Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Part 67: Barbara Schwarz reveals shocking news!

2 views
Skip to first unread message

BarbaraSchwarz

unread,
Mar 21, 2003, 1:04:02 PM3/21/03
to
I posted a few months ago that I did hire attorney Bluemel for the
Munich org, but I recall now that I did not. Sorry for the mix up, but
a lot happened to me since that time. I recall now in detail our
visist in Bluemels offfice in the early 80s, and I remember that
Ginger Smith, Allan Hubbart, and I, agreed to not hire Bluemel.

After that decision, Larry Forsgren came to Munich and assisted me to
get new lawyers for the Church of Scientology Germany. Larry and
another RTC missionaire
visited numerous Munich law firms and recommended the one of
Wunderlich and Deinlein.

(Larry, if you should read this, please note that I don't blame you
for how Wunderlich and Deinlein worked out. I know you did your best,
and as far as the references and the reputation of those attorneys
were concerned, you could have not found a better law firm. It is not
your fault that the attorneys sold Scientology and me out. Any other
German law firm would have done that too. It is a very rotten world.)

Somebody else hired Bluemel after I was kicked out. Thanks heaven I
did not hire him. All the years I lived with guilt of having hired
that Bavarian snake and slime ball, but I haven't! I wrongfully
remembered that Bluemel replaced shyster W. Ehlers and stayed on some
cases that Wunderlich and Deinlein did not take, but I recall now that
Wunderlich and Deinlein got all our cases from Ehlers, and Bluemel got
nothing.

How could I have forgotten? (Must have been channelled to me by the
mindcontrollers in my subconcious mind to make me feel guilty.) All
the years I was asking myself what I was thinking having hired that
psychiatric agent, but now I am very relieved. I didn't.

Rosemarie (RB) mailed me a copy of a letter by Josef Beneken, in
Essen, of October 7, 1985, regards me, Barbara Schwarz,
Geschaeftsnummer: OWI 338 Js 11535/84 to a Dr. Hill from political
party CSU, saying that I was "conditioned" by Scientology. - Beneken
did not know me. He saw me once briefly, and I did not talk to him. He
had no right to claim anything about me to others and certainly had no
expertise or first hand knowledge concerning me and my life. He also
had authoritzation to speak on my behalf. I also don't know who Dr.
Hill is.

What is "conditioning" in anyway? Is that not the cream stuff that
people do on their hair to make it more manageable? What is Beneken
suggesting? That I was forced by Scientology what to think? I studied
Scientology, but nobody told me what to believe. If that is
conditioning, nobody can read and study anything, because that would
be conditioning too.

Anybody can ask those that indeed knew me and worked together with me.
They will tell you that I always did what I wanted. I did not follow
orders that were not build on common sense, and most of the time
nobody ordered me anything.

My senior in the Munich Div. 6 was Albrecht Vorherr. He was the
Director of Clearing. Ali was much more an artist than somebody who
ordered or would "condition". We spoke often about art, history and
science, and he never made me feel being a junior.

I posted before that Kurt Weiland was my senior in the Public Relation
Office, and he rarely told me what to do, he just let me decide what I
thought was the right thing to do. Kurt knew my style and did not feel
threatened by it, but wog and criminal infiltrators George Stoffel and
Juerg Stettler did.

Our jobs were written up in "hat write ups", and that was the
definition of the jobs, and that was what I was operating on. I worked
often closely with Rudolf Moyses and Konstantin Milencovic in the
Munich Guardian Office Public Relations Office. They too were people
that were interested in religion, science and history and did not
control others.

When I became the President, I was the boss. So, who conditioned me?
If somebody did suggest that the study of Scientology religious
material would "condition" or "brainwash" than note that I studied a
L. Ron Hubbard citation that says that true is only what the person
herself discovered as truth and not what others say would be the
truth. Actually, this statement hung on several walls in the Munich
org. - And that is what I did. I looked at everything if it makes
sense and if it can be true. That is also when I discovered that
Scientology is infiltrated and Rons writings are altered to make less
sense and to be more non-religious. If I would have been
"conditioned", I never would have found that out

In other words, Beneken was lying to Dr. Hill, and who is Dr. Hill
anyway?

RB also mailed me a copy of a letter from Beneken to the Minister fuer
Arbeit, Gesundheit and Soziales, (Health Minister), and to Ingo
Heinemann, in Duesseldorf. The letter is dated January 9, 1987.
Beneken complains in this letter about Ralph Mucha, another
Scientology attacker, that Mucha would have evil intentions, that
Ministerialrat Lieber would ignore that fact and that Herr Reinecke of
Ministry for Family in Bonn said that people have to count with
revelation of family details if they have contact with Mucha. In other
words, Beneken was saying that Mucha isn't one who considers other
people's privacy protected. (Interesting, but what has this to do with
me, and why is it in my files? But I sure knew that Mucha is a crook,
that is nothing new to me.)

More to come in the next installment.

Barbara Schwarz,
March 21, 2003

0 new messages