PLEASE KILL MY SON
MRS. BRADBURY
with a baseball bat
Scott Bradbury
13 N. Mechanic St.
Bellville TX 77418
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
[ Via MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com> ]
Fragano Ledgister
>
>with a baseball bat
>Scott Bradbury
There is no difference between Scott Bradbury and the perpetrator of this
offence.
Fragano Ledgister
(Fled...@aol.com)
I had no nation now but the imagination.
(Derek Walcott)
Blakely
that.
Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
lie.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Doc Tavish
Path: news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!
news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w!spln!extra.newsguy.com!
newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Xref: news.flash.net alt.revisionism:674696
On Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT), MRS. BRADBURY
<00...@mailanon.com> wrote:
with a baseball bat
Scott Bradbury
(Address and telephone number deleted by Scott Bradbury aka Doc
Tavish. BTW did you notice that you have left tell tale traces with this
posting? Looks like your anonymous server didn't do a good job stripping
all the headers! Yes the message ID and the point of origin are still
intact! FYI my address won't be what you posted much longer-- I expect a
very substantial punitive damage settlement soon that will go a long ways
towards my relocation and having a nice retirement home built. BTW the
telephone number will be changing soon too!)
Doc Tavish
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>that.
>
>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>lie.
More important just look at what the person making the death threat anon
server left intact:
Path:
news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w!spln!
extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent off to
NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation by law
enforcement!
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
On 14-May-2000, Blakely <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> that.
>
> Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
> lie.
I was at a Chinese restaurant the other day and my fortune cookie
said: "You should expect a sudden gift of money."
Doc Tavish
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 14
May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
wrote:
>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>that.
>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>>lie.
>More important just look at what the person making the death threat
>anon server left intact:
>Path:
>news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w
>!spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
>From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
>Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
>Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
>Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
>Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent off
>to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation by law
>enforcement!
I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
of his victims actually does something to stop him.
I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with the
attention.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOR89BDfbIykA6SysEQIfbQCg6i+EcsPmhXnCjsJU7HpjZO039joAoIOr
v52eYaXRTa9d2I1RfL+Vz8lb
=hDe1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Karl McCarron
Maddison" <madd...@power.connexus.net.au> wrote:
> MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com> wrote:
> : with a baseball bat
> : Scott Bradbury
> There is NO difference between you and them.
> David Maddison
> Fragano Ledgister wrote:
> Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
> with a baseball bat
> Scott Bradbury
> [address and phone number deleted]
> There is no difference between Scott Bradbury and the
> perpetrator of this offence.
Seems like the Nizkooks like these kind of posts 'cause it
gives them a chance to jump in and insult their opponents.
Karl
* Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find related Web Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping. Smart is Beautiful
Sara Salzman
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>that.
>
Threat? Where is the threat?
What I see is a forging of Scott Bradbury's mother.
Not different from the forgery of my name. Or my daughter's name. Or a
bogus "I fired Sara Salzman" post.
Please explain this so-called "threat," and then tell us how it is
different frm anything Don Ellis posted about me.
Oh, and by the way, just in case you missed them, here ARE some of the
direct threats Scott Bradbury HAS made:
On 04/16/1997:
"I do believe that Bruno would derive great pleasure in applying his craft
to Mr. Keren. Yes Bruno is from the old Bavarian School of inquisitive
acquisition. Bruno knows how to stimulate every nerve but yet not do any
sort of damage. Yes Bruno would spend hours in a cold dark damp
dungeon with him. Bruno is a firm believer in the old adage: "No pain, no
gain." :-) Mr. Keren will probably over react to Bruno BUT Bruno went back
home to Bavaria a while back because certain ones in this ng hurt his
feelings! He is a big dumb brute in the common sort of way but he's such a
likable lug too! I may be able to persuade him to come back but I don't
know. If I can get Bruno back then may be Gunther and Gerhardt may return
too!
They all claim that life is too hard for them in America with all of this
hatred by Nizkooks running around. They say it reminds them of when the
Communists ruled and how the Commies kept files on everyone. Reminds me of
what commie East Germany used to be!"
http://x5.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=349684809
Subject: Two Death Threats to Tavish for Today - Off to the
FBI These
Shall Go!
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Dr. Morbius Tavish)
Date: 1998/05/02
Message-ID: <354b9506...@news.tavish-central.net>
[...]
I just wish these dumb asses would realize that they can't get
away with this. I'll send a copy to tavish-central, a copy to the Houston
Branch of
the FBI and a copy to the nut cake's ISP. Now people can understand why I
positively abhor the majority of Kikes I encounter. Bruno at the moment is
muttering about how nice it would be if he would be allowed to interrogate
this person. I agree that Bruno should be able to apply his talents. I
could picture Bruno being slow and very methodical too! :-)
**************
Mr. Van Alstine is a saboteur of Nizkor and that is all we need
to bring hin in for an especially vigorous interrogation! He will not be
so cocky after Bruno works with him. Don't worry Bruno has never killed
anyone yet and he is a master at his craft. Bruno could rightfully be
called a master of pain for he knows how to work every nerve and fiber to
achieve the results desired with the very least amount of tissue damage.
The man is devoted to his work as a true artisan!
***************
Why don't you identify yourself then? Bruno has already picked
the lash he will use in my interrogation of you. He at first opted for his
short fat bull whip. This whip does not cut the flesh but it makes
extremely painful throbbing welts that only diminish in pain over a few
days. He has chosen his custom stage coach style whip that is nearly
twenty feet long. Each stroke is just like a hot knife hitting butter.
This whip on each stroke cuts beyond the subcutaneous epidermal layers.
He'll literally peel you like an onion. Each stroke of this lash will feel
just like having a white hot wire streak across your back and buttocks.
Bruno is an artisan at his craft and he most eagerly awaits hoisting you
up in manacles to administer the "truth serum." I will relish watching you
flop around like a fish. Pleasant dreams!
Herr Doktor Tavische
*******************
I'd say that the above is explicit evidence of libel and
slander. I surely wish Mr. Richard Phillips et al immediately files suit,
has subpoenas herewith issued. I will be glad to attend the trial and I
hope that a good public flogging is part of the reparations Yale has to
receive in lieu of
monetary damages he will have to render.
BTW Richard- Bruno has volunteered to administer the flogging if is
permissable by the court. He has been practicing a lot lately. Perhaps he
senses something in the air. I hate saying it but he is somewhat bestial
or animalistic in his instincts but he is loyal to me to the end.
cc: Mr. Richard Phillips
******************
Herr Rosenberg so very nice of you to slither out and play tonight!
We all see that you have not for once changed your tone yes? You will
change your tone very soon! They all do; believe me they all do! We have a
nice damp dungeon all prepared for you in Berlin. We will talk at great
length and get to the very root of your attitude yes? I personally will
not let Bruno interrogate you too long no!
************
Yeah SOG just keep your mouth running while you can. You'll be
squealing like stuck pig when we shove the
rotisserie skewer where the sun don't shine on April 20th! You'll cook
quite well over an open fire! You'll probably give us all gas BUT that is
why we'll have plenty of Tagment on hand. Burp!
TAVISH :->
Bruno says that he knows how to tenderize you too. I think he wants to use
his 20 foot whip! Ouch!
**********************
I can only say that Bruno knows that this happened and right now he is
outside practicing with his whip. Her looks mighty g-d damned furious in
the hot Texas sun cracking that whip. Damn it sounds like a 30' 06 going
off each time he pops that thing. I'd hate to "Count 25" for him! Yes,
indeedy!! :-)
Doc Tavish Singing "Our Day Will Come!"
***************
Date: 03/09/1997
Author: Billy Dale McTavish
<tav...@phoenix.net>
You are cowards and sneaks that E-Mail Bomb.
You hit me Feb 21, Mar 7, and twice today!
You only make it very easy to despise you!
Have fun because I am getting a new E-mail account tomorrow and it will not be
published.
Vengeance is sweet and I know that the day will come when I'll get to
see
the sneak that did this to me get a thorough interrogation from Bruno! I
will love standing there watching him peel your skin off layer by layer
with his lash and ever so methodically. Your screams of pain will fall on
deaf ears. I will take extreme delight in watching the foam come spewing
out of your vile mouth as Bruno gives you another! Do not worry for I will
not let him kill you. You must heal up and become well- so the process can
start right back over again to be repeated again and again. You will see
no end to your pain! I solemnly promise the day will come when the tables
will turn. Destiny will place you at my feet and you will pray for death
and it will by no means come.
Tavish
>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>lie.
Hmm... looks like the liar here is... YOU!
Sara
--
"I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
Edith Sitwell
Blakely
can you prove that Don Ellis threatened your family? Something
tells me you can't.
In article <catamont-140...@ts003d13.den-
co.concentric.net>, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>In article <07716536...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>,
Blakely
><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>that.
>>
>
>Threat? Where is the threat?
>
>What I see is a forging of Scott Bradbury's mother.
>
>Not different from the forgery of my name. Or my daughter's
name. Or a
>bogus "I fired Sara Salzman" post.
>
>Please explain this so-called "threat," and then tell us how it
is
>different frm anything Don Ellis posted about me.
>
>Oh, and by the way, just in case you missed them, here ARE some
of the
>direct threats Scott Bradbury HAS made:
Sara Salzman
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>On Sun, 14 May 2000 23:55:17 GMT, John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
>wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 14
>>May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
>>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>>>that.
>>
>>>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>>>>lie.
>
>>>More important just look at what the person making the death threat
>>>anon server left intact:
>>
>>>Path:
>>>news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w
>>>!spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
>>>From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
>>>Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
>>>Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
>>>Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
>>>Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
>>>NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>>
>>>The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent off
>>>to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation by law
>>>enforcement!
>
>>I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
>>of his victims actually does something to stop him.
>>
>>I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with the
>>attention.
>
>Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me. Imagine
>having death threat telephone calls and four of them successfully call
>traced and being acted upon, imagine having your telephone ring all hours
>of the day and night and the person hanging up when you've answered,
>imagine having your unlisted address and unlisted telephone number posted
>numerous times with definite (beyond any doubt) death threats and then
>you'll know. Imagine having an incurable medical disorder which prevents
>you from going to work or being able to drive and it affecting your blood
>pressure and being harassed criminally night and day and having the person
>responsible lauging about it!
>
>I.E.
>
>http://x27.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=608003427
>Subject: Re: Doc Tavish To Take Some Time Off
>Date: 04/07/2000
>Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
>
>I had said:
>> Blood pressure 172/110
>> Took one Lotrel, ten asprins and two "hits" of nitro-glycerin today!
>
> And did you make out the certified check ordered by the Court?
>
>Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, ...
>
> ~~~End of DejaCom Excerpt~~~
>
>Your pal is going to explain his motive for further posting where I live
>in court soon John! He's done the above over 100 times!
>
>How about this John?
>
>http://x27.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=612415320
>Subject: Re: MUST READ! for those who wish to see Bradbury lie again.
>Date: 04/17/2000
>Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
>
>> >> > Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas...
>
>> >> Soon you will be able to explain to federal authorities why you
>> >> continually post where I live!
>
>> > To distinguish you from all other Scott VBradburys in the world.
>
>> You're drooling again. Can't even type can you psycho?
>
> Watch that blood pressure Defendant Bradbury
>
> ~~~End of DejaCom Archives~~~
>
>How convincing will the testimony of three different doctors will be that
>what your pal has put me through has been injurious to my health? Also
>take note how cute he thinks he is by mentioning my blood pressure!
>
>In the same post archived above these words were exchanged:
>
>> >> As for me lying Flash Net has confirmed that YOU and only YOU obtained
>> >> my customer information which you then distributed to your criminal
>> >> co-conspirators. This proves you as being an accessory to federal
>> >> crimes beyond any doubt Yale!
>
>> > This proves you are a lying fuck as no federal crimes have been
>> >committed.
>
>((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
>made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
>was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
>
>Justice is going to be served soon and all of the harassment against me
>will stop.
>
>As for my my address and telephone number being posted-- in a short time
>they will change with an expected settlement I expect to have coming my
>way. It is only proper to make the unremorseful person responsible for his
>criminally distributing confidential information obtained using a subpoena
>to be used criminally.
>
>Don't you think it's only proper that a certain person who abused the
>legal system only be made to help me relocate seeing how it was his very
>own irresponsible act that has endangered me in the first place?
>
>BTW why haven't I heard any of your fellow clowns making their remarks
>about "bench warraants" or if the "certified check is in the mail" lately?
Yes... how ABOUT that check? Since you're expecting a "settlement" soon,
you should have no problem.
Sara Salzman
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>I thought you did not talk about Don Ellis. You lied again. And
>can you prove that Don Ellis threatened your family? Something
>tells me you can't.
>
>
I never said he threatened my family, Liar.
And here's what you snipped, Liar. Scott Bradbury's threats:
On 04/16/1997:
[...]
Herr Doktor Tavische
*******************
cc: Mr. Richard Phillips
******************
************
TAVISH :->
**********************
Tavish
Sara
>
>In article <catamont-140...@ts003d13.den-
>co.concentric.net>, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>>In article <07716536...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>,
>Blakely
>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>>that.
>>>
>>
>>Threat? Where is the threat?
>>
>>What I see is a forging of Scott Bradbury's mother.
>>
>>Not different from the forgery of my name. Or my daughter's
>name. Or a
>>bogus "I fired Sara Salzman" post.
>>
>>Please explain this so-called "threat," and then tell us how it
>is
>>different frm anything Don Ellis posted about me.
>>
>>Oh, and by the way, just in case you missed them, here ARE some
>of the
>>direct threats Scott Bradbury HAS made:
>
>
>* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
>The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
--
Blakely
squirm Doc.
Blakely
type this
/join #revisionist
Nazihunter just said he was going to post directions to your
house. Come in.
Jeffrey G. Brown
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>that.
Bullshit. Sara Salzman documented many such threats from Poor Ol' Gutless
Scottie. Some highlights:
"reach out and touch," "peel your skin off layer by layer," "You will see
no end to your pain," "peel you like an onion," "hoisting you up in
manacles," "you will pray for death," etc.
**************
On 04/16/1997:
[...]
Herr Doktor Tavische
*******************
cc: Mr. Richard Phillips
******************
************
TAVISH :->
**********************
**********************
Just because you are a bigot does not give you the right to lie, little worm.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Jeffrey G. Brown
Scottie "beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>I was at a Chinese restaurant the other day and my fortune cookie
>said: "You should expect a sudden gift of money."
You must have gotten Yale's cookie by mistake, Cockroach Boy.
Check. Certified.
Blakely
that gives the Nizkorphiles a chance to lie big time now.
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me.
Of course, that rule only applies to other folks. Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
will judge anybody he wishes. If he can't find a reason to condemn
someone, he'll happily forge an email to supply one.
>Imagine
>having death threat telephone calls and four of them successfully call
>traced and being acted upon, imagine having your telephone ring all hours
>of the day and night and the person hanging up when you've answered,
>imagine having your unlisted address and unlisted telephone number posted
>numerous times with definite (beyond any doubt) death threats and then
>you'll know. Imagine having an incurable medical disorder which prevents
>you from going to work or being able to drive and it affecting your blood
>pressure and being harassed criminally night and day and having the person
>responsible lauging about it!
Imagine being a lying, libelling coward who will do anything -- even post
a fake announcement of your own "death" -- to avoid being held responsible
for your actions. Imagine being caught posting pornography and claiming
that the photos are of 'Israeli atrocities'. Imagine making up dozens of
sock puppets in a vain attempt to deceive yourself that somebody else --
ANYBODY else -- believes your year-in, year-out stream of utter bullshit.
Ye gods, what am I saying? You don't have to imagine any of that, do you,
O Gutless One?
You _are_ that sad, deluded little cockroach.
JGB
P.S. _Everybody_ laughs at you, Scottie.
Blakely
just call her the gossip queen of usenet, that is a very
accurate portrayal of what she really is. No facts, only gossip
and name calling, just like little children and old women.
Blakely
If you do contact the RCMP and they do an investigation, I will
gladly help in anyway possible to get this person put behind
bars.
Don't expect any help from the Nizkorphiles, because we know
what they think about this.
Blakely
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
>death threat posts like Nazihunter has done!
On 04/16/1997:
[...]
Herr Doktor Tavische
*******************
cc: Mr. Richard Phillips
******************
************
TAVISH :->
**********************
**********************
JGB
Blakely
could easily of been fakes. I see many postings about you
molesting boys but you dismiss them as fakes.
Prove Bradbury actually posted the stuff.
David S. Maddison
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 14
>May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>>that.
>
>>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>>>lie.
>>More important just look at what the person making the death threat
>>anon server left intact:
>
>>Path:
>>news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w
>>!spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
>>From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
>>Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
>>Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
>>Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
>>Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>
>>The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent off
>>to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation by law
>>enforcement!
>I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
>of his victims actually does something to stop him.
>
>I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with the
>attention.
Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me. Imagine
having death threat telephone calls and four of them successfully call
traced and being acted upon, imagine having your telephone ring all hours
of the day and night and the person hanging up when you've answered,
imagine having your unlisted address and unlisted telephone number posted
numerous times with definite (beyond any doubt) death threats and then
you'll know. Imagine having an incurable medical disorder which prevents
you from going to work or being able to drive and it affecting your blood
pressure and being harassed criminally night and day and having the person
responsible lauging about it!
I.E.
~~~End of DejaCom Excerpt~~~
How about this John?
~~~End of DejaCom Archives~~~
As for your comment: "I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation
that comes with the attention." YES I am enjoying rubbing all of my former
taunters noses in all the shit they've dumped around like dogs. If a dog
shits on the floor his nose should be rubbed in it and I liken many of
your fellows to being worthless dogs that shit on the floor.
Doc Tavish
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <391f47bb...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Mon, 15
May 2000 01:10:37 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
wrote:
>On Sun, 14 May 2000 23:55:17 GMT, John Morris
><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>>0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun,
>>14 May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
>>wrote:
>>>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
>>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>>>that.
>>>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>>>>lie.
>>>More important just look at what the person making the death
>>>threat anon server left intact:
>>>Path:
>>>news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln
>>>-w !spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
>>>From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
>>>Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
>>>Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
>>>Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
>>>Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
>>>NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>>>The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent
>>>off to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation
>>>by law enforcement!
>>I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
>>of his victims actually does something to stop him.
>>I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with
>>the attention.
>Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me.
>Imagine having death threat telephone calls and four of them
>successfully call traced and being acted upon, imagine having your
>telephone ring all hours of the day and night and the person hanging
>up when you've answered, imagine having your unlisted address and
>unlisted telephone number posted numerous times with definite
>(beyond any doubt) death threats and then you'll know. Imagine
>having an incurable medical disorder which prevents you from going
>to work or being able to drive and it affecting your blood pressure
>and being harassed criminally night and day and having the person
>responsible lauging about it!
Please contact me by private e-mail when the police are ready to
contact me.
[snip]
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOR9PsDfbIykA6SysEQJk6ACgq74fwYqk6MU01RZKrLxFlmUnGBQAn2gz
NPzwFPBvSsViSL+5RrzMLVP2
=127t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Fragano Ledgister
>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>that.
No there isn't.
>
>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>lie.
Who's lying? You need to head off to a tea room and get your tension down.
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 14
>May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>>that.
>
>>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>>>lie.
>>More important just look at what the person making the death threat
responsible laughing about it!
I.E.
~~~End of DejaCom Excerpt~~~
How about this John?
~~~End of DejaCom Archives~~~
How convincing will the testimony of three different doctors be that what
Doc Tavish
>- --
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>that.
>No there isn't.
You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
death threat posts like Nazihunter has done! Justify your libel you've
made below!
On 14 May 2000 22:45:14 GMT, fled...@aol.comkillspam (Fragano Ledgister)
<20000514184514...@ng-ff1.aol.com> wrote:
Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
>>with a baseball bat
>>Scott Bradbury
>[address and phone number deleted]
>There is no difference between Scott Bradbury and the perpetrator of this
>offence.
>
>Fragano Ledgister
>(Fled...@aol.com)
>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>>lie.
>Who's lying?
You are. Show the post complete with a DejaCom URL where I have done such.
Show where I have posted a person's address and invited others to "visit"
them with baseball bats or to kill someone.
>You need to head off to a tea room and get your tension down.
You need to control your big mouth and guard the accusations you make.
Doc Tavish
>Fragano Ledgister
Doc Tavish
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Nazihunter is in the chat room right now, go listen to him
>squirm Doc.
I have the Dalnet page called up but how do I get to #revisionism?
Gord McFee
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
> You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
> death threat posts like Nazihunter has done! Justify your libel you've
> made below!
Sure Doc. Remember this?
<quote>
Path: news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net!not-for-mail
From: gmc...@ibm.net (Gord McFee)
Newsgroups:
alt.revisionism,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.fan.g-gordon-liddy
Subject: Re: Giwer more or less admits that he is a drunk...
Date: 19 Dec 1996 20:43:39 GMT
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <59c9dr$uv2$3...@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net>
References: <gandhi-ya0231800...@news.bctel.ca>
<19961212201...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
<32b068d5...@news.winternet.com>
<58rp8o$jo0$1...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <32B1CD...@nbnet.nb.ca>
<58veji$22f$2...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <joelr.62...@winternet.com>
<32B3FF...@nbnet.nb.ca> <5954rg$73$2...@uhura.phoenix.net>
<32B722...@nbnet.nb.ca><gandhi-ya0231800...@news.bctel.ca>
<19961212201...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
<32b068d5...@news.winternet.com>
<58rp8o$jo0$1...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <32B1CD...@nbnet.nb.ca>
<58veji$22f$2...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <joelr.62...@winternet.com>
<32B3FF...@nbnet.nb.ca> <5954rg$73$2...@uhura.phoenix.net>
<32B722...@nbnet.nb.ca> <59altg$ov2$3...@uhura.phoenix.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip129-37-167-108.pq.ca.ibm.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: NeoLogic News for OS/2 [version: 4.5d]
Xref: news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net alt.revisionism:116316
alt.conspiracy:200378 alt.politics.nationalism.white:58581
alt.politics.white-power:78703 alt.fan.g-gordon-liddy:59136
In message <59altg$ov2$3...@uhura.phoenix.net> - Doc Tavish
<"tav...@phoenix.net"@phoenix.net>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 23:59:27 -0600
writes:
:>
:>Keith Morrison wrote:
:>>
:>> Doc Tavish wrote:
:>>
:>> > Joel I will pay Keith's first class airfare too. You may need a geek as
:>> > a side act for your show. Keith are you up to biting off the heads of
:>> > snakes? Got to go and polish my jackboots- I am going to party rally and
:>> > must maintain Teutonic Perfection. Sieg Heil and have a very frohlich
:>> > Weihnachten (Nazi code for Merry Christmas).
:>>
:>> Oooo. I've been insulted. Whatever shall I do? Boy it's a good
:>> thing I spent that time in the Forces so I can deal with being
:>> insulted by professionals.
:>>
:>> --
:>> Keith Morrison
:>> lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
:>> http://www.dmmw.com/lonewolf/keithm.html
:>
:>I am a good shot Talmudist if you come and find me I will demonstrate my
:>skill to you. Do you have any idea what the Desert Eagle .50 would do to
:>your head? I would be legal too- self defense from a rabid virulent
:>anti-Christ. I promise you that your kind are not welcome in my part of
:>the country and I am on first name basis with the local D.A. Hunt me
:>down and you will be put out of your misery like a rabid dog. One shot
:>one kill dead eye Doc Tavish.
Then you are in deep shit, "Doc", because just above, you issued an
invitation
to Mr. Morrison to come in down to your place and even offered to pay
his
airfare. Now you say that if he does come and find you, you will shoot
him in
the head with a Desert Eagle .50. You are openly inviting him down so
you can
kill him.
I think perhaps some other people need to know about this.
Posted and e-mailed.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
<quote>
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>In <391f5e19...@news.flash.net>, on Mon, 15 May 2000 02:23:57 GMT,
>doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
>
>> You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
>> death threat posts like Nazihunter has done! Justify your libel you've
>> made below!
>Sure Doc. Remember this?
Your engineered post in which you took one part-- me offering to fly Joel
and Morrison to Hollywood because I thought they were great comedians
and you editing two different posts together? Yes I remember your attempt
to fabricate a death threat. Strange you give as an example a post you
made instead of an actual post I made! (BTW the attribution marks on the
left hand side betray you as well as my saying: " I would be legal too-
self defense...")
BTW its 10:40 pm csdst and DejaCom appears to be down. I can't even pull
up the archive for your post below but when it is back up I'll get my
original posts and really rub your nose in it!
The above was one post offering to fly Joel and Morrison to Hollywood as a
comedy act which you carefully edited out! Why else would I have
mentioned: "You may need a geek as a side act for your show. Keith are you
up to biting off the heads of snakes?" Hardly passes for me inviting them
to come see me!
Below is a part of another post made. Notice that I did not say I was
going to hunt Keith down and I was speaking from a defensive posture.
If I was going to fly Morrison to me as Gort indicates above then why
would he have to find me as indicated below!
Also notice the attribute marks in the left hand columns betray these as
being from two seperate posts! I haven't forgotten this fabrication Gort!
Why don't you show the alleged "threats" being made by me with my
actual posts instead of using your contrived proof?
>:>I am a good shot Talmudist if you come and find me I will demonstrate my
>:>skill to you. Do you have any idea what the Desert Eagle .50 would do to
>:>your head? I would be legal too- self defense from a rabid virulent
>:>anti-Christ. I promise you that your kind are not welcome in my part of
>:>the country and I am on first name basis with the local D.A. Hunt me
>:>down and you will be put out of your misery like a rabid dog. One shot
>:>one kill dead eye Doc Tavish.
>
>Then you are in deep shit, "Doc", because just above, you issued an
>invitation to Mr. Morrison to come in down to your place and even offered to pay
>his airfare. Now you say that if he does come and find you, you will shoot
>him in the head with a Desert Eagle .50. You are openly inviting him down so
>you can kill him.
>
>I think perhaps some other people need to know about this.
>
>Posted and e-mailed.
>
>--
>Gord McFee
>I'll write no line before its time
>
><quote>
>Gord McFee
~~End of Gord's Manufactured Post~~
Your post is a sham and you know it! You should be ashamed of yourself
Gort and apologize. Telling lies will not save your pal from having to
send me a nice big fat juicy check in the mail will it?
Isn't this forging posts Gort?
Doc Tavish
david.e.michael
John Morris wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 14
> May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
> ><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> >>that.
>
> >>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
> >>lie.
>
> >More important just look at what the person making the death threat
> >anon server left intact:
>
> >Path:
> >news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w
> >!spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
> >From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
> >Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
> >Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
> >Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
> >Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
> >NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>
> >The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent off
> >to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation by law
> >enforcement!
>
> I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
> of his victims actually does something to stop him.
>
> I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with the
> attention.
>
> - --
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
> at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBOR89BDfbIykA6SysEQIfbQCg6i+EcsPmhXnCjsJU7HpjZO039joAoIOr
> v52eYaXRTa9d2I1RfL+Vz8lb
> =hDe1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
You claim to know who he is.
Shop him.
But you won't.
Because he's part of a double act with you.
You post people's real names. He looks for the addresses and telephone
numbers and posts them.
David
david.e.michael
John Morris wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In <391f47bb...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Mon, 15
> May 2000 01:10:37 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 14 May 2000 23:55:17 GMT, John Morris
> ><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>
> >>0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun,
> >>14 May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
> >>wrote:
>
> >>>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
> >>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> >>>>that.
>
> >>>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
> >>>>lie.
>
> >>>More important just look at what the person making the death
> >>>threat anon server left intact:
>
> >>>Path:
> >>>news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln
> >>>-w !spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
> >>>From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
> >>>Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
> >>>Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
> >>>Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
> >>>Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
> >>>NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>
> >>>The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent
> >>>off to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation
> >>>by law enforcement!
>
> >>I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
> >>of his victims actually does something to stop him.
>
> >>I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with
> >>the attention.
>
> >Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me.
> >Imagine having death threat telephone calls and four of them
> >successfully call traced and being acted upon, imagine having your
> >telephone ring all hours of the day and night and the person hanging
> >up when you've answered, imagine having your unlisted address and
> >unlisted telephone number posted numerous times with definite
> >(beyond any doubt) death threats and then you'll know. Imagine
> >having an incurable medical disorder which prevents you from going
> >to work or being able to drive and it affecting your blood pressure
> >and being harassed criminally night and day and having the person
> >responsible lauging about it!
>
> Please contact me by private e-mail when the police are ready to
> contact me.
>
> [snip]
>
> - --
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
> at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBOR9PsDfbIykA6SysEQJk6ACgq74fwYqk6MU01RZKrLxFlmUnGBQAn2gz
> NPzwFPBvSsViSL+5RrzMLVP2
> =127t
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Why?
So you can skip the country?
David
Doc Tavish
>In article <02561185...@usw-ex0104-028.remarq.com>, Blakely
><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>I thought you did not talk about Don Ellis. You lied again. And
>>can you prove that Don Ellis threatened your family? Something
>>tells me you can't.
>I never said he threatened my family, Liar.
>
>And here's what you snipped, Liar. Scott Bradbury's threats:
You also conveniently leave out what was said by others and you also
failed to notice the emoticon ":-)" which is universally meant to be said
in humour or tongue in cheek. You really are desperate with your
squealings now little sow. Squeal little sow squeal.
Also take notice that the majority of posts are three years old and I have
largely changed my style. If the squealing little sow and her fellow pigs
really thought I threatened them then why didn't they take action back in
1997 instead of dredging up old posts and not even in context?
Sure sign your side is desperate!
You're squealing like a little sow again!
Doc Tavish
>Sara
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>In article <BQGT4.12651$wb7.1...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless
>Scottie "beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>
>>I was at a Chinese restaurant the other day and my fortune cookie
>>said: "You should expect a sudden gift of money."
>You must have gotten Yale's cookie by mistake, Cockroach Boy.
Don't think so.
>Check. Certified.
That's what I expect to get. Six figures too! Your pal lied about how he
obtained my confidential info but I have his copy of the subpoena now.
You pal admitted to disseminating my confidential subpoenaed information
to his own personal mailing list. Very illegal and most unethical. Because
of your pal's lack of self control and common sense I am now receiving
death threats and having the directions to my house posted. For you to
keep saying that I owe Yale money shows how mentally disturbed you are
Brown. I can only wish the same happens to you!
Doc Tavish
>JGB
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>In article <391f47bb...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>
>>Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me.
>Of course, that rule only applies to other folks. Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>will judge anybody he wishes. If he can't find a reason to condemn
>someone, he'll happily forge an email to supply one.
The letter from Flash Net was not forged and it has been submitted to the
proper authorites as well as e-mail originating both from enter.net and
subsequent e-mails made via aol.com after Flash Net placed a block against
said accused stalker.
[...]
>You _are_ that sad, deluded little cockroach.
All you can do is name call when you've been bested. Judging by the
viciousness of your latest attacks I must really be getting to you!
>JGB
>
>P.S. _Everybody_ laughs at you, Scottie.
I'll bet that Yale F. Edeiken isn't laughing!
Doc Tavish
>
>=========================================================
Doc Tavish
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Doc,
>
>If you do contact the RCMP and they do an investigation, I will
>gladly help in anyway possible to get this person put behind
>bars.
They have already been contacted to the best of my knowledge.
>Don't expect any help from the Nizkorphiles, because we know
>what they think about this.
They don't want to face the fact their pride and joy is in hot water.
Notice how they can't accept reality?
david.e.michael
Blakely wrote:
> Doc,
>
> If you do contact the RCMP and they do an investigation, I will
> gladly help in anyway possible to get this person put behind
> bars.
>
> Don't expect any help from the Nizkorphiles, because we know
> what they think about this.
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
If you want to nail him, just get a PI to trace him. He's left a very wide
trail. I was quoted $500 to get him but I didn't bother because he does his
cause more harm than good.
David
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <391F760F...@variousisps.co.uk> in alt.revisionism, on Mon,
15 May 2000 04:59:11 +0100, "david.e.michael"
<david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
>John Morris wrote:
>> 0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun,
>> 14 May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc
>> Tavish) wrote:
>> >On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
>> ><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>> >>that.
>> >>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>> >>lie.
>> >More important just look at what the person making the death
>> >threat anon server left intact:
>> >Path:
>> >news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pl
>> >n-w !spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
>> >From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
>> >Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
>> >Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
>> >Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
>> >Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
>> >NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>> >The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent
>> >off to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation
>> >by law enforcement!
>> I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until
>> one of his victims actually does something to stop him.
>> I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with
>> the attention.
>You claim to know who he is.
>Shop him.
To whom?
>But you won't.
THe crime requires a complainant. None has stepped forward.
>Because he's part of a double act with you.
Fuck you, lying Dave.
>You post people's real names. He looks for the addresses and
>telephone numbers and posts them.
As I say: fuck you, lying Dave.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOR+AqzfbIykA6SysEQJX9ACgu9m6DUrjaPpJ/cPky7l4yvFqTJwAoN3M
mO4ABjf+JKQvSRvI8e60BwWd
=gaXO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <391F7671...@variousisps.co.uk> in alt.revisionism, on Mon,
15 May 2000 05:00:49 +0100, "david.e.michael"
<david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
>John Morris wrote:
>> In <391f47bb...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Mon,
>> 15 May 2000 01:10:37 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc
>> Tavish) wrote:
>> >On Sun, 14 May 2000 23:55:17 GMT, John Morris
>> ><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>> >>0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on
>> >>Sun, 14 May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc
>> >>Tavish) wrote:
>> >>>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
>> >>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat
>> >>>>like that.
>> >>>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
>> >>>>lie.
>> >>>More important just look at what the person making the death
>> >>>threat anon server left intact:
>> >>>Path:
>> >>>news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!
>> >>>pln -w !spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
>> Please contact me by private e-mail when the police are ready to
>> contact me.
>> [snip]
>Why?
>So you can skip the country?
No. So I can tell him the name of my police contact without
revealing my unlisted telephone number to you.
Oh, and fuck you, Dave.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOR+BXjfbIykA6SysEQIpwQCeJL8UdPWq/gcYQp2FXbPK2JFCxFMAoP8A
1JT/DuTVwsCFyGHPmtnh2rQU
=bDjS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <098c42a0...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com> in alt.revisionism,
on Sun, 14 May 2000 21:11:49 -0700, Blakely
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Doc,
>If you do contact the RCMP and they do an investigation, I will
>gladly help in anyway possible to get this person put behind
>bars.
>Don't expect any help from the Nizkorphiles, because we know
>what they think about this.
Yes, Don. The condemnation of the kind of thuggery you and
Nazihunter indulge in has been universally condemned.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOR+CmjfbIykA6SysEQLw4gCgwhKzlac89GQmzyJh3hT0Pf4AiDMAn3Ds
hy3fHA4C/Gs70HE8vdxk8xuq
=mKnB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <391f79e1...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Mon, 15
May 2000 04:16:52 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
wrote:
>On Sun, 14 May 2000 21:11:49 -0700, Blakely
><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>Doc,
>>If you do contact the RCMP and they do an investigation, I will
>>gladly help in anyway possible to get this person put behind
>>bars.
>They have already been contacted to the best of my knowledge.
>>Don't expect any help from the Nizkorphiles, because we know
>>what they think about this.
>They don't want to face the fact their pride and joy is in hot
>water. Notice how they can't accept reality?
Get up off your fat ass and lodge a criminal complaint already.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOR+D9TfbIykA6SysEQLc0QCglxct1qdDjiP7joMSXm7bZuBdO5UAn3A3
oeReGY0xBGsG63mH4ZBtd8ji
=IkNX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Steve
Doc Tavish, psychopath and net-loony, wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
> <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> >that.
> >
> >Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
> >lie.
>
> More important just look at what the person making the death threat anon
> server left intact:
>
> Path:
> news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w!spln!
> extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
> From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
> Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
> Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
> Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
> Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>
> The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent off to
> NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation by law
> enforcement!
>
> Doc Tavish
Snottie, your 'subsequent investigation by law enforcement' is about as
credible as your Cessna Citation. Both are good for a laugh.
Steve
Werewolf
"Jeffrey G. Brown" <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:jg_brown-140...@cvg-27-166-003.cinci.rr.com...
> >having death threat telephone calls and four of them successfully call
> >traced and being acted upon, imagine having your telephone ring all
hours
> >of the day and night and the person hanging up when you've answered,
> >imagine having your unlisted address and unlisted telephone number
posted
> >numerous times with definite (beyond any doubt) death threats and then
> >you'll know. Imagine having an incurable medical disorder which
prevents
> >you from going to work or being able to drive and it affecting your
blood
> >pressure and being harassed criminally night and day and having the
person
> >responsible lauging about it!
>
post
> a fake announcement of your own "death" -- to avoid being held
responsible
> for your actions.
Big deal.
> Imagine being caught posting pornography and claiming
> that the photos are of 'Israeli atrocities'.
I recall that photo. Only fools thought it was real.
> Imagine making up dozens of
> sock puppets in a vain attempt to deceive yourself that somebody else --
> ANYBODY else -- believes your year-in, year-out stream of utter
bullshit.
Again, big deal.
Even if everything you say is true, that still doesn't excuse telephone
harrassment, death threats, etc. but that is exactly what you are doing,
Brown. We all can see what you're worth.
It almost sounds like you might have some inside info about the
harrassment against Doc. Have you ever called him? Do you know about
anyone who did?
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Werewolf http://www.lcsys.net/werewolf/
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Kenneth McVay, OBC
William "I ain't Ian McInney this week" Scott, posting as, er,
"Werewolf" <were...@lcsys.net> wrote:
>Even if everything you say is true, that still doesn't excuse telephone
>harrassment, death threats, etc. but that is exactly what you are doing,
>Brown. We all can see what you're worth.
>
>It almost sounds like you might have some inside info about the
>harrassment against Doc. Have you ever called him? Do you know about
>anyone who did?
What telephone harrassment, Mr. Scott?
Which "death threats?"
Given high nature of your bullshit quotient, Mr. Scott, I think it
only fair that we apply the academic standards of Holocaust denial,
right? Surely you - a Holocaust scholar of some notariety - would not
sacrifice your high standards of evidence, would you, Mr. Scott?
Nossir! You will join us and demand EVIDENCE of these rather bizarre
events, won't you, Red?
Let's have your evidence, Mr. Scott - use Greg Raven's standards, and
fill your boots, Bubba.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/s/scott.william/ -
--
The Nizkor Project | Remember: http://www.nizkor.org
-----------------------|
Kenneth McVay, OBC |--------------------------------------------
Director | Home: http://www.nizkor.org/~kmcvay
Fragano Ledgister
>
>On 15 May 2000 01:48:57 GMT, fled...@aol.comkillspam (Fragano Ledgister)
>
>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
>>>that.
>
>
>You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
>death threat posts like Nazihunter has done! Justify your libel you've
>made below!
>
As Sara Salzman and Jeffrey G. Brown have posted the relevant information,
proving tht you have made death threats, I must insist that you retract the
accusation that I am a liar.
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On 14 May 2000 23:00:33 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
> [...deletia...]
>>Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>>will judge anybody he wishes. If he can't find a reason to condemn
>>someone, he'll happily forge an email to supply one.
>
>The letter from Flash Net was not forged...
So what? You have posted other forged emails -- two of them supposedly
from myself.
> [...deletia...]
>>You _are_ that sad, deluded little cockroach.
>
>All you can do is name call when you've been bested. Judging by the
>viciousness of your latest attacks I must really be getting to you!
Cockroach Boy, you don't "get to" anybody. That's not what clowns like you do.
> [...deletia...]
>>P.S. _Everybody_ laughs at you, Scottie.
>
>I'll bet that Yale F. Edeiken isn't laughing!
_Everybody_, Gutless.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown
<patbl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>How do you know for sure it is Scott Bradbury.
Read the headers, idiot.
> [...deletia...]
>Prove Bradbury actually posted the stuff.
Read the headers, idiot.
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>>Check. Certified.
>
>That's what I expect to get.
That's what you are require to send, Gutless.
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On 14 May 2000 21:35:07 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>>And here's what you snipped, Liar. Scott Bradbury's threats:
>
>You also conveniently leave out what was said by others and you also
>failed to notice the emoticon ":-)" which is universally meant to be said
>in humour or tongue in cheek.
A threat is a threat, little cockroach. A few punctuation marks after a
threat doesn't change what it is.
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>In article <391f5e19...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>
>>You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
>>death threat posts like Nazihunter has done!
Strange that you post the same exact cut'n'patse that Sara did in her
post Jeffrey! Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too! I've seen
it before! Care to explain just how you two posted the same exact
material? Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too! I've seen it
before! How can you Nizkooks deny a conspiracy amongst you vermin?
Never mind-- I didn't break the law like your pal did when he distributed
my confidential info he unscrupulously obtained using a subpoena. He will
be held responsible for his criminal act! BTW your subject title has a
threatening tone to it Jeffrey! Are you threatening me? It is plain that
you are harassing me. Aren't you capable of just one independent idea or
thought or are you a herd animal all the way?
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Date: 14 May 2000 21:35:07 EDT
Message-ID: <catamont-140...@ts003d13.den-co.concentric.net>
On 14 May 2000 21:35:07 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>On 04/16/1997:
>
>"I do believe that Bruno would derive great pleasure in applying his craft....
Need I say more?
Doc Tavish
>**********************
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>In article <391f748b...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>
>>On 14 May 2000 21:35:07 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>> [...deletia...]
>
>>>And here's what you snipped, Liar. Scott Bradbury's threats:
>>
>>You also conveniently leave out what was said by others and you also
>>failed to notice the emoticon ":-)" which is universally meant to be said
>>in humour or tongue in cheek.
>A threat is a threat, little cockroach. A few punctuation marks after a
>threat doesn't change what it is.
Strange law enforcement doesn't have the same belief and that's what
counts! The only reason your crooked lawyer pal Edeiken filed a civil
lawsuit is because law enforcement wouldn't pay attention to his paranoid
rants! He's even said so in so many words! BTW do you still want to
fellate me? Won't happen!
Doc Tavish
Sara Salzman
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>On 14 May 2000 23:00:33 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
>wrote:
>
>>In article <391f47bb...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>>"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>>
>>>Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me.
>
>>Of course, that rule only applies to other folks. Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>>will judge anybody he wishes. If he can't find a reason to condemn
>>someone, he'll happily forge an email to supply one.
>
>The letter from Flash Net was not forged and it has been submitted to the
>proper authorites as well as e-mail originating both from enter.net and
>subsequent e-mails made via aol.com after Flash Net placed a block against
>said accused stalker.
>
>[...]
>
>>You _are_ that sad, deluded little cockroach.
>
>All you can do is name call when you've been bested. Judging by the
>viciousness of your latest attacks I must really be getting to you!
>
>>JGB
>>
>>P.S. _Everybody_ laughs at you, Scottie.
>
>I'll bet that Yale F. Edeiken isn't laughing!
>
> Doc Tavish
Sure he is. Along with the rest of us. You've been threatening legal
action for more than a year, Bradbury. You've also been threatening people
with "Bruno's lash." You're a sad, pathetic old man with nothing better to
do than complain about how you've been treated. What you don't seem to get
is that you have asked for it, over and over again.
Sara
--
"I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
Edith Sitwell
Sara Salzman
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>How do you know for sure it is Scott Bradbury. Those postings
>could easily of been fakes. I see many postings about you
>molesting boys but you dismiss them as fakes.
>
>Prove Bradbury actually posted the stuff.
>
Why? Mr. Bradbury hasn't denied posting them. In fact, he's made a lot of
statements about how he's "changed" since they were posted....
Blakely
Jeffrey G Brown or stop whining about it.
Blakely
Why did you delete out all of Scott Bradbury's postings from the
Nizkor ftp archives?
Blakely
Why do you support and attorney who has been reported to have
been disciplined by the State of Pennsylvania for unethical
conduct, sued for malpractice, incarcerated, whom we understand
have been charged with unethical conduct, have engaged in
conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or
to bring the courts and the legal business into disrepute, etc.
Explain why you support a disgraced lawyer.
Sara Salzman
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Sara,
>
>Why do you support and attorney who has been reported to have
>been disciplined by the State of Pennsylvania for unethical
>conduct, sued for malpractice, incarcerated, whom we understand
>have been charged with unethical conduct, have engaged in
>conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or
>to bring the courts and the legal business into disrepute, etc.
>
>http://www.clr.org/pa.html
>
>Explain why you support a disgraced lawyer.
>
Mr. Blakely, that information has been debunked so many times it's not
even funny anymore.
Go look in the DejaNews archives for at least 50 posts debunking David
Michael's smear campaign.
By the way, I don't support "and" attorney.
Second, I have not seen any information that Yale has ever been
incarcerated. The charges you so gleefully spread around (and you accise
ME of gossip?) were, AFAIK, dismissed.
And please, tell me what this has to do with the topic of revisionism?
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>In <391f5e19...@news.flash.net>, on Mon, 15 May 2000 02:23:57 GMT,
>doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
>
>> You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
>> death threat posts like Nazihunter has done! Justify your libel you've
>> made below!
>Sure Doc. Remember this?
Your engineered post in which you took one part-- me offering to fly Joel
and Morrison to Hollywood because I thought they were great comedians
and you editing two different posts together? Yes I remember your attempt
to fabricate a death threat. Strange you give as an example a post you
made instead of an actual post I made! (BTW the attribution marks on the
left hand side betray you as well as my saying: " I would be legal too-
self defense...")
BTW its 10:40 pm csdst and DejaCom appears to be down. I can't even pull
up the archive for your post below but when it is back up I'll get my
original posts and really rub your nose in it!
><quote>
>
>Path: news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net!not-for-mail
>From: gmc...@ibm.net (Gord McFee)
>Newsgroups:
>alt.revisionism,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,
>alt.fan.g-gordon-liddy
>Subject: Re: Giwer more or less admits that he is a drunk...
>Date: 19 Dec 1996 20:43:39 GMT
>Lines: 46
>Message-ID: <59c9dr$uv2$3...@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net>
>References: <gandhi-ya0231800...@news.bctel.ca>
><19961212201...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
><32b068d5...@news.winternet.com>
><58rp8o$jo0$1...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <32B1CD...@nbnet.nb.ca>
><58veji$22f$2...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <joelr.62...@winternet.com>
><32B3FF...@nbnet.nb.ca> <5954rg$73$2...@uhura.phoenix.net>
><32B722...@nbnet.nb.ca><gandhi-ya0231800...@news.bctel.ca>
><19961212201...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
><32b068d5...@news.winternet.com>
><58rp8o$jo0$1...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <32B1CD...@nbnet.nb.ca>
><58veji$22f$2...@gryphon.phoenix.net> <joelr.62...@winternet.com>
><32B3FF...@nbnet.nb.ca> <5954rg$73$2...@uhura.phoenix.net>
><32B722...@nbnet.nb.ca> <59altg$ov2$3...@uhura.phoenix.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: slip129-37-167-108.pq.ca.ibm.net
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Newsreader: NeoLogic News for OS/2 [version: 4.5d]
>Xref: news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net alt.revisionism:116316
>alt.conspiracy:200378 alt.politics.nationalism.white:58581
>alt.politics.white-power:78703 alt.fan.g-gordon-liddy:59136
>
>In message <59altg$ov2$3...@uhura.phoenix.net> - Doc Tavish
><"tav...@phoenix.net"@phoenix.net>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 23:59:27 -0600
>writes:
>:>
>:>Keith Morrison wrote:
>:>>
>:>> Doc Tavish wrote:
>:>>
>:>> > Joel I will pay Keith's first class airfare too. You may need a geek as
>:>> > a side act for your show. Keith are you up to biting off the heads of
>:>> > snakes? Got to go and polish my jackboots- I am going to party rally and
>:>> > must maintain Teutonic Perfection. Sieg Heil and have a very frohlich
>:>> > Weihnachten (Nazi code for Merry Christmas).
>:>>
>:>> Oooo. I've been insulted. Whatever shall I do? Boy it's a good
>:>> thing I spent that time in the Forces so I can deal with being
>:>> insulted by professionals.
>:>>
>:>> --
>:>> Keith Morrison
>:>> lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
>:>> http://www.dmmw.com/lonewolf/keithm.html
The above was one post offering to fly Joel and Morrison to Hollywood as a
comedy act which you carefully edited out! Why else would I have
mentioned: "You may need a geek as a side act for your show. Keith are you
up to biting off the heads of snakes?" Hardly passes for me inviting them
to come see me!
Below is a part of another post made. Notice that I did not say I was
going to hunt Keith down and I was speaking from a defensive posture.
If I was going to fly Morrison to me as Gort indicates above then why
would he have to find me as indicated below!
Also notice the attribute marks in the left hand columns betray these as
being from two seperate posts! I haven't forgotten this fabrication Gort!
Why don't you show the alleged "threats" being made by me with my
actual posts instead of using your contrived proof?
>:>I am a good shot Talmudist if you come and find me I will demonstrate my
>:>skill to you. Do you have any idea what the Desert Eagle .50 would do to
>:>your head? I would be legal too- self defense from a rabid virulent
>:>anti-Christ. I promise you that your kind are not welcome in my part of
>:>the country and I am on first name basis with the local D.A. Hunt me
>:>down and you will be put out of your misery like a rabid dog. One shot
>:>one kill dead eye Doc Tavish.
>
>Then you are in deep shit, "Doc", because just above, you issued an
>invitation to Mr. Morrison to come in down to your place and even offered to pay
>his airfare. Now you say that if he does come and find you, you will shoot
>him in the head with a Desert Eagle .50. You are openly inviting him down so
>you can kill him.
>
>I think perhaps some other people need to know about this.
>
>Posted and e-mailed.
>
>--
>Gord McFee
>I'll write no line before its time
>
><quote>
>Gord McFee
~~End of Gord's Manufactured Post~~
Your post is a sham and you know it! You should be ashamed of yourself
Gort and apologize. Telling lies will not save your pal from having to
send me a nice big fat juicy check in the mail will it?
Isn't this forging posts Gort?
Doc Tavish
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Additional comment May 15, 2000
BTW Gort do you know what the penalties are for giving false testimony or
fabricated evidence? If the above were presented as fact it would be
exposed as perjury once the original posts were retrieved. You side is
surely pathetic when they have to resort to manufacturing evidence.
Doc Tavish
>In article <0b8c6b1b...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>, Blakely
><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>How do you know for sure it is Scott Bradbury. Those postings
>>could easily of been fakes. I see many postings about you
>>molesting boys but you dismiss them as fakes.
>>
>>Prove Bradbury actually posted the stuff.
>Why? Mr. Bradbury hasn't denied posting them. In fact, he's made a lot of
>statements about how he's "changed" since they were posted....
Yes I've changed my style! BTW squealing little sow- if my Bruno posts
were so "threatening" then why was a not asingle complaint made at the
time? There is such thing as making timely police reports you know. How
come you did not show the Bruno posts in their full context and with
DejaCom links? Finally how come those that Bruno responded to didn't take
the post as a threat at the time and file a police report themselves?
These are very pertinent questions you should consider. Also how is that
both you and Jeffrey G. Brown post identically the same exact (right down
to the punctuation and spacing) the same material? Looks conspiratorial to
me-- i.e. distributed cut'n'paste. Now finally I ask what are the odds
that both you and Jeffrey "operating independently" of each other would
somehow post identical text?
You now have a deserved right to squeal like a little sow! Squeal little
sow squeal!
Sara's message ID:
<catamont-140...@ts003d13.den-co.concentric.net>
Subject: Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Date: 14 May 2000 21:35:07 EDT
Jeffrey G. Brown's message ID:
<jg_brown-140...@cvg-27-166-003.cinci.rr.com>
Subject: Be careful what you wish for, Cockroach Boy...
Date: 14 May 2000 23:38:20 -0500
Doc Tavish
>Sara
Doc Tavish
>Sure Doc. Remember this?
Doc Tavish
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
exposed as perjury once the original posts were retrieved. Your side is
surely pathetic when they have to resort to manufacturing evidence and
having to go back three years in time at that! Why weren't you people
"threatened" enough three years ago to file police reports? Your obvious
desperation is showing Gort!
Blakely
over a legit lawyer watchdog group?
Face it Sara, Yale Edeiken, your friend is a disgraced lawyer.
Case closed.
In article <catamont-150...@ts010d26.den-
Sara Salzman
<patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>So I am supposed to believe you, a noted liar and gossipmonger
>over a legit lawyer watchdog group?
>
>http://www.clr.org/pa.html
LEGITIMATE>?!?!? That's one of the funniest things you've posted to date,
Mr. Blakely.
>
>Face it Sara, Yale Edeiken, your friend is a disgraced lawyer.
Not in the slightest.
>
>Case closed.
You have THAT right. You're an idiot and a liar, and are posting
information so thoroughly debunked, you ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Sara
PS. Never has my sig line been so thoroughly fitting.
Doc Tavish
>In article <1f9fb898...@usw-ex0102-084.remarq.com>, Blakely
><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>So I am supposed to believe you, a noted liar and gossipmonger
>>over a legit lawyer watchdog group?
>>
>>http://www.clr.org/pa.html
>LEGITIMATE>?!?!? That's one of the funniest things you've posted to date,
>Mr. Blakely.
My G-d-- squealing like a little sow at noontime on a work day! I am on
medical disablity and can't drive or work but what's your excuse little
sow? :-)
Doc Tavish
>Sara
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:391f78c2...@news.flash.net...
> On 14 May 2000 23:00:33 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
> wrote:
>
> >In article <391f47bb...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
> >"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> >
> >>Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me.
>
> >Of course, that rule only applies to other folks. Poor Ol' Gutless
Scottie
> >will judge anybody he wishes. If he can't find a reason to condemn
> >someone, he'll happily forge an email to supply one.
>
> The letter from Flash Net was not forged and it has been submitted to the
> proper authorites as well as e-mail originating both from enter.net and
> subsequent e-mails made via aol.com after Flash Net placed a block against
> said accused stalker.
And they ;laughed at you.
> [...]
>
> >You _are_ that sad, deluded little cockroach.
> >P.S. _Everybody_ laughs at you, Scottie.
>
> I'll bet that Yale F. Edeiken isn't laughing!
Then pu wpuld lose that bet, Defendant Bradbury. The Rule to Show Cause
holding you in contempt is on the judge's desk.
Too late for a check for the money you owe me.
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
Yale F. Edeiken
Blakely <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:1819f9b0...@usw-ex0103-024.remarq.com...
> If you got absolute proof Doc forged your email, then sue him
> Jeffrey G Brown or stop whining about it.
>
I have that proof. That5's why Defendant Bradbury is running so hard.
Yale F. Edeiken
Blakely <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:07716536...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com...
> Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> that.
You are, as usual, full of shit.
Here's just one example of e-mail that Bradbury sent to me:
"y are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
It should be noted that in my action against Bradbury at least 15 such
threats were documented to the court. As a result the court ordered, as you
know, the sheriff to provide security for his deposition/
You have been caught in another lie.
Yale F. Edeiken
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
news:cqjuhsc15j9l8dhgo...@4ax.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In <391f47bb...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Mon, 15
> May 2000 01:10:37 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 14 May 2000 23:55:17 GMT, John Morris
> ><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>
> >>0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun,
> >>14 May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
> >>wrote:
>
> >>>On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
> >>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>>>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> >>>>that.
>
> >>>>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
> >>>>lie.
>
> >>>More important just look at what the person making the death
> >>>threat anon server left intact:
>
> >>>Path:
> >>>news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln
> >>>-w !spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
> >>>From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
> >>>Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
> >>>Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
> >>>Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
> >>>Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
> >>>NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
>
> >>>The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent
> >>>off to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation
> >>>by law enforcement!
>
> >>I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
> >>of his victims actually does something to stop him.
>
> >>I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with
> >>the attention.
>
> >Until you've walked in my shoes you have no right to judge me.
> >Imagine having death threat telephone calls and four of them
> >successfully call traced and being acted upon, imagine having your
> >telephone ring all hours of the day and night and the person hanging
> >up when you've answered, imagine having your unlisted address and
> >unlisted telephone number posted numerous times with definite
> >(beyond any doubt) death threats and then you'll know. Imagine
> >having an incurable medical disorder which prevents you from going
> >to work or being able to drive and it affecting your blood pressure
> >and being harassed criminally night and day and having the person
> >responsible lauging about it!
>
> Please contact me by private e-mail when the police are ready to
> contact me.
Don't hold your breath.
The first thing the FU will do is check Bradbury's record.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:391f5a8d...@news.flash.net...
> On Sun, 14 May 2000 23:55:17 GMT, John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
> wrote:
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
Considering the volume of such threats you have issued over the years,
perhaps you should take your own advice.
> Imagine
> having death threat telephone calls and four of them successfully call
> traced and being acted upon, imagine having your telephone ring all hours
> of the day and night and the person hanging up when you've answered,
As you have attempted to do to others.
> imagine having your unlisted address and unlisted telephone number posted
> numerous times with definite (beyond any doubt) death threats and then
> you'll know.
Then why have you done that.
> Imagine having an incurable medical disorder which prevents
> you from going to work or being able to drive and it affecting your blood
> pressure and being harassed criminally night and day and having the person
> responsible laughing about it!
You thought it was hilarious when doing it to others.
> How convincing will the testimony of three different doctors be that what
> your pal has put me through has been injurious to my health? Also take
> note how cute he thinks he is by mentioning my blood pressure!
Though shit, Bradbury.
> ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
At which point it became public information.
Sorry, shithead, but you lose again.
> Justice is going to be served soon and all of the harassment against me
> will stop.
>
Of course it will, the Rue to Show Cause holding you in contempt in on
the judge's desk.
> As for my my address and telephone number being posted-- in a short time
> they will change with an expected settlement I expect to have coming my
> way. It is only proper to make the unremorseful person responsible for his
> criminally distributing confidential information obtained using a subpoena
> to be used criminally.
>
It is not confidential. It is now a matter of public record.
> BTW why haven't I heard any of your fellow clowns making their remarks
> about "bench warraants" or if the "certified check is in the mail" lately?
I did last Friday, to a judge. The Rule is now on his desk.
> As for your comment: "I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation
> that comes with the attention." YES I am enjoying rubbing all of my former
> taunters noses in all the shit they've dumped around like dogs. If a dog
> shits on the floor his nose should be rubbed in it and I liken many of
> your fellows to being worthless dogs that shit on the floor.
And I intend to keep rubbing your nose in it.
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On 14 May 2000 23:38:20 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
>wrote:
>
>>In article <391f5e19...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>>"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>>
>>>You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
>>>death threat posts like Nazihunter has done!
>
>Strange that you post the same exact cut'n'patse that Sara did in her
>post Jeffrey! Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too! I've seen
>it before! Care to explain just how you two posted the same exact
>material?
Sure. Sara compiled the list of threats you have made, and I rubbed your
nose in them again.
>Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too! I've seen it
>before! How can you Nizkooks deny a conspiracy amongst you vermin?
We don't have to deny squat, O Gutless One. You have to prove conspiracy
in a court of law. Thus far, you've shown a strange reluctance to go near
such an establishment.
On the other hand, maybe it isn't so strange -- you are a coward, after all.
> [...deletia...]
>Need I say more?
Please do, Scottie. Every time you post, we get to point out what a
gutless little slug you really are.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:391f76d7...@news.flash.net...
> On 14 May 2000 22:09:35 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
> wrote:
>
> >In article <BQGT4.12651$wb7.1...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless
> >Scottie "beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> >
> >>I was at a Chinese restaurant the other day and my fortune cookie
> >>said: "You should expect a sudden gift of money."
>
> >You must have gotten Yale's cookie by mistake, Cockroach Boy.
>
> Don't think so.
>
\ The court thinks otherwise.
> >Check. Certified.
> That's what I expect to get. Six figures too! Your pal lied about how he
> obtained my confidential info but I have his copy of the subpoena now.
> You pal admitted to disseminating my confidential subpoenaed information
> to his own personal mailing list. Very illegal and most unethical.
Totally legal and quite proper.
> Because
> of your pal's lack of self control and common sense I am now receiving
> death threats and having the directions to my house posted. For you to
> keep saying that I owe Yale money shows how mentally disturbed you are
> Brown. I can only wish the same happens to you!
>
Shall I tell the court that you consider it "mentally disturbed?"
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On 15 May 2000 09:33:17 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>>In article <0b8c6b1b...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>, Blakely
>><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>How do you know for sure it is Scott Bradbury. Those postings
>>>could easily of been fakes. I see many postings about you
>>>molesting boys but you dismiss them as fakes.
>>>
>>>Prove Bradbury actually posted the stuff.
>
>>Why? Mr. Bradbury hasn't denied posting them. In fact, he's made a lot of
>>statements about how he's "changed" since they were posted....
>
>Yes I've changed my style!
But your earlier threats remain to haunt you. It's a tough life being a
gutless liar, ain't it, Cockroach Boy?
> [...deletia...]
>Finally how come those that Bruno responded to...
"Bruno" didn't respond to anyone, Cockroach Boy. That was you, hiding
behind yet another sock puppet.
Jeffrey G. Brown
<patbl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>So I am supposed to believe you, a noted liar and gossipmonger
>over a legit lawyer watchdog group?
>
>http://www.clr.org/pa.html
>
>Face it Sara, Yale Edeiken, your friend is a disgraced lawyer.
>
>Case closed.
You're a lying coward, little worm.
Case closed.
Yale F. Edeiken
Jeffrey G. Brown <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:jg_brown-150...@cvg-27-166-003.cinci.rr.com...
> In article <391f76d7...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
> "beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>
> >>Check. Certified.
> >
> >That's what I expect to get.
>
> That's what you are require to send, Gutless.
You are not quite correct. He was required to do so in a specific
amount of time.
He failed to do so.
Now he will have to explain to the court why he ignore its Order.
It's bench warrant time.
Jeffrey G. Brown
<patbl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>If you got absolute proof Doc forged your email, then sue him
>Jeffrey G Brown or stop whining about it.
I don't take orders from lying worms.
It's much more fun to publicly embarrass Scottie over and over again with
documentary proof of his lies.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:391fe8cc...@news.flash.net...
> On 15 May 2000 05:12:14 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
> wrote:
>
> >In article <391f748b...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
> >"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> >
> >>On 14 May 2000 21:35:07 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
wrote:
> >
> >> [...deletia...]
> >
> >>>And here's what you snipped, Liar. Scott Bradbury's threats:
> >>
> >>You also conveniently leave out what was said by others and you also
> >>failed to notice the emoticon ":-)" which is universally meant to be
said
> >>in humour or tongue in cheek.
>
> >A threat is a threat, little cockroach. A few punctuation marks after a
> >threat doesn't change what it is.
>
> Strange law enforcement doesn't have the same belief
Wrong.
>and that's what
> counts! The only reason your crooked lawyer pal Edeiken filed a civil
> lawsuit is because law enforcement wouldn't pay attention to his paranoid
> rants!
Wrong.
He's even said so in so many words!
That's another of your lies.
> BTW do you still want to
> fellate me? Won't happen!
Note hos Bradbury concludes with his usual actionable defamation.
Did you tell the "law enforcement" people about your death threats
Bradbury?
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:391f5e19...@news.flash.net...
> On 15 May 2000 01:48:57 GMT, fled...@aol.comkillspam (Fragano Ledgister)
> wrote:
>
> >>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> >>that.
>
> >No there isn't.
>
> You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
> death threat posts like Nazihunter has done! Justify your libel you've
> made below!
Sure right here:
" You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work
you over with an ice pick Yale!."
That was e-mailed to me. Quite stupid as it gave the courts in PA
jurisdiction over you.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:391fe645...@news.flash.net...
> On 14 May 2000 23:38:20 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
> wrote:
>
> >In article <391f5e19...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
> >"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> >
> >>You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
> >>death threat posts like Nazihunter has done!
>
> Strange that you post the same exact cut'n'patse that Sara did in her
> post Jeffrey! Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too!
And they are all true.
And a coirt has ruled that already.
> I've seen it before!
And didn't showe up in court to contest the accuracy.
> Care to explain just how you two posted the same exact
> material? Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too! I've seen it
> before! How can you Nizkooks deny a conspiracy amongst you vermin?
conspiracy to protect ourselves from your violent nature?
> Never mind-- I didn't break the law like your pal did when he distributed
> my confidential info he unscrupulously obtained using a subpoena. He will
> be held responsible for his criminal act!
Having a court issue a subpeona is a criminal act?
You're getting stranger by the moment.
> BTW your subject title has a
> threatening tone to it Jeffrey! Are you threatening me? It is plain that
> you are harassing me. Aren't you capable of just one independent idea or
> thought or are you a herd animal all the way?
Are you going to pay the fine that a court ordered you to pay?
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:391f5a8d...@news.flash.net...
Well I declare-- at least you aren't saying I'm <sonn...@flash.net>
anymore. I guess this means you are a tad smarter than Jeffrey G. Brown.
I haven't checked my-deja mailbox but I'll bet that you have graciously
supplied me with more evidence that you won't let up with e-mailing me
against my wishes.
[...]
> > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
>> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
>> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
> At which point it became public information.
It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena and then
illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list! Now I know
why you lied about how you obtained it.
Your distributing confidential information obtained using a subpoena is
illegal Yale. Care to deny it?! If my unlisted telephone number and
unlisted address were in the public domain you would not have had to issue
the subpoena to find out the confidential info in the first place!
> Sorry, shithead, but you lose again.
You must be looking in the mirror then criminal. Distributing subpoenaed
information via a personal mailing list is a crime in Pennsylvania! Once
again do you care to deny this for the record? Why would you lie about
issuing a subpoena in the first place as shown below. Count your lies-- I
count three!
http://x21.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=608403278&fmt=text
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.))
> Yale F. Edeiken is also on record as claiming that he never posted
> my private information. "
I never did.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your
attempts to incite criminal harassment.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my
civil rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000-- do you now wish to continue your
denial now that I have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal
possession Yale? Please do! I want everyone to see what a liar and
disreputable lawyer you are!))
http://x34.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=606542183&fmt=text
Subject: Re: See You In Court! ...
Date: 04/04/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cbsq...@news1.newsguy.com...
[...]
> Yale you and only you got my not in public domain information
> from Flash.Net after much duress made against them
That's a lie, criminal.
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net"
"This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290"
~~End of Edeiken on the Subpoena Issue~~
Here you are admitting that you criminally disseminated subpoenaed
information:
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:26:56 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
Message-ID: <385e...@news3.enter.net>
X-Trace: 20 Dec 1999 11:27:29 -0500, atmax-9-4.enter.net
Organization: Enter.Net
Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
news:faxdOHnEHgDROZ...@4ax.com...
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> >Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
> >news:J7pZOIj+KpQFqo...@4ax.com...
> >> I think it wrong to give Tavish's details to a list, (though I can understand the
> >> pressure that may have led him to do so)
(Edeiken speaks):
> > Save it for the next time you are running for office.
> It seems the best mitigation for your action to me.
(Edeiken speaks now in his "current" reply):
Nope. The best defense is the complete one. That it went to people
who had been victimized by Bradbury.
In fact, McVay's nonsense is just that. As all the recipients of the
e-mail except Ken knew was that there were then motions pending including
barring Bradbury from obtaining such material from me because of his
invasions of privacy and threats.
(Edeiken speaks):
> >I gave the information to a list of people who, almost without exception have
> >been the vicitims of threats of violence or criminal harassment from Bradbury. If
> >you ahve a problem with that, I could care less.
> --YFE
~~~End of Edeiken Admission to Passing Out Confidential Information~~~
There we have it Yale in black and white- documentation on your subpoena
which I have hard copies from Flash Net and your admission to
disseminating an unlisted telephone number and an unlisted address!
BTW how will you account for your continually e-mailing me against my
wishes, Flash Net blocking you from doing so from your enter.net account
and then you circumventing the block by using aol.com? Now that gives fair
evidence you're a stalker!
Doc Tavish
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
> On Mon, 15 May 2000 21:31:19 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> >news:391f5a8d...@news.flash.net...
>
> Well I declare-- at least you aren't saying I'm <sonn...@flash.net>
> anymore. I guess this means you are a tad smarter than Jeffrey G. Brown.
> I haven't checked my-deja mailbox but I'll bet that you have graciously
> supplied me with more evidence that you won't let up with e-mailing me
> against my wishes.
>
> [...]
>
> > > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
> >> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
> >> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
>
> > At which point it became public information.
> It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena
Correct. And the information was filed with a court.
> and then
> illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
Now I know
> why you lied about how you obtained it.
I never "lied." I stated that I received it by subpeona.
> Your distributing confidential information obtained using a subpoena is
> illegal Yale. Care to deny it?!
ABSOLUTELY. It is a court record when filed with the court and,
therefore, public information.
Ask a lawyer.
> If my unlisted telephone number and
> unlisted address were in the public domain you would not have had to issue
> the subpoena to find out the confidential info in the first place!
Put those two last neurons in your brain to work.
> > Sorry, shithead, but you lose again.
> You must be looking in the mirror then criminal. Distributing subpoenaed
> information via a personal mailing list is a crime in Pennsylvania!
You are full of shit.
> Once
> again do you care to deny this for the record?
ABSOLUTELY. In fact, the opposite is true. Information filed with a
court is public information unless there is a specific court order stating
otherwise.
> Why would you lie about
> issuing a subpoena in the first place as shown below. Count your lies-- I
> count three!
Then you can't count.
> BTW how will you account for your continually e-mailing me against my
> wishes, Flash Net blocking you from doing so from your enter.net account
> and then you circumventing the block by using aol.com? Now that gives fair
> evidence you're a stalker!
Thank you for proving agian that you are an incoherent lying fuck wjho
fantasizes conspiracies. I have never sent you anything through AOL as yu
calim. I do not have an AOL account, have never had an AOL account, and I
have no access to an AOL account.
Now produce your latest forgeries so that everybody can laugh at you.
And come up with a real explanation as to why you ignore court orders.
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:391fe645...@news.flash.net...
>> On 14 May 2000 23:38:20 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <391f5e19...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>> >"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>> >
>> >>You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
>> >>death threat posts like Nazihunter has done!
>> Strange that you post the same exact cut'n'patse that Sara did in her
>> post Jeffrey! Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too!
> And they are all true.
>
> And a coirt has ruled that already.
>> I've seen it before!
> And didn't showe up in court to contest the accuracy.
>> Care to explain just how you two posted the same exact
>> material? Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too! I've seen it
>> before! How can you Nizkooks deny a conspiracy amongst you vermin?
> conspiracy to protect ourselves from your violent nature?
Still a conspiracy never the less Yale!
>> Never mind-- I didn't break the law like your pal did when he distributed
>> my confidential info he unscrupulously obtained using a subpoena. He will
>> be held responsible for his criminal act!
> Having a court issue a subpeona is a criminal act?
A court didn't have a subpoena issued- YOU had the subpoena issued on your
own volition as stated at the bottom of the subpoena. No judge's name was
on the subpoena-- only your:
"This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290"
> You're getting stranger by the moment.
You're a fine one to be passing such judgment.
>> BTW your subject title has a threatening tone to it Jeffrey! Are you
>> threatening me? It is plain that you are harassing me. Aren't you
>> capable of just one independent idea or thought or are you a herd
>> animal all the way?
> Are you going to pay the fine that a court ordered you to pay?
What fine? I've seen no evidence I've been fined! The only thing I know is
how you are attempting to get a judge to support your extortion demands
against me. I really liked your latest snail mail too in which you
declared if I don't send a certified check you will have me arrested.
Everything I've seen is YOU ordering this or you threatening to do that!
Here you are "laughing" about your extortion demand:
http://x34.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=608943019&fmt=text
Subject: Re: Even More that Doc Tavish Is An Idiot
Date: 04/10/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cp4u...@news2.newsguy.com...
> From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
> Subject: Evidence that Doc Tavish Is An Idiot
> Date: 08 Apr 2000 22:10:47 EDT
> Organization: Concentric Internet Services
> Message-ID: <catamont-080...@ts018d06.den-co.concentric.net>
> On 8-Apr-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
> > In article <8cofa...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
> > wrote:
> > [Tavish drivel snipped]
> >
> > Public domain, Idiot.
> >
> > I didn't care one way or another about your fantasy plane. That
> > information was e-mailed to me by a total stranger.
> >
> > Send that certified check yet? Or do you want to say "bench warrant"
> > instead?
> More evidence that you have more than a casual interest in my personal
> life!
Naaaj. Like all of your victims she is amused at the spectacle of a court
ordering you to pay me to sue you.
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
The above says lots about the ethics of a lawyer who files a lawsuit in
his own name, on his own behalf, with him as the attorney and then turning
around expecting the recipient to pay him for legal fees! You are a
criminal and you are a shyster!
[...]
> The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
>Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
>deleted as the garbage that it is.
>
> Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know ...
I love how you just keep giving me more ammo. Your pal Nazihunter has
already posted a how to explaining how to get to my front door-- all only
possible because of you!
Doc Tavish
[...]
> --YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:392086f1...@news.flash.net...
> On Mon, 15 May 2000 21:50:18 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> >news:391fe645...@news.flash.net...
> >> On 14 May 2000 23:38:20 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <391f5e19...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless
Scottie
> >> >"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>You are a libelous liar Fragano! Show one and all where I have made
> >> >>death threat posts like Nazihunter has done!
>
> >> Strange that you post the same exact cut'n'patse that Sara did in her
> >> post Jeffrey! Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too!
>
> > And they are all true.
> >
> > And a coirt has ruled that already.
>
> >> I've seen it before!
>
> > And didn't showe up in court to contest the accuracy.
>
> >> Care to explain just how you two posted the same exact
> >> material? Looks exactly like an Edeiken list of charges too! I've seen
it
> >> before! How can you Nizkooks deny a conspiracy amongst you vermin?
>
> > conspiracy to protect ourselves from your violent nature?
> Still a conspiracy never the less Yale!
Only in the twisted mind of a sociopath like you.
> >> Never mind-- I didn't break the law like your pal did when he
distributed
> >> my confidential info he unscrupulously obtained using a subpoena. He
will
> >> be held responsible for his criminal act!
> > Having a court issue a subpeona is a criminal act?
> A court didn't have a subpoena issued-
Sorry, twit. A subpoena can ONLY be issued by a court.
There is the signature of the clerk on the subpoena.
> YOU had the subpoena issued on your
> own volition as stated at the bottom of the subpoena. No judge's name was
> on the subpoena-- only your:
A lie. The name of the prothonotary of the court and the seal of the
prothonotary was on the subpoena.
> "This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
> Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290"
Thank you for demonstrating that you lied again
As you nore, I requested it; the court issued it.
What is so hard for you to understand?
> > You're getting stranger by the moment.
> You're a fine one to be passing such judgment.
One a sociopathic criminbal like you, any decent person can.
> >> BTW your subject title has a threatening tone to it Jeffrey! Are you
> >> threatening me? It is plain that you are harassing me. Aren't you
> >> capable of just one independent idea or thought or are you a herd
> >> animal all the way?
> > Are you going to pay the fine that a court ordered you to pay?
> What fine? I've seen no evidence I've been fined!
You are a liar. You have recieved the order of the court.
I have the certifcation that it was mailed to you. Your buddy Blakely
had it read to him over the telephone.
> The only thing I know is
> how you are attempting to get a judge to support your extortion demands
> against me. I really liked your latest snail mail too in which you
> declared if I don't send a certified check you will have me arrested.
And the papers doing so are on the judge's desk.
> Here you are "laughing" about your extortion demand:
Actually the judge took pity on you when he ordered the sanctions. He
ignored the clear instructions of the law as the assessment of sanctions and
gave you a far lesser danction than should have been assessed.
But you are the first person I know who claims that a valid order of a
court with jurisdiction over you is "extortion."
But thank you for confirming that I did not "snap" one but gave you fair
warning before I filed with court for enforcement of its order.
Your reliance on some half-witten buffoons for legal advice has betrayed
you again.
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
Sara Salzman
<ya...@enter.net> wrote:
Oh, goody! Is this that "bench-warrant" we've all been waiting for?
Sara
--
David Christian
wrote:
>In <391f748b...@news.flash.net>, on Mon, 15 May 2000 03:58:45 GMT,
>doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> You also conveniently leave out what was said by others and you also
>> failed to notice the emoticon ":-)" which is universally meant to be said
>> in humour or tongue in cheek. You really are desperate with your
>> squealings now little sow. Squeal little sow squeal.
>
>So, if someone posts your home address and telephone number and says,
>"Kill Tavish right now :-)", that's ok with you? Doc, think!
Gord, don't be unreasonable. Think of the poor man's blood pressure.
Unacustomed exercise and all that. Very bad for such patients.
Blakely
A suggestion. Start faxing all of Yale's unsolicted to the law
office where works or send them via registered mail to his boss.
Doc Tavish
References: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
<20000514184514...@ng-ff1.aol.com>
<07716536...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>
<391f3433...@news.flash.net>
<b1fuhsgoofc1o9mcu...@4ax.com>
<391f5a8d...@news.flash.net>
<H0_T4.3271$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
<39208100...@news.flash.net>
Subject: Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Message-ID: <RN%T4.3309$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.16.153.46
On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
Lurkers please note the "news:39208100...@news.flash.net"
it's very pertinent.
>> > > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
>> >> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
>> >> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
>> > At which point it became public information.
>> It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena
> Correct. And the information was filed with a court.
And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
>> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
> Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
If that is so then why did you delete the following form the post to which
you now reply? You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
made you ol' criminal pathological lar you: "As all the recipients of the
e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like
I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top
criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
> --YFE
The above from my: Message-ID: <39208100...@news.flash.net>
Please compare the headers to see how Edeiken dodges disseminating
subpoenaed information via his personal mailing list! Why did you delete
your admission to distributing confidential information obtained via a
subpoena to your mailing list Yale?
I now ask the obvious-- what would have been the chance that Nazihunter
would have had it in his mind to check court records to get my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address as compared to you directly giving
it to him by way of him being a recipient of your e-mailing list which you
are now trying to distance yourself from having? Astronomical!
How would he have even known that confidential info such as you have
revealed would have existed?!
You won't be able to distance yourself from illegally distributing
subpoenaed information Yale. It is illegal to disseminate subpoenaed
information in the state of Pennsylvania and you know it (or you will soon
get to know it!).
Lurkers for the record again here is Yale F. Edeiken caught in three lies
about a subpoena:
[Notice that I have now tagged his lies with such "<<<LIE #1>>>"]
That's a lie.
I never did.
attempts to incite criminal harassment. <<<LIE #1>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my
civil rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now. <<<LIE #2>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000-- do you now wish to continue your
denial now that I have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal
possession Yale? Please do! I want everyone to see what a liar and
disreputable lawyer you are!))
http://x34.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=606542183&fmt=text
Subject: Re: See You In Court! ...
Date: 04/04/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cbsq...@news1.newsguy.com...
[...]
> Yale you and only you got my not in public domain information
> from Flash.Net after much duress made against them
That's a lie, criminal. <<<LIE #3>>>
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net"
"This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290"
~~End of Edeiken on the Subpoena Issue~~
You really are pathological about your lies aren't you?
Here are just two more examples of how you've been nailed about your
lying:
http://x45.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=558927630
Subject: Yale Caught in Another Whopper! Whopper #2
Date: 12/10/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 10-Dec-1999, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:38508DFF...@btinternet.com...
> > Yale F. Edeiken wrote:
> > > > > Words from Lord Haw Haw who can do nothing but goosestep around
> > > > > his own foul philosophy and cowardly actions.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't wait to spit in his eye.
Doc Tavish comments May 9, 2000-- the above is from archive
http://x29.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=558776070
Subject: Re: Andrew A. Skolnick: the journalist who
invents stories
Date: 12/09/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
"Words from Lord Haw Haw who can do nothing but goosestep
around his own foul philosophy and cowardly actions. I can't wait
to spit in his eye. --YFE"
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~
> > > > Yes, spitting at people is about your level.
> > > You lousy lying fuck.
You really are a foul mouthed toad. You are the best example that toads
can give people warts even though doctors say "taint so."
> > > It is typical of your lack of honesty of orr personal honor that
> > > you lie. Please post some evidence that I threatened to spit at you.
What do you call the statement you made above Toad? Have you already
forgotten what you "said"? You "said" above: "I can't wait to spit in his
eye."
Doc Tavish comment May 9, 2000-- I've already supplied two DejaCom
archival URLs which plainly expose Yale F. Edeiken caught in another lie
but notice how he responds to those that expose his dishonesty! What sort
of a capable attorney would make so many stupid blunders as this pathetic
oaf does?
> > > I will not deny that you deserve it for your continual lying and
> > > support of national socialism.
> > > But please produce a statement of mine that states that.
> > > Or is it just another of your anti-Semitic lies?
> > Yale, did you or did you not write: 'I can't wait to spit in his eye'? Yes
> > or no?
Don't expect Toad Edeiken to answer when he's backed into a corner.
> What of it you lying weasel?
>
> Where is the statement that I threatened to spit at you?
>
> I've had it with your lying accusations, you utter dishonesty and your
> absolute wiggling every time you are caught in a lie.
Doc Tavish replies now May 9, 2000 with an archive of your words:
http://x29.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=553525568
Subject: Re: ord Haw-Haw Shows His Duplicity
Date: 11/26/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
"...You do nothing but, Lord Haw-Haw, you are as close to a
pathological liar as you can get. Everyone here recognizes that.
You do nothing but avoid and lay down a trail of red herrings.
It is going to be a pleasure to spit in your eye.--YFE"
(Tavish comment May 9, 2000-- Look who's calling who a
pathological liar!)
> A misfortune you suffer on a regular basis.
Sounds like you describing yourself Yale. You've been caught in
plenty of whoppers lately haven't you?
> Either produce such a statment or admit that it is just another
> fabrication on your part.
Doc Tavish comment May 9, 2000-- Two DejaCom archives proves beyond
any doubt that you are nothing more than a pathological liar. You are a
god damned disgrace to the legal profession too! In fact you're a god
damned disgrace and an ugly blemish on humanity toad!
> --YFE
You really should leave the Sterno alone oaf.
Doc Tavish
~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~
http://x21.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=559908977
Subject: Re: Will I Be Lonesome Tonite?
Date: 12/12/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:38532791...@btinternet.com...
[...]
"...I am still waiting for you to stop dodging your latest adventure in
fabrication. You stated I threatened to spit on you. Although asked for
evidence for such a claim, you have refused to produce any. I put it to
you that the reason is a simple one. I put it to you that you are a lying
cocksucker. --YFE"
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://x29.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=559590092
Subject: Re: Andrew A. Skolnick: the journalist who
invents stories
Date: 12/11/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
"You are a lying cocksucker. And, lying cocksucker, I am still
waiting for somne explanation of your latest fabrication. To wit,
you claimed I threatened to spit on you. When and where, You
lying cocksucker. --YFE"
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://x29.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=559608128
Subject: Re: Yale F. Edeiken's Poor Attempt to Assault my
Free Speech. Won't Work Toad!
Date: 12/12/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:385273D1...@btinternet.com...
[...]
"...Lord Haw Haw like the llying cocksuker who fabricates charges against
other. For ewxample, you recently fabricated the charge that I threatened
to spit on you. When asked for evidence, you suddenly disappeared. I put
it to you that you are nothing but a lying cocksucker. --YFE"
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
I ask one and all who is the liar? Who is most pathological about lying?
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not say numerous times: "I can't wait
to spit in his eye."? Yes or No? How can Yale be telling the truth if he
then turns around and says: "To wit, you claimed I threatened to spit
on you. When and where, You lying cocksucker." Is not spitting in a
person's eye actually spitting on a person or is an eye a seperate
detached entity Yale?
If anyone wants a quintessential example of what a pathological liar is
they need not look any further!
Here is but one more documented lie Yale F. Edeiken made concerning
David Michael. He lied about David being the subject of a lawsuit while
at the same time calling David a liar!
http://x40.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=606558394
Subject: Re: Paul Kneisel: tell us the truth!
Date: 04/04/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> Yale F. Edeiken wrote:
>
> > david.e.michael, a/k/a Lord Haw Haw best known for his criminal
> > harassment and cyberstalking <david.e...@btinternet.com>
> > wrote in message news:38E7E0D9...@btinternet.com...
[...]
> Now, what about that lawsuit you threatened me with. Where is it?
Thank you for proving, once more, that you are a liar. You were never
threatened with any lawsuit.
Now answer the questions you lying nazi....
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~~
Proof that Yale F. Edeiken did in fact lie when he said to David Michael:
"Thank you for proving, once more, that you are a liar. You were never
threatened with any lawsuit."
http://x22.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=554666508&fmt=text
Subject: Re: For Moshe Schorr and Friends -- non-Jews and Heretics <<
Date: 11/28/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:384139EB...@btinternet.com...
[...]
> No -- with respect, you've not been reading the threads. I made a
> derogatory comment about Mr Edeiken's suitability to practise as a
> lawyer in Pennsylvania given that he has lied in public.
Which is now the subject of a lawsuit.
~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~
Need I say more about this criminal anathema to the legal system?
Doc Tavish
> --YFE
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> BTW how will you account for your continually e-mailing me against my
>> wishes, Flash Net blocking you from doing so from your enter.net account
>> and then you circumventing the block by using aol.com? Now that gives fair
>> evidence you're a stalker!
>
> Thank you for proving agian that you are an incoherent lying fuck wjho
>fantasizes conspiracies. I have never sent you anything through AOL as yu
>calim. I do not have an AOL account, have never had an AOL account, and I
>have no access to an AOL account.
> Now produce your latest forgeries so that everybody can laugh at you.
Just a sample of what started to appear in my e-mail box after Flash Net
blocked you from e-mailing me from enter.net. If this was not you then
someone forged you. Strange that these only started to appear after you
were blocked!
Here's but a few examples of many and if these aren't yours then YOU might
ought to seek out who has forged e-mail from you to me!
Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com (imo-d06.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.38])
by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26227
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:27:28 -0500 (CDT)
From: SadSac...@aol.com
Received: from SadSac...@aol.com
by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id y.3e.2a3c7bd (4532)
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:27:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3e.2a3c7b...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:27:22 EDT
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFAMATION: Re: Defendant Bradbury Spews his usual lies
To: sonn...@flash.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Mac sub 189
X-UIDL: f974ef7f68cc3d1f24a78d1c35d91a5e
> > Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
\
> > > >>Let's all see who the real "Lying Cocksucker" is!
>
> > Defendant Bradbury for one.
>
> > > >(snip)
> > > >
> > > >Nah, we're bored to death with your stupid lies.
>
> > > Can't stand the undeniable evidence can you?
> > > One more time!
>
> > That you are a liar. Nope. I love it.
> I think the following DejaCom Archives pretty well establish who
> has lied multiple times. Funny thing though you and your side keep
> deleting my proofs that you've lied in your replies!
And why don't you post the various orders of court which you have
violated.
> > That is defamatory and a retraction is demanded.
>
> Don't hold your breath waiting for a retraction from me you
> sleazy, greasy, cheesy shyster-- if the shoe fits wear it!
> BTW your DEMANDS don't mean squat to me! I don't take
> orders from KIKES like you!
Nor apparently from courts.
> Lurkers here is Ol' Sleazy Yale caught in multiple lies. See how
> many you all can count from my recent expose' on this criminal:
That is further defamation for which a retraction is demanded.
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by
utter dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts
of others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who
exposed his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation.
There is, of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
--YFE
~~End of Example Number 1~~
Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com (imo-d06.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.38])
by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA20884
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:41:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: Black...@aol.com
Received: from Black...@aol.com
by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id y.65.3588761 (9762)
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:40:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <65.358876...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:40:46 EDT
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFAMATION: Re: LORD HAW HAW: A Lying Cocksucker
(Here Is The Real Liar and a Cocksucker!)
To: sonn...@flash.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Mac sub 189
X-UIDL: eed748ecba4da19be6390a1e22d3b7c4
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:38fd165e....@news.flash.net...
> On 19 Apr 2000 01:55:54 GMT, phil...@aol.com (Philip Mathews) wrote:
>
> >In >Message-id: <jc8L4.62$fK2....@news.flash.net> wrote:
> >
> >>From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> >>Subject: LORD HAW HAW: A Lying Cocksucker
> >>
> >>Let's all see who the real "Lying Cocksucker" is!
Defendant Bradbury for one.
> >(snip)
> >
> >Nah, we're bored to death with your stupid lies.
> Can't stand the undeniable evidence can you?
> One more time!
That you are a liar. Nope. I love it.
> Here is a real example who pathologically lies. In fact this sleazy,
> greasy, cheesy shyster was caught in multiple lies!
> (All his words, in full context, and links are provided for
> verification)
That is defamatory and a retraction is demanded.
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by
utter dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts
of others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who
exposed his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation.
There is, of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
--YFE
~~End of Example Number 2~~
Received: from imo13.mx.aol.com (imo13.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.3])
by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20325
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:05:57 -0500 (CDT)
From: Crack...@aol.com
Received: from Crack...@aol.com
by imo13.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id y.99.3b5219c (4540)
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:05:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <99.3b5219...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:05:49 EDT
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFAMATION: Re: Ahem . . . er . . . Mr Edeiken?
To: sonn...@flash.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Mac sub 189
X-UIDL: e089480ac0dc9a48e7680da7b7186225
Defendant Bradbury<sonnyboy@flash/net> wrote in message
news:YnyL4.652$fK2....@news.flash.net...
>
> On 19-Apr-2000, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
> > Chris Carpenter <c.r.ca...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:38fe4859....@netnews.att.net...
> > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:30:36 -0400, Warren's All-Stars
> > > <don...@erols.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Chris Carpenter wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:28:25 +0100, "david.e.michael"
> > > >> <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I remember when someone (Moran?) said: name those 160 family
> > > >> menbers or get off the pot. He failed.
>
> > > >Au contraire. He offered to prove it in front of an impartial panel.
> > > >Mr. Moron fled. Just as you always do.
>
> > > I never flee, just put my head down and charge.
>
> > > >> Don't know if he'll reply to you either. Let's see.
>
> > > >Indeed you shall.
>
> > > >> I think he's all bluster.
>
> > > >Ask Scott Bradbury if he thinks so.
>
> He likes to abuse the legal system to intimidate those
> he dislikes.
Or, in your case, those who threaten violence with such abusive
e-mails as:
" You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
Or when you forged e-mail from me and sent it to my ISP.
> Typical low class shyster scab type lawyer.
That is defamatory.
> Has to create his own business by filing lawsuits against
> others (especially out of state)
Perhaps you should hav ethought about that before you sent deth
threats and defamation into Pennsylvania.
> in his own name, on his
> own behalf (he's out no expense and isn't inconvenienced)
> and then expects his intended victim to roll over and die and pay
> him his demands for what is called extortion.
I expect them to obey valid orders of court.
You did not and were found to be in contempt.
> > > > When you do, ask him if he's sent Yale
> > > >the certified check yet.
> NO! And he won't be getting one either! I've agreed to nothing,
You agreed to the date of the deposition.
> I've signed nothing and if he thinks I'm going to write him out
> a check then he's certified nuts!
What Defendant Bradbury does not state is that, after he failed to
appear for a deposition after having agreed to the date and without notice
sanctions were imposed by the court under their powers to punish contempt
which included legal fees, expenses, and rescheduling of the deposition.
Not only do I expect a check from him but so does the court.
> What I want to know is why his supporters think he has the
> right to make such demands from me.
Becasue a court has ordered you to do so.
> I've never agreed to his deposition
A lie. Defendant Bradbury agreed to the date and recieved both notice
of the date and an order of court setting the place where it was to be
held.
> and in fact said my medical disability precludes
> my travelling.
An apparent lie since Defendant Bradbury claims to have travelled to
Bavaria around the same time.
> He can whine and wail all he wishes but I won't
> be prey to his "extortion" demands.
"Whining" has nothing to do with it. I can and will ask the court to
find you in contempt and issue a bench warrant for your arrest.
Further they can and will impose further monetary sanctions if you
fail to appear for deposition at the time and the place they have set.
> He best better spend time figuring how he's going to defend
> himself for being an "accessory" to federal crimes. There are no
> ifs, ands, or buts in my claims against him for providing the necessary
> intelligence which has been used criminally to harass me.
There are no federal charges pending nor will there ever be.
Defendant Bradbury is just blustering.
>
> > > Why should he send him a certified check?
> > > Please post proof or go to your room.
> > Becasue a court has ordered him to do so.
> A county court which has as much jurisdiction over me
> as an Austin County Texas Court has over you!
Since you ahve been validly served, have made no objection to the
claim of jurdisdiction over you, and the court has inquired into the
matter and decided that such jurdsdiction exists as you entered
Pennsylvania and committed torts here when you sent defamatory material to
individuals in Pennsylvania and sent the following death threat into
Pennsylvania:
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
> Remember Yale I signed nothing nor did I agree to
> anything.
You agreed to the date of the deposition in a telephone conversation.
> You are the one working mischief at your end
> and sooner or later you'll get disbarred for your unethical
> cons and schemes.
You are lying again.
> You are on report to the Bar Assn for your current attempt
> to extort monies you know. I refuse to be vicxtimized any more
> by you Yale!
I'm sure the "bar association" is going to find a claim that a judge
imposing sanctions required by law is acting unethically quite amusing.
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by
utter dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts
of others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who
exposed his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation.
There is, of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
--YFE
~~End of Example Number 3~~
Strange that these three e-mails from aol.com as well as all of the rest
came only after Flash Net blocked you from e-mailing me from your
enter.net. Care to calcualte the odds that such an occurence would only be
coincidence?
Here is when Flash Net blocked you and compare the dates of the e-mailings
above!
Received: from abuse.flash.net (abuse.flash.net [209.30.0.67])
by bunyip.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA23366
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:29:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from abuse@localhost)
by abuse.flash.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA23173
for sonn...@flash.net; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:28:21 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:28:20 -0500
From: FlashNet Abuse <ab...@flash.net>
To: Doc Tavish <sonn...@flash.net>
Subject: Re: #2 Attn: Suzi Alaoui - Special Assistance Requested
Message-ID: <2000041011...@abuse.flash.net>
Reply-To: ab...@flash.net
References: <3.0.3.32.2000040...@pop.flash.net>
<3.0.3.32.2000040...@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.2000040...@popd.ix.netcom.com>; from
sonn...@flash.net on Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 07:00:26PM -0500
X-UIDL: 194a0f2c80ce82471b78dbce3823981c
Hello,
I have received your request, enter.net is on block through mail, until
their postmaster dealing with their customer.
--
Thank you,
Suzi Alaoui
Abuse Team
ab...@flash.net
~~~End of E-mail From My ISP~~~
I have more but why bother! Do you still wish to maintain your claim that
you did not e-mail me from aol.com? Who else would do so? You've lied
about everything else lately so why wouldn't you lie now? You don't want
to be proved to be a stalker too-- right?
Doc Tavish
> --YFE
Doc Tavish
References: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
<20000514184514...@ng-ff1.aol.com>
<07716536...@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>
<391f3433...@news.flash.net>
<b1fuhsgoofc1o9mcu...@4ax.com>
<391f5a8d...@news.flash.net>
<H0_T4.3271$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
<39208100...@news.flash.net>
Subject: Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Message-ID: <RN%T4.3309$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.16.153.46
On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
Lurkers please note the "news:39208100...@news.flash.net"
it's very pertinent.
>> > > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
>> >> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
>> >> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
>> > At which point it became public information.
>> It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena
> Correct. And the information was filed with a court.
And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
>> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
> Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
If that is so then why did you delete the following form the post to which
you now reply? You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
made you ol' criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients of the
e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like
I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top
criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> --YFE
The above from my: Message-ID: <39208100...@news.flash.net>
Please compare the headers to see how Edeiken dodges disseminating
subpoenaed information via his personal mailing list! Why did you delete
your admission to distributing confidential information obtained via a
subpoena to your mailing list Yale?
I now ask the obvious-- what would have been the chance that Nazihunter
would have had it in his mind to check court records to get my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address as compared to you directly giving
it to him by way of him being a recipient of your e-mailing list which you
are now trying to distance yourself from having? Astronomical!
How would he have even known that confidential info such as you have
revealed would have existed?!
You won't be able to distance yourself from illegally distributing
subpoenaed information Yale. It is illegal to disseminate subpoenaed
information in the state of Pennsylvania and you know it (or you will soon
get to know it!).
Lurkers for the record again here is Yale F. Edeiken caught in three lies
about a subpoena:
[Notice that I have now tagged his lies with such "<<<LIE #1>>>"]
http://x21.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=608403278&fmt=text
That's a lie.
I never did.
attempts to incite criminal harassment. <<<LIE #1>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my
civil rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now. <<<LIE #2>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000-- do you now wish to continue your
denial now that I have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal
possession Yale? Please do! I want everyone to see what a liar and
disreputable lawyer you are!))
http://x34.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=606542183&fmt=text
Subject: Re: See You In Court! ...
Date: 04/04/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cbsq...@news1.newsguy.com...
[...]
> Yale you and only you got my not in public domain information
> from Flash.Net after much duress made against them
That's a lie, criminal. <<<LIE #3>>>
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net"
"This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290"
~~End of Edeiken on the Subpoena Issue~~
You really are pathological about your lies aren't you?
Here are just two more examples of how you've been nailed about your
lying:
http://x45.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=558927630
Subject: Yale Caught in Another Whopper! Whopper #2
Date: 12/10/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 10-Dec-1999, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:38508DFF...@btinternet.com...
> > Yale F. Edeiken wrote:
> > > > > Words from Lord Haw Haw who can do nothing but goosestep around
> > > > > his own foul philosophy and cowardly actions.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't wait to spit in his eye.
Doc Tavish comments May 9, 2000-- the above is from archive
http://x29.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=558776070
Subject: Re: Andrew A. Skolnick: the journalist who
invents stories
Date: 12/09/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
"Words from Lord Haw Haw who can do nothing but goosestep
> > > You lousy lying fuck.
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
"...You do nothing but, Lord Haw-Haw, you are as close to a
pathological liar as you can get. Everyone here recognizes that.
You do nothing but avoid and lay down a trail of red herrings.
It is going to be a pleasure to spit in your eye.--YFE"
(Tavish comment May 9, 2000-- Look who's calling who a
pathological liar!)
> A misfortune you suffer on a regular basis.
Sounds like you describing yourself Yale. You've been caught in
plenty of whoppers lately haven't you?
> Either produce such a statment or admit that it is just another
> fabrication on your part.
Doc Tavish comment May 9, 2000-- Two DejaCom archives proves beyond
any doubt that you are nothing more than a pathological liar. You are a
god damned disgrace to the legal profession too! In fact you're a god
damned disgrace and an ugly blemish on humanity toad!
> --YFE
You really should leave the Sterno alone oaf.
Doc Tavish
~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~
http://x21.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=559908977
Subject: Re: Will I Be Lonesome Tonite?
Date: 12/12/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:38532791...@btinternet.com...
[...]
"...I am still waiting for you to stop dodging your latest adventure in
fabrication. You stated I threatened to spit on you. Although asked for
evidence for such a claim, you have refused to produce any. I put it to
you that the reason is a simple one. I put it to you that you are a lying
cocksucker. --YFE"
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://x29.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=559590092
Subject: Re: Andrew A. Skolnick: the journalist who
invents stories
Date: 12/11/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
"You are a lying cocksucker. And, lying cocksucker, I am still
waiting for somne explanation of your latest fabrication. To wit,
you claimed I threatened to spit on you. When and where, You
lying cocksucker. --YFE"
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://x29.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=559608128
Subject: Re: Yale F. Edeiken's Poor Attempt to Assault my
Free Speech. Won't Work Toad!
Date: 12/12/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:385273D1...@btinternet.com...
[...]
"...Lord Haw Haw like the llying cocksuker who fabricates charges against
other. For ewxample, you recently fabricated the charge that I threatened
to spit on you. When asked for evidence, you suddenly disappeared. I put
it to you that you are nothing but a lying cocksucker. --YFE"
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
I ask one and all who is the liar? Who is most pathological about lying?
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not say numerous times: "I can't wait
to spit in his eye."? Yes or No? How can Yale be telling the truth if he
then turns around and says: "To wit, you claimed I threatened to spit
on you. When and where, You lying cocksucker." Is not spitting in a
person's eye actually spitting on a person or is an eye a seperate
detached entity Yale?
If anyone wants a quintessential example of what a pathological liar is
they need not look any further!
Here is but one more documented lie Yale F. Edeiken made concerning
David Michael. He lied about David being the subject of a lawsuit while
at the same time calling David a liar!
http://x40.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=606558394
Subject: Re: Paul Kneisel: tell us the truth!
Date: 04/04/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> Yale F. Edeiken wrote:
>
> > david.e.michael, a/k/a Lord Haw Haw best known for his criminal
> > harassment and cyberstalking <david.e...@btinternet.com>
> > wrote in message news:38E7E0D9...@btinternet.com...
[...]
> Now, what about that lawsuit you threatened me with. Where is it?
Thank you for proving, once more, that you are a liar. You were never
threatened with any lawsuit.
Now answer the questions you lying nazi....
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~~
Proof that Yale F. Edeiken did in fact lie when he said to David Michael:
"Thank you for proving, once more, that you are a liar. You were never
threatened with any lawsuit."
http://x22.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=554666508&fmt=text
Subject: Re: For Moshe Schorr and Friends -- non-Jews and Heretics <<
Date: 11/28/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3920996d...@news.flash.net...
\
> On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> >news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
>
> Lurkers please note the "news:39208100...@news.flash.net"
> it's very pertinent.
>
> >> > > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone
calls
> >> >> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after
it
> >> >> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
>
> >> > At which point it became public information.
>
> >> It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena
>
> > Correct. And the information was filed with a court.
> And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
Liar. I have no e-mailing list.
> >> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
> > Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
> If that is so then why did you delete the following form the post to which
> you now reply?
Because your continued frantic lies are boring.
You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
> made you ol' criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients of the
> e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like
> I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top
> criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
No. It just looks like you aer challenged by the English language.
Nowe get the check in the mail Bradbury. And when you do try to
remember how you giggled to yourself -- like the sissy you are -- when you
e-mailed the following to me:
" You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
It's not as much fun now, you unspeakable piece of human waste?
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:39209392...@news.flash.net...
> On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> wrote:
> >> BTW how will you account for your continually e-mailing me against my
> >> wishes, Flash Net blocking you from doing so from your enter.net
account
> >> and then you circumventing the block by using aol.com? Now that gives
fair
> >> evidence you're a stalker!
> >
> > Thank you for proving agian that you are an incoherent lying fuck
wjho
> >fantasizes conspiracies. I have never sent you anything through AOL as
yu
> >calim. I do not have an AOL account, have never had an AOL account, and
I
> >have no access to an AOL account.
>
> > Now produce your latest forgeries so that everybody can laugh at you.
> Just a sample of what started to appear in my e-mail box after Flash Net
> blocked you from e-mailing me from enter.net. If this was not you then
> someone forged you.
It's not strange you lying fuck..
You have cobbled together forged e-mail in the past and published it as
being authentic.
It's just another of the fould tricks that got you into the deep shit
you are now in
>Here's but a few examples of many and if these aren't yours then YOU might
> ought to seek out who has forged e-mail from you to me!
I Will the next time I;m in Be3llville, Texas, home of a notorius
internet forger.
The above is a post to alt.revisionism which Defendant Bradbury clumsily
attached to an AIL header.
Get another line of luies, you mendadious twit, you
re not very good at this one.
> I have more but why bother!
You must have been up all nioght forging them.
Do you still wish to maintain your claim that
> you did not e-mail me from aol.com?
ABSOLUTELY. I have no AOL accou7nt. I have never had an AOL account.
I have no access to an OAL account. ANd if I did I would certainly not have
one issued in the bane of "Ravish."
> Who else would do so?
You.
> You've lied
> about everything else lately so why wouldn't you lie now? You don't want
> to be proved to be a stalker too-- right?
I think you need a good psychiatirc examination.
Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus notes
to others like:
" You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work
you over with an ice pick Yale!"
And then squeals like a little girl when someone fights back at your
criminal activit5ies.
The choice is yours Bradbury, a certified check or jail.
Which will it be>
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
Gord McFee
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
> On Sun, 14 May 2000 19:04:39 -0700, Blakely
> <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Nazihunter is in the chat room right now, go listen to him
> >squirm Doc.
>
> I have the Dalnet page called up but how do I get to #revisionism?
Easy. Take a deep breath, an anti-nausea pill and go for it.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org
Gord McFee
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
[...]
> Your post is a sham and you know it! You should be ashamed of yourself
> Gort and apologize. Telling lies will not save your pal from having to
> send me a nice big fat juicy check in the mail will it?
My post was verbatim from Usenet. The attribution lines are accurate.
You said what you said, Doc.
> Isn't this forging posts Gort?
See above.
Gord McFee
+0100, "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> John Morris wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > 0In <391f3433...@news.flash.net> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 14
> > May 2000 23:20:18 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Sun, 14 May 2000 15:59:31 -0700, Blakely
> > ><patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > >>Yes there is Fragano. Scott has never made a direct threat like
> > >>that.
> >
> > >>Just because you are pro-Nizkor does not give you the right to
> > >>lie.
> >
> > >More important just look at what the person making the death threat
> > >anon server left intact:
> >
> > >Path:
> > >news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!enews.sgi.com!news.eecs.umich.edu!pln-w
> > >!spln! extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
> > >From: MRS. BRADBURY <00...@mailanon.com>
> > >Subject: PLEASE KILL MY SON
> > >Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:32:08 +0000 (GMT)
> > >Organization: MailAnon Remail Service <in...@mailanon.com>
> > >Message-ID: <8fmos...@enews4.newsguy.com>
> > >NNTP-Posting-Host: p-883.newsdawg.com
> >
> > >The bottom two lines will nail him for sure. I have already sent off
> > >to NEWSGUY.COM to log the post for a subsequent investigation by law
> > >enforcement!
> >
> > I hope that is true. Nazihunter will continue to operate until one
> > of his victims actually does something to stop him.
> >
> > I suspect, however, that you enjoy the validation that comes with the
> > attention.
>
> You claim to know who he is.
>
> Shop him.
>
> But you won't.
>
> Because he's part of a double act with you.
>
> You post people's real names.
Oh, the horror!
Gord McFee
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
[...]
> You also conveniently leave out what was said by others and you also
> failed to notice the emoticon ":-)" which is universally meant to be said
> in humour or tongue in cheek. You really are desperate with your
> squealings now little sow. Squeal little sow squeal.
So, if someone posts your home address and telephone number and says,
"Kill Tavish right now :-)", that's ok with you? Doc, think!
--
Gord McFee
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
[...]
> Additional comment May 15, 2000
>
> BTW Gort do you know what the penalties are for giving false testimony or
> fabricated evidence? If the above were presented as fact it would be
> exposed as perjury once the original posts were retrieved. You side is
> surely pathetic when they have to resort to manufacturing evidence.
Doc, get stuffed. I posted your words.
Gord McFee
21:37:11 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> Jeffrey G. Brown <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:jg_brown-150...@cvg-27-166-003.cinci.rr.com...
> > In article <391f76d7...@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
> > "beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> >
> > >>Check. Certified.
> > >
> > >That's what I expect to get.
> >
> > That's what you are require to send, Gutless.
>
> You are not quite correct. He was required to do so in a specific
> amount of time.
>
> He failed to do so.
>
> Now he will have to explain to the court why he ignore its Order.
>
> It's bench warrant time.
You mean, Doc's gonna get a new jumpsuit?
JJ
"Jeffrey G. Brown" <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:jg_brown-150...@cvg-27-166-003.cinci.rr.com...
>
> > [...deletia...]
>
> >>Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
> >>will judge anybody he wishes. If he can't find a reason to condemn
> >>someone, he'll happily forge an email to supply one.
> >
> >The letter from Flash Net was not forged...
>
> So what? You have posted other forged emails -- two of them supposedly
> from myself.
>
> > [...deletia...]
>
> >>You _are_ that sad, deluded little cockroach.
> >
> >All you can do is name call when you've been bested. Judging by the
> >viciousness of your latest attacks I must really be getting to you!
>
> Cockroach Boy, you don't "get to" anybody. That's not what clowns like you
do.
>
> > [...deletia...]
>
> >>P.S. _Everybody_ laughs at you, Scottie.
> >
> >I'll bet that Yale F. Edeiken isn't laughing!
>
> _Everybody_, Gutless.
You got that right. Black humour, but humour all the same.
JJ
Doc Tavish
<39208100...@news.flash.net>
<RN%T4.3309$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
<3920996d...@news.flash.net>
Subject: ReL More Shit from Bradbury
Message-ID: <Vh1U4.3322$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 01:14:29 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.16.156.12
X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role <ab...@enter.net>,
We Care <ab...@newsread.com>
X-Trace: newshog.newsread.com 958439669 207.16.156.12
(Mon, 15 May 2000 21:14:29 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:14:29 EDT
Organization: ENTER.net (enter.net)
On Tue, 16 May 2000 01:14:29 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<Vh1U4.3322$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920996d...@news.flash.net...
>> On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>> >news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
>>
>> Lurkers please note the "news:39208100...@news.flash.net"
>> it's very pertinent.
[...]
>> And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
> Liar. I have no e-mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> >> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
>> > Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> If that is so then why did you delete the following from the post to which
>> you now reply?
> Because your continued frantic lies are boring.
Here once again:
You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
made you ol' criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients of the
e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like
I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top
criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:26:56 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
Message-ID: <385e...@news3.enter.net>
X-Trace: 20 Dec 1999 11:27:29 -0500, atmax-9-4.enter.net
Organization: Enter.Net
Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
news:faxdOHnEHgDROZ...@4ax.com...
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> >Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
> >news:J7pZOIj+KpQFqo...@4ax.com...
> >> I think it wrong to give Tavish's details to a list, (though I can understand the
> >> pressure that may have led him to do so)
(Edeiken speaks):
> > Save it for the next time you are running for office.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken did not deny giving
my details to a list as shown above. <<Lie #1 Exposed>>))
> It seems the best mitigation for your action to me.
(Edeiken speaks now in his "current" reply):
Nope. The best defense is the complete one. That it went to people
who had been victimized by Bradbury.
In fact, McVay's nonsense is just that. As all the recipients of the
e-mail except Ken knew was that there were then motions pending including
barring Bradbury from obtaining such material from me because of his
invasions of privacy and threats.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "As all the
recipients of the e-mail..." Who sent the e-mail to the list?
Yale F. Edeiken <<Lie #2 Exposed>>))
(Edeiken speaks):
> >I gave the information to a list of people who, almost without exception have
> >been the vicitims of threats of violence or criminal harassment from Bradbury. If
> >you ahve a problem with that, I could care less.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "I gave the
information to a list of people" yet he now claims: "There is no such
mailing list.." <<Lie #3 Exposed>>))
> --YFE
~~~End of Edeiken Admission to Passing Out Confidential Information~~~
The above from my: Message-ID: <39208100...@news.flash.net>
Please compare the headers to see how Edeiken dodges disseminating
subpoenaed information via his personal mailing list! Why did you delete
your admission to distributing confidential information obtained via a
subpoena to your mailing list Yale?
I now ask the obvious-- what would have been the chance that Nazihunter
would have had it in his mind to check court records to get my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address as compared to you directly giving
it to him by way of him being a recipient of your e-mailing list which you
are now trying to distance yourself from having? Astronomical!
>> You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
>> made you ol' criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients of the
>> e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like
>> I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top
>> criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
Lurkers see the text restored above.
> No. It just looks like you aer challenged by the English language.
Your words once again above liar! I count three lies you've made when one
compares your denials in the post to a previous post you've made!
> Nowe get the check in the mail Bradbury. And when you do try to
>remember how you giggled to yourself -- like the sissy you are -- when you
>e-mailed the following to me:
>" You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
You still have yet to show any headers. Words such as you quote abovew
have no validity without the headers and the way you lie your word doesn't
mean squat!
> It's not as much fun now, you unspeakable piece of human waste?
YOU never were funny psycho.
Doc Tavish
> --YFE
P.S. You were caught in three lies about your mailing list and here are
the three lies you told about how you got my confidential information.
Count the lies-- they number three!
That's a lie.
I never did.
[...]
Need I say more?
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
wrote:
----end of aol.com e-mail---
> The above is a post to alt.revisionism which Defendant Bradbury clumsily
>attached to an AIL header.
>
> Get another line of luies, you mendadious twit, you
>re not very good at this one.
>> I have more but why bother!
> You must have been up all nioght forging them.
>>Do you still wish to maintain your claim that
>> you did not e-mail me from aol.com?
> ABSOLUTELY. I have no AOL accou7nt. I have never had an AOL account.
>I have no access to an OAL account. ANd if I did I would certainly not have
>one issued in the bane of "Ravish."
>> Who else would do so?
> You.
>> You've lied about everything else lately so why wouldn't you lie now? You don't
>> want to be proved to be a stalker too-- right?
> I think you need a good psychiatirc examination.
I'm not the one who continually e-mails people against their wishes, I'm
not the one who obtains people's unlisted telephone numbers and addresses
using a subpoena and then distributes the confidential info via a mailing
list and then tell three lies about the list and three lies about the
subpoena!
> Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus notes
>to others like:
>
> " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work
>you over with an ice pick Yale!"
The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
not mean every thing you imagine comes from me. You should ask your shrink
why you would attribute the above to me when you have no proof that it did
so. This is indicative that you have some sort of a morbid obssession with
me. Once again-- WHERE ARE THE HEADERS NUT CASE?
> And then squeals like a little girl when someone fights back at your
>criminal activit5ies.
>
> The choice is yours Bradbury, a certified check or jail.
I've noted your threat Yale and it will be relayed along with this entire
post to the appropriate people. I will also include all that you see below
as it will show how credible you are! Yale's Six Lies at the very bottom.
> Which will it be>
>
>
> The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
>Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
>deleted as the garbage that it is.
>
> Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
>charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
>basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
>notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
>dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
>others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
>his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
>of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
>
> For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
>consult:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
>
>
> --YFE
I can always tell when I've caught Yale in a major lie. His typing skills
really erode! Just look at all the typos. Even his subject title is
mangled. Yale accuse me of forging those aol.com e-mails but I have news
for you-- I don't have an aol.com account either and I surely wouldn't go
to the trouble to fabricate a whole bunch of them and e-mail them to
myself to try to get you!
Doc Tavish
Yale's Six Lies
On Tue, 16 May 2000 01:14:29 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<Vh1U4.3322$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920996d...@news.flash.net...
>> On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>> >news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
>>
>> Lurkers please note the "news:39208100...@news.flash.net"
>> it's very pertinent.
[...]
>> And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
> Liar. I have no e-mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> >> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
>> > Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> If that is so then why did you delete the following from the post to which
>> you now reply?
> Because your continued frantic lies are boring.
Here once again:
You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
made you ol' criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients of the
e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like
I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top
criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:26:56 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
Message-ID: <385e...@news3.enter.net>
X-Trace: 20 Dec 1999 11:27:29 -0500, atmax-9-4.enter.net
Organization: Enter.Net
Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
news:faxdOHnEHgDROZ...@4ax.com...
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> >Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
> >news:J7pZOIj+KpQFqo...@4ax.com...
> >> I think it wrong to give Tavish's details to a list, (though I can understand the
> >> pressure that may have led him to do so)
(Edeiken speaks):
> > Save it for the next time you are running for office.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken did not deny giving
my details to a list as shown above. <<Lie #1 Exposed>>))
> It seems the best mitigation for your action to me.
(Edeiken speaks now in his "current" reply):
Nope. The best defense is the complete one. That it went to people
who had been victimized by Bradbury.
In fact, McVay's nonsense is just that. As all the recipients of the
e-mail except Ken knew was that there were then motions pending including
barring Bradbury from obtaining such material from me because of his
invasions of privacy and threats.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "As all the
recipients of the e-mail..." Who sent the e-mail to the list?
Yale F. Edeiken <<Lie #2 Exposed>>))
(Edeiken speaks):
> >I gave the information to a list of people who, almost without exception have
> >been the vicitims of threats of violence or criminal harassment from Bradbury. If
> >you ahve a problem with that, I could care less.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "I gave the
information to a list of people" yet he now claims: "There is no such
mailing list.." <<Lie #3 Exposed>>))
> --YFE
~~~End of Edeiken Admission to Passing Out Confidential Information~~~
The above from my: Message-ID: <39208100...@news.flash.net>
Please compare the headers to see how Edeiken dodges disseminating
subpoenaed information via his personal mailing list! Why did you delete
your admission to distributing confidential information obtained via a
subpoena to your mailing list Yale?
I now ask the obvious-- what would have been the chance that Nazihunter
would have had it in his mind to check court records to get my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address as compared to you directly giving
it to him by way of him being a recipient of your e-mailing list which you
are now trying to distance yourself from having? Astronomical!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here Is Yale speaking about my unlisted info being in court records:
> > > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
> >> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
> >> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
>
> > At which point it became public information.
> It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena
Correct. And the information was filed with a court.
Message-ID: <RN%T4.3309$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
>> made you ol' criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients of the
>> e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like
>> I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top
>> criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
Lurkers see the text restored above.
> No. It just looks like you aer challenged by the English language.
Your words once again above liar! I count three lies you've made when one
compares your denials in the post to a previous post you've made!
> Nowe get the check in the mail Bradbury. And when you do try to
>remember how you giggled to yourself -- like the sissy you are -- when you
>e-mailed the following to me:
>" You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
You still have yet to show any headers. Words such as you quote above have
no validity without the headers and the way you lie your word doesn't mean
squat!
> It's not as much fun now, you unspeakable piece of human waste?
YOU never were funny psycho.
Doc Tavish
> --YFE
P.S. You were caught in three lies about your mailing list and here are
the three lies you told about how you got my confidential information.
Count the lies-- they number three!
Lurkers for the record again here is Yale F. Edeiken caught in three lies
about a subpoena:
[Notice that I have now tagged his lies with such "<<<LIE #1>>>"]
http://x21.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=608403278&fmt=text
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.))
> Yale F. Edeiken is also on record as claiming that he never posted
> my private information. "
I never did.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your
attempts to incite criminal harassment. <<<LIE #1>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my
civil rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now. <<<LIE #2>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000-- do you now wish to continue your
denial now that I have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal
possession Yale? Please do! I want everyone to see what a liar and
disreputable lawyer you are!))
http://x34.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=606542183&fmt=text
Subject: Re: See You In Court! ...
Date: 04/04/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cbsq...@news1.newsguy.com...
[...]
> Yale you and only you got my not in public domain information
> from Flash.Net after much duress made against them
That's a lie, criminal. <<<LIE #3>>>
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net"
"This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290"
~~End of Edeiken on the Subpoena Issue~~
Need I say more?
Doc Tavish