Jill Dando Murder Suspect
Sue_R
hear the police are questioning a man called Barry Bulsara, who is supposed
to be a Freddie Mercury fanatic, in connection with the murder of Jill
Dando.
A die-hard Queen fan; I popped along to Freddie Mercury's house in Earls
Court to lay some flowers when he died. I was looking at the other flowers
laying along the wall when this white, stretch limo cruised up the road and
stopped outside the house.
A man stepped out who looked rather like Freddie Mercury and a buzz went
round that it was his cousin. He produced a large, white floral tribute in
the shape of an arch, with a gold plaque on the bottom inscribed with a
message, and signed from "your cousin, Barry Bulsara" (Bulsara, being
Mercury's real surname). My sister, knowing I had some artwork of Freddie
on me ( I had it with me to show somebody I was meeting), went and asked him
to sign one of my pictures, which he did.
I watched him surrounded by all these people and it dawned on me that a real
relative would not arrive in such an ostentatious manner, lay a tribute
outside the walls, and sign autographs. He would have just gone inside the
house.
When I got home, I thought "What a pathetic tosser", and blotted out the
signature on the picture, which I later sold.
I dug out some of the photo's I took of the flowers, today, and as I looked
at the picture I took of that floral arch, I had a really weird feeling
inside.
--
Sue R
--
Sue R
RedEye
"Sue_R" <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote in message
news:8gm1vm$88v$1...@supernews.com...
Wow freeky Sue!!
RedEye
Manic
This *is* spooky.
While we're on the subject, I'd like to congratulate the police on taking
over a year to round up this 'well known local nutter' who lived just a few
blocks away.
Are they by any chance the same bright sparks who decided they would have a
'really good look' in the backyard where the Acourts used to live?
Manic
Alistair Mann
news:959353648.4650.0...@news.demon.co.uk...
I was just wondering whether the chap they rounded up was Stephen Lawrence!
--
Alistair Mann
visit the uk.local.london website at
http://www.london-online.org.uk
Sue_R
RedEye <killa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> Wow freeky Sue!!
Just think...some poor unsuspecting soul has Mr Bulsara's autograph hanging
on their wall. I was quite pissed off at the time because it was a
particularly nice picture he signed.
He was very quiet but clearly loving the attention. Must have cost a bit to
hire that limo too.
--
Sue R
Sue_R
Rogi <ro...@rogis.com> wrote in message
news:k17tiskofkkvrtfci...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 26 May 2000 15:33:09 +0100, "Sue_R"
> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
>
> >A cold chill ran down my spine this morning <snip>
>
> That really is spooky. <shiver>...
Rogi...can you email me please? I've lost your ICQ number
--
Sue R
baloo
Manic <manic@deprčssivé.co.uk> wrote in message
news:959353648.4650.0...@news.demon.co.uk...
> "Sue_R" <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote in message
> news:8gm1vm$88v$1...@supernews.com...
<snip>
>
> This *is* spooky.
>
> While we're on the subject, I'd like to congratulate the police on taking
> over a year to round up this 'well known local nutter' who lived just a
few
> blocks away.
>
Ever heard of a thing called *evidence* ?
The old bill are criticised when they arrest people without evidence, and
here you are criticising them when they wait till they get it !
Baloo
loob...@male.dotcom.fr
Rogi wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 May 2000 15:33:09 +0100, "Sue_R"
> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
>
> >A cold chill ran down my spine this morning <snip>
>
> That really is spooky. <shiver>...
> --
> Rogi.
Yeah me too! I was feeling all warm until a minute ago!
Cliff
change male to mail to reply
icq 53842499
________________________________________________________
Ours is an era massively engaged in repudiating
the collective impulse.
Richard Sennett
________________________________________________________
Sue_R
> On Fri, 26 May 2000 22:54:05 +0100, Keyser Soze
> <mrkeys...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> >And as yo uhave all missed so far, .<snip>
>
> *No* way this bloke is the perp, it`s just so comically convenient.
>
> He lives 1 km away, is a stalker, and knows how to modify weaponry? NO
> way.
>
> LOL! Do me a favour mate.
The bit I don't understand, is that as a Freddie Mercury nut, wouldn't it
make more sense for him to stalk somebody connected with him, rather than
Jill Dando. When I saw him, he didn't strike me as a raving loony, more an
attention seeking twazzock.
..and if you read anything different in the next few days, I never said it.
--
Sue R
Sue_R
<snip>
I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Why don't you think it might have
been him, though?
--
Sue R
Petronius
news:RBBX4.1083$DC2.1...@nnrp3.clara.net...>
> I'm waiting to see how this one plays out. Innocent until proven guilty
and
> all that.
>
I have heard they have asked for extra time to question him. I wonder if
these are questions on the line of "(...?)...if you plead guilty, you'll get
off lightly". If I suppose they have some sort of evidence, am I putting
too much faith in the police force?
--
PAB
http://www.buchwald.dircon.co.uk
Sue_R
> Info overkill :)
Well....I'd have been worth a small fortune now if I'd bothered to take his
picture that day...I didn't because I thought he was a bit of a plonker,
standing there with this big flowery arch and a limo big enough to hold a
party in. The Press are falling over themselves trying to get a photo of
him. Dagnabbit...
Mind you, Rogi, surely if someone's nutty enough to go round pretending to
be someone's relative, and turning up at their house in hired limo's,
signing autographs etc, they can't be all the ticket. really, can they? He
even took Live! TV in..a female journo got in the car with him and went
round the block in it intervewing him.
--
Sue R
John Dean
baloo <blak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8gmi9k$3s0$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
When you have evidence you go a step further & charge them. That's why
the Lawrence enquiry criticised the police for not arresting the Acourts
etc. as soon as there was reasonable suspicion based on witness reports
etc. i.e. within 24 hours. That would have enabled them to search the
homes & gardens for evidence which might still have been there at that
early stage (stained clothing, weapons etc.). If they had evidence
against friend Bulsara they would have charged him by now.. They're
hoping for a confession and / or forensics from his habitat. That's why
they originally had 36 hours only after which they had to apply for an
extension of custody (which they got) and they can now hold him for
another couple of days. And if they then release him (which is my bet)
the greed for favourable publicity will have ruined the guy's life. It
would have done no harm for the Police to keep quiet while they sussed
out if he really is a contender.
If you ever want to sue for wrongful arrest it won't be enough to show
that the Police had no evidence against you, you'll have to show absence
of reasonable grounds for suspicion
--
John Dean -- Oxford
I am anti-spammed -- defrag me to reply
john...@msn.com
Sue_R
> `bullet` - and then go shoot the nearest Celeb. Nah sounds well dodgy
> to me, and I don`t care how big the car was :)
It was bloody big....it had one of those boomerang things on the back and
thirty asylum seekers in the boot.
;)
--
Sue R
Sue_R
John Dean <john...@fragmsn.com> wrote in message
news:8gn4ec$lp$1...@supernews.com...
If they had evidence
> against friend Bulsara they would have charged him by now.. They're
> hoping for a confession and / or forensics from his habitat. That's why
> they originally had 36 hours only after which they had to apply for an
> extension of custody (which they got) and they can now hold him for
> another couple of days. And if they then release him (which is my bet)
> the greed for favourable publicity will have ruined the guy's life.
From what I can glean, the police were at his house six weeks ago taking
computer equipment away for examination. As far as publicity goes; the man
thrived on it. I've met him, and to see him standing outside Mercury's
house talking sorrowfully about his "cousin Freddie" while standing beside a
white stretch limo, was more than a tad ridiculous.
The only bit that bothers me is why he'd want (allegedly) to kill Jill
Dando..I can't see what the interest was....unless he was obsessed with her
too, but then if he was a nuisance to her, surely the police would have
known about him sooner..interesting..
--
Sue R
Sue_R
Hmmm...put it this way....wish I'd never opened my mouth about it on ULL
now..
--
Sue R
tiny
Worst thing is being up this late talking to me about it.
Sue_R
tiny <t_clip...@brain.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> Worst thing is being up this late talking to me about it.
Hehe...we must stop meeting like this...another coffee?
;)
--
Sue R
Sue_R
Sure thing....I just set light to my fringe....can you give me a minute
while I put my head out? <sizzle>
--
Sue R
Sue_R
> On Sat, 27 May 2000 04:00:35 +0100, "Sue_R"
> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
> >
> >Sure thing....I just set light to my fringe....can you give me a minute
> >while I put my head out? <sizzle>
>
You're all heart you are...my blummin' head was on fire...I can't get on
with these Zippo's..
One lump ot two?
;)
--
Sue R
tiny
> On Sat, 27 May 2000 03:49:27 +0100, "Sue_R"
> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
> >tiny <t_clip...@brain.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> Worst thing is being up this late talking to me about it.
> >
> >Hehe...we must stop meeting like this...another coffee?
> >;)
>
> Can I have one too?
Well, I just finished the pot and made fresh.
tiny
> > On Sat, 27 May 2000 04:00:35 +0100, "Sue_R"
> > <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
> > >Sure thing....I just set light to my fringe....can you give me a minute
> > >while I put my head out? <sizzle>
> >
> > No,No first the Coffee. :)
>
> You're all heart you are...my blummin' head was on fire...I can't get on
> with these Zippo's..
> One lump ot two?
> ;)
On your head? Can't you tell?
tiny
> On Sat, 27 May 2000 04:06:44 +0100, "Sue_R"
> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
> >Rogi <ro...@rogis.com> wrote in message
> >news:8jeuischh9ptog333...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 27 May 2000 04:00:35 +0100, "Sue_R"
> >> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
> >> >Sure thing....I just set light to my fringe....can you give me a
minute
> >> >while I put my head out? <sizzle>
> >>
> >> No,No first the Coffee. :)
> >
> >You're all heart you are...my blummin' head was on fire...I can't get on
> >with these Zippo's..
> >One lump ot two?
> >;)
>
> No sugar thanks - and no milk, can you tip a bit of that yellow thing
> you have there in tho`? :)
The custard creams are taken.
Sue_R
I didn't think you could see my zits from there?
;p
--
Sue R
Telegraph
<t_clip...@brain.hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Rogi" <ro...@rogis.com> wrote in message
What are we all doing up at this Allah-forsaken hour?
---
Tel
Gott mit Uns
baloo
> news:8gmi9k$3s0$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >
> > Manic <manic@deprčssivé.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:959353648.4650.0...@news.demon.co.uk...
> >
> > <snip>
> > >
> > > This *is* spooky.
> > >
> > > While we're on the subject, I'd like to congratulate the police on
> taking
> > > over a year to round up this 'well known local nutter' who lived
> just a
> > few
> > > blocks away.
> > >
> >
> > Ever heard of a thing called *evidence* ?
> >
> > The old bill are criticised when they arrest people without evidence,
> and
> > here you are criticising them when they wait till they get it !
> >
> > Baloo
> >
> >
> No, it's acceptable in law to arrest people on reasonable suspicion.
> When you have evidence you go a step further & charge them. That's why
> the Lawrence enquiry criticised the police for not arresting the Acourts
> etc. as soon as there was reasonable suspicion based on witness reports
> etc. i.e. within 24 hours. That would have enabled them to search the
> homes & gardens for evidence which might still have been there at that
> against friend Bulsara they would have charged him by now.. They're
> hoping for a confession and / or forensics from his habitat. That's why
> they originally had 36 hours only after which they had to apply for an
> extension of custody (which they got) and they can now hold him for
> another couple of days. And if they then release him (which is my bet)
> would have done no harm for the Police to keep quiet while they sussed
> out if he really is a contender.
> If you ever want to sue for wrongful arrest it won't be enough to show
> that the Police had no evidence against you, you'll have to show absence
> of reasonable grounds for suspicion
> --
> John Dean -- Oxford
> I am anti-spammed -- defrag me to reply
> john...@msn.com
>
>
>
I'm well aware of the legal position John, but the point I was making is
that police are criticised whichever avenue they decide to take in this
enquiry. There are many reasons why he would not be arrested when it comes
to light that he is a suspect.
Baloo
tiny
news:392f47b9...@news.ukgateway.net...
Mostly icqing people I know and being rude to everyone.
>Kat<
Rogi <ro...@rogis.com> who squeaked:
>On Sat, 27 May 2000 01:55:24 +0100, "Sue_R"
><sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>John Dean <john...@fragmsn.com> wrote in message
>>news:8gn4ec$lp$1...@supernews.com...
>>> against friend Bulsara they would have charged him by now.. They're
>>> hoping for a confession and / or forensics from his habitat. That's why
>>> they originally had 36 hours only after which they had to apply for an
>>> extension of custody (which they got) and they can now hold him for
>>> another couple of days. And if they then release him (which is my bet)
>>> the greed for favourable publicity will have ruined the guy's life.
>>From what I can glean, the police were at his house six weeks ago taking
>>computer equipment away for examination. As far as publicity goes; the man
>>thrived on it. I've met him, and to see him standing outside Mercury's
>>house talking sorrowfully about his "cousin Freddie" while standing beside a
>>white stretch limo, was more than a tad ridiculous.
>>The only bit that bothers me is why he'd want (allegedly) to kill Jill
>>Dando..I can't see what the interest was....unless he was obsessed with her
>>too, but then if he was a nuisance to her, surely the police would have
>>known about him sooner..interesting..
>
>be `done` when ppl are looking to clear this up?
>
>Doesn`t look good to me. <groan> Bad news Sue, it really is.
I'm surprised that they released his name.... he hasn't been charged
yet.
What about all this sub judice stuff... should we even be talking about
it at all?
--
>Kat<
©
Sue_R
>Kat< <ka...@lineone.net> wrote in message
> I'm surprised that they released his name.... he hasn't been charged
> yet.
> What about all this sub judice stuff... should we even be talking about
> it at all?
Apparently you can say what you like as he hasn't been formally charged with
anything yet.
--
Sue R
Sue_R
> "Telegraph" <tele...@ukgoatway.net> wrote in message
> > What are we all doing up at this Allah-forsaken hour?
>
> Mostly icqing people I know and being rude to everyone.
Especially me, you buger....hehe!
--
Sue R
Zobo Kolonie
<959353648.4650.0...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>
>While we're on the subject, I'd like to congratulate the police on taking
>over a year to round up this 'well known local nutter' who lived just a few
>blocks away.
>
There's only one local nutter around here thank you very much!
Bastardo!
http://www.kolonie.dircon.co.uk/lnutter/
Icky stalkers and gunmen et al do not qualify as local nutters.
So there.
ZK
John Dean
> > news:8gmi9k$3s0$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > >
> > > Manic <manic@deprčssivé.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:959353648.4650.0...@news.demon.co.uk...
> > > > "Sue_R" <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:8gm1vm$88v$1...@supernews.com...
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > This *is* spooky.
> > > >
on
> > taking
> > > > over a year to round up this 'well known local nutter' who lived
> > just a
> > > few
> > > > blocks away.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The old bill are criticised when they arrest people without
evidence,
> > and
> > > here you are criticising them when they wait till they get it !
> > >
> > > Baloo
> > >
> > >
> > No, it's acceptable in law to arrest people on reasonable suspicion.
>
is
> that police are criticised whichever avenue they decide to take in
this
> enquiry. There are many reasons why he would not be arrested when it
comes
> to light that he is a suspect.
>
> Baloo
>
>
this one is that a murder takes place in broad daylight of a well-known
person, they saturate the area with resources looking for clues /
evidence / witnesses (remember the newsreel shots from last year? Cops
on the rooftops, Cops in the drains?) and leaked all manner of ''leads''
(Serbs, Hitmen, Stalkers) without, it is now obvious, any good reason to
do so, and every time they pick someone up, someone in the squad
immediately tips off the media. Then they release their 'suspect' and
all goes quiet again for a few months. We'll probably never hear any
more about this guy. If we do e.g. if he goes to trial, I would be V.
interested to know what compelling reason the Police had for arresting
him *now* that didn't exist 6 weeks ago (or last year for that matter)
Desporad©
Zobo Kolonie <kol...@popmail.SPAMSUCKSdircon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fqNX4.1115$6T1.2...@news.dircon.co.uk...
taking
> >over a year to round up this 'well known local nutter' who lived
just a few
> >blocks away.
> >
> There's only one local nutter around here thank you very much!
> Bastardo!
>
> http://www.kolonie.dircon.co.uk/lnutter/
>
> Icky stalkers and gunmen et al do not qualify as local nutters.
>
> So there.
>
> ZK
>
>
http://www.btinternet.com/~dansia/zobo.htm
yes you are scary ZK
:)
Desporad©.
www.desporado.com
The site with 'toooons' and some .
tiny
Still no good enough for the full insult?
Sue_R
tiny <t_clip...@brain.hotmail.com> wrote in
> Still no good enough for the full insult?
I was fighting you til 4.30 this morning! You've worn me out!
Slave-driver...
--
Sue R
>Kat<
Rogi <ro...@rogis.com> who squeaked:
>In A Democracy.(Though have in mind the usual slander/libel/defamation
>things).
So much for an unbiased jury....
--
>Kat<
©
Zobo Kolonie
ZK
Sue_R
> realise we had got to the point of "we can`t find the perp - right who
> is the nearest thing" Stupid. `Lets arrest someone, anyone!- who is
> nearest, oh, that muso with the stickers looks good....I bet he knows
> how to make modifications to cartridges...` LOL! Try it on ppl. We`ll
> have a field day.....
He's just been charged with the murder....this will be interesting...
--
Sue R
Desporad©
> On Sun, 28 May 2000 11:12:54 +0100, Keyser Soze
> <mrkeys...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >He may have a point Rogi :-)
>
> I`m not talking about this anymore, ta very much lol....:)
>
> --
> Rogi.
Suspect now charged......with her murder...
--
'; 3)
--
timi the tosspot
> Rogi <ro...@rogis.com> wrote in message
>news:c632js8tq8tt4k6kf...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 28 May 2000 11:12:54 +0100, Keyser Soze
>> <mrkeys...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>> >He may have a point Rogi :-)
>> I`m not talking about this anymore, ta very much lol....:)
>Suspect now charged......with her murder...
so many different views.
me, i agree with rogi..
many reasons, none easy to explain.
i do not feel comfortable with this one.
and i have known others in the past with the same aroma.
it's easy to place a smell upon a pair of trousers,
but it soon wears off.
what you need to find is the stain which made the nasty smell.
"if you want to"
oh yes.
Desporad©
timi the tosspot <tim....@rsole.btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:8grr81$cnp$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...
timi the tosspot
>err..
it is difficult.
what would you do if you were him.
what would you do if you had to find someone like him.
what would you do if you were me
what would you do if you were rogi.
what would you do if it was jena.
what would you do if my head exploded .......
ohdearbang.....splutchcht.
Desporad©
> Desporad© wrote in message
> >err..
> it is difficult.
> what would you do if you were him.
say I didn't do it
> what would you do if you had to find someone like him.
ask some one if they'd done it
> what would you do if you were me
ask me If you had double vision
> what would you do if you were rogi.
I would call myself rogi
> what would you do if it was jena.
Ask jena if he liked being rogi
> what would you do if my head exploded .......
> ohdearbang.....splutchcht.
>
>
here...
have an alastoplast...
there, there, there....timi
Eric
<sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> writes
And wot a surprise he is unemployed. With almost every person mentioned
in the media who is wanted or arrested being unemployed, Wouldn't it be
easier just to lock em all up when they sign on.
--
Eric
timi the tosspot
>have an alastoplast...
>there, there, there....timi
can be a peersoun,
oh yes, oh yeers, ooh yeears
oh orgasmicly ooooff,
ahhh, aahhhurgghhh, yes yes yes yes !!!
thinghy, largely, or about avergaregley,
.......
.......
pardon me, i've just arrived.
Sue_R
Eric <Er...@the.viking> wrote in message
> And wot a surprise he is unemployed. With almost every person mentioned
> in the media who is wanted or arrested being unemployed, Wouldn't it be
> easier just to lock em all up when they sign on.
He's not unemployed, Eric, he's on Invalidity Benefit. Must have got injured
when he was a stuntman.
--
Sue R
Desporad©
timi the tosspot
listen, i can not be accussed of top posting.
and also dan, you look like a fuckinghandsometosser2me,
but, no i am not a posh blokee,
and bye gawed, i'll slashed a slplashed a sploshed;
as long as its sticcky.
or, if it involves ladies private parts,
thats another story.
>> >have an alastoplast...
Eric
<sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> writes
>
>Eric <Er...@the.viking> wrote in message
>> And wot a surprise he is unemployed. With almost every person mentioned
>> in the media who is wanted or arrested being unemployed, Wouldn't it be
>> easier just to lock em all up when they sign on.
>
>He's not unemployed, Eric, he's on Invalidity Benefit.
Sorry I stand corrected. Ivb thats the one you go on when you've run out
of excused as to why you've not got a job.
--
Eric
Sue_R
> interested to know what compelling reason the Police had for arresting
> him *now* that didn't exist 6 weeks ago (or last year for that matter)
I don't see how he can be charged with murder...he's clearly unbalanced and
lives in a fantasy world. To watch him outside Freddie Mercury's house, as
I did, signing autographs and accepting sympathy from people who thought he
was a relative, shows he wasn't all there. He had his hair slicked back like
Mercury's and it was obvious he was trying to look like him. He even had a
journalist from a cable TV company go round the block with him in this white
stretch limo for an interview. *If* he did do it, I wonder if it had
anything to do with the fact he was supposed to be an ardent Princess Diana
fan and JD was often compared to her....you never know what goes through
someone like that's mind. I suppose I find it all the more fascinating
because I've met him.
--
Sue R
Alistair Mann
So I've heard as well, allowing the govt of the day to get you out of the
employment numbers without actually getting you into employment. Mind, they
do consider 3% unemployment to be "full employment". What cheeky scoundrels
they are!
--
Alistair Mann
Sue_R
Eric <Er...@the.viking> wrote in message
news:xyHJGBAJ...@pygmy.demon.co.uk...
> In article <8gs1m3$ja9$1...@supernews.com>, Sue_R
> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> writes
>
> Sorry I stand corrected. Ivb thats the one you go on when you've run out
> of excused as to why you've not got a job.
He did have a job once..stuntman, Queen roadie, 'cousin to the stars'....the
choice is yours ;)
--
Sue R
Dot
writes
>
>And wot a surprise he is unemployed. With almost every person mentioned
>in the media who is wanted or arrested being unemployed, Wouldn't it be
>easier just to lock em all up when they sign on.
You are William Hague AICMFP!!!
--
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)
Dot
>> in the media who is wanted or arrested being unemployed, Wouldn't it be
>> easier just to lock em all up when they sign on.
>
>when he was a stuntman.
>
Eric
<sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> writes
>
>Eric <Er...@the.viking> wrote in message
>>
>> of excused as to why you've not got a job.
>
>He did have a job once..stuntman, Queen roadie, 'cousin to the stars'....the
>choice is yours ;)
and according to the press before anyone was arrested "professional
hitman" (allegedly)
--
Eric
Sue_R
Keyser Soze <mrkeys...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:il28js8e5dqmne8b4...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 28 May 2000 23:40:39 +0100, "Sue_R"
> <sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
>
>
> >I don't see how he can be charged with murder...he's clearly unbalanced
and
> >lives in a fantasy world.
> Therefor he gets charged if there is enough to warrant it. Then all
> the mental reports get placed before the court along with the police
> evidence and someone who is allegedly wise and clever gets to point
> the jury in the right direction.
> But your point that there has to be a "mental will" for there to be
> murder is quite correct. However there are various levels.
Ah, thanks for putting me right on that. It will be very interesting to see
how this case pans out.
It will also be interesting to see what the motive was (supposing he did it,
that is).
--
Sue_R
Jim Ley
<sue_r@BUGGER_OFFlineone.net> wrote:
>
>>Kat< <ka...@lineone.net> wrote in message
>> I'm surprised that they released his name.... he hasn't been charged
>> yet.
>> What about all this sub judice stuff... should we even be talking about
>> it at all?
>
>Apparently you can say what you like as he hasn't been formally charged with
>anything yet.
Of course, unfortunately you can say, and the judge can conclude
there's no chance of a trial 'cos people have already decided his
guilt by discussing it...
Jim.
Sue_R
Jim Ley <j...@jibbering.com> wrote in message
> Of course, unfortunately you can say, and the judge can conclude
> there's no chance of a trial 'cos people have already decided his
> guilt by discussing it...
Surely sensational cases like this will always have people asking "did he?",
"didn't he?"...that's natural; doesn't mean people have decided his guilt,
though.
--
Sue_R
Jim Ley
No, but the whole discussion of guilt/innocence and the going over of
evidence, and even suggestions by people that someone is guilty will
cause problems, you've discussed it a lot, what's going to happen if
you're called up for Jury service in this case?
Jim.
Alistair Mann
news:8h341s$ko2$1...@supernews.com...
>
> Jim Ley <j...@jibbering.com> wrote in message
> > Of course, unfortunately you can say, and the judge can conclude
> > there's no chance of a trial 'cos people have already decided his
>
he?",
I can tell you the answer right now. The answer is Yes, he DID use Harmony
hairspray!
--
Alistair Mann
visit the uk.local.london website at
http://www.london-online.org.uk
Sue_R
> evidence, and even suggestions by people that someone is guilty will
> cause problems, you've discussed it a lot, what's going to happen if
> you're called up for Jury service in this case?
I doubt I'd be able to do it, being that I've met Barry Bulsara.
--
Sue_R