Part 3: Barbara Schwarz about Barbara Schwarz litigation against the infiltrated U.S. government
BarbaraSchwarz
mailed me some of my FOIA/PA records, some of my records pertaining to
my law suit 98-2406, but they overwhellmingly withheld records
illegally, by claiming I would be not entitled to a copy of my own
records, or they lied directly in my face saying that they would have
no records to my former FOIA/PA requests or my litigation.
They claimed before that they searched to my first FOIA/PA requests,
which means that they must have internal processing documents and
records that they generated during the first searches. An agency has
to generate a papertrail to FOIA/PA requests and keep them for years,
esp. when the request turned into litigation much longer.
The federal employees either lied in case 98-2406 having searched to
my first requests, or they lied later, saying they have no records to
my first requests. Clear is only that lied, one way or the other, but
rather in both cases.
Several agencies mailed me some internal records and I could convince
myself that they did everything they could to not conduct adequate,
lawful and good faith searches, e.g. they did not search for the
proper spelling of the names I provided, they twisted the names, they
ignored subjects that they should search completely and they
conspiratively tried to ignore searches for records pertaining to L.
Ron Hubbard or former U.S. President Dwight David Eisenhower.
The documents revealed that they searched to wrong time periods,
searched in wrong records systems, or not in all records systems in
which I wanted to have a search, or they claimed deliberately
wrongfully that my requests would be not specific enough, that they
can't conduct any search if I would not name the exact documents that
I want. (They asked me to know their records better than they knew
them.)
The federal employees withheld many details as to the searches,
prevented a search in offices and records systems that most likely
contained the records that I wanted, they withheld also often their
own administrative case numbers and appeal numbers on my own cases
before me. They conspiratively denied to me search
certificates/declarations as to how search was conducted and by who.
Nobody wanted to sign those, because they knew that no lawful searches
were conducted and records illegally concealed before me.
They often did not inform me on any administrative appeal rights, they
withheld records under FOIA/PA exemptions that did not apply to my
case, they often did not inform how little time they spent searching,
to cover up that they cheated me out of my two hours free search time.
They often just searched a few minutes to satisfy their own curiosity,
but did not search to provide me with my reciords. Some asked me to
pay for search and copies without granting me my two hours free search
time and my 100 pages free records. (See U.S. Code, Title 5, page 552
and 552a.)
Many of the agencies that mailed me records avoided to list the amount
of pages that they mailed me to cover up that they mailed me only a
few of their many records pertaining to my requests and the documents
that they attached indicated also that they had much more than they
mailed to me. Despite that the evidence was clear that records were
illegally withheld, they claimed that I got all they have.
They did not provide me with a Vaughn Index as to the documents they
withheld and often did not mention how many pages they allegedly
legally withheld. Instead of cutting certain text out of documents,
they most of the time withheld a series of documents, claiming they
would be too sensitive for me to read. Remember, FOIA/PA is an open
process, it's purpose is to reveal. Nothing should have been redacted
from the documents and the documents should have been mailed to me in
their entirety. The only reason why the docs were withheld is, because
they show illegal and discriminating activities by the federal
employees conspiring against me but also Mark Rathbun (de Rothschild),
his attorneys and an Independent Counsel investigating the
infiltration of the U.S. government.
I decided to file another civil case to the U.S. District Court of
Columbia, (which is the leading court in FOIA/PA litigation), against
the Department of Energy, et.al., case no. 99-3234, that had 807
defendants, federal employees to which I had evidence that they denied
my rights for adequate FOIA/PA processing and records and other
rights.
The complaint had 179 pages and was a short document compared to the
amount of defendants. I did not only cite the agencies as defendants,
but also the employees, because I had the evidence that those
employees indeed conspired against me and my rights. I asked the judge
to investigate this conspiracy.
Case 99-3234 consisted of claims relating to two different kind of
FOIA/PA requests sent my be to the U.S. Departments, their components
or U.S. agencies: One asked for internal records that the agencies had
to my former FOIA/PA requests, appeals and litigation, the other one
was a FOIA/PA request mailed to those agencies and department
components that sofar had not received any FOIA/PA requests from me. I
asked those for records pertaining to myself, Mark C. Rathbun (de
Rothschild), L. Ron Hubbard, and President Eisenhower.
Case 99-3234 was assigned also to judge Henry H. Kennedy, who had the
perfect opportunity to review that at least 78 of the affidavits filed
by the defendants in case 98-2406 were none of good faith, because
case 99-3234 started were case 98-2406 had ended.
This corrupt judge denied my rights for access to the courts and any
relief as to government corruption, despite the had the clear evidence
on his desk hereto. He dismissed my case and decided that no agency
has to file any declaration that they indeed searched, despite that
the law says that the government has the burden to prove that they
indeed conducted the seaches.
I figured out why Kennedy did not order the defendants to file the
affidavits that are required by the law to be filed: He knew that Mark
Rathbun's attorneys and an Independent Counsel subpoenaed my records
from the agencies and they withheld those records to cover for the
German government that declared Barbara Schwarz dead, so that I can't
testify for Marty and can't prove his innocence and that the
Independent Counsel and his grand jury can't summon me as witness as
to secret U.S. governmental infiltration neither. Federal employees
must have conspiratively lied under oath to Marty's attorneys, an
Independent Counsel, a grad jury not knowing of me, not having any
records on me, to obstuct justice, to be in contempt of Congress and
to conceal the illegal infiltration of the U.S. government.
If judge Kennedy would have done, what he should have done under the
law, to order the agencies to file affidavits to their alleged
searches and activities, the federal employees would have committed
perjury and lied again in their affidavits in my cases that they did
not withheld records to which I am entitled, and Marty's attorneys and
the Independent Counsel would have received more evidence of
governmental corruption for their cases. That's why lawless judge
Kennedy and the appeal court gave them a hand. He considered that
kicking out my cases would save the defendants, the federal gang.
Barbara Schwarz
January 9, 2003
For more information read also sequel number 4.
My name is Legion
(BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:
>Barbara Schwarz
For the REAL facts go http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/foia/vfa0641.htm
and read what she didn't do.
BarbaraSchwarz
Anonymous coward, the DOE made my "failures" up. They are lies. For
what really happened, study my FOIA/PA requests, my administrative
appeals, my civil cases and the affidavits provided.
Barbara Schwarz