Why Psychiatry Does Not Face Scientology
Leonardo Been
5 December 2003
(for the intended Usenet newsgroup)
The courageous Tory "Magoo" Christman does not want to know, that
her life's bad condition is CAUSED by L. Ron Hubbard.
So, her leaving the cult of L. Ron Hubbard, is not enough:
Now she still has to face the being L. Ron Hubbard and what he
did to her to cause her condition (and that of others).
Of course her condition, or that of Michael Pattinson, or that of
Mark Ingber or Guillaume Lesevre, etc. etc. etc. can not possibly
be handled by or inside the cult of L. Ron Hubbard:
If you would have to face the damage, inflicted on your
soul by Satan, you would not go to Satanology to get it
repaired, would you!
But that is the route John Travolta and Tom Cruise have
consciously chosen to remain in and even to publicly
promote - and they can not claim,
as a life time before them equally the architect
Albert Speer or the movie director Leni Riefenstahl
could not claim it about the form that 'Satanology'
had taken then, as 'Hitlerology' to command all its
people and to want to govern the world that way too,
(Nazism, as it is called officially),
that they "have not been informed about the dark side of
Scientology."
But you WOULD go to 'Scientology' - excuse me, to Satanology, in
order to NOT FEEL your condition, by being immersed in and numbed
and blinded by its Energies.*(1)
Or you would, as many did, go to 'Scientology' because the
imposter L. Ron Hubbard used much of the Energy stolen from me
to make people feel that "what he said was true and caring."
In other words, people went there where they expected, where
they felt to find me, and they felt that it was me who had
found the answers for them to use, that is was me who was
caring for them.
You can see that Energy, that Energy-mask of the imposter
L. Ron Hubbard, in the photo by Gerry Armstrong of Gerry's
wedding party.
So the "accusations" of the 'Scientologists,' controlled by
L. Ron Hubbard, against psychiatry are very true:
Psychiatry does not at all face Hubbard, but
in fact, in very sad and horrifying fact indeed,
psychiatry does all and everything to make people
NOT face the
(past life, and present, Energy - I still have to
add that, for the complete charlatans and quacks
and kooks, who also want that others do NOT FACE
the)
evil of L. Ron Hubbard - excuse me, of Satan I mean of
course, because we are not only talking about his last-
known incarnation as L. Ron Hubbard.
And so the "attack" by 'Scientologists,' by L. Ron Hubbard, on
psychiatry, is a typical example of a 'double lie,' and of the lies
of the Eternal Criminally Minded:
It is a 'self-proving' lie - as there are so many of such lies
that you are believing, because they "are so true."
(Example of criminals "proving the truth" about you)
A thief steals your money, and then this criminal,
who is still undetected by you, (he) accuses you,
"very truthfully" of course, that "YOU can not
handle money." But "HE can handle money," as
"evidenced" by the fact that he has (now) money and
you have none.
And then he even "proves to you,"
(other example)
or to the population of India - to stay
with the current news headlines about
the most monied people on Earth - or of
Africa, or of China,
(end of other example)
"how kind and caring and good he is" by giving YOU
just enough to make you feel grateful for his
"helping you out in your difficult situation" in
which, he says, "no one else would have helped you
so well."
(End of example)
The truth is, that psychiatry is not at all facing the evil
inflicted by Hubbard on people now at present and in the future
Energetically, and in the past, including in people's past lives
in which he caused people to suffer now.
And to THAT extent, psychiatry is indeed completely incompetent and
fully ignorant, and highly destructive:
The only cure and life-saving measure for Lisa McPherson would
have been,
not to put her under drugs, and not to tell her that "she
does it all to herself," and not that "her brain has the
wrong chemicals," and not to tell her other things that
PREVENT her from facing the cause of her spiritual and
deadly travail, but
TO GET HER AWAY FROM AND OUT OF ANYTHING CONNECTED IN ANY WAY
WITH SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS OR (WHICH IS THE SAME) IN
ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH NOT FACING L. RON HUBBARD.
And THAT is the fault of psychiatry, as I have written now in so
many ways, and here I have written it from the viewpoint of the
readers of 'alt.religion.scientology' - for lack of a proper
newsgroup-name.
Once again being of immense intelligence, understanding and service
to you, I remain,
Leonardo etc. Been
'Once you have flown,
you will walk the earth
with your eyes turned skyward,
for there you have been,
there you long to return.'
Leonardo da Vinci
*(1) See References
__________
References:
- 'Understanding Eternal Criminally Minded Individuals'
(24 November 2003) {HRI 20031124}
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0311240851.34352064%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
- 'Behind The 'Scientology' "Definition Of 'Clear'"'
(6 November 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.0311061042.2b8adc%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
- 'How To Detect Scientologists - How To Prevent Subversion And
Infiltration And Destruction Of Your Person And Of The Society'
(15 October 2003 - issue 2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.0310150914.3dc65dfc%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
- 'Understanding The Origin Of Evil (Version 1.1) {HRI-20031025-V1.1}
(25 October 2003 - V1.1 on 3 Nov 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0311031326.5e88f9bb%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
arnie lerma - www.lermanet.com
wrote:
>Why Psychiatry Does Not Face Scientology
>
>
Damn, thats a VERY good Koos Knolst Trenite imitation
Of course he was completely whacko...
Repasted for propogation:
On 05 Dec 2003 00:27:32 GMT, rookie...@aol.com (Rookie1122Rk)
wrote:
>Is this Barbara Schwarz for real with her beliefs?
>
Pasted from another thread which was followed by a pile of toot
squweaker posts, and definitely applies here
On 05 Dec 2003 00:27:32 GMT, rookie...@aol.com (Rookie1122Rk)
wrote:
>Is this Barbara Schwarz for real with her beliefs?
>
Scientology has an established pattern of conduct
for covert operations
Crazy, erratic, nutballs provide a suitable guise for
operations desired by scientology.
Bums were used to harrass Lisa Gibson at her work place
when she was staying here a few years ago,
One of those 'bums" was seen being picked up by brand new rental car
after an incident.
I mean, if a person is obviously crazy as a loon, how could one
"prove" it was working for or manipulated by OSA? contrived or
apparant "insanity" is a perfect disguise.
Unless of course, one had physical evidence....
All covert operations are run so there is no evidentiary connection
to scientology available.
For example, a raving lunatic who is willing to say that they talk
to spirits or channels L Ron Hubbard and are a seer makes a perfect
operative and suitable guise for scientology covert operations
http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn/ops.htm
A document seized in the FBI Raids:
This really needs to be Studied and read very well by participants in
the expose-the-true-nature-of-scientology effort
OPERATIONS OFFICER
Successful:
(1) Allowing outer Org B1s to develop their own Ops ideas to submit
for approval -- and demanding such.
(2) Allowing outer Org B1s to run approved Ops based on first hand
data as long as it's kept within the framework of the Op.
(3) Providing a believable source of an operation, thereby filling the
vacuum, so that Scn. isn't dubbed in as source.
(4) When planning an Op, mentally following it all the way through
looking for areas which need to be taken into account; and
taking the enemy's viewpoint of the Op for the same purpose.
(5) Full and correct use of target series for each Op. Targets simply
stated and specific as possible. (Helps in debugging and to hat
inexperienced persons)
(6) The major target of the Op is based on a *real*, current
situation.
(7) When hitting a group or individual, hitting their finance and comm
lines.
(8) Getting an enemy to attack another enemy.
(9) Working off of programmes which align Ops actions to other Br 1
sections and other Bureaus and which contain command intention
from LRH on down. (Admin scale and priorities aligned)
(10) Working for VFPs and having such reflected in the statistics,
rather than a lot of sub-products.
(11) Exposure of real, documented enemy crimes and material of a
scandalous nature.
(12) Utilizing current events and trends (and finding the right
buttons) for exploitation in Ops channels.
(13) Keeping plans bright and simple and on target.
(14) Finding real buttons.
(15) Keeping up persistent pressure until the product is achieved.
(16) Establishing some type of feedback line so that exact effects are
known.
(17) Mini-hatting by giving examples of successful Ops.
Unsuccessful:
(1) Ops on random attackers instead of WHOs, just to be doing Ops for
Ops sake.
(2) Dubbing in buttons.
(3) Trying to do everything on an Op by yourself from a management or
senior executive level, and therefore not allowing origination
or juniors to wear their hats.
(4) A one shot approach, rather than persistent pressure and several
channels to a product.
(5) Harassment actions.
(6) Not planning or providing for a believable source of the Op so
that a vacuum is left allowing the recipients to dub in Scn amongst
others.
(7) When planning not considering all the effects as the Op runs it's
full course, and not taking the enemy's viewpoint, leaving
critical holes in the plan which will later backfire on you, make your
scramble on an emergency basis to handle or make the Op less
effective.
(8) No use of, or misuse of, target series. (too few, unspecific
targets; many unaligned, hard to understand targets).
(9) An Op or major target based on revenge or out-of-PT situation.
(10) Producing, and stats aligned with, many sub-products as opposed
to VFPs.
(11) Manufacturing documented enemy crimes (there are rare exceptions
to this)
(12) Long involved and overly complex operations with many
conditionals which if any or any one of several aren't done exactly
would cancel out the effectiveness of the Op. (There are rare
exceptions)
(13) No feedback line; results of Ops not really known or dubbed in.
# # # # #
DATA NEEDED BY OPS ON EACH LOCATED WHO
1. Standard ODC with time track and a brief, summarized, well-rounded
picture of a terminal. (Following #2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 are the key
areas
data is needed)
2. Criminal background of terminal.
3. Financial involvements (inflow & outflow of money)
4. Legal involvements (summary of actions)
5. Terminal's main interests, personal habits, fears, vices and any
other items of interest.
6. Friends and enemies on the terminal's 1st Dynamic
Friends and enemies on the terminal's 2nd Dynamic
Groups that the terminal belongs to and any groups or terminals,
who are enemies of that group.
7. What the terminal considers valuable & is protecting
8. Simple org board the terminal is on, clearly noting his position
and his seniors and noteworthy juniors.
9. What persons have the power to fire terminal from the position he
holds.
10. Any rules or regulations that if broken would cause the terminal
to lose his job/position.
11. Any regulations concerning licenses that the terminal holds that
would cause him to lose his license if violated (i.e. law,
medical, contractor, etc.)
12. Scandals, conflicts, disputes directly or indirectly connected to
terminal.
13. Documents that show criminality of terminal (i.e. cheating on
income
tax, discrediting data in personal letters, use of drugs, etc.)
14.
15.
Ops Planning
Ops planning goes over all the data on the WHO that Ops research has
compiled and with all the data available on the WHO, plans out
channels of attack on the WHO that will effectively remove/restrain
the WHO from his position of power. Ops planning on a WHO is done
using the data series, target series, all Scientology tech applicable,
and intelligence tech.
The following points should be followed in doing an operation:
1. Initially plan out at least 3 channels of attack with the data you
have at hand. Do not wait forever to getall data collected, but
also do not run Ops that would be dangerous without essential
data. Basically a brighter idea is needed with less data
available. 3 channels being done instead of less is because there is
a higher percentage of getting results and also this will tend to
confuse and spin the WHO as there are 3 attacks instead of just one.
2. Continue to plan Ops utilizing feedback from completed Ops so that
the WHO has persistent attack on him and continual pressure. Do
this consistent attack until the WHO is obliterated.
3. Stay away from harassment actions that are only for the sake of
doing channels or revenge. ie: Sending pizzas from every Pizza
delivery restaurant. These basically have been unsuccessful as they
do not achieve any real effective result, except for letting the WHO
know that he is under attack. There may be times when 50 pizzas every
day being sent to a WHO would be effective, but this would be in such
a case where the WHO was restimulated heavily by seeing pizzas,
smelling pepperoni or seeing pizza delivery boys, etc.
4. Always include a way of getting feedback in an operation, so you
know what type of result you are getting and for further planning of
channels in those areas that give good results.
5. Ensure proper security is planned in an operation, ie: use of an
untraceable typewriter, paper without fingerprints, proper
covers by FSM's, etc. (See security write-up and security section data
in hat materials of Ops US hat checksheet)
6. Use the target series exactly to programme out an operation on a
WHO.Ensure the major target is based on a *real*, current situation
and is an achievable purpose.
7. Find out what the exact resources are for the area the Op will be
implemented in and what the capabilities are of your terminals
implementing the Op.
8. Keep the targets in an operation simple, yet complete.
9. Analyze properly the actual situation with the WHO and what the
best line of attack should be done by the GO as a whole. It may be
necessary to suggest that PR or Legal do some specific action as a
finishing off of the WHO. Never wait for another bureau to handle a
WHO, as Ops is responsible and has the capabilities to handle
WHO's totally without the other Bureaus in the GO. Liaison though is
very important with the various GO bureaus, specifically the Legal
Branch 2 (attack area of Legal) and PR Branch 1 (attack area of PR).
10. A believable source must be provided in an operation, thereby
"filling the vacuum," so that Scientology isn't dubbed in as
source of the attack. A1 Ops are planned in such a way that they in
no way could be traced back to the Church.
11. Channels should be various and ever changing types of channel of
attack, rather than sticking to one type of Op, such as an
anonymous flyer that 3-P's a WHO.
12. Mentally follow-thru your plan and ensure all factors concerning
security and workability are taken into account. It is a good
idea to also take the enemy's viewpoint when working out your
strategy in the operation.
Once the plan is fully targeted out, CSW with full complete data your
operation to the Dir Br1 US. When it is approved, then the Ops plan
and the applicable data is flowed to Ops execution part of the Ops
section.
Ops Execution
Ops execution implements the targeted-out approved operation. If an
AGI in the field is to receive the targeted plan or orders to do a
part of the operation then this is routed in the following manner:
Branch 1 Director US
DG I US
Ops mail line
AGI _______
_________________
OPS OFF US
The "Ops mail line" is a point where the Ops targets are mailed
directly on a confidential line directly to the Ops terminal in
the field. (See the attached Ops Write-up 1R and the attached
write-up of the US Ops Com-Lines)
Flexibility is important when doing a targeted out plan. An operation
should not be done robotically, as at times an Operation can be found
to be unworkable for any number of different reasons. As execution
observes the PT scenes of the Op and obtains feedback, it may be more
applicable to re-CSW new actions or alter targets because of threat of
exposure of the Op, etc.
Execution gets the Operation implemented and acts as Ops programmes
officer, 8-Cing Ops units to get the necessary targets done and
debugging bogged targets. Execution works very close to planning in
that the necessary PT scene of the Op with feedback of the results is
immediately infoed to Ops planning, so new channels can be drawn up or
revised as necessary.
Ops execution ensures that the stat and report lines are in from his
Ops units implementing the operation. (Ops Write-up 2R and 3
attached)
------
Now this above is the ilk that claims to be a religioin?
I don't think so.
Arnie Lerma
http://www.lermanet.com/LRonHubbard4.htm
I'd prefer to die speaking my mind than live fearing to speak.
The only thing that always works in scientology are its lawyers
The internet is the liberty tree of the new millennium
Secrets are the mortar binding lies as bricks together into prisons for the mind
Support http://www.lermanet.com - mentioned 4 January 2000 in
The Washington Post's - 'Reliable Source' column re "Scientologist with no HEAD"
arnie lerma - www.lermanet.com
wrote:
>Why Psychiatry Does Not Face Scientology
>
>
Who wants to lift the tail of a skunk?
( quote from a police detective in canada about Scientology)
Why Scientology chases disaster victims
L Ron Hubbard advocated the equivalent of "ambulance chasing" in his
policy,
The reason he did this, was that when he was at norfolk hospital at
the end of WWII he read a manuscript that had been written by a
visiting clinical psychiatrist named William Sargant.
Sargant, a "PSYCH", described how the biggest discovery by Pavlov was
made by accident.... when the Volga river was jammed by an ice floe,
and the rising waters flooded the laboratory, the dogs, who had been
conditioned in various ways.... some to salivate when given a
miniscule electric stimuluous through their front paws.... found
themselves swimming at the tops of their cages to escape drowning.
The terrified dogs were saved when one of his assistants arrived and
to pull the terrified dogs down under the rising ice water, and out
the cage door and then out of the room.
Pavlov observed that most of his dogs LOST their prior conditioning,
and sometimes reversed their loyalties.. The keeper they used to love
, they now barked at.. the one they hated they now fawned upon.
Lenin used Pavlov's work to build the control mechanisms for
COMMUNISM.
Stalin expanded upon those techniques to build his gulags and stazi
police forces.
Hubbard used Pavlov's same discovery to build an empire of money and
greed.
This observation is what created the rational for "SHOCK" treatments
of all kinds, whether it was skydiving,, electric shock, ice water
baths, or torture ... or as Roger Gonnet describes above, a bridge
collapsing causing injury...
SHOCK from sufficient physical or mental trauma, causes a mental
reboot of the mind's operating system.
Hubbard knew from SARGANT that he could cause victim's of disasters
and accidents, to 'reboot' running HIS mind control system... This is
called "COVERSION".
And that is why Scientology chases accidents and ambulances...
Because SHOCK therapy works..
and that is why Scientology DEMONIZES psychiatry and the writer of
this missive, because he did not want you to ever find out how the
trick was done.
SIncerely
Arnaldo Lerma
Ex-financial manager for what is now Scientology's Bridge publications
See WWW.Lermanet.com EXPOSING the CON
6045 N 26th Rd
Arlington VA 22207
Read William Sargant's "Battle for the MIND"
more on sargant:
http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/scientologyandcommunism.htm
http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/hubbard2percentrule.htm
Secrets are the mortar binding lies as bricks together into prisons
for the mind
Support http://www.lermanet.com - mentioned 4 January 2000 in
The Washington Post's - 'Reliable Source' column re "Scientologist
with no HEAD"
Truth about the truthseekeer nick -
http://www.lermanet.com/osa/osawhoiswho.htm
Yesterday in Hemet California, just outside GOLDEN ERA. the
international management headquarters for the global racket that does
a brisk business in fraud and scams dba Scientology, Ms Ida Camburn
http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn/
baked 200 Snickerdoodles and there was NO bomb threat investigation!
Compare this non-event to one of the last times Ms. Ida Camburn baked
a large batch of snickerdoodles:
Keep off Mom’s Front Porch
http://www.lermanet.com/scientologyscandals/keepoffmomsfrontporch.htm
By Arnie Lerma
Sunday, February 23, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Saturday, there was picket of Tom Cruise's old romping grounds,
Scientology's Golden Era facility in Hemet . In an effort to
intimidate participants into not picketing, an elaborate ruse was
concocted by Scientology's dirty-tricks production team, OSA, The
Office of Special Affairs, the same department of Scientology that
brought you OPERATION FREAK OUT; the 1970's set-up of author Paulette
Cooper, whose parents died in Auschwitz.
Paulette had published a book, The Scandal of Scientology.. and
Scientology was going to "MAKE IT GO RIGHT" ( The supreme test of a
Scientologist per Hubbard) to make sure you and I never read it. They
framed her so well for a bomb threat that the Federal Government spent
a great deal of money successfully prosecuting her, and doing for
Scientology what Scientology could not do for itself through 16 or
more prior lawsuits: Silence and discredit a little girl with the
heart of lion, who saw in Scientology that same sort of evil that had
killed her own parents.
It was not until 1977, years later, that the FBI and IRS raided
Scientology, carting off loads of documents. One day a document was
discovered. It was an actual copy of ONE of the plans used to frame
Ms. Cooper, which in part caused the government to pursue its
conviction with such enthusiasm. The operation was called OPERATION
FREAK OUT. Which was also an apt description of the induced mental
state of Ms. Cooper after years of civil and criminal harassment.
On Saturday, an infamous agent, employee and dirty tricks private
investigator named Edwin Richardson appeared on 79 year old Ida
Camburn's doorstep, feigning to want to make peace, so that Ms.
Camburn would not make a "cake bomb". Scientology's Richardson was
accompanied by a member of the Hemet Sheriff's office, who was not
quite sure what to make of all of this or exactly why he was there.
Well let me try to connect the dots for you in this confusing saga of
what may be multiple nested deceptions.
This elaborate frame job was based upon a February 19th posting by a
nick "A...@newsguy.com", who replied to an unremarkable posting about
possible pickets of upcoming L Ron Hubbard birthday events with this
corker: "Any[o]ne know how to safely plant a pipe bomb in a sheet
cake?"
This posting was then replied to by a nick called "Miscreant critic""
on Friday the 22nd, using an anonymous remailer service called xganon.
I am convinced that Miscreant critic is a highly placed official in
Scientology’s office to handle the Internet. His previous targets have
been those people who have survived many prior attempts to silence
them, including litigation, refused offers of a gag for money, and in
general the folks Scientology considers their biggest enemies, myself
included. "Miscreant critic" attempts to concoct an elaborate
conspiracy to physically attack Scientology using a 79 year old
grandmother in Hemet California as a base of operations. The Miscreant
posting is piece of fiction which is quite comparable to the story of
Xenu as a science fiction thriller.
The Hemet sheriff’s deputy told Ms. Camburn that he just "happened" to
be at Scientology’s base in Hemet on other business when this was
brought to his attention. The posting by "Miscreant" vanished from
many news server’s right after it was posted making it difficult to
locate, but not so difficult it wasn’t available for Edwin Richardson
to print out and conveniently show to the Sheriff, who just "happened"
to be there "on other business."
The picket, although short, did go off without incident. So what was
accomplished? At best, an elderly lady was harrassed, and the Hemet
sheriffs dept was unwittingly used by Scientology to harrass her in
hopes of quashing a few American Citizen’s constitutionally guaranteed
civil rights to demonstrate their outrage in front of a criminally
convicted cult of madmen that a french prosecutor asked, just last
week, be thrown out of Paris.
Will anyone care that Ms Camburn herself was deposed as a hostile
witness in one of Paulette Cooper’s cases by Scientology using the
excuse that she possessed a few copies of The Scandal of Scientology?
Will Scientology’s latest real life science fiction thriller become a
Federal case? Or will Scientology settle for possibly just a memorable
keynote speaker’s contribution to Riverside DA Grover Trask’s
re-election campaign fund. Grover Trask has already proven himself to
be Riverside county’s resident authority on Tom Cruise Missiles in his
recent theatrical starring Keith Henson, who used to picket
Scientology in Hemet.
Or do we just have another Scientology self-inflicted foot bullet of
truly epic proportions.. you see, the infamous "There's more to Ida
than meets the eye" Camburn never bakes CAKES, however she is famous
throughout the valley for her snickerdoodles... Now.. *if* their
allegations included something about a plot to launch dozens of Tom
Cruise Snickerdoodle Missiles.. Scientology might be onto something,
however considering the size of Tom Cruise's snickerdoodle, even when
he is within sight of the leader of Scientology, the mastermind of
this caper, David Miscavige, even this nefarious plot might be easily
mistaken for no more than bird droppings.
http://www.lermanet.com/scientologyscandals/keepoffmomsfrontporch.htm
Leonardo Been
inflicted on anyone, and also on him, by the Criminal Minds he
seeks to stop:
This condition is described with the most tenderly loving and
immensely caring understanding, in:
'Understanding Eternal Criminally Minded Individuals'
(24 November 2003) {HRI 20031124}
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0311240851.34352064%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
But the respondent has been fiercely mind controlled* to firmly
believe of himself, that he already "knows everything that he needs
to know,"
("he knows everything there is to know" is the mind control
phrase)
and so he will not read it, BECAUSE it will make him aware of being
mind controlled
- and will free him of much mind control and agony too, if he
creates the Energy to desire to understand what I wrote.
In fact, he can indeed not speak his mind, even if he
would rather die for it.
He has, as most anyone has it, received the basic of all
mind control - very strongly too - that "he is not mind
controlled."
I described that condition very excellently and very
clearly in 'Fine Particle Physics.'**
And so, the respondent - as so many others - is refusing to discuss
that what he does not know, and - he has been bereft of the Life
Energy for even the desire to know what he so sorely is lacking.
To hide his condition, as some others with him, he resorts to one-
syllable words, in order to express his mental helplessness.
Thus he again fails to speak his mind,
which - as he does know, and knows since many life times -
is a long-term and fatal mistake of his, that he now
frantically attempts to avoid, with at least some short-
term, and certainly highly appreciated success.
Once again I remain to you - on a very long-term basis too - the
most truly caring and the most truly loving,
Leonardo etc. Been
'Solomon's wisdom was greater
than the wisdom of
all the men of the East,
and greater
than all the wisdom of Egypt.'
1 Kings 4:30
_________
Footnotes:
* 'The Mafia Code Against Mankind (Version 2.0)
- {HRI 20021018-V2.0}' (18 October 2002 - V2.0 on 10 October 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0310101357.3ecabe19%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
** 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent
Psychotics' (27 Feb 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0302271444.1b9b5a4f%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
Truth Seeker
wrote:
>Why Psychiatry Does Not Face Scientology
>
> 5 December 2003
>
> (for the intended Usenet newsgroup)
>
>The courageous Tory "Magoo" Christman does not want to know, that
> her life's bad condition is CAUSED by L. Ron Hubbard.
>
> So, her leaving the cult of L. Ron Hubbard, is not enough:
Wrong! Tory hasn't left the Church of Scientology. She just taken
a new role in Scientology. She's a "Xenu" Scientologist, which means
she an undercover agent for Scientology. I've read that "Xenu" was L.
Ron Hubbard's undercover name, but not 100% sure.
Truth Seeker
"OSA Stands for: (O)perations by (S)uppressive (A)ssholes"
=====================================================
If you want to know what Scientology doesn't want you
to know, take a look these posts that I've put up earlier on
this newsgroup. (That's if the Church of "Suppress Free Speech"
hasn't illegally cancelled them)
"How to spot the OSA members on this newsgroup"
"How you know you've just read phony criticism created by Scientology"
"Scientology's Plan to Stop Critics & Criticism on this newsgroup"
"The key to how Scientology is handling this newsgroup"
"Why you should stay away from Scientology"
"The FAQ for Alt.Religion.Scientology"
"Names Scientology is Posting by on this newsgroup"
"Tactics OSA uses to stop critics on this newsgroup"
"The Magical Transformation of Church Member into Critic"
"How Scientology is playing both sides of the coin"
"Scientology's Decoy System"
"The 3 beliefs Scientology wants the world to believe"
"Some different Ways to "Handle" Scientology"
"How Scientology Traps New Members"
"Scientology's Trick to keep people from REAL criticism"
"Weaknesses of the Church of Scientology"
"How Scientology creates identity confusion"