I wanted to be sure that, as part of the world's record on Taylor
"Netscum" Jimenez (notorious Usenet Hoodlum), that people
see his tendency to knowlingly, intentionally and maliciously make
things up (lie) in order to do illegal libel/slander/defamation.
Several of the posts I make part of the Usenet archive record
(below) do this.
Taylor and Burnore are linked
not only to lies and malicious defamation, but to forgery, spam,
stalking and harassment (as you can see right before your eyes
here in this newsgroup!!)
He is exactly like a retarded street bully, only on Usenet. He is
off-topic and malicious. He would be kicked off
Usenet by any responsible ISP, but he uses the services of the
most notorious abuse domain on Usenet -- databasix.com This
"domain" (which has only a dozen of so hoodlums who use it -- since
it runs on only one Linux box) is run by
the convicted child molester, Gary L. Burnore.
"news done right" -- the databasix moto LOL !!!!!!
From:
Just Taylor <tay...@wilhelp.com>
Newsgroups:
sci.psychology.psychotherapy, alt.usenet.kooks, 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Subject:
Re: You can always count on Brad having his Child Porn buddy Richard Bullis around.
Date:
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:15:40 -0800
Organization:
DataBasix - Clealy sir, have proved you factually wrong.
Lines:
286
Sender:
nu...@databasix.com
Message-ID:
<a49ga7$flp$2...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>
References:
<9e1689a127baf7a7...@remailer.privacy.at> <u6eivaj...@corp.supernews.com> <a49fs7$eeq$2...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>
<u6g32m9...@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
astroconsulting.databasix.com
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
X-Trace:
astroconsulting.databasix.com 1013466249 16057 (11 Feb 2002 22:24:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
ab...@databasix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date:
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:24:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader:
Forte Agent 1.9/32.560
X-No-Archive:
yes
Xref:
wnmasters2 sci.psychology.psychotherapy:117285 alt.usenet.kooks:514548 24hoursupport.helpdesk:584406
X-Received-Date:
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:19:39 GMT
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:24:19 -0600, "unknown, RtS, AKA Richard
Bullis, KotM, LMA, Admitted Child Pornography Collector & Distributer"
took a moment out of child pornography collecting to write:
>First of all, I ain't no frickin buddy of Brad's.
Sure you are not. That's why you two are always posting the same crap in
the same group.
>scroll for more.
>
>"Just Taylor" <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
>news:a49fs7$eeq$2...@astroconsulting.databasix.com...
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 22:43:16 -0600, "unknown, RtS, AKA Richard
>> Bullis, KotM, LMA, Admitted Child Pornography Collector & Distributer"
>> took a moment out of child pornography collecting to write:
>>
>> >"Brad Jesness" <nob...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote in message
>> >news:9e1689a127baf7a7...@remailer.privacy.at...
>>
>> >> The is an absolute correlation and a very high correlation between Taylor
>> >> and/or Gary (the perv) being mad (as shown by other of their activities) AND
>> >> the posting of forgeries.
>> >>
>> >> Taylor Jimenez of Newport Beach, CA and/or Gary Burnore (BOTH with reputations
>> >> of being connected to forgery) are almost undoubtedly the forgers.
>> >>
>> >> It is disgraceful that any psychologist would have anything to do with these
>> >> individuals who obviously stalk and harass and spam in newsgroups they never
>> >> participate in. They do hoodlum acts for kicks. And, are likely connected
>> >> to forgeries. Both are connect to the most disreputable vanity domain
>> >> on all of Usenet. Both are hated by everyone everywhere except psychologists --
>> >> and it is all because they have done the dirty work for some of the unethical
>> >> psychologists here for years (as Peter Hood admits) Shameful. Impossible
>> >> to see it otherwise. Psychologist have used others to harass for them and
>> >> now use them to stalk and harass for them.
>> >>
>> >
>> >And when Taylor was found reviving a non existant domain of mine,
>> >richbull.com, he sulked for weeks when he had to remove the link from his
>> >website.
>>
>> Why do you lie like Brad, Stoopid? It was you who sulked about losing your
>> website over displaying child porn.
>
>No lie here, ignorant scumbag.
Everything you say is a lie, Stoopid.
>You hacked the server and posted a page I created.
I hacked the child porn page you created? Now that is a new one.
>You cried like a baby without his pacifier.
You cried like the nakkked babies you exploit.
>webhost forced you to remove the link.
My webhost forced me to remove the link?
Why are you so stupid? Stoopid. Odd how they forced me to remove the link
yet allowed the RtS FAQ and CENKOC page. Odd indeed.
>then you politely put it back up.
I never took it down.
>have all the fun you want with the domain name. It's not mine now.
Why would I want that piece of shit?
>> >Of course, he naturally claimed I had lost the account for posting child
>> >pornography.
>>
>> The truth hurts.
>>
>> >What account was there to lose?
>>
>> http://www.richbull.com.
>
>In name only. I still owned the domain name for another year.
>I contacted the host myself and cancelled the contract.
>It was not nuked by anyone but myself.
Once again you admit you owned and controlled the domain. We are up to lie
number five with you now. 1st you don't own it, then you do. Will you ever
make up your mind on who owned it?
>
>
>>
>> >As a matter of fact, NSI, at the time, said I was still the owner of that
>> >domain name.
>>
>> Well, duh.
>
>Sore loser ain't ya?
Sore loser? What are you babbling about? You confirm what I have said all
along. That you owned richbull.com.
Why are you so stupid?
>> >Seeing as how the hosting company was not being paid for the use of their
>> >services, the sole page was deleted by the hosting company.
>>
>> So not only were you displaying child porn you were not paying your bills.
>> What a shocker.
>
>What bill was there to pay? I had no account with them.
But just a second ago you said you had an account with them for a full year?
Oooops. Another lie.
>Prove the image was that of a child.
Must have been one of those pictures of 10 year olds that were "probably"
20.
>Prove it was pornographic.
>You can do neither.
>Still got the images too don't you?
Why don't you just post them again. You know you have them.
>>
>> >Then, in other subtle attempts to harass me even more, he tries to have my
>> >account with my ISP, charter.com, tossed.
>>
>> You shouldn't have been sending e-mail bombs then, Stoopid.
>
>BWAHHHHHHHHHAHAHAAHA
>I only sent you maybe 10 e-mails at the most.
>You call that a bomb?
As usual you lie. But that is nothing unusual for you or Brad. You both
think the same way.
>You, however, harassed the hell out of people royally in an attempt to have
>my account terminated.
Nope. Just a phone call to a contact there who put your abuse to an end.
You got your account suspended for the second time. The third will be your
last.
>Failing that, you claimed my account was nuked anyway.
That week you were missing, begging to get your account back was just that.
>> >Failing that, he then blasted away at their supplier of IP's.
>> >Again, failing miserably.
>>
>> Failing? You had it suspended for a second time, Stoopid. You called and
>> ranted about it and they have you one last chance. That is why for the most
>> part you have been a quite little child porn dealer, trying not to garner
>> much attention. I suspect you are out of a job again or about to run from
>> the law in your trailer again so you probably don't care if you lose your
>> account this time....
>
>Totally frickin wrong.
>My charter.com account has been active since day one.
Except for the two weeks you lost it over harassing Marcus and the week you
lost it for sending e-mail bombs to me. Other than that yep.
>You still haven't figured out how come I post through supernews have you?
I know exactly why you do. Geez Stoopid, for someone who can't even get my
name right you are in no position to claim nobody around here has a clue.
>Furthermore, I am employed and have been with this trucking company for two
>years.
Sure, Stoopid. Your trailer is probably loaded and ready to roll like it
was when you fled Kentucky.
>> >However, when no-lart.com came on the scene, he was succesful at having that
>> >tossed twice.
>>
>> Three times. All within a couple of days. You posted lies, Stoopid.
>> Respectable ISP's don't like people like you.
>
>hostrocket is operated by a punk kid anyway.
>and it was over a period of a little over a week, not a couple of days.
Oh but Hostrocket was a great, bullit-proof host according to you. You went
on and on about how nothing was going to happen to your website right up
until you picked your gaping jaw off the floor when you realized you lost
yet another account.
>> Why did you take my current page down? That is a great page. I love how
>> you try to defend your sick obsession with child porn. Put it back up so
>> people here can see Brad Jesness's newest friend.
>
>Still there. Just like your internal pages were not available from the main
>entry page for a long long time.
And you continue to lie. You removed the link at no-lart.com. Where are
the updates for Kendrick and Marcus? You have none. You are still probably
trying to figure out how to do so.
>Been visiting Bubba in jail have you?
Why? Unlike you I don't collect and distribute child porn. Unlike you I
didn't pack up the old Dodge and flee to another state when things started
to get hot. Unlike your buddy Brad I don't hide outside of psychologists
home's or call them in the middle of the night.
>> Then again, maybe its time to bring out the old RtS FAQ.
>>
>> >Only because he harassed the hell out of the hosts.
>> >My current host doesn't give a shit so he loses.
>>
>> You current host doesn't know what you are. Put that page you took down,
>> Stoopid. Let SPP see the (f)lame page where you try to justify why you
>> should be left alone with your private fantasies over boy and girls under 12
>> years old.
>
>My current host, bravidio.com, doesn't give a shit about your personal
>opinions.
>Show proof that you have been harmed in some way and they might shut me
>down.
We both know why you removed the URL on the page you wrote. It was
pathetic. It was a page were you try to justify your child porn collecting.
You removed it after people in alt.law-enforcement saw it and got all over
your pedophile ass for even thinking they would accept your child porn
defense..
Real smart, Stoopid. Telling LEO's about your child porn.
>Then again, maybe not.
>Like you, I have the same rights to my opinions as you to yours.
My opinions are based on your words. Your opinions are based on your lies.
People can judge for themselves,
http://www.no-lart.com/taylor1.htm
Quote,
>In the meantime though, I was getting into the habit of downloading various
>images of naked children.
>Some I back posted to the groups just for kicks. None of which were, or are, kiddy porn.
>Some time ago I posted a nude image of a young girl into a "wolfpack" group.
>This group was highly active in depicting naturist style living resort style.
>I was merely asking about content. Not the source of the material. Was it acceptable as....?
>Hell no. Get that damn erotic crap out of here. That came from a kiddy porn mag. Get out and stay out.
>And then along comes "netscum" to add fuel to the fire.
Day after day you try to defend why you download child porn. You even admit
the pictures you posted to the Wolfpack come from a Asian child porn rag.
This is why nobody likes you Stoopid. You are a child pornographer. I
would have thought Brad Jesness wouldn't sink to your level but I guess I'm
wrong. What a perv he must be to want people like you around.
>> >What's a matter taylor honey? I find your new home and now you hide?
>>
>> Wow! Another similarity to Brad Jesness! Both you and Brad actively seek
>> the groups I post in. What's next, Stoopid? Are you going to cry stalker
>> like you best friend Brad?
>
>Actually, I dont' give a shit about Brad.
You keep saying that while you follow him around like he was a 10 year old
boy at the park.
>I only posted there a few times to sniff you out and it worked.
Sure you did. Funny how *YOU TWO* are always following me around. Your
obsession couldn't be any more obvious than Brad's. Hurry, cry harassment
now.
--
Taylor NetScum (RIP 10/16/97)
****************************************************
I AM SO SMART! I AM SO SMART!
s-m-r-t...I MEAN s-m-A-r-t! - Homer Simpson, 1994
****************************************************
Maintainer of the Richard Bullis FAQ - Updated 06/06/2001
http://www.lart.com/stupidrichard/rtsfaq.html
That's correct, this info. is on:
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor Taylor Netscum Just Taylor
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez Taylor Jimenez
databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix
databasix.com databasix.com databasix.com databasix.com databasix.com
databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix
databasix.com databasix.com databasix.com databasix.com databasix.com
databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix databasix