everyone has gone mad.
jet
<tri...@spam.sucks> wrote:
>This dude, "jet" morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net, in message
><a90bfi$s5v$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>, said the following tripped out
>things....
<trippy,jet,trippy,jet. Repeat as needed>
>> [outrageous line count]
>{cope with it}
No thanks, I'll continue going
[snip]
That's what those things (below) in brackets are; a summary of the things
being snipped, not a response to you.
[...]
>> Anyone who calls me vapid is an idiot. I'm many things but insipid
>> isn't one of them. Boring, maybe; even specious, but not vapid.
>
>Too bad vapid is exactly what you sounded like. Way to be what you hate.
>
YDKWWMDY. "talking shit about someone" is not a vapid thing to do.
>> >Well, I guess not now. That was your choice, not mine. Remember that.
>> >
>> It was -my- choice that you jumped into a flame war between me and a
>> couple other people in full attack mode? Damn, I got the power.
>
>No, it was *your* choice to spout off about how you were gonna bring
>your buddies and educate APFR on what's fun and what isn't. It was
>
Continue the Big Lie. Lame trolls have educated you well, Grasshopper.
>*your* choice to be pissy with me when I was more than content to just
>have a rational discussion with you.
>
All you've been doing is screaming "you made a -threat-" and "Dana, spooge
and *everyone* else can kick your ass".
[...]
>> >It hurts you Jet, because it makes you look like a backstabber. It also
>> >
>> No, I stabbed them right up front.
>
>By shooting yourself in the foot over and over again? Interesting
>technique. Way to show the kids what NOT to do in a flamewar.
>
Please make up your mind. Either I stabbed them in the back or shot myself
in the foot. Pointing out that usenet connects to RL is not shooting
myself in the foot, nor is saying that an endless stream of billing and
cooing between two people is very boring (something others have pointed
out as well).
>> I've thought Dana, in particular, was
>> a moron, since the very first post of his I ever read. As a matter of
>> fact, despite his claims of debating rings around veryone in nanap, most
>> people outside of his small circle of trolls, think he's a gibbering
>> idiot.
>
>Wow, a circle jerk in a nana* froup, who'da thunk it? Now I know where
>you learned self-importance as a posting style.
>
Ah, now I get it. You're one of those.
>> I think the hyping of Greg and Miscreant's romance, immediately after the
>> months of spooning and mooning with Rocky (someone I'm quite fond of) is
>> about as tasteless as anything I've ever seen; not because it hurts Rocky
>> but because it's so obliviously tactless.
>
>Guess what jet, I've talked to all, ALL of the ones involved on a
>regular basis. Rocky's not hurting for new prospects,
>
That's what I said: "not because it hurts Rocky".
and it's not like
>Miscreant/Greg are doing their thing to be pricks.
>
They are right now. <g> At first it was kind of *sweet*, and then the
gag reflexes took over.
>Way to not get over a relationship you didn't have, you goofy ass
>netl00n.
>
If they're going to make it the highest volume thread in two groups, it's
going to get commented on, much like the Kate goes postal over the break
up with OpI thread.
>> HTH.
>
>Oh, it did. It helped me see what a fucking freak you are.
>
How's that? Dana -is- known a a high volume, lame sock puppet and Greg
and Misc -have- been posting volumes about their great love, and the
predominant responses I've seen have been to tell them to get a room. I'm
sure you can explain how commenting on that makes me a freak, starting
here:
---------start lucid explanation--------
>> >makes you look unstable, because you go off on these little binges of
>> >what you think is flaming, when in reality, it's just you pissing and
>> >moaning about what other people write.
>> >
>> Flaming -is- just pissing and moaning about what other people write,
>> but with a bit of style.
>
>Well, if that's what you think it is, that explains why you lose so
>badly at it.
>
So what is -your- opposing definition of flaming?
[...]
>> >Well, now you look like the dumbest thing this side of Kate.
>> >Congratulations. Is that what you wanted? Probably not.
>> >
>> I'm not particularly concerned that you think so, if that's what you're
>> asking.
>
>Not really. Just spelling it out for you, oh clue impaired one.
>
You haven't provided the slightest reference for your conclusion, yet. You
can list the quotes that make me the dumbest thing since Kate here:
--------begin list-----------
I'm sorry I have to do this but you never seem to back up what you say.
When asked, you say you don't have time to explain, even though you have
time to write an 800 line post. Now, let's see the logic you claim you've
been using.
>> Since I don't to any elite flame/flonk in-group, I doubt anyone
>> cares about my rep.
>
><Joan Jett>
>I don't give a damn 'bout my bad reputation
>
I've never been afraid of any deviation
And I don't really care
If ya think I'm strange
I ain't gonna change
And I'm never gonna care
'Bout my bad reputation
></Joan Jett>
>
Funny, I was just joking with someone about that being the theme they
should use for my section of their webpage.
[ikyabwai]
>> If you can show that I think I'm the sole arbiter of what's UPA, I'll
>> happily take the short bus. I would think my regular disclaimers, stating
>> that I'm -not- would have been a pretty good clue, even for you.
>
>******
>
>> >> >> Someone who's been around from the beginning of it and knows what it
>> >> >> isn't.
>
>*******
>
>Ask not for whom the bus honks, it honks for you.
>
Where's the part about being the *sole arbiter*?
>> >> When I expressed my opinion and made no claims about
>> >> anyone else's opinion.
>> >
>> >When you take your opinion, and try to make it sound like the official
>> >opinion of the flonk.
[ha]
>> Official? You've lost your mind.
>
>No, you've lost your mind, for taking your opinion and saying that's the
>way it should be.
>
Why shouldn't I have an opinion about the way it should be? I'm not
cancelling or netcopping anyone who has other views.
>> >> C'mon, boy, Flonkers aren't supposed to be so dim.
>> >
>> >No, they aren't, but then again, you aren't much of a flonker.
>> >
>> I've heard the battle cry of the War Geese and dreamed of them flying
>> south in winter.
>
>Uh........you coming back to earth anytime soon?
>
A Flonker would have understood.
>> Spooge
>> >may be right, the only reason you're even there is so you can try to
>> >pick a fight with DB6/Petitmorte posters.
>> >
>> Um, the only such posters I'm aware of are RussellB and spooge and I've
>> been here longer that either DB6 or petitmorte have existed.
>
>So you're saying that DB6 and petitmorte have only 2 posters?
>
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!
>
No, I just said "the only such posters I'm aware of [here] are RussellB
and spooge. If there are more, they're either killfiled or I just don't
read them. I have no idea how many posters DB6 has and people can't post
from petitmorte.
-------start list of other db6 posters here-----------
Obviously, I didn't come "here" to flame DB6ers, if I was "here" before
they were. That makes spooge wrong (about what you said above). Clear now?
>> You don't really add anything
>> >other than meager attempts to draw heat for your little flamewars, in
>> >which everyone kicks your ass through your head.
>> >
>> You must live in a different dimension than I do. RussellB and Rocky
>> blew me out of the water but, I can't, offhand, think of anyone else.
>
>Try EVERYONE else, that might jog your memory a little better.
>
Hmmmm. Nope. RussellB and Rocky are it.
>> [...]
>> >> -I've- never claimed to be a usenet performance artist.
>> >
>> >Then why are you in UPA groups?
>> >
>> It's where the cute doods are.
>
>That makes sense, because it sure as hell isn't because you do anything
>UPA related.
>
That's a matter of opinion, isn't it?
>> > Why do you care what people post about
>> >UPA or don't post UPA? You don't. You jut lay low, and go psycho at
>> >bizarre times, thinking that makes you some sort of flame warrior. It
>> >doesn't. It makes you look like a psycho going off at bizarre times.
>> >
>> and that is incompatible with UPA in what way?
>
>Infinity
>Bonk
[repeat 4 times]
>
Is that supposed to be UPA? Could someone with experience in UPA explain
it to me?
[...]
>> >Lately, no. I've just been hanging out, and I don't do cascades a whole
>> >lot, but I have done it. Some of it worked, some of it bombed, but hey,
>> >at least I've done it,
>> >
>> Who hasn't?
>
>You.
>
I've participated in cascades.
>> >which is a hell of a lot more than I can say for
>> >someone who sits on the sidelines whining about what others do.
>> >
>> -Now- I get it. Participating in cascades makes you a Usenet Performance
>> Artist. Color me informed.
>
>Infinity
>Bonk
[repeat 4 more times]
>
Still need clarification. You're such a good UPArtist that I'm completely
perplexed.
>> [...]
>> >> I'm very good at playing.
>> >
>> >You haven't proven that by a long shot. You're welcome to keep trying
>> >though, I'm sure it'll amuse someone, sometime.
>> >
>> It's a very sad person who thinks one has to be graded on play.
>
>Do you always have this stunning lack of logic? Can you even follow the
>sentences on your screen?
>
Sentence synopsis:
1. I'm good at playing
2. You haven't proven it, but keep trying
3. It's a sad person who thinks play is graded (ref: proof must be
provided)
Please point out the lack of logic here:
--------begin-------------
>> YM Dana, known as the lamest, noisiest babbling sock on usenet and Mis "I
>> hate flaming" creant?
>
>Funny how nobody's backing you up on that. Go figure.
>
Other than dvus, tm, Meat-->Plow and a couple of Flonkers, ym (re: Dana)?
Mis is the one who said she hates flaming.
[stuff]
>> It's
>> not proper flamer etiquette, I know, but I believe in jumping over the
>> net and shaking the winner's hand.
>
>Somehow, the trite concession speech missed my newsreader when Spooge
>and Dowap, and Meat->Plow, and Dana kicked your ass through your head,
>
I doubt many people think spooge kicked anything, but I'm sure he has his
own audience supporting him. Dowap has never won a flame war with anyone.
Meat-->Plow and I haven't had a flame war, as such, and he apologised for
the 2 completely out of line things he said a year ago. Dana calling me a
crack whore and claiming he wins because he made me *not* reply, is not
kicking my head, I assure you. In fact his stream of posts about me, after
I stopped replying to him, shows he's lost it. He's beginning to sound
like Kate.
[I -did- spank you. Didtoodidtoodidtoo.]
>> >you're gonna do what you always do, flame out, then lay low, then crawl
>> >out of the woodwork when it doesn't sting so bad, or when Hannigan
>> >decides to show his fat fucking face again, whichever.
>> >
>> Eh? This one I'm going to insist you post proof of. You don't even have
>> to prove "always". Once or twice will do.
>
>Why would I need google, when I have the power of observation? You want
>to go google shit so bad, go ahead. You'll prove me right sooner or
>later anyway. Probably sooner.
>
Spank.
[...]
>...slut.
>
Deja vu?
>> [you did -too- say you -were- going to burn down ap-fr]
>
>I did? Really? When?
>
That's the part of your response that I snipped. It's a traditional
usenet use of bracketed comments.
Whoosh again.
>> >> Yeah, I know. You're the one who said I've been carrying on a war with
>> >> DB6 and petitmorte for years. That was all the info I needed to know
>> >> you're clueless.
>> >
>> >Go to google(the posts search) and type in Jet Spooge Dowap Meat->Plow.
>> >I don't even need to do it and I can see hundreds of posts. Naw, you
>> >
>> How many did I make?
>
>Enough.
>
Spank.
>> >don't have a flamewar going with them, really. Any silence is just a
>> >lull until it starts up again.
>> >
>> Find one before about March of last year.
>>
You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte prior
to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for "years".
>> [Dana, Misc and Greg making a fool of me. *Snarf*]
>
>Earth to Jet.....Come in Jet......Earth to Jet......Helloooooooooo......
>
It's [snipped] material.
>> >> Explain. I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
>> >> and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill. G'head,
>> >> I'll wait...
>> >
>> >Unlike you, I don't need to snivel.
>> >
>> Evasion. Try again.
>
>Psst.......try looking below this line.
>
>> >As for the crossposting, I said you could do it. I merely asked why
>> >would you? It served no purpose other to drag people in it who have
>
>Now that wasn't so hard, was it?
>
Try again: I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill.
[...]
>> BTW, it didn't drag a single person from any support group into it.
>> They know how to ignore.
>
>Oh, is that what happened? You only chilled out because they didn't want
>to be a part of it? That should tell you something.
>
Where does it say that's why I "chilled"? I said that my posts didn't
drag anyone from the support groups into the war.
>> >better things to do, like recover, just so you could lose badly to
>> >spooge anyway.
>> >
>> According to whom?
>
>Anyone who can see the threads?
>
----------list--------------
[yet another in a long line of ikyabwai]
>> >just don't rate that kind of attention. Now, dry those tears, buck up,
>> >and throw yet another text base temper tantrum because someone else with
>> >a stronger grasp of logic than you, has punked you out.
>> >
>> *looks around*
>>
>> Surely you aren't referring to yourself?
>
>Is there another poster named trippy destroying you in this thread?
>
There isn't even one.
>> >> >Whatever.
>> >> >
>> >> Don't sulk. You're making a lot of stupid mistakes, but I'm still being
>> >> fairly polite.
>> >
>> >Shit, I don't need to sulk.
>> >
>> Awww. Coochie coo.
>
>Can you at least try and pretend that you can follow a thread?
>
*whoosh in a PKBish manner*
>> The statement 'everyone has been hysterical at some time' is about as
>> accurate as 'everyone has had a heart attack'. Hysteria is a specific
>> emotional and physiological condition and isn't nearly as common as
>> you think.
>
>Riiiiiiight, spin out that denial, no fear girl.
>
Fear isn't hysteria.
[yak]
>> >> When you have to tell anyone that you're being sarcastic, you aren't
>> >> doing it right.
>> >
>> >Well, it did save me the effort of reading through your bluster about
>> >how I'm not supposed to dictate who posts what, even though you asked me
>> >to, so it was worth it.
>> >
>> *whoosh*
>
>Yeah, I'm not surprised that you don't get it.
>
I don't speak gobbledygook. I'd explain how the part about you having to
approve my posts is sarcasm but, as I've said, that means it's being done
wrong. I'll just say *whoosh* again.
>> [...]
>> >> >Gain a kl00, and you won't see my sarcasm again, well, until the next
>> >> >time you run your keyboard off without knowing what the hell you're
>> >> >talking about.
>> >> >
>> >> So tell me, wise one, what is it that I don't know about, in this thread?
>> >
>> >That would take longer than I have time for.
>> >
>> Uh huh. Backed yourself into a corner, again.
>
>No, it really would take longer than I have time for. You're pretty
>clueless.
>
I'm not asking for the complete set, just the ones that explain the things
I've said that show I don't know what I'm talking about in this thread.
TIA.
[...]
>> >> >Then I'm sure you'll find a place for yourself somewhere.
>> >> >
>> >> Keep them cliche replies coming, sweetheart. They're all your usenet
>> >> dreams are made of.
>> >
>> ><Translation>
>> >
>> >"That was good, and I don't have a pithy comeback for it."
>> >
>> ></Translation>
>> >
>> Well, no. I was just tired of saying IKYABWAI.
>
>But yet you have no qualms about posting long versions of them.
>
None at all. It's a nice break from having to repeat it to you, over and
over.
>> >Sure thing, slut.
>> >
>> Ooooooh. A tough guy.
>
>Try not to cream because someone called you slut, k?
>
It's been done before and by a more competent flamer than you'll ever be.
You must have missed how ineffective it was.
[...]
>> >> I was quite obviously referring to Dana and misc (see above) but, yes,
>> >> I've killfiled most petitmorte and DB6 posters (the few that are left).
>> >> I read RussellB's and Meat-->Plow's posts. I've replied to spooge once
>> >> in several weeks. Who else do you have in mind?
>> >
>> >I'm sure given enough time, I could blow that claim all to hell. I'd
>> >make it a project, but you aren't really worth that much attention.
>> >
>> A few examples from the last few months would be adequate. Spooge ducked
>> out when I asked him, too.
>
>Why go to google when I can see it for myself. I'm surprised you managed
>to restrain yourself when spooge showed up in this thread, but we'll
>see. Time tells all. Tickticktickticktick.
>
Bring the examples or retract.
[You -did- say you friends were going to attack. *sob*]
[I don't know what a diatribe is.]
[I don't know what a rhetorical question is.]
>> A rhetorical question is not a threat you mindless cretin.
>
>Rhetorical question my ass.
>
>> If that's the
>> reason you started masturbaiting over this thread, you've wasted time and
>> a perfectly good wank.
>
>I just said bring your buddies and come "educate" me.
>
Why would I do that? That's what *Dana* is going to do (and go round and
round and round in the circle game).
[defensive posturing about masturbation.]
>> You've been added to my list of people who aren't worth the piss it
>> would take to drown them and I've added a big 'R' behind your name.
>
>Riiiiiiiight. See you in the next reply.
>
and here it is. You're still on the worthless list and flagged as
retarded.
--
jet mhm 32x30 |
wee saul disciple #32 |
ich bin ein meower |
<affinity>
jet wrote:
>
>
> >> I think the hyping of Greg and Miscreant's romance, immediately after the
> >> months of spooning and mooning with Rocky (someone I'm quite fond of) is
> >> about as tasteless as anything I've ever seen; not because it hurts Rocky
> >> but because it's so obliviously tactless.
Amen.
> >Guess what jet, I've talked to all, ALL of the ones involved on a
> >regular basis. Rocky's not hurting for new prospects,
> >
> That's what I said: "not because it hurts Rocky".
I just hope these people don't breed.
--
__
/\ \
/ \ \
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/______ffinity
trippy
> In article <MPG.171e70c85...@news.alt.net>, trippy
> <tri...@spam.sucks> wrote:
> >This dude, "jet" morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net, in message
> ><a90bfi$s5v$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>, said the following tripped out
> >things....
> <trippy,jet,trippy,jet. Repeat as needed>
> >> [outrageous line count]
> >{cope with it}
> No thanks, I'll continue going
> [snip]
> That's what those things (below) in brackets are; a summary of the things
> being snipped, not a response to you.
No shit? Really? Gosh Jet, thanks. Where would I be without your divine
guidance?
Pssst....that was more sarcasm.
>
> [...]
> >> Anyone who calls me vapid is an idiot. I'm many things but insipid
> >> isn't one of them. Boring, maybe; even specious, but not vapid.
> >
> >Too bad vapid is exactly what you sounded like. Way to be what you hate.
> >
> YDKWWMDY. "talking shit about someone" is not a vapid thing to do.
>
No, you misguided fool, talking shit *to* people may not qualify as
vapid. Talking shit *about* someone almost certainly does. Guess I know
what words mean better than you.
> >> >Well, I guess not now. That was your choice, not mine. Remember that.
> >> >
> >> It was -my- choice that you jumped into a flame war between me and a
> >> couple other people in full attack mode? Damn, I got the power.
> >
> >No, it was *your* choice to spout off about how you were gonna bring
> >your buddies and educate APFR on what's fun and what isn't. It was
> >
> Continue the Big Lie.
It's your words, and your backpedal. Deal with it.
> Lame trolls have educated you well, Grasshopper.
>
Lame trolls haven't educated me at all, maybe that's why I actually
*win* flamewars.
> >*your* choice to be pissy with me when I was more than content to just
> >have a rational discussion with you.
> >
> All you've been doing is screaming "you made a -threat-" and "Dana, spooge
> and *everyone* else can kick your ass".
>
I haven't been screaming anything. You wanted to know why I was
involved, so I told you. If you can't handle that, fuck you. I'm not
here to babysit.
> [...]
> >> >It hurts you Jet, because it makes you look like a backstabber. It also
> >> >
> >> No, I stabbed them right up front.
> >
> >By shooting yourself in the foot over and over again? Interesting
> >technique. Way to show the kids what NOT to do in a flamewar.
> >
> Please make up your mind. Either I stabbed them in the back or shot myself
> in the foot.
Why should I decide on one when you did both?
> Pointing out that usenet connects to RL is not shooting
> myself in the foot, nor is saying that an endless stream of billing and
> cooing between two people is very boring (something others have pointed
> out as well).
>
Connects by what? ICQ? E-mail? Personal visits I could see, or if you
made a genuine friendship, but don't sit there and tell me that everyone
who reads my posts thinks of me as a real life person and actually knows
me, because that's just bullshit.
> >> I've thought Dana, in particular, was
> >> a moron, since the very first post of his I ever read. As a matter of
> >> fact, despite his claims of debating rings around veryone in nanap, most
> >> people outside of his small circle of trolls, think he's a gibbering
> >> idiot.
> >
> >Wow, a circle jerk in a nana* froup, who'da thunk it? Now I know where
> >you learned self-importance as a posting style.
> >
> Ah, now I get it. You're one of those.
>
No bootlickers in nana*, nope, nosireee. Everyone's in there because of
their pure, innocent concern for the net.
Give me a fucking break.
> >> I think the hyping of Greg and Miscreant's romance, immediately after the
> >> months of spooning and mooning with Rocky (someone I'm quite fond of) is
> >> about as tasteless as anything I've ever seen; not because it hurts Rocky
> >> but because it's so obliviously tactless.
> >
> >Guess what jet, I've talked to all, ALL of the ones involved on a
> >regular basis. Rocky's not hurting for new prospects,
> >
> That's what I said: "not because it hurts Rocky".
>
Not the same thing, learn to read.
> and it's not like
> >Miscreant/Greg are doing their thing to be pricks.
> >
> They are right now. <g> At first it was kind of *sweet*, and then the
> gag reflexes took over.
>
You know what I do when they do that? Nothing. I like them both and just
can't worry about it. It's their relationship, and they'll do it their
way. I don't expect someone so self-important to understand that.
> >Way to not get over a relationship you didn't have, you goofy ass
> >netl00n.
> >
> If they're going to make it the highest volume thread in two groups
2 groups?
Let's see. APFR -- Where they normally post, so I can't see how that
would give any credence to what you say, since it wouldn't be a
disruption of anything.
Aaaaaaand what other group?
Exactly.
> , it's
> going to get commented on, much like the Kate goes postal over the break
> up with OpI thread.
>
Did Rocky go postal on usenet? Did Miscreant? Then it really doesn't
apply, does it?
Since you're clue impaired here's the answer:
No.
You're welcome.
> >> HTH.
> >
> >Oh, it did. It helped me see what a fucking freak you are.
> >
> How's that?
It showed that you took Rocky and Mis's breakup harder than they did?
See, unlike you, I don't burn half of the people involved when something
happens to their relationship. That would make me look, gosh what's that
word, oh yeah, VAPID. Then to have you go and try and justify that
behavior makes you look like, Oh I don't know, A FREAK?
> Dana -is- known a a high volume, lame sock puppet and Greg
> and Misc -have- been posting volumes about their great love, and the
> predominant responses I've seen have been to tell them to get a room. I'm
> sure you can explain how commenting on that makes me a freak, starting
> here:
> ---------start lucid explanation--------
I said it before, one response up, and if you were as smart as you
claimed you were, you would have figured it out loooooong before now. No
amount of lucid explanation is going to make you grow a brain. Brains
just don't work that way.
>
> >> >makes you look unstable, because you go off on these little binges of
> >> >what you think is flaming, when in reality, it's just you pissing and
> >> >moaning about what other people write.
> >> >
> >> Flaming -is- just pissing and moaning about what other people write,
> >> but with a bit of style.
> >
> >Well, if that's what you think it is, that explains why you lose so
> >badly at it.
> >
> So what is -your- opposing definition of flaming?
>
Here's a hint: Pissing and moaning have nothing to do with it.
> [...]
> >> >Well, now you look like the dumbest thing this side of Kate.
> >> >Congratulations. Is that what you wanted? Probably not.
> >> >
> >> I'm not particularly concerned that you think so, if that's what you're
> >> asking.
> >
> >Not really. Just spelling it out for you, oh clue impaired one.
> >
> You haven't provided the slightest reference for your conclusion, yet. You
> can list the quotes that make me the dumbest thing since Kate here:
I can.
But you should've been able to figure out what they were by now, so no
free clues for you.
> --------begin list-----------
>
You fill in the list, then you might have some slight insight into what
you're doing wrong. Like I said, i'm not here to babysit.
> I'm sorry I have to do this but you never seem to back up what you say.
You are sorry, yes.
As for backing up what I've had to say, I have. I haven't even had to go
to google to do it either. Common sense is a beautiful thing. Google
doesn't quantify concepts, which you have no clue about.
> When asked, you say you don't have time to explain, even though you have
> time to write an 800 line post. Now, let's see the logic you claim you've
> been using.
>
Not all of those 800 lines are mine, are they? Hey, tell ya what, I'll
even drop the sig, which will reduce even more lines.
Idiot.
> >> Since I don't to any elite flame/flonk in-group, I doubt anyone
> >> cares about my rep.
> >
> ><Joan Jett>
> >I don't give a damn 'bout my bad reputation
> >
> I've never been afraid of any deviation
> And I don't really care
> If ya think I'm strange
> I ain't gonna change
> And I'm never gonna care
> 'Bout my bad reputation
> ></Joan Jett>
> >
> Funny, I was just joking with someone about that being the theme they
> should use for my section of their webpage.
>
> [ikyabwai]
[Let's see what Jet snipped, just for grins, shall we?]
> Someone who thinks I'm dumb is about as credible as
> someone who thinks I'm vapid, anyway. <g>
>
Gotta love that unintentional irony. Nice backfire flame. If you shoot
yourself in the foot much more, I won't even have to reply.
[Yeah, go figger]
Good job ace.
> >> If you can show that I think I'm the sole arbiter of what's UPA, I'll
> >> happily take the short bus. I would think my regular disclaimers, stating
> >> that I'm -not- would have been a pretty good clue, even for you.
> >
> >******
> >
> >> >> >> Someone who's been around from the beginning of it and knows what it
> >> >> >> isn't.
> >
> >*******
> >
> >Ask not for whom the bus honks, it honks for you.
> >
> Where's the part about being the *sole arbiter*?
>
In your attitude regarding things UPA and who you think should be
posting.
> >> >> When I expressed my opinion and made no claims about
> >> >> anyone else's opinion.
> >> >
> >> >When you take your opinion, and try to make it sound like the official
> >> >opinion of the flonk.
>
> [ha]
> >> Official? You've lost your mind.
> >
> >No, you've lost your mind, for taking your opinion and saying that's the
> >way it should be.
> >
> Why shouldn't I have an opinion about the way it should be?
I didn't say you shouldn't have an opinion of how it should be. What you
don't realize is that yours isn't the only one, and using your opinion
without some rationality behind it is a piss poor way to prove your
point.
> I'm not
> cancelling or netcopping anyone who has other views.
>
Only because it would get you booted off your ISP, I'm sure.
> >> >> C'mon, boy, Flonkers aren't supposed to be so dim.
> >> >
> >> >No, they aren't, but then again, you aren't much of a flonker.
> >> >
> >> I've heard the battle cry of the War Geese and dreamed of them flying
> >> south in winter.
> >
> >Uh........you coming back to earth anytime soon?
> >
> A Flonker would have understood.
>
So because you throw out a non-sequiter, which by the way you said you
hate, that makes you a flonker?
Ooooooookay.
> >> Spooge
> >> >may be right, the only reason you're even there is so you can try to
> >> >pick a fight with DB6/Petitmorte posters.
> >> >
> >> Um, the only such posters I'm aware of are RussellB and spooge and I've
> >> been here longer that either DB6 or petitmorte have existed.
> >
> >So you're saying that DB6 and petitmorte have only 2 posters?
> >
> >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!
> >
> No, I just said "the only such posters I'm aware of [here] are RussellB
> and spooge.
Which here is here? This is crossposted to 5 groups. Since 2 of them are
considered UPA groups, and you, by your own admission are not a UPA
artist, that leaves ahm, which you're not exactly the bright star in the
sky, or the penguin froup, in which you're not exactly the bright star
in the sky.
Oh, and alt.flame.
Niiiiiiice shootin' Tex !!
> If there are more, they're either killfiled or I just don't
> read them. I have no idea how many posters DB6 has and people can't post
> from petitmorte.
> -------start list of other db6 posters here-----------
If you can't figure that out, why the hell should I tell you, since it
works to my advantage NOT to? Answer me that, then maybe you'll get
these inane lists you so desperately crave. Of course, if you could fill
in the blanks in the first place, you wouldn't be in the situation
you're in now.
>
> Obviously, I didn't come "here" to flame DB6ers, if I was "here" before
> they were.
Interesting claim, since google has
author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net archived only through early 2002.
and alt.fan.jet since 1999, in which before the year 2000, no posts
showed up under "jet" period. So obviously, you used another name, or
another reply addy, without either of which, nothing can be proven.
Conviennt, that.
> That makes spooge wrong (about what you said above). Clear now?
>
If you care to provide another name or reply addy, it would be made much
clearer than just muck from a bottom feeder.
> >> You don't really add anything
> >> >other than meager attempts to draw heat for your little flamewars, in
> >> >which everyone kicks your ass through your head.
> >> >
> >> You must live in a different dimension than I do. RussellB and Rocky
> >> blew me out of the water but, I can't, offhand, think of anyone else.
> >
> >Try EVERYONE else, that might jog your memory a little better.
> >
> Hmmmm. Nope. RussellB and Rocky are it.
>
Nice selective memory. I wish I could just do that.
> >> [...]
> >> >> -I've- never claimed to be a usenet performance artist.
> >> >
> >> >Then why are you in UPA groups?
> >> >
> >> It's where the cute doods are.
> >
> >That makes sense, because it sure as hell isn't because you do anything
> >UPA related.
> >
> That's a matter of opinion, isn't it?
>
UPA covers a lot of ground, or none at all, given someone's opinion. But
that's okay, since a person knows what UPA is/isn't when they see it. I
haven't seen it from you, however. My opinion, of course.
> >> > Why do you care what people post about
> >> >UPA or don't post UPA? You don't. You jut lay low, and go psycho at
> >> >bizarre times, thinking that makes you some sort of flame warrior. It
> >> >doesn't. It makes you look like a psycho going off at bizarre times.
> >> >
> >> and that is incompatible with UPA in what way?
> >
> >Infinity
> >Bonk
> [repeat 4 times]
>
> >
> Is that supposed to be UPA? Could someone with experience in UPA explain
> it to me?
>
If you don't know, how can you tell what is or what isn't UPA when you
see it? Which is it jet? Is it is, or is it ain't? After all, you've
been around since UPA started, and you can tell just like that *snap*
what is and what isn't UPA. Either way, why would you need an opinion
from someone with a UPA background?
I'm waiting....taptaptap
> [...]
> >> >Lately, no. I've just been hanging out, and I don't do cascades a whole
> >> >lot, but I have done it. Some of it worked, some of it bombed, but hey,
> >> >at least I've done it,
> >> >
> >> Who hasn't?
> >
> >You.
> >
> I've participated in cascades.
>
And cascades and flaming are what UPA are all about, right? Maybe you
need more opinion from UPA artists?
> >> >which is a hell of a lot more than I can say for
> >> >someone who sits on the sidelines whining about what others do.
> >> >
> >> -Now- I get it. Participating in cascades makes you a Usenet Performance
> >> Artist. Color me informed.
> >
> >Infinity
> >Bonk
> [repeat 4 more times]
> >
> Still need clarification. You're such a good UPArtist that I'm completely
> perplexed.
>
To be honest, I don't whether I'm a UPA artist at all. The reason's
simple. I never asked. I just say I roll with meow, until I broke away
with Greg and others, started posting in APFR and realized we were still
rolling with meow anyway. I guess if people want to call me that, I
don't have a problem with it, but I don't ask, and I haven't heard
anything either way.
I came to the flonk 'cause it looked like it would be fun. I was right.
It is. I like silly on usenet, or really, in general. I didn't worry
about what it meant. I was just there to have fun. I still am, so I
don't worry about whether I'm UPA or meow or not. I'd still be there
even if I never got a mhm or smeeter number, even if nobody considered
me a meower at all. I don't consider myself an artist, but I do
contribute to the group. I haven't seen much, but smug condescension and
badly written flames from you, which lowers the quality of the group, in
my opinion.
The infinity bonk reference:
I was doing acid one time with my friends. Everytime a thought
overloaded my friend's brain, he'd go "Infinity, Bonk", so I
appropriated it for you. Everytime I overloaded your brain and you
thought you could just bluster through, I just typed "Infinity Bonk"
rather belabour the point. So, despite your bleatings for help, nobody
from the UPA groups is gonna know what it means, well they will now, but
only because I told them through a usenet post.
> >> [...]
> >> >> I'm very good at playing.
> >> >
> >> >You haven't proven that by a long shot. You're welcome to keep trying
> >> >though, I'm sure it'll amuse someone, sometime.
> >> >
> >> It's a very sad person who thinks one has to be graded on play.
> >
> >Do you always have this stunning lack of logic? Can you even follow the
> >sentences on your screen?
> >
> Sentence synopsis:
> 1. I'm good at playing
> 2. You haven't proven it, but keep trying
> 3. It's a sad person who thinks play is graded (ref: proof must be
> provided)
>
> Please point out the lack of logic here:
The fact that you think you're good at flaming.
I told you to prove it, which you could have by actually coming up with
a good flame, and you just haven't.
You really don't want a grade from me.
> >> YM Dana, known as the lamest, noisiest babbling sock on usenet and Mis "I
> >> hate flaming" creant?
> >
> >Funny how nobody's backing you up on that. Go figure.
> >
> Other than dvus, tm, Meat-->Plow and a couple of Flonkers, ym (re: Dana)?
In this thread? No.
In the flonk that I can see? No.
> Mis is the one who said she hates flaming.
>
Yeah, and I find it hilarious that you tried to bait her at all,
considering your long standing on usenet. Like I've already said, for
someone who's been around as long as you claim, you sure as hell don't
grasp a lot.
> [stuff]
> >> It's
> >> not proper flamer etiquette, I know, but I believe in jumping over the
> >> net and shaking the winner's hand.
> >
> >Somehow, the trite concession speech missed my newsreader when Spooge
> >and Dowap, and Meat->Plow, and Dana kicked your ass through your head,
> >
> I doubt many people think spooge kicked anything, but I'm sure he has his
> own audience supporting him.
I see more supporting him on a regular basis than you. What does that
tell you?
> Dowap has never won a flame war with anyone.
BWAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAAA !!!!
Yeeeeeah, I've seen him destroy you on his own for myself. God, you must
not think that people read usenet too often or that they can remember
what they read.
> Meat-->Plow and I haven't had a flame war, as such, and he apologised for
> the 2 completely out of line things he said a year ago. Dana calling me a
> crack whore and claiming he wins because he made me *not* reply, is not
> kicking my head, I assure you. In fact his stream of posts about me, after
> I stopped replying to him, shows he's lost it.
Well, he got you to respond again real quick, didn't he, owned one?
> He's beginning to sound
> like Kate.
>
BWAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAAAA !!!!
Like you're one to talk, considering you're the closest thing to a
replacement Kate there is right now.
> [I -did- spank you. Didtoodidtoodidtoo.]
[Sad, sad, jet. Getting torched by me is NOT winning, hth]
> >> >you're gonna do what you always do, flame out, then lay low, then crawl
> >> >out of the woodwork when it doesn't sting so bad, or when Hannigan
> >> >decides to show his fat fucking face again, whichever.
> >> >
> >> Eh? This one I'm going to insist you post proof of. You don't even have
> >> to prove "always". Once or twice will do.
> >
> >Why would I need google, when I have the power of observation? You want
> >to go google shit so bad, go ahead. You'll prove me right sooner or
> >later anyway. Probably sooner.
> >
> Spank.
>
Hardly. I've seen it for myself, and I don't need to jump when you say
jump. You want to see your own crap so bad, you go and look it up. I've
observed YOU, and I know what you're gonna do, and it's gonna play out
pretty much how I've said. Yeah, I can go to google and drag up posts,
but in reality, I like the fact that I've called it, and you're going to
prove me exactly right.
> [...]
> >...slut.
Niiiiice selective snipping. Let's show the kids at home the part
snipped, shall we?
********
> No, a pseudo-bot is someone whose posts are frequently mistaken for bot
> spew. Volume doesn't win a flame war, boy.
>
Neither does acting like a total dipshit, slut.
**********
Not quite the paragon of virtue you made yourself out to be. Are you?
> >
> Deja vu?
>
> >> [you did -too- say you -were- going to burn down ap-fr]
> >
> >I did? Really? When?
> >
> That's the part of your response that I snipped. It's a traditional
> usenet use of bracketed comments.
When you're not busy post editing with them.
>
> Whoosh again.
>
> >> >> Yeah, I know. You're the one who said I've been carrying on a war with
> >> >> DB6 and petitmorte for years. That was all the info I needed to know
> >> >> you're clueless.
> >> >
> >> >Go to google(the posts search) and type in Jet Spooge Dowap Meat->Plow.
> >> >I don't even need to do it and I can see hundreds of posts. Naw, you
> >> >
> >> How many did I make?
> >
> >Enough.
> >
> Spank.
>
1800 posts under your name (author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net)
alone. That's enough in my book. 270 are due to typing in
spo...@petitmorte.net after your reply addy.
Oh, there's a spank, but not on me.
Who wants to bet that Jet drops the thread right here?
> >> >don't have a flamewar going with them, really. Any silence is just a
> >> >lull until it starts up again.
> >> >
> >> Find one before about March of last year.
> >>
> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte prior
> to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for "years".
>
> >> [Dana, Misc and Greg making a fool of me. *Snarf*]
> >
> >Earth to Jet.....Come in Jet......Earth to Jet......Helloooooooooo......
> >
> It's [snipped] material.
>
And it's still a ridiculous statement.
> >> >> Explain. I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
> >> >> and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill. G'head,
> >> >> I'll wait...
> >> >
> >> >Unlike you, I don't need to snivel.
> >> >
> >> Evasion. Try again.
> >
> >Psst.......try looking below this line.
> >
> >> >As for the crossposting, I said you could do it. I merely asked why
> >> >would you? It served no purpose other to drag people in it who have
> >
> >Now that wasn't so hard, was it?
> >
> Try again: I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
> and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill.
>
Oh, how do you "old timers" say it? *whoosh*?
> [...]
> >> BTW, it didn't drag a single person from any support group into it.
> >> They know how to ignore.
> >
> >Oh, is that what happened? You only chilled out because they didn't want
> >to be a part of it? That should tell you something.
> >
> Where does it say that's why I "chilled"?
No walking brain-death, I'm saying that's why you "chilled".
> I said that my posts didn't
> drag anyone from the support groups into the war.
>
Probably because they couldn't be bothered, which I've stated before.
> >> >better things to do, like recover, just so you could lose badly to
> >> >spooge anyway.
> >> >
> >> According to whom?
> >
> >Anyone who can see the threads?
> >
> ----------list--------------
A-N-Y-B-O-D-Y W-H-O C-A-N S-E-E T-H-E T-H-R-E-A-D-S.
It really shouldn't be that hard to comprehend.
>
> [yet another in a long line of ikyabwai]
> >> >just don't rate that kind of attention. Now, dry those tears, buck up,
> >> >and throw yet another text base temper tantrum because someone else with
> >> >a stronger grasp of logic than you, has punked you out.
> >> >
> >> *looks around*
> >>
> >> Surely you aren't referring to yourself?
> >
> >Is there another poster named trippy destroying you in this thread?
> >
> There isn't even one.
More of that mental white out, or are you just sniffing white out?
>
> >> >> >Whatever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Don't sulk. You're making a lot of stupid mistakes, but I'm still being
> >> >> fairly polite.
> >> >
> >> >Shit, I don't need to sulk.
> >> >
> >> Awww. Coochie coo.
> >
> >Can you at least try and pretend that you can follow a thread?
> >
> *whoosh in a PKBish manner*
Well, you couldn't follow the thread, posting yet another one of those
non-sequiter thangs that you hate so much. Of course I'm gonna ask if
you can follow the thread.
>
> >> The statement 'everyone has been hysterical at some time' is about as
> >> accurate as 'everyone has had a heart attack'. Hysteria is a specific
> >> emotional and physiological condition and isn't nearly as common as
> >> you think.
> >
> >Riiiiiiight, spin out that denial, no fear girl.
> >
> Fear isn't hysteria.
>
Whatever you say, shooter.
> [yak]
> >> >> When you have to tell anyone that you're being sarcastic, you aren't
> >> >> doing it right.
> >> >
> >> >Well, it did save me the effort of reading through your bluster about
> >> >how I'm not supposed to dictate who posts what, even though you asked me
> >> >to, so it was worth it.
> >> >
> >> *whoosh*
> >
> >Yeah, I'm not surprised that you don't get it.
> >
> I don't speak gobbledygook.
Well, actually, you pretty much do. I know you try to be witty and
entertaining and try to sound like you have a clue, but you...you just
don't do it real well.
> I'd explain how the part about you having to
> approve my posts is sarcasm but, as I've said, that means it's being done
> wrong. I'll just say *whoosh* again.
>
Run out of things to say? I'm not surprised.
> >> [...]
> >> >> >Gain a kl00, and you won't see my sarcasm again, well, until the next
> >> >> >time you run your keyboard off without knowing what the hell you're
> >> >> >talking about.
> >> >> >
> >> >> So tell me, wise one, what is it that I don't know about, in this thread?
> >> >
> >> >That would take longer than I have time for.
> >> >
> >> Uh huh. Backed yourself into a corner, again.
> >
> >No, it really would take longer than I have time for. You're pretty
> >clueless.
> >
> I'm not asking for the complete set, just the ones that explain the things
> I've said that show I don't know what I'm talking about in this thread.
I've already proven that over and over in this thread. Feel free to read
the thread again, or have someone read the thread and try to drill the
pretty words into your thick skull.
> TIA.
>
No problem, I'm all about being a helping hand.
> [...]
> >> >> >Then I'm sure you'll find a place for yourself somewhere.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Keep them cliche replies coming, sweetheart. They're all your usenet
> >> >> dreams are made of.
> >> >
> >> ><Translation>
> >> >
> >> >"That was good, and I don't have a pithy comeback for it."
> >> >
> >> ></Translation>
> >> >
> >> Well, no. I was just tired of saying IKYABWAI.
> >
> >But yet you have no qualms about posting long versions of them.
> >
> None at all.
Obviously.
> It's a nice break from having to repeat it to you, over and
> over.
>
Yes, I already know you're capable of posting IKYBWAI's, so stop
already.
> >> >Sure thing, slut.
> >> >
> >> Ooooooh. A tough guy.
> >
> >Try not to cream because someone called you slut, k?
> >
> It's been done before and by a more competent flamer than you'll ever be.
I haven't lost yet, and I'm sure as hell not gonna lose to you. You've
already proven me right about that.
> You must have missed how ineffective it was.
>
So ineffective, that you felt the need to respond to it, and post snip
an earlier part of the post so that it just says the word slut.
> [...]
> >> >> I was quite obviously referring to Dana and misc (see above) but, yes,
> >> >> I've killfiled most petitmorte and DB6 posters (the few that are left).
> >> >> I read RussellB's and Meat-->Plow's posts. I've replied to spooge once
> >> >> in several weeks. Who else do you have in mind?
> >> >
> >> >I'm sure given enough time, I could blow that claim all to hell. I'd
> >> >make it a project, but you aren't really worth that much attention.
> >> >
> >> A few examples from the last few months would be adequate. Spooge ducked
> >> out when I asked him, too.
> >
> >Why go to google when I can see it for myself. I'm surprised you managed
> >to restrain yourself when spooge showed up in this thread, but we'll
> >see. Time tells all. Tickticktickticktick.
> >
> Bring the examples or retract.
Well, examples will come in time, when I blow them all to hell. So which
part is incorrect? The part where you had a years long flamewar with
spooge, or the fact that any silence between you and DB6/petitmorte
posters is just a lull unil you go off half-cocked again? Oh, nice
convient snip there too. You're just a snippin' fiend, aintcha? Next
time you can either take the section out or leave it in entirely. Notice
that I haven't felt the need to post edit you, so now given that, you
tell me who's winning.
Like I said time will tell all.
>
> [You -did- say you friends were going to attack. *sob*]
You did, with the accompanying backpedal from you. I know it hurts, but
you really need to get over it.
>
> [I don't know what a diatribe is.]
Obviously I know what a diatribe is, howver you posted definitions out
of the blue and I read them wrong. Wow jet, you got a point! Yay for you
!!
let's look at the score now, shall we?
Jet:1
trippy; 232
Psst....you're still losing. Badly.
>
> [I don't know what a rhetorical question is.]
> >> A rhetorical question is not a threat you mindless cretin.
> >
> >Rhetorical question my ass.
> >
> >> If that's the
> >> reason you started masturbaiting over this thread, you've wasted time and
> >> a perfectly good wank.
> >
> >I just said bring your buddies and come "educate" me.
> >
> Why would I do that?
Because you said you were going to?
> That's what *Dana* is going to do (and go round and
> round and round in the circle game).
>
Ooooooooh, so now he's telling you his plans, is he? I seeee.
> [defensive posturing about masturbation.]
BWAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAAA !!!!!!
Let's look at the portion snipped, since jet's as good at summarizing as
she is with flaming.
***********
> If that's the
> reason you started masturbaiting over this thread, you've wasted time and
> a perfectly good wank.
>
I just said bring your buddies and come "educate" me. There wasn't
masturbation involved. I prefer live women instead of text based
messages to fulfill my sexual needs.
*********************
> >> You've been added to my list of people who aren't worth the piss it
> >> would take to drown them and I've added a big 'R' behind your name.
> >
> >Riiiiiiiight. See you in the next reply.
> >
> and here it is. You're still on the worthless list and flagged as
> retarded.
>
You made my point for me. Again.
Just give it up Jet, you aren't good at this.
--
Trippy
tri...@XspamblockXthetrippy.com
You're different, and that's bad.
Doobie Doobie Doo
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
[...]
> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte
> prior to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for "years".
Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of 2000.
That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
little over a year ago."
It's taken about a month, but I see that you're finally confessing that you
lied in the post I've referenced.
Good show.
Oh, yeah....
To quote you: "Spank!"
--
You're so very ordinary
You're so very lame
Tastes like whiskey on your lips
And earthworms rule your brain
BigNetBuy
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!
204.71.34.3!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.alt.net!usenet
>From: "spo...@petitmorte.net" spo...@petitmorte.net
>Newsgroups: alt.hackers.malicious, alt.penguin-fetish.recovery, alt.flame,
>alt.romath, alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
>Date: 11 Apr 2002 04:44:25 GMT
>Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - http://www.altopia.com
>Lines: 29
>Message-ID: <Xns91ECDD27C13...@207.14.113.17>
>References: <91E7E3F4Ezant...@209.249.90.101>
><fI2s8.12445$VM5.3...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com>
><a8qfs5$piu$1...@dosa.alt.net> <91E9A27ABzant...@209.249.90.101>
><a8qk1v$piu$4...@dosa.alt.net> <MPG.171aaffaa...@news.alt.net>
><a8quau$sm8$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net> <MPG.171ac4618...@news.alt.net>
><a8r3os$fcp$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net> <MPG.171ae1caf...@news.alt.net>
><a8rdpk$f6a$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net> <MPG.171bf0bf9...@news.alt.net>
><a8tg7v$imq$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net> <MPG.171c124e8...@news.alt.net>
><a8tt28$aoh$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net> <MPG.171d36fa1...@news.alt.net>
><a90bfi$s5v$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net> <MPG.171e70c85...@news.alt.net>
><a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
>X-Content-Type: It's A Post, Stoopid
>X-Complaints-To: Ab...@PetitMorte.net
>X-A-Beer-Would-Be-Nice: Yes
>X-Cohort-0.08: Yes
>X-Have-You-Had-Your-PetitMorte-Today: ?
>X-mhm: 29x3
>X-anty-spamn-sleze-soldeir: bagde #10jdt64785hs5
>X-Whats-So-Funny: Bout Peace Love And Understanding?
>X-Trollum: Yeah Baybee
>X-Kife: Dat too!
>X-Living-Pr0n: 24/7/365
>X-Face:
>9xqA_cS:<vd|zLcPCs#go%2tl3Z."4{#FeoMGk4V*9nc)5_XC!5tn#"S;j{~~.0>R95O^6P+l
hY2y*,&wgf>\gjTN4buvPey+w'B'+SJ!%+5OR\8PNh&ut_!owD\
>X-je-me-souviens: September 11, 2001
>Xref: lobby alt.hackers.malicious:532896 alt.penguin-fetish.recovery:46208
>alt.flame:871213 alt.romath:257161 alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:584298
>
>
>
>morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>news:a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
>
>[...]
>> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte
>> prior to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for "years".
>
>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>
>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of 2000.
>That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
>little over a year ago."
*************
Say, didn't you once claim there was no connection between db6 and pedomorte?
- Big
"{BNB} is a little Net-Trollop. He sluts his wrath all over the place." - John
Boyd
"BNB is a lying buffoon. making up fairy tales about clown applications..." -
KiwiRock
jet
>morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>news:a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
>
>[...]
>> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte
>
>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>
>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of 2000.
Which is a pretty clear indication I -wasn't- at war with databasix then
or I wouldn't get an account there, idiot. I had the account until April
12, 2001, after the flame war started in early March of 2001.
>That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
>little over a year ago."
>
>It's taken about a month, but I see that you're finally confessing that you
>lied in the post I've referenced.
>
>Good show.
>
>Oh, yeah....
>
>To quote you: "Spank!"
>
-You- aren't databasix and I disliked you long before I got my databasix
account in November 2000. Get over it, dumbshit. All you are is a long
term usenet dullard who, once again, has made a fool of himself. Even your
co-users at databasix thought you were boring as shit.
candle
news:a938c1$8ud$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
we are at war with databasix, we have always been at war with
databasix, I am an agent of hannigan, I infiltrated the databasix
party to spy and gain propaganda for hannigan.
jesus jet, would you stop humping the corpse of orwell for your style,
you boring cunt?
candle
"and people say I lack originality?"
jet
>This dude, "jet" morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net, in message
><a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>, said the following tripped out
>things....
>> In article <MPG.171e70c85...@news.alt.net>, trippy
>> <tri...@spam.sucks> wrote:
>> >This dude, "jet" morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net, in message
>> ><a90bfi$s5v$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>, said the following tripped out
>> >things....
>> <trippy,jet,trippy,jet. Repeat as needed>
>> >> [outrageous line count]
>> >{cope with it}
>> No thanks, I'll continue going
>> [snip]
>> That's what those things (below) in brackets are; a summary of the things
>> being snipped, not a response to you.
>
>No shit? Really? Gosh Jet, thanks. Where would I be without your divine
>guidance?
>
indicators.
>Pssst....that was more sarcasm.
>
It was more of an autoflame, since you don't seem to know what you
did.
[trippy doesn't know English]
[trippy shows he still doesn't know the differene between a question
and a statement of intent.]
>> Lame trolls have educated you well, Grasshopper.
>
>Lame trolls haven't educated me at all, maybe that's why I actually
>*win* flamewars.
>
I've never seen you do so. PPOR.
[trippy gets involved because he can't tell a question from a statement
of intent.]
>> Pointing out that usenet connects to RL is not shooting
>> myself in the foot, nor is saying that an endless stream of billing and
>> cooing between two people is very boring (something others have pointed
>> out as well).
>
>Connects by what? ICQ? E-mail? Personal visits I could see, or if you
>made a genuine friendship, but don't sit there and tell me that everyone
>who reads my posts thinks of me as a real life person and actually knows
>me, because that's just bullshit.
>
I realize most of your friends write like bots but there -are- RL people
sitting behind the keyboards writing the words. Didn't you know that?
>No bootlickers in nana*, nope, nosireee. Everyone's in there because of
>their pure, innocent concern for the net.
>
What does that have to do with most nanap regs thinking Dana is a moron?
>> >> I think the hyping of Greg and Miscreant's romance, immediately after the
>> >> months of spooning and mooning with Rocky (someone I'm quite fond of) is
>> >> about as tasteless as anything I've ever seen; not because it hurts Rocky
>> >> but because it's so obliviously tactless.
>> >
>> >Guess what jet, I've talked to all, ALL of the ones involved on a
>> >regular basis. Rocky's not hurting for new prospects,
>> >
>> That's what I said: "not because it hurts Rocky".
>
>Not the same thing, learn to read.
>
I -wrote- it you stupid toad.
[trippy doesn't care about the flood of Greg <hearts> Miscreant posts,
so nobody else should]
>> If they're going to make it the highest volume thread in two groups
>
>2 groups?
>
>Let's see. APFR -- Where they normally post, so I can't see how that
>would give any credence to what you say, since it wouldn't be a
>disruption of anything.
>
What I said was they made it the highest volume thread. How does it
not being disruptive have anything to do with whether anyone comments
on it?
>Aaaaaaand what other group?
>
>Exactly.
>
The Flonk.
>> , it's
>> going to get commented on, much like the Kate goes postal over the break
>> up with OpI thread.
>
>Did Rocky go postal on usenet? Did Miscreant? Then it really doesn't
>apply, does it?
>
Misc (I hate flaming) decided to start flaming Rocky for his posts so,
yes, it does apply but, that isn't what I said or implied. The Greg/Misc
thread was a high volume, personal thread between 2 people, as was the
Kate/OpI one. The more high volume a thread is, the more likely it is to
be eventually commented on, whether it's disruptive or not.
>Since you're clue impaired here's the answer:
>
>No.
>
Wrong again.
>> >Oh, it did. It helped me see what a fucking freak you are.
>> >
>> How's that?
>
>It showed that you took Rocky and Mis's breakup harder than they did?
>
Um, I was delighted that they broke up, dimwit. Rocky can do and has done
much better than Mis.
>See, unlike you, I don't burn half of the people involved when something
>happens to their relationship. That would make me look, gosh what's that
>word, oh yeah, VAPID.
>
How would burning the people involved be vapid? You still don't know
what it means, or you wouldn't use it so totally out of context.
> Then to have you go and try and justify that
>behavior makes you look like, Oh I don't know, A FREAK?
>
I do realize it was unusual for me to agree with Afffinity but I don't
think it makes me a freak.
>> Dana -is- known a a high volume, lame sock puppet and Greg
>> and Misc -have- been posting volumes about their great love, and the
>> predominant responses I've seen have been to tell them to get a room. I'm
>> sure you can explain how commenting on that makes me a freak, starting
>> here:
>> ---------start lucid explanation--------
>
>I said it before, one response up, and if you were as smart as you
>claimed you were, you would have figured it out loooooong before now. No
>amount of lucid explanation is going to make you grow a brain. Brains
>just don't work that way.
>
Spank. Unable to explain how making factual remarks about 3 usenet posters
makes me a freak.
>> >> >makes you look unstable, because you go off on these little binges of
>> >> >what you think is flaming, when in reality, it's just you pissing and
>> >> >moaning about what other people write.
>> >> >
>> >> Flaming -is- just pissing and moaning about what other people write,
>> >> but with a bit of style.
>> >
>> >Well, if that's what you think it is, that explains why you lose so
>> >badly at it.
>> >
>> So what is -your- opposing definition of flaming?
>
>Here's a hint: Pissing and moaning have nothing to do with it.
>
That isn't a definition. Pissing and moaning, with style, about what other
people write is what flamers do. You do know that pissing and moaning is
a -very- common euphemism for complaining, don't you? I'm beginning to
wonder if we speak the same language.
Now, what is your dissenting definition of flaming?
[...]
>> You haven't provided the slightest reference for your conclusion, yet. You
>> can list the quotes that make me the dumbest thing since Kate here:
>
>I can.
>
>But you should've been able to figure out what they were by now, so no
>free clues for you.
>
>> --------begin list-----------
>>
>
>You fill in the list, then you might have some slight insight into what
>you're doing wrong. Like I said, i'm not here to babysit.
>
Spank. Unable to give a single example to support statement that I'm
the dumbest thing since Kte.
>> I'm sorry I have to do this but you never seem to back up what you say.
>
>You are sorry, yes.
>
Ikyabwai. Again.
>As for backing up what I've had to say, I have. I haven't even had to go
>to google to do it either. Common sense is a beautiful thing. Google
>doesn't quantify concepts, which you have no clue about.
>
Google provides facts, which you keep evading, spankard.
>> When asked, you say you don't have time to explain, even though you have
>> time to write an 800 line post. Now, let's see the logic you claim you've
>> been using.
>
>Not all of those 800 lines are mine, are they? Hey, tell ya what, I'll
>even drop the sig, which will reduce even more lines.
>
>Idiot.
>
Spank. All these reply cycles and you still don't have time to explain
your own ridiculous conclusions or allegations, and dodge when asked to.
[...]
>[Let's see what Jet snipped, just for grins, shall we?]
>
>> Someone who thinks I'm dumb is about as credible as
>> someone who thinks I'm vapid, anyway. <g>
>
>Gotta love that unintentional irony. Nice backfire flame. If you shoot
>yourself in the foot much more, I won't even have to reply.
>
I'm neither lifeless, insipid nor dumb. There was no irony.
>[Yeah, go figger]
>
>Good job ace.
>
Why continue to discuss it when you don't know what it means? I don't
think you know what irony means, either, or you wouldn't have said such
an asinine thing.
>> >> If you can show that I think I'm the sole arbiter of what's UPA, I'll
>> >> happily take the short bus. I would think my regular disclaimers, stating
>> >> that I'm -not- would have been a pretty good clue, even for you.
>> >
>> >******
>> >
>> >> >> >> Someone who's been around from the beginning of it and knows what it
>> >> >> >> isn't.
>> >
>> >*******
>> >
>> >Ask not for whom the bus honks, it honks for you.
>> >
>> Where's the part about being the *sole arbiter*?
>
>In your attitude regarding things UPA and who you think should be
>posting.
>
Repeat and expand: Where's the part of what I've ever written that shows
I think I'm the sole arbiter of UPA? I'd like to know how you can read my
mind and find things that contradict my explicit, written disclaimers.
You're defensiveness about your own lack of ability doesn't mean I have an
attitude about it.
>> >> >> When I expressed my opinion and made no claims about
>> >> >> anyone else's opinion.
>> >> >
>> >> >When you take your opinion, and try to make it sound like the official
>> >> >opinion of the flonk.
>>
>> [ha]
>> >> Official? You've lost your mind.
>> >
>> >No, you've lost your mind, for taking your opinion and saying that's the
>> >way it should be.
>> >
>> Why shouldn't I have an opinion about the way it should be?
>
>I didn't say you shouldn't have an opinion of how it should be. What you
>don't realize is that yours isn't the only one, and using your opinion
>without some rationality behind it is a piss poor way to prove your
>point.
>
I realize my opinion isn't the only one. As far as rationality, I'm
certainly not the only one who's expressed displeasure with the current
state of UPA. Are you saying anyone who agrees with me is irrational, too?
>> I'm not
>> cancelling or netcopping anyone who has other views.
>
>Only because it would get you booted off your ISP, I'm sure.
>
Uh huh. You've just made a clear accusation that, if it weren't for the
possibility of losing my account, I would be cancelling posts from people
I disagree with. I expect you to post some rationale for that allegation
or retract it immediately. Don't backpedal, just apologise, boy. Now.
>> >> I've heard the battle cry of the War Geese and dreamed of them flying
>> >> south in winter.
>> >
>> >Uh........you coming back to earth anytime soon?
>> >
>> A Flonker would have understood.
>
>So because you throw out a non-sequiter, which by the way you said you
>hate, that makes you a flonker?
>
>Ooooooookay.
>
It wasn't, in any way, a non-sequitur. It was an easily found A2VF3
reference. Go to Google. Lookup the phrase War Geese in the Flonk.
Then look for a post from Flaagg talking about being out one winter
morning and seeing geese flying south.
>> No, I just said "the only such posters I'm aware of [here] are RussellB
>> and spooge.
>
>Which here is here? This is crossposted to 5 groups. Since 2 of them are
>considered UPA groups, and you, by your own admission are not a UPA
>artist, that leaves ahm, which you're not exactly the bright star in the
>sky, or the penguin froup, in which you're not exactly the bright star
>in the sky.
>
>Oh, and alt.flame.
>
>Niiiiiiice shootin' Tex !!
>
Spank. What does that have to do with me not being aware of any posters
from Databasix, in -any- of those groups, other than spooge or RussellB.
Respond to what's written, please.
>> If there are more, they're either killfiled or I just don't
>> read them. I have no idea how many posters DB6 has and people can't post
>> from petitmorte.
>> -------start list of other db6 posters here-----------
>
>If you can't figure that out, why the hell should I tell you, since it
>works to my advantage NOT to? Answer me that, then maybe you'll get
>these inane lists you so desperately crave. Of course, if you could fill
>in the blanks in the first place, you wouldn't be in the situation
>you're in now.
>
Spank. Unable to provide names of other DB6 posters.
>> Obviously, I didn't come "here" to flame DB6ers, if I was "here" before
>> they were.
>
>Interesting claim, since google has
>author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net archived only through early 2002.
>and alt.fan.jet since 1999, in which before the year 2000, no posts
>showed up under "jet" period. So obviously, you used another name, or
>another reply addy, without either of which, nothing can be proven.
>Conviennt, that.
>
I didn't archive. Look up replies where the attributions include
Jun...@ptw.com, jet at untool.net or morrigan at ogoense.net. If
you need earlier ones, I'll try to remember my qnet.net, unr.net and
sprynet.com addresses. There were also posts made under my legal first
name.
>> That makes spooge wrong (about what you said above). Clear now?
>
>If you care to provide another name or reply addy, it would be made much
>clearer than just muck from a bottom feeder.
>
About coming here to pick fights with databasix users? I had an account
at databasix and was on good terms with users other than spooge from Nov,
2000 to April 2001. How could I be at war with them prior to that? I can
provide references who will say I was posting to UPA and Meower groups
before I got the databasix account. Want the names?
[trippy says others beat me at flame wars, besides RussellB and Rocky,
because they say so. <snicker>]
People I've been in flame wars with, other than RB and Rocky:
1. Romath-win
2. Zazlee-win
3. David Sterling-win
4. Gary Burnore-win
5. Belinda Burnore-win
6. spooge-win (though contested)
7. MnD and others in alt.swingers-win
8. Some kooks in the Jerry Ryan group (accompanied by SharonB)-win
9. Affinity-tie
10. little toad-win
Who else?
>> >That makes sense, because it sure as hell isn't because you do anything
>> >UPA related.
>> >
>> That's a matter of opinion, isn't it?
>>
>
>UPA covers a lot of ground, or none at all, given someone's opinion. But
>that's okay, since a person knows what UPA is/isn't when they see it. I
>haven't seen it from you, however. My opinion, of course.
>
<sigh> That's what I said.
>> >> and that is incompatible with UPA in what way?
>> >
>> >Infinity
>> >Bonk
>> [repeat 4 times]
>> >
>> Is that supposed to be UPA? Could someone with experience in UPA explain
>> it to me?
>
>If you don't know, how can you tell what is or what isn't UPA when you
>see it? Which is it jet? Is it is, or is it ain't? After all, you've
>been around since UPA started, and you can tell just like that *snap*
>what is and what isn't UPA. Either way, why would you need an opinion
>from someone with a UPA background?
>
That doesn't answer the question. I'll state that it could be some form
of the New UPA (that stuff I've been arguing about), if it will make you
happy. It may have some earth-shaking meaning to you.
>I'm waiting....taptaptap
>
I have no idea what it was, other than bandwidth wasting lines. Neither
do you, apparently, despite your ability to recognize whether I've ever
posted any UPA.
It's called a stand-off but, I asked first. Answer the question.
>> >> >Lately, no. I've just been hanging out, and I don't do cascades a whole
>> >> >lot, but I have done it. Some of it worked, some of it bombed, but hey,
>> >> >at least I've done it,
>> >> >
>> >> Who hasn't?
>> >
>> >You.
>> >
>> I've participated in cascades.
>
>And cascades and flaming are what UPA are all about, right? Maybe you
>need more opinion from UPA artists?
>
Um, you said you don't do cascades a lot, but you have done it. I said
"who hasn't"? You said "you". I've participated in cascades. You're
reading things into a very simple exchange that aren't there. If you
keep putting words in my mouth, I'm going to consider this thread a
total win for me, since you can't even deal with the reality of what's
said.
[trippy explains a lot of shit I never asked about and makes the Kate-ish
allegation that I've asked others for help in this thread (apparently
think a mocking request for an experienced UPAer is asking for help)]
>> Sentence synopsis:
>> 1. I'm good at playing
>> 2. You haven't proven it, but keep trying
>> 3. It's a sad person who thinks play is graded (ref: proof must be
>> provided)
>>
>> Please point out the lack of logic here:
>
>The fact that you think you're good at flaming.
>
Playing != flaming, though some think I'm good at it. Another thing that's
based on opinion. Personally, I don't think things like repeating "I'm
living in j00r head rent free", "I made you answer, so u r owned",
"u r taking this to serious" and "HAHA I made j00 dance" are anything to
write home about, but they seem to be popular with your crowd.
>I told you to prove it, which you could have by actually coming up with
>a good flame, and you just haven't.
>You really don't want a grade from me.
>
Since 90% of what I've said has gone completely over your head, you
wouldn't have any idea whether I was flaming you or not. Given that you
think Dana can flame, you aren't qualified to grade me.
>
>> >> YM Dana, known as the lamest, noisiest babbling sock on usenet and Mis "I
>> >> hate flaming" creant?
>> >
>> >Funny how nobody's backing you up on that. Go figure.
>> >
>> Other than dvus, tm, Meat-->Plow and a couple of Flonkers, ym (re: Dana)?
>
>In this thread? No.
>In the flonk that I can see? No.
>
You [conveniently] miss a lot, don't you?
>> Mis is the one who said she hates flaming.
>
>Yeah, and I find it hilarious that you tried to bait her at all,
>considering your long standing on usenet. Like I've already said, for
>someone who's been around as long as you claim, you sure as hell don't
>grasp a lot.
>
I haven't tried to bait her, at all. I don't address her or reply to
her and she's been back in my killfile for weeks. She was only let out,
at all, because she was a friend of Rocky and Dean.
OTOH, for someone who hates flaming, she sure attempts to do a lot of
it.
>> I doubt many people think spooge kicked anything, but I'm sure he has his
>> own audience supporting him.
>
>I see more supporting him on a regular basis than you. What does that
>tell you?
>
That you're delusional.
>> Dowap has never won a flame war with anyone.
>
>BWAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAAA !!!!
>
>Yeeeeeah, I've seen him destroy you on his own for myself. God, you must
>not think that people read usenet too often or that they can remember
>what they read.
>
You -are- delusional.
>> Meat-->Plow and I haven't had a flame war, as such, and he apologised for
>> the 2 completely out of line things he said a year ago. Dana calling me a
>> crack whore and claiming he wins because he made me *not* reply, is not
>> kicking my head, I assure you. In fact his stream of posts about me, after
>> I stopped replying to him, shows he's lost it.
>
>Well, he got you to respond again real quick, didn't he, owned one?
>
Um, no. I haven't replied to him since I told him I wasn't going to
(nearly a week ago).
>> [I -did- spank you. Didtoodidtoodidtoo.]
>[Sad, sad, jet. Getting torched by me is NOT winning, hth]
>
You're responding to the snippage indicators again. I was summarizing
what -you- said, dolt.
>> >> >you're gonna do what you always do, flame out, then lay low, then crawl
>> >> >out of the woodwork when it doesn't sting so bad, or when Hannigan
>> >> >decides to show his fat fucking face again, whichever.
>> >> >
>> >> Eh? This one I'm going to insist you post proof of. You don't even have
>> >> to prove "always". Once or twice will do.
>> >
>> >Why would I need google, when I have the power of observation? You want
>> >to go google shit so bad, go ahead. You'll prove me right sooner or
>> >later anyway. Probably sooner.
>> >
>> Spank.
>>
>
>Hardly. I've seen it for myself, and I don't need to jump when you say
>jump. You want to see your own crap so bad, you go and look it up. I've
>observed YOU, and I know what you're gonna do, and it's gonna play out
>pretty much how I've said. Yeah, I can go to google and drag up posts,
>but in reality, I like the fact that I've called it, and you're going to
>prove me exactly right.
>
Still unable to provide a single example. Spank.
Pleasepleaseplease, provide *one* example of me laying low, after being
flamed. Just one. Pwetty pwease.
<snicker>
>> [...]
>> >...slut.
>
>Niiiiice selective snipping. Let's show the kids at home the part
>snipped, shall we?
>
>********
>
>> No, a pseudo-bot is someone whose posts are frequently mistaken for bot
>> spew. Volume doesn't win a flame war, boy.
>>
>
>Neither does acting like a total dipshit, slut.
>
>**********
>
>Not quite the paragon of virtue you made yourself out to be. Are you?
>
Since I never made out that I was a paragon of virtue (PPOR), I couldn't
be, could I.
I think, given your bizarre behavior in attributing imaginary statements
or implications to me, it's almost time for me to declare total spank.
>> >> [you did -too- say you -were- going to burn down ap-fr]
>> >
>> >I did? Really? When?
>> >
>> That's the part of your response that I snipped. It's a traditional
>> usenet use of bracketed comments.
>
>When you're not busy post editing with them.
>
You don't know what post editing, selective snipping or summarizing
are, either. Arguing with such extreme ignorance is getting wearing.
>> >> >> Yeah, I know. You're the one who said I've been carrying on a war with
>> >> >> DB6 and petitmorte for years. That was all the info I needed to know
>> >> >> you're clueless.
>> >> >
>> >> >Go to google(the posts search) and type in Jet Spooge Dowap Meat->Plow.
>> >> >I don't even need to do it and I can see hundreds of posts. Naw, you
>> >> >
>> >> How many did I make?
>> >
>> >Enough.
>> >
>> Spank.
>>
>
>1800 posts under your name (author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net)
>alone. That's enough in my book. 270 are due to typing in
>spo...@petitmorte.net after your reply addy.
>
356 of spo...@petitmorte.net's 9040 posts include my address. Does
that mean he's at war with ogoense.net?
How many of mine are prior to March 2001? You said "years" honey. Prove it
or STFU. Then show how many (even the ones to spooge) have anything to do
with databasix or petitmorte. You don't understand the principles of proof
any more than anything else, it seems.
>Oh, there's a spank, but not on me.
>
>Who wants to bet that Jet drops the thread right here?
>
No chance, since I just showed how clueless you are.
>> >> >don't have a flamewar going with them, really. Any silence is just a
>> >> >lull until it starts up again.
>> >> >
>> >> Find one before about March of last year.
>> >>
>> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte prior
>> to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for "years".
>>
You're still avoiding this. Why don't you answer it?
>> >> [Dana, Misc and Greg making a fool of me. *Snarf*]
>> >
>> >Earth to Jet.....Come in Jet......Earth to Jet......Helloooooooooo......
>> >
>> It's [snipped] material.
>
>And it's still a ridiculous statement.
>
Jesus, how many times do I have to explain it's a summary of what *you*
were saying, that I snipped, you dullard? I think it's ridiculous too,
but *you* were the one who said it.
>> >> >> Explain. I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
>> >> >> and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill. G'head,
>> >> >> I'll wait...
>> >> >
>> >> >Unlike you, I don't need to snivel.
>> >> >
>> >> Evasion. Try again.
>> >
>> >Psst.......try looking below this line.
>> >
>> >> >As for the crossposting, I said you could do it. I merely asked why
>> >> >would you? It served no purpose other to drag people in it who have
>> >
>> >Now that wasn't so hard, was it?
>> >
>> Try again: I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
>> and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill.
>>
>
>Oh, how do you "old timers" say it? *whoosh*?
>
IOW, you can't answer the question, so you evade with something unrelated.
Spank.
>> [...]
>> >> BTW, it didn't drag a single person from any support group into it.
>> >> They know how to ignore.
>> >
>> >Oh, is that what happened? You only chilled out because they didn't want
>> >to be a part of it? That should tell you something.
>> >
>> Where does it say that's why I "chilled"?
>
>No walking brain-death, I'm saying that's why you "chilled".
>
How do you know that, since none replied and I backed away from doing it
about an hour after I started? Remember saying that you tried to talk me
out of it but I had already stopped? Talk about brain dead. You're just
drifting all over the map, making things up and contradicting things you
said before. What a loser.
>> >> >better things to do, like recover, just so you could lose badly to
>> >> >spooge anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> According to whom?
>> >
>> >Anyone who can see the threads?
>> >
>> ----------list--------------
>
>A-N-Y-B-O-D-Y W-H-O C-A-N S-E-E T-H-E T-H-R-E-A-D-S.
>
>It really shouldn't be that hard to comprehend.
>
Since you're speaking for everyone, name someone unbiased and unprejudiced
who thinks I've lost badly to spooge.
>> [yet another in a long line of ikyabwai]
>> >> >just don't rate that kind of attention. Now, dry those tears, buck up,
>> >> >and throw yet another text base temper tantrum because someone else with
>> >> >a stronger grasp of logic than you, has punked you out.
>> >> >
>> >> *looks around*
>> >>
>> >> Surely you aren't referring to yourself?
>> >
>> >Is there another poster named trippy destroying you in this thread?
>> >
>> There isn't even one.
>
>More of that mental white out, or are you just sniffing white out?
>
>>
>> >> >> >Whatever.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Don't sulk. You're making a lot of stupid mistakes, but I'm still being
>> >> >> fairly polite.
>> >> >
>> >> >Shit, I don't need to sulk.
>> >> >
>> >> Awww. Coochie coo.
>> >
>> >Can you at least try and pretend that you can follow a thread?
>> >
>> *whoosh in a PKBish manner*
>
>Well, you couldn't follow the thread, posting yet another one of those
>non-sequiter thangs that you hate so much. Of course I'm gonna ask if
>you can follow the thread.
>
It wasn't a non-sequitur. It was a logical transition that went:
(me proving you were wrong about something)
trippy (sulking): whatever.
jet: don't sulk.
trippy (still sulking but defiant): I don't need to sulk.
jet: Aww. Coochie coo. (what one says to a sulky baby).
[trippy DKWWM and insists fear = hysteria]
That's incorrect.
> or the fact that any silence between you and DB6/petitmorte
>posters is just a lull unil you go off half-cocked again? Oh, nice
>
Do you consider Wotan, Kevin Cannon, spooge, Gary and Cujo coming out of
nowhere, to jump into conversations I was having with someone else
(unrelated to PM or DB6) and accuse me of things I didn't do, to be -me-
going off half-cocked? I need to know, before you claim victory.
>convient snip there too. You're just a snippin' fiend, aintcha? Next
>
Yup.
>time you can either take the section out or leave it in entirely.
>
or what?
Notice
>that I haven't felt the need to post edit you, so now given that, you
>tell me who's winning.
>
I haven't post edited. Learn what the terms you use mean. It shouldn't
be too hard since a half dozen of us have already pointed out the same
stupid mistake to Kate. Just read those posts, imbecile.
>Like I said time will tell all.
>
>>
>> [You -did- say you friends were going to attack. *sob*]
>
>You did, with the accompanying backpedal from you. I know it hurts, but
>you really need to get over it.
>
Even you aren't -that- stupid. You'd have to have the brain of a 5 year
old to think I said any such thing. You really are making a ludicrous
spectacle of yourself, with your insistance.
[after a stunning barrage of IKYAs, PKBs, and claims of victory, trippy
says...]
>> >I just said bring your buddies and come "educate" me.
>> >
>> Why would I do that?
>
>Because you said you were going to?
>
>> That's what *Dana* is going to do (and go round and
>> round and round in the circle game).
>
>Ooooooooh, so now he's telling you his plans, is he? I seeee.
>
He posted that it was his intention. Another example that you have no
idea what you got yourself into.
>> [defensive posturing about masturbation.]
>
>BWAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAAA !!!!!!
>
>Let's look at the portion snipped, since jet's as good at summarizing as
>she is with flaming.
>***********
>> If that's the
>> reason you started masturbaiting over this thread, you've wasted time and
>> a perfectly good wank.
>
>I just said bring your buddies and come "educate" me. There wasn't
>masturbation involved. I prefer live women instead of text based
>messages to fulfill my sexual needs.
>
>*********************
>
The last sentence is defensive posturing. If you can't make a valid point,
don't unecessarily add to the line count. I picked this post up but I'm
not going to answer posts that exceed 1000 lines, for no reason.
>You made my point for me. Again.
>
>Just give it up Jet, you aren't good at this.
>
I'm excellent at this. :) I really hadn't realized, until this thread,
that you aren't very bright. I previously thought you were clever, almost
as amusing and creative as mimus. I'm amazed that I missed your lack
of wit.
You really think you're winning, don't you? That's funny. I was just
thinking that you've reached the point where nothing you say is relevent
and how I don't even need to pay attention, anymore. Everything you say
is padding, because you believe you win a flame war by being the last
person standing, even if you look like a bleeding clown and your argument
is shattered.
You're such a generic, cardboard cut-out flamer that, without checking,
I couldn't tell your from any number of lusers. A couple times I've had
problems remembering who you are.
jet
and writing Greg <hearts> Sheryl on your notebook.
>candle
>"and people say I lack originality?"
>
They sure do.
Liberalminded (That d00d Jet Has to PLONK and yet say my name in every post she does cause she is a chicken shit asshole)
making sure goggle keeps forever :
Truths:
Jet and I had no problems till recently. Our *problems* began when I
spanked Skippy over his constant Gary Burnore is a pedo posts in nanau. The
only real issue here is that Jet and her pals have a big woody for DB6 and
anybody who defends DB6. Right or wrong does not matter.
Jet has way too much free time.
And on that topic of free time I am going to try and use what I have today
not posting.
|
|
| --
| jet mhm 32x30 |
| wee saul disciple #32 |
| ich bin ein meower |
--
ITU member in bad standing fer as long as it exists
mhm32x20 Can ya say Meow?
Royal Pain in the Assbasturderr to the Land of Snuh and Meow as well as
Usenet at large.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a938c1$8ud$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
> In article <Xns91ECDD27C13...@207.14.113.17>,
> "spo...@petitmorte.net" <spo...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>>news:a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
>>
>>[...]
>>> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> prior to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for
>>> "years".
>>
>>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>>
>>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of
>>2000.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Which is a pretty clear indication I -wasn't- at war with databasix
> then or I wouldn't get an account there, idiot. I had the account
Jet, dear, you're being called, *again*, on your bullshit about having had
a flame war with me in February, 2001. That was your claim, not mine.
Do pay some level of attention to your own words, m'kay?
> until April 12, 2001, after the flame war started in early March of
> 2001.
Not in February as you originally said. How many times did you try and
wriggle out of that when you were first caught?
>>That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
>>little over a year ago."
<Whistles>
>>It's taken about a month, but I see that you're finally confessing
>>that you lied in the post I've referenced.
>>
>>Good show.
>>
>>Oh, yeah....
>>
>>To quote you: "Spank!"
>>
> -You- aren't databasix and I disliked you long before I got my
> databasix account in November 2000. Get over it, dumbshit. All you are
> is a long term usenet dullard who, once again, has made a fool of
> himself. Even your co-users at databasix thought you were boring as
> shit.
I know this is hard for you to understand, but I don't give a flying fuck
how you feel about anything. You were full of shit when you originally
claimed that you and I "... were at worse odds in February 2001..." Talk
about making a fool of one's self, you've changed your story, and don't
have the balls to even admit it when it's waved in your face.
I understand that Usenet is life for you, Jet. Why elsewould it matter
what other people think, Jet? Is Usenet approval that important to you?
If it is, then I'll re-invite you to have that up close and personal
experience with a razorblade as I have in the past. Kill yourself, girl.
You're obviously suffering horribly at the hands of fate.
Let's look at your words again:
----
Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of 2000.
That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
little over a year ago."
-----
Pure, unpasturized bullshit, Jet.
Take that spank like an adult. And take a second one for forgetting that
you are ignoring me, you loon.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a93m4u$9kf$1...@dosa.alt.net:
>>candle
>>"and people say I lack originality?"
>>
> They sure do.
A sign of the lack of veracity your words have is that you often cite what
"others" think/say to support your "flames".
Face it, Loon, you haven't the backbone to stand up for your own words, you
need to have phantom sympathizers on your side.
It must be lonely there in your garage, listening to the dustbunnies cheer
you on in your crusade to make parts of Usenet in your own image. It makes
perfect sense that you'd rely on those ghostly voices for comfort.
You're a sad-sack of shit, Jet.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a93jg0$d01$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
> Pleasepleaseplease, provide *one* example of me laying low, after being
> flamed. Just one. Pwetty pwease.
I'll, be glad to.
After I exposed the bullshit contained in:
Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of 2000.
That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
little over a year ago."
And proved that we exchanged *zero* posts in February 2001, you decided
you'd "ignore" me.
That's laying low.
HTH, Loon.
Say, didn't I see you "flaming" someone for using baby-talk?
trippy
<Xns91EDBFB50B6...@207.14.113.10>, said the following tripped
out things....
Gosh, Jet laid low, until she got the balls to try and face you again.
Why, that would make me right, wouldn't it?
SPanK for that too.
Oh wait, there would be more. This would also mean that there was a lull
before hostilites started again, wouldn't it?
Me thinks it would, spANk on jet again.
Hey, I called it, and said she'd prove me right sooner or later,
probably sooner.
SpNaK on jet, for that one too.
Wow, 3 spanks coming from 2 of your posts, and all you had to do was
show up. And I thought christmas had already come and gone. Thank you
very much Santa Spooge.
jet
>morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>news:a93jg0$d01$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
>
>> Pleasepleaseplease, provide *one* example of me laying low, after being
>> flamed. Just one. Pwetty pwease.
>
>I'll, be glad to.
>
>After I exposed the bullshit contained in:
>
>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of 2000.
>That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
>little over a year ago."
>
>And proved that we exchanged *zero* posts in February 2001, you decided
>you'd "ignore" me.
>
>That's laying low.
>
they do. I never left usenet.
>HTH, Loon.
>
>Say, didn't I see you "flaming" someone for using baby-talk?
>
Uh huh. I hate the shit, but it seems to be the only thing some
people understand.
jet
think you're an over-amped clown.
>> I understand that Usenet is life for you, Jet. Why elsewould it matter
>> what other people think, Jet? Is Usenet approval that important to you?
>> If it is, then I'll re-invite you to have that up close and personal
>> experience with a razorblade as I have in the past. Kill yourself, girl.
>
Okay. I'll consider it, if it means so much to you.
>> You're obviously suffering horribly at the hands of fate.
>>
>> Let's look at your words again:
>> ----
>> Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>> "You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of 2000.
>> That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of 2001, a
>> little over a year ago."
>> -----
>>
>> Pure, unpasturized bullshit, Jet.
>>
>> Take that spank like an adult. And take a second one for forgetting that
>> you are ignoring me, you loon.
>
>Gosh, Jet laid low, until she got the balls to try and face you again.
>Why, that would make me right, wouldn't it?
>
>SPanK for that too.
>
>Oh wait, there would be more. This would also mean that there was a lull
>before hostilites started again, wouldn't it?
>
No. Hostilities never ended. Spooge has continued to post about me
the entire time. He still isn't databasix. He doesn't even have an
account there.
>Me thinks it would, spANk on jet again.
>
>Hey, I called it, and said she'd prove me right sooner or later,
>probably sooner.
>
>SpNaK on jet, for that one too.
>
>Wow, 3 spanks coming from 2 of your posts, and all you had to do was
>show up. And I thought christmas had already come and gone. Thank you
>very much Santa Spooge.
>
Sure, hon, claim them while you can. Of course I've never left usenet
or stopped posting because I flamed out, but you don't even keep track
of what -you- say, so I'm not surprised.
jet
>morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>news:a93m4u$9kf$1...@dosa.alt.net:
>
>>>candle
>>>"and people say I lack originality?"
>>>
>> They sure do.
>
>A sign of the lack of veracity your words have is that you often cite what
>"others" think/say to support your "flames".
>
case you didn't notice, that means you called him a liar.
>Face it, Loon, you haven't the backbone to stand up for your own words, you
>need to have phantom sympathizers on your side.
>
>It must be lonely there in your garage, listening to the dustbunnies cheer
>you on in your crusade to make parts of Usenet in your own image. It makes
>perfect sense that you'd rely on those ghostly voices for comfort.
>
>You're a sad-sack of shit, Jet.
>
Are you ever going to get over this obsession, John? You've been going
on like this for months, as if it matters to anyone but you. Try acting
like a man, for a change.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:20020411013723...@mb-fc.aol.com:
>>> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte
>>> prior to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for
>>> "years".
>>
>>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>>
>>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of
>>2000. That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of
>>2001, a little over a year ago."
>
> *************
> Say, didn't you once claim there was no connection between db6 and
> pedomorte?
More than once, Dave. What does the word "or" mean on your planet?
trippy
Acknowledgement noted.
Awwww, don't go away mad Jet, just go away.
> Of course I've never left usenet
> or stopped posting because I flamed out, but you don't even keep track
> of what -you- say, so I'm not surprised.
Laying low doesn't have to equal leaving usenet you loon.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a95huo$ih5$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
> In article <MPG.1720035f1...@news.alt.net>, trippy
> <tri...@spam.sucks> wrote:
>>This dude, "spo...@petitmorte.net" spo...@petitmorte.net, in message
>><Xns91EDBFB50B6...@207.14.113.10>, said the following
>>tripped out things....
>>> morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>>> news:a938c1$8ud$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
[...]
>>> I know this is hard for you to understand, but I don't give a flying
>>> fuck how you feel about anything. You were full of shit when you
>>> originally claimed that you and I "... were at worse odds in
>>> February 2001..." Talk about making a fool of one's self, you've
>>> changed your story, and don't have the balls to even admit it when
>>> it's waved in your face.
>>>
> We were at worse odds then. I despised you, back then, while I not
> just think you're an over-amped clown.
Jet, dearie, you don't really have to keep exhibiting your lack of grasp on
reality. I already proved to you that there was *zero* posts exchanged
between you and I in February 2001, contrary to your claim.
Observe:
Start Google stats for February 2001
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=jet&as_uauthors=spo...@petitmorte.net%
20&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=
2001&hl=en
Your search - jet author:spo...@petitmorte.net - did not match any messages
posted between 1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001.
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=jet&as_uauthors=spo...@databasix.com%2
0&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2
001&hl=en
Your search - jet author:spo...@databasix.com - did not match any messages
posted between 1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001.
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=jet&as_uauthors=spo...@lart.com%20&as_
drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2001&h
l=en
Your search - jet author:spo...@lart.com - did not match any messages
posted between 1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001.
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=jet&as_uauthors=spooge%20&as_drrb=b&as
_mind=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2001&hl=en
Your search - jet author:spooge - did not match any messages posted between
1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=spooge&as_uauthors=jet&as_drrb=b&as_mi
nd=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2001&hl=en
Your search - spooge author:jet - did not match any messages posted between
1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001.
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=spooge&as_uauthors=%20...@untool.net&a
s_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=28&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2001
&hl=en
Your search - spooge author:j...@untool.net - did not match any messages
posted between 1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&as_drrb=b&q=spooge+author%3Amorrigan@
pyrophore.ogoense.net&btnG=Google+Search&as_mind=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&a
s_maxd=28&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2001
Your search - spooge author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net - did not match
any messages posted between 1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&as_drrb=b&q=spooge+author%3AjuniperNO
juS...@ptw.com.invalid&btnG=Google+Search&as_mind=1&as_minm=2&as_miny=2001&
as_maxd=28&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2001
Your search - spooge author:juniper...@ptw.com.invalid - did not match
any messages posted between 1 Feb 2001 and 28 Feb 2001.
End Google stats for February 2001.
A grand total of *zero*.
To the best of my recollection, the first post I ever directed at you was
after you had flamed out of DataBasix. I called you a mission poster. You
then preceded to prove my point in the ensuing months. We exchanged
exactly 0 posts on the DB internals, as I recall. If you were already
hating me before we'd butted heads, then that was just you building up a
rather unhealthy obsession with my Usenet doings. Until you'd been set
afire in the DB internals I barely knew that you even existed.
>>> I understand that Usenet is life for you, Jet. Why elsewould it
>>> matter what other people think, Jet? Is Usenet approval that
>>> important to you? If it is, then I'll re-invite you to have that up
>>> close and personal experience with a razorblade as I have in the
>>> past. Kill yourself, girl.
>>
> Okay. I'll consider it, if it means so much to you.
It's not for me, heavens no. Why would I want one of my chew toys to go
away? I enjoy verbally assaulting you. it's fun. from this POV, anyways.
I know you won't agree. Like I care. :)
>>> You're obviously suffering horribly at the hands of fate.
>>>
>>> Let's look at your words again:
>>> ----
>>> Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>>> "You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of
>>> 2000. That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of
>>> 2001, a little over a year ago."
>>> -----
>>>
>>> Pure, unpasturized bullshit, Jet.
>>>
>>> Take that spank like an adult. And take a second one for forgetting
>>> that you are ignoring me, you loon.
>>
>>Gosh, Jet laid low, until she got the balls to try and face you again.
>>Why, that would make me right, wouldn't it?
>>
>>SPanK for that too.
>>
>>Oh wait, there would be more. This would also mean that there was a
>>lull before hostilites started again, wouldn't it?
>>
> No. Hostilities never ended. Spooge has continued to post about me
> the entire time. He still isn't databasix. He doesn't even have an
> account there.
Jet, you've made numerous posts invoking nym ever since you announced you
were running away^h^h^h^ignoring me. I've not mentioned you other than to
intercede here when you've fibbed your way into my line of sight.
You're much better off really ignoring me, Jet. You never make it through
these exchanges without losing your cool.
>>Me thinks it would, spANk on jet again.
>>
>>Hey, I called it, and said she'd prove me right sooner or later,
>>probably sooner.
>>
>>SpNaK on jet, for that one too.
>>
>>Wow, 3 spanks coming from 2 of your posts, and all you had to do was
>>show up. And I thought christmas had already come and gone. Thank you
>>very much Santa Spooge.
>>
> Sure, hon, claim them while you can. Of course I've never left usenet
> or stopped posting because I flamed out, but you don't even keep track
> of what -you- say, so I'm not surprised.
Laying low is hiding, you witless Loon.
trippy
> In article <MPG.171ebd1dd...@news.alt.net>, trippy <tri...@spam.sucks> wrote:
> >This dude, "jet" morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net, in message
> ><a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>, said the following tripped out
> >things....
> >> In article <MPG.171e70c85...@news.alt.net>, trippy
> >> <tri...@spam.sucks> wrote:
> >> >This dude, "jet" morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net, in message
> >> ><a90bfi$s5v$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>, said the following tripped out
> >> >things....
> >> <trippy,jet,trippy,jet. Repeat as needed>
> >> >> [outrageous line count]
> >> >{cope with it}
> >> No thanks, I'll continue going
> >> [snip]
> >> That's what those things (below) in brackets are; a summary of the things
> >> being snipped, not a response to you.
> >
> >No shit? Really? Gosh Jet, thanks. Where would I be without your divine
> >guidance?
> >
> You'd be making a fool of yourself, still answering the snippage
> indicators.
When you make statements in them, using your lack of ability to
comprehehend reality, yeah, they'll get a response. You aren't snipping
for space, you're trying to make these insipid little points which don't
reflect AT ALL what was actually said.
That's pretty weak jet, even for you.
>
> >Pssst....that was more sarcasm.
> >
> It was more of an autoflame, since you don't seem to know what you
> did.
>
Like calling you out on dishonest snipping? I know I've been doing that.
> [trippy doesn't know English]
>
> [trippy shows he still doesn't know the differene between a question
> and a statement of intent.]
>
> >> Lame trolls have educated you well, Grasshopper.
> >
> >Lame trolls haven't educated me at all, maybe that's why I actually
> >*win* flamewars.
> >
> I've never seen you do so. PPOR.
>
You won't have to look any farther than this thread.
> [trippy gets involved because he can't tell a question from a statement
> of intent.]
>
Still trying to deny your backpedal I see. It figures. Jet, you gotta
get over it. I called you out, and you backed down. That's probabbly the
reason you still keep replying, since you just can't handle that. You
gonna turn into some obsessed fangurl now? Oh wait, I already know the
answer to that one.
> >> Pointing out that usenet connects to RL is not shooting
> >> myself in the foot, nor is saying that an endless stream of billing and
> >> cooing between two people is very boring (something others have pointed
> >> out as well).
> >
> >Connects by what? ICQ? E-mail? Personal visits I could see, or if you
> >made a genuine friendship, but don't sit there and tell me that everyone
> >who reads my posts thinks of me as a real life person and actually knows
> >me, because that's just bullshit.
> >
> I realize most of your friends write like bots but there -are- RL people
> sitting behind the keyboards writing the words. Didn't you know that?
Yes Jet, there's real life people behind the keyboards. I wouldn't even
begin to claim I know them all though. I wouldn't claim that all of
those real life people know me, or that they think of me outside of
usenet. I'm sure that most of these real life people behind the
keyboards don't even think about me, when they shut down their
newsreader. To most people, I'm just another name for the From line. Now
I will say that I know people I've met from usenet, and have formed
genuine friendships with them. I've told them about my life, and have
been honest with them, and have no reason to think they haven't done the
same. The number of genuine friendships I've made though is a small
proportion of the number of real life people sitting behind keyboards
though.
I don't expect you to understand, so I'll do my best to spell it out for
you. You aren't the bright star of something everyone looks at jet, you
are a lame poster on a thing which most people from ISP's don't even
look at. Nobody's looking to know you, because real life people behind
keyboards are a dime a dozen. Message boards are everywhere, this is
just one of them. In short jet, you just aren't that important. I'm only
kicking your ass in this flamewar because it amuses me to do so. Nobody
has to read it if they don't want to, there's just too many choices out
there. I'd say there's probably 20 people reading this, max, if anyone
cares at all, besides you and me. So yes, Jet, there's real life people
behind the keyboards, and they're doing other shit. You don't have an
"audience", and I don't have an "audience".
>
>
> >No bootlickers in nana*, nope, nosireee. Everyone's in there because of
> >their pure, innocent concern for the net.
> >
> What does that have to do with most nanap regs thinking Dana is a moron?
>
Most of the buttlicks in nanap think everyone's a moron. nanap,
while sometimes serving an actual purpose is a magnet for every self-
important doofus that thinks that his/her opinion matters to an internet
community that doesn't even care about usenet. Oh, sure, there's some
good ones in nanap, there usually is one or two in every nana* gorup,
but for the most part it's chock full of bootlickers and apple
polishers, you being one of them.
> >> >> I think the hyping of Greg and Miscreant's romance, immediately after the
> >> >> months of spooning and mooning with Rocky (someone I'm quite fond of) is
> >> >> about as tasteless as anything I've ever seen; not because it hurts Rocky
> >> >> but because it's so obliviously tactless.
> >> >
> >> >Guess what jet, I've talked to all, ALL of the ones involved on a
> >> >regular basis. Rocky's not hurting for new prospects,
> >> >
> >> That's what I said: "not because it hurts Rocky".
> >
> >Not the same thing, learn to read.
> >
> I -wrote- it you stupid toad.
>
And displayed a stunning lack of comprehension doing it. Maybe you need
a remedial english class or hooked on phonics or something.
> [trippy doesn't care about the flood of Greg <hearts> Miscreant posts,
> so nobody else should]
>
> >> If they're going to make it the highest volume thread in two groups
> >
> >2 groups?
> >
> >Let's see. APFR -- Where they normally post, so I can't see how that
> >would give any credence to what you say, since it wouldn't be a
> >disruption of anything.
> >
> What I said was they made it the highest volume thread.
So what? If it wasn't that thread, some other thread would be. The one
with the most posts is the highest volume thread. Would you be railing
against it if Greg and I were talking hockey? Would you be railing
against it if Per and I were talking about music? Maybe everyone should
make sure all the threads have the same number of posts, since you have
such a problem with threads being longer or shorter than others. Hey,
maybe we should have the same content in them, since different subjects
lead to different thread lengths, you know, that pesky problem of saying
different things about different subjects. Maybe certain people
shouldn't post either, since they don't post at regularly scheduled
intervals, and we can't predict their effect on the numbers, so we
should have the exact same poster, post the exact same things, so that
the threads come out all nice and even for you.
Give me a fucking break. No one's making you read APFR, so feel free to
not subscribe. You don't want to see something, killfile the bad words
that make your eyes burn. Plonk people all you want. It's your
newsreader, and I don't really care who you plonk or don't plonk. But
don't come whining that a thread's the longest on a group, becuase some
thread's going to be the longest on EVERY GROUP, and the only thing
you're bent about is the content. Welcome to usenet, where people don't
just post shit only to entertain your dumb ass. The Greg hearts Mis
thread is the longest thread? Great. Get over it.
> How does it
> not being disruptive have anything to do with whether anyone comments
> on it?
>
Well, nothing, which is why your hyperspastic posting about it is
completely retarded. Here's a hint for you Jet, people are used to long
threads in the flonk and the penguin group. I know that must bother you,
so hey, maybe we should limit the length of threads, in addtion to
making sure they're all the same length, not to mention making sure that
certain people don't post, and making sure they all talk about the same
thing. Oh, and since you're so egocentric, maybe we should make them all
about you.
Or not.
> >Aaaaaaand what other group?
> >
> >Exactly.
> >
> The Flonk.
Don't forget that who's on first cascade, oh wait, that has more posts,
and it's not about candle/miscreant, so that doesn't count. How 'bout
the great idea for revitalizing punk rock bands thread? Oh, wait, that
has more posts too, as well as not being about candle/miscreant so never
mind. Yeah, it's gotta be the candle/mis threads, because those are the
ones that just burn your ass the most. Never mind the fact that there
are longer threads, or that the candle/miscreant threads aren't a
disruption of anything, because you just don't want to hear it.
>
> >> , it's
> >> going to get commented on, much like the Kate goes postal over the break
> >> up with OpI thread.
> >
> >Did Rocky go postal on usenet? Did Miscreant? Then it really doesn't
> >apply, does it?
> >
> Misc (I hate flaming) decided to start flaming Rocky for his posts so,
> yes, it does apply but, that isn't what I said or implied.
Yeah, how dare they post and offend your usenet sensibilities. If you're
*that* fragile, maybe you should hang it up. You probably should anyway,
but you're just the little trooper, running from losing flamewar to
losing flamewar, not caring how badly you get torched because it's all
in the name of keeping your mind sharp, which is patently false, because
it implies that it was sharp in the first place.
> The Greg/Misc
> thread was a high volume, personal thread between 2 people, as was the
> Kate/OpI one.
And what? I flamed Kate for the shit was talking, not because she was
posting a high volume, personal thread. What part of that is so
difficult for you to understand? Oh yeah, the part where you'd actually
have to make an assertion based on something you actually have a clue
about.
> The more high volume a thread is, the more likely it is to
> be eventually commented on, whether it's disruptive or not.
>
> >Since you're clue impaired here's the answer:
> >
> >No.
> >
> Wrong again.
What? No brackets that say you snipped? Why, that would be a dishonest
post edit, wouldn't it? That's pretty dishonest for someone who should
know the rules since she's been there "from the beginning".
>
> >> >Oh, it did. It helped me see what a fucking freak you are.
> >> >
> >> How's that?
> >
> >It showed that you took Rocky and Mis's breakup harder than they did?
> >
> Um, I was delighted that they broke up, dimwit.
Did you cheer? Did you hold a party? It wouldn't surprise me,
considering how usenet is real life to you.
> Rocky can do and has done
> much better than Mis.
>
You should spread wider, England's far away.
> >See, unlike you, I don't burn half of the people involved when something
> >happens to their relationship. That would make me look, gosh what's that
> >word, oh yeah, VAPID.
> >
> How would burning the people involved be vapid?
INFINTIY
BONK
INFINITY
BONK
INFINITY
BONK
(psst.....still need help on whether that's UPA or not?
BWAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAAA !!!!)
> You still don't know
> what it means, or you wouldn't use it so totally out of context.
>
People who burn people once their relationship ends are vapid. What's so
hard about comprehending the context of that? You aren't real smart, are
you?
> > Then to have you go and try and justify that
> >behavior makes you look like, Oh I don't know, A FREAK?
> >
> I do realize it was unusual for me to agree with Afffinity but I don't
> think it makes me a freak.
>
See, there's your first problem, you tried to think. You don't do it
much, so you don't do it real well. Well, keep trying spanky, maybe one
day those little misfiring synapses of yours will come together and
produce a thought that doesn't seem like it was created by a brain dead
child.
> >> Dana -is- known a a high volume, lame sock puppet and Greg
> >> and Misc -have- been posting volumes about their great love, and the
> >> predominant responses I've seen have been to tell them to get a room. I'm
> >> sure you can explain how commenting on that makes me a freak, starting
> >> here:
> >> ---------start lucid explanation--------
> >
> >I said it before, one response up, and if you were as smart as you
> >claimed you were, you would have figured it out loooooong before now. No
> >amount of lucid explanation is going to make you grow a brain. Brains
> >just don't work that way.
> >
> Spank.
<Translation>
WAAAAAAAAAAH !!!! I DIDN'T GET MY FREE CLUUUUUUUUE !!!!! YOU DIDN'T JUMP
THROUGH MY HOOOOOOP !! WAAAAAAAAH !!!!!!
</Translation>
Would you like some cheese with that whine?
> nable to explain how making factual remarks about 3 usenet posters
> makes me a freak.
That WOULD be right, except for one simple oversight on your part. Your
opinion isn't fact. If you think so, then you're even worse off than I
thought.
>
>
> >> >> >makes you look unstable, because you go off on these little binges of
> >> >> >what you think is flaming, when in reality, it's just you pissing and
> >> >> >moaning about what other people write.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Flaming -is- just pissing and moaning about what other people write,
> >> >> but with a bit of style.
> >> >
> >> >Well, if that's what you think it is, that explains why you lose so
> >> >badly at it.
> >> >
> >> So what is -your- opposing definition of flaming?
> >
> >Here's a hint: Pissing and moaning have nothing to do with it.
> >
> That isn't a definition.
And? What? Are you gonna whine for more free clues? It won't do you much
good, but it'll be fun to watch.
>Pissing and moaning, with style, about what other
> people write is what flamers do. You do know that pissing and moaning is
> a -very- common euphemism for complaining, don't you? I'm beginning to
> wonder if we speak the same language.
>
I speak English, with coherent thought patterns. You speak english
without coherent thought patterns. Therein lies all the difference.
> Now, what is your dissenting definition of flaming?
>
Like I said before, no free clues for you. If you don't get it, then you
have no business flaming.
> [...]
> >> You haven't provided the slightest reference for your conclusion, yet. You
> >> can list the quotes that make me the dumbest thing since Kate here:
> >
> >I can.
> >
> >But you should've been able to figure out what they were by now, so no
> >free clues for you.
> >
> >> --------begin list-----------
> >>
> >
> >You fill in the list, then you might have some slight insight into what
> >you're doing wrong. Like I said, i'm not here to babysit.
> >
> Spank.
<Translation>
WAAAAAAAH !!! YOU DIDN'T JUMP WHEN I TOLD YOU TOOOOOOOOO !!!!! I NEED
THAT CLUE REAL BAAAAAAD !! C'MON, I REALLY REALLY NEEED IT !!
</Translation>
>Unable to give a single example to support statement that I'm
> the dumbest thing since Kte.
>
> >> I'm sorry I have to do this but you never seem to back up what you say.
> >
> >You are sorry, yes.
> >
> Ikyabwai. Again.
>
> >As for backing up what I've had to say, I have. I haven't even had to go
> >to google to do it either. Common sense is a beautiful thing. Google
> >doesn't quantify concepts, which you have no clue about.
> >
> Google provides facts, which you keep evading, spankard.
No, Google archives posts, and directs people to webpages. I guess
that's why they bill themselves as a search engine with a full usenet
archive, not as a distributor of facts.
I have no need to evade. You haven't posted anything about my concept
that you're a vapid bitch, who had a bunch of flamewars with spooge
which you lost badly, and you're gonna lay low until you get the nads to
try again, that's been wrong yet. I however, elsewhere in this thread
have already proven quite a few things I said. I'll leave you to find
it, since you like to do that kind of thing. Clock's ticking,
tickticktick. Run through that hoop jet, runrunrun.
You can retract your quite questionable spank claim now.
You're welcome.
>
> >> When asked, you say you don't have time to explain, even though you have
> >> time to write an 800 line post. Now, let's see the logic you claim you've
> >> been using.
> >
> >Not all of those 800 lines are mine, are they? Hey, tell ya what, I'll
> >even drop the sig, which will reduce even more lines.
> >
> >Idiot.
> >
> Spank.
What part of "Not all those 800 lines are all mine" didn't you
understand? I know you're hurting for clues and everything, but really,
if you don't know, you should just ask. You won't get any help from me,
because it's not to my advantage to help you. See, jet, we're in a
flamewar. I don't have to do ANYTHING until I choose to, and in fact
that's exactly what's gonna happen. So, you can sit there and cry spank
as many times as you want, and in fact, please do. It just makes you
look all the more stupid when you realize how horribly you've been
played.
>All these reply cycles and you still don't have time to explain
> your own ridiculous conclusions or allegations, and dodge when asked to.
I've dodged nothing. I will pick the times of the things I reveal. Not
you.
>
> [...]
> >[Let's see what Jet snipped, just for grins, shall we?]
> >
> >> Someone who thinks I'm dumb is about as credible as
> >> someone who thinks I'm vapid, anyway. <g>
> >
> >Gotta love that unintentional irony. Nice backfire flame. If you shoot
> >yourself in the foot much more, I won't even have to reply.
> >
> I'm neither lifeless, insipid nor dumb. There was no irony.
And you say you can read.
>
> >[Yeah, go figger]
> >
> >Good job ace.
> >
> Why continue to discuss it when you don't know what it means?
I guess making my words really, really big would be like yelling at
someone who doesn't know english. You're not gonna understand no matter
what I say.
>I don't
> think you know what irony means, either, or you wouldn't have said such
> an asinine thing.
>
*shakes head*
Poor, sad Jet.
> >> >> If you can show that I think I'm the sole arbiter of what's UPA, I'll
> >> >> happily take the short bus. I would think my regular disclaimers, stating
> >> >> that I'm -not- would have been a pretty good clue, even for you.
> >> >
> >> >******
> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Someone who's been around from the beginning of it and knows what it
> >> >> >> >> isn't.
> >> >
> >> >*******
> >> >
> >> >Ask not for whom the bus honks, it honks for you.
> >> >
> >> Where's the part about being the *sole arbiter*?
> >
> >In your attitude regarding things UPA and who you think should be
> >posting.
> >
> Repeat and expand:
No.
I don't do things on command for a self-important flamer wannabe.
>Where's the part of what I've ever written that shows
> I think I'm the sole arbiter of UPA? I'd like to know how you can read my
> mind and find things that contradict my explicit, written disclaimers.
>
> You're defensiveness about your own lack of ability doesn't mean I have an
> attitude about it.
>
I need no defensiveness about my perceived lack of ability from a
complete spankard who can't follow concepts.
HTH
> >> >> >> When I expressed my opinion and made no claims about
> >> >> >> anyone else's opinion.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >When you take your opinion, and try to make it sound like the official
> >> >> >opinion of the flonk.
> >>
> >> [ha]
> >> >> Official? You've lost your mind.
> >> >
> >> >No, you've lost your mind, for taking your opinion and saying that's the
> >> >way it should be.
> >> >
> >> Why shouldn't I have an opinion about the way it should be?
> >
> >I didn't say you shouldn't have an opinion of how it should be. What you
> >don't realize is that yours isn't the only one, and using your opinion
> >without some rationality behind it is a piss poor way to prove your
> >point.
> >
> I realize my opinion isn't the only one.
Funny, I can't tell that from your posts, or that you realize anything
at all, for that matter.
>As far as rationality, I'm
> certainly not the only one who's expressed displeasure with the current
> state of UPA. Are you saying anyone who agrees with me is irrational, too?
>
No, but you're the only one but infinity that I've seen that's doing it
because of what Miscreant and Candle have written.
> >> I'm not
> >> cancelling or netcopping anyone who has other views.
> >
> >Only because it would get you booted off your ISP, I'm sure.
> >
> Uh huh. You've just made a clear accusation that, if it weren't for the
> possibility of losing my account, I would be cancelling posts from people
> I disagree with.
I wouldn't put it past you. You're driven by your ego, which can't
handle the fact that I'm whupping your ass all up and down this thread,
and given your tendencies to dishonestly post edit, and describe
portions of the thread by trying to redirect through the tag without a
basis based on the portion snipped out, which I've already caught you
doing and displayed, yeah if the tool was there, you'd take advantage of
it.
I expect you to post some rationale for that allegation
> or retract it immediately. Don't backpedal, just apologise, boy. Now.
>
No.
You get neither apology, nor retraction.
I don't jump for people, and I'm not gonna start with you, slut.
> >> >> I've heard the battle cry of the War Geese and dreamed of them flying
> >> >> south in winter.
> >> >
> >> >Uh........you coming back to earth anytime soon?
> >> >
> >> A Flonker would have understood.
> >
> >So because you throw out a non-sequiter, which by the way you said you
> >hate, that makes you a flonker?
> >
> >Ooooooookay.
> >
> It wasn't, in any way, a non-sequitur.
When you post a sentence that doesn't connect to the previous one, that
would be a non-sequiter, regardless if it's a flonk reference or not. Do
you not know what non-sequiter means?
>It was an easily found A2VF3
> reference. Go to Google. Lookup the phrase War Geese in the Flonk.
> Then look for a post from Flaagg talking about being out one winter
> morning and seeing geese flying south.
>
Why? You've already proven you don't know what a non-sequiter is, so why
do I need to do all that work? I don't.
> >> No, I just said "the only such posters I'm aware of [here] are RussellB
> >> and spooge.
> >
> >Which here is here? This is crossposted to 5 groups. Since 2 of them are
> >considered UPA groups, and you, by your own admission are not a UPA
> >artist, that leaves ahm, which you're not exactly the bright star in the
> >sky, or the penguin froup, in which you're not exactly the bright star
> >in the sky.
> >
> >Oh, and alt.flame.
> >
> >Niiiiiiice shootin' Tex !!
> >
> Spank.
Based on your assertion that there's 2 posters posting from databasix?
BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAA !!!!
Try not to be so ridiculous with your spnak claims.
>What does that have to do with me not being aware of any posters
> from Databasix, in -any- of those groups, other than spooge or RussellB.
> Respond to what's written, please.
>
Or say, little toad, who uses databasix, who's also whupped your ass a
time or two.
> >> If there are more, they're either killfiled or I just don't
> >> read them. I have no idea how many posters DB6 has and people can't post
> >> from petitmorte.
> >> -------start list of other db6 posters here-----------
> >
> >If you can't figure that out, why the hell should I tell you, since it
> >works to my advantage NOT to? Answer me that, then maybe you'll get
> >these inane lists you so desperately crave. Of course, if you could fill
> >in the blanks in the first place, you wouldn't be in the situation
> >you're in now.
> >
> Spank. Unable to provide names of other DB6 posters.
Little Toad.
Now you know why I waited. Here's yet another hint slut, I don't bluff.
Ever.
Here's yet another hint. "Won't dance for you" doesn't meant the same as
"Can't produce evidence".
Care to make yet another baseless spank claim? You probably will.
>
>
> >> Obviously, I didn't come "here" to flame DB6ers, if I was "here" before
> >> they were.
> >
> >Interesting claim, since google has
> >author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net archived only through early 2002.
> >and alt.fan.jet since 1999, in which before the year 2000, no posts
> >showed up under "jet" period. So obviously, you used another name, or
> >another reply addy, without either of which, nothing can be proven.
> >Conviennt, that.
> >
> I didn't archive.
Also convienent, but a lot of people do that, so I'd have to connect you
to flame threads somehow, and to be honest, I can torch you with what I
have now.
>Look up replies where the attributions include
> Jun...@ptw.com, jet at untool.net or morrigan at ogoense.net. If
> you need earlier ones, I'll try to remember my qnet.net, unr.net and
> sprynet.com addresses. There were also posts made under my legal first
> name.
>
I don't care what your name is. If I work up the inkling I'll go see
your posts. I'm sure there's info that can be gleaned from it, should I
feel the need to use it. I'll let it ride for now, as what I have is
sufficient.
>
> >> That makes spooge wrong (about what you said above). Clear now?
> >
> >If you care to provide another name or reply addy, it would be made much
> >clearer than just muck from a bottom feeder.
> >
> About coming here to pick fights with databasix users? I had an account
> at databasix and was on good terms with users other than spooge from Nov,
> 2000 to April 2001.
Don't you mean user? After all, you said you only knew of one other
Databasix users other than Russell B. Since you're gonna whine 'PROOF !
PROOF!", here's the quote from your very own spank claim, made from in
this very thread.
********
If there are more, they're either killfiled or I just don't
> >> read them. I have no idea how many posters DB6 has and people can't post
> >> from petitmorte.
> >> -------start list of other db6 posters here-----------
> >
> >If you can't figure that out, why the hell should I tell you, since it
> >works to my advantage NOT to? [SniP MY own stuff]
> Spank. Unable to provide names of other DB6 posters.
****************
Spank.
>How could I be at war with them prior to that? I can
> provide references who will say I was posting to UPA and Meower groups
> before I got the databasix account. Want the names?
Sure, if you wanna give them and give me more ammo.
>
> [trippy says others beat me at flame wars, besides RussellB and Rocky,
> because they say so. <snicker>]
>
> People I've been in flame wars with, other than RB and Rocky:
> 1. Romath-win
> 2. Zazlee-win
> 3. David Sterling-win
> 4. Gary Burnore-win
> 5. Belinda Burnore-win
> 6. spooge-win (though contested)
> 7. MnD and others in alt.swingers-win
> 8. Some kooks in the Jerry Ryan group (accompanied by SharonB)-win
> 9. Affinity-tie
> 10. little toad-win
Well, the only 2 I know of are the ones with spooge (obviously) and
little toad. The rest, I have no real concern whether or not you won or
not, but my instincts tell me you didn't.
But wait, before you get all glowy, and trying to say I don't know what
I'm talking about, I'll say I can prove it.
I'm gonna spank you twice with the same spank claim.
Here's your spank claim, look familiar?
************************
If there are more, they're either killfiled or I just don't
> >> read them. I have no idea how many posters DB6 has and people can't post
> >> from petitmorte.
> >> -------start list of other db6 posters here-----------
> >
> >If you can't figure that out, why the hell should I tell you, since it
> >works to my advantage NOT to? [SniP MY own stuff]
> Spank. Unable to provide names of other DB6 posters.
********************
Now add to it, this little tidbit, which was taken from google.
***************
From: jet (morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net)
Subject: Re: Ping Sharon: Re: Rebecca "More Power!" Ore <was Re: Lookie
what I found crawling out of the woodwork <was Re: [BOB] - Phase 2 of
the Invasion...>>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.usenet.kooks
View: Complete Thread (16 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-05-19 19:20:04 PST
In article <9e6vak$ci0$1...@dimpledchad.databasix.com>, "Sadistic Emperor
Agente da la Cabala, Numero Uno of AHM, the DataBasix War Machine"
<specia...@hell-flame-wars.org> wrote:
[snip -- adds to my claim of a flamewar with DB6 posters, but it's long
and cumbersome. Here's the message ID:
news:3b06ee0d$0$41613$45be...@newscene.com , in case you want to see it
for yourself]
***********
He has a databasix message ID. In your reply tag. Hmmmm.......
Now add to it, this little tidbit taken from this very thread.
**************
> People I've been in flame wars with, other than RB and Rocky:
> 1. Romath-win
> 2. Zazlee-win
> 3. David Sterling-win
> 4. Gary Burnore-win
> 5. Belinda Burnore-win
> 6. spooge-win (though contested)
> 7. MnD and others in alt.swingers-win
> 8. Some kooks in the Jerry Ryan group (accompanied by SharonB)-win
> 9. Affinity-tie
> 10. little toad-win
****************
#10. Little Toad, a databasix poster, which by your own admission, you
had a flamewar with. Hmmm......
As I said, won't dance for you, isn't the same as can't produce
evidence.
You can rescind your claims of spank now.
Spank for that too.
>
> Who else?
>
N/A
>
> >> >That makes sense, because it sure as hell isn't because you do anything
> >> >UPA related.
> >> >
> >> That's a matter of opinion, isn't it?
> >>
> >
> >UPA covers a lot of ground, or none at all, given someone's opinion. But
> >that's okay, since a person knows what UPA is/isn't when they see it. I
> >haven't seen it from you, however. My opinion, of course.
> >
> <sigh> That's what I said.
Then you have been posting UPA, when you said you weren't a Usenet
performance artist?
SPanK for that too.
>
> >> >> and that is incompatible with UPA in what way?
> >> >
> >> >Infinity
> >> >Bonk
> >> [repeat 4 times]
> >> >
> >> Is that supposed to be UPA? Could someone with experience in UPA explain
> >> it to me?
> >
> >If you don't know, how can you tell what is or what isn't UPA when you
> >see it? Which is it jet? Is it is, or is it ain't? After all, you've
> >been around since UPA started, and you can tell just like that *snap*
> >what is and what isn't UPA. Either way, why would you need an opinion
> >from someone with a UPA background?
> >
> That doesn't answer the question.
Oh yes it does. You just don't want to see it.
>I'll state that it could be some form
> of the New UPA (that stuff I've been arguing about), if it will make you
> happy. It may have some earth-shaking meaning to you.
Why won't you answer my questions jet, hmmm? Why are you evading so?
>
> >I'm waiting....taptaptap
> >
Still waiting....taptaptap
> I have no idea what it was, other than bandwidth wasting lines.
I do. And so does anyone who can read.
>Neither
> do you, apparently, despite your ability to recognize whether I've ever
> posted any UPA.
>
> It's called a stand-off but, I asked first. Answer the question.
I did, and apparently so well, that you have no answer to it other than
to claim you don't understand. Miiiiiiighty interesting for someone who
claims to be there from the beginning, and "knows what it's all about.
spank.
>
> >> >> >Lately, no. I've just been hanging out, and I don't do cascades a whole
> >> >> >lot, but I have done it. Some of it worked, some of it bombed, but hey,
> >> >> >at least I've done it,
> >> >> >
> >> >> Who hasn't?
> >> >
> >> >You.
> >> >
> >> I've participated in cascades.
> >
> >And cascades and flaming are what UPA are all about, right? Maybe you
> >need more opinion from UPA artists?
> >
> Um, you said you don't do cascades a lot, but you have done it. I said
> "who hasn't"? You said "you".
Cascades are a part of, but not the totality of UPA. Okay, what else
have you done besides cascades. Flaming? Well, you try to claim that,
but by your own admission, it's just pissing and moaning about what
other people write.
Trolling? Just who exactly got played short bus rider? Here's a hint.
You.
>I've participated in cascades. You're
> reading things into a very simple exchange that aren't there. If you
> keep putting words in my mouth, I'm going to consider this thread a
> total win for me, since you can't even deal with the reality of what's
> said.
Why would I put words in your mouth? You're doing a real good job of
fucking yourself over for me.
>
> [trippy explains a lot of shit I never asked about and makes the Kate-ish
> allegation that I've asked others for help in this thread (apparently
> think a mocking request for an experienced UPAer is asking for help)]
Look familiar, Jet?
**************
my opinion.
The infinity bonk reference:
****************
Oh, and to completely disprove your claim, here's the example of the
bleating for help.
***************
> >> Is that supposed to be UPA? Could someone with experience in UPA explain
> >> it to me?
**************
Might this be a plea for help? Either it's a plea for someone to come
rescue you, or a plea for someone to come in and tell you what it means.
Either way, I win.
Not the same thing as providing a lot of info you didn't ask for.
spank for the dishonest snip summary.
>
> >> Sentence synopsis:
> >> 1. I'm good at playing
> >> 2. You haven't proven it, but keep trying
> >> 3. It's a sad person who thinks play is graded (ref: proof must be
> >> provided)
> >>
> >> Please point out the lack of logic here:
> >
> >The fact that you think you're good at flaming.
> >
> Playing != flaming, though some think I'm good at it.
Too bad that the ones that can flame know better.
>Another thing that's
> based on opinion. Personally, I don't think things like repeating "I'm
> living in j00r head rent free", "I made you answer, so u r owned",
> "u r taking this to serious" and "HAHA I made j00 dance" are anything to
> write home about, but they seem to be popular with your crowd.
>
> >I told you to prove it, which you could have by actually coming up with
> >a good flame, and you just haven't.
> >You really don't want a grade from me.
> >
> Since 90% of what I've said has gone completely over your head, you
> wouldn't have any idea whether I was flaming you or not.
Oh, I think I've demonstrated very well, my attention level.
Given that you
> think Dana can flame, you aren't qualified to grade me.
That so? Hmmmmmm, I'll worry about it later.
> >
> >> >> YM Dana, known as the lamest, noisiest babbling sock on usenet and Mis "I
> >> >> hate flaming" creant?
> >> >
> >> >Funny how nobody's backing you up on that. Go figure.
> >> >
> >> Other than dvus, tm, Meat-->Plow and a couple of Flonkers, ym (re: Dana)?
> >
> >In this thread? No.
> >In the flonk that I can see? No.
> >
> You [conveniently] miss a lot, don't you?
>
> >> Mis is the one who said she hates flaming.
> >
> >Yeah, and I find it hilarious that you tried to bait her at all,
> >considering your long standing on usenet. Like I've already said, for
> >someone who's been around as long as you claim, you sure as hell don't
> >grasp a lot.
> >
> I haven't tried to bait her, at all.
How many more points do I need? No, seriously, how many more points do I
need before you quit making stupid statements like this? How many points
do I need before you just give it up? I want to go. Flaming you like
this isn't even funny. Okay, I'm laughing, well, I did for a while.Now,
it's just ridiculous.
>I don't address her or reply to
> her and she's been back in my killfile for weeks. She was only let out,
> at all, because she was a friend of Rocky and Dean.
Would you like me to go to google again? I can.
>
> OTOH, for someone who hates flaming, she sure attempts to do a lot of
> it.
>
Define a lot.
> >> I doubt many people think spooge kicked anything, but I'm sure he has his
> >> own audience supporting him.
> >
> >I see more supporting him on a regular basis than you. What does that
> >tell you?
> >
> That you're delusional.
Projection or IKYABWAI? You pick.
>
> >> Dowap has never won a flame war with anyone.
> >
> >BWAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAAA !!!!
> >
> >Yeeeeeah, I've seen him destroy you on his own for myself. God, you must
> >not think that people read usenet too often or that they can remember
> >what they read.
> >
> You -are- delusional.
You know what I'm gonna say. Just pick one.
>
> >> Meat-->Plow and I haven't had a flame war, as such, and he apologised for
> >> the 2 completely out of line things he said a year ago. Dana calling me a
> >> crack whore and claiming he wins because he made me *not* reply, is not
> >> kicking my head, I assure you. In fact his stream of posts about me, after
> >> I stopped replying to him, shows he's lost it.
> >
> >Well, he got you to respond again real quick, didn't he, owned one?
> >
> Um, no.
>
Could you tell me again, how many more points do I need before you give
up?
I haven't replied to him since I told him I wasn't going to
> (nearly a week ago).
Wow, a whole week. Good for you !!!
>
>
> >> [I -did- spank you. Didtoodidtoodidtoo.]
> >[Sad, sad, jet. Getting torched by me is NOT winning, hth]
> >
> You're responding to the snippage indicators again. I was summarizing
> what -you- said, dolt.
Then at least try to be objective and give an accurate summary. Oh,
wait, then it wouldn't be a dishonest post edit, and I've already
demonstrated how you like to do those.
>
> >> >> >you're gonna do what you always do, flame out, then lay low, then crawl
> >> >> >out of the woodwork when it doesn't sting so bad, or when Hannigan
> >> >> >decides to show his fat fucking face again, whichever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Eh? This one I'm going to insist you post proof of. You don't even have
> >> >> to prove "always". Once or twice will do.
> >> >
> >> >Why would I need google, when I have the power of observation? You want
> >> >to go google shit so bad, go ahead. You'll prove me right sooner or
> >> >later anyway. Probably sooner.
> >> >
> >> Spank.
> >>
> >
> >Hardly. I've seen it for myself, and I don't need to jump when you say
> >jump. You want to see your own crap so bad, you go and look it up. I've
> >observed YOU, and I know what you're gonna do, and it's gonna play out
> >pretty much how I've said. Yeah, I can go to google and drag up posts,
> >but in reality, I like the fact that I've called it, and you're going to
> >prove me exactly right.
> >
> Still unable to provide a single example. Spank.
Well, hate to tell you this, no, I take that back. I'm gonna like
telling you this, you vapid little thing you. I've proven you're gonna
flame out. How much longer can it be before you give up an lay low? It
can't be much longer. After you've taken off to lay low, you'll have one
of two options: 1) Come back and start posting again, which would mean
the sting is gone or 2) Leave usenet forever. I don't care which, wither
way I win.
Spank resulting from yet another ridiculous spank claim by you.
>
> Pleasepleaseplease, provide *one* example of me laying low, after being
> flamed. Just one. Pwetty pwease.
>
Spooge already did it for me. Thanks Spooge, for the assist.
Can I go now? You're ridiculous.
> <snicker>
>
> >> [...]
> >> >...slut.
> >
> >Niiiiice selective snipping. Let's show the kids at home the part
> >snipped, shall we?
> >
> >********
> >
> >> No, a pseudo-bot is someone whose posts are frequently mistaken for bot
> >> spew. Volume doesn't win a flame war, boy.
> >>
> >
> >Neither does acting like a total dipshit, slut.
> >
> >**********
> >
> >Not quite the paragon of virtue you made yourself out to be. Are you?
> >
> Since I never made out that I was a paragon of virtue (PPOR), I couldn't
> be, could I.
No, you sure didn't. And you sure as hell proved you weren't anyway.
>
> I think, given your bizarre behavior in attributing imaginary statements
> or implications to me, it's almost time for me to declare total spank.
>
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!
You go riiiiiiiight ahead.
> >> >> [you did -too- say you -were- going to burn down ap-fr]
> >> >
> >> >I did? Really? When?
> >> >
> >> That's the part of your response that I snipped. It's a traditional
> >> usenet use of bracketed comments.
> >
> >When you're not busy post editing with them.
> >
> You don't know what post editing, selective snipping or summarizing
> are, either. Arguing with such extreme ignorance is getting wearing.
>
Yeah, don't I know it.
Can I go now? You're are soooooo not good at this.
> >> >> >> Yeah, I know. You're the one who said I've been carrying on a war with
> >> >> >> DB6 and petitmorte for years. That was all the info I needed to know
> >> >> >> you're clueless.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Go to google(the posts search) and type in Jet Spooge Dowap Meat->Plow.
> >> >> >I don't even need to do it and I can see hundreds of posts. Naw, you
> >> >> >
> >> >> How many did I make?
> >> >
> >> >Enough.
> >> >
> >> Spank.
> >>
> >
> >1800 posts under your name (author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net)
> >alone. That's enough in my book. 270 are due to typing in
> >spo...@petitmorte.net after your reply addy.
> >
> 356 of spo...@petitmorte.net's 9040 posts include my address. Does
> that mean he's at war with ogoense.net?
>
I know he has been at war with you and Rebecca, so it wouldn't surprise
me.
> How many of mine are prior to March 2001? You said "years" honey.
Even still, I'd only have drop the s.
Yeah, this doesn't really matter. I buried you, can I go now?
>Prove it
> or STFU.
Yeah, I did that. Look up. Oh, I also said DB6/Petitmorte posters, not
just spooge.
>Then show how many (even the ones to spooge) have anything to do
> with databasix or petitmorte.
Why? I typed in a name, a DB6/Petitmorte poster, and those are the
results. I said hundreds of posts based on the names.
Can I go now? This is just sad.
You don't understand the principles of proof
> any more than anything else, it seems.
>
> >Oh, there's a spank, but not on me.
> >
> >Who wants to bet that Jet drops the thread right here?
> >
> No chance, since I just showed how clueless you are.
>
That's nice. Can I go now? I really just want to take my total
scoreboard of you and go. I won't even do the victory dance, I promise.
> >> >> >don't have a flamewar going with them, really. Any silence is just a
> >> >> >lull until it starts up again.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Find one before about March of last year.
> >> >>
> >> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte prior
> >> to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for "years".
> >>
> You're still avoiding this. Why don't you answer it?
I told you Jet, I don't dance for you. When I feel like it, I will. I'd
really rather just go though. You aren't good at this, and you're boring
the shit out of me.
>
> >> >> [Dana, Misc and Greg making a fool of me. *Snarf*]
> >> >
> >> >Earth to Jet.....Come in Jet......Earth to Jet......Helloooooooooo......
> >> >
> >> It's [snipped] material.
> >
> >And it's still a ridiculous statement.
> >
> Jesus, how many times do I have to explain it's a summary of what *you*
> were saying, that I snipped, you dullard?
Yeah, I've already proven that you can't do it honestly. Can I go now?
You suck at flaming, and I have better things to do.
>I think it's ridiculous too,
> but *you* were the one who said it.
>
> >> >> >> Explain. I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
> >> >> >> and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill. G'head,
> >> >> >> I'll wait...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Unlike you, I don't need to snivel.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Evasion. Try again.
> >> >
> >> >Psst.......try looking below this line.
> >> >
> >> >> >As for the crossposting, I said you could do it. I merely asked why
> >> >> >would you? It served no purpose other to drag people in it who have
> >> >
> >> >Now that wasn't so hard, was it?
> >> >
> >> Try again: I'd like to know how you, Greg and Dana sniveling about where
> >> and when I crosspost is me making a mountain out of a molehill.
> >>
> >
> >Oh, how do you "old timers" say it? *whoosh*?
> >
> IOW, you can't answer the question, so you evade with something unrelated.
> Spank.
Okay, don't try to pretend you can read with comprehension. I've had to
tell you twice to look at a statement that's as spelled out for you as I
can make it.
Can I go now? You can't even fucking read.
>
> >> [...]
> >> >> BTW, it didn't drag a single person from any support group into it.
> >> >> They know how to ignore.
> >> >
> >> >Oh, is that what happened? You only chilled out because they didn't want
> >> >to be a part of it? That should tell you something.
> >> >
> >> Where does it say that's why I "chilled"?
> >
> >No walking brain-death, I'm saying that's why you "chilled".
> >
> How do you know that, since none replied and I backed away from doing it
> about an hour after I started?
It's my opinion.
Can I go now? You can't even tell the difference between fact and
opinon.
>Remember saying that you tried to talk me
> out of it but I had already stopped?
To be honest, I don't care why you stopped. That's how badly I've gotten
scoreboard over you jet, I don't even care. Can I go now?
Talk about brain dead. You're just
> drifting all over the map, making things up and contradicting things you
> said before. What a loser.
>
Riiiiiight. Considering how badly I rolled you, you won't mind when I
don't take you seriously, like ever again. Can I go now?
> >> >> >better things to do, like recover, just so you could lose badly to
> >> >> >spooge anyway.
> >> >> >
> >> >> According to whom?
> >> >
> >> >Anyone who can see the threads?
> >> >
> >> ----------list--------------
> >
> >A-N-Y-B-O-D-Y W-H-O C-A-N S-E-E T-H-E T-H-R-E-A-D-S.
> >
> >It really shouldn't be that hard to comprehend.
> >
> Since you're speaking for everyone, name someone unbiased and unprejudiced
> who thinks I've lost badly to spooge.
Where does it say anywhere, that I was speaking for anybody? Like I
said, you can't fucking read. Can I go now?
>
> >> [yet another in a long line of ikyabwai]
> >> >> >just don't rate that kind of attention. Now, dry those tears, buck up,
> >> >> >and throw yet another text base temper tantrum because someone else with
> >> >> >a stronger grasp of logic than you, has punked you out.
> >> >> >
> >> >> *looks around*
> >> >>
> >> >> Surely you aren't referring to yourself?
> >> >
> >> >Is there another poster named trippy destroying you in this thread?
> >> >
> >> There isn't even one.
> >
> >More of that mental white out, or are you just sniffing white out?
> >
> >>
> >> >> >> >Whatever.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Don't sulk. You're making a lot of stupid mistakes, but I'm still being
> >> >> >> fairly polite.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Shit, I don't need to sulk.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Awww. Coochie coo.
> >> >
> >> >Can you at least try and pretend that you can follow a thread?
> >> >
> >> *whoosh in a PKBish manner*
> >
> >Well, you couldn't follow the thread, posting yet another one of those
> >non-sequiter thangs that you hate so much. Of course I'm gonna ask if
> >you can follow the thread.
> >
> It wasn't a non-sequitur.
I hate to do this, but I just can't resist. Back to the crack-ho one
more time.
You don't know what words mean, do you?
It's worth the heat.
>It was a logical transition that went:
> (me proving you were wrong about something)
> trippy (sulking): whatever.
> jet: don't sulk.
> trippy (still sulking but defiant): I don't need to sulk.
> jet: Aww. Coochie coo. (what one says to a sulky baby).
>
> [trippy DKWWM and insists fear = hysteria]
>
I've alredy shown that you try to post edit through snipping. I've also
already shown that you don't accurately describe what you snip.
Can I go now? We've been through this already.
Apparently not. Is there more to this or can I go now?
> > or the fact that any silence between you and DB6/petitmorte
> >posters is just a lull unil you go off half-cocked again? Oh, nice
> >
> Do you consider Wotan, Kevin Cannon, spooge, Gary and Cujo coming out of
> nowhere, to jump into conversations I was having with someone else
> (unrelated to PM or DB6) and accuse me of things I didn't do, to be -me-
> going off half-cocked? I need to know, before you claim victory.
I'm not going to argue half cocked with you. Can I go now?
>
> >convient snip there too. You're just a snippin' fiend, aintcha? Next
> >
> Yup.
>
> >time you can either take the section out or leave it in entirely.
> >
> or what?
>
Or you'll look stupid for doing it. Again.
> Notice
> >that I haven't felt the need to post edit you, so now given that, you
> >tell me who's winning.
> >
> I haven't post edited. Learn what the terms you use mean.
I've proven you do. No matter how many times you do it, you still look
bad doing it.
If you keep doing the same stupid shit and keep expecting better
results, how CAN I take you seriously.
>It shouldn't
> be too hard since a half dozen of us have already pointed out the same
> stupid mistake to Kate. Just read those posts, imbecile.
>
> >Like I said time will tell all.
> >
> >>
> >> [You -did- say you friends were going to attack. *sob*]
> >
> >You did, with the accompanying backpedal from you. I know it hurts, but
> >you really need to get over it.
> >
> Even you aren't -that- stupid.
Yeah, can I go? We've been over this repeatedly already, and I've proven
you wrong. It's all just overkill at this point, and not a lot of fun.
>You'd have to have the brain of a 5 year
> old to think I said any such thing. You really are making a ludicrous
> spectacle of yourself, with your insistance.
>
Right. Thanks for that insightful analysis from the viewpoint of bent
over with a red ass. No matter how haughty you try and make it sound,
bluster isn't gonna do it for you.
> [after a stunning barrage of IKYAs, PKBs, and claims of victory, trippy
> says...]
> >> >I just said bring your buddies and come "educate" me.
> >> >
> >> Why would I do that?
> >
> >Because you said you were going to?
> >
> >> That's what *Dana* is going to do (and go round and
> >> round and round in the circle game).
> >
> >Ooooooooh, so now he's telling you his plans, is he? I seeee.
> >
> He posted that it was his intention. Another example that you have no
> idea what you got yourself into.
Yeeeeeeeah. Fine, he said he was gonna burn groups to the ground. I
don't care. Can I go now?
>
> >> [defensive posturing about masturbation.]
> >
> >BWAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAAA !!!!!!
> >
> >Let's look at the portion snipped, since jet's as good at summarizing as
> >she is with flaming.
> >***********
> >> If that's the
> >> reason you started masturbaiting over this thread, you've wasted time and
> >> a perfectly good wank.
> >
> >I just said bring your buddies and come "educate" me. There wasn't
> >masturbation involved. I prefer live women instead of text based
> >messages to fulfill my sexual needs.
> >
> >*********************
> >
> The last sentence is defensive posturing.
"Jet you ignorant slut" (Thank you Dan Ackroyd)
>If you can't make a valid point,
> don't unecessarily add to the line count.
It's not gonna be a problem for much longer.
I picked this post up but I'm
> not going to answer posts that exceed 1000 lines, for no reason.
>
> >You made my point for me. Again.
> >
> >Just give it up Jet, you aren't good at this.
> >
> I'm excellent at this. :)
In that completely non-clueless special olympian way, right.
>I really hadn't realized, until this thread,
> that you aren't very bright. I previously thought you were clever, almost
> as amusing and creative as mimus. I'm amazed that I missed your lack
> of wit.
Fine, you don't think I'm witty, or clever. I don't care. I mean this in
all sincerity. I have found you to be *completely* ridiculous, and
*completely* beneath me. I have nothing but contempt for you. I can
never respect you, and I know that you'll never be my equal, much less
my superior.
>
> You really think you're winning, don't you? That's funny.
It truly is. Can I go now?
I was just
> thinking that you've reached the point where nothing you say is relevent
> and how I don't even need to pay attention, anymore.
Yeah, you've proven you don't pay attention. Can I go now?
Everything you say
> is padding, because you believe you win a flame war by being the last
> person standing, even if you look like a bleeding clown and your argument
> is shattered.
>
Sure shooter, whatever you say.
> You're such a generic, cardboard cut-out flamer that, without checking,
> I couldn't tell your from any number of lusers. A couple times I've had
> problems remembering who you are.
>
I'd say plonk, but I may flame you again. Suffice to say, this thread
should be over, and if you don't want to be humiliated so badly by me,
you won't respond. I may or may not answer you depending on what I feel
like. I'd just like to end this post by reinforcing what I said. I have
no respect for you whatsover, and I doubt I will again. You will *never*
be my equal, and you will *never, ever* be my superior. Now, I'm gonaa
take my *total* scoreboard on you, and be on my way.
jet
evasive tangents
In article <MPG.1720552cd...@news.alt.net>, trippy
<tri...@spam.sucks> wrote:
>This dude, "jet" morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net, in message
><a93jg0$d01$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>, said the following tripped out
>things....
[...]
>When you make statements in them, using your lack of ability to
>comprehehend reality, yeah, they'll get a response. You aren't snipping
>for space, you're trying to make these insipid little points which don't
>reflect AT ALL what was actually said.
>
>That's pretty weak jet, even for you.
>
Incorrect. What I put in the brackets refelects what you said.
>Like calling you out on dishonest snipping? I know I've been doing that.
>
Incorrect. I haven't done any "dishonest snipping". I snip what I don't
intend to answer or what's already been covered and I document the snips.
>> >Lame trolls haven't educated me at all, maybe that's why I actually
>> >*win* flamewars.
>> >
>> I've never seen you do so. PPOR.
>
>You won't have to look any farther than this thread.
>
In your dreams. You've evaded every single issue in the thread and
tried to bluster to cover it up.
>> [trippy gets involved because he can't tell a question from a statement
>> of intent.]
>
>Still trying to deny your backpedal I see. It figures. Jet, you gotta
>get over it. I called you out, and you backed down. That's probabbly the
>reason you still keep replying, since you just can't handle that. You
>gonna turn into some obsessed fangurl now? Oh wait, I already know the
>answer to that one.
>
Incorrect. You're trying to turn a question that was appropriate to the
discussion into a threat. You're quite simply an ignorant slug, who's
terrified he'll look like a wimp if he backs down.
>Yes Jet, there's real life people behind the keyboards.
>
Thank you for your admission that usenet is connected to real life
(which was all I said).
I wouldn't even
>begin to claim I know them all though. I wouldn't claim that all of
>those real life people know me, or that they think of me outside of
>usenet. I'm sure that most of these real life people behind the
>keyboards don't even think about me, when they shut down their
>newsreader. To most people, I'm just another name for the From line. Now
>I will say that I know people I've met from usenet, and have formed
>genuine friendships with them. I've told them about my life, and have
>been honest with them, and have no reason to think they haven't done the
>same. The number of genuine friendships I've made though is a small
>proportion of the number of real life people sitting behind keyboards
>though.
>
>I don't expect you to understand,
>
I understand completely. You're throwing in a bunch of totally irrelevent
babble to cover up that you're wrong. Usenet connects to RL. Proved by me,
acknowledged by you. I didn't say a single word about "knowing" anyone
or being friends with them, so stop padding.
[blahblahblah]
>cares at all, besides you and me. So yes, Jet, there's real life people
>behind the keyboards, and they're doing other shit. You don't have an
>"audience", and I don't have an "audience".
>
Everyone who has a single person read their post has an audience. Period.
Look up the word. You won't find -anything- in the definition about
whether you're friends with people on usenet or know them.
>> What does that have to do with most nanap regs thinking Dana is a moron?
>
>Most of the buttlicks in nanap think everyone's a moron. nanap,
>while sometimes serving an actual purpose is a magnet for every self-
>important doofus that thinks that his/her opinion matters to an internet
>community that doesn't even care about usenet. Oh, sure, there's some
>good ones in nanap, there usually is one or two in every nana* gorup,
>but for the most part it's chock full of bootlickers and apple
>polishers, you being one of them.
>
Completely irrelevent to whether Dana is considered a moron. Proof that
your statement about me being a bootlicker is false is available from the
people involved in the last big Meower/Admin discussion in nanap. I can
point you to the threads, if you like.
>And displayed a stunning lack of comprehension doing it. Maybe you need
>a remedial english class or hooked on phonics or something.
>
I have no problem understanding a simple phrase like "not because it
hurts rocky but...", particularly when I wrote it. Which part of that
are you having such difficulty with that you have to write several
paragraphs telling me (incorrectly) what I wrote?
>So what? If it wasn't that thread, some other thread would be. The one
>
Irrelevent to my statement that being the highest volume thread, it
was likely to get comments.
[snip Trippy's tangent about god knows what, since whether I think a
thread is too long or has too many posts has -nothing- to do with my
point that high volume threads are more likely than not to receive
responses.}
>> How does it
>> not being disruptive have anything to do with whether anyone comments
>> on it?
>
>Well, nothing,
>
Than why did you say it?
[snip more babbling about people in the flonk or whatever being used to
long threads and mention of me being unintelligent and "fragile" which
-still- have nothing to do with my point that high volume threads are
likely to have responses and comments from others]
>> >Did Rocky go postal on usenet? Did Miscreant? Then it really doesn't
>> >apply, does it?
>> >
>> Misc (I hate flaming) decided to start flaming Rocky for his posts so,
>> yes, it does apply but, that isn't what I said or implied.
[snip a bunch about me being torched in flame wars, etc, which has nothing
to do with whether Mis criticising Rocky's posting style was similar to
Kate criticising Steve]
>
>> The Greg/Misc
>> thread was a high volume, personal thread between 2 people, as was the
>> Kate/OpI one.
>
[snip trippy's reasons for responding to Kate, which have nothing to...
etc]
>> The more high volume a thread is, the more likely it is to
>> be eventually commented on, whether it's disruptive or not.
>>
Ah, here's the statement, again, that lead to trippy posting many
paragraphs that were unrelated to the statement and had no point
whatsoever.
>> >Since you're clue impaired here's the answer:
>> >
>> >No.
>> >
>> Wrong again.
>
>What? No brackets that say you snipped? Why, that would be a dishonest
>post edit, wouldn't it? That's pretty dishonest for someone who should
>know the rules since she's been there "from the beginning".
>
I didn't snip anything from those 5 lines. The last 3 are what you wrote.
>> >> >Oh, it did. It helped me see what a fucking freak you are.
>> >> >
>> >> How's that?
>> >
>> >It showed that you took Rocky and Mis's breakup harder than they did?
>> >
>> Um, I was delighted that they broke up, dimwit.
>
>Did you cheer? Did you hold a party? It wouldn't surprise me,
>considering how usenet is real life to you.
>
Nice backpedal and contradiction of your statement 4 lines up that I took
the break-up harder than they did.
>> Rocky can do and has done
>> much better than Mis.
>
>You should spread wider, England's far away.
>
Maybe that's why Mis decided to spread for someone closer to home.
(you set them up and I'll answer them, sweetheart)
[snip a bunch of stuff that shows trippy still doesn't understand what
vapid means]
>People who burn people once their relationship ends are vapid. What's so
>hard about comprehending the context of that? You aren't real smart, are
>you?
>
The fact that you don't know what vapid means. You chose the wrong word.
Just accept it and move on, before you look even more foolish.
[snip stuff about my supposedly damaged brain]
[snip denial of being spanked for evading requests to support his
arguments]
[snip attempts at flaming that are irrelevent to the subject]
[...]
>> >> So what is -your- opposing definition of flaming?
>> >
>> >Here's a hint: Pissing and moaning have nothing to do with it.
>> >
>> That isn't a definition.
>
>And? What? Are you gonna whine for more free clues? It won't do you much
>good, but it'll be fun to watch.
>
Spank. If you can't provide an alternative definition, there's no evidence
that my definition is wrong. Pointing out that you keep running from your
own words and try to hide behind particularly lame flames isn't whining.
>I speak English, with coherent thought patterns. You speak english
>without coherent thought patterns. Therein lies all the difference.
>
You can't comprehending something doesn't make it incoherent, you
simple-minded dolt.
>> Now, what is your dissenting definition of flaming?
>
>Like I said before, no free clues for you. If you don't get it, then you
>have no business flaming.
>
Another evasion. That makes 5 or 6 now. I think it's safe to conclude you
can't define flaming.
[snip trippy refusing to back up his statements again]
>> Google provides facts, which you keep evading, spankard.
>
>No, Google archives posts, and directs people to webpages. I guess
>that's why they bill themselves as a search engine with a full usenet
>archive, not as a distributor of facts.
>
Google distributes posts which are factual and accurate copies of posts.
[trippy claims his statements, which he refuses to support, about spooge
always beating me in flame wars and about me "laying low" until I have
the "nads" to face spooge again are true, but -still- doesn't provide
-any- evidence]
>You can retract your quite questionable spank claim now.
>
>You're welcome.
>
You're completely spanked, or you'd be able to support at -least- one
of your statements, instead of waffling around about things that have
nothing to do with them.
>What part of "Not all those 800 lines are all mine" didn't you
>
I don't give a shit how many line you personally wrote. You wrote
the majority of them. It doesn't take any more time to write explanations
of your statements than it takes to write your attempts to evade
answering them.
>understand? I know you're hurting for clues and everything, but really,
>if you don't know, you should just ask. You won't get any help from me,
>because it's not to my advantage to help you. See, jet, we're in a
>flamewar. I don't have to do ANYTHING until I choose to, and in fact
>
You missed the boat, trip.
>that's exactly what's gonna happen. So, you can sit there and cry spank
>as many times as you want, and in fact, please do. It just makes you
>look all the more stupid when you realize how horribly you've been
>played.
>
"I wuz trolling. Really." I'd say that makes my total spank of trippy
complete, but I'm sure there will be more.
>>All these reply cycles and you still don't have time to explain
>> your own ridiculous conclusions or allegations, and dodge when asked to.
>
>I've dodged nothing. I will pick the times of the things I reveal. Not
>you.
>
You're too late sweetie pie. You were called and you refused to show
your cards. You lose.
[snip huge blocks of prose where trippy says he doesn't have to back up
his words]
>> >> >> I've heard the battle cry of the War Geese and dreamed of them flying
>> >> >> south in winter.
>> >> >
>> >> >Uh........you coming back to earth anytime soon?
>> >> >
>> >> A Flonker would have understood.
>> >
>> >So because you throw out a non-sequiter, which by the way you said you
>> >hate, that makes you a flonker?
>> >
>> >Ooooooookay.
>> >
>> It wasn't, in any way, a non-sequitur.
>
>When you post a sentence that doesn't connect to the previous one, that
>would be a non-sequiter, regardless if it's a flonk reference or not. Do
>you not know what non-sequiter means?
>
Yes and it connected to the previous sentence. You said I wasn't much
of a flonker. I posted reference that was evidence I am a flonker.
[babble]
>Based on your assertion that there's 2 posters posting from databasix?
>
That assertion was never made, making you a liar as well as stupid.
>>What does that have to do with me not being aware of any posters
>> from Databasix, in -any- of those groups, other than spooge or RussellB.
>> Respond to what's written, please.
>Or say, little toad, who uses databasix, who's also whupped your ass a
>time or two.
>
Little toad posts from alt.net.
>> >> If there are more, they're either killfiled or I just don't
>> >> read them. I have no idea how many posters DB6 has and people can't post
>> >> from petitmorte.
>> >> -------start list of other db6 posters here-----------
>> >
>> >If you can't figure that out, why the hell should I tell you, since it
>> >works to my advantage NOT to? Answer me that, then maybe you'll get
>> >these inane lists you so desperately crave. Of course, if you could fill
>> >in the blanks in the first place, you wouldn't be in the situation
>> >you're in now.
>> >
>> Spank. Unable to provide names of other DB6 posters.
>
>Little Toad.
>
Posts from alt.net.
>Now you know why I waited. Here's yet another hint slut, I don't bluff.
>Ever.
>
>Here's yet another hint. "Won't dance for you" doesn't meant the same as
>"Can't produce evidence".
>
Apparently it does, since you just fell on your ass.
>Care to make yet another baseless spank claim? You probably will.
>
Spank.
>> >> Obviously, I didn't come "here" to flame DB6ers, if I was "here" before
>> >> they were.
>> >
>> >Interesting claim, since google has
>> >author:morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net archived only through early 2002.
>> >and alt.fan.jet since 1999, in which before the year 2000, no posts
>> >showed up under "jet" period. So obviously, you used another name, or
>> >another reply addy, without either of which, nothing can be proven.
>> >Conviennt, that.
>> >
>> I didn't archive.
>
>Also convienent, but a lot of people do that, so I'd have to connect you
>to flame threads somehow, and to be honest, I can torch you with what I
>have now.
>
Can you? I'll look forward to seeing you torch me with proof that I
came to any group to pick a fight with databasix users.
[...]
>> About coming here to pick fights with databasix users? I had an account
>> at databasix and was on good terms with users other than spooge from Nov,
>> 2000 to April 2001.
>
>Don't you mean user? After all, you said you only knew of one other
>Databasix users other than Russell B.
>
Liar. I said I was only aware of 2 databasix posters posting here.
Spank.
[snip bullshit]
>>How could I be at war with them prior to that? I can
>> provide references who will say I was posting to UPA and Meower groups
>> before I got the databasix account. Want the names?
>
>Sure, if you wanna give them and give me more ammo.
>
Pat Burke. Soque Puppette. Cu. Lunch Lady. Sharon Burton. Jules. Gary
Burnore. Belinda Burnore. Raoul X. IRS Agent. Mike Egan. Flaagg. Doctor
Pete. Taku Moero. Claybreaker. All the regs from acadia.chat. Most of
the regs from the Jiffy Club. Anyone who remembers the end of the Asatru
war.
Pat Burke helped me get the DB6 account. Need more?
[a bunch of garbled stuff that say supposedly proves I was at war with
databasix for years, despite the fact that little toad posts from alt.net
and that the other post he mentioned was about me defending Rebecca and
not about any war on databasix. On the contrary it was about the databasix
war on Rebecca.]
>#10. Little Toad, a databasix poster, which by your own admission, you
>had a flamewar with. Hmmm......
>
alt.net. <sigh>
>
>As I said, won't dance for you, isn't the same as can't produce
>evidence.
>
>You can rescind your claims of spank now.
>
>Spank for that too.
>
You lose, baby doll.
[...]
>> >UPA covers a lot of ground, or none at all, given someone's opinion. But
>> >that's okay, since a person knows what UPA is/isn't when they see it. I
>> >haven't seen it from you, however. My opinion, of course.
>> >
>> <sigh> That's what I said.
>
>Then you have been posting UPA, when you said you weren't a Usenet
>performance artist?
>
You're really dumb, trippy.
>SPanK for that too.
>
I'm not a usenet performance artist. As I said, whether I've been posting
anything that could be considered performance art is a matter of anyone's
opinion.
[...]
>Why won't you answer my questions jet, hmmm? Why are you evading so?
>
I've answered all your questions. I'm not going to repeat the answers.
>> I have no idea what it was, other than bandwidth wasting lines.
>
>I do. And so does anyone who can read.
>
Really? There are a lot of readers here. What do they think writing
several lines of bonk infinity is?
>I did, and apparently so well, that you have no answer to it other than
>to claim you don't understand. Miiiiiiighty interesting for someone who
>claims to be there from the beginning, and "knows what it's all about.
>
That's what's known as quote faking. Spank again.
[...]
>Cascades are a part of, but not the totality of UPA. Okay, what else
>have you done besides cascades. Flaming? Well, you try to claim that,
>but by your own admission, it's just pissing and moaning about what
>other people write.
>
>Trolling? Just who exactly got played short bus rider? Here's a hint.
>You.
>
Oh my. You waz trolling me. When did simply posting bullshit and lying
become trolling? Oh, I know; when the New UPA showed up. When are you
going to use the tried and true "YHBT cuz I made you answer"?
[snip a bunch of bravado from trippy where he posts a lot of shit that
has nothing to do with anything, posts "proof" that proves nothing, and
declares his victory and superiority over me. Anyone who reads it deserves
the boredom they get. I don't reply once posts exceed 1000 lines.]
If anyone other than trippy, Dana, Greg or Dana's bandwagon thinks that
trippy has utterly humiliated me, or trolled me, let me know so I can be
properly humble and beaten, okay?
I'm so fucking tired of people who keep saying -I- take everything too
seriously, then go on to take everything I say seriously.
trippy
Here you go jet, you may be right, little toad might use alt.net. Before
you get all googly eyed at seeing this, it's only a minor change. just
substitute Terrible Tom for little toad.
Want proof?
Here ya go:
************
From: jet (morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net)
Subject: Re: Jet is Confused and so is Kate: Re: ping: kate
Newsgroups: alt.flame, alt.rock-n-roll.stones, alt.fan.tomsq,
alt.usenet.kooks
View this article only
Date: 2002-02-17 01:52:45 PST
In article <a4o5gd$lpl$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>, "Terrible Tom"
<to...@databasix.com> wrote:
***********
Why you were even cool with him. Now, the books are square.
Buh bye spanky.
trippy
<MPG.17208dc43...@news.alt.net>, said the following tripped
out things....
>
> you get all googly eyed at seeing this, it's only a minor change. just
> substitute Terrible Tom for little toad.
>
> Want proof?
>
> Here ya go:
>
> ************
>
> From: jet (morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net)
> Subject: Re: Jet is Confused and so is Kate: Re: ping: kate
> Newsgroups: alt.flame, alt.rock-n-roll.stones, alt.fan.tomsq,
> alt.usenet.kooks
> View this article only
> Date: 2002-02-17 01:52:45 PST
>
>
> In article <a4o5gd$lpl$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>, "Terrible Tom"
> <to...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
> ***********
>
> Why you were even cool with him. Now, the books are square.
>
> Buh bye spanky.
>
>
>
Before I go, and basically, because I like giving you hope, and crushing
it again, here's the other part that you'll eventually be hollering
about.
Here's your list again of poster you had flame wars with
****************
> People I've been in flame wars with, other than RB and Rocky:
> 1. Romath-win
> 2. Zazlee-win
> 3. David Sterling-win
> 4. Gary Burnore-win
> 5. Belinda Burnore-win
> 6. spooge-win (though contested)
> 7. MnD and others in alt.swingers-win
> 8. Some kooks in the Jerry Ryan group (accompanied by SharonB)-win
> 9. Affinity-tie
> 10. little toad-win
*************
Now here's the name of a databasix poster you had a flame war with by
your own admission.
From: Gary L. Burnore (gbur...@databasix.com)
Subject: Re: E-mail Address Munging Lesson For A Spammer
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
View this article only
Date: 2001-06-30 16:27:50 PST
On 30 Jun 2001 18:19:06 -0500, j...@untool.net (jet) wrote:
******************
Now the books really are square.
Apology for wasting my time accepted.
Oh, yeah, one more thing. I lied about not having the time. Sorry.
See ya, wouldn't want to be ya.
jet
the date, imbecile. That isn't before March of last year, which is when
I -told- you the war started, is it, and it wasn't in here, was it?
>From: Gary L. Burnore (gbur...@databasix.com)
>Subject: Re: E-mail Address Munging Lesson For A Spammer
>Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
>View this article only
>Date: 2001-06-30 16:27:50 PST
>
>
>On 30 Jun 2001 18:19:06 -0500, j...@untool.net (jet) wrote:
>
>******************
>
>Now the books really are square.
>
>Apology for wasting my time accepted.
>
>Oh, yeah, one more thing. I lied about not having the time. Sorry.
>
>See ya, wouldn't want to be ya.
>
Jesus, trippy. After all your bluster, the best you can come up with
for your Big Spank is a person from databasix, who occasionally posts
to the flonk, that I'd forgotten, and that somehow proves your contention
that I've been at war with DB6 for years. Tom got his account after I
left databasix, in April of last year.
You're not only stupid, you're pathetic. This is almost as ridiculous as
spooge claiming his Big Win because I said February instead of March.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a97f5c$232$0...@dosa.alt.net:
> You're not only stupid, you're pathetic. This is almost as ridiculous as
> spooge claiming his Big Win because I said February instead of March.
Fan-Jet, you're the only silly fool I see claiming any "wins". I pointed
out, *again*, that you were full of shit. It may make you look and feel
like a loser, but unlike you, I'm not here to count "wins".
You've fucked up. Again. Google doesn't have any flames between you and I
in March of 2001 either. You fucking mental midget.
According to Google, and my non-mentally impaired memory, the first post I
ever made in your direction was on April 13, 2001:
Message-ID: <9b85f7$o9e$1...@intimidator.databasix.com>
You see, you loon, this is about you, and your lack of familiarity with
something called *the truth*. You'll claim anything, because to you Usenet
is real, and you have to *win*.
You're a sad example of what happens when someone with mental problems gets
too involved in Usenet. Pull the plug, or grab that razor blade, Jet.
You're fucked in the head, dear. Seriously.
Tubby Chubbs
<spo...@petitmorte.net> added to the entropy with:
>bign...@aol.comDean (BigNetBuy) wrote in
>news:20020411013723...@mb-fc.aol.com:
>
>>>> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte
>>>> prior to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for
>>>> "years".
>>>
>>>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>>>
>>>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of
>>>2000. That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of
>>>2001, a little over a year ago."
>>
>> *************
>> Say, didn't you once claim there was no connection between db6 and
>> pedomorte?
>
>More than once, Dave. What does the word "or" mean on your planet?
>
an implement he's lacking while upstream in a small body of water?
--
mhm i x i
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a95hee$ih5$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
> In article <Xns91EDC4B5587...@207.14.113.10>,
> "spo...@petitmorte.net" <spo...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>>news:a93jg0$d01$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
>>
>>> Pleasepleaseplease, provide *one* example of me laying low, after
>>> being flamed. Just one. Pwetty pwease.
>>
>>I'll, be glad to.
>>
>>After I exposed the bullshit contained in:
>>
>>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of
>>2000. That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of
>>2001, a little over a year ago."
>>
>>And proved that we exchanged *zero* posts in February 2001, you
>>decided you'd "ignore" me.
>>
>>That's laying low.
>>
> No that's giving in to multiple requests that I ignotr you, like
> they do. I never left usenet.
I didn't say you had left, I said that you were laying low. Like a snake.
I suspect that you're right now wishing that you'd stayed low, too.
Want to talk about March, 2001? No? Why?
>>HTH, Loon.
>>
>>Say, didn't I see you "flaming" someone for using baby-talk?
>>
> Uh huh. I hate the shit, but it seems to be the only thing some
> people understand.
Riiiiiiiiight. IIRC, you've "flamed" me about using "hacker" phrasing on
the idiot classes in AHM. It's interesting to see that you now buy into
the concept of talking to folks in a tongue that they understand.
Now about your inability to read a calendar...
<affinity>
"Shut up. Go away."
--
__
/\ \
/ \ \
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/______ffinity
spo...@petitmorte.net
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a95ir6$fnc$0...@pita.alt.net:
> In article <Xns91EDC1A5E6D...@207.14.113.10>,
> "spo...@petitmorte.net" <spo...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>>news:a93m4u$9kf$1...@dosa.alt.net:
>>
>>>>candle
>>>>"and people say I lack originality?"
>>>>
>>> They sure do.
>>
>>A sign of the lack of veracity your words have is that you often cite
>>what "others" think/say to support your "flames".
>>
> Greg is the one who said it, nitwit. I was agreeing with him. In
> case you didn't notice, that means you called him a liar.
In <a93m4u$9kf$1...@dosa.alt.net> you said "They sure do". You didn't say "I
agree with you, Greg." Greg is just one person, right? Who is "they"?
Have you recently undergone some heavy duty shock therapy, perchance?
>>Face it, Loon, you haven't the backbone to stand up for your own
>>words, you need to have phantom sympathizers on your side.
>>
>>It must be lonely there in your garage, listening to the dustbunnies
>>cheer you on in your crusade to make parts of Usenet in your own
>>image. It makes perfect sense that you'd rely on those ghostly voices
>>for comfort.
>>
>>You're a sad-sack of shit, Jet.
>>
> Are you ever going to get over this obsession, John? You've been going
> on like this for months, as if it matters to anyone but you. Try
> acting like a man, for a change.
Jet, you've been throwing my nym into a number of your posts the past few
days. I ignored it until you started repeating lies. Don't blame me for
your own actions. Every time I slap you for this shit you pull out this
bullshit "obsess" crap. I'm not the one talking/lying about you to others.
I'll stop showing you up when you truly do learn to ignore me, and stop
saying things that I take exception to. That's fairly simple. Even
someone with the mental difficulties you have should be able to understand.
spo...@petitmorte.net
trippy
You say little toad posted through alt.net, fine. I proved it all
anyway. It wouldn't matter, except for little toad emailing me and
telling me that I was right, she does use databasix (or at least did),
in addition to various chit chat things that people do when they email
each other. Don't bother asking to see it, I'm not going to show you.
You can ask LT about it though, and see what she says. Now all your
spanks are doubled, and you get an extra spank as an added bonus.
It's over. There's no way I can make you look any like any worse than I
already have.
Buh-bye now, you *completely* spanked thing you.
jet
>
>
>
>"Shut up. Go away."
>
He won't. It's getting pretty funny. World famous kook Elaine "Romath"
Matthews has joined the team with Dana, Mis, Trippy, spooge etc. It's
gonna be kook central and lame flames forever.
jet
a couple of completely negligible databasix posters. Kind of like spooge
jumping up and down for weeks, screaming "liar liar liar" because I
forgot I got my databasix account in March not February.
If proving that little toad (who I don't recall ever posting through DB6)
and Tom, (who occasionally posted to the flonk in the last few months)
are very forgettable means you've spanked me, wahoo, you succeeded.
>anyway. It wouldn't matter, except for little toad emailing me and
>telling me that I was right, she does use databasix (or at least did),
>
She didn't have a databasix account until after I lost mine, loon. You
see, what you can't seem to get through your head is that, if I'd
been at war with databasix prior to March of last year, they wouldn't
have given me an account.
>in addition to various chit chat things that people do when they email
>each other. Don't bother asking to see it, I'm not going to show you.
>You can ask LT about it though, and see what she says. Now all your
>
Why would I ask lt anything? Do you have some notion that someone who's
a well known email backstabber's opinion matters?
>It's over. There's no way I can make you look any like any worse than I
>already have.
>
You haven't made me look bad, at all. In fact, your "proof" proved
everything -I- said.
>Buh-bye now, you *completely* spanked thing you.
>
Don't get your hopes up, but do feel free to "flame out" and "lay low".
You did beg me to let you go, didn't you?
Meat-->Plow
<lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>"Shut up. Go away."
Hey that was clever.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a98n9j$6kq$2...@dosa.alt.net:
[...]
> You literally didn't prove -anything- except that I failed to remember
> a couple of completely negligible databasix posters. Kind of like
> spooge jumping up and down for weeks, screaming "liar liar liar"
> because I forgot I got my databasix account in March not February.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Jet, that isn't what you've been bullshitting about. You
claimed that the two of us were in a heavy flamewar in February, then March
of 2001. The slapping you've been getting is about that, not when you got
your DataBasix account. I couldn't care less when that was.
You keep on posting this kind of bullshit, and I'll keep on waving it in
your face.
I honestly thought you weren't this stupid. Live and learn...
[...]
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a98m4d$6kq$0...@dosa.alt.net:
> In article <3CB7A98F...@bigpond.com>, "<affinity>"
> <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>"Shut up. Go away."
>>
> He won't. It's getting pretty funny. World famous kook Elaine "Romath"
> Matthews has joined the team with Dana, Mis, Trippy, spooge etc. It's
> gonna be kook central and lame flames forever.
Jet, when did it ever matter to me whom else was kicking your ass?
BTW, haven't you and I already discussed just how silly it is for a self-
acknowledged, medically cerified loon like you to try and "flame" others as
being kooks?
And didn't that upset you, you tough old "flamer" you? :)
<affinity>
"Meat-->Plow" wrote:
How would you know?
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
>
>
> "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Shut up. Go away."
>>
>> Hey that was clever.
>
> How would you know?
Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to your usual efforts?
JTTH
<affinity>
"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
>
> >
> >
> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
> >>
> >> Hey that was clever.
> >
> > How would you know?
>
> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
miscreant
alt.penguin-fetish.recovery:
> morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
> news:a98m4d$6kq$0...@dosa.alt.net:
>
>> In article <3CB7A98F...@bigpond.com>, "<affinity>"
>> <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Shut up. Go away."
>>>
>> He won't. It's getting pretty funny. World famous kook Elaine
>> "Romath" Matthews has joined the team with Dana, Mis, Trippy, spooge
>> etc. It's gonna be kook central and lame flames forever.
>
> Jet, when did it ever matter to me whom else was kicking your ass?
>
> BTW, haven't you and I already discussed just how silly it is for a
> self- acknowledged, medically cerified loon like you to try and
> "flame" others as being kooks?
>
> And didn't that upset you, you tough old "flamer" you? :)
>
me and spooge are on the same team? rawk!
hey, um...are we the "shirts" or the "no shirts"?
--
miscreant | mhm 31x15 | ICQ:31337003
evil little witch, #443 of the
order of the bastard penguin army
http://www.geocities.com/msnemesis01
Fleischpflug
<lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>
>
>"Meat-->Plow" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Shut up. Go away."
>>
>> Hey that was clever.
>
>How would you know?
You're really on a roll. Keep it going.
Fleischpflug
<lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>
>
>"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
>
>> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
>> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
>> >>
>> >> Hey that was clever.
>> >
>> > How would you know?
>>
>> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
>
>But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
>
>That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
Do you always post from within your thesaurus to make up for your
minimal intelligence?
miscreant
>>Subject: Re: An example of laying low
>>Path:
>>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fe
>>ed
> 2.news.rcn.net!rcn!news.voicenet.com!yellow.newsread.com!bad-news.newsr
> ead
> .com!netaxs.com!newsread.com!newsfeeds-atl2!atlpnn01.usenetserver.com.P
> OST ED!not-for-mail
>>Newsgroups: alt.hackers.malicious, alt.penguin-fetish.recovery,
>>alt.flame, alt.romath, alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
>>From: miscreant as...@right.here
>>References: <91E7E3F4Ezant...@209.249.90.101>
>><91E9A27ABzant...@209.249.90.101>
>><a8qk1v$piu$4...@dosa.alt.net> <MPG.171aaffaa...@news.alt.net>
>><a8quau$sm8$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><MPG.171ac4618...@news.alt.net>
>><a8r3os$fcp$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><MPG.171ae1caf...@news.alt.net>
>><a8rdpk$f6a$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><MPG.171bf0bf9...@news.alt.net>
>><a8tg7v$imq$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><MPG.171c124e8...@news.alt.net>
>><a8tt28$aoh$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><MPG.171d36fa1...@news.alt.net>
>><a90bfi$s5v$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><MPG.171e70c85...@news.alt.net>
>><a92jd9$626$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><MPG.171ebd1dd...@news.alt.net>
>><a93jg0$d01$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><Xns91EDC4B5587...@207.14.113.10>
>><a95hee$ih5$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>><Xns91EECFE7DA7...@207.14.113.10>
>><3CB7A98F...@bigpond.com> <a98m4d$6kq$0...@dosa.alt.net>
>><Xns91EFA132BD0...@207.14.113.10> Organization: ITU
>>Message-ID: <Xns91F02A35A3DBBm...@64.154.60.171>
>>User-Agent: Xnews/L5
>>X-Approved: Fuck Approval
>>X-Post: Responsibly, please
>>X-Reply-To: misc...@meow.dot.org
>>X-URL: http://www.geocities.com/msnemesis01
>>Lines: 43
>>X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenetserver.com
>>X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
>>X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
>>properly. NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 04:08:07 EDT
>>Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 08:08:07 GMT
>>Xref: lobby alt.hackers.malicious:533442
>>alt.penguin-fetish.recovery:46495 alt.flame:871835 alt.romath:257412
>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:585423
>>
>>
>>
>>karma police arrest spo...@petitmorte.net for posting this in
>>alt.penguin-fetish.recovery:
>>
>>> morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) wrote in
>>> news:a98m4d$6kq$0...@dosa.alt.net:
>>>
>>>> In article <3CB7A98F...@bigpond.com>, "<affinity>"
>>>> <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Shut up. Go away."
>>>>>
>>>> He won't. It's getting pretty funny. World famous kook Elaine
>>>> "Romath" Matthews has joined the team with Dana, Mis, Trippy,
>>>> spooge etc. It's gonna be kook central and lame flames forever.
>>>
>>> Jet, when did it ever matter to me whom else was kicking your ass?
>>>
>>> BTW, haven't you and I already discussed just how silly it is for a
>>> self- acknowledged, medically cerified loon like you to try and
>>> "flame" others as being kooks?
>>>
>>> And didn't that upset you, you tough old "flamer" you? :)
>>>
>>
>>
>>me and spooge are on the same team? rawk!
>>
>>hey, um...are we the "shirts" or the "no shirts"?
>>
>>
>
> ***********
> You can go shirtless, Nat, but John's got to wear at least a man-bra.
if i go shirtless, won't that be a distraction to the other team?
wait, who's on the other team?
>
> - BIg
> "{BNB} is a little Net-Trollop. He sluts his wrath all over the
> place." - John Boyd
> "BNB is a lying buffoon. making up fairy tales about clown
> applications..." - KiwiRock
>
> http://members.aol.com/bignetbuy/clown.txt
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CB9074C...@bigpond.com:
>
>
> "spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
>
>> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
>> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
>> >>
>> >> Hey that was clever.
>> >
>> > How would you know?
>>
>> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
>
> But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
>
> That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
Quite a step up from that <coff> clever <coff> "Shut up. Go away."
Fess up, someone ghosted this last post of yours.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:20020414020519...@mb-fc.aol.com:
> Say, didn't you once claim that I'd disappeared from usenet for
> months, and then were forced to recant your ridiculous allegation when
> you realized that you'd just forgotten how to use your killfile? (And
> had also ignored the fact that you were pinged during the same period
> of time when you insisted I was gone?)
Not that I recall, Dave. Thing is, you spew so much bullshit I tend to not
believe *anything* that you post.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:20020414020226...@mb-fc.aol.com:
>>>>> You missed this. Find a post where I'm at war with DB6 or petitmorte
>>>>> prior to March of last year. That will prove I've been so for
>>>>> "years".
>>>>
>>>>Message-ID: <a6f7v1$8kr$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net>
>>>>
>>>>"You and I were at odds before I got my DB6 account in November of
>>>>2000. That's well over a year. We were at worse odds in February of
>>>>2001, a little over a year ago."
>>>
>>> *************
>>> Say, didn't you once claim there was no connection between db6 and
>>> pedomorte?
>>
>>More than once, Dave. What does the word "or" mean on your planet?
>
> ***************
> "or?" WTF are you ranting about, idiot?
The word 'or' is a pretty basic word in the English language, Dave. As
used in the quote cited, it clearly indicates that the two domains are not
one and the same. To anyone but you, that is.
Dr. Gilbert T. Sullivan
"jet" <morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net> wrote in message
news:a98m4d$6kq$0...@dosa.alt.net...
> In article <3CB7A98F...@bigpond.com>, "<affinity>"
<lu...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >"Shut up. Go away."
> >
> He won't. It's getting pretty funny. World famous kook Elaine "Romath"
> Matthews has joined the team with Dana, Mis, Trippy, spooge etc. It's
> gonna be kook central and lame flames forever.
>
Having problems getting along with people, Jetty?
<affinity>
"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> news:3CB9074C...@bigpond.com:
>
> >
> >
> > "spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >
> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey that was clever.
> >> >
> >> > How would you know?
> >>
> >> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
> >
> > But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
> >
> > That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
>
> Quite a step up from that <coff> clever <coff> "Shut up. Go away."
>
> Fess up, someone ghosted this last post of yours.
You people know what "quotation marks" mean? Hmm?
<affinity>
Fleischpflug wrote:
Fuck off.
<affinity>
Fleischpflug wrote:
How can someone post from "within their thesaurus"? One "uses" a
thesaurus, but short of actually climbing between the bindings, posting
from "within" is pretty hard to do.
Only a mental midget would make such a claim.
jet
Having problems staying away from usenet forever, honey?
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CB9F838...@bigpond.com:
What a coincidence that you'd use the turn of phrase 'mental midget' for
the first time just a day after I used it in a post.
Interesting.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CB9F7E4...@bigpond.com:
Yes, I do. And you probably should have used them around the words "mental
midget" in one of your earlier posts. That is the way one quotes the words
of another.
Fleischpflug
"<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com whined:
>
>
>Fleischpflug wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 13:27:51 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >"Meat-->Plow" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
>> >>
>> >> Hey that was clever.
>> >
>> >How would you know?
>>
>> You're really on a roll. Keep it going.
>
>Fuck off.
Come on now dear, that's not sporting. Take a PMS pill and swallow a
razor blade. That will help you cope with the loss.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a9d2ib$re5$0...@pita.alt.net:
Oh my, "verbal assault" in progress! :)
Fleischpflug
<lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>
>
>Fleischpflug wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 14:06:28 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
>> >
>> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
>> >> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
>> >> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hey that was clever.
>> >> >
>> >> > How would you know?
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
>> >
>> >But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
>> >
>> >That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
>>
>> Do you always post from within your thesaurus to make up for your
>> minimal intelligence?
>
>How can someone post from "within their thesaurus"? One "uses" a
>thesaurus, but short of actually climbing between the bindings, posting
>from "within" is pretty hard to do.
Your thesaurus "state of mind" you laughable fuckstain. Dazzle
everyone with less than common diction. I tried that in the nose back
in 1996 and it didn't fly then.
>
>Only a mental midget would make such a claim.
The mental midget closest to you resides in your mirror.
±
>
> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> news:3CB9F7E4...@bigpond.com:
>
> >
> >
> > "spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >
> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >> news:3CB9074C...@bigpond.com:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> >> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hey that was clever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How would you know?
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
> >> >
> >> > But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
> >> >
> >> > That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
> >>
> >> Quite a step up from that <coff> clever <coff> "Shut up. Go away."
> >>
> >> Fess up, someone ghosted this last post of yours.
> >
> > You people know what "quotation marks" mean? Hmm?
>
> Yes, I do. And you probably should have used them around the words "mental
> midget" in one of your earlier posts. That is the way one quotes the words
> of another.
You wrote that line, huh?
>
> --
> You're so very ordinary
> You're so very lame
> Tastes like whiskey on your lips
> And earthworms rule your brain
>
> http://www.petitmorte.net/fuckingpigs/
--
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000################000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000##### #####0000000000000000000
000000000000000#### The ####000000000000000
0000000000000## Fine Family of Snuh ##0000000000000
0000000000### Newsgroups: ###0000000000
000000000# #000000000
0000000## ##### ###### ##0000000
000000# ####### ######## #000000
00000# ######### ########## #00000
0000# ######### ########## #0000
000# ######### ########## #000
00# ####### ######## #00
0# ##### ###### #0
0# #0
0# news:alt.snuh #0
0# news:alt.tv.simpsons.snuh #0
0# news:alt.binaries.snuh #0
0# news:alt.snuh-made-cascades #0
0# news:alt.ozdebate #0
0# news:alt.folklore.snuh #0
00# # news:alt.swnet.snuh # #00
00# ## news:alt.gossip.snuh ## #00
000# ### ### #000
0000# ###### ###### #0000
00000# ###################### #00000
000000# #000000
0000000## ##0000000
000000000# http://www.geocities.com/buhsnuh #000000000
0000000000### ###0000000000
0000000000000## ##0000000000000
000000000000000#### ####000000000000000
0000000000000000000##### #####0000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000################000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000 Harvey Ball, 1922-2001 RIP :( 00000000000000
+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
|S|a|y| |D|u|h| |t|o| |S|n|u|h|
+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
From: en_mog <en_...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Goodbye :-)
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 08:05:45 -0500
If I have any integrity at all, I must leave.
I welcome others to do so as well if they refuse to be led by a group of
unthinking drones that are stuck in such a mindnumbingly predictable
pattern of
snuh/attack/snuh/attack/penises/attack/snuh/rectum/attack/.
From: TGOS <tg...@spamcop.net>
Newsgroups: alt.hentai.sailor-moon
Subject: Re: Great Newsgroup!
Date: 27 Nov 2000 02:23:19 -0600
Nobody can control the snuh.
Ready to create a new newsgroup?
Everything you need is here:
http://www.aghltfc.com/usenet
pleace add to yuor lits: snuh music
http://artists.mp3s.com/artist_song/770/770142.html
this has been another unique, handcrafted and thoughtful psot from the
Snuh family of fine psoters.
ad88888ba 88 ad88888ba
d8" "8b 88 d8" "8b
Y8, 88 "" a8P
`Y8aaaaa, 8b,YHBTba, 88 88 88,dPPYba, ,a8P"
`"""""8b, 88P' `"8a 88 88 88P' "8a d8"
`8b 88 88 88 88 88 88 ""
Y8a a8P 88 88 "8a, ,a88 88 88 88
"Y88888P" 88 88 `"YbbdP'Y8 88 Get Snuhy!
<affinity>
"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> news:3CB9F7E4...@bigpond.com:
>
> >
> >
> > "spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >
> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >> news:3CB9074C...@bigpond.com:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> >> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hey that was clever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How would you know?
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
> >> >
> >> > But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
> >> >
> >> > That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
> >>
> >> Quite a step up from that <coff> clever <coff> "Shut up. Go away."
> >>
> >> Fess up, someone ghosted this last post of yours.
> >
> > You people know what "quotation marks" mean? Hmm?
>
> Yes, I do.
Right. So when you see quotation marks around something, what does this mean?
> And you probably should have used them around the words "mental
> midget" in one of your earlier posts. That is the way one quotes the words
> of another.
Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is fabulous, this
is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to you that I may have used the
same euphemism because it's part of the COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there
are 12,300 sites currently referenced which contain the very same phrase.
Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
<affinity>
"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> news:3CB9F838...@bigpond.com:
>
> >
> >
> > Fleischpflug wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 14:06:28 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> >> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hey that was clever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How would you know?
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
> >> >
> >> >But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
> >> >
> >> >That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
> >>
> >> Do you always post from within your thesaurus to make up for your
> >> minimal intelligence?
> >
> > How can someone post from "within their thesaurus"? One "uses" a
> > thesaurus, but short of actually climbing between the bindings, posting
> > from "within" is pretty hard to do.
> >
> > Only a mental midget would make such a claim.
>
> What a coincidence that you'd use the turn of phrase 'mental midget' [1]
> for
> the first time just a day after I used it in a post.[2]
>
> Interesting.
[1] It's a well known euphemism, you ignorant person.
[2] I rarely read your posts, except when addressed to me.
<affinity>
Fleischpflug wrote:
You're not even conscious when you post this stuff, are you, Mr. Plod?
jet
<affinity>
Fleischpflug wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 07:14:24 +0930, "<affinity>"
> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Fleischpflug wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 14:06:28 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:3CB8FE3F...@bigpond.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Meat-->Plow" wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:14:15 +0930, "<affinity>"
> >> >> >> <lu...@bigpond.com>wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Shut up. Go away."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hey that was clever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How would you know?
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps he meant it was clever as compared to yo<swat>
> >> >
> >> >But forsooth, our dear Mr. Plod is no arbitrator of intellect.
> >> >
> >> >That would be like getting a coma patient to adjudicate a quiz night.
> >>
> >> Do you always post from within your thesaurus to make up for your
> >> minimal intelligence?
> >
> >How can someone post from "within their thesaurus"? One "uses" a
> >thesaurus, but short of actually climbing between the bindings, posting
> >from "within" is pretty hard to do.
>
> Your thesaurus "state of mind" you laughable fuckstain.
Please elaborate on my "thesaurus state of mind", enquiring minds wanna know,
and all that?
> Dazzle
> everyone with less than common diction. I tried that in the nose back
> in 1996 and it didn't fly then.
That's because "less than common" diction for you equals basic fucking
english for us, bucko.
> >Only a mental midget would make such a claim.
>
> The mental midget closest to you resides in your mirror.
Eww. There's just no helping you.
<affinity>
jet wrote:
I think someone's scratching desperately for something [boohoo] hurtful to say.
JungleAcid
wrote:
>Please elaborate on my "thesaurus state of mind", enquiring minds wanna know,
>and all that?
can i eat a thesaurus, that's all i want to know.
--
JA15x6,2
<affinity>
JungleAcid wrote:
And burp similes?
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CBA29B0...@bigpond.com:
What school is it that you're attending? Are refunds available?
>> And you probably should have used them around the words "mental
>> midget" in one of your earlier posts. That is the way one quotes the
>> words of another.
>
> Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
> fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to you
> that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of the
> COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites currently
> referenced which contain the very same phrase.
No, you mental Munchkin, I'm making note that you seem to have appreciated
that turn of phrase. You had *never* used it until the post I mentioned.
Not once prior. I'd expect that if it was a phrase common to you, you'd
have used it at some point. That is what common means, dearie.
Is it an industrial arts training school that you're attending? Surely it
isn't an academic facility. Flower arranging? Parcel wrapping? Shoelace
tying? Which of those is your major?
> Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
Sorry sweetie, you're soooooooo busted. Or do you always throw these snit-
fits over nothing?
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CBA29BF...@bigpond.com:
Not according to your Google record. It's the first time you ever used the
term. And on a day when you've already been taken to task for using silly,
over-inflated verbiage. You're not having a good day.
> [2] I rarely read your posts, except when addressed to me.
I predict that is a practice you'll be following again soon, to save a
little face.
I won't even mention the fact that the first post of mine that you
responded to was not addressed to you. That would be mean of me to do,
don't you think?
You are sooooooooo busted.
±
> > Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
> > fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to you
> > that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of the
> > COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites currently
> > referenced which contain the very same phrase.
>
> No, you mental Munchkin, I'm making note that you seem to have appreciated
> that turn of phrase. You had *never* used it until the post I mentioned.
I used it three years ago at alt.tv.simpsons - I want full accreditation
that you got the idea from me.
> Not once prior. I'd expect that if it was a phrase common to you, you'd
> have used it at some point. That is what common means, dearie.
>
> Is it an industrial arts training school that you're attending? Surely it
> isn't an academic facility. Flower arranging? Parcel wrapping? Shoelace
> tying? Which of those is your major?
I'd fancy to say that you couldn't pass any of the courses she attends.
> > Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
>
> Sorry sweetie, you're soooooooo busted. Or do you always throw these snit-
> fits over nothing?
This is Spooge not replying.
>
> --
> You're so very ordinary
> You're so very lame
> Tastes like whiskey on your lips
> And earthworms rule your brain
>
> http://www.petitmorte.net/fuckingpigs/
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a9da8b$h3c$2...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
Indeed. Who'd have ever expected something harsh in a post that includes
alt.flame in the groups line? OMG!
Simply shocking! How impolite!
If something isn't done about this, next there may be an outbreak of verbal
assault.
What a world, what a world...
jet
>"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
>>
>> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
>
>> > Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
>> > fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to you
>> > that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of the
>> > COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites currently
>> > referenced which contain the very same phrase.
>>
>> No, you mental Munchkin, I'm making note that you seem to have appreciated
>> that turn of phrase. You had *never* used it until the post I mentioned.
>
>I used it three years ago at alt.tv.simpsons - I want full accreditation
>that you got the idea from me.
>
has very expensive lawyers. Maybe John stole it from you.
>> Not once prior. I'd expect that if it was a phrase common to you, you'd
>> have used it at some point. That is what common means, dearie.
>>
>> Is it an industrial arts training school that you're attending? Surely it
>> isn't an academic facility. Flower arranging? Parcel wrapping? Shoelace
>> tying? Which of those is your major?
>
>I'd fancy to say that you couldn't pass any of the courses she attends.
>
>> > Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
>>
>> Sorry sweetie, you're soooooooo busted. Or do you always throw these snit-
>> fits over nothing?
>
>This is Spooge not replying.
>
>
>>
>> --
>> You're so very ordinary
>> You're so very lame
>> Tastes like whiskey on your lips
>> And earthworms rule your brain
>>
>> http://www.petitmorte.net/fuckingpigs/
>
>
--
±
Oh, you know all her UseNet nicknames?
Maybe you can tell us all of them?
> And on a day when you've already been taken to task for using silly,
> over-inflated verbiage. You're not having a good day.
Maybe it's because she uses big words that your peabrain doesn't grook?
> > [2] I rarely read your posts, except when addressed to me.
>
> I predict that is a practice you'll be following again soon, to save a
> little face.
Yeah, that's funny how people tend to reply to posters, whatta spnak!
> I won't even mention the fact that the first post of mine that you
> responded to was not addressed to you. That would be mean of me to do,
> don't you think?
>
> You are sooooooooo busted.
You mean it's considered poor netiquette to respond to posts that
weren't replies to the person responding?
Can you get the class up to speed on your peculiar brand of netiquette
and list some more from the Big Book of Spoogey Netiquette?
Or is this a special feature of Xnews?
> --
> You're so very ordinary
> You're so very lame
> Tastes like whiskey on your lips
> And earthworms rule your brain
>
> http://www.petitmorte.net/fuckingpigs/
±
>
> In article <3CBA3153...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1?= <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
> >"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >>
> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >
> >> > Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
> >> > fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to you
> >> > that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of the
> >> > COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites currently
> >> > referenced which contain the very same phrase.
> >>
> >> No, you mental Munchkin, I'm making note that you seem to have appreciated
> >> that turn of phrase. You had *never* used it until the post I mentioned.
> >
> >I used it three years ago at alt.tv.simpsons - I want full accreditation
> >that you got the idea from me.
> >
> I think he stole it from Roger, who stole it from John Kimball, who
> has very expensive lawyers. Maybe John stole it from you.
There's no *maybe* to it.
Plagiarism is a ugly word.
> >> Not once prior. I'd expect that if it was a phrase common to you, you'd
> >> have used it at some point. That is what common means, dearie.
> >>
> >> Is it an industrial arts training school that you're attending? Surely it
> >> isn't an academic facility. Flower arranging? Parcel wrapping? Shoelace
> >> tying? Which of those is your major?
> >
> >I'd fancy to say that you couldn't pass any of the courses she attends.
> >
> >> > Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
> >>
> >> Sorry sweetie, you're soooooooo busted. Or do you always throw these snit-
> >> fits over nothing?
> >
> >This is Spooge not replying.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> You're so very ordinary
> >> You're so very lame
> >> Tastes like whiskey on your lips
> >> And earthworms rule your brain
> >>
> >> http://www.petitmorte.net/fuckingpigs/
> >
> >
>
> --
> jet mhm 32x30 |
> wee saul disciple #32 |
> ich bin ein meower |
<affinity>
"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
So? How does this prove that I'm not *aware* of its preexistence as a phrase?
Think carefully.
> And on a day when you've already been taken to task for using silly,
> over-inflated verbiage. You're not having a good day.
Point out where Mr. Plod has accurately taken anyone to task, and I'll eat my
own hat.
> > [2] I rarely read your posts, except when addressed to me.
>
> I predict that is a practice you'll be following again soon, to save a
> little face.
>
> I won't even mention the fact that the first post of mine that you
> responded to was not addressed to you. That would be mean of me to do,
> don't you think?
>
> You are sooooooooo busted.
I said I "rarely" read your posts. Read for comprehension, you trigger-happy
tourette.
<affinity>
"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
Don't worry, you wouldn't make the entrance exam. Now, what does it mean when
you see those funny 66...99 things? Hmm?
> >> And you probably should have used them around the words "mental
> >> midget" in one of your earlier posts. That is the way one quotes the
> >> words of another.
> >
> > Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
> > fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to you
> > that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of the
> > COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites currently
> > referenced which contain the very same phrase.
>
> No, you mental Munchkin,
Forget about trying to flame me, you suck at it.
> I'm making note that you seem to have appreciated
> that turn of phrase.
I used the turn of phrase, yes. Boy, you've really been boning up on this
"cross examination" stuff.
> You had *never* used it until the post I mentioned.
> Not once prior. I'd expect that if it was a phrase common to you, you'd
> have used it at some point. That is what common means, dearie.
Let's get the context right. I used "common" to connote its inclusion, as a
phrase [Mental Midget], within the English lexicon. It's not smart to run away
clutching the loose ends of a bad idea. Read what's written.
>
> Is it an industrial arts training school that you're attending? Surely it
> isn't an academic facility. Flower arranging? Parcel wrapping? Shoelace
> tying? Which of those is your major?
Macramé.
>
> > Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
>
> Sorry sweetie, you're soooooooo busted. Or do you always throw these snit-
> fits over nothing?
I used the word "snit" once, I've NEVAH seen you use it before. OH! YOU
PLAGIARIST!
President Blowfly
news:3CBA29B0...@bigpond.com:
Spooge is a technical term, too.
> --
>
>
> __
> /\ \
> / \ \
> / /\ \ \
> / / /\ \ \
> / / /__\_\ \
> / / /________\
> \/______ffinity
>
>
>
--
My DJ is Better than Your DJ
http://www.mp3.com/manticore
Dead as a Very Dead Thing
http://www.mp3.com/gortician
Beyond UPA
http://www.mp3.com/highc
I'm gonna fucken kick your ass
You're stupid, you know that? Promoting your fake ass shit is only going
to get your ass kicked by the true musicians. I hope you fuicking die,
punk. Gortician is dogshit, and so is High-C.
lord_...@hotmail.com
<affinity>
jet wrote:
> In article <3CBA3153...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1?= <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
> >"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
> >>
> >> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >
> >> > Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
> >> > fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to you
> >> > that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of the
> >> > COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites currently
> >> > referenced which contain the very same phrase.
> >>
> >> No, you mental Munchkin, I'm making note that you seem to have appreciated
> >> that turn of phrase. You had *never* used it until the post I mentioned.
> >
> >I used it three years ago at alt.tv.simpsons - I want full accreditation
> >that you got the idea from me.
> >
> I think he stole it from Roger, who stole it from John Kimball, who
> has very expensive lawyers. Maybe John stole it from you.
Everyone knows I stole it from Dean. OHKAY - I admit it.
jet
<affinity>
jet wrote:
Hear that, buddy? BUSSSSSSSTED!
<affinity>
President Blowfly wrote:
I can see how it could be applied.
spo...@petitmorte.net
jet
and Meat-->Plow, before you jumped in to "help", spunky?
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CBA38D8...@bigpond.com:
No, I won't assist you in studying for your English finals.
>> >> And you probably should have used them around the words "mental
>> >> midget" in one of your earlier posts. That is the way one quotes
>> >> the words of another.
>> >
>> > Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
>> > fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to
>> > you that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of
>> > the COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites
>> > currently referenced which contain the very same phrase.
>>
>> No, you mental Munchkin,
>
> Forget about trying to flame me, you suck at it.
<coff> If your opinion was of any consequence I'd ask for it.
>> I'm making note that you seem to have appreciated
>> that turn of phrase.
>
> I used the turn of phrase, yes. Boy, you've really been boning up on
> this "cross examination" stuff.
Only the once. So by all of the evidence, it isn't a "common" phrase in
your vocabulary. This isn't a cross examination, Sugar. Mocking you is
more like it.
>> You had *never* used it until the post I mentioned.
>> Not once prior. I'd expect that if it was a phrase common to you,
>> you'd have used it at some point. That is what common means, dearie.
>
> Let's get the context right. I used "common" to connote its inclusion,
> as a phrase [Mental Midget], within the English lexicon. It's not
> smart to run away clutching the loose ends of a bad idea. Read what's
> written.
It may indeed be a common phrase, but you've never used it before. So it
certainly appears that you only did so after having recently read it. And
your reaction certainly supports that theory. Guilt pangs and whatnot.
>> Is it an industrial arts training school that you're attending?
>> Surely it isn't an academic facility. Flower arranging? Parcel
>> wrapping? Shoelace tying? Which of those is your major?
>
> Macramé.
Good for you. Will you get to use sharp things next semester?
>> > Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
>>
>> Sorry sweetie, you're soooooooo busted. Or do you always throw these
>> snit- fits over nothing?
>
> I used the word "snit" once, I've NEVAH seen you use it before. OH!
> YOU PLAGIARIST!
You should have checked Google before you posted this. When someone uses a
phrase as a common part of their speech, they can be expected to actually
use the phrase in their posts.
I double-dog dare you to Google my address and the word 'snit'. Hell, do
it on 'mental midget' too. Then do the same on your address. I must have
missed the one snit you posted...
I'll be gracious when you offer your apology. I promise. :)
±
At what point to you begin to flail your arms in the air, start the Ed
Grimely dance and begin to yap about spammers and morphers in troll
groups?
How did that Cleaning Up UPA campaign do - are trolls finally snipping
and no longer x-posting to non-relevant groups?
Good work, Stooge.
>
> --
> You're so very ordinary
> You're so very lame
> Tastes like whiskey on your lips
> And earthworms rule your brain
>
> http://www.petitmorte.net/fuckingpigs/
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a9dea3$l7p$0...@dosa.alt.net:
Sorry, dearie. I used it well before you did. Wanna try again for another
"win", Fan-Jet?
Perhaps I missed your use of it in February^h^h^h^March of 2001?
±
This is spamming, pure and simple.
>
> --
> jet mhm 32x30 |
> wee saul disciple #32 |
> ich bin ein meower |
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CBA3EE4...@bigpond.com:
Ahem. I'll suggest this to you one more time: Check Google before you
make a fool of yourself. You don't want to follow in Jet's footsteps, do
you? Tsk, tsk, tsk. I suppose there is no real research required when one
studies macrame....
'Snit fit'
Me:
Sept 12, 2001
Sept 18, 2001
Dec 20, 2001
April 22, 2001
Jet:
Apr 4, 2002
Last laughs and such comes to mind.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CBA2D6A...@bigpond.com:
So you only react when something hurtful is said to you?
I thought so.
jet
2001.
SPANK.
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:a9dc0s$mt8$1...@paradoxa.ogoense.net:
> In article <3CBA3153...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>,
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1?= <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>>"spo...@petitmorte.net" wrote:
>>>
>>> "<affinity>" <lu...@bigpond.com> wrote in
>>
>>> > Are you claiming right of title for "mental midget"? Oh, this is
>>> > fabulous, this is just too much. Spooge, has it ever occurred to
>>> > you that I may have used the same euphemism because it's part of
>>> > the COMMON English lexicon? In fact, there are 12,300 sites
>>> > currently referenced which contain the very same phrase.
>>>
>>> No, you mental Munchkin, I'm making note that you seem to have
>>> appreciated that turn of phrase. You had *never* used it until the
>>> post I mentioned.
>>
>>I used it three years ago at alt.tv.simpsons - I want full
>>accreditation that you got the idea from me.
>>
> I think he stole it from Roger, who stole it from John Kimball, who
> has very expensive lawyers. Maybe John stole it from you.
I think it's very funny how easy it is for me to get you, and your new chum
Affinity, all wound up. :)
>>> Not once prior. I'd expect that if it was a phrase common to you,
>>> you'd have used it at some point. That is what common means,
>>> dearie.
>>>
>>> Is it an industrial arts training school that you're attending?
>>> Surely it isn't an academic facility. Flower arranging? Parcel
>>> wrapping? Shoelace tying? Which of those is your major?
>>
>>I'd fancy to say that you couldn't pass any of the courses she
>>attends.
Yo, Dean! I was going to thank you for not having morphed in quite a long
time. I haven't seen one of your pissant posts in ages. :)
>>> > Talk about a fucking "no brainer", you ning-nong.
>>>
>>> Sorry sweetie, you're soooooooo busted. Or do you always throw
>>> these snit- fits over nothing?
>>
>>This is Spooge not replying.
This is me laughing at Dean trying desperately to get my attention.
Watch him morph his address as soon as he reads this post. :)
spo...@petitmorte.net
news:3CBA3BB1...@bigpond.com:
That explains a lot. You get your awesome research and flaming skills from
Jet, and your awesome writing skills from Deano.
Tying string was a good career choice for you.
jet
because:
>Jet:
>
>Apr 4, 2002
>
March 23, 2000. I wasn't archiving but it's quoted in message:
<sdjtto...@corp.supernews.com>
>Last laughs and such comes to mind.
>
Uh huh. Ha.