Everyone gets 3 wishes
Ed the cat
>
>That's what you get for thinking!
Yeah, I guess so....
Well, I thought I was thinking, but was I actually thinking? How do
you/me/we know that we/me/you are thinking? Well, I guess if we thinking we
are thinking then that is thinking in itself....
but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
Ali Hassan
that's pretty buddhistic for a cat.
Ed the cat
Well, cat's can do many things. One just flew past my window a few minutes
ago...
Ed the cat
I've never studied Buddhism, so I wouldn't know...
Well, at least I don't think I have....or rather: I think that I don't think
that I have.....
......but I'm not sure.........
Miss Bunnyhead
I dunno, but if you stop, are you still there?
Elmyra (^_^)
Ali Hassan
maybe in one of your previous 6 lives.
Vanina
Ed the cat wrote in message
<931090313.24779.3...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>>Well!
>>
>>That's what you get for thinking!
>
>
>Yeah, I guess so....
>
>Well, I thought I was thinking, but was I actually thinking? How do
>you/me/we know that we/me/you are thinking? Well, I guess if we thinking we
>are thinking then that is thinking in itself....
>
>but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
>
>
>
Let me think about it..
DinkiPixie
>but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
Thomething in the thea?
--
Angela Touchstone
Ed the cat
maybe, but doesn't a cat get 9 lives? so it would be in one of my previous 8
lives...
Ed the cat
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not actually be
thinking....
or will you???????.............
Ed the cat
>Ed the cat wrote:
>>
>> >Well!
>> >
>> >That's what you get for thinking!
>>
>> Yeah, I guess so....
>>
>> Well, I thought I was thinking, but was I actually thinking? How do
>> you/me/we know that we/me/you are thinking? Well, I guess if we thinking
we
>> are thinking then that is thinking in itself....
>>
>
I dunno, but if you stopped, would you know? Because if you weren't
thinking, you wouldn't be allowed to think "I'm not thinking", because that
would be thinking you see. So, you'd never know if you'd not been thinking,
because everything would have gone blank for that period of time, a bit like
being knocked out.
I guess what it all comes down to is this: Are we just thoughts? Maybe if we
are thoughts + feelings then we would "feel" that we weren't thinking, in
which case we would still be there. unless of course we only "thought" we
were feeling, in which case we are back to thinking again...
...it all just goes round and round again....
....kinda swirly like a falling leaf...................
Cyrano
"Ed the cat" <ed_c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Well!
> >
> >That's what you get for thinking!
>
> Yeah, I guess so....
>
> Well, I thought I was thinking, but was I actually thinking? How do
> you/me/we know that we/me/you are thinking? Well, I guess if we
thinking we
> are thinking then that is thinking in itself....
>
> but then we get into the arguement of What
is 'Thinking'?"..............
I think I think, therefore I think I am. (I think.)
Cyrano
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Ali Hassan
Lets see, alt.thinking hurts, alt. stupidity,
alt.stupidity.me-too....are you sure you're a bodhisattva
cat on your last or next-to-last one?
Jane
>....kinda swirly like a falling leaf...................
that was beautiful
*watches leaf falling in a pleasant but dazed state*
SereneBabe
>
> Miss Bunnyhead wrote in message <377FC2...@HASBEENheart.net>...
> >Ed the cat wrote:
> >> I thought I was thinking, but was I actually thinking? How do
> >> you/me/we know that we/me/you are thinking? Well, I guess if we thinking we
> >> are thinking then that is thinking in itself....
> >>
> >> but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
> >
>
> I dunno, but if you stopped, would you know? Because if you weren't
> thinking, you wouldn't be allowed to think "I'm not thinking", because that
> would be thinking you see. So, you'd never know if you'd not been thinking,
> because everything would have gone blank for that period of time, a bit like
> being knocked out.
>
> I guess what it all comes down to is this: Are we just thoughts? Maybe if we
> are thoughts + feelings then we would "feel" that we weren't thinking, in
> which case we would still be there. unless of course we only "thought" we
> were feeling, in which case we are back to thinking again...
>
> ...it all just goes round and round again....
>
My mother doesn't "see" thinks when she thinks. So, that whole
thing of "don't think about a zebra" is something she can
actually do because most of us, when told, "don't think about a
zebra" get a picture in our minds and can't shake it no matter
what we do, the picture of the zebra is poking around in there.
I can't imagine "thinking" without pictures.
I'm pretty sure that Buddhists would say that we are, in fact,
just thoughts/feelings and even those are illusive unless we
attain true enlightenment... but I only started reading about
Buddhism today out of a little palm-sized mini-Buddhism
"meditations" book.
All reality is socially constructed. Without thinking there can
be no social life, without social life there is no reality.
That's what I think.
Heather
****************
"It's All About Me!" a weekly column by SereneBabe
http://members.aol.com/serenebabe/index.html
June 30, 1999: "If Not for T.V."
Vanina
Ed the cat wrote in message
>>>but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not actually be
>thinking....
>
>or will you???????.............
>
>
>
>
>
Va-nee-na
Should we take over the world?
Dave F.
help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
Dave F.
good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
Cadmium Flute
but thinking is never in style
Floppy Fox
(Cadmium Flute) wrote:
It's a good thing, too
The All Powerful
Cadmium Flute wrote:
> would anyone like some hot sex?
I'm still counting my sperm. ask me later...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Life is the development of a corpse.
Ali Hassan
>
> >would anyone like some hot sex?
> >
> >>>
> >>> Ed the cat wrote in message
> >>> <931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >>> >>>but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>Let me think about it..
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not actually be
> >>> >thinking....
> >>> >
> >>> >or will you???????.............
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> Oh, I am without any mistake thinking.....now, what am I thinking about?
> >>>
> >>> Va-nee-na
> >>>
> >>> Should we take over the world?
> >>
> >>good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
> >
> >but thinking is never in style
>
> It's a good thing, too
you think?
(creeping kid) Sara (VSM)
Well I think I am thinking, therefore I possibly am...
<wonders if anyone knows where that is quoted from>
--
.-------------------.--------------------.
| Sara W (aka. VSM) | to e-mail, replace |
| http://fly.to/vsm |"fiend" with "saint"|
'-------------------"--------------------'
Ed the cat
<37826ee4...@netnews.worldnet.att.net>...
>Chris Canning Wrote:
>
>>It might help your sex life to look up the definition of drone.
>
>Words can have more than 1 meaning.
Yeah, like "Nimby" for example...
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>
What is "thea"?
:o)
Ed the cat
DinkiPixie
>would anyone like some hot sex?
Can I have some hot socks?
Failing that a tin of beans and a smoothing iron.
--
Angela Touchstone
DinkiPixie
>What is "thea"?
What dolphinth thwim in.
--
Angela Touchstone
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> would anyone like some hot sex?
>
> >Vanina wrote:
> >>
> >> Ed the cat wrote in message
> >> <931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >> >>>but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>Let me think about it..
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not actually
> >> >be thinking....
> >> >
> >> >or will you???????.............
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Oh, I am without any mistake thinking.....now, what am I thinking about?
> >>
> >> Va-nee-na
> >>
> >> Should we take over the world?
> >
> >good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
>
> but thinking is never in style
mink coats and no manners
Suki
<3783594c...@139.134.5.33>...
> would anyone like some hot sex?
yes. (leaving this one crossposted)
--
Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
> >Vanina wrote:
> >>
> >> Ed the cat wrote in message
> >> <931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >> >>>but then we get into the arguement of What is
'Thinking'?"..............
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>Let me think about it..
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not
actually be
> >> >thinking....
> >> >
> >> >or will you???????.............
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Oh, I am without any mistake thinking.....now, what am I thinking
about?
> >>
> >> Va-nee-na
> >>
> >> Should we take over the world?
> >
> >good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
>
> but thinking is never in style
it is indeed stylish to be brainless of late....
ask my next door slut, I mean neighbor...... she'd know...
--
Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
Ian Hammond
Front porches and flotillions are on Armada this week
And you don't need a brain to control your crotch
Ask the Spanish about their expedition
to the coalfields of my sluts desire
to the deep mines of my tarts respose
to the underground of my moles folly
(and I don't need additional apostophes inserted)
--
ian
Cadmium Flute
thanks for that intro... now i just need to be serious a moment here
folks, for the sake of the few who arent aware of me and my incredible
story - yes, the rumors you may have heard are true... i did invent
thinking... it was in 1812... and i am recounting the details for your
delectation throughout usenet...
what this means in practical terms is that we can all relax, stretch
out and start mumbling inanely. forget about the thinking -
everythings going to be alllllllll wrong.
M.C.Harrison
Ed the cat wrote in message
<931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>>>but then we get into the arguement of What is 'Thinking'?"..............
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Let me think about it..
>>
>>
>
>Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not actually be
>thinking....
>
>or will you???????.............
Heh, a' nint'restin' odditie cropped up the other day, concerning Deja Vue
(the precognitive illusion rather than the web utility).
The way it worked was like this. Someone experiences Deja Vue, and for the
duration of the experience, they have absolute certainty that they know
precisely what is going to happen having seen it already before. Let's not
worry about what the significance is, just take the notion as is for the
time being. Now at some point, the person realises that something untoward
will soon happen, and to forestall this, they interfere with the situation,
e.g. interrupt someone about to say something they shouldn't.
Naturally, this breaks the causal chain of events and the Deja Vue vanishes
as quickly as the lurkers in misc.creativity when stuff gets heavy. Well,
that would be because it relied on nobody breaking the chain in order for it
to work. More to the point, the absolute certainty of what the future held
is no longer true, having interfered with some of the reasons for it being
that way.
Now first, the feeling of certainty must be wrong, since the future did not
hold the event foreseen. Yet without the interference, it was clear as day
and 100% sure to happen. But what if someone else were also to have Deja Vue
at the same time, and acquire the same ablility to meddle with causality?
That certainty would have to be wrong, as either one or other person,
despite both seeing exactly the same future, can "break" the future by
acting in the present. What is the effect on the person who does not break
the chain and is watching events unfold with the sureness of Deja Vue of
what will happen, and finds out that it isn't true?
Conceptually, can only one person at a time or within a given situation
experience Deja Vue? What regulates this arbitration? Who stops Deja Vue
experiences or interferences to prevent malinterractions?
Are the people unaware that their future is set in stone unless the viewer
acts to change it, thinking themselves? To the same degree?
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> would anyone like some hot sex?
>
> >On 8 Jul 1999 02:52:34 GMT, "Suki" <Suk...@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Cadmium Flute <cadmiu...@dittosrush.com> wrote in article
> >><3783594c...@139.134.5.33>...
> >>> would anyone like some hot sex?
> >>
> >>yes. (leaving this one crossposted)
> >>
> >>--
> >>Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
> >>
> >>> >Vanina wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Ed the cat wrote in message
> >>> >> <931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >>> >> >>>but then we get into the arguement of What is
> >>'Thinking'?"..............
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>Let me think about it..
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not
> >>actually be
> >>> >> >thinking....
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >or will you???????.............
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> Oh, I am without any mistake thinking.....now, what am I thinking
> >>about?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Va-nee-na
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Should we take over the world?
> >>> >
> >>> >good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
> >>>
> >>> but thinking is never in style
> >>
> >>it is indeed stylish to be brainless of late....
> >>
> >>ask my next door slut, I mean neighbor...... she'd know...
> >
> >Front porches and flotillions are on Armada this week
> >And you don't need a brain to control your crotch
> >Ask the Spanish about their expedition
> >to the coalfields of my sluts desire
> >to the deep mines of my tarts respose
> >to the underground of my moles folly
> >(and I don't need additional apostophes inserted)
>
> thanks for that intro... now i just need to be serious a moment here
> folks, for the sake of the few who arent aware of me and my incredible
> story - yes, the rumors you may have heard are true... i did invent
> thinking... it was in 1812... and i am recounting the details for your
> delectation throughout usenet...
>
> what this means in practical terms is that we can all relax, stretch
> out and start mumbling inanely. forget about the thinking -
> everythings going to be alllllllll wrong.
finally, something to look forward to!
Ian Hammond
Can we drop the "thinking" bit and get back to the "hot sex" thread.
The two things are not synonomous. Like "prithee" and "praeter".
--
ian
Richh
Ian Hammond wrote:
Sorry, ian, but most of us here really do like thinking about hot sex, more
often than practicing hot sex. It helps to keep the mind interested.
richh, thinking, thinking, thinking
Morticia
M.C.Harrison wrote in message <37846...@145.227.194.253>...
>
>Ed the cat wrote in message
><931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>>>>but then we get into the arguement of What is
'Thinking'?"..............
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Let me think about it..
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not actually
be
>>thinking....
>>
>>or will you???????.............
>
>
That's a good analogy of the phenomenom known as deja vu, but the one
some scientists use goes like this...the person experiencing it has a
tiny little blackout (a misfiring of the synapsis) that lasts a
nanosecond and when they come out of it they think Hey, I've experienced
this before...which in a way they have ...just seconds before. So it is
a Synaptical Illusion (tm) ..as opposed to an optical one, that makes it
seem like the person is repeating history. Sometimes I get the same
feeling when I drink too much and am talking to God via the big white
porcelein telephone and I think Hey, it feels like I just experienced
this yesterday...then I think..oh yeah, I DID just experience this
yesterday.
The End.
>
Suki
<379646e5...@news.supernews.com>...
> On 8 Jul 1999 02:52:34 GMT, "Suki" <Suk...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> >Cadmium Flute <cadmiu...@dittosrush.com> wrote in article
> ><3783594c...@139.134.5.33>...
> >> would anyone like some hot sex?
> >
> >yes. (leaving this one crossposted)
> >
> >--
> >Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
> >
> >> >Vanina wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> <931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >> >> >>>but then we get into the arguement of What is
> >'Thinking'?"..............
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Let me think about it..
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not
> >actually be
> >> >> >thinking....
> >> >> >
> >> >> >or will you???????.............
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >about?
> >> >>
> >> >> Va-nee-na
> >> >>
> >> >> Should we take over the world?
> >> >
> >> >good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
> >>
> >> but thinking is never in style
> >
> >it is indeed stylish to be brainless of late....
> >
> >ask my next door slut, I mean neighbor...... she'd know...
>
> Front porches and flotillions are on Armada this week
> And you don't need a brain to control your crotch
> Ask the Spanish about their expedition
> to the coalfields of my sluts desire
> to the deep mines of my tarts respose
> to the underground of my moles folly
> (and I don't need additional apostophes inserted)
sparkly! good luck!
Suki
> would anyone like some hot sex?
shit. passed over again.
> thanks for that intro... now i just need to be serious a moment here
> folks, for the sake of the few who arent aware of me and my incredible
> story - yes, the rumors you may have heard are true... i did invent
> thinking... it was in 1812... and i am recounting the details for your
> delectation throughout usenet...
>
> what this means in practical terms is that we can all relax, stretch
> out and start mumbling inanely. forget about the thinking -
> everythings going to be alllllllll wrong.
i already know that.
--
Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
Ed the cat
>help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
W**king has always be an important part of mine.
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>
>
>>....kinda swirly like a falling leaf...................
>
>
>*watches leaf falling in a pleasant but dazed state*
I like beautiful things. Are you by any chance beautiful?
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>Oh, I am without any mistake thinking.....now, what am I thinking about?
Running around naked in the woods with me?
>Should we take over the world?
First we'll have to climb this tree to see if the enemies are coming....
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
Are they???? No-one told me that! I'm always the last to know!....
(Ed burts into tears...)
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>but thinking is never in style
Or orange in colour
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>It's a good thing, too
yeah, good things usually are
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>you think?
I think so, or maybe I think I do...
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>Well I think I am thinking, therefore I possibly am...
I think you're thinking, therefore I'm possibly thinking I think that you
possibly think you're thinking
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
<7m04om$oq2$1...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>...
>
>
>Cadmium Flute wrote:
>
>> would anyone like some hot sex?
>
Me too. I'm up to 5 already!
>Life is the development of a corpse.
Life is a sunny day
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>Ed the cat wrote:
>>
>> >maybe in one of your previous 6 lives.
>>
>> maybe, but doesn't a cat get 9 lives? so it would be in one of my
previous 8
>> lives...
>
>Lets see, alt.thinking hurts, alt. stupidity,
>alt.stupidity.me-too....are you sure you're a bodhisattva
>cat on your last or next-to-last one?
What's a bodhisattva cat?
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>I think I think, therefore I think I am. (I think.)
I think you think you think, therefore I think you think you are. (well, i
think I thought so anyway...)
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>My mother doesn't "see" thinks when she thinks. So, that whole
>thing of "don't think about a zebra" is something she can
>actually do because most of us, when told, "don't think about a
>zebra" get a picture in our minds and can't shake it no matter
>what we do, the picture of the zebra is poking around in there.
Cool.
>I can't imagine "thinking" without pictures.
I can't imiagine "thinking" without "thoughts".
>I'm pretty sure that Buddhists would say that we are, in fact,
>just thoughts/feelings and even those are illusive unless we
>attain true enlightenment... but I only started reading about
>Buddhism today out of a little palm-sized mini-Buddhism
>"meditations" book.
Interesting....
>All reality is socially constructed. Without thinking there can
>be no social life, without social life there is no reality.
I agree.
>That's what I think.
Or at least, what you think you think.
:o)
Ed the cat
Suki
Ian Hammond <i...@hammo.com> wrote in article
<379abfaa...@news.supernews.com>...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 06:56:00 -0800, mi...@thegrid.net (The Queen of Cans
> and Jars) wrote:
>
> >Cadmium Flute <cadmiu...@dittosrush.com> wrote:
> >
> >> would anyone like some hot sex?
> >>
> >> >On 8 Jul 1999 02:52:34 GMT, "Suki" <Suk...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Cadmium Flute <cadmiu...@dittosrush.com> wrote in article
> >> >><3783594c...@139.134.5.33>...
> >> >>> would anyone like some hot sex?
> >> >>
> >> >>yes. (leaving this one crossposted)
> >> >>
> >> >>--
> >> >>Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
> >> >>
> >> >>> >Vanina wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Ed the cat wrote in message
> >> >>> >> <931292191.15887.2...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >> >>> >> >>>but then we get into the arguement of What is
> >> >>'Thinking'?"..............
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>Let me think about it..
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >Well, I'll let you "think" you're thinking, but you might not
> >> >>actually be
> >> >>> >> >thinking....
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >or will you???????.............
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> Oh, I am without any mistake thinking.....now, what am I
thinking
> >> >>about?
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Va-nee-na
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Should we take over the world?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >good manners and cotillions are making a comeback
> >> >>>
> >> >>> but thinking is never in style
> >> >>
> >> >>it is indeed stylish to be brainless of late....
> >> >>
> >> >>ask my next door slut, I mean neighbor...... she'd know...
> >> >
> >> >Front porches and flotillions are on Armada this week
> >> >And you don't need a brain to control your crotch
> >> >Ask the Spanish about their expedition
> >> >to the coalfields of my sluts desire
> >> >to the deep mines of my tarts respose
> >> >to the underground of my moles folly
> >> >(and I don't need additional apostophes inserted)
> >>
> >> thanks for that intro... now i just need to be serious a moment here
> >> folks, for the sake of the few who arent aware of me and my incredible
> >> story - yes, the rumors you may have heard are true... i did invent
> >> thinking... it was in 1812... and i am recounting the details for your
> >> delectation throughout usenet...
> >>
> >> what this means in practical terms is that we can all relax, stretch
> >> out and start mumbling inanely. forget about the thinking -
> >> everythings going to be alllllllll wrong.
> >
> >finally, something to look forward to!
>
> Can we drop the "thinking" bit and get back to the "hot sex" thread.
> The two things are not synonomous. Like "prithee" and "praeter".
synergists, they, like beer and wine, like my husband and i.........
--
Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
Suki
> > ian
>
> Sorry, ian, but most of us here really do like thinking about hot sex,
more
> often than practicing hot sex. It helps to keep the mind interested.
>
> richh, thinking, thinking, thinking
you miss on a few points here. it is highly enjoyable to keep the mind
interested, and, atleast i, may conjoin this joy with my hand.........
thereby making it joyously joyful and highly excitatious! and, atleast to
me.... this practice of hot sex, can be hotter than the real thing, atleast
that of my memory. it's also less sweaty and smelly.......
--
Suki-- 43.2215N -77.5982W
The Right Hand
The All Powerful
Ed the cat wrote:
> Dave F. wrote:
> >help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
>
> W**king has always be an important part of mine.
Working?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The All Powerful
Ed the cat wrote:
> The All Powerful wrote in message
> <7m04om$oq2$1...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>...
> >
> >
> >Cadmium Flute wrote:
> >
> >> would anyone like some hot sex?
> >
> >I'm still counting my sperm. ask me later...
>
> Me too. I'm up to 5 already!
>
Does Mas**rbation hurt with those barbs on your kn*b??
> >Life is the development of a corpse.
>
> Life is a sunny day
Life is like a box of chocolates, it melts if you leave it out too
long...
(creeping kid) Sara (VSM)
> Dave F. wrote:
> >help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
>
>
> W**king has always be an important part of mine.
>
The Merkins won't know that one...!
--
.-------------------.--------------------.
| Sara W (aka. VSM) | to e-mail, replace |
| http://fly.to/vsm |"fiend" with "saint"|
'-------------------"--------------------'
(creeping kid) Sara (VSM)
> >you think?
>
> I think so, or maybe I think I do...
>
Shut up! I'm in PPPPAAAAIIIIIINNNN!!!!
Cyrano
soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
> Ed the cat wrote:
>
> > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
or winking or walking or ...
Cyrano
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Ali Hassan
Never mind.
Ali Hassan
>
> Dave F. wrote:
> >help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
>
>
>
> Ed the cat
Bad kitty. BAD!
(creeping kid) Sara (VSM)
You'll get hairy hands... oh? You already have? No opposable thumb?
Must make matters difficult...
Ali Hassan
>
> would anyone like some hot mentation?
>
> >On 8 Jul 1999 02:52:34 GMT, "Suki" <Suk...@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Cadmium Flute <cadmiu...@dittosrush.com> wrote in article
> >><3783594c...@139.134.5.33>...
> >>
I've maintained all along that Descartes was a poseur, who
was only doing cheap saccharin imitation thinking- a
knockoff of the real thing. So did he rip you off and get
published first, or was it all part of your plan....don't
tell me you invented...planning too???
The All Powerful
Cyrano wrote:
> In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
> soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ed the cat wrote:
> >
> > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
> >
> > Working?
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
>
> or winking or walking or ...
Just so long as it's not working...
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> Cyrano wrote:
>
> > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
> > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Ed the cat wrote:
> > >
> > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
> > >
> > > Working?
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------
> >
> > or winking or walking or ...
>
> Just so long as it's not working...
wicking
Leo Sgouros
The Queen of Cans and Jars <mi...@thegrid.net> wrote in message
news:1dumq8l.1px...@lax-ts1-h1-40-88.ispmodems.net...
wanking
Nick Wise
>
> The All Powerful <soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Cyrano wrote:
> >
> > > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
> > > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ed the cat wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
> > > >
> > > > Working?
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -------------
> > >
> > > or winking or walking or ...
> >
> > Just so long as it's not working...
>
> wicking
wisking?
--
Nick Wise
http://personal.sdf.bellsouth.net/~headless
I'm gonna drive to the highest hill,
Gonna take control, gonna free my will
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> >
> > The All Powerful <soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Cyrano wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
> > > > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ed the cat wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Working?
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > -------------
> > > >
> > > > or winking or walking or ...
> > >
> > > Just so long as it's not working...
> >
> > wicking
>
> wisking?
that's right, Nick, keep it in the kitchen.
Leo Sgouros
You can wank in the kitchen!
Chris Canning
>
> Can we drop the "thinking" bit and get back to the "hot sex" thread.
> The two things are not synonomous. Like "prithee" and "praeter".
>
> --
> ian
This is why so many people are dissatidfied with their sex life. They
underestimate the importance of the thinking aspect of sex.
Chris
Ian Hammond
wrote:
Thinking about sex is fine. Planning is important too. I can't
remember what they were thinking about because you've snipped my
immediate attention span out of existence. But my Libido indicator
tells me they weren't thinking about sex.
--
ian
Cadmium Flute
both descartes dabblings and the concept of planning can be derived
from the same generic framework of thinking, which i first presented
in 1812. unfortunately descartes did not have the utility of thinking
available to him as it was not communicated backwards through time.
perhaps it should be. might tidy up some of this mess and take the
pressure off us current-dayers.
M.C.Harrison
Ed the cat wrote in message
>SereneBabe wrote:
>>My mother doesn't "see" thinks when she thinks. So, that whole
>>thing of "don't think about a zebra" is something she can
>>actually do because most of us, when told, "don't think about a
>>zebra" get a picture in our minds and can't shake it no matter
>>what we do, the picture of the zebra is poking around in there.
>Cool.
Penguins are cool. Zebras tend to be hot. Mind you, they're a right
moralising bunch of overly-sensitive types, Zebras, to them everything is
absolutely black or white with no room for compromise. Still, at least
penguins dress smart, even when they're just out on a fishing trip with the
lads.
>>I can't imagine "thinking" without pictures.
>I can't imiagine "thinking" without "thoughts".
I can't imagine thinking about, erm, Holst's planets suite with pictures. I
can imagine that some are so much into sight that the other senses are
merely ways to confirm the evidence of direct observation, (looks like a
penguin, smells like a penguin, sounds like a penguin) but for me the
concept merely has sensory attributes which may or may not be relevant when
thinking about it. So a piece of music has no colour, and a cunning strategy
has no picture, sound or other gross sensory properties. Or, like a game of
chess, there's no need to look at the board in order to know what's going
on, providing you are playing holistically. Just watch the blobs and
determine strategic plans, you need to identify pieces when looking at each
tactical move, though.
OTOH, it is difficult for me to conceive of e.g. Cindy Crawford other than
as a still image.
>>I'm pretty sure that Buddhists would say that we are, in fact,
>>just thoughts/feelings and even those are illusive unless we
>>attain true enlightenment... but I only started reading about
>>Buddhism today out of a little palm-sized mini-Buddhism
>>"meditations" book.
>Interesting....
These humans, eh? Give em a book and they think they know everything.
I don't think there are many books about hunting squeaky birds/mice but if
there were, the humans would be just as clumsy and slow about it.
>>All reality is socially constructed. Without thinking there can
>>be no social life, without social life there is no reality.
>I agree.
How would reality start, in the absense of society?
>>That's what I think.
>Or at least, what you think you think.
I think it isn't what I think, therefore I think I cannot know if it is
thinking.
Linda
Cadmium Flute wrote in message <378b926c...@139.134.5.33>...
>would anyone like some hot sex?
>
Linda
Linda
Ed the cat wrote in message
>Dave F. wrote:
>>help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
>
>
>
Linda
Cadmium Flute
>
>Cadmium Flute wrote in message <378b926c...@139.134.5.33>...
>>would anyone like some hot sex?
>>
>Wouldn't mind a hot curry. Do you deliver?
yes.
but my only curry is "heavy curry". you will usually end up stepping
in it.
i also deliver messages, but some are bad. they also can be stepped
in. to make matters worse some are labeled as bad but are in fact
quite good.
finally, note that i also deliver delivery channels.
Ian Hammond
Deliberately?
--
ian
ian hammond
>
>> Cyrano wrote:
>>
>> > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Ed the cat wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
>> > >
>> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > -------------
>> >
>> > or winking or walking or ...
>>
>> Just so long as it's not working...
>
>wicking
Yup. You're just a Candle in the Wick.
--
ian
The Queen of Cans and Jars
The All Powerful
The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> The All Powerful <soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Cyrano wrote:
> >
> > > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
> > > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ed the cat wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
> > > >
> > > > Working?
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -------------
> > >
> > > or winking or walking or ...
> >
> > Just so long as it's not working...
>
> wicking
Walking? No, I prefer flying personally... i just flap my arms and off I go...
The All Powerful
Chris Canning wrote:
> >
> >
> > Can we drop the "thinking" bit and get back to the "hot sex" thread.
> > The two things are not synonomous. Like "prithee" and "praeter".
> >
> > --
> > ian
>
> This is why so many people are dissatidfied with their sex life. They
> underestimate the importance of the thinking aspect of sex.
The thinking part of sex?? I'm quite into the thinking part...
unfortunately I don't seem to be getting much of the other part at the
mo...
The All Powerful
Linda wrote:
> Cadmium Flute wrote in message <378b926c...@139.134.5.33>...
> >would anyone like some hot sex?
> >
> Wouldn't mind a hot curry. Do you deliver?
Yes Madam. What address prease?? You want poppadom with that? Mango
Chutney? Fire crew on standby?
Ian Hammond
<soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
>
>> The All Powerful <soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Cyrano wrote:
>> >
>> > > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
>> > > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Ed the cat wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
>> > > >
>> > > > Working?
>> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > -------------
>> > >
>> > > or winking or walking or ...
>> >
>> > Just so long as it's not working...
>>
>> wicking
>
> Walking? No, I prefer flying personally... i just flap my arms and off I go...
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Life is the development of a corpse.
Wicking on water wasn't built in a day.
--
ian
ian hammond
>
>> >The All Powerful <soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Cyrano wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
>> >> > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Ed the cat wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Working?
>> >> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > -------------
>> >> >
>> >> > or winking or walking or ...
>> >>
>> >> Just so long as it's not working...
>> >
>> >wicking
>>
>
>i can't stay a candle.
I'd wick a million candles of one of your mandibles
--
ian
Ed the cat
<3791ef8...@netnews.worldnet.att.net>...
>Listen here, Mr. cat.
Mr. Cat is listening.
>I have the same proposition to offer you that was offered to Mr. Goat.
Okay...
>Look:
Mr. Cat is looking.
>alt.bacchus
>alt.base-jumping.sheep.bounce.bounce.bounce
>alt.bite-me
>alt.cloned-sheep.bah.bah.bah
>alt.conspiracy.yak.worshippers
>alt.dev.null
>alt.dont.get.even.get.odd
>alt.duck
>alt.duck.quack.quack.quack
>alt.fun.with.steve
>alt.funnytown
>alt.look.at.me.i.am.a.fish
>alt.moose.rights
>alt.smoking.mooses
>alt.support.nutty.as.a.fruitcake
>alt.talk.hypothetical
>alt.thinking.hurts
>alt.whine
>alt.worldsaway
>alt.year
>alt.year.1976
Are they all real newgroups? Anyway, I don't have time to post on all them.
I'm quite happy with the 3 that I post to.
>NOTHING about cats!!!!!!!
AARRGGHH!!!!
>This is blatantly unfair to cats everywhere!!!!!!
Yeah! We want cats!! We want cats!!
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>Can we drop the "thinking" bit and get back to the "hot sex" thread.
>The two things are not synonomous. Like "prithee" and "praeter".
Or like "Nimby" and "Nimby" - two words that are spelled exactly the same
(even with the same letters!), yet sound completely different, and mean
entirely different things.
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>This is why so many people are dissatidfied with their sex life. They
>underestimate the importance of the thinking aspect of sex.
Just like The Great Nimby said, "Nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby
nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby
nimby", which roughly translates to, "Imagination is more important than
genital stimulation when it comes to imagining genital stimulation."
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
<7m5hok$epu$3...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>...
>The thinking part of sex?? I'm quite into the thinking part...
>unfortunately I don't seem to be getting much of the other part at the
>mo...
Can I be of assistance?
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>Life is like a box of chocolates, it melts if you leave it out too
>long...
Yeah, like my brain.
>Life is the development of a corpse.
Make up your mind...
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
<3784f655...@news.clara.net>...
>> > > "Ed the cat" <ed_cat_98@*NO_SPAM_PLEASE*yahoo.com> typed the
following > > >
>> Ali Hassan wrote in message <3783A5CC...@hotmail.com>...
>> >you think?
>>
>> I think so, or maybe I think I do...
>>
>
>Shut up! I'm in PPPPAAAAIIIIIINNNN!!!!
Or maybe you just think you are in pain, or think you thought you felt pain?
(Ed runs away, trying to escape being hit by Sara)
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>folks, for the sake of the few who arent aware of me and my incredible
>story - yes, the rumors you may have heard are true... i did invent
>thinking... it was in 1812... and i am recounting the details for your
>delectation throughout usenet...
And what a horrible thing it was to inflict on us all! I wish I didn't have
to think all the time. At least it would prevent my suicidal thoughts. I
mean, if I wasn't concious then I could just walk round doing things and not
be aware of it. That way, I wouldn't have to suffer the pain of a life full
of self awareness and all my family and friends would be happy because I'd
still be here.
>what this means in practical terms is that we can all relax, stretch
>out and start mumbling inanely. forget about the thinking -
>everythings going to be alllllllll wrong.
Yeah, everything's going to be all wobbly and upside down. I mean, someone
keeps telling me that gravity holds us here...well then why do I keep
floating away??? Also, I always thought things only floated in the upper
blue stuff if they were planes, birds or aliens, and now I'm up here too,
scatching my head, wondering how to get back down. BUT, I have a plan you
see!!... The next time one of those swirly pink pie shaped things comes
bouncing past I'm going to hop on and hope it falls down. I just hope you're
all still here next time my feet starts to fly...
:o)
Ed the cat
Chris Canning
The All Powerful wrote:
> Chris Canning wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Can we drop the "thinking" bit and get back to the "hot sex" thread.
> > > The two things are not synonomous. Like "prithee" and "praeter".
> > >
> > > --
> > > ian
> >
> > This is why so many people are dissatidfied with their sex life. They
> > underestimate the importance of the thinking aspect of sex.
>
> The thinking part of sex?? I'm quite into the thinking part...
> unfortunately I don't seem to be getting much of the other part at the
> mo...
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Life is the development of a corpse.
Have a tee shirt printed with your thoughts on sex. It might attract a suitable
partner.
Chris
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> >ian hammond <i...@hammo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >The All Powerful <soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Cyrano wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
> >> >> > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Ed the cat wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > W**king has always be an important part of mine.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Working?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > or winking or walking or ...
> >> >>
> >> >> Just so long as it's not working...
> >> >
> >> >wicking
> >>
> >> Yup. You're just a Candle in the Wick.
> >
> >i can't stay a candle.
>
> I'd wick a million candles of one of your mandibles
your moth is showing
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> The All Powerful wrote in message
> <7m2q28$4ur$1...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>...
>
> >Life is like a box of chocolates, it melts if you leave it out too
> >long...
>
>
> Yeah, like my brain.
>
> >Life is the development of a corpse.
>
> Make up your mind...
life is like a nimby nugget.
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> Chris Canning wrote in message <378566EE...@wxs.nl>...
> >This is why so many people are dissatidfied with their sex life. They
> >underestimate the importance of the thinking aspect of sex.
>
>
> Just like The Great Nimby said, "Nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby
> nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby nimby
> nimby", which roughly translates to, "Imagination is more important than
> genital stimulation when it comes to imagining genital stimulation."
that is one smart cat!
Jane
Ed the cat wrote in message
<931453406.20550.1...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>Jane wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>>>....kinda swirly like a falling leaf...................
>>
>>
>>that was beautiful
>>*watches leaf falling in a pleasant but dazed state*
>
>
>I like beautiful things. Are you by any chance beautiful?
>
>:o)
>
>Ed the cat
>
>
>
beautiful....but not to be objectified
ever,
jane
(also likes cats)
Ed the cat
>> >help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
>>
>>
>>
>
Who are the Merkins?
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>Ed the cat wrote:
>>
>> Dave F. wrote:
>> >help me, opera has always been a wonderful part of my life
>>
>> W**king has always be an important part of mine.
>>
>>
>> Ed the cat
>
>Bad kitty. BAD!
But walking is good for a cat. It's good excercise....
hehehehe.....
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>Must make matters difficult...
That's why I've got my robotic hands
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
<1dumq8l.1px...@lax-ts1-h1-40-88.ispmodems.net>...
>The All Powerful <soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Cyrano wrote:
>>
>> > In article <7m2psq$4uq$2...@nclient3-gui.server.ntli.net>,
>> > soul_sucker_97@*GET_LOST_SPAMMER*yahoo.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Ed the cat wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > -------------
>> >
>> > or winking or walking or ...
>>
>> Just so long as it's not working...
>
>wicking
Ah-ha, now, just because there are two stars, does not nesesarily mean that
there are only two letters inbetween.
It could be:
Wobbly King
or
When are snails going to stop fucking
When am I going to be King
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
Leo Sgouros wrote in message ...
>wanking
SHOCK! HORROR!
How can you say such a word???!!!!
:o)
Ed the cat
Ed the cat
>> > >
>> > > Just so long as it's not working...
>> >
>> > wicking
>>
>
>that's right, Nick, keep it in the kitchen.
What???? Wanking in the kitchen?!!! What a place to do it!!!!!
:o)
Ed the cat