCK
OFF!! PARANOID DELUSIONAL EGOMANIAC."
When, again, did you ask if they were 12 years old?
You just had to share. Good for you. You've got your fans.
I'm just not one of them. You offer MTV's Real World, but
I'd rather have something honest and unedited like
http://www.jennicam.org/.
>k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
>http://www.nootrope.net
>http://www.modernamerican.com
>aim: nootrope9 .|..
>
>- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>You said something like, "Hello, sir. What design and where
>would you like it?"
Them: I want a brand. What's your #?
Me: I begin consultations via email.
Them: That's fucked, you suck, good-bye.
Me: What are you, 12?
Them: What I posted.
Take it or leave it Curt. I've already
spent more time on your pathetic ass
than you deserve.
---
Curt
>*** <snip>I have a problem with the use of the word "faggot"
Indeed. http://tinyurl.com/3ews3
>by certain types of people.
>
>*** I don't like people reporting individuals to their ISPs.
Cool.
>*** I certainly contribute my share of information to the
>"community" and I refuse to suffer fools gladly. I also
>refuse to stand idly by while terminology is misused.
Bravo! I often enjoy the links you provide and your choice of a koi
design has led to some impressive tattoo work. Well done.
Still, I don't understand your aversion to tats as a nick for tattoos
and gauge as a synonym for stretch. I'm sure you're not surprised.
>k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
>http://www.nootrope.net
>http://www.modernamerican.com
>aim: nootrope9 .|..
>
>- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
Happy New Year to you.
Curt
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:16:28 -0500, Curt
><curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>You said something like, "Hello, sir. What design and where
>>would you like it?"
C'mon! You snipped the funny part.
| And their response was something like, "DICK HEAD!
| STUPID ASS! I'M OLDER THAN 12! YOU COMPUTER
| PEDOPHILE WANKER SHITTY ATTITUDE. BITTER OLD
| QUEEN LITTLE LAME ASS FUCK! SNOTTY & SHITTY
| BITCH ASS BIG FAG! LAME ASS LITTLE BITCH! FUCK
| OFF!! PARANOID DELUSIONAL EGOMANIAC."
>
>Them: I want a brand. What's your #?
>Me: I begin consultations via email.
>Them: That's fucked, you suck, good-bye.
>Me: What are you, 12?
>Them: What I posted.
Cool.
>Take it or leave it Curt. I've already spent more time on your
>pathetic ass than you deserve.
Yeah, you normally do. It's because you care. You're a gentleman
who would never stand idly by while someone commits an evil act.
Kudos!
>k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
>http://www.nootrope.net
>http://www.modernamerican.com
>aim: nootrope9 .|..
>
>- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
--
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>>*** <snip>I have a problem with the use of the word "faggot"
>Indeed. http://tinyurl.com/3ews3
*** "Indeed," my ass. You continue to post his URL
thereby supporting him and putting money in his
pockets.
>Bravo!
*** Oh, shut the fuck up already.
>your choice of a koi design has led to some impressive tattoo work.
*** My choice of *artist* led to the work. I claim zero
credit for the tattoo.
>Well done.
*** Dork.
>Still, I don't understand your aversion to tats as a nick for tattoos
>and gauge as a synonym for stretch.
*** That's because you choose not to understand.
I've clearly stated why quite a few times over the years.
---
Curt
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:09:47 -0500, Curt
><curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:<snip>
>
>*** <snip>You continue to post his URL thereby supporting him and
>putting money in his pockets.
Oh, he's a /millionaire/. What difference does an extra order matter?
>*** Oh, shut the fuck up already.
You first! Neener, neener.
>>your choice of a koi design has led to some impressive tattoo work.
>
>*** My choice of *artist* led to the work. I claim zero credit for the
>tattoo.
But you did choose the koi as the theme or subject, right? I gave you
credit for that choice. Perhaps I shouldn't have. You're disagreeable.
>>Well done.
>
>*** Dork.
Guilty as charged.
>>Still, I don't understand your aversion to tats as a nick for tattoos
>>and gauge as a synonym for stretch.
>
>*** That's because you choose not to understand.
Yeppers! That is true.
>I've clearly stated why quite a few times over the years.
A clear statement doesn't mean it makes sense. And, woah there, lil'
horsey! Haven't you spent enough time on this dork?
>k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
>http://www.nootrope.net
>http://www.modernamerican.com
>aim: nootrope9 .|..
>
>- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
^^^^^^^
WTF? Perhaps an interruption in transmission, but certainly not end.
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
Curt
I scribbled:
>> You're wrong. Now get back in your porcelain bus and wail loudly into
>> the new year, David. <g>
>
>Somehow I'm reminded of "Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem" where
>the zombies will occasionally go at each other instead of attacking
>the player.
:p
When I was a kid, there was this guy with a panel truck, primer gray,
and a stencil on the door: BROTHERHOOD OF ZOMBIES. Too cool.
And Happy New Year 2004 to RABbits (and zombies) everywhere!
You'll excuse me as I return to gnawing on David's skull. Thanks.
--o--
must be someone from Slipknot :)
Chumley
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> writes:
>You define your terms. I'll define mine.
Hey Curt, could you define em somewhere else, you're still an annoying suck up.
Chumley The Happy Clown
Eric S.
news:vlh6vvgolevctbmg7...@4ax.com...
>
> You'll excuse me as I return to gnawing on David's skull. Thanks.
By skull I assume you mean 'head'. Yeah, I can see you gnawing on his
'head'. You are definitely gay.
-- Eric S.
Curt
>"Curt" <curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>> You'll excuse me as I return to gnawing on David's skull. Thanks.
>
> By skull
Hello Eric.
>I assume you mean 'head'.
Fellatio? No.
'Head' as in what zombies do in movies. "BRAAAINS, BRRAAAAINS,
BRRAAAAIIINS, BRRRRRAAAAiINSSsS!" Not a movie fan, are you?
>Yeah, I can see you gnawing on his 'head'.
Cock head? Oh, that's so witty. So cute. See, I was talking about a
skull and you, I believe, knew I was talking about a skull, but
decided to make the leap to head and from there to gay. I'm giving you
more credit than you deserve?
Did you really think I was talking about fellatio, Eric?
>You are definitely gay.
No. I'm heterosexual, Eric. Now then. Were you trying to compliment
me? Or do you use gay as a term of derision? Were you using gay in the
pejorative? If that's the case then shame on you.
Be direct next time. Say what you mean. Don't beat around the bush.
And, no, Eric, I don't mean 'bush' as in pubic hair.
Sunlight
Keith Alexander® <keith@REMOVE!nootrope.net> wrote:
> *** By selling kits without claves. By reacting
> the way he did. I have a problem with the use
> of the word "faggot" by certain types of people.
Mmm, faggots! The other half's going into town today, think I might get him
to pick up some faggots from the market for tea!
Mmm, faggots, peas and mash! With gravy!
darklily
> DRLG wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> >
> >>KA® <keith@REMOVE!nootrope.net> wrote:<snip>
> about a nastygram he'd received
>
> >did you read the guy's response? it's rife with spelling,
>
> Actually, it's not. Complementary should have been complimentary and
> he misspelled the word anyways twice, but other than dropping a g off
> the end of some of his words ending in ing, there were no other
> spelling errors.
>
> >grammar, and puncuation errors.
>
I'm just a lurker...but there are several other spelling errors you
missed.
>ELSE WHO IS QUITE CAPABLE AND WAY COOLER THAN YOU! ANYWAYZ OUR A&R
GUY
>AT OUR LABEL KNOWS DEE & HE WANTS TO FORWARD YOUR STUPID E MAILS TO
>HIM SO HE CAN GET A GOOD LAUGH TOO WE CAN'T WAIT TO HERE ALL ABOUT
"Here" should be "hear."
>CAUSE YOU ARE SUCH A BIG FAG! ANYWISE WE'VE ALREADY PUT WAY TO MUCH
>ENERGY INTO YOUR LAME ASS NOW PISS OFF! STOP BUGGIN GET OVER WHATEVER
"To" should be "too."
>IS UP YOUR ASS & WHILE YOUR AT IT GO DO YOUR SELF AND THE WORLD A
>FAVOR & KILL YOURSELF LITTLE BITCH! FUCK OFF!!
"Your" should be "you're" or probably more correctly "you are."
These mistakes involve homophones, words that sound alike but are
spelled differently.
Occasional misspellings or typos don't usually annoy me. I'm prone to
them as well, and I find it really aggravating when the best someone
can do when replying/disagreeing with a post is point out spelling
errors. However, that e-mail goes beyond a little "oops...my hand
slipped while I was typing." That was nearly unreadable. If that
e-mail was indicative of their everday writing competency, then that
person should never have graduated from high-school. When
corresponding with someone regarding business, more is expected than
in an occasional note. That e-mail was unprofessional and insulting in
more than the intent of its words. It showed a crassness in the mere
disregard for the proper use of language. On top of that it shows that
the writer has never heard of spell-check (which these days also
includes a grammar-check).
Darklily
Curt
I scribbled:<snip>
>
>> DRLG wrote:<snip>
>> >did you read the guy's response? it's rife with spelling,
>>
>
>I'm just a lurker...but there are several other spelling errors you
>missed.
DRLG, you were right. I only noticed the two misspellings, but
obviously there were more which qualifies the email as 'rife'.
My apologies, David. Thank you, Darklily.
>These mistakes involve homophones, words that sound alike but are
>spelled differently.
<snip>
><snip>high-school<snip>
I've never seen high school hyphenated, but I didn't notice the
typos/misspellings you caught, so...
>Darklily
Homophone trivia:
For there versus their I think that 'there' has the word here in it
and then think of location: "It's here or there." Their has an i in it
and so it shows possession: "It's their home."
--
Curt (And, not a homophone, but still: ect. instead of etc.)
http://iam.bmezine.com/?curt | http://curtjames.com/
Richard Hunter
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> coughed and sputtered, and managed
to choke out these words:
>Darklilly dark...@hotmail.com wrote:
>I scribbled:<snip>
>>
>>> DRLG wrote:<snip>
>>> >did you read the guy's response? it's rife with spelling,
>>>
>>> Actually, it's not.<snip>
>>
>>I'm just a lurker...but there are several other spelling errors you
>>missed.
><snip the many additional errors>
>
>DRLG, you were right. I only noticed the two misspellings, but
>obviously there were more which qualifies the email as 'rife'.
>My apologies, David.
Kein Problem.
david :)
--
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/derbarbier/
(ebay sales)
http://shops.half.com/derbarbier
stickneedlesinme at mindspring dot com
darklily
> Darklilly dark...@hotmail.com wrote:
> ><snip>high-school<snip>
>
> I've never seen high school hyphenated, but I didn't notice the
> typos/misspellings you caught, so...
>
> >Darklily
Oops. No, I think you are right. See, even I screw up sometimes.
I guess I should cut, paste and spell-check my posts from now on. ;)
Darklily
(who does at least spell-check her e-mail and work related documents)
(wondering if work related should be hyphenated)
fr0glet
> Darklily
> (who does at least spell-check her e-mail and work related documents)
> (wondering if work related should be hyphenated)
Neither spell check nor email should be hyphenated, so don't sweat
work-related. ;)
fr0glet
--
"You cannot be an objective scientist if you have an agenda."
~The Madman
Curt
x
>
> And, no, Eric, I don't mean 'bush' as in pubic hair.
>
That's 'cause you're gay. Gay men rarely talk about bush.
They're too busy gnawing on head. Like you.
--
x
"being the smartest window-licker on the shortbus doesn't make you a genius"
By the way, I'm petty and snide.
Dumbass Dentistry -
it's all fun and games until vegetation starts growing in someone's
pulmonary valved conduit.
tootmeoldfruit
message news:YjyJb.15906$FN....@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> Mmm, faggots! The other half's going into town today, think I might get
him
> to pick up some faggots from the market for tea!
>
> Mmm, faggots, peas and mash! With gravy!
OOoooOOOo Brain's Faggotts mmmMMmmmMmmmm
--
Carmen xxx
If life's a beach, where's my ice-cream?
"
Sunlight
tootmeoldfruit <tootmeo...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> OOoooOOOo Brain's Faggotts mmmMMmmmMmmmm
Nah, I like the ones from the dodgy butcher in Central Market.
They were lush!
Richard Hunter
<ms.su...@notbloodylikely.ntlworld.com.invalid> coughed and
sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>
>tootmeoldfruit <tootmeo...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>
>> OOoooOOOo Brain's Faggotts mmmMMmmmMmmmm
>
>Nah, I like the ones from the dodgy butcher in Central Market.
http://www.centralmarket.com/cm/index.jsp
david
Curt
>That's 'cause you're gay.
Hello x.
>Gay men rarely talk about bush.
I can neither confirm nor deny this statement. I'll trust you speak
from experience? <Seinfeld>Not that that's a bad thing.</Seinfeld>
>They're too busy gnawing on head.
I would imagine that a gay man wouldn't be prone to gnaw. Unless he
didn't particularly like his partner.
>Like you.
Missed this, did you?
| I'm heterosexual<snip> Were you trying to compliment me?
| Or do you use gay as a term of derision? Were you using
| gay in the pejorative? If that's the case then shame on you.
On topic RAB: Septum piercing, 14 gauge, lovin' it.
http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/septum.html
x
> x wrote:<snip>
> >That's 'cause you're gay.
>
> Hello x.
>
> >Gay men rarely talk about bush.
>
> I can neither confirm nor deny this statement. I'll trust you speak
> from experience? <Seinfeld>Not that that's a bad thing.</Seinfeld>
Yes, I am talking from experience, i have a multitude of gay friends.
They talk about breasts. Not boobs.
> >They're too busy gnawing on head.
>
> I would imagine that a gay man wouldn't be prone to gnaw. Unless he
> didn't particularly like his partner.
Or they're not particularily good at it, which, since you're not gay, I
would imagine you wouldn't be.
> >Like you.
>
> Missed this, did you?
>
> | I'm heterosexual<snip> Were you trying to compliment me?
> | Or do you use gay as a term of derision? Were you using
> | gay in the pejorative? If that's the case then shame on you.
No, that doesn't mean you don't gnaw on head. And are likely very happy when
doing it. What then, do you think I missed?
> On topic RAB: Septum piercing, 14 gauge, lovin' it.
You insist you don't gnaw on head, yet you got your septum pierced THAT
small?
C'mon. you know the only reason to get it that small is so that large
jewellery doesn't get in the way of your gnawing glee.
x
news:ijzKb.13784$1g41...@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> "Curt" <curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ci6kvv0sgi3au8462...@4ax.com...
> > x wrote:<snip>
> > >That's 'cause you're gay.
> >
> > Hello x.
> >
> > >Gay men rarely talk about bush.
> >
> > I can neither confirm nor deny this statement. I'll trust you speak
> > from experience? <Seinfeld>Not that that's a bad thing.</Seinfeld>
>
> Yes, I am talking from experience, i have a multitude of gay friends.
> They talk about breasts. Not boobs.
>
Gah. too early. Not enough caffeine. That should read:
"They talk about breasts. Not bush."
Sunlight
Richard Hunter <returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
> http://www.centralmarket.com/cm/index.jsp
More like http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/cardiffmarket/events.htm
:-)
Sunlight
x <som...@somewhere.cxm> wrote:
> You insist you don't gnaw on head, yet you got your septum pierced
> THAT small?
> C'mon. you know the only reason to get it that small is so that large
> jewellery doesn't get in the way of your gnawing glee.
Well, mneaaarrrghghghgh, what do you think retainers are for! I'd get one
for my septum so I could GOBBLE UNRESERVEDLY on the old PURPLE POLICEMAN!
x
message news:9PCKb.18517$FN.1...@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
Yes, but that's because you have LOTS of EXPERIENCE.
He's "heterosexual", so he doesn't know all the secrets, yet.
Besides, he gnaws, as opposed to gobbles...
the retainer would likely get knocked out, what with all the enthusiasm.
fr0glet
>>
>>> large jewellery doesn't get in the way of your gnawing glee.
>>
Alright, damnit, there are men out there who ENJOY being GNAWED UPON!!
x
news:vvm3jpe...@corp.supernews.com...
> x <som...@somewhere.cxm> blurted:
> >>
> >>> large jewellery doesn't get in the way of your gnawing glee.
> >>
> > Besides, he gnaws, as opposed to gobbles...
>
> Alright, damnit, there are men out there who ENJOY being GNAWED UPON!!
>
True enough. Hey, I wasn't saying anything for or against gnawing.
I'm sure to properly gnaw, that is, to give the correct amount of
pain/pleasure response, and avoid any permanent UNwanted damage, you have to
be very good at it.
Thankfully for men that do enjoy it, you seem to imply that you are good at
it
(or, am i reading too much into your defence of gnaw-ers?). :)
fr0glet
> Thankfully for men that do enjoy it, you seem to imply that you are
> good at it
> (or, am i reading too much into your defence of gnaw-ers?). :)
Its really quite simple. The key is to keep your teeth wet.
Though if Shawn was here I'm sure he'd argue "NO LUBE! NO LUBE!".
Chumley
<som...@somewhere.cxm> writes:
>True enough. Hey, I wasn't saying anything for or against gnawing.
>I'm sure to properly gnaw, that is, to give the correct amount of
>pain/pleasure response, and avoid any permanent UNwanted damage, you have to
>be very good at it.
>
There's something to be said for no teeth.
I'm not saying anything else, on the topic.
Chumley The Happy Clown
Sunlight
x <som...@somewhere.cxm> wrote:
> Besides, he gnaws, as opposed to gobbles...
> the retainer would likely get knocked out, what with all the
> enthusiasm.
I am reminded of a rhyme.
Hannah Bantry, in the pantry,
Gnawing on a mutton bone
How she gnawed it, how she clawed it
When she found herself alone.
Curt
>><snip> i have a multitude of gay friends.
>> They talk about breasts. Not boobs.
>
>Gah. too early. Not enough caffeine. That should read:
>"They talk about breasts. Not bush."
HAR!
Don't you hate it when that happens? :p
But your original comment makes as much sense as your updated version.
i'll teach you to turn away.
C> <som...@somewhere.cxm> writes:
>>True enough. Hey, I wasn't saying anything for or against gnawing.
C> I'm not saying anything else, on the topic.
allow me to quote myself:
AngieK: hehe
Chumley: <crying>
http://compunction.dyndns.org/ihaterab3.txt
lish "well i, i might be wrong,
cr...@got.net but you, you tag along." -mm
39.3% / 30 RANA 125 / 68
Richard Hunter
<ms.su...@notbloodylikely.ntlworld.com.invalid> coughed and
sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>
>Richard Hunter <returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.centralmarket.com/cm/index.jsp
>
>More like http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/cardiffmarket/events.htm
r0x0r.
Suzy Smith
>
> x <som...@somewhere.cxm> blurted:
> > Thankfully for men that do enjoy it, you seem to imply that you are
> > good at it
> > (or, am i reading too much into your defence of gnaw-ers?). :)
>
> Its really quite simple. The key is to keep your teeth wet.
>
> Though if Shawn was here I'm sure he'd argue "NO LUBE! NO LUBE!".
Or just bite, don't gnaw. Depends on the man.
--
Suzy Smith
Landslide: http://mutteringfool.com
FBG: http://fatbottomedgirls.net
You don't like the sound of the truth, coming from my mouth...
x
> x wrote:
>
> >><snip> i have a multitude of gay friends.
> >> They talk about breasts. Not boobs.
> >
> >Gah. too early. Not enough caffeine. That should read:
> >"They talk about breasts. Not bush."
>
> HAR!
>
> Don't you hate it when that happens? :p
>
> But your original comment makes as much sense as your updated version.
>
Not really. Breasts/boobs are interchangeable, I doubt even a gay man would
ever confuse breasts/bush. (Unless referring to the current President, who
the could easily be confused a la: Bush/boob.)
And my comment referred to the fact that gay men really seem to like women
with large breasts, however, I have never heard their conversation with said
women carry over into talking about bush(President or female genitalia).
Richard Hunter
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
<snip>
> bush(President or female genitalia).
it was my impression that the "bush" was the hair around and to
the top of the opening of the female's genitalia. are you now
telling me that the *bush* is the genitalia? or would you like
to backpedal again?
x
news:ethovv0a6k818ncuo...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:09:52 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm>
> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>
> <snip>
> > bush(President or female genitalia).
>
> it was my impression that the "bush" was the hair around and to
> the top of the opening of the female's genitalia. are you now
> telling me that the *bush* is the genitalia? or would you like
> to backpedal again?
>
*Again*? Care to share when I've ever back-pedalled *before*?
BTW, what the fuck do you care about what I say about bush/genitalia, aren't
you too busy fucking anything that moves?
I'm not back-pedalling.
And my reference to the *hair on the genitalia* in general as *genitalia*
stands, as I really don't give a fuck whether you *got it* or not.
So, Mr. "Lishtrx Aquarius", go write a song about pubic hair, now... long
beautiful pubic hair... or some such bullshit as you like.
Richard Hunter
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>"Richard Hunter" <returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote in message
>news:ethovv0a6k818ncuo...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:09:52 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm>
>> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>>
>> <snip>
>> > bush(President or female genitalia).
>>
>> it was my impression that the "bush" was the hair around and to
>> the top of the opening of the female's genitalia. are you now
>> telling me that the *bush* is the genitalia? or would you like
>> to backpedal again?
>>
>
>*Again*? Care to share when I've ever back-pedalled *before*?
oh, it was a couple of posts ago. you can look it up.
>BTW, what the fuck do you care about what I say about bush/genitalia, aren't
>you too busy fucking anything that moves?
actually, no. i'm busy typing, ATM.
>I'm not back-pedalling.
>And my reference to the *hair on the genitalia* in general as *genitalia*
>stands, as I really don't give a fuck whether you *got it* or not.
>So, Mr. "Lishtrx Aquarius", go write a song about pubic hair, now... long
>beautiful pubic hair... or some such bullshit as you like.
your memory fails you; i didn't write the parody of that song.
some other RABid did.
Purity
<returnt...@ddressunknown.com> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke
out these words:
>actually, no. i'm busy typing, ATM.
Richard, you really are exceptionally dull at the best of times.
please.
just don't.
Purity
x
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:53:36 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm>
> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>
> >"Richard Hunter" <returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote in message
> >news:ethovv0a6k818ncuo...@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:09:52 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm>
> >> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >> > bush(President or female genitalia).
> >>
> >> it was my impression that the "bush" was the hair around and to
> >> the top of the opening of the female's genitalia. are you now
> >> telling me that the *bush* is the genitalia? or would you like
> >> to backpedal again?
> >>
> >
> >*Again*? Care to share when I've ever back-pedalled *before*?
>
> oh, it was a couple of posts ago. you can look it up.
No, that's okay. You made the point, you must prove it. If you can.
If not, just retract it. I'll understand.
> your memory fails you; i didn't write the parody of that song.
> some other RABid did.
Yeah, it was me, genius. Have you gotten thicker over the years, or what?
Richard Hunter
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
<snip>
>Yeah, it was me, genius. Have you gotten thicker over the years, or what?
you were posting under a different moniker at that time. glad to
know who you are.
david
x
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:15:23 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm>
> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>
> <snip>
> >Yeah, it was me, genius. Have you gotten thicker over the years, or what?
>
> you were posting under a different moniker at that time. glad to
> know who you are.
Seeing as I re-posted it directly to you when I started posting under this
nick, and stated it was me, and seeing as my sig contains an unattributed
quote (which generally means it's attributable to the source... but then, I
suppose i could have just been trying to rip someone else off ) that was
widely attributed to my old nick by others...
You used to pick up on 'old shit' a lot quicker. You've really disappointed
me (not that that'll mean anything to you, but *sniff* you have).
And BTW, still no proof of back-pedalling. But, if you were referring to the
boobs/bush correction, that wasn't back-pedalling. I mis-typed a word and
corrected it, big difference. Back-pedalling generally refers to someone who
states something, and when is called on it and shown to be wrong, states
that they REALLY MEANT something else. It should have been obvious that I
meant 'bush' in the original post, and I was simply correcting a typo. See,
I admit my errors, and correct them when warranted.
That's not back-pedalling.
Have a nice day.
zmaj
> darklily <dark...@hotmail.com> blurted:
> > Darklily
> > (who does at least spell-check her e-mail and work related documents)
> > (wondering if work related should be hyphenated)
>
> Neither spell check nor email should be hyphenated, so don't sweat
> work-related. ;)
>
> fr0glet
Brilliant!!!
intergalactic snitty princess
>Have a nice day.
Loosely translated: Please shut the screaming fuck up; this thread has
gone on far too long.
~christyn.
***yank me to reply***
Curt
x wrote:
><snip>
>>Yeah, it was me, genius. Have you gotten thicker over the years, or what?
>
>you were posting under a different moniker at that time. glad to
>know who you are.
But you *don't* know who they are.
George/Jez/Purity/Ayala is a multiple-moniker marsupial. Wait. Damn,
RABbits don't have pouches. That woulda been sweet. Never mind.
OTOH: "Kangaroos do rather resemble giant bunnies, with their antenna
ears, chisel teeth, and leaping locomotion."
From 1996's
http://www.calacademy.org/calwild/pacdis/issues/summer96/bunny.htm
Curt
<snip>
>Brilliant!!!
I'malllikewhothefuckisthis?
Bless Google.
How'd your dragon turn out? Did I miss the URL posting of the finished
piece?
Richard Hunter
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 03:35:40 GMT, Richard Hunter
><returnt...@ddressunknown.com> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke
>out these words:
>
>
>>actually, no. i'm busy typing, ATM.
>
>
>Richard, you really are exceptionally dull at the best of times.
>
>please.
>
>just don't.
you think my name's richard, and *i'm* dull!?
ok, whatever.
david
Keith Alexander®
<returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
>you think my name's richard, and *i'm* dull!?
>david
*** Hey jagoff...
What's it say in your headers?
Surely you ain't crass enough to mean your
nick is "dick," as in "penis" hunter, right?
---
k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
http://www.nootrope.net
http://www.modernamerican.com
aim: nootrope9 .|..
- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
Richard Hunter
<keith@REMOVE!nootrope.net> coughed and sputtered, and managed to
choke out these words:
>On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:47:16 GMT, Richard Hunter
><returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
>
>>you think my name's richard, and *i'm* dull!?
>
>*** Hey jagoff...
>
>What's it say in your headers?
>
>Surely you ain't crass enough to mean your
>nick is "dick," as in "penis" hunter, right?
well, i *am* gay....
Keith Alexander®
<returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
>well, i *am* gay....
*** So that means you "hunt for dick?"
Richard Hunter
>On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:32:45 GMT, Richard Hunter
><returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
>
>>well, i *am* gay....
>
>*** So that means you "hunt for dick?"
as often as possible. :)
ooh, looks like i found one in KA!
david
--
"i'm diggin' on the isotopes, this megaphysics
shit is dope, and if all this can give me hope,
you know i'm satisfied." -madonna, "american life"
x
> well, i *am* gay....
>
I thought you were *bisexual*, fucknugget.
Richard Hunter
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>"Richard Hunter" <returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote in message
>news:u4evvvss9d4tkbfqu...@4ax.com...
>
>> well, i *am* gay....
>>
>
>I thought you were *bisexual*
i identify mostly as homosexual. i've had a few relationships
with women.
btw, you have *way* too much time on your hands if you're trying
to keep up with the details of my life.
x
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:44:07 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm>
> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>
>
> i identify mostly as homosexual. i've had a few relationships
> with women.
>
> btw, you have *way* too much time on your hands if you're trying
> to keep up with the details of my life.
>
Hardly, but pointing out your hypocrisy is fun. There was a time (and, no I
won't google it... but you can if you wish) when you argued with me that you
WEREN'T GAY. Because you were BISEXUAL.
Just because I remember that, and then call you on the post you made in this
thread, does NOT mean I give shit one about "the details of your life".
Keith Alexander®
<returnt...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
>i identify mostly as homosexual.
*** Fucking dabbler.
Eric S.
> No. I'm heterosexual, Eric. Now then. Were you trying to compliment
> me? Or do you use gay as a term of derision? Were you using gay in the
> pejorative? If that's the case then shame on you.
Yes, I was using the word 'gay' as a term of derision. Shame on me?
No. My mom's a dyke therefore I can ridicule the gay without any guilt...I
think it's in the homo bylaws...
-- Eric S.
Richard Hunter
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
<snip>
>Just because I remember that, and then call you on the post you made in this
>thread, does NOT mean I give shit one about "the details of your life".
oooh, more backpedaling.
great.
fr0glet
> "Curt" <curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote...
>> No. I'm heterosexual, Eric. Now then. Were you trying to compliment
>> me? Or do you use gay as a term of derision? Were you using gay in
>> the pejorative? If that's the case then shame on you.
>
> Yes, I was using the word 'gay' as a term of derision. Shame on
> me? No. My mom's a dyke therefore I can ridicule the gay without any
> guilt...I think it's in the homo bylaws...
>
> -- Eric S.
I believe the technical term for Eric's above statement is an "americanism".
fr0glet
--
"You cannot be an objective scientist if you have an agenda."
~The Madman
x
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:50:55 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm>
> coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
>
> <snip>
> >Just because I remember that, and then call you on the post you made in
this
> >thread, does NOT mean I give shit one about "the details of your life".
>
> oooh, more backpedaling.
>
"I do not sink dat word means what you sink it means..."
Correcting your erroneous assumptions about my motives is NOT
back-pedalling, fuckstick.
munkyluvr
"x" <som...@somewhere.cxm> wrote in message
"I do not sink dat word means what you sink it means..."
>
I LOVE THAT MOVIE!!!
x
news:1008b8b...@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm> wrote in message
>
>
> "I do not sink dat word means what you sink it means..."
> >
> I LOVE THAT MOVIE!!!
>
"nor more rhymes now, I mean it!"
"ennebuddy wanna peanut?"
"are there rocks ahead?"
"if dey are, we all be dead!"
I could go on... (and on) but I won't.
munkyluvr
"x" <som...@somewhere.cxm> wrote in message
> "nor more rhymes now, I mean it!"
> "ennebuddy wanna peanut?"
>
> "are there rocks ahead?"
> "if dey are, we all be dead!"
>
> I could go on... (and on) but I won't.
Read the book? Most amusing.
Too bad Andre is dead.
x
And yes, it is too bad.
--
x
"being the smartest window-licker on the shortbus doesn't make you a genius"
By the way, I'm petty and snide.
Dumbass Dentistry -
it's all fun and games until vegetation starts growing in someone's
pulmonary valved conduit.
"munkyluvr" <mymun...@hotmailjustkillme.com> wrote in message
news:1008f1a...@corp.supernews.com...