donald fisher set to die
Matthew
home and away.
cya flat head!
Matthew
Emma Grant
news:bsirvtk6m5c78f46i...@4ax.com...
> This week Fisher will find out about a disease that will kill him on
> home and away.
>
> cya flat head!
<kidsinthehall>
No *you're* the flat head - I'm crushing your head! I'm crushing the head!
</kidsinthehall>
You absolute twat.
emma
fly.to/flourella
Lofts
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
Don't you think a spoiler warning would have been nice for the people
that watch H&A Matthew?
Chris Mayer
> cya flat head!
>
> Matthew
Explain your way out of this one, fuckwit troll?
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>This week Fisher will find out about a disease that will kill him on
>home and away.
>
>cya flat head!
What a lame troll. Not one spelling mistake or Goodyear-ism to be
seen.
--
Trev.
The difference between a bad Hollywood movie and a bad foreign movie is that
in the Hollywood one, the explosions at least keep you awake - Gregg Araki
Lofts
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:08:33 -0800, the following from Matthew
><matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
>and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>
>>This week Fisher will find out about a disease that will kill him on
>>home and away.
>>
>>cya flat head!
>
>What a lame troll. Not one spelling mistake or Goodyear-ism to be
>seen.
Does having the wrong date count as being a Goodyear-ism?
zaphy
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
[spoiler snipped]
>cya
>
Way to include spoiler space, trollboy..
--
zaphy..
The Meerkat
wisdom before the assembled droogs:
>This week Fisher will find out about a disease that will kill him on
>home and away.
>
Geez, just being on Home and Away should do the job, no need for a
disease.
Adam
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:31:47 +1000, zaphy
> <toddmc...@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:08:33 -0800, Matthew
> ><matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
> >
> >[spoiler snipped]
> >
> >>cya
> >>
> >
> >Way to include spoiler space, trollboy..
>
>
> Ok..sorry..i should talk about American programmes right? I forgot
> that in aus.tv that Aussie programmes are frowned upon :(
Fucking hell, give it up. You know damn well what you did wrong.
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> Well, if i had the choice of having a guaranteed high rating
> Australian television show earning $3200 a week or sitting at home
> watching American soaps and collecting $400 a fortnight on the dole..
> i know which choice i would make.
What a pity you don't have a choice, dole boy...
--
The ideas expressed in the above post are my own, with the possible
exception of the one involving a scarecrow and a stick of butter.
blog - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/infinitebabble/
cyberfuddle - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/
learn HTML - http://smiley.vh.mewl.net/markhtml/
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> eh?
>
> Im a troll for reporting what happens on an Australian tv programme??
>
> Sorry, i thought this was a group about aussie tv and for discussing
> home and away < alt.tv.home-and-away >
You were deliberately posting a spoiler. Worse, you posted it for a
soapie (y'know, the crappy shows that people only watch for the
*surprises* you've just robbed them of).
Idiot.
Adam
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:04:01 +1100, Spooky Guy Next Door
> <mgall...@cyberfuddle.com> wrote:
>
> >You were deliberately posting a spoiler. Worse, you posted it for a
> >soapie (y'know, the crappy shows that people only watch for the
> >*surprises* you've just robbed them of).
>
> preview an episode for next weeks whatever?
>
TV stations don't put the ad on every break. TV guides don't put the news on
the front cover. Matthew Goodyear posts a message with the wrong date so it
stays on top and everybody can see it. Purely to piss people off, no doubt.
Alex
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:31:47 +1000, zaphy
> <toddmc...@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:08:33 -0800, Matthew
>><matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
>>
>>[spoiler snipped]
>>
>>>cya
>>>
>>
>>Way to include spoiler space, trollboy..
> I was talking about an aussie tv programme and you call me a troll?
> Ok..sorry..i should talk about American programmes right? I forgot
> that in aus.tv that Aussie programmes are frowned upon :(
Do you even _read_ the messages you reply to? Where does the phrase
"Way to include spoiler space, trollboy.." indicate that you can't
discuss an Australian show? Maybe posting spoilers without spoiler
space doesn't make you a troll, but it does make you an inconsiderate
arsehole. Your choice...
Alex.
--
"Sometimes I just feel like giving this whole thing up and just writing a
musical...I've got a story...Jack the Ripper."
"As a MUSICAL?"
"So he's an anti-hero! I've got a title: Love Hurts."
- Zachary and Beatrice ("The Wanderer")
Adam
> pathetic really.
>
So how DO you explain your trip to the future, Matthew? It takes 20 seconds
to fix the system clock. Do it now. How many times does this have to be
pointed out to you?
RMG
> This week Fisher will find out about a disease that will kill him on
> home and away.
>
> cya flat head!
Oh great. I haven't watched it in weeks, and was looking forward to seeing
it next week, and now I find THAT out.
Katharine S
> >Fucking hell, give it up. You know damn well what you did wrong.
> >
>
>
> Nope.
>
>
> It was on tv, in two magazines, one newspaper.
So what?
The fact is you included spoilers in a post, with no warning, let alone
spoiler space, plus, even worse, in the subject!
Whether it's appeared in other media is irrelevent (btw this was the first
I'd heard of it).
--
Katharine S.
spamblock in action
Katharine S
"Dean Hollister" <de...@blackhole.mushka.cx> wrote in message
news:3bfceafa$1...@news.wa.apana.org.au...
> Matthew <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> writes:
>
> >Tell that to the tv week, tv soap, newspapers, tv stations..etc etc.
>
> Not everyone *reads* those publications.
Agreed. This was the first I'd heard of it.
> The TV stations would not release
> a major spoiler like that, they'd only hint at something.
Not necessarily true.
Katharine S
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:13:30 GMT, Alex <al...@leng.zip.com.au> wrote:
> >Do you even _read_ the messages you reply to? Where does the phrase
> >"Way to include spoiler space, trollboy.." indicate that you can't
> >discuss an Australian show? Maybe posting spoilers without spoiler
> >space doesn't make you a troll, but it does make you an inconsiderate
> >arsehole. Your choice...
>
> Sorry, i didn't read it in the Charter..
> :(
It's called basic netiquette. It's also been discussed in this newsgroup,
and probably any other media-related newsgroup you've ever read. There's no
way you're not aware of the issue of spoiler space (let alone putting it in
the subject!), so either fess up as doing it on purpose to piss people off,
or admit that you did something stupid and let these threads end. Either
way, by continuing in this manner, you're just digging yourself a deeper
hole!
Alex
>>Do you even _read_ the messages you reply to? Where does the phrase
>>"Way to include spoiler space, trollboy.." indicate that you can't
>>discuss an Australian show? Maybe posting spoilers without spoiler
>>space doesn't make you a troll, but it does make you an inconsiderate
>>arsehole. Your choice...
> Sorry, i didn't read it in the Charter..
> :(
Um, what has a charter got to do with it? Spoiler space is one of the
basic courtesies in any newsgroup. Maybe you'll be wanting to take a
break from posting for a while until you learn a bit more about using
Usenet responsibly...
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> Never tell me what to do if you expect me to take any notice of you.
That attitude, right there, explains why you're such a bad typist, have
such little regard for the niceties of grammar, and refuse to accept
netiquette[0].
> My clock says Nov 22nd.
What year? What timezone? What *time* in comparison to everyone else in
*your* timezone (not the timezone you've set it to)?
[0] Yes, okay, you're QA-posting[1]. But you're quoting too much (inc.
sigs a lot of the time) or too little (many unattributed snips),
trolling, using the "detached from reality" "defence"[2], constantly
avoiding killfiles, and refusing to stop touching your cock... er,
clock.
[1] Which is more than most aus.tvers can do.
[2] I think we can all agree it's bloody annoying to have someone do
that, and not at all as clever as you think it is.
zaphy
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
>It was on tv, in two magazines, one newspaper.
So? There's no need to repeat their wrong-doing here.
--
zaphy..
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:11:52 +1100, Spooky Guy Next Door
> <mgall...@cyberfuddle.com> wrote:
>
> >> Never tell me what to do if you expect me to take any notice of you.
<snip />
> have
> >such little regard for the niceties of grammar,
> you should continues that sentence by adding"....in newsgroups"
Perhaps.
> >[0] Yes, okay, you're QA-posting[1]. But you're quoting too much (inc.
> > sigs a lot of the time) or too little (many unattributed snips),
> > trolling, using the "detached from reality"
>
> Show me in my ISPS TOS where i must follow certain snippage rules and
> i promise you i will stick to it.
Many ISPs require you to follow the rules set out in a newsgroup (though
only a few will term someone for refusing to obey them).
But, in any case, what does an ISP's TOS have to do with netiquette? You
don't follow netiquette because your ISP tells you to. You do it because
you don't want people to see you as a dickhead out-of-hand.
> "defence"[2], constantly
> > avoiding killfiles,
>
> No, i dont put back in my settings in the exact manner they were once
> before.
> If that pulls me out of a killfile, then so be it. It is quite simple
> for someone to pop me back in there.
Oh sure, the constant formatting.
<snip />
> >[1] Which is more than most aus.tvers can do.
>
> baaa baaaaa.
Care to explain?
> >[2] I think we can all agree it's bloody annoying to have someone do
> > that, and not at all as clever as you think it is.
>
> For the people, by the people.
Care to explain?
Alex
> <kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>>It's called basic netiquette. It's also been discussed in this newsgroup,
>>and probably any other media-related newsgroup you've ever read. There's no
>>way you're not aware of the issue of spoiler space (let alone putting it in
>>the subject!), so either fess up as doing it on purpose to piss people off,
>>or admit that you did something stupid and let these threads end. Either
>>way, by continuing in this manner, you're just digging yourself a deeper
>>hole!
> I dont consider i did either of what you suggested.
> i did something people didnt like.
> Big difference.
Matthew, this isn't a playground and you're not five years old. Either you're
aware of basic netiquette or you aren't. _Either_ way there's no argument
you can advance which doesn't portray you as either a troll or an ignoramus.
As I said in an earlier post - it's your choice. I'd just shut up, if I were
you.
zaphy
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:58:01 +1030, Lofts <lo...@dingoblue.net.au>
>wrote:
>
>>Don't you think a spoiler warning would have been nice for the people
>>that watch H&A Matthew?
>
>Tell that to the tv week, tv soap, newspapers, tv stations..etc etc.
It's tempting to abuse the lot of 'em. I'm still pissed off about the
media blabbing that Shane was gonna die.
--
zaphy..
Alex
>>
>>Um, what has a charter got to do with it? Spoiler space is one of the
>>basic courtesies in any newsgroup. Maybe you'll be wanting to take a
>>break from posting for a while until you learn a bit more about using
>>Usenet responsibly...
> LOL
> you are funny :-)
Actually, I was serious. However, if you wish to continue flaunting your
ignorance, immaturity and, often, just plain stupidity in front of a
world-wide audience, be my guest. I just hope for your sake that you're
not posting under your real name - if you ever want to be taken seriously
in the future you don't want any of these posts coming back to haunt
you...
Fish!
matthew...@dingoblue.net.au says...
> >that watch H&A Matthew?
>
>
>
*SO WHY THE FUCK DID YOU POST IT YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT*
--
"Choose Again" - Aenea 'The Rise of Endymion'
Feelin' GOOG!
Fish!
matthew...@dingoblue.net.au says...
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:03:55 +1100, Spooky Guy Next Door
> <mgall...@cyberfuddle.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >As slimy things with legs walked upon the slimy sea, Matthew
> >(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> >
> >> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:37:12 GMT, meerka...@hotmail.com (The
> >> Meerkat) wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:08:33 -0800, Matthew
> >> ><matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> scattered the following pearls of
> >> >wisdom before the assembled droogs:
> >> >
> >> >>This week Fisher will find out about a disease that will kill him on
> >> >>home and away.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Geez, just being on Home and Away should do the job, no need for a
> >> >disease.
> >>
> >> Well, if i had the choice of having a guaranteed high rating
> >> Australian television show earning $3200 a week or sitting at home
> >> watching American soaps and collecting $400 a fortnight on the dole..
> >> i know which choice i would make.
> >
> >What a pity you don't have a choice, dole boy...
>
> What possibly could lead you to believe that?
>
your inability to demonstrate that you have any grasp on, ethics, humor,
pc's, the internet, netiquette etc.
But hey you got what you wanted, you knew exactly what your post would
do, never deny you're a troll you fucking sad sad loser.
Chris Mayer
>
> Im a troll for reporting what happens on an Australian tv programme??
>
> Sorry, i thought this was a group about aussie tv and for discussing
> home and away < alt.tv.home-and-away >
>
This thread, and that post proves once an for all the troll you are, and a
pathetic one at that.
Chris Mayer
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:47:45 +1100, "Chris Mayer"
> <chris...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
Chris Mayer
Chris Mayer
>
> What possibly could lead you to believe that?
Actually you are right, that was a stupid thing to say, the chance of you
being able to fill in the 'dole book' is so slim you wouldn't have a chance
of getting the dole.
Chris Mayer
"Chris Mayer" <chris...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9tjqvn$36bg3$1...@ID-100598.news.dfncis.de...
> This thread, and that post proves once an for all the troll you are, and a
> pathetic one at that.
Apologies for the multiple posts, OE went nuts on me, and now wont let me
cancel.
Chris Mayer
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:04:01 +1100, Spooky Guy Next Door
> <mgall...@cyberfuddle.com> wrote:
>
> >You were deliberately posting a spoiler. Worse, you posted it for a
> >soapie (y'know, the crappy shows that people only watch for the
> >*surprises* you've just robbed them of).
>
> preview an episode for next weeks whatever?
>
> >
>
>
> My academic records would argue that point, but believe what you must.
That comment alone proves you to be an idiot.
Looks there is some inescapable logic for even your twisted insane head. One
of these two possibilities, has to be the right one, there is no way out.
1: You have been around this newsgroup long enough to KNOW people don't like
spoilers posted in subjects and/or without appropriate spoiler warnings.
Hence by posting what you did you were trolling to create the furore that it
eventually did.
2: After being around this newsgroup as long as you have, you still have no
ideas about netiquette in general, and the netiquette specifically relating
to this group. This would make you an ignoramus of the highest order.
As I have been saying for a long time, you are either and ignoramus or a
troll. You pick which one.
ann bishop
> My typing can be shit because i may have just had a long day.
> My typing maybe bad because i have a kid screaming his head off a
> metre or two away from me.
Perhaps as your his father you should consider picking him up and
comforting him.
annieb
ann bishop
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:15:05 -0800, Matthew
> <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
>
> >It was on tv, in two magazines, one newspaper.
>
> So? There's no need to repeat their wrong-doing here.
You know he lives to annoy. ;)
RMG
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:18 +1100, anni...@optusnet.com.au (ann
> bishop) wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:15:05 -0800, Matthew
> >> <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
> >>
> >> >It was on tv, in two magazines, one newspaper.
> >>
> >> So? There's no need to repeat their wrong-doing here.
> >
> >You know he lives to annoy. ;)
>
>
> Should i put on a white wooly coat, drop to all fours and go baaaaa
> baaaaa?
Only if you want the kiwis to love you
Max Power
Dean Hollister wrote:
>
> Matthew <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> writes:
>
> >Im a troll for reporting what happens on an Australian tv programme??
>
> You're an idiot for not including spoiler space. As idiotic as the Survivor
> troll.
>
> ***Think*** before you type. Got it?
Your starting to forget, your talking to Goodyear. He can't possibly
do _two_ things at the same time, or even in a simple order like that!
--
Mike Brown
"So mono equals one, and rail means rail."
Max Power
Matthew wrote:
> >
> >What a lame troll. Not one spelling mistake or Goodyear-ism to be
> >seen.
>
> Oh get over it.
> I was reporting about an upcoming episode of a television show on
> Australian television.
Spoiling isn't reporting, Goodyear.
Chris Mayer
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:07:29 +1100, Max Power
> <mail=/\\/\\ikeB...@ihug.com.au/\\/\\=liam> wrote:
>
> >
> >Matthew wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> >What a lame troll. Not one spelling mistake or Goodyear-ism to be
> >> >seen.
> >>
> >> Oh get over it.
> >> I was reporting about an upcoming episode of a television show on
> >> Australian television.
> >
> >Spoiling isn't reporting, Goodyear.
>
>
> That's so old now.
Not as old as your moronic antics.
Michael Fleming
scribed into the Great Tome of Farnarkling:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:08:33 -0800, Matthew
> <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
>
>>This week Fisher will find out about a disease that will kill him on
>>home and away.
>>
>
> You're a fuckin arsehole Matthew. My wife and I DO watch home and away
> and as pathetic and repetitive as the story lines may be, we actually
> enjoy watching. With busy lifestyles it's one of the few TV show we
> get time to watch and don't need inconsiderate pricks like you posting
> spoilers without any warning etc. especially in the header!!!
>
> I know you're raving on about TV guides and magazines, but I
> specifically avoid reading them to avoid situations like this.
>
> Have a brain and a heart and think before you type in future, please.
>
> Bitterly disappointed
Hate to say it but you're talking to a very. very thick brick wall.
Matthew knows exactly what he is doing (despite his childish and boring
repeated remonstrations to the contrary) and really couldn't give a
rat's arse what others think, because in Matthew's Usenet (tm) only
Matthew really exists or matters, we're just here to make up the
numbers. If you gave this devolved whatchamacallit a blank cheque and
set him loose in a clue store he'd still exit the checkout empty handed
- and would probably do so deliberately just to piss people off (a
favourite pastime of usenetters without worthwhile lives).
Given that he can't keep a consistent email address (I've endeavoured to
killfile it many times and it morphs over and over) and time zone (a 20
second operation even in an "arcane" setup like mine) I'm
astonished he can operate a computer at all, let alone post to usenet.
If someone would just go an put an axe through his PC (preferably
multiple times with a large pick-axe) aus.tv and the world would be a
much happier place.
(Or as an alternative put him on an ISP run exclusively by BOFHs -
"your posts not propagating Matthew? <clickety-click> Must be the
upstream feeds" <clickety-click>")
Michael (who in 6 years of usenet has yet to see such a deliberately
"seemingly clueless/naive" yet vindictive troll like this uberluser)
--
Michael Fleming <mflemin...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au>
"I see stupid people. They're everywhere. They walk around like everyone
else. They don't even know they're dumb."
Michael Fleming
into the Great Tome of Farnarkling:
>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:29:36 +1100, "Katharine S"
>> <kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>
>>>It's called basic netiquette. It's also been discussed in this
>>>newsgroup, and probably any other media-related newsgroup you've ever
>>>read. There's no way you're not aware of the issue of spoiler space
>>>(let alone putting it in the subject!), so either fess up as doing it
>>>on purpose to piss people off, or admit that you did something stupid
>>>and let these threads end. Either way, by continuing in this manner,
>>>you're just digging yourself a deeper hole!
>
>> I dont consider i did either of what you suggested. i did something
>> people didnt like. Big difference.
<sigh>
> Matthew, this isn't a playground and you're not five years old.
You never know, he just might be...
> Either you're aware of basic netiquette or you aren't.
I think that answers itself...
> _Either_ way there's no argument you can advance which doesn't portray
> you as either a troll or an ignoramus.
He should know this already...
> As I said in an earlier post - it's your choice. I'd just shut up, if
> I were you.
He won't - just put up some bullshit "Why? I did nothing wrong" defence
to up his Weekly Stats...
> Alex.
Michael.
Katharine S
> >It's called basic netiquette. It's also been discussed in this newsgroup,
> >and probably any other media-related newsgroup you've ever read. There's
no
> >way you're not aware of the issue of spoiler space (let alone putting it
in
> >the subject!), so either fess up as doing it on purpose to piss people
off,
> >or admit that you did something stupid and let these threads end. Either
> >way, by continuing in this manner, you're just digging yourself a deeper
> >hole!
>
> i did something people didnt like.
> Big difference.
No difference.
> Ok, im evil..i will admit i am a bad bad man if it will make things
> easier for you :-)
I never suggested that you were evil or a 'bad bad man', so why would that
make it easier for me?
>
> Next time i find out something that everone who reeds tv week already
> knows i will put in a spoiler space.
> Satisfied?
And how many people here actually read TV Week? Whether or not something's
already been in some media is irrelevent to the issue of spoiler space.
Katharine S
"Dean Hollister" <de...@blackhole.mushka.cx> wrote in message
news:3bfcf1e6$1...@news.wa.apana.org.au...
> "Katharine S" <kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> writes:
>
> >> Not everyone *reads* those publications.
>
> >Agreed. This was the first I'd heard of it.
>
> Ditto.
>
> >> The TV stations would not release
> >> a major spoiler like that, they'd only hint at something.
>
> >Not necessarily true.
>
> They wouldn't. For reasons of the backlash it would cause.
You'd think so, but I've seen info printed that spoils the storyline a
number of times. Plus, I used to work for the company that does most of the
TV guides in Australian papers, and the info that the TV stations sent us
often gave away fairly vital stuff!
Chris Mayer
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:19:55 +1100, "Chris Mayer"
> <chris...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> God, there are better ways to upset me than using my surname.
> >> That's so old now.
> >
> >Not as old as your moronic antics.
> >
>
Ahhh, so you are actually admitting your antics are moronic? That's a
change from your usual tack of "I didn't do it".
Waits for response of how Matthew didn't actually just say that....
Chris Mayer
"Michael Fleming" <bitb...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au> wrote in
message news:9tkc61$ht4$2...@defender.fugu.2y.net...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:27:35 +0800 Todd <todd...@iprimus.com.au>
> scribed into the Great Tome of Farnarkling:
> Michael (who in 6 years of usenet has yet to see such a deliberately
> "seemingly clueless/naive" yet vindictive troll like this uberluser)
Yep I have to agree, I am getting close to clocking up 10 years of usenet
usage, and I have never seen anyone come close.
Fish!
says...
> Matthew <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> writes:
>
> >Should i put on a white wooly coat, drop to all fours and go baaaaa
> >baaaaa?
>
>
I imagine that once, during the conception, would have been enough.
--
Annette Fraser
>On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:24:38 +1100, "Katharine S"
><kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>
>>And how many people here actually read TV Week?
>
>
I don't
Annette
--
High Priestess of The Big Penguin
The Merchandise Queen
PokeyBun - Gotta mug 'em all
Chris Mayer
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:24:38 +1100, "Katharine S"
> <kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> >And how many people here actually read TV Week?
>
Well, I don't so there goes that theory.
Chris Mayer
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:57:50 +1100, "Chris Mayer"
> <chris...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Ahhh, so you are actually admitting your antics are moronic? That's a
> >change from your usual tack of "I didn't do it".
>
> thay way?
> Thanks
No that is your twisted interpretation, but at least you are admitting you
do moronic things, that is a start.
Matthew
<chris...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>No that is your twisted interpretation, but at least you are admitting you
>do moronic things, that is a start
Yes, only to those who have done them to me in the past.
I dont hassle anyone who hasnt given me shit before.
Ive actually appologised to two people..and those 2 people are 2 that
have never given me shit.
Maybe you can learn something from that Chris.
matthew
Katharine S
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:24:38 +1100, "Katharine S"
> <kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> >And how many people here actually read TV Week?
>
What, you've spoken to everyone on this newsgroup and asked them this? I
certainly don't.
> Whether or not something's
> >already been in some media is irrelevent to the issue of spoiler space.
>
>
> ok
> im sorry
That's more like it :)
Chris Mayer
You have a real problem with cause and effect don't you?
If I know one thing Matthew, it is that I have nothing to learn from you.
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:27:13 +1000 (EST),
> bitb...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au (Michael Fleming) wrote:
>
> >(Or as an alternative put him on an ISP run exclusively by BOFHs -
> >"your posts not propagating Matthew? <clickety-click> Must be the
> >upstream feeds" <clickety-click>")
>
> Gotta love how people like you just pop out of nowhere.
>
> I bet you havent killfiled the people who constantly abuse?
> Nah, your just a loser who drops fromnowhere int he hope of a pat on
> the back for joining the party.
You *do* constantly abuse, Matthew.
You constantly abuse the conventions of this group...
--
The ideas expressed in the above post are my own, with the possible
exception of the one involving a scarecrow and a stick of butter.
blog - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/infinitebabble/
cyberfuddle - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/
learn HTML - http://smiley.vh.mewl.net/markhtml/
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:18 +1100, anni...@optusnet.com.au (ann
> bishop) wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:15:05 -0800, Matthew
> >> <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
> >>
> >> >It was on tv, in two magazines, one newspaper.
> >>
> >> So? There's no need to repeat their wrong-doing here.
> >
> >You know he lives to annoy. ;)
>
> What would you know?
>
> Should i put on a white wooly coat, drop to all fours and go baaaaa
> baaaaa?
No, that would be annoying. We're trying to get you to *stop* annoying
us.
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:24:38 +1100, "Katharine S"
> <kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> >And how many people here actually read TV Week?
>
> Everyone
No, not everyone.
I don't know of a single aus.tv user who does[0].
> Whether or not something's
> >already been in some media is irrelevent to the issue of spoiler space.
>
> ok
> im sorry
Are you?
[0] For all I know, you don't even read it - you may have just seen it on
the cover.
Brett O'Callaghan
>"Matthew" <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
>> This week SPOILER REMOVED
>> cya flat head!
>Explain your way out of this one, fuckwit troll?
Oh, matthew has progressed to the next level of fnucked-up loser
trolliness then? How sad. Of course, I've had him kill-filed for
weeks now, I suggest everyone else try it if they can.
Byeeeee.
--
http://www.geocities.com/brettocallaghan
Home of QDNStats V2 - Newsgroup Stats for Agent
Hayles
**Hayles**
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>>
>>What a lame troll. Not one spelling mistake or Goodyear-ism to be
>>seen.
>
>Oh get over it.
>I was reporting about an upcoming episode of a television show on
>Australian television.
Oh shit was that really you?
I saw it came from optusnet and thought it was one of your numerous
admirers.
In that case - put some fucking spoiler space in for those that don't
want to know about an upcoming episode - especially when you post to a
group like alt.tv.home-and-away which surely has participants who are
further behind in the schedule that aussie viewers.
--
Trev.
The difference between a bad Hollywood movie and a bad foreign movie is that
in the Hollywood one, the explosions at least keep you awake - Gregg Araki
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>Well, if i had the choice of having a guaranteed high rating
>Australian television show earning $3200 a week or sitting at home
>watching American soaps and collecting $400 a fortnight on the dole..
>i know which choice i would make.
Dignity is more important than money Goodyear.
Chris Mayer
"Trevor Gensch" <tre...@consultant.com> wrote in message
news:j7nqvtsfero7kom0r...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:49:06 -0800, the following from Matthew
> <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
> and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>
>
> >Well, if i had the choice of having a guaranteed high rating
> >Australian television show earning $3200 a week or sitting at home
> >watching American soaps and collecting $400 a fortnight on the dole..
> >i know which choice i would make.
>
> Dignity is more important than money Goodyear.
You may have to give him a link to an online dictionary for that dignity
word.
Matthew
wrote:
>Nothing like a good cat fight eh? :}
>
>**Hayles**
>
and these asstralians know how to do it..not :-)
Matthew
Sarch
bitb...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au (Michael Fleming) wrote:
[snip]
I do wonder why many people in here over several threads, those who are
crying foul about deliberate spoilers, are requoting Goodyear's original
thread without indicating that their reply contains the spoilers. You'd
think they would given that the subject had been modified to hide the
spoiler. It's an interesting level of irony. Not that I'm trying to
de-emphasise Goodyear's level of stupidity, of course.
Sarch
--
Spamblock in action: Remove NOTREAL from email address to reply via email.
"Look, if that's where those poor children are, of course I'll go
to Somalia." - Amanda Keller, "The Hub"
Micmar
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:31:24 +1000 (EST),
> bitb...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au (Michael Fleming) wrote:
>
> >
> >> As I said in an earlier post - it's your choice. I'd just shut up, if
> >> I were you.
> >
> >He won't - just put up some bullshit "Why? I did nothing wrong" defence
> >to up his Weekly Stats...
>
> Ive not been on top of the stats for over 6 months.
>
> Matthew
Even more insentive to get back there....
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:50:05 +1100, Spooky Guy Next Door
> <mgall...@cyberfuddle.com> wrote:
>
> >As slimy things with legs walked upon the slimy sea, Matthew
> >(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> >
> >> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:27:13 +1000 (EST),
> >> bitb...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au (Michael Fleming) wrote:
> >>
> >> >(Or as an alternative put him on an ISP run exclusively by BOFHs -
> >> >"your posts not propagating Matthew? <clickety-click> Must be the
> >> >upstream feeds" <clickety-click>")
> >>
> >> Gotta love how people like you just pop out of nowhere.
> >>
> >> I bet you havent killfiled the people who constantly abuse?
> >> Nah, your just a loser who drops fromnowhere int he hope of a pat on
> >> the back for joining the party.
> >
> >You *do* constantly abuse, Matthew.
> >
> >You constantly abuse the conventions of this group...
>
> Rubbish.
You don't evade (accidentally or otherwise) killfiles? You don't use the
wrong timezone?
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:51:08 +1100, Spooky Guy Next Door
> <mgall...@cyberfuddle.com> wrote:
>
> >As slimy things with legs walked upon the slimy sea, Matthew
> >(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> >
> >> Should i put on a white wooly coat, drop to all fours and go baaaaa
> >> baaaaa?
> >
> >No, that would be annoying. We're trying to get you to *stop* annoying
> >us.
>
> I really think you should spak for yourself and stop trying to be a
> hero.
I hope for your sake you don't consider that an intelligent come-back.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>>
>>You absolute twat.
>
>
>It is in the friggin tv book!
Is that an excuse to spoil it?
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>I really think you should spak for yourself and stop trying to be a
>hero.
He speaks for a *lot* of us Goodyear.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>I would have said sorry to you had you not been equally as stupid and
>changed the topic to what you did.
How is removing the spoiler equally as stupid?
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>>He won't - just put up some bullshit "Why? I did nothing wrong" defence
>>to up his Weekly Stats...
>
>Bullshit.
>Ive not been on top of the stats for over 6 months.
Well, that's one blessed relief then.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>I dont consider i did either of what you suggested.
>i did something people didnt like.
You posted something with the common courtesy of spoiler space. Be a
man and admit that at least.
>Next time i find out something that everone who reeds tv week already
>knows i will put in a spoiler space.
>Satisfied?
That is what you said last time you didn't include spoiler space. Did
you a hard format of your brain and lost that nugget of information?
Decent, normal people post spoiler space if there is any chance that a
devotee of the show might glimpse something that will ruin his/her
enjoyment of an upcoming episode of their favourite program.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:24:38 +1100, "Katharine S"
><kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>
>>And how many people here actually read TV Week?
>
>Everyone
Sure Goodyear.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:51:47 GMT, Alex <al...@leng.zip.com.au> wrote:
>
>>
>>Um, what has a charter got to do with it? Spoiler space is one of the
>>basic courtesies in any newsgroup. Maybe you'll be wanting to take a
>>break from posting for a while until you learn a bit more about using
>>Usenet responsibly...
>
>LOL
>you are funny :-)
>
If you consider observing basic guidelines of common decency funny
then there is no hope for you at all Goodyear, and you are truly the
troll that aus.tv has know you have been since you arrived here.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>I treat people how they treat me.
Ah, that explains why you come across as a moron.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:27:13 +1000 (EST),
>bitb...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au (Michael Fleming) wrote:
>
>>(Or as an alternative put him on an ISP run exclusively by BOFHs -
>>"your posts not propagating Matthew? <clickety-click> Must be the
>>upstream feeds" <clickety-click>")
>
>Gotta love how people like you just pop out of nowhere.
>
>I bet you havent killfiled the people who constantly abuse?
>Nah, your just a loser who drops fromnowhere int he hope of a pat on
>the back for joining the party.
It should say something that a supposed lurker (which Michael isn't
BTW) 'drops fromnowhere' comes to the conclusion he did.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>>
>>You *do* constantly abuse, Matthew.
>>
>>You constantly abuse the conventions of this group...
>
>Rubbish.
Then you believe that lack of spoiler space is not against the
conventions and spirit of this group?
David Buttery
> Oh great. I haven't watched it in weeks, and was looking forward to
> seeing it next week, and now I find THAT out.
Think you've got problems? Here in the UK we don't see it till next
*year*! Please folks, remember that a.tv.h-a-a is *not* just read by
Aussies - either keep Aussie-specific stuff on aus.tv only or stick a
spoiler warning in. Cheers.
--
Sceptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which
deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense -- Carl Sagan
The GPL Scrapyard returns (slowly): http://www.hillclimbfan.f2s.com
Lofts
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:58:01 +1030, Lofts <lo...@dingoblue.net.au>
>wrote:
>
>>Don't you think a spoiler warning would have been nice for the people
>>that watch H&A Matthew?
>
>Tell that to the tv week, tv soap, newspapers, tv stations..etc etc.
>
>Matthew
Well can you please not do it again.. its not very nice to spoil tv
shows for people... :(
Lofts
>wrote:
>
>>
>>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:08:33 -0800, the following from Matthew
>>><matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
>>>and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>>>
>>>>home and away.
>>>>
>>>>cya flat head!
>>>
>>>What a lame troll. Not one spelling mistake or Goodyear-ism to be
>>>seen.
>>
>
>This post is about Home and Away.
>
>Matthew
Was :P
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>>Dignity is more important than money Goodyear.
>
>
>The only thing more important than Money is family.
You live one truly fucked up life Goodyear.
Trevor Gensch
<matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> gushed forth from their keyboard
and spilled out into aus.tv the following:
>Ok
>Sounds fair.
Listen this time. You said all this last time you popped a major
spoiler.
And you still haven't learnt.
Smiler
discussing current topics going on in a show that is from Australia, as I
have said before you don't see people requesting that a spoiler be posted
for say a US show that we are behind in, you should come to this newsgroup
being aware that you might find out stuff you don't want to know, and yes I
know people from the UK think that they are keeping the show on the air and
yes I know this newsgroup was started by someone in the UK but I still
refuse to post spoiler warnings about current issues as seen here in AUS,
not that it matters as I am a lurker anyway (most of the time).
Hey Matthew keep up the spoilers, although I don't always believe you
anymore not after the whole Ailsa thing.... not to worry. ;o)
> Aussies - either keep Aussie-specific stuff on aus.tv only or stick a
> spoiler warning in. Cheers.
>
> --
> Sceptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which
> deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense -- Carl Sagan
>
> The GPL Scrapyard returns (slowly): http://www.hillclimbfan.f2s.com
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
Check out our new Unlimited Server. No Download or Time Limits!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! ==-----
Sarch
bitb...@michaelfleming.webcentral.com.au (Michael Fleming) wrote:
>Given that he can't keep a consistent email address (I've endeavoured to
>killfile it many times and it morphs over and over) and time zone (a 20
>second operation even in an "arcane" setup like mine) I'm
>astonished he can operate a computer at all, let alone post to usenet.
Of course, most of us know that he's deliberately being a right dickhead,
plain and simple. For example, I find it extremely difficult to believe that
someone such as Goodyear, who has the ability to hunt down and apply
software cracks, who can set his usenet program to use the "X-No-Archive:
Yes" header, and format his hard drive and reinstall Windows, can't for the
life of himself work out how to double click on his taskbar to bring up the
time/date dialog.
V01TeK
> Oh get over it.
> I was reporting about an upcoming episode of a television show on
> Australian television.
You weren't reporting, you were spoiling. Now I don't give a flying fuck
about this show, but I'd expect the same courtesy for the shows I watch. Is
it only a matter of time before you spoil them too?
Chris
V01TeK
>
> This post is about Home and Away.
>
It stopped being about Home and Away when you started acting like a troll
and spoiled ... which was right at the beginning.
Chris
Sara-Marie
he he
"Matthew" <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
news:n26tvt00lr60ftcng...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:18 +1100, anni...@optusnet.com.au (ann
> bishop) wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:15:05 -0800, Matthew
> >> <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> regurgitated:
> >>
> >> >It was on tv, in two magazines, one newspaper.
> >>
> >> So? There's no need to repeat their wrong-doing here.
> >
> >You know he lives to annoy. ;)
>
> What would you know?
>
> Should i put on a white wooly coat, drop to all fours and go baaaaa
> baaaaa?
>
>
> Matthew
V01TeK
> It seems you do.
> If you hadnt of been a cunt about it, i would have just said sorry and
> moved on.
"hadn't of been?" Those three words don't make sense used together like
that. You're not even literate.
Chris
(oh, and you're a troll. and you smell)
V01TeK
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:24:38 +1100, "Katharine S"
> <kath...@nospamoptushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> >And how many people here actually read TV Week?
>
> Everyone
I don't. And I'd like to think that most people here are of enough
intelligence to avoid such tabloid trash.
In any event, you're wrong.
Chris
V01TeK
>
>
> The only thing more important than Money is family.
>
No Christian would believe this.
Chris
V01TeK
Isn't prevention better than cure?
Chris
Andrew Bayley
"Matthew" <matthew...@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in
message news:qbtrvtsh537k10qic...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:58:01 +1030, Lofts
<lo...@dingoblue.net.au>
> wrote:
>
> >Don't you think a spoiler warning would have been nice
for the people
> >that watch H&A Matthew?
>
> Tell that to the tv week, tv soap, newspapers, tv
stations..etc etc.
Which TV Week did you see it in? No mention of it in this
weeks.
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:57:22 +1000, Trevor Gensch
> <tre...@consultant.com> wrote:
>
> >>>Dignity is more important than money Goodyear.
> >>
> >>
> >>The only thing more important than Money is family.
> >
> >You live one truly fucked up life Goodyear.
>
> You know nothing about my life.
He knows you consider money (absurdly capitalised as "Money") to be more
important than all but family.
--
The ideas expressed in the above post are my own, with the possible
exception of the one involving a scarecrow and a stick of butter.
blog - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/infinitebabble/
cyberfuddle - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/
learn HTML - http://smiley.vh.mewl.net/markhtml/
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> how about biased hypocrisy?
Non sequitor AND a strawman. WTG!
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:30:13 +1000, Trevor Gensch
> <tre...@consultant.com> wrote:
>
> >>>You *do* constantly abuse, Matthew.
> >>>
> >>>You constantly abuse the conventions of this group...
> >>
> >>Rubbish.
> >
> >Then you believe that lack of spoiler space is not against the
> >conventions and spirit of this group?
>
> I guess it might very well be.
> But i dont see you jumping up and down about the Survivor spoilers..oh
> that's right, it isnt me that's doing it.
No, it's a confirmed troll, and reacting to him/her would only cause the
survivor spoilers to continue.
That's why many of us didn't say a word about your blatant disregard for
acceptable behaviour until we discovered it wasn't someone impersonating
you making the OP.
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> Dont be a cunt to me and i'll not be one to you.
> Simple as that.
Ah, so it was *our* behaviour that caused you to post the spoiler?
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> If people act like a cunt to me, i will act like one back.
> If you had bothered to noitice, i have been nice to a few people who
> were not totally rude to me.
>
> What does that tell you?
It tells me you're a fucking liar.
Unless of course you posted the spoiler solely because we were "act[ing]
like cunts". Because, Matthew, me ol' China, I'd consider deliberately
posting spoilers *in the fucking subject header* to be "acting like a
cunt" (as you so colourfully phrase it).
> matty be some dole bludger loser because he fights back against those
> who hassle him first.
The dole bludger thing was a joke - indeed, you initially took it as
such.
V01TeK
> Simple as that.
>
> You want peace, fine.
This has nothing to do with the fact that your original post was a spoiler.
I wasn't a cunt to you in the reply that you subsequently responded to
above.
Chris
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> I had no problems for the first year i was here.
> then you set your little mate against and all hell broke loose.
WTF are you on about now?
You aren't going to start that "Trevor and that 16yo skewlcidd folowed me
hear" crap again are you?
Spooky Guy Next Door
(matthew...@dingoblue.net.au) posted the following...
> Ok, sorry Lofts.
> i wont spoil Home and Away anymore.
Please don't spoil *anything*.
V01TeK
> >
> >No Christian would believe this.
>
What, like money is second most important after family? I hardly think I
spouted the larger crap here.
> If you were a christian you would learn the art of forgiveness and
> forgive me for my sins like i forgive you and others for sinning
> against me.
But you keep repeating your actions.
> I dont hold grudges, but it seems you and one or two others do.
> get over it will you.
>
> Oh, and Catholics hold Family and God above all else.
and money too, apparently ... but that's long been a criticism of the
Catholic church. It's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle
than it is for a rich man to enter heaven.
Allegedly.
Chris
V01TeK
>
> But i dont see you jumping up and down about the Survivor spoilers..oh
> that's right, it isnt me that's doing it.
There's a big difference here. the people spoiling survivor aren't regulars
here, and are mostly anonymous trolls. It would be pointless to attack them.
However, hope springs eternal that one day you'll learn.
Chris