PATRICK HUMPHREY - LOONEYTARIAN STALKER
Rack Jite
Synopsis of a Stalker
--Patrick L. 'a grandfather to be -- and any congratulations from a
sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos will be returned with a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit
to Austin :-) Humphrey
Sad, but true...but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month -- if I'm out at
night, just look for anyone peeking into windows...
--Patrick L. Humphrey
No, it's more like you're in your own little world out there in the
Houston suburbs.
--Patrick L. "17 days and pedaling" Humphrey
It figures a foreigner like you couldn't.... Personally, I'd just as
soon you go back to whatever underprivileged neighborhood in the U.S.
you got booted out of -- the farther away from Texas, the better.
That is _my_ opinion.
--Patrick L. and it can be yours, but it'll cost ya big time Humphrey
I've pedaled by his house three or four times, and one time, just by
dumb luck, he and his family happened to be outside. It's fun to
mention that later and watch him foam at the mouth, if you ask me.
--Patrick L. Humphrey
Thanks to a gutless bastard in the Houston suburbs named David F.
Dahlman, you mean. And I never claimed there was a tire swing in your
front yard, liar. Your _neighbor's_ yard, yes -- and that was
something like three years ago, too. Are you going to state that your
yard is in the same state of being cluttered now as it was three years
ago?
--Patrick L. "14 days, tick tick tick, heh heh" Humphrey
You lie like a rug, "Shawn". Pointing out that Dahlman lives across
town from me -- so what? ...I have NEVER posted the name on his
mailbox (another interesting claim, since you think his mailbox is on
the street, and it isn't -- no one's is, in that area, and in a LOT of
areas all over Houston), and I pointed out the appearance of his yard
*two years ago*, Get back to me when you can write something
original, "Shawn". Meanwhile, go cower under your bed, since I'm only
37 days away from being in the same city as you.
--Patrick L. "just thought I'd say that" Humphrey
No more than I expect you to actually make a claim in good faith --
just when have I ever posted about _hanging out_ in front of Dave's
house? You _do_have the post in question, don't you, "Shawn"? I've
pedaled by his house three or four times, and one time, just by dumb
luck, he and his family happened to be outside. It's fun to mention
that later and watch him foam at the mouth, if you ask me. (Besides,
I'm going to be pedaling by, less than five miles away, on the morning
of March 30 -- let's see how paranoid your mentor really is.)
--Patrick L. "I think I just guaranteed myself a smooth pedal down to
the Island" Humphrey
--Patrick L. "pull!" Humphrey
--PLH, I'll deal with Shawn on the 30th, heh heh heh
Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood.
--PLH, I've got a Bat Attitude.
--PLH, and people wonder why I occasionally pedal by Dahlman's house
to give him the one-finger salute...
---
I suppose I can understand the selfish callous disregard
of conservatives, it's their pride in it that passes me by.
--------------------------------------------
Conservatively Incorrect http://www.dragonfire.net/~RJ/
Patrick L. Humphrey
Wow, an attempted drive-by smearing...what's the matter, Jimbo? You left out
your <aol> Me too! </aol> tags from this "article". Don't add anything of
your own, but just quote S. Shawn and Dave -- gee, what could your motive be
for *that*?
In article <33e01b2a...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net> volt...@worldnet.att.net (Jim Kennemur) writes:
(and completely screws up the attributions, as usual -- one chevron is
Kennemur's and two are S. Shawn's. Nothing of Dahlman's is in here.)
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 05:42:44 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
[...]
>>Never once did Stilt man complain about this either. But when I fight
>>back, then Stilt man will condemn me. Prima donnas??? If you doubt
>>any of the stuff below then let me tell you what to do. Publicly
>>stick up for Rack and condemn Pat for his invasions of others privacy.
>>Bingo, he will be stalking you in no time at all.
Hey, S. Shawn...now that you're in the DFW area, you'll have to hide under
your bed again, because we're going to be up there next weekend, anyway.
I'm still entertaining a faint hope that someday you'll be able to provide a
coherent explanation of how I can stalk someone if I don't know their address
and have never seen so much as a picture of them, even though I know you run
away from that question every time I ask.
Enjoy programming your Timex Sinclair ZX-1000, though.
--PLH, six days and rolling
Patrick L Humphrey
In article <33db5d3c...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net> rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite) writes:
>Synopsis of a Stalker
[the rest, flushed -- not a single original line in it]
No one will ever accuse you of having a dull imagination, Dave.
--PLH, Dahlman's doing a halfway decent L. Ron Hubbard impression, though...
Christopher Morton
On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 05:42:44 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 01:25:52 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>Jite) wrote:
>
>Never once did Stilt man complain about this either. But when I fight
>back, then Stilt man will condemn me. Prima donnas??? If you doubt
>any of the stuff below then let me tell you what to do. Publicly
>stick up for Rack and condemn Pat for his invasions of others privacy.
>Bingo, he will be stalking you in no time at all.
Just can't avoid attacking liberals, can you Shawn.
What do you hate most about Stiltman?
That he doesn't call people "niggers" or that he just won't obey you
without question?
---
Gun control, the theory that Black people will be
better off when only Mark Fuhrman has a gun.
Christopher Morton
>Synopsis of a Stalker
Do you still consider the neo-Nazis of the National Alliance "polite"
and "honest"?
What do you find "polite" about a call to deport all Jews?
What do you find "honest" about Holocaust revisionism?
Stop scaring your kids with that shotgun.
Elizabeth Bartley
In article <33d8dbe6...@news.mindspring.com>, <*> wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 17:29:59 GMT, cm...@nwohio.com (Christopher
>Morton) wrote:
>>>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 01:25:52 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>>Jite) wrote:
>>>Synopsis of a Stalker
Chris Morton asked:
Do you still consider the neo-Nazis of the National Alliance "polite"
and "honest"?
Shawn Smith misquotes:
>>I still consider the neo-Nazis of the National Alliance "polite"
>>and "honest."
Shawn Smith says after misquoting:
>And you wonder why we dung like you.
You, sir, are pathetic lying scum.
--
From line modified to annoy spambots. Reply-to and Originator are accurate.
Do not send me unsolicited commercial email.
- E. Elizabeth Bartley | (permanent address) e-ba...@pobox.com
(current posting site) ee...@midway.uchicago.edu
Christopher Morton
On Mon, 21 Jul 1997 03:48:24 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 17:29:59 GMT, cm...@nwohio.com (Christopher
>Morton) wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 01:25:52 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>>Jite) wrote:
>>
>>>Synopsis of a Stalker
>>
>>I still consider the neo-Nazis of the National Alliance "polite"
>>and "honest."
>
>And you wonder why we dung like you.
Maybe you could get a grownup to help you fake quotes. You're not
doing very well on your own, Skinhead Shawn.
Did the Japanese-Americans have a duty to go into those racial
concentration camps?
Patrick L. Humphrey
In article <33d68b13...@news.mindspring.com> sa...@allophone.com writes:
>On Tue, 22 Jul 1997 22:19:12 GMT,
>e-ba...@snip-this-to-reply.pobox.com (Elizabeth Bartley) wrote:
>>You, sir, are pathetic lying scum.
>Wow and this after you have stuck up for me and condemned Chris' lies
>about me for the past three years. FUCK OFF. You are just a bit
>worse than Chris.
Hey, S. Shawn -- maybe she knows me a bit better than *you* do, eh? :-0
--PLH, which isn't saying much, considering we're making comparisons to
S. Shawn
Christopher Morton
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997 04:41:24 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Jul 1997 22:19:12 GMT,
>e-ba...@snip-this-to-reply.pobox.com (Elizabeth Bartley) wrote:
>
>>You, sir, are pathetic lying scum.
>
>Wow and this after you have stuck up for me and condemned Chris' lies
>about me for the past three years. FUCK OFF. You are just a bit
>worse than Chris.
We've all seen your surrender speech, Schutzstaffel Shawn.
You're done.
Run away... like you ALWAYS do.