Faster Than Light data transmission lines..............................................................
Mathew Orman
by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
Government scientific lab.
They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
The result of the verification will be published
at: www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
Sincerely,
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
Jim
>........... are now pending independent verifications
No they aren't.
>by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
>Government scientific lab.
>They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
>particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
No they aren't.
>
>The result of the verification will be published
>at: www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
No it won't.
>
>Sincerely,
Not likely.
>
>Mathew Orman
One true statement.
Jim
Robert J. Kolker
Mathew Orman wrote:
> ........... are now pending independent verifications
> by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
> Government scientific lab.
> They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
> particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
Horse feathers. You are a loon and a fraud.
Bob Kolker
Uncle Al
>
> ........... are now pending independent verifications
> by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
> Government scientific lab.
> They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
> particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
[snip]
Bullshit.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
Randy Poe
> ........... are now pending independent verifications
> by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
> Government scientific lab.
> They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
> particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
Makes one wonder what the real story is, who the "group of
scientists" really are and what purported "US Government
scientific lab" they are associated with.
>
> The result of the verification will be published
> at: www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
I look forward to it.
- Randy
Eric Prebys
> ........... are now pending independent verifications
> by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
> Government scientific lab.
> They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
> particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
>
You've just crossed the line from moron to liar.
> The result of the verification will be published
> at: www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
>
Yes, scientists at major US Government scientific labs are very
fond of "publishing" at kook websites, particularly scientists
with no names who work at labs that don't exist.
-Eric
Mathew Orman
It is pending!
Here is the initial email that I've received.
The name and email address is removed for obvious reasons.
//------------------------------
Dear Dr. Orman,
I have recently become aware through your discussions on
Usenet of your efforts to gain acceptance by the scientific
community of your claim of invention of an FTL transmission
device. I am a scientist affiliated with a large US government
research lab, and have equipment and resources available at
my disposal to verify your claims. Our research group is
particularly interested in your device, if it performs as
specified, since it would be an enabling component of an
apparatus which is currently under consideration. We would
be interested in purchasing a moderate quantity of the 10m
1 MBit/sec cable.
Unfortunately, our purchasing department is unwilling to
process my requisition, since the buyers are required to
demonstrate that your company will deliver at the lowest
cost from at least 3 competing bids. I have attempted to
justify to the buyer that your company would be a sole-source
provider, however, speaking frankly, he is skeptical that
the device functions as specified.
Since these cables would significantly improve the resolution
of our detector, I am willing to make some effort to push
this requisition through. If you would be willing to send
our group a sample cable, I would be able to demonstrate to
Purchasing that the cables work as advertised.
In addition, if the cables do function, I would be more than
happy to send you a set of lab results documenting the
performance of the cable. I imagine that photographs of
the setup and printouts of the oscilloscope traces would
be sufficient, however feel free to suggest additional
materials as you believe are necessary. These documents
would be signed by staff at the laboratory, including
possibly a Nobel Prize winner, and notarized by the county,
which would make the documents traceable through the US
government. I imagine that such materials might be helpful
to you in your efforts, if you are unable to make progress
with Agilent. Incidentally, I will speak with my contacts
in Agilent regarding your device.
Please let me know if we can come to an arrangement. Also,
if you are able to make progress with Agilent, I would
greatly appreciate it if you would send me contact
information for the researcher involved, since this would
simplify my purchasing efforts.
Best wishes,
xxxxx xxxxxxxxx
xxx...@earthlink.net
//------------------------------
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
Eric Gisse
Orman) wrote:
>........... are now pending independent verifications
You said that 2 months ago.
>by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
>Government scientific lab.
A major gub'mnt lab? Which one? What are the credentials of that
group of scientists? Who do they work for?
>They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
>particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
So vague, yet it is almost plausable. How about some technical
details?
>
>The result of the verification will be published
>at: www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
Said that 2 months ago too.
Eric Gisse
Orman) wrote:
>rpo...@yahoo.com (Randy Poe) wrote in message news:<585ab5d8.03061...@posting.google.com>...
>> or...@tyrellinnovations.com (Mathew Orman) wrote in message news:<e270b260.03061...@posting.google.com>...
>> > ........... are now pending independent verifications
>> > by group of scientist in Mountain View, CA. associated with major US
>> > Government scientific lab.
>> > They are planning to use the FTL data transfer technology in new
>> > particle accelerator as a component of new type of detector.
>>
>> Makes one wonder what the real story is, who the "group of
>> scientists" really are and what purported "US Government
>> scientific lab" they are associated with.
>>
>> >
>> > The result of the verification will be published
>> > at: www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
>>
>> I look forward to it.
>>
>> - Randy
>
>
>
>
>It is pending!
>Here is the initial email that I've received.
>The name and email address is removed for obvious reasons.
Yea. They are obvious. The man is not real.
>
>
>//------------------------------
>Dear Dr. Orman,
Since when did you get a doctorate? Have you been lying to this man,
if he even exists?
<snip>
Double-A
Probably from the same mail order "university" where Dr. Min got his PhD!
Double-A
Eric Prebys
"Mathew Orman" <or...@tyrellinnovations.com> wrote in message
news:e270b260.03061...@posting.google.com...
Well, if Orman were making it up, I suspect he would have
had the people actually paying for the cables. I suspect
that some SLAC or LBL guys had been tipping a few
and are playing a little joke on him.
> Best wishes,
> xxxxx xxxxxxxxx
> xxx...@earthlink.net
> //------------------------------
Since when do "scientists at US government laboratories" use earthlink.net
for official communication??
-Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mathew Orman
>
> www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
> www.radio-faster-than-light.com
Laurel Amberdine
>
<snip>
>
>> xxx...@earthlink.net
>> //------------------------------
>
> Since when do "scientists at US government laboratories" use earthlink.net
> for official communication??
No kidding. And obviously someone with a comcast email is nothing but
trouble. ;) (Kidding. Yes, I know this isn't official communication! Is
it just me or are more people arguing with you since your email changed?
Or maybe you're arguing more with them. ;) )
-Laurel
Randy Poe
BTW, Mathew continues to receive international publicity
in another forum. He is quoted at length in James Randi's
web column of June 13, 2003: http://www.randi.org/jr/061303.html
The quote is not attributed except as "an example of what
usually passes before my eyes, spelling and all" but the
style and content are unmistakable. It seems Mathew is
in the negotiation stage of a stab at the $1 Million
Paranormal Challenge.
- Randy
Mathew Orman
"Randy Poe" <rpo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:585ab5d8.0306...@posting.google.com...
Randi is going to have to make some hard decisions.
If he continues to believe that FTL is a paranormal phenomena than he will
have to pay out his $1 Million.
On the other hand if he accepts FTL as the fact of physical reality than he
will have to declare a war against Eisteiners and family.
Today I got a email from the scientist that is conducting the independent
verification of my FTL data transmission line.
He stated that the results should be ready within few days.
Jim
wrote:
No he won't.
>If he continues to believe that FTL is a paranormal phenomena than he will
>have to pay out his $1 Million.
No he won't.
>On the other hand if he accepts FTL as the fact of physical reality than he
>will have to declare a war against Eisteiners and family.
No he won't.
>
>Today I got a email from the scientist that is conducting the independent
>verification of my FTL data transmission line.
No you didn't.
>He stated that the results should be ready within few days.
No he didn't.
>
>Sincerely,
Not likely.
>
>Mathew Orman
One true statement?
Jim
Uncle Al
[snip]
> Today I got a email from the scientist that is conducting the independent
> verification of my FTL data transmission line.
> He stated that the results should be ready within few days.
Christ is coming back, too. Until then, Elvis is King.
Mathew Orman
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:3EEE2DE3...@hate.spam.net...
I like Elvis too!
matthewwinstone
"Mathew Orman" <or...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bclbjk$5ef$1...@news.onet.pl...
>
> > Uncle Al
> > http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> > "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
>
> I like Elvis too!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mathew Orman
> www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
> www.radio-faster-than-light.com
>
>
Is it safe to use at home on my computer??
Mathew Orman
"matthewwinstone" <dalt...@nemr.net> wrote in message
news:bclj9b$bh7$1...@ins22.netins.net...
Yes, it is.
But there are no advantages in using it for ordinary data transfer.
It is way much cheaper to use conventional systems like USB, IEEE1394 or
etc.
Currently group of scientist is considering FTL cable implementation in
their new
design of particle detector designated for usage in particle accelerator.
Jim
wrote:
>
>"matthewwinstone" <dalt...@nemr.net> wrote in message
>news:bclj9b$bh7$1...@ins22.netins.net...
>>
>> "Mathew Orman" <or...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:bclbjk$5ef$1...@news.onet.pl...
>> >
>> > > Uncle Al
>> > > http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
>> > > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
>> > > "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
>> >
>> > I like Elvis too!
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Mathew Orman
>> > www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
>> > www.radio-faster-than-light.com
>> >
>> >
>> This is a completely extravagant idea, totally revolutionary.
>>
>> Is it safe to use at home on my computer??
>>
>>
>
>
>Yes, it is.
>But there are no advantages in using it for ordinary data transfer.
One true statement.
Jim