My rising sign
Darell
have had two different answers from different computer programs. I was
born 86 09 W and 39 46 N @ 11:31 PMGMT-5 eastern standard time, in
Indianapolis, Indiana on 7/12/1963.
Can anyone say for sure if my acendant is Aries or Pisces?
Darell
el...@no.spam
Darell <knur...@knurgnal.com> wrote:
>I have had some conficting charts drawn when it comes to my acendant.
Well aren't you special.
Keera Ann Fox
Try a third calculation: http://www.astro.com/
--
****** Keera in Norway ******
* Think big. Shrink to fit. *
http://home.online.no/~kafox
tadperry
news:3EEAAA6A...@knurgnal.com...
Gotta be Aries, right?
I mean, you seem to have initiated this whole thing, so you should know!
A Pisces ascendant would think "poor me, I don't know my ascendant" and feel
sorry for himself.
tvp
hugh jeffcoat
wrote:
Your ascendent in tropical notation = 3 ari 18
Your ascendent in sidereal notation=9 pis 04
--
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Astronomikon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Ascendant is verily the Moon, in accordance with
previously broken vows. Jupiter in ascendancy is
in superior radial motion, reigning inferior for
terrestrial Pisces the courtyard of indebtedness.
Saturn rules in Capricorn. Head of the Dragon is
for Mercury, occulted by Gemini Sun, Venus there-
by, part of Spirit is fallen by Mercury reigning
inferior. Part of Fortune in the Scorpion second
decan. Tail of the Dragon Liberated with Neptune
first decan. Note Ascendant transits the cusp at
11:24pm, just seven minutes before time of birth,
as Vertex parts from the Descendant to join Mars,
Uranus, Pluto in Leo. Saturn, Jupiter, Sun, Moon
closing the distance by radial velocity, Mercury
is nearest planet 1.329387 AU & receding malefic:
Radial Distance/v
Eart: 0.0000000~
Plut: 33.6364621-
Nept: 29.9159710-
Uran: 19.0404671-
Satu: 9.0072985+
Jupi: 4.8155845+
Mars: 1.8174246-
Sun : 1.0165828+
Venu: 1.6727162-
Merc: 1.3293872-
Moon: 0.0024875+
Node: 0.0024948+
Lili: 0.0026264+
Body. Courts. Latit. RUL. Veloc. Decans. r
Antemidhea: 0Gem00 + 0:00' | ______ _______
Venus : 5Gem35 + 0:03' [-] +1.223 16gem44 -
Spirit : 14Gem15 _______ [F] ______ 12sco45 -
/Mercury : 18Gem42 + 1:25' [R] +2.155 26lib06 -
/Sun : 19Gem37 - 0:00' [-] +0.954 28lib50 d
\True Node : 19Gem59 + 0:00' [-] +0.000 29lib57 -
Uranus : 2Leo50 + 0:44' [F] +0.050 8leo30 f
Pluto : 9Leo38 +13:22' [-] +0.024 28leo54 -
Mars : 20Leo19 + 0:39' [-] +0.581 0ari58 r
Descendant: 1Vir07 _______ | ______ _______
Vertex : 29Vir20 _______ | ______ _______ -
/MeanLilith: 5Lib13 + 4:52' [-] +0.112 15lib40 -
\Neptune : 8Lib48 + 1:48' [-] -0.007 26lib25 -
OsciLilith: 22Lib06 + 4:18' [-] +3.068 6gem18 -
Fortune : 17Sco18 _______ [-] ______ 21pis54 r
Midheaven : 0Sag00 + 0:00' | ______ _______
Saturn : 22Cap04 - 1:10' [R] -0.057 6vir13 -
/East Point: 0Pis00 + 0:00' | ______ _______
\Ascendant : 1Pis07 _______ | ______ _______
*Moon : 5Pis48 - 5:10' [-] +14.06 17pis23 -
Jupiter : 15Pis07 - 1:20' [R] +0.086 15can20 e
-adjudicated by Daniel Joseph Min 15 June 2003 AD
*Min's New & Improved Home Page (updated June 2, 2003):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0XNKAO4L3777...@Gilgamesh-frog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPuzBwZljD7YrHM/nEQLezQCgqNS36ldtsJ+ZgZHI7GCoNXKqxakAoOow
53Oa8ujgxcNqd7GqI4b2ZGPf
=6X05
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
A [Temporary] Dog
and shouted:
Only if you can clarify the time. July should be in Easter DAYLIGHT
time, not EST. I suspect that's the dificulty you had with the two
programs. When I run astrolog with the correction for EDT, I get
Pisces. If you really mean EST, I get Aries.
HTH
--
- A (Temporary) Dog |"[I]f temporality is held
The Domain is *erols dot com* | to be invalidating, then
The Name is tempdog | nothing real succeeds."
Put together as name@domain | -J. Updike
A [Temporary] Dog
Pinhead pulled on his "Astronomikon
<astron...@centre.pluton-hades>" mask painted a red bull's eye on
his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
[nothing worth repeating]
Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
<potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
--
- A (Temporary) Dog | Certified PSF / Virtual Kookhound
"Dog of Disinformation" | Guild Dog for the "We're *Not* Lost
The Domain is *erols dot com* | Damit" Tribe of Skeptics
The Name is tempdog | Official Companion Animal of
Put together as name@domain | the Black Ships
"One Small Step For A Paranormal, One Giant Leap For KookKind" -Cipher
Info
Astronomikon <astron...@centre.pluton-hades> wrote:
>
>
The Collected Buffoonery of Daniel J. Min - Usenet's most failed prophet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is Danny Min?
What does he post?
Examples of failed prophecies
What you should do
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is Daniel J. Min?
Daniel J. Min is a denizen of Usenet newsgroups. He posts using various variations on his name, including using asterisks or underlines in place of letters. Often he will post as "Nomen Nescio" or Anonymous, and he used to post as GOD>.
The reason for this is to get around peoples "kill files" or "bozo filters"
However, he consistently posts through anonymous "remailers" in order to disguise his true identity
He posts to various newsgroups, including alt.astrology, alt.astronomy, and alt.prophecies.nostradamus. He posts in any inappropriate newsgroup he deems neccessary.
Additionally Danny has been known to directly email people, once again, using his anonymous remailer service.
What does he post?
Danny posts various garbage claims about astrological influences, and birthdata, which he generally makes up as he goes along. Outstanding amongst his posts include claims to know exactly the birthdata of Jesus Christ, Johannes Kepler, Ptolemy, and various other historical characters.
He posts silly prophecies and claims, and even at times posts his own "kill file list" which has become so large that it's unlikely he even *sees* anyone else s posts anymore.
Some Classic examples of Danny's failed prophecies
(Danny's "prophetic" words are italicized)
Danny predicts the "Great Khan of Terror":
On 15 Nov 1999 22:34:03 -0600, GOD wrote in these newsgroups:
The king of terror will come some time around the month of May in 2000.
At this time, the inner planets will all be lined up on one side of the sun with the exception of the Earth which will be directly at the opposite side.
The increased gravitational effects of the sun combined with the added pull from the other planets will have a devastating effect on the earth.
At this time, all major fault lines will rupture. California will experience the big one at this time.
Volcanic activity will increase and it is very likely that the Long Valley Caulderra will explode cataclysmicly. These types of events will be occurring at roughly the same time throughout the entire planet.
To top it off, the suns corona will be nudged away from the earth...towards the grouped inner planets, effectively creating a massive coronal hole (I.E." the "three days of darkness").
When the pull of the alignment comes to pass, the corona will snap back to the earth facing side thereby releasing a CME of massive proportions....aimed directly at planet Earth.
Believe me, there will be terror at this time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny moves "The Great Kahn of Terror" by yet another 7 months:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 19:59:25 -0500, No User wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, bo...@vornet.com (BobO fficer) wrote:
>>On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:37:04 -0500, to alt.astrology et al I wrote
>>>Enjoy 1999 seventh month. It is Ethanim 2000.
>>you said it was last September or October,
Yes, the seventh month 1999 in the revised Roman calendar was from sunset September 10th to sunset October 10th but the first month 1999 was in the spring of 1762 BC, sunset Saturday March 24th to sunset April 22nd proleptic Julian. The seventh month Ethanim was therefore 2000, not of 1999 but FROM the first month in the YEAR 1999 of the passover. Hence, the YEAR 1999 seventh month AND seven months. See?
>>I let you take every day of the year 1999
>The LORD granted the centuries and you did not repent. He giveth and He taketh away. You Robert, speak blasphemy of the LORD.
>>and you were wrong.
>I am corrected by scripture--and Nostradamus was likewise.
>>there was no terror from the skies, no killer asteroid.
>And yet again must that universal ruler of infernal hades be raised up as it is written. Beware the star in fortune opposing, in the rule of night from heaven it advances to WINNOW, "Whose fan is in his hand, and he will thoroughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire" [Mat 3:12]
>>Daniel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Expects half the world's population destroyed in October 2000
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:00:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, "Douglas Deaton" wrote:
>>I am new here and somewhat ignorant.
>>Doug
That makes two of us, or 6 billion of us if I'm not entirely mistaken.
At October much will be made clear
by ways and means of the elements.
I expect half the population gone,
global equalisation of temperature
and pressure, the time, a new race,
His perpetual age the moment where,
or at the place when, smoke clears.
Enjoy the fireworks!
Daniel Joseph Min- >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel predicts the US presidential election for 2000
On 12 Nov 2000 23:44:00 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
The 42nd President of the United States is the very
last of all the American Presidents to hold office.
He will announce our *National Emergency* shortly,
thus will continue in the office of the President,
having already been inaugurated in due diligence
when he was elected President. Gore is still VP.
&There is no reason to repeal the 22nd amendment,
given that Mr. President William Jefferson Clinton
has been elected twice only, and no more, thus the
amendment does not apply. Neither does a term limit
apply in his case, given that this is indeed a true
state of emergency with bloody violence seen to be
escalating in the State of Florida and elsewhere,
spreading like wildfire as it is in the mid east.
Get to higher ground if you can (look at England!)
Daniel Joseph Min
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So what should you do about him?
Well, first of all, you can be pretty sure based on his success rate that anything he has to say is wrong.
Someone once said, rather well, that "there is too much Min, and not enough Nostradamus" in what he posts.
Complaining won't do much, because he's they type of individual that doesn't feel the need to explain himself.
Asking him to stop only feeds him.
complaining to his anonymous remailer service results in nothing.
About the best thing to be said, is just be aware of what a buffoon he is.
hugh jeffcoat
<amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:54:02 -0500, Darell <knur...@knurgnal.com>
>painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
>and shouted:
>
>>I have had some conficting charts drawn when it comes to my acendant. I
>>have had two different answers from different computer programs. I was
>>born 86 09 W and 39 46 N @ 11:31 PMGMT-5 eastern standard time, in
>>Indianapolis, Indiana on 7/12/1963.
>>
>>Can anyone say for sure if my acendant is Aries or Pisces?
>
>Only if you can clarify the time. July should be in Easter DAYLIGHT
>time, not EST. I suspect that's the dificulty you had with the two
>programs. When I run astrolog with the correction for EDT, I get
>Pisces. If you really mean EST, I get Aries.
>
>HTH
Hey DOG ! Why not use the time standard that was actually officially
in effect ? That would be EST according to all the really reliable
reference materials. Course you being an antiastroclone coward, you
probably don't need no stinking reference materials, however reliable.
hugh jeffcoat
<amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>On 14 Jun 2003 21:01:02 +0200, morphing font of ignorance Danial
>Pinhead pulled on his "Astronomikon
><astron...@centre.pluton-hades>" mask painted a red bull's eye on
>his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>
>[nothing worth repeating]
>
>Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
><potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
>instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
And you, DOG, are one of the deliberately ignorant motherfuckers
around here.
Chris Stapleton
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:37:54 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
> <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:54:02 -0500, Darell <knur...@knurgnal.com>
>>painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
>>and shouted:
>>
>>
>>>I have had some conficting charts drawn when it comes to my acendant. I
>>>have had two different answers from different computer programs. I was
>>>born 86 09 W and 39 46 N @ 11:31 PMGMT-5 eastern standard time, in
>>>Indianapolis, Indiana on 7/12/1963.
>>>
>>>Can anyone say for sure if my acendant is Aries or Pisces?
>>
>>Only if you can clarify the time. July should be in Easter DAYLIGHT
>>time, not EST. I suspect that's the dificulty you had with the two
>>programs. When I run astrolog with the correction for EDT, I get
>>Pisces. If you really mean EST, I get Aries.
>>
>>HTH
>
>
> Hey DOG ! Why not use the time standard that was actually officially
> in effect ?
Hey FAG! WHy not give us all your comments regarding your butt-buddy's
abandonment of his children?
Chris Stapleton
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:48:01 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
> <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>
>
>>On 14 Jun 2003 21:01:02 +0200, morphing font of ignorance Danial
>>Pinhead pulled on his "Astronomikon
>><astron...@centre.pluton-hades>" mask painted a red bull's eye on
>>his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>>
>>[nothing worth repeating]
>>
>>Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
>><potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
>>instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
>
> And you, DOG, are one of the deliberately ignorant motherfuckers
> around here.
Wrong.
If Dog was ignorant like Peat he'd file a stupid fucking lawsuit suing
you for saying that.
That just shows you the worlds of difference between your friends and mine.
hugh jeffcoat
Hay cretin ! Why not get some nads and tell us who you really are.
hugh jeffcoat
YOU'VE GOT FRIENDS ! SHEEIT ! Who you trying to kid ?
hugh jeffcoat
<sini...@concentric.net> wrote:
>X-No-Archive: Yes.
>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:41:47 -0700, hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:48:01 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
>><amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>>
>>>On 14 Jun 2003 21:01:02 +0200, morphing font of ignorance Danial
>>>Pinhead pulled on his "Astronomikon
>>><astron...@centre.pluton-hades>" mask painted a red bull's eye on
>>>his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>>>
>>>[nothing worth repeating]
>>>
>>>Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
>>><potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
>>>instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
>>And you, DOG, are one of the deliberately ignorant motherfuckers
>>around here.
>
>Hey, asshole! You just can't resist starting it, can you? Dog's
>post hadn't mentioned you or your crazy butthole buddy, and you jump
>in and pitch shit. You've brought it on yourself, buttboi.
>
>Just grab your ankles and wait for it. There's a good old queen.
>
>
>
>Widdershins
>
>I'm trying to see things from your point of view,
>but I can't get my head that far up my ass.
You have already said that before. Your gay fantasies are as dull as
the rest of your shit.
Patrick Humphrey
>hugh jeffcoat wrote:
>>>HTH
Hey, Big Gay Jeffy! Why not answer his question as it was asked? (I *am*
using my real name, Huge.)
--PLH, the Stapletoon-Jeffslurp tag-team of insanity meanders onward
el...@no.spam
hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote:
>YOU'VE GOT FRIENDS ! SHEEIT ! Who you trying to kid ?
Sure, huge. <patting head>
el...@no.spam
Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Hey, Big Gay Jeffy! Why not answer his question as it was asked?
Like he ever does that?
Patrick Humphrey
Given an infinite time, it'll happen. Once.
--PLH, not planning on being around that long
el...@no.spam
Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>>Hey, Big Gay Jeffy! Why not answer his question as it was asked?
>>Like he ever does that?
>Given an infinite time, it'll happen. Once.
You sure?
Patrick Humphrey
>You sure?
Given a long enough time (i.e., infinite), *everything* will happen at least
once...and Jeffy has yet to answer a question in good faith, so that event is
still ahead of us. ;-)
--PLH, QED
Chris Stapleton
Tell us all about the gay realities, then, you fucking shit-encrusted
dong slurper.
Chris Stapleton
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:48:17 -0700, Chris Stapleton
> <chr...@vodhmfs.com> wrote:
>
>
>>hugh jeffcoat wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:48:01 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
>>><amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 14 Jun 2003 21:01:02 +0200, morphing font of ignorance Danial
>>>>Pinhead pulled on his "Astronomikon
>>>><astron...@centre.pluton-hades>" mask painted a red bull's eye on
>>>>his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>>>>
>>>>[nothing worth repeating]
>>>>
>>>>Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
>>>><potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
>>>>instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
>>>
>>>And you, DOG, are one of the deliberately ignorant motherfuckers
>>>around here.
>>
>>Wrong.
>>
>>If Dog was ignorant like Peat he'd file a stupid fucking lawsuit suing
>>you for saying that.
>>
>>That just shows you the worlds of difference between your friends and mine.
>
>
> YOU'VE GOT FRIENDS !
Yes. Plural. More than one. Unlike you.
And mine are not former mental patients. Unlike yours.
The data mining on Peat has gone exceedingly well.
You're next, cocksucker.
Chris Stapleton
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:47:01 -0700, Chris Stapleton
> <chr...@vodhmfs.com> wrote:
>
>
>>hugh jeffcoat wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:37:54 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
>>><amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:54:02 -0500, Darell <knur...@knurgnal.com>
>>>>painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
>>>>and shouted:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I have had some conficting charts drawn when it comes to my acendant. I
>>>>>have had two different answers from different computer programs. I was
>>>>>born 86 09 W and 39 46 N @ 11:31 PMGMT-5 eastern standard time, in
>>>>>Indianapolis, Indiana on 7/12/1963.
>>>>>
>>>>>Can anyone say for sure if my acendant is Aries or Pisces?
>>>>
>>>>Only if you can clarify the time. July should be in Easter DAYLIGHT
>>>>time, not EST. I suspect that's the dificulty you had with the two
>>>>programs. When I run astrolog with the correction for EDT, I get
>>>>Pisces. If you really mean EST, I get Aries.
>>>>
>>>>HTH
>>>
>>>
>>>Hey DOG ! Why not use the time standard that was actually officially
>>>in effect ?
>>
>>Hey FAG! WHy not give us all your comments regarding your butt-buddy's
>>abandonment of his children?
>
>
> Hay cretin ! Why not get some nads and tell us who you really are.
Oh, I've got nads alright. But if I show you my nads all you will want
to do is tongue them, fag.
You want to know who I really am?
I'm Peat's worst nightmare. I'm his long lost conscience.
Help me out. Why not give us all your comments regarding a father's
abandonment of his children?
Don't you agree that that's a pretty fucked thing to do?
What do you think of a person so desperate to his his assets from his
kids and wife that he keeps on the move and keeps changing his Social
Security number?
Chris Stapleton
> X-No-Archive: Yes.
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 18:01:52 -0700, hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net>
> wrote:
>
> snip
>
>
>>>Hey, asshole! You just can't resist starting it, can you? Dog's
>>>post hadn't mentioned you or your crazy butthole buddy, and you jump
>>>in and pitch shit. You've brought it on yourself, buttboi.
>>>
>>>Just grab your ankles and wait for it. There's a good old queen.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Widdershins
>>>
>>>I'm trying to see things from your point of view,
>>>but I can't get my head that far up my ass.
>>
>>You have already said that before. Your gay fantasies are as dull as
>>the rest of your shit.
>
>
> You don't have to read my posts. Your lack of self control
> is indicative of your destroying brain cells by taking it up the
> ass.
>
> HTH
>
> HAND
>
> ESAD
IAWTP
A [Temporary] Dog
painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
and shouted:
>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:37:54 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
><amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:54:02 -0500, Darell <knur...@knurgnal.com>
>>painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
>>and shouted:
>>
>>>I have had some conficting charts drawn when it comes to my acendant. I
>>>have had two different answers from different computer programs. I was
>>>born 86 09 W and 39 46 N @ 11:31 PMGMT-5 eastern standard time, in
>>>Indianapolis, Indiana on 7/12/1963.
>>>
>>>Can anyone say for sure if my acendant is Aries or Pisces?
>>
>>Only if you can clarify the time. July should be in Easter DAYLIGHT
>>time, not EST. I suspect that's the dificulty you had with the two
>>programs. When I run astrolog with the correction for EDT, I get
>>Pisces. If you really mean EST, I get Aries.
>>
>>HTH
>
>Hey DOG ! Why not use the time standard that was actually officially
>in effect ?
Go back and reread what I wrote. Get some twelve year olds to help
you; they can probably talk down to your level. The standard that was
in effect in July was Eastern Daylight Time, not Eastern Standard
Time. Yet he specifically gives the birthtime as Eastern Standard
Time. It's not clear that he hasn't already made the time correction
for Daylight Time and, as I have previously indicated, that is
probably the source of his problems with inconsistent results.
Note that I was able to explain his problem and give him a result that
he can have confidence in. All you could do was give him a blind
answer that he has no more reason to trust then any of the programs
he's already tried.
>That would be EST according to all the really reliable
>reference materials.
No, that would be Eastern *Daylight* *Savings* Time, as I originally
wrote. All those years of astrology and you never even got your time
corrections straight? No surprise, really; your life must be one vast
sucking sound.
>Course you being an antiastroclone
PPOSTFU
>coward,
That reminds me. A full two months ago I remarked to you that:
"No cowards here. If there had been, rePeats lawsuit *might* have
impressed someone with something other than its pure stupidity."
You have never and will never address that remark. You may drop the
thread and run like hell, restate your false claim without providing
any evidence, or simply ignore it, but answer it you will not because
you cannot.
>you
>probably don't need no stinking reference materials, however reliable.
Naw, I knew July was Daylight Savings Time in Indianapolis without
reference to any materials. You, OTOH, maintained it was Standard
Time even after consulting your materials. Try to work on your
reading comprehension so you don't make quite as big an ass of
yourself, nextime.
--
A [Temporary] Dog
ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>X-No-Archive: Yes.
>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:41:47 -0700, hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:48:01 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
>><amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>>
>>>On 14 Jun 2003 21:01:02 +0200, morphing font of ignorance Danial
>>>Pinhead pulled on his "Astronomikon
>>><astron...@centre.pluton-hades>" mask painted a red bull's eye on
>>>his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>>>
>>>[nothing worth repeating]
>>>
>>>Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
>>><potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
>>>instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
>>And you, DOG, are one of the deliberately ignorant motherfuckers
>>around here.
Comings from Jeffy, that's praise indeed. An honest adult would be
able to provided evidence of ignorance if challenged. Jeffy, OTOH,
will never provide any evidence when challenged.
>Hey, asshole! You just can't resist starting it, can you?
I used to believe that Jeffy was just too stupid to understand what is
meant by "Let sleeping dogs lie." I'm now of the opinion that this
is a sexual outlet for him. It's his way of cruising for rough trade.
>Dog's
>post hadn't mentioned you or your crazy butthole buddy, and you jump
>in and pitch shit. You've brought it on yourself, buttboi.
>
>Just grab your ankles and wait for it. There's a good old queen.
Now that's a disgusting image.
>Widdershins
>
>I'm trying to see things from your point of view,
>but I can't get my head that far up my ass.
--
A [Temporary] Dog
<chr...@vodhmfs.com> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>hugh jeffcoat wrote:
[....]
>> YOU'VE GOT FRIENDS !
>
>
>Yes. Plural. More than one. Unlike you.
And I'm pleased that you'd consider me one of them.
--
- A (Temporary) Dog |"Astrology isn't something
The Domain is *erols dot com* |you belive in, it's
The Name is tempdog |something you meow"
http://users.erols.com/tempdog/ | -anonym(tm)
Put together as name@domain |
Chris Stapleton
THAT WAS A WONDERFUL ASS-KICKING!
A [Temporary] Dog
<chr...@vodhmfs.com> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
Well, it would have been except for one minor detail: Jizzy jeffy
didn't make himself at all clear, but it turns out that Indianapolis
has a number of odd time changes attached to it. In particular, they
didn't do daylight time in 1963. So, amazingly enough, Jeffy got that
part right. It must be a sign of the coming apocalypse.
He still did a lousy job of explaining the matter, thought, and what
he posted was useless to the original querient since it didn't have a
explanation attached to it. And he wont be able to justify his
"antiastroclone" and "coward" remarks, thought. And, after over two
months, he still wont have an actual answer for:
"No cowards here. If there had been, rePeats lawsuit *might* have
impressed someone with something other than its pure stupidity."
Maybe he'll work himself up to a good froth thought.
A [Temporary] Dog
<bobof...@earthlink.net> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 11:26:18 -0400, in alt.astrology, "A [Temporary] Dog"
><amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 00:37:21 -0700, Chris Stapleton
>><chr...@vodhmfs.com> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
>>ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:
>>
>>>hugh jeffcoat wrote:
>>
>>[....]
>>
>>>> YOU'VE GOT FRIENDS !
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes. Plural. More than one. Unlike you.
>>
>>And I'm pleased that you'd consider me one of them.
>
>I sure wouldn't want him pissed at me... :)
Damn straight, thought that's not what I meant.
--
- A (Temporary) Dog |"Why, yes, I do NCAT."
The Domain is *erols dot com* | - A(T)D
The Name is tempdog | Certified PSF
http://users.erols.com/tempdog/ |
Put together as name@domain |
hugh jeffcoat
<amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
Hey DOG:
Funny how much bandwidth you waste proving how stupid you are. Drop
your dick and get ahold of THE AMERICAN ATLAS Expanded 5th Edition by
ACS pubs. Look up Indianapolis and the answer is there in black and
white. Maby your mother will look it up for you if you get up off of
her long enough.
hugh jeffcoat
>> Naw, I knew July was Daylight Savings Time in Indianapolis without
>> reference to any materials. You, OTOH, maintained it was Standard
>> Time even after consulting your materials. Try to work on your
>> reading comprehension so you don't make quite as big an ass of
>> yourself, nextime.
>
>THAT WAS A WONDERFUL ASS-KICKING!
You sure this isn't another sock of that beknighted kookfreak mr
doobie, aka thomass roundly ? Smacks of one of his classics wherein
he was prematurely and falsely crowing about a spank that just didn't
happen. 'Course he might still be under the false impression that it
did, 'though he admitted that he was " mistaken ". It's really
difficult to tell in his case since it is obvious that his grasp on
reality is somewhat loose.
A [Temporary] Dog
Lack of evidence noted. I take it you're conceding the point.
>>
>>>coward,
>>
>>That reminds me. A full two months ago I remarked to you that:
>>
>>"No cowards here. If there had been, rePeats lawsuit *might* have
>> impressed someone with something other than its pure stupidity."
>>
>>You have never and will never address that remark. You may drop the
>>thread and run like hell, restate your false claim without providing
>>any evidence, or simply ignore it, but answer it you will not because
>>you cannot.
As I *predicted - no answer from Jeffy.
>>
>>>you
>>>probably don't need no stinking reference materials, however reliable.
>>
>>Naw, I knew July was Daylight Savings Time in Indianapolis without
>>reference to any materials. You, OTOH, maintained it was Standard
>>Time even after consulting your materials. Try to work on your
>>reading comprehension so you don't make quite as big an ass of
>>yourself, nextime.
>
>Hey DOG:
>
>Funny how much bandwidth you waste proving how stupid you are.
Naw, I just proved that I can be useful even when I'm wrong, but that
you're perfectly useless even when you're right. Without an
explanation, which you did not provide, Darell had absolutely no
reason to believe your answer.
>Drop
>your dick
Unlike you, I type with both hands.
>and get ahold of THE AMERICAN ATLAS Expanded 5th Edition by
>ACS pubs. Look up Indianapolis and the answer is there in black and
>white.
See message ID <tjipevgrkfpe0s911...@4ax.com>
As always, you're a day late and buck short. Must suck to be you.
>Maby your mother will look it up for you if you get up off of
>her long enough.
Ah, that famus Jeffcoat wit that has them rolling in the isles. Pity
that they're laughing *at* you and not with you.
BTW, since you seem to be avoiding the question, here it is again:
>>>coward,
>>
>>That reminds me. A full two months ago I remarked to you that:
>>
>>"No cowards here. If there had been, rePeats lawsuit *might* have
>> impressed someone with something other than its pure stupidity."
>>
>>You have never and will never address that remark. You may drop the
>>thread and run like hell, restate your false claim without providing
>>any evidence, or simply ignore it, but answer it you will not because
>>you cannot.
--
Chris Stapleton
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 11:37:32 -0700, Chris Stapleton
> <chr...@vodhmfs.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Naw, I knew July was Daylight Savings Time in Indianapolis without
>>>reference to any materials. You, OTOH, maintained it was Standard
>>>Time even after consulting your materials. Try to work on your
>>>reading comprehension so you don't make quite as big an ass of
>>>yourself, nextime.
>>
>>THAT WAS A WONDERFUL ASS-KICKING!
>
>
> You sure this isn't another sock of that beknighted kookfreak mr
> doobie, aka thomass roundly ? Smacks of one of his classics wherein
> he was prematurely and falsely crowing about a spank that just didn't
> happen. 'Course he might still be under the false impression that it
> did, 'though he admitted that he was " mistaken ". It's really
> difficult to tell in his case since it is obvious that his grasp on
> reality is somewhat loose.
Sort of like your bowels after you take it up the ass by a young black buck.
hugh jeffcoat
<amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
.
>
>Ah, that famus Jeffcoat wit that has them rolling in the isles.
>
Hay, DOG, what is a "isles" ?
Chris Stapleton
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:51:21 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
> <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
> .
>
>
>>Ah, that famus Jeffcoat wit that has them rolling in the isles.
>>
>
> Hay, DOG, what is a "isles" ?
>
Spelling lames. How gay.
John Griffin
"House Widdershins" <sini...@concentric.net> wrote
> hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote:
> >"A [Temporary] Dog" <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
> >>
> >>Ah, that famus Jeffcoat wit that has them rolling in the isles.
> >>
> >Hay, DOG, what is a "isles" ?
>
> What a maroon.
>
> Widdershins
>
> If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
I'm beginning to think Jeffcoat is stupid. I must have overlooked that
before, because his articles are so dull and uncreative that I seldom
read them. How could he have missed the point like that? His "wit"
obviously doesn't have anyone rolling in anything, neither the aisles
nor the isles. Does he really think people who live on isles don't roll?
Does he think that butt ugly old hag "The Queen" lives in The British
Aisles? Too bad he didn't know how to spell "famous." He could
have made some really stupid remarks about the typo.
Chris Krolczyk
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:48:01 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
> <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
> >Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
> ><potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
> >instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
> And you, DOG, are one of the deliberately ignorant motherfuckers
> around here. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You misspelled "more accurate critics of astrokooks". HTH. HAND.
Oh, and it's nice to know you're ignoring Min's continued kookery,
huge. Nice set of allies you've picked.
-Chris Krolczyk
hugh jeffcoat
Glad to know that you read my posts so meticulously. What an exciting
life you must have !
hugh jeffcoat
Krolczyk) wrote:
I haven't picked anybody, 'specially kooks like ewe. I just post what
I want to and there aint a thing assholes like you can do about it !
('cept whine whine whine..)
Chris Stapleton
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 03:16:07 -0700, "John Griffin"
> <thathi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>"House Widdershins" <sini...@concentric.net> wrote
>>
>>>hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"A [Temporary] Dog" <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Ah, that famus Jeffcoat wit that has them rolling in the isles.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hay, DOG, what is a "isles" ?
>>>
>>>Oh, look! It's a grammar lame. "An isle," Huge. Not "a isle."
>>>What a maroon.
>>>
>>>Widdershins
>>>
>>>If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
>>
>>I'm beginning to think Jeffcoat is stupid. I must have overlooked that
>>before, because his articles are so dull and uncreative that I seldom
>>read them. How could he have missed the point like that? His "wit"
>>obviously doesn't have anyone rolling in anything, neither the aisles
>>nor the isles. Does he really think people who live on isles don't roll?
>>Does he think that butt ugly old hag "The Queen" lives in The British
>>Aisles? Too bad he didn't know how to spell "famous." He could
>>have made some really stupid remarks about the typo.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Glad to know that you read my posts so meticulously.
He just said he seldom reads them, you jiz-encrusted cocksucker.
Chris Stapleton
> On 16 Jun 2003 08:24:24 -0700, chrisk...@hotmail.com (Chris
> Krolczyk) wrote:
>
>
>>hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote in message news:<gj5nevoe2en2ms2vv...@4ax.com>...
>>
>>>On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:48:01 -0400, "A [Temporary] Dog"
>>><amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>>
>>>>Please ignore MINibrain and see Message-ID:
>>>><potmev8nhvrl7ae59...@4ax.com>
>>>>instead. Min's one of our resident kooks.
>>
>>>And you, DOG, are one of the deliberately ignorant motherfuckers
>>>around here. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>You misspelled "more accurate critics of astrokooks". HTH. HAND.
>>
>>Oh, and it's nice to know you're ignoring Min's continued kookery,
>>huge. Nice set of allies you've picked.
>>
>>-Chris Krolczyk
>
> I haven't picked anybody, 'specially kooks like ewe. I just post what
> I want to
Which is 100 percent Idiocy.
Chris Krolczyk
> >You misspelled "more accurate critics of astrokooks". HTH. HAND.
> >Oh, and it's nice to know you're ignoring Min's continued kookery,
> >huge. Nice set of allies you've picked.
> I haven't picked anybody,
Except Peat, of course. So when are you and your apparent
domestic partner adopting, huge?
> 'specially kooks like ewe.
Ah. You're calling *me* and Dog kooks. How...droll.
> I just post what
> I want to and there aint a thing assholes like you can do about it !
> ('cept whine whine whine..)
I'm scarcely whining, huge. I'm mocking you. Figured out the
difference yet?
-Chris Krolczyk
hugh jeffcoat
And gave you another opportunity to display your prejudiced hatred.
hugh jeffcoat
Krolczyk) wrote:
>hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote in message news:<f6trevk8npopr2abh...@4ax.com>...
>> On 16 Jun 2003 08:24:24 -0700, chrisk...@hotmail.com (Chris
>> Krolczyk) wrote:
>
>> >You misspelled "more accurate critics of astrokooks". HTH. HAND.
>
>> >Oh, and it's nice to know you're ignoring Min's continued kookery,
>> >huge. Nice set of allies you've picked.
>
>> I haven't picked anybody,
>
>Except Peat, of course. So when are you and your apparent
>domestic partner adopting, huge?
>
>> 'specially kooks like ewe.
>
>Ah. You're calling *me* and Dog kooks. How...droll.
>
>> I just post what
>> I want to and there aint a thing assholes like you can do about it !
>> ('cept whine whine whine..)
>
>I'm scarcely whining, huge. I'm mocking you. Figured out the
>difference yet?
>
>-Chris Krolczyk
The difference is that your definition is self serving, mine is the
truth.
A [Temporary] Dog
painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
and shouted:
>On 16 Jun 2003 15:02:22 -0700, chrisk...@hotmail.com (Chris
>Krolczyk) wrote:
>
>>hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote in message news:<f6trevk8npopr2abh...@4ax.com>...
>>> On 16 Jun 2003 08:24:24 -0700, chrisk...@hotmail.com (Chris
>>> Krolczyk) wrote:
>>
>>> >You misspelled "more accurate critics of astrokooks". HTH. HAND.
>>
>>> >Oh, and it's nice to know you're ignoring Min's continued kookery,
>>> >huge. Nice set of allies you've picked.
>>
>>> I haven't picked anybody,
>>
>>Except Peat, of course. So when are you and your apparent
>>domestic partner adopting, huge?
>>
>>> 'specially kooks like ewe.
>>
>>Ah. You're calling *me* and Dog kooks. How...droll.
>>
>>> I just post what
>>> I want to and there aint a thing assholes like you can do about it !
>>> ('cept whine whine whine..)
>>
>>I'm scarcely whining, huge. I'm mocking you. Figured out the
>>difference yet?
>>
>>-Chris Krolczyk
>The difference is that your definition is self serving, mine is the
>truth.
So by your definition, laughing at you is whining?
--
John Griffin
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 03:16:07 -0700, "John Griffin"
> <thathi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"House Widdershins" <sini...@concentric.net> wrote
> >> hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote:
> >> >"A [Temporary] Dog" <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>Ah, that famus Jeffcoat wit that has them rolling in the isles.
> >> >>
> >> >Hay, DOG, what is a "isles" ?
> >>
> >> Oh, look! It's a grammar lame. "An isle," Huge. Not "a isle."
> >> What a maroon.
> >>
> >> Widdershins
> >>
> >> If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
> >
> >I'm beginning to think Jeffcoat is stupid. I must have overlooked that
> >before, because his articles are so dull and uncreative that I seldom
> >read them. How could he have missed the point like that? His "wit"
> >obviously doesn't have anyone rolling in anything, neither the aisles
> >nor the isles. Does he really think people who live on isles don't roll?
> >Does he think that butt ugly old hag "The Queen" lives in The British
> >Aisles? Too bad he didn't know how to spell "famous." He could
> >have made some really stupid remarks about the typo.
> >
> >
> >
> Glad to know that you read my posts so meticulously. What an exciting
> life you must have !
Beautiful. I overestimated you when I decided you're stupid.
Apparently the reason your posts are so dull and uncreative is
that you can't read and therefore have no hope of ever being
able to write anything worth reading. Just to show you what a
nice guy I am, I'll mention that "seldom" and "meticulous" are
not synonymous. You'll have to look up "synonymous" for
yourself.
Mr. Doobie
<snippage for spacage>
> And gave you another opportunity to display your prejudiced hatred.
Oh, this from Mr. Race Lames. Kind of like when he accuses me of plagiarism
so often my reply is now a sig file:
--
I remain curious as to what you call it
when RePeatster cuts and pastes
screed verbatim from a sidereal astrology
web-site.
Chris Stapleton
Yes, I am prejudiced and don't have a lot of love for lying scumbag
hypocritical, scamming assholes such as yourself. The fact that you like
to swig man-chowder just makes it funnier.
Now, speaking of prejudice, what were you saying to Bob Officer the
other day? Something pretty racist.
Chris Stapleton
> On 16 Jun 2003 15:02:22 -0700, chrisk...@hotmail.com (Chris
> Krolczyk) wrote:
>
>
>>hugh jeffcoat <jef...@ableweb.net> wrote in message news:<f6trevk8npopr2abh...@4ax.com>...
>>
>>>On 16 Jun 2003 08:24:24 -0700, chrisk...@hotmail.com (Chris
>>>Krolczyk) wrote:
>>
>>>>You misspelled "more accurate critics of astrokooks". HTH. HAND.
>>
>>>>Oh, and it's nice to know you're ignoring Min's continued kookery,
>>>>huge. Nice set of allies you've picked.
>>
>>>I haven't picked anybody,
>>
>>Except Peat, of course. So when are you and your apparent
>>domestic partner adopting, huge?
>>
>>
>>>'specially kooks like ewe.
>>
>>Ah. You're calling *me* and Dog kooks. How...droll.
>>
>>
>>>I just post what
>>>I want to and there aint a thing assholes like you can do about it !
>>>('cept whine whine whine..)
>>
>>I'm scarcely whining, huge. I'm mocking you. Figured out the
>>difference yet?
>>
>>-Chris Krolczyk
>
> The difference is that your definition is self serving, mine is the
> truth.
You wouldn't know the truth it it came splattering out of the tip of one
of those cocks you like to suck.
hugh jeffcoat
<thathi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
ooooo and ewe are sooooo cleaver !
hugh jeffcoat
<chr...@vodhmfs.com> wrote:
Now all you have to do is prove that statement, LAZYWEENIE !
Chris Stapleton
Which part, you ugly old queen?
>LAZYWEENIE !
I can imagine a lot of guys get "lazy weenies' when they see you're the
one who wants to suck 'em.
Chris Stapleton
How many names and social security numbers have YOU gone through?
How many people who stopped and lived at 7220 Rector Creek Road never left?
Are there any bodies buried on that property?
el...@no.spam
Chris Stapleton <chr...@vodhmfs.com> wrote:
>Hey Hugh!
>How many names and social security numbers have YOU gone through?
Inquiring minds want to know!
Chris Krolczyk
> >I'm scarcely whining, huge. I'm mocking you. Figured out the
> >difference yet?
> The difference is that your definition is self serving, mine is the
> truth.
Nice attempt at sophistry, huge. My definition of *what*?
-Chris Krolczyk
Chris Krolczyk
More than you, apparently.
I really would cease with the use of "ewe:, huge. It could
come off as an advocacy of Suspicious Fun with Sheep, eventually.
-Chris Krolczyk
hugh jeffcoat
Krolczyk) wrote:
It doesn't matter what anyone posts, you turn it into a chance to
display your sexual frustrations. Your problem is that you are a
textbook case of a closet human being.
hugh jeffcoat
Your problem is that you are an astoundingly venal hypocrite, and an
apologist to a scumbag like Peat Stapleton. Which is not to say you're
not a scumbag yourself, of course you are.
Does Pete call you and cry for help when his manic depression doesn't
allow him to post?
Or does he call you in a suicidal panic, and your best choice to help
him is to post lame shit on Usenet?
Have you EVER chided Pete about abandoning his children? What about him
makes you love him so much? What did he ever do for YOU?
Chris Krolczyk
> It doesn't matter what anyone posts, you turn it into a chance to
> display your sexual frustrations. Your problem is that you are a
> textbook case of a closet human being.
"Closet human being"?
Huge just gets stupider and more obscure with every post.
-Chris Krolczyk
el...@no.spam
Chris Krolczyk <chrisk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Huge just gets stupider and more obscure with every post.
And I didn't think that was possible.
Chris Krolczyk
I suppose it's a shared quality of usenet fucknuts that they
always manage to *surprise* you with the depth of their idiocy.
-Chris Krolczyk