Reasonable Question #9 [Oxford Test]
Rick Larsen
methodologies upon which the Oxford Capacity Analysis Test is based?
Please include independent data on reliability and validity studies.
Also please advise whether the test is administered and interpreted by
registered psychologists.
[Answers / comments from Scientologists only via this NG please].
Rick Larsen
Robert Hummels
>
> Would the CoS please provide academic details of the research design
> methodologies upon which the Oxford Capacity Analysis Test is based?
> Please include independent data on reliability and validity studies.
> Also please advise whether the test is administered and interpreted by
> registered psychologists.
Wow! you said the dirty "P" word.
Now your gonna get it.....to even
suggest that one of thos "P" folks would
even be allowed into an org....tsk tsk tsk.
BTW Did you have a chance to look at the Freezone
yet?
bob
FREE SCIENTOLOGIST
Rick Larsen
are you at the top of the CoS popularity tre?
regards
R
Rick Larsen
Elizabeth Falkner wrote:
>
> My thin and healthy son Daj tried to use my old Sanyo Juicer this
> morning. It seems to make juice just fine BUT the machine itself is
> shaking like the dickens and if you don't hold it down, it gallops all
> over the table.
>
> Are we doing something wrong? Is it something we can fix or should I
> bring it to a repair shop (even though this brand hasn't been
> manufactured in a gazillion years), OR should we just get a new one?
>
> He made carrot, apple, and parsley juice. I thought it was vile.
>
> Granny Elizabeth
Duct Tape. I used to have a small juicer and it had similar
problems unless I cut the food items very small before putting
them in the juicer. Perhaps..?
Charlie
*****************************************************************
Charles Liam Gifford 32:44:58N
<>< 117:06:33W
USS PORTERFIELD DD682
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Quarters/8893
Rick Larsen
gerry armstrong
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:38:39 GMT, ri...@iinet.net.au (Rick Larsen)
wrote:
>Would the CoS please provide academic details of the research design
>methodologies upon which the Oxford Capacity Analysis Test is based?
>Please include independent data on reliability and validity studies.
>Also please advise whether the test is administered and interpreted by
>registered psychologists.
It is important to know that the really quite crazy $cientology
cultists use the results of their Oxford Capacity Analysis Test for
purposes of personality destruction, intimidation and punishment. A
$cientologist can be ordered to the cult's RPF, the slave camps
$cientology maintains in its larger bases, for indeterminate but
lengthy and very abusive sentences, for having a "low OCA."
The OCA, or "personality test," has no validity, was never researched
and is administered and interpreted by utterly unqualified
unprofessional pseudoscientific cultists. The "test" is not dangerous
in and of itself, but the use to which $cientology puts it is sick,
dangerous and possibly even deadly. It is a well known fact that Lisa
McPherson and others that have died in $cientology when they ought not
to have died all had done this "test."
(c) Gerry Armstrong
roger gonnet
gerry armstrong wrote:
>
> (p & m)
>
> On Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:38:39 GMT, ri...@iinet.net.au (Rick Larsen)
> wrote:
>
> >Would the CoS please provide academic details of the research design
> >methodologies upon which the Oxford Capacity Analysis Test is based?
> >Please include independent data on reliability and validity studies.
> >Also please advise whether the test is administered and interpreted by
> >registered psychologists.
Now you can get some independant research on OCA from my site. That's
the demonstration of how the test is completely tricked to make almost
anybody on the same range, to start with.
<http://home.worldnet.fr/gonnet/testocaenglish.htm> (with a gif showing
the results)
roger
Podkayne-Xenu
<sect...@worldnet.fr> wrote:
> Now you can get some independant research on OCA from my site. That's
> the demonstration of how the test is completely tricked to make almost
> anybody on the same range, to start with.
>
> <http://home.worldnet.fr/gonnet/testocaenglish.htm> (with a gif showing
> the results)
There's also <http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~cowen/essays/oca.html>,
which I just re-found while looking at Barb's site
<http://members.tripod.com/~bwarr/>
--
2,4,6,8 who do we enturbulate? Xenu! Xenu! Xenu!
Read more Heinlein
Robert bob Hummels
wrote:
>yes i did thanks bob.
>are you at the top of the CoS popularity tre?
If you mean SP...well no not declared yet.
I don't do any TV/Radio interviews :)
bob
>regards
>R
Rick Larsen
<JohnS...@msn.com> writes:
>This is from "ABCs of AT&T WorldNetiquette", which is what AT&T calls there
>Terms of Service policy:
>--BEGIN
>Act responsibly
>
>1. Don't use the Service to interfere with others' use of the Service >*or*
yada-yada-yada...
Basically, the rulz is, mind yer own friggin' business, do not threaten bodily
harm, do not promote/engage in illegal ventures, and do not advocate
racist/ethnic/religious/sexist attacks, period.
RFC is not a moderated newsgroup. For those thin-skinned individuals who
demand less colorful dialog there are many moderated cooking newsgroups where
they may be happier -- the internet allows those who elect, to freely move
their pristine butts to territory more to their taste.
And now for the real deal. This attack on me has absolutely nothing whatsoever
to do with use of language (lord knows, some of ya speak real funny to my
ears), it has only to do with certain pointy-headed lame brains resenting 1,
anyone who posesses information outside the realm of their own, and 2, anyone
who dares to point out when someone has posted Bullshit Information.
This ain't the first time, it won't be the last. So, go on, post yer bull
crap, when I see it I'll be sure to let everyone know, wouldn't want folks
steppin' in it... I expect the same treatment, everyone should.
And LatexDadPutz, especially for you, because you're the dumbest imbecil to hit
rfc in a very long time, KISS MY ASS! But please, first sterilize your
virolent lips.
And now I have important woik to do, I've no more time to waste on this inane
dreck.
But before I bid yoose all a good night, I gotta tell ya, I sorta like seein'
my name up in lights. And I like it when ya try to mimic me, I've heard it
said apery is the ultimate compliment. No offence to the primates. ;)
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .
Sheldon
````````````
On a recent Night Court rerun, Judge Harry Stone had a wonderful line:
"I try to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out."
gerry armstrong
(8-10 servings)
From Don's Spicy Kitchen
drk...@family-net.org
Osprey, Fl. S.W. Florida
4 lb. veal roast
2 cloves garlic, slivered
4 slices bacon
2 tbs. butter, melted
1 tsp. tetragon
1/2 tsp. salt
3/4 cup Madeira
1 lb. sliced bacon, cut into 1/4" pieces
3 onions, finely sliced
1/2 lb. mushrooms, sliced
2 cups heavy cream
Press the garlic slivers into incisions made in the roast. Lard with sliced
bacon and let stand for an hour before roasting. Brush with melted butter
and sprinkle on the tarragon and salt. Roast uncovered in a 300 degree oven
for 2 hours. Heat the Madeira and baste the roast every half hour. While
the meat is roasting, prepare the sauce. Sauté bacon until crisp. Remove
and drain on paper towels. Pour off all but 2 tbs. bacon fat and salute
onions until they are a transparent mass; being careful not to let them
brown. Add mushrooms and cook for an additional 5 minutes. When roast is
ready, remove it to a platter and keep warm. Combine bacon bits, onions,
mushrooms and cream. Cook and stir until sauce is thick. Carve the roast
and serve sauce separately.
From "Don's Spicy Kitchen."
Donald Keen (USN Retired)
Contact me at: drk...@family-net.org
Posting in alt.cake and rec.food.cooking
My ICQ number 3198023
Stand still and consider the wonderful works of God
Russell Shaw
gerry armstrong wrote in message <369ab7d0....@news.dowco.com>...
<snip>
>It is important to know that the really quite crazy $cientology
>cultists use the results of their Oxford Capacity Analysis Test for
>purposes of personality destruction, intimidation and punishment.
Sometimes the test is folded and then used to just smack the person for
hours.
> A
>$cientologist can be ordered to the cult's RPF, the slave camps
>$cientology maintains in its larger bases, for indeterminate but
>lengthy and very abusive sentences, for having a "low OCA."
The only reason I was never ordered to one of the slave camps is I knew all
the right answers (Example, # 39 is **YES** !!).
>
>The OCA, or "personality test," has no validity, was never researched
>and is administered and interpreted by utterly unqualified
>unprofessional pseudoscientific cultists. The "test" is not dangerous
>in and of itself, but the use to which $cientology puts it is sick,
>dangerous and possibly even deadly. It is a well known fact that Lisa
>McPherson and others that have died in $cientology when they ought not
>to have died all had done this "test."
Great point, Gerry. You did, however fail to point out that it is ALSO true
that everyone who now drinks water is going to die.
__
I started out with nothing... I still have most of it.
It just doesn't get any better - than a post from Russell Shaw, Phoenix.