Google グループは Usenet の新規の投稿と購読のサポートを終了しました。過去のコンテンツは引き続き閲覧できます。
表示しない

Benjo kami?

閲覧: 7 回
最初の未読メッセージにスキップ

Louise Bremner

未読、
2003/10/30 22:39:182003/10/30
To:
<http://www.paulnoll.com/Korea/History/money-Japan-50.html>

Question: If it was, in fact, called that, was it ever used as such?

________________________________________________________________________
Louise Bremner (log at gol dot com)
If you want a reply by e-mail, don't write to my Yahoo address!

Reg. Blank

未読、
2003/10/30 23:51:252003/10/30
To:
Louise Bremner wrote:
> <http://www.paulnoll.com/Korea/History/money-Japan-50.html>
>
> Question: If it was, in fact, called that, was it ever used as such?

Does that say "Year 2598 A.D." on the front? If so, is that the
Japanese A.D.?

Reg.

Louise Bremner

未読、
2003/10/31 0:48:552003/10/31
To:
Reg. Blank <spamb...@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:

Good grief--so it does.

But it also says "Showa 13" down the other edge. Does *kigen* always
mean "AD"? (Is Jimmu assumed to have become emperor in 660 BC? In which
case, 1938 + 660 = 2598?)

(Thinks: Was money printed in 1938 still around during the Korean War?
Does banknote paper last that well?)

Scott Reynolds

未読、
2003/10/31 2:32:092003/10/31
To:
On 10/31/2003 2:48 PM, Louise Bremner wrote:

> Reg. Blank <spamb...@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>
>
>>><http://www.paulnoll.com/Korea/History/money-Japan-50.html>
>>>
>>>Question: If it was, in fact, called that, was it ever used as such?
>>
>>Does that say "Year 2598 A.D." on the front? If so, is that the
>>Japanese A.D.?
>
>
> Good grief--so it does.
>
> But it also says "Showa 13" down the other edge. Does *kigen* always
> mean "AD"? (Is Jimmu assumed to have become emperor in 660 BC? In which
> case, 1938 + 660 = 2598?)
>
> (Thinks: Was money printed in 1938 still around during the Korean War?
> Does banknote paper last that well?)

I suppose that depends on how many times you use it as benjo-kami.

--
_______________________________________________________________
Scott Reynolds s...@gol.com

新着メール 0 件