Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Beyond Doubt: Taylor IS Stanford Wallace!!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 6:04:04 AM2/24/02
to
It looks to me like someone has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that
"Taylor Jimenez" is a complete fraud and an anonymous coward IN TOTAL
AFTERALL!!! Shares many characteristics with fat ass Spamford Wallace:
personality, interest in LART, apparent hostility towards gays, the way
he looks, domains, libelous tendencies... Isn't that just about
everything????

SO THE COWARD IS OUTED. AND THE PROOF IS ON THE RECORD FOR ALL TIME!!!

I might note, that this means all "Taylor's" domains are falsely registered.

Not only do they have the false 666 Lart Ave. address, but about everything
about the registrations are false. WHY SHOULD HE BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THEM?

This above is what I believe anyway. BITE ME. "TAYLOR" HAS LOST ALL CREDIBLITY
AND ALL RESPECT. He is in so much trouble in so many ways, it is beyond
belief!!!


Peter

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 6:25:36 AM2/24/02
to
In message <85ae8923b86d6f29...@remailer.privacy.at>,
Anonymous <nob...@remailer.privacy.at> writes

>It looks to me like someone has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that
>"Taylor Jimenez" is a complete fraud and an anonymous coward IN TOTAL
>AFTERALL!!! Shares many characteristics with fat ass Spamford Wallace:
>personality, interest in LART, apparent hostility towards gays, the way
>he looks, domains, libelous tendencies... Isn't that just about
>everything????

I'm puzzled. Please lay down an unbroken chain of inductive reasoning,
starting from Spamford and ending with Taylor.

Just for shits and giggles, you understand.

>SO THE COWARD IS OUTED. AND THE PROOF IS ON THE RECORD FOR ALL TIME!!!
>
>I might note, that this means all "Taylor's" domains are falsely registered.
>
>Not only do they have the false 666 Lart Ave. address, but about everything
>about the registrations are false. WHY SHOULD HE BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THEM?
>
>This above is what I believe anyway. BITE ME. "TAYLOR" HAS LOST ALL
>CREDIBLITY
>AND ALL RESPECT. He is in so much trouble in so many ways, it is beyond
>belief!!!

I still see no evidence.
--
Peter

Master of The Inverted Placebo

Iceman

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 2:07:00 PM2/24/02
to

What a dufus.

You just keep going and going and going, like a bad braddery!

More slander, libel, and intent to defame. Based on your lack of
knowledge, assumptions, and illogical mind.

unknown

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 6:26:44 PM2/26/02
to

"Just Taylor" <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:a5gjpg$kja$4...@astroconsulting.databasix.com...

> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:04:04 +0100 (CET), Brad Jesness
> <nob...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
> >It looks to me like someone has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that
> >"Taylor Jimenez" is a complete fraud and an anonymous coward IN TOTAL
> >AFTERALL!!! Shares many characteristics with fat ass Spamford Wallace:
> >personality, interest in LART, apparent hostility towards gays, the way
> >he looks, domains, libelous tendencies... Isn't that just about
> >everything????
>
> Geez Brad, you really are one stupid git. First off, Sanford Wallace
never
> owned NetScum.net, he hosted it for Collin James III, John Grubor and
Steve
> Boursey, who created and maintained the original NetScum archive.
>
> NetScum.net went down on 10/16/97 when Cyberpromo lost his connection for
> good and went out of business. NetScum.net was off-line for about three
> years until I bought it from NetZero in 2000.

Lies. Active as your mirror site before then.


>
> All this is easily verifiable on the web if you spent more than five
seconds
> looking up what NetScum.net was actually about and not some stupid WHOIS
> from 1997.
>
> Why did you not post this to news.admin.net-abuse.email? That is the
group
> where Sanford was known most. There are tons of people who would just
love
> to laugh at your idiocy there. Of course, I bought them all off so....

yeah, right.

>
> >SO THE COWARD IS OUTED. AND THE PROOF IS ON THE RECORD FOR ALL TIME!!!
> >
> >I might note, that this means all "Taylor's" domains are falsely
registered.
> >
> >Not only do they have the false 666 Lart Ave. address, but about
everything
> >about the registrations are false. WHY SHOULD HE BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN
THEM?
>

> Why are you and RtS so hard up for my address? Planning on doing some R/L
> harassment as well? Its right up your alley.

Well scumbag, if the shoe fits, wear it. In your mouth. It seems you like to
dish it out plain enough but can't stand the heat when it goes your way.


>
> >This above is what I believe anyway. BITE ME. "TAYLOR" HAS LOST ALL
CREDIBLITY
> >AND ALL RESPECT. He is in so much trouble in so many ways, it is beyond
> >belief!!!
>

> And we get back to the main point that always bothers both you and RtS.
> Nobody likes you. Nobody wants you around. Nobody believes a word you
two
> say.

I think we can say same about you, scumbag. Any one can see that at
www.lart.com/

>
> Everybody likes me. Everybody wants me around. Everybody believes what I
> say when I'm not trolling.

I'll just bet the cops love having you inside a jail cell every day.

>
> Just deal with it Brad. You will never be me no matter how much you try
or
> get your little boyfriend to pretend with your sick perverted games you
two
> play.
>

Some one, some day, will find out who you are, scumbag. We'll come knocking
on your door and the first person you make eye contact is going to be MOI!
Deal with it.

John Kimball

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 11:59:51 AM2/27/02
to
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:26:44 -0600, "unknown" <so...@wise.guy> wrote in
Message id: <u7o6dcg...@corp.supernews.com>:

>
>"Just Taylor" <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
>news:a5gjpg$kja$4...@astroconsulting.databasix.com...

[...]

>Some one, some day, will find out who you are, scumbag. We'll come knocking
>on your door and the first person you make eye contact is going to be MOI!

So IOW, bring a barf bag.

>Deal<SLAP>

STFU pedophile.


--
begin trash harddisk.vbs
I'm a signature virus. Copy me! Look here why:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/2/30.ASP
end

0 new messages