Forged Post Has Been Reported and Appropriate Action Being Taken aka Re: Where's Bruno??
Tavish
submission of all other posts that I didn't take time to report. Below
the tilde barrier "~~~~" is an excerpt from COTSE's reply.
The Real Doc Tavish
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 7-Dec-1999, "Tavish" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> Path: news.flash.net!nntp.flash.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!
> news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!news.monster.org!sewer-output!mail2news
> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 13:45:44 -0500 (EST)
> Message-ID: <1999120718...@cotse.com>
> From: "Tavish" <anon...@cotse.com>
> Subject: Where's Bruno??
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Organization: cotse
> X-Abuse: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
> X-Abuse-To: ab...@cotse.com
> X-Comments: Anonymous News Web Interface - www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
> X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
> Lines: 23
> Xref: news.flash.net alt.revisionism:632965
>
> Anonymous post.
>
>
> Bruno is dancing around our bed in nothing but a jockstrap,
> carrying a Nazi flag. The Beast of Munich lives!
>
> Heil Hitler!!!
>
> It's great to be in love. Bruno, get back into bed you big
> love muffin!!!
>
>
> Bye,
>
> Doc Tavish
> (I quit that dis-sig shit because you guys are on to me!!)
~~~End Of Current Foorged Posting~~~
You are only hurting your side and you look rather immature
when you do such.
Here is partial COTSE reply to the above abuse of their service:
Received: from sofuku.monster.org (sofuku.monster.org [194.109.9.44])
by chupacabras.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11415
for <sonn...@flash.net>; Tue, 7 Dec 1999 15:07:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from abuse@localhost)
by sofuku.monster.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id WAA07482;
Tue, 7 Dec 1999 22:07:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 22:07:53 +0100 (CET)
From: ZEDZ Abuse Centre <ab...@zedz.net>
Message-Id: <1999120721...@sofuku.monster.org>
Subject: Re: Abuse of COTSE Services and Forgeries in my Name
References: <1999120721...@ogopogo.flash.net>
In-Reply-To: <1999120721...@ogopogo.flash.net>
X-UIDL: f2fa3e50856916c619bcb2b690ca5766
[13]
Q: What is your policy on forgery?
A: We have a policy against a user of ZEDZ making posts in a way
that uses the email address of another user on Usenet or the Internet,
in an attempt to deceive readers of the true identity of the poster,
without that email address owner's permission. In addition, if you are
the victim or witness to a forgery, you may want to contact the
appropriate law enforcement agency so they may then contact us and
follow-up as they feel appropriate.
This has been initiated. This is one of the examples that has been
submitted to law enforcement:
>http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=553040896&fmt=text
>From: "Tavish" <anon...@cotse.com>
>Subject: Nigger Abortions
>Date: 25 Nov 1999 00:00:00 GMT
>Message-ID: <1999112520...@cotse.com>
>Organization: Church of the Swimming Elephant
>X-Comments-2: Anonymous News
>X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
>X-Comments: This post came from an anonymous source.
>Newsgroups: alt.abortion
>X-Complaints-To: ab...@cotse.com
>I hope every nigger that wants an abortion gets one and to
>make it mandatory for the rest of them get one. Let's clear
>these niggers out of the world. Either send their black ass
>back to africa or stop them from having welfare babies.
>Let's kill these little nigger babies before they get big
>enough to arm themselves and shoot white people. PRO-CHOICE
>ALL THE WAY!! SIG HEIL! SIG HEIL!
>Cordially as always,
>Doc Tavish
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRtptdrtqb
> 1MwKmmL6vuqaFmdQda7qkwpkBddnAnNOW2fpFeaw
> 42HT0ldF+952Pbh9+q/igMJQ+2sNunEkCt3yGZGYY
>doc_t...@NOSPAMdanetwork.com
~~~End of Forged Post~~~
I will get revenge sooner or later for your inciting blacks to
harass me by e-mail. You're on federal territory now! You
WILL be ferreted out- make no mistake about it! BTW if you
were to only think about it- your very actions only make others
believe that I am justified in my dislike of your kind. You are
sneaky rat like vermin meant to be hunted down and
eliminated. :-) Just call me the Verminator!
Doc Tavish
Charles R Ward
wrote:
>
> ~~~End Of Current Foorged Posting~~~
>
Can you provide any compelling evidence that the post was foorged?
Since you use anonymous remailers, and habitually use false names, why
should any one believe that post was not from you?
Charles R Ward
William Daffer
"Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMdanetwork.com> writes:
Perhaps you should do as I currently am doing, start using a real
cryptographic system that allows you to *really* sign an article.
William
> ~~~End Of Current Foorged Posting~~~
>
- --
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
Groucho Marx.
Public Key: http://home.earthlink.net/~whdaffer/#PGP-public-key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBOE3HsCKcKc3OYUhpAQE2XAP/dtKIhq9DmJUEySUMdmU5bSuLf0x3NGpK
X0ygOLqgFvhLhhB+BILrJwEszsPV89yu8HTdYHPBglEwgl6IbvDAgg5atpl1pq/G
ehjUE1OFu7yUu+evR1AwOdV8jzjRHRHDC6dzDrOGi58BBS1igJ79539PH1R8myNm
iKF4Asxac4M=
=/K25
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
William Daffer
crw...@netins.net (Charles R Ward) writes:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 21:33:26, "Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMdanetwork.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > ~~~End Of Current Foorged Posting~~~
> >
> Can you provide any compelling evidence that the post was foorged?
> Since you use anonymous remailers, and habitually use false names, why
> should any one believe that post was not from you?
>
> Charles R Ward
Moreover, he has repeatedly ignored me when I've asked him to tell
us what message digesting system he's using to 'digitally sign' his
messages. It's beginning to look like he's just cutting-and-pasting
some likely looking gibberish to make it look like he's signing the
articles. But, digital signatures are only good if someone other
than the signator can validate the signature, and this we can not do
without information about the type of signature it is. His continued
reluctance to answer this question is becomming suggestive of evil
intent.
So, under the assumption that he's shamming the signatures, he is,
by trying to look like he's protecting his posts, in reality,
demonstrating how duplicitous he is.
I truly hope that I'm wrong about this, but if he continues to
ignore my questions, I'll be forced to conclude that he is, in fact,
forging these articles and then attempting to cast blame on others.
I know, I know..... Most of you are shaking your head and
saying... "William, how could you be so naive?" What can I
say... Hope springs eternal...
William
- --
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog,
it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx. Public Key:
http://home.earthlink.net/~whdaffer/#PGP-public-key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBOE3JdSKcKc3OYUhpAQHpYwQAgdRQYSIgczkDmk8n03M4pEN8f0sqVl2Y
FaNQcEaJ9HfqLplLMZ/VIbO2ooLUlaw3mVt4aMphjZHrI6gvns9ASFgHqHT1aux0
7fMGEaVkcS2Ht8h5Vn3WMggS2S0w+GzOIvrA3O9+4rN83RNU60Qp8VQZIDJ64EMw
lMzf2iabvP0=
=EKWS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
David Christian
<doc_t...@NOSPAMdanetwork.com> wrote :
>
>You are only hurting your side and you look rather immature
>when you do such.
Indeed, just as you did with the infamous "Israeli torture" photos.
>
>Here is partial COTSE reply to the above abuse of their service:
>
>[13]
> Q: What is your policy on forgery?
>
> A: We have a policy against a user of ZEDZ making posts in a way
> that uses the email address of another user on Usenet or the Internet,
> in an attempt to deceive readers of the true identity of the poster,
> without that email address owner's permission. In addition, if you are
> the victim or witness to a forgery, you may want to contact the
> appropriate law enforcement agency so they may then contact us and
> follow-up as they feel appropriate.
>
>This has been initiated. This is one of the examples that has been
>submitted to law enforcement:
Scottikins, they didn't use your e-mail address, you ninny.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Free thought, neccessarily involving freedom of
speech and press, I may tersely define thus:no
opinion a law-no opinion a crime.
Alexander Berkman