From: "PL" <
P...@pandora.be>
Subject: Date: Monday, June
03, 2002 4:17 AM
Castro's Cuba bad for business
By Jerry
Haar
May 29, 2002
MIAMI -- While heated debate over the morality
and effectiveness of the U.S.
embargo on Cuba continues, scant attention has
been paid to the practical,
business dimension of the issue -- namely, that
even if the embargo on doing
business with Cuba were lifted tomorrow, the
country would remain a highly
unattractive place in which to do
business.
Lifting restrictions would not result in Fidel Castro's swapping
his copy of
Karl Marx's Das Kapital for Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations,
nor would it
inspire brother Raul, vice president and defense minister, to
seek a leave
from government to spend a year as a visiting fellow at the
Heritage
Foundation. A communist regime with all its totalitarian trappings
-- not
the free market -- will continue to determine Cuba's business
environment.
Recognizably, firms such as Archer Daniels Midland, John
Deere and Radisson
hotels eagerly await (and lobby for) the opening of the
Cuban market. But
these companies and others should recognize the serious
risks of doing
business there:
1.-. Cuba's population of 11
million is less than that of the combined cities
of Guadalajara, Mexico, and
Bogotá, Colombia, and less than Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, alone.The cost of
doing business in such a small market is far
greater than the cost of
expanding market share in the three cities
mentioned.
Moreover, Cuban
consumers are poor. Gross domestic product per capita is a
paltry $1,500 per
year, less than every Western Hemisphere nation except
Haiti.
The experience of foreign investors in Cuba is replete with horror
stories.
In 1995, when the "liberalizing" law was passed, the Cuban
government
unilaterally canceled Spanish utility company Endesa's investments
in
hotels. Mexico's Grupo Domos found itself arbitrarily slapped with
enormous
back-tax penalties, and Canada's First Key Project Technologies'
proposal to
build a $350 million power plant was stolen by the Cuban
government and
shopped around elsewhere.
THE DEBTS UNPAID:3.-.
Cuba last year devalued its currency by 18 percent and fell behind in
debt
payments of $500 million to private banks and firms in France, Spain,
Japan,
Canada, Chile and Venezuela. (This does not include the repayment
of
government trade credits to France for the last four years and the
principal
on foreign debt of $35 billion.) With export prices down in nickel,
sugar
and tobacco, along with a fall in tourism and remittances from abroad,
Cuba
will remain an economic basket case.
4.-.. Doing business in
countries that violate labor rights is not considered
good business
practice.
In Cuba, workers in foreign joint ventures are paid $400 to $500 a
month,
except that the Cuban government contracts the workers and pays them
400 to
500 pesos, or $20 a month, instead. Exploitation of child labor
is
officially tolerated, and it is commonplace to find children as young as
8
who are working.
Finally, liberalizing exports to Cuba will produce
a revenue windfall for
customs brokerages, wholesale, distribution and retail
stores -- all
government-operated. This will provide increased money for Mr.
Castro's
intelligence and security services and neighborhood vigilante
organizations,
further postponing democracy and economic freedom in
Cuba.
There are a score of countries in the Caribbean Basin that embrace
free
markets, political democracy and institutional reforms, thereby offering
far
greater opportunities than Cuba.
For example, Nicaragua, the
Dominican Republic and El Salvador, both with gross
domestic products per
capita nearly twice Cuba's, offer high-growth,
pro-business environments
where manufacturing, tourism, telecommunications
and consumer demand are
fueling economic development and employment.
The prospect of doing
business in Cuba is more attractive than the reality.
Even if communism were
to fall tomorrow, Cuba would have to create the
functioning administrative,
judicial, financial and regulatory institutions
essential for a market
economy.
In the meantime, U.S. companies in search of market expansion
and greater
profitability would be wise to look elsewhere in the hemisphere,
where
capitalism has been emerging over the last four decades rather than
where it
has been completely absent.
Jerry Haar is director of the
Inter-American Business & Labor Program at the
University of Miami's
Dante B. Fascell North-South Center and senior
research associate in the
Center for Human Resources at the Wharton School
of the University of
Pennsylvania.
http://www.sunspot.net/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.cuba29may29.story?coll=bal%2Doped%2Dheadlines