Repost: R2-45
Rod Keller
Author: wri...@eskimo.com (Robert Vaughn Young)
Date: 8 Mar 1998 20:53:54 GMT
John Stirling Walker (Geistes...@webtv.net) wrote:
: Dear Sloth,
: It doesn't make sense in that context only if you are already biased
: towards believing LRH to have meant real harm towards anyone!
Well, let's not be biased! Let's get on source and see what LRH says!
Start with the famed "Bolivar PL" (HCOPL 12 Feb 67 "The REsponsibilities
of Leaders") where L. Ron gives 7 things about power (often applied now as
a "power formula") and so let's look at #6 and remember that LRH is the
actual model here for "the power":
"When you're close to power, get some delegated to you - enough
to do yuour job and protect yourself and your interests - for you
can be shot, fellow, shot, as the position near power is
delicious but dangerous, dangerous always, open to the taunts
of any enemy of the power who dare not really boot the power
but can boot you. So to live at all in the shadow or employ of
a power, you must yourself gather and USE enough power to hold
your own - without just nattering to the power to "kill Pete,"
in straightforward or more suppressive veiled ways to him as
these wreck the power that supports yuours. He doesn't have
to know all the bad news and if he's a power really he won't
ask all the time, "Waht are all those dead bodies doing at
the door?" And if you are clever, you never let it be
thought HE killed them - that weakens you and also hurts
the power source. "Well, boss, about all those dead bodies,
nobody at all will suppose you did it. *She* over there,
those pink legs sticking out, didn't like me." "Well,"
he'll say if he really is a power, "why are you bother me
with it if it's done and you did it. Where's my blue ink?"
Or "Skipper, three shore patrolmen will be along soon with
your cook, Dober, and they'll want to tell you he beat up
Simson." "Who's Simson?" "He's a clerk in the enemy office
downtown." "Good, when they've done it, take Dober down
to the dispensary for anyt treatment he needs. Oh, yes.
Raise his pay."
What this clearly fits into is the Fair Game doctrine that there is
nothing wrong with anything done to an "enemy" or "suppressive person"
just as the Nazis taught there is no crime that can be committed against
Jews. In fact, Hubbard even says, one commends and raises the pay of
someone who commits such crimes.
Or is this "bias"?
--
*----------------------------------------------*
Robert Vaughn Young * The most potent weapon of the oppressor is *
wri...@eskimo.com * the mind of the oppressed. - Steve Biko *
Rod Keller
POWER OF A MUNICIPALITY TO REGULATE ORGANIZATIONS CLAIMING TAX EXEMPT OR
NON-PROFIT STATUS" includes this passage:
++++
"R2-45"
Despite the general exposure of many Scientology practice
policies and attacks in the media over the past several years,
resulting primarily from the F.B.I. 's seizure of documents
fro Scientology headquarters, there exists in Hubbard's twisted
mind and writings a little known policy called "R2-45" [garbled]
in the book, "The Creation of Human Ability - A Handbook of Scientology"
written by Hubbard and distributed by the Church of Scientology
of California, the following quote appears:
"R2-45 - an enormously effective process for exteriorization,
but its use is frowned upon by this society at this time."
"Exteriorization", in Scientology policy is death. The policy
refers to shooting a person in the head. In a short internal
Scientology memorandum called "Racket Exposed", Hubbard attacks
a number of individuals, subjects them to the "Fair Game" doctrine,
and states as follows:
"Any Sea Organization member contacting any of them is to use
auditing process R2-45"
It is unknown to the authors of this Report whether the process
was used on those individuals.
During a meeting of Scientologists in Phoenix, Arizona,
in 1954, Hubbard demonstrated the R2-45 auditing process by
firing a shot into the floor during the middle of the meeting.
There is some evidence to suggest that between 1975 and 1977,
during the F.B.I. investigation of Scientology, meetings of
Scientology executives were held in which there were discussion
relative to auditing high level F.B.I. members with auditing
process R2-45.
++++
In the book "Religion Inc." (Stuart Lamont, 1986) it says:
++++
However, in 1952 the phoenix had yet to arise from the ashes of the
HDRF in Wichita. Hubbard took himself off literally to the town of
Phoenix, Arizona, and opened a centre there in March 1952. He trav-
elled in September of that year to England to lecture in London and
returned again in January to find interest in his theories increasing. In
between these visits he delivered the famous Philadelphia Doctorate
Lectures (1-19 December 1952). These are still for sale on cassette by
the Church of Scientology at over $2000 for the set and include
Hubbard's notorious reference to the R2-45 process for exteriorisation.
In plain language, it means that someone can be released from their
body by shooting them with a Colt '45, which Ron proceeded to
demonstrate by firing a revolver into the floor of the podium.
++++
In the L.A. Times, August 28, 1978 by Robert Rawitch and Robert Gillette
it says:
++++
Scientology Critics Assail Aggressiveness of Church
"If anyone is getting industrious trying to enturbulate (sic) or stop
Scientology or its activities, I can make Captain Bligh look like a
Sunday-school teacher. There is probably no limit on what I would do to
safeguard Man's only road to freedom against persons who ... seek to stop
Scientology or hurt Scientologists." -- L. Ron Hubbard, Aug. 15, 1967
[...]
Equally misunderstood, the church contends, is a controversial Hubbard
dictum label "R2-45," which the church's enigmatic founder never has
chosen to elaborate. The dictum comes from Hubbard's book "The Creation
of Human Ability" and reads: "R2-45: An enormously effective process for
exteriorization but its use is frowned upon by this society at this time."
Exteriorization, in Scientology terminology, is the ability of the mind,
or "thetan" to physically leave the body.
A number of former Scientologists who are now critics of the church assert
that R2-45 is meant to authorize killing its antagonists with a
.45-calibre pistol.
Church spokesman Jeffrey Dubron, of the principal American Church of
Scientology in Los Angeles, says "it was only a joke."
There is no evidence that R2-45 has ever been carried out, nor is there
any indication Scientologists have ever, as a matter of policy, physically
harmed anyone.
There is, however, abundant evidence that the church has sought -- and to
a significant extent succeeded -- to suppress criticism of Scientology, in
part by simply promulgating policies such as fair game and R2-45 and also
by the church's quickness to file civil and even criminal charges against
its critics.
Rod Keller
To: Those Concerned No. 30 INT
E/O No. 28 INT added to
From: The Founder
Subject: RACKET EXPOSED 6th March 1968
(BPI and goes in Auditor)
POLLY STATHIS
PETER GOODWIN
JIM STATHIS
PETER KNIGHT
MRS. KNIGHT
NORA GOODWIN
RON FROST
MARGARET FROST
NINA COLLINGWOOD
FREDA GAIMAN
FRANK MANLEY
MARY ANN TAYLOR
GEORGE WATERIDGE
are hereby declared Suppressive Persons for pretending to have and
distribute forged and altered "Upper Level Materials" which were of a
Research nature and not for distribution.
All Certificates and Awards are cancelled.
1. Having stolen or illegally procured these dangerous materials (at
the instigation of a Psychiatrist) these persons did plot to misuse
them to cause Insanity and Death.
2. False report for money that they would furnish the real materials.
3. They are declared Enemies of mankind, the planet and all life.
4. They are fair game.
5. No amnesty may ever cover them.
6. If they ever come to a Qual Division they are to be run on reverse
processes.
7. Any Sea Org member contacting any of them is to use Auditing Process
R2-45.
8. The Criminals Prosecution Bureau is to find any and all crimes in
their pasts and have them brought to court and prison.
The Public Distribution of False or Forbidden or Dangerous Data is a
Suppressive Act and a High Crime.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LR1467
> Or is this "bias"?
Looks like literal interpretation taken out of context to"prove" a bias.
LR
norman_suchanek
Maybe it looks like that at the 1st glance.
But what about the 'guardian office' activities, their orders,
osa actions, RPF's RPF, WISE protecting criminality etc. etc. ?
Norman
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own