Sanford Wallace: Head of KOOK CaBAL Exposed!!!
Nomen Nescio
It is absolutely obvious that the false name "Taylor Jimenez" could
have been generated/identified by a computerized coding/renaming program
from the name, Sanford Wallace.
There is no question about it. NONE. Read on:
There IN FACT **IS** a orderly relationship between all the consonants
In "Sanford Wallace" and all those in "Taylor Jimenez" AND there
is an orderly relationship between all the vowels!!
On the left the Sanford Wallace consonants and on the right those of
"Taylor Jimenez":
Note: One consonant from first name and one from last is +1 one, then
otherwise
2 names letter switches show 2 different patterns: Details:
From first name 'Sanford' for "Taylor":
d - 5 = y
n - 2 = l
r - 0 = r
s + 1 = t
(incrementing pattern CHANGE -1, -2, -3, going from plusing 1 to plusing 0
(-1 increment change)
then to plusing -2 (-2 increment change from previous)
then to plusing -5 (-3 increment change from previous))
c (unmatched; 'Sanford' shorter than "Taylor" by one consonant)
From 'Wallace' (plus one consonant from Sanford) FOR "Jimenez":
l + 1 = m
l + 2 = n
w + 3 = z
f + 4 = j
(pattern: plus 1, plus 2, plus 3, plus 4 -- all increments are +1 more
THAN the last)
(those are all the consonants in "Taylor Jimenez")
Now vowels:
The vowels in the first names Taylor and Sanford are the same.
The vowels in Jimenez are one vowel away from the vowels in Wallace
That is The 2 "a"s in Wallace become "e"s and the "e" becomes an "i"
I could write the program that does this myself!!!!
Me
And I could surely figure out some obscure sequence of calculations
that convert my name to Mickey Mouse and write a program for that.
What's your point?
John Smith
"Me" <no_ad...@x-ray.gs> wrote in message
news:ohjaku07be8d4sq7o...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
> <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> >FACT (undisputable!!!):
> >It is absolutely obvious that the false name "Taylor Jimenez" could
> >have been generated/identified by a computerized coding/renaming program
> >from the name, Sanford Wallace.
> >
> >There is no question about it. NONE. Read on:
Sheesh. I hate to say this, but this kind of crap is just idiotic.
Anybody can play the numbers game to come up with any conclusion they like.
How do you account for the fact that Wallace has double letters while
Jimenez does not?
Wallace is 2 syllables and Jimenez is 3.
Now of course, taking that logic, you could claim that Bullis = Wallace.
Pronouncing Wallace as Wallis, change the Wa to Bu and voila!
I wonder how many other possibilties of the name game there are using that
idiotic logic.
Brad, if that's your doing, you're really playing the role of don quixote
for sure.
Find another windmill to fight.
0gre
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Daniel Min is so stupid he can't even fool Richard the St00pid!
Hmm, RtS failed to fall for something. Does this mean the Apocalypse is nigh?