The incorrigible Joel Rosenberg

[Anthony Sabatini]

Since I seem to be missing quite a few posts due to problems on my ISP's
news server, I've started a new thread in response to the following
article.

Subject: "Anthony Sabatini" -- fool, doofus, or bozo?
From: jo...@winternet.com (Joel Rosenberg)
Date: 1997/01/15
Message-Id: <joelr.8...@winternet.com>
References: <5b4r43$4...@lex.zippo.com>
<01bbffe9$4bfcc460$4c7213cc@server> <5ba1n0$h...@access5.digex.net>
<01bc00aa$659ba230$547213cc@server> <joelr.376...@winternet.com>
<01bc01b0$1df15b80$597213cc@server>
Organization: StarNet Communications, Inc
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism

"Anthony Sabatini" <anth...@infobahnos.com> writes:

>>Joel Rosenberg <jo...@winternet.com> wrote in article
>><joelr.376...@winternet.com>...
>>> In article <01bc00aa$659ba230$547213cc@server> "Anthony Sabatini"
>><anth...@infobahnos.com> writes:
>>>
>>> >[snip]
>>>
>>> >> >I again challenge the Nizkorites to explain an easy method whereby
>>> >someone
>>> >> >browsing their archives can reconstruct a thread so that someone's
>>> >comments
>>> >> >have the benefit of their proper context with respect to previous
>>> >messages
>>> >> >and responses.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.dejanews.com
>>>
>>> >Let's try this again. Read the above quote. You will notice that I
asked
>>> >how someone can recreate a thread
>>>
>>> By pointing their browser elsewhere, at an appropriate place.

>>So what you're saying, in effect, is that you have this cool library
where
>>you can go and look anything up, but if you actually want to make sense
of
>>the books therein, you have to go elsewhere. Wow! Isn't that a great
>>'service'...

> No, that's not what I'm saying, "Anthony".

Go ahead an re-read the entire exchange. Think about it, then revise this
statement.

> 1. The difference between pointing one's web browser at a different
> site and having to get into a car and go elsewhere is nontrivial.

> 2. Your postings, alas, are quite revealing in and of themselves,
> without a complete archive. We've seen this act before, "Anthony."

Really, "Joel"? <g> Where? When? Please provide URLs.

> 3. All posts on alt.revisionism are archived in Nizkor.

Hmmmmm....*you* seem to be missing from Nizkor's 'people' database. Go
ahead, take a look:

http://ftp.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi?people/r

Why do you think that is? Care to hazard a guess, "Joel"?

>>> Gee, that was easy, wasn't it, "Anthony."

>Joel, your wit is truly singular.

>And your wit is half.

Half what? Please, "Joel", explain.

>>> >browsing *their*, i.e., Nizkor's,
>>> >archives.
>>>
>>> Ah. And if they can't do it via Nizkor's server, but instead must use
a
>>> faster, more powerful one, it disadvantages whom, in what way?

>>Lazy browsers such as yourself.

> I think you've been taking Matt Giwer lessons.

I'm sorry, "Joel", but I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Can you please explain?

>>> And for this, you want to put people in jail, eh, "Anthony"?

>>No,

> Then why did you admit that you did? Are you backing off of it, or do
> you think that your posting are no longer being archived?

No, "Joel", I am not "backing off" my statement. I am merely pointing out
that *you* gave reasons for my statement which weren't mine. Or did you
forget that already?

> Short form: precisely what kind of idiot are you?

Oh, I don't know, "Joel". Perhaps *you* could shed some light on the
matter.

>>but I'm starting to believe you certainly belong behind bars; those of
>>a mental institute.

> Because I don't fall for your rap, "Anthony"?

"Rap"? What "rap"? I'm not singing here, "Joel". Oh, I get it. You're
trying to say "repartee", aren't you? Well in *that* case...

No, "Joel", I don't think you belong in a mental institute because you
don't agree with my opinions. I think you belong there because of your
track record. Yes, "Joel", go ahead and make a trip to DejaNews and do a
search on yourself. Re-read some of your posts. After a while, even *you*
will start to understand. (PS. Let me know if you need help.)

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you...Joel Rosenberg! You gotta love this guy!

[.sig snipped]

----------------------------------------
As a well-known and proven liar, anything that Mark Van Alstine says must
be carefully examined for evidence of further mistruths. His virulent
spewing of stupidity, the act of a mindless or merely ignorant person, is
often laced with holier-than-thou statements and blatant 'my way or no way'
assertions. For further evidence of Mark's asinine behavior, please check
out DejaNews (http://www.dejanews.com) and/or AltaVista
(http://www.altavista.com).

Web site coming soon!

[Richard J. Green]

Anthony Sabatini <anth...@infobahnos.com> wrote:

>As a well-known and proven liar, anything that Mark Van Alstine says must
>be carefully examined for evidence of further mistruths. His virulent
>spewing of stupidity, the act of a mindless or merely ignorant person, is
>often laced with holier-than-thou statements and blatant 'my way or no way'
>assertions. For further evidence of Mark's asinine behavior, please check
>out DejaNews (http://www.dejanews.com) and/or AltaVista
>(http://www.altavista.com).

Mr. Sabatini,

Would you be so kind as to refer me to specific proof that Mr. Van
Alstine has lied. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Regards,

Rich Green

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard J. Green Dept. of Chemistry
r...@lyman.Stanford.EDU Stanford University
http://www-leland.Stanford.EDU/~redcloud Stanford, CA 94305-5080

[Reinhardt Heydrich]

Anthony Sabatini wrote:
>
> Richard J. Green <r...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU> wrote in article
> <5brj5g$n...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU>...

> > Anthony Sabatini <anth...@infobahnos.com> wrote:
> >
> > >As a well-known and proven liar, anything that Mark Van Alstine says
> must
> > >be carefully examined

Yes, yes Herr Van Alstine must be very carefully examined using tried
and true techniques. Herr Van Alstine will talk and he will confess all
of his lies! Bruno will methodically interrogate him. He will talk,
theya ll talk regardless of how defiant they think they are. We will
break his will and he will be a quivering mass of humanity yes?

for evidence of further mistruths. His virulent
> > >spewing

His screams for Bruno to stop will be the only thing this swine will
spew. We have our ways in Berlin.

of stupidity, the act of a mindless or merely ignorant person,
> is
> > >often laced with holier-than-thou statements and blatant 'my way or no
> way'
> > >assertions. For further evidence of Mark's asinine behavior, please
> check
> > >out DejaNews (http://www.dejanews.com) and/or AltaVista
> > >(http://www.altavista.com).

We already have many files on said criminal Van Alstine and he will
eventually have to answer the charges.

> >
> > Mr. Sabatini,
> >
> > Would you be so kind as to refer me to specific proof that Mr. Van
> > Alstine has lied. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Mr. Van Alstine is a saboteur of Nizkor and that is all we need to bring
hin in for an especially vigorous interrogation! He will not be so cocky
after Bruno works with him. Don't worry Bruno has never killed anyone
yet and he is a master at his craft. Bruno could rightfully be called a
master of pain for he knows how to work every nerve and fiber to achieve
the results desired with the very least amount of tissue damage. The man
is devoted to his work as a true artisan!

Reinhardt Heydrich
Security Service

>
> I've already posted it, and we even discussed the matter via private
> e-mail. You disagreed. Too bad for you.
>
> [.sig snipped]

[Anthony Sabatini]

Richard J. Green <r...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU> wrote in article
<5brj5g$n...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU>...
> Anthony Sabatini <anth...@infobahnos.com> wrote:
>
> >As a well-known and proven liar, anything that Mark Van Alstine says
must

> >be carefully examined for evidence of further mistruths. His virulent
> >spewing of stupidity, the act of a mindless or merely ignorant person,

is
> >often laced with holier-than-thou statements and blatant 'my way or no
way'
> >assertions. For further evidence of Mark's asinine behavior, please
check
> >out DejaNews (http://www.dejanews.com) and/or AltaVista
> >(http://www.altavista.com).
>

> Mr. Sabatini,
>
> Would you be so kind as to refer me to specific proof that Mr. Van
> Alstine has lied. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

I've already posted it, and we even discussed the matter via private

[Richard J. Green]

"Doc" Tavish,

Are you threatening Mr. Van Alstine with bodily harm here? It doesn't
seem very wise to do that in such an obviously traceable manner unless
your goal is to get 3 square meals a day.

Best Regards,

Rich Green

In article <32E593...@heil.net>, Reinhardt Heydrich <si...@heil.net> wrote:

>Anthony Sabatini wrote:
>>
>> Richard J. Green <r...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU> wrote in article
>> <5brj5g$n...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU>...
>> > Anthony Sabatini <anth...@infobahnos.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >As a well-known and proven liar, anything that Mark Van Alstine says
>> must
>> > >be carefully examined
>

>Yes, yes Herr Van Alstine must be very carefully examined using tried
>and true techniques. Herr Van Alstine will talk and he will confess all
>of his lies! Bruno will methodically interrogate him. He will talk,
>theya ll talk regardless of how defiant they think they are. We will
>break his will and he will be a quivering mass of humanity yes?
>

>for evidence of further mistruths. His virulent
>> > >spewing
>

>His screams for Bruno to stop will be the only thing this swine will
>spew. We have our ways in Berlin.
>

>of stupidity, the act of a mindless or merely ignorant person,
>> is
>> > >often laced with holier-than-thou statements and blatant 'my way or no
>> way'
>> > >assertions. For further evidence of Mark's asinine behavior, please
>> check
>> > >out DejaNews (http://www.dejanews.com) and/or AltaVista
>> > >(http://www.altavista.com).
>

>We already have many files on said criminal Van Alstine and he will
>eventually have to answer the charges.
>
>> >

>> > Mr. Sabatini,
>> >
>> > Would you be so kind as to refer me to specific proof that Mr. Van
>> > Alstine has lied. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
>

>Mr. Van Alstine is a saboteur of Nizkor and that is all we need to bring
>hin in for an especially vigorous interrogation! He will not be so cocky
>after Bruno works with him. Don't worry Bruno has never killed anyone
>yet and he is a master at his craft. Bruno could rightfully be called a
>master of pain for he knows how to work every nerve and fiber to achieve
>the results desired with the very least amount of tissue damage. The man
>is devoted to his work as a true artisan!
>
> Reinhardt Heydrich
> Security Service
>
>>

>> I've already posted it, and we even discussed the matter via private
>> e-mail. You disagreed. Too bad for you.
>>
>> [.sig snipped]

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard J. Green Dept. of Chemistry
r...@lyman.Stanford.EDU Stanford University
http://www-leland.Stanford.EDU/~redcloud Stanford, CA 94305-5080

"Mars ain't the knid of place to raise your kids;
in fact, it's cold as hell, and there's no one there
to raise them, if you did." -Elton John

[Richard J. Green]

In article <01bc07f7$5cab7bb0$1a7213cc@server>,
Anthony Sabatini <anth...@infobahnos.com> wrote:

>Richard J. Green <r...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU> wrote in article
><5brj5g$n...@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU>...
>> Anthony Sabatini <anth...@infobahnos.com> wrote:
>>
>> >As a well-known and proven liar, anything that Mark Van Alstine says
>must

>> >be carefully examined for evidence of further mistruths. His virulent
>> >spewing of stupidity, the act of a mindless or merely ignorant person,

>is
>> >often laced with holier-than-thou statements and blatant 'my way or no
>way'
>> >assertions. For further evidence of Mark's asinine behavior, please
>check
>> >out DejaNews (http://www.dejanews.com) and/or AltaVista
>> >(http://www.altavista.com).
>>

>> Mr. Sabatini,
>>
>> Would you be so kind as to refer me to specific proof that Mr. Van
>> Alstine has lied. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
>

>I've already posted it, and we even discussed the matter via private
>e-mail. You disagreed. Too bad for you.

Mr. Sabatini,

Thanks for your reply. I might suggest that you check the date on a
message before replying. I sent this message before you attempted and
failed to demonstrate your allegation that Mr. Van Alstine was a _proven
liar_. All of my my posts in that conversation were posted publically
to this newsgroup, so I would not characterize the conversation as being
via private e-mail.

Best Regards,

Rich Green