Part 4: Barbara Schwarz about Barbara Schwarz litigation against the infiltrated U.S. government
BarbaraSchwarz
was filed in February 2000 and is in nature much as my claims in my
case versus Dept. of Energy. Case vs. GOA, no. 00-369 and other
federal agencies had only 24 defendants and judge Kennedy grabbed also
this case to deny my rights. In this case however, defendants filed
affidavits, which proved once more that they are no agencies of good
faith, that they conducted either no searches or no adequate searches.
The declarations had similar faults as the 79 affidavits filed in case
98-2406. I filed affidavits in return and supported them with
evidence, which most agencies did not do or didn't do enough. From the
evidence that I attached, mostly my correspondence with the agencies
and their replies and internal records, the court could see that the
agencies had violated FOIA/PA statutes and conducted no lawful
searches or none at all, that they covered up existing records before
me and that they denied my FOIA/PA and other rights.
Once more, judge Henry H. Kennedy, but also the appeal court judges
had the proof of faul play by the agencies right before them. The
judges let the defendants off the hook by kicking the case out without
ordering the defendants to explain the contradictory evidence to the
content of their affidavits.
It is also difficult to explain why defendants filed affidavits in
cases 98-2406, 00-369, but not on 99-3234, 00-1610 and 01-1464. Those
cases contained valid claims to different illegal actions by federal
agencies, but they were all about that agencies denied illegally
FOIA/PA records to me or made no adequate searches. The judges did not
even apply equal justice to my cases, they rather ruled how they were
in the mood that day.
I had received a lot more illegal determinations by agencies with
clear evidence that they covered my own records up before me, with
more proof that they don't respect FOIA/PA statutes nor my
constitutional rights. The agencies themselves in most cases referred
me to court in case I wanted any review, knowing that my cases would
be given to co-conspirator judges, that would cover up any illegal
action by them.
I filed my case vs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS), case no. 00-1610, that had 189 pages and 465 federal
defendants. That case continued where case 99-3234 had ended, because
despite that I filed lawsuits, the defendants did not see why they
should grand any rights to me. The case was mainly based on the same
kind but new actions by the defendants as described in details in part
two and three of this series.
Judge Kennedy got once more the chance to review that the federal
employees indeed very obviciously conspired against me and concealed
records illegally before me. My complaint in case 00-1610, supported
by an affidavit, proved even more that the federal employees were
corrupt and were liars. Judge Kennedy criticized me (!) that I would
find too many faults with the defendants, instead of correcting the
criminal defendants, and he also threw case 00-1610 out, without
asking the defendants to carry the burden of proof that they indeed
conducted any or adequate searches and without that they had to file
the mandatory affidavits as required by law in FOIA cases. Kennedy is
a partner in crime of the defendants, he is a biased judge who doesn't
know that the word impartial means. (Just as his boss the chief judge
Hogan doesn't know the different between a Department and a Depot.)
In October 2000, I mailed my 148 pages long complaint vs. the FBI, CIA
and some Army offices and agencies to the Columbia District Court.
This is case number 00-2758 and has 70 defendants. By October 2000,
many FBI field offices had either replied to or illegally ignored my
FOIA/PA requests for records to my former FOIA/PA requests, appeals
and litigation. Besides the FBI HQ, 45 FBI field offices are
defendants in this case. I sued them because from the records that
they mailed me, it is very evident that they conspiratively did not
search in all records systems in which I asked them to search. I
requested search in 18 field offices records systems, and 10 HQ
records systems, and they just searched in average 2-3 records systems
on field office levels, and withheld their computer printouts to the
searches completely and illegally.
They wrote me very unspecific determinations, which read as if written
by same corrupt person for all of them and those determinations
indicated that faul play was involved. The FBI HQ and the FBI field
offices, but also the CIA did not search for any inquiries or
subpoenas from Mark Rathbun's (de Rothschild's) attorneys or from an
Independent Counsel requesting my records from those agencies. They
also conspiratively did not provide me with any information on Marty
or his family, despite that they knew he was wrongfully incarcerated,
that I am his wife and relief witness. They deliberately failed to
apply privacy exemptions to the case, but knew that Mark is target of
a conspiracy, was framed, is wrongfully incarcerated, could lose his
life behind bars and needs my testimony. They also illegally concealed
public information to Marty or his family to me. For example, the
place of incarceration of a prisoner is public information, and that
is actually all I needed to find him and to arrange my testimony in
the proper legal forum that has jurisdiction.
Many FBI field offices lied that they would have no records to L. Ron
Hubbard, despite that they have access to the same central records
systems as all other FBI field offices and the HQ, others acknowledged
having some, but most did not mail them to me, but rather to the FBI
HQ. They conspired to deny to me my right of 100 free pages records
from each field office and that I would be not able to pay them if
they don't send them to me, but to the FBI HQ. Indeed, the FBI HQ
wrote that I shall pay for approx. 700 pages records and they used my
impecuniosity to deny the records to me with that criminal trick.
FBI field office executives, the Special Agent in Charge or the Chief
Division Counsel sometimes allowed their secretaries to forge their
signatures on their letters to me, so that they don't have to sign the
lawless determinations themselves.
Case 00-2758 was first assigned to judge Kennedy, then he considered
that it would be convenient to have another judge at his court that
also bluntly denies my rights as he did. He selected his buddy judge
John Bates for that.
Bates threw the case out and just as Kenendy violated FOIA/PA statutes
and laws that demand fromt he agencies to prove their searches and to
file mandatory affidavits. Bates just like Kennedy knew that
declarations filed by the FBI, CIA or Army would bring defendants in
troubles that conspiratively already perjured themselves before other
forums of law, in Marty's case or before a grand jury, the Independent
Counsel or U.S. Congress. They lied not to know me, or my requests, or
appeals, or litigation, just as the German still existing Nazi secret
service ordered them to do, to cover their criminal actions against
Marty and the United States up.
Barbara Schwarz,
January 10, 2003
Read in installment no. 5, the continuation.