A Sudden Shock on Sunday Morning
Rob Kelly
Saturday morning TV show, that shows Neon Genesis Evangelion and Martian
Sucessor Nadesico at around 10 in the morning. Last week, I saw an upskirt
shot from Adventure Kid when it was plugged, now I've beared witness to what
could be a Great Moment of Ayanami History.
This week, it was episode five (Rei, Beeyond Her Heart), and the scene where
Shinji goes over to Rei's apartment to give her her NERV ID card. I see
Shinji find a pair of specs on her desk, and him try and put it on....
And him turn around to see Rei wearing only a towel. The scene must have
been shown untouched, if not slightly cut. They even had a shot of Shinji's
hand on Rei's breast! This was somewhere at around 9am, when little children
would be watching the show.
Somehow, I have a nasty thought of the Daily Mail, and religuos right and
overbearing parents going to be slavering for blood over this... And what
will happen later on in the series...
--
Rob Kelly
Current Favourites | Current Quote
J-Rock Band: Dir en Grey | I don't want to become Edward H. Gein
Anime: Nadesico | [Dir en Grey - "JESSICA"]
Game: ESP Ra.De. | Sid Vicious & Nancy, where can I meet you?
Disaster
> I caught a repeat of Evangelion on Saiko Exciting, the Sci-Fi channel's
> Saturday morning TV show, that shows Neon Genesis Evangelion and Martian
> Sucessor Nadesico at around 10 in the morning. Last week, I saw an
upskirt
> shot from Adventure Kid when it was plugged, now I've beared witness to
what
> could be a Great Moment of Ayanami History.
>
> This week, it was episode five (Rei, Beeyond Her Heart), and the scene
where
> Shinji goes over to Rei's apartment to give her her NERV ID card. I see
> Shinji find a pair of specs on her desk, and him try and put it on....
>
> And him turn around to see Rei wearing only a towel. The scene must have
> been shown untouched, if not slightly cut. They even had a shot of
Shinji's
> hand on Rei's breast! This was somewhere at around 9am, when little
children
> would be watching the show.
>
> Somehow, I have a nasty thought of the Daily Mail, and religuos right
and
> overbearing parents going to be slavering for blood over this... And
what
> will happen later on in the series...
LMAO
That would be fun to see!
--
Carpe Jugulum
Disaster
Disaster's Fan Fiction - http://www.disfanfic.net
DSE - For the Public - http://www.disfanfic.net/DSE
JAE FAQ - http://www.evafaq.com
Pen^3's JAE FAQ - http://faq.pen3.cjb.net
Convention Reports - http://www.disfanfic.net/conventions
Zeruel333 The Hentai One
Just think of what would happen if they showed End of Evangelion uneditted (and
they might too; they showed Vampire Hunter D almost completely uncensored (even
had the 'open bathrobe' scene with the girl :)
---
"OH, MY GOD!! SOMEBODY PUT SHIT IN MY PANTS!!!!!!!"
JHousequake
news:3d4d0...@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> I caught a repeat of Evangelion on Saiko Exciting, the Sci-Fi channel's
> Saturday morning TV show, that shows Neon Genesis Evangelion and Martian
> Sucessor Nadesico at around 10 in the morning. Last week, I saw an upskirt
> shot from Adventure Kid when it was plugged, now I've beared witness to
what
> could be a Great Moment of Ayanami History.
>
> This week, it was episode five (Rei, Beeyond Her Heart), and the scene
where
> Shinji goes over to Rei's apartment to give her her NERV ID card. I see
> Shinji find a pair of specs on her desk, and him try and put it on....
>
> And him turn around to see Rei wearing only a towel. The scene must have
> been shown untouched, if not slightly cut. They even had a shot of
Shinji's
> hand on Rei's breast! This was somewhere at around 9am, when little
children
> would be watching the show.
>
> Somehow, I have a nasty thought of the Daily Mail, and religuos right and
> overbearing parents going to be slavering for blood over this... And what
> will happen later on in the series...
>
> --
> Rob Kelly
Yeah, so? It was cable wasn't it? I thought lack of censorship on cable was
well-known, and a plus!
esper41
> Saturday morning TV show, that shows Neon Genesis Evangelion and Martian
> Sucessor Nadesico at around 10 in the morning. Last week, I saw an upskirt
> shot from Adventure Kid when it was plugged, now I've beared witness to what
> could be a Great Moment of Ayanami History.
>
> This week, it was episode five (Rei, Beeyond Her Heart), and the scene where
> Shinji goes over to Rei's apartment to give her her NERV ID card. I see
> Shinji find a pair of specs on her desk, and him try and put it on....
>
> And him turn around to see Rei wearing only a towel. The scene must have
> been shown untouched, if not slightly cut. They even had a shot of Shinji's
> hand on Rei's breast! This was somewhere at around 9am, when little children
> would be watching the show.
>
> Somehow, I have a nasty thought of the Daily Mail, and religuos right and
> overbearing parents going to be slavering for blood over this... And what
> will happen later on in the series...
Well apperently they may have to cut those episodes that earned a '12'
rating (I can't remember which ones) but when shown during the
Thursday night anime slot it should remain untouched. Also, in case
you didn't know, this week's OAV is gonna be Gunbuster (first three
eps this week, last three next) AND the first five eps of Eva and
Nadesico are being repeated this Monday-Friday at 11:30, and then
again at 15:00.
esper41
Keep in mind that this is the UK Sci-fi channel (the US one has
stopped showing anime, I believe), and TV censorship is handled
slightly differently over here.
Disaster
> Just think of what would happen if they showed End of Evangelion
uneditted (and
> they might too; they showed Vampire Hunter D almost completely
uncensored (even
> had the 'open bathrobe' scene with the girl :)
Somehow that just doesn't impress me.
Disaster
> Zeruel333 The Hentai One wrote:
> > then they showed Casshan Robot Hunter on saturday morning which had a
scene
> > showing a girl's nipple-less tit ("hey kids! Wake up early and we'll
give you
> > something to beat off to!")
>
> ...but what if they don't have a drum?
Or a brother?
Disaster
> madness in NGE. It's not really suited for kids that will say "OMG! He
> grabbed her boobie!" It's a very crucial (well, ok... not _THAT_
> crucial) character element that is magnified later in the series.
>
> Personally, I found that scene shocking (only because I didn't expect
> it). However, you'll come to find out later that there was a reason
> for all of that madness. Would you stop reading a novel because your 6
> year old son saw a picture of a naked woman on the page you were
> reading (typical in fantasy novels)? I don't think so. You would just
> explain that it wasn't his time to understand it now, and that he must
> not trouble himself with trying to understand. Just remember that it's
> not the rap music that makes the kids do stupid shit, but the fact
> that parents don't discuss how to deal with life with their kids. The
> more honest you are about topics, the more confidence your children
> will have in you, and the less likely they are to do something stupid.
Rap music? Kids? You're dad just had a big long talk with you didn't he!?
:P
Disaster
> Tessai <Tes...@cryogen.com> wrote:
> > Personally, I found that scene shocking (only because I didn't expect
> > it). However, you'll come to find out later that there was a reason
> > for all of that madness. Would you stop reading a novel because your 6
> > year old son saw a picture of a naked woman on the page you were
> > reading (typical in fantasy novels)? I don't think so. You would just
> > explain that it wasn't his time to understand it now, and that he must
> > not trouble himself with trying to understand. Just remember that it's
> > not the rap music that makes the kids do stupid shit, but the fact
> > that parents don't discuss how to deal with life with their kids. The
> > more honest you are about topics, the more confidence your children
> > will have in you, and the less likely they are to do something stupid.
>
> that's exactly right! Parents need to talk with their kids instead of at
> them. And NGE is proof of that! Think Shinji would be as screwed up as
he is
> if Gendo talked with him? Parenting IS important.
Rubbish. Kids of the general age group we are talking about here really
have nothing to bring to the table. That's why it's there job to shut up
and do nothing but listen and obey. Wish I had known this from the start.
If I knew then what I know now then my life would have been a lot easier.
I could have closed my trap and stucked up all the knowledge I could.
Unfortunately, I can't take my pittiful 24 years and give it to myself
from the ages of 1 to 23.
esper41
Adults can be fuckwits too, you know.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.net> wrote:
> > Rubbish. Kids of the general age group we are talking about here
really
> > have nothing to bring to the table. That's why it's there job to shut
up
> > and do nothing but listen and obey. Wish I had known this from the
start.
> > If I knew then what I know now then my life would have been a lot
easier.
> > I could have closed my trap and stucked up all the knowledge I could.
> > Unfortunately, I can't take my pittiful 24 years and give it to myself
> > from the ages of 1 to 23.
>
> Adults can be fuckwits too, you know.
So what? That's totally beside the point and for these matters
unimportant. Obviously we are not talking about Adults, we are talking
about kids. Don't change the subject.
esper41
> "esper41" <esp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.net> wrote:
> > > Rubbish. Kids of the general age group we are talking about here
> really
> > > have nothing to bring to the table. That's why it's there job to shut
> up
> > > and do nothing but listen and obey. Wish I had known this from the
> start.
> > > If I knew then what I know now then my life would have been a lot
> easier.
> > > I could have closed my trap and stucked up all the knowledge I could.
> > > Unfortunately, I can't take my pittiful 24 years and give it to myself
> > > from the ages of 1 to 23.
> >
> > Adults can be fuckwits too, you know.
>
> So what? That's totally beside the point and for these matters
> unimportant. Obviously we are not talking about Adults, we are talking
> about kids. Don't change the subject.
Your post implied that you belive adults to be superior to children,
and I was merely arguing that that is not always the case - by the
same token, if you look hard enough you will find an 8-year-old
smarter than you and me put together.
Disaster
Superior is not the right term. We are all equal as humans go. However an
adult will always be smarter then a child, more experienced and so forth.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm sure this rule has it's exception. For example
someone who has abused alcohol for years and as a result has suffer
several strokes will most likely have a severally reduce mental capacity.
But don't sit there an suggest that I have implied something I have not!
Your use of the term superior is an ugly attempt to twist my words into
something that looks like unjustified bias.
No 8 year old has the life experience of myself, let alone you and me put
together. There is no point in having huge intelligence if you don't know
how or why to use it.
esper41
> "esper41" <esp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.net> wrote:
> > > So what? That's totally beside the point and for these matters
> > > unimportant. Obviously we are not talking about Adults, we are talking
> > > about kids. Don't change the subject.
> >
> > Your post implied that you belive adults to be superior to children,
> > and I was merely arguing that that is not always the case - by the
> > same token, if you look hard enough you will find an 8-year-old
> > smarter than you and me put together.
>
> Superior is not the right term. We are all equal as humans go. However an
> adult will always be smarter then a child, more experienced and so forth.
> Now don't get me wrong, I'm sure this rule has it's exception. For example
> someone who has abused alcohol for years and as a result has suffer
> several strokes will most likely have a severally reduce mental capacity.
>
> But don't sit there an suggest that I have implied something I have not!
> Your use of the term superior is an ugly attempt to twist my words into
> something that looks like unjustified bias.
>
> No 8 year old has the life experience of myself, let alone you and me put
> together. There is no point in having huge intelligence if you don't know
> how or why to use it.
I'm sorry if I misinterpreted your post, and I certainly didn't mean
to offend you as much as I seem to have done - perhaps we should just
agree to disagree on this, I don't want to makean enemy of you.
Disaster
How old are you?
esper41
A lady never tells. Unfortunately I'm a guy, so you've put me in a
rather awkward position -do I lie, tell the truth or simply refuse to
answer? All three options have different positive and negative
results (if I say I'm young I risk my credibility, yet I earn the
chance to prove my point by trying to write intelligent, well
thought-out posts from now on; if I say I'm older, I am more likely to
be considered an equal, yet I lose the afformentioned oppertunity; and
if I decline toindicate either way, I get myself out of thisrather
sticky situation, yet you are almostguaranteed to decide one way or
another for yourself), so I have to ask, Disaster, do you really care?
Disaster
Well, I have made several observations in your reply. First your attempt
to dodge a loaded question is admirable but the positives you have listed
are all vulnerable as well. A youngling who writes an intelligent post can
be accused of acquiring assistance, if you are of equal or greater age
then you would have agreed with me long ago, refusing to answer is as good
as admitting guilt. This is not court by the way so don't bother quote
laws. Bottom line is the answer I will respect is an honest one and as I
have already made up my mind as to your rough age I would like to
compliment you on your relative maturity. I won't point out that you
forgot to use a spell checker and that some of your words are missing
spaces.
Now to your question, meant to throw me off track. Do I care? Hmmm, well
yes I do. Otherwise I would not have asked. You see your answer gives me
fuel to fire my side of the argument. Thus I do care to hear you answer
because it is to my benefit in proving that the young will never outthink
the old.
Thanks for not answering. It gave me the opportunity to answer for you.
esper41
eep. I just expected you to say 'no' - you're smarter than I thought.
You seem to have already worked it out (so you will no doubt accuse
me of only answering because it makes little difference now, and you
may be right) but I'm 15. I would like to say that I still stand by
my beliefs; I agree that - as a collective - the young could never
out-think the old, but I firmly believe that some individuals can
break free of the restrictions that age places upon them - I'm not one
of them, but I'm not black either and I still think that the Klu Klux
Klan have some pretty fucked up ideas. Anyhoo, you've somehow managed
to make me feel even more worthless than I already knew myself to be -
so have a muffin - but for the love of god let's not continue arguing.
Disaster
> eep. I just expected you to say 'no' - you're smarter than I thought.
> You seem to have already worked it out (so you will no doubt accuse
> me of only answering because it makes little difference now, and you
> may be right) but I'm 15. I would like to say that I still stand by
> my beliefs; I agree that - as a collective - the young could never
> out-think the old, but I firmly believe that some individuals can
> break free of the restrictions that age places upon them - I'm not one
> of them, but I'm not black either and I still think that the Klu Klux
> Klan have some pretty fucked up ideas. Anyhoo, you've somehow managed
> to make me feel even more worthless than I already knew myself to be -
> so have a muffin - but for the love of god let's not continue arguing.
I'm so glad to have exceeded your expectations. (Read sarcasm)
I remember 15. So I understand why you are disagreeing with me. You don't
believe me though, but I promise you it's true. In about 5 to 8 years
you'll understand. Age is not a restriction though, it's a mark of
experience in general. As you grow you become more mature and understand
more, your mind expands and you begin to see past the limits you saw
before. This has got nothing to do with the KKK or anything that in any
way relates to them. So we'll just drop that comment.
If you feel bad about this then that's something you have to get over. I'm
betting it takes you at least 3 years. If you think I'm going to drop an
argument then you obviously think I'm more mature then I do.
Vaughn L.Porter
news:umbgg37...@corp.supernews.com...
> "esper41" <esp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > eep. I just expected you to say 'no' - you're smarter than I thought.
> > You seem to have already worked it out (so you will no doubt accuse
> > me of only answering because it makes little difference now, and you
> > may be right) but I'm 15. I would like to say that I still stand by
> > my beliefs; I agree that - as a collective - the young could never
> > out-think the old, but I firmly believe that some individuals can
> > break free of the restrictions that age places upon them - I'm not one
> > of them, but I'm not black either and I still think that the Klu Klux
> > Klan have some pretty fucked up ideas. Anyhoo, you've somehow managed
> > to make me feel even more worthless than I already knew myself to be -
> > so have a muffin - but for the love of god let's not continue arguing.
>
> I'm so glad to have exceeded your expectations. (Read sarcasm)
>
> I remember 15. So I understand why you are disagreeing with me. You don't
> believe me though, but I promise you it's true. In about 5 to 8 years
> you'll understand. Age is not a restriction though, it's a mark of
> experience in general. As you grow you become more mature and understand
> more, your mind expands and you begin to see past the limits you saw
> before. This has got nothing to do with the KKK or anything that in any
> way relates to them. So we'll just drop that comment.
>
> If you feel bad about this then that's something you have to get over. I'm
> betting it takes you at least 3 years. If you think I'm going to drop an
> argument then you obviously think I'm more mature then I do.
Don't let Disaster get to you. He's like this to everyone, at some point or
another. Golden Rule No.1: Disaster is always right. Golden Rule No. 2:
Disaster is ALWAYS right!
.......and I still want my soul back!
Vaughn L.Porter
I can keep this up all day, y'know!
esper41
Erm... OK, thanks. I'm actually alright now, reading through his
posts again it just seems like he was using a bunch of well-hidden
insults in order to weaken my defense and thus 'win' the argument.
Rudolf Polzer
[...]
> .......and I still want my soul back!
Somehow this reminds me of Cato:
Ceterum censeo animam Vaughni esse reddendam.
(you would say
Ceterum censeo animam meam esse reddendam.
instead)
Try it, it already worked out for someone: Carthago really has been
destroyed. But it might take a long time, probably longer than you hope
it'll take. But I promise you: it *will* work.
--
[mpg123d] Just playing: .../MP3/hayashibara/bertemu/01 Give A Reason.mp3
Ceterum censeo animam Vaughni esse reddendam.
Disaster
Disaster
> "Vaughn L.Porter" <vau...@pcez.com> wrote:
> > Disaster <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
*Blink*
Actually with this one I think I was being mostly serious!
esper41
I didn't say that you were insulting me for the sake of insulting me,
but that you were insulting me for the sake of winning the argument;
it's rather petty to attack someone personally when the argument
itself is not a personal one, so I honestly don't give two shits
whether or not you actually meant what you were saying.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > *Blink*
> > Actually with this one I think I was being mostly serious!
>
> I didn't say that you were insulting me for the sake of insulting me,
> but that you were insulting me for the sake of winning the argument;
> it's rather petty to attack someone personally when the argument
> itself is not a personal one, so I honestly don't give two shits
> whether or not you actually meant what you were saying.
I see, I was not attacking you personally, just pointing out that your age
group is not as intelligent as mine and that mine is not as smart as the
next category up. Don't get so offended, that would be making it personal,
it's not, yer hardly a unique case.
Vaughn L.Porter
Don't make me come over there!
Vaughn L.Porter
Gimme!Gimme!Gimme!
Disaster
> Disaster <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > Yer aware that saying no is easier aren't you?
>
>
> Vaughn L.Porter
> Gimme!Gimme!Gimme!
You just got home from a 2 week trip to work! I doubt you'll be willing to
come over here!
esper41
> "esper41" <esp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > > *Blink*
> > > Actually with this one I think I was being mostly serious!
> >
> > I didn't say that you were insulting me for the sake of insulting me,
> > but that you were insulting me for the sake of winning the argument;
> > it's rather petty to attack someone personally when the argument
> > itself is not a personal one, so I honestly don't give two shits
> > whether or not you actually meant what you were saying.
>
> I see, I was not attacking you personally, just pointing out that your age
> group is not as intelligent as mine and that mine is not as smart as the
> next category up. Don't get so offended, that would be making it personal,
> it's not, yer hardly a unique case.
I wasn't talking about that - it was the subject of the whole
argument. However, as I am not representative of my entire age group,
it is pointless to attack my low intelligence; I may not be a unique
case, but plenty of people are.
Disaster
The subject is your age group, not you specifically. The fact that you
belong to age groups is beside the point. No one can be unique because if
they were then they couldn't be part of the age group. The qualifications
for being part of an age group is to be the same age. Everyone has to be
the same, otherwise they don't fit into that age group. Hence, no one is
unique. I have not attack your intelligence.
Vaughn L.Porter
> "Vaughn L.Porter" <vau...@pcez.com> wrote:
> > Disaster <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > > Yer aware that saying no is easier aren't you?
> >
> > Don't make me come over there!
> >
> > Vaughn L.Porter
> > Gimme!Gimme!Gimme!
>
> You just got home from a 2 week trip to work! I doubt you'll be willing to
> come over here!
> --
It was 2.5 weeks, I'm getting ready to head back for three MONTHS, but I
WILL come over there! Don't think I won't or can't. I have better stamina
than you might think for a 32-year old. My soul. Give. Now.
Vaughn L.Porter
My soul or your brain.
esper41
> "esper41" <esp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > > I see, I was not attacking you personally, just pointing out that your
> age
> > > group is not as intelligent as mine and that mine is not as smart as
> the
> > > next category up. Don't get so offended, that would be making it
> personal,
> > > it's not, yer hardly a unique case.
> >
> > I wasn't talking about that - it was the subject of the whole
> > argument. However, as I am not representative of my entire age group,
> > it is pointless to attack my low intelligence; I may not be a unique
> > case, but plenty of people are.
>
> The subject is your age group, not you specifically. The fact that you
> belong to age groups is beside the point. No one can be unique because if
> they were then they couldn't be part of the age group. The qualifications
> for being part of an age group is to be the same age. Everyone has to be
> the same, otherwise they don't fit into that age group. Hence, no one is
> unique. I have not attack your intelligence.
of the same age group are of different ages; I have absolutely no idea
how you came to this particular conclusion, but I was arguing that
people of the same age are unique in other aspects - including
intelligence and maturity.