Rei Ayanami
Chris
Frank White
ch...@cwsa.com says...
>
>does anyone have any good pictures of her?
What do you consider a good picture? The internet is full of
pictures of her ranging from super-deformed and ultra-kawaii
to her looking like one of the Barbie Twins, rutting. A
little more detail on your part is necessary here...
FW
Disaster
> does anyone have any good pictures of her?
*Evil grin*
Yes! Go to my site, click on "Ayanami's Fashion" it's the first button on
the left under the title.
--
Kind regards
Disaster
Disaster's Fan Fiction - http://www.disfanfic.net
DSE - For the Public - http://www.disfanfic.net/DSE
JAE FAQ - http://www.evafaq.com
Pen^3's JAE FAQ - http://faq.pen3.cjb.net
Convention Reports - http://www.disfanfic.net/conventions
DOKool
<disa...@disfanfic.net> wrote:
>"Chris" <ch...@cwsa.com> wrote:
>> does anyone have any good pictures of her?
>
>*Evil grin*
>Yes! Go to my site, click on "Ayanami's Fashion" it's the first button on
>the left under the title.
Damn. I must say i'm by no means a Rei fanboy, but if anything could
turn me, it's that gallery.
Any chance you know of similar for Misato or Asuka? =)
-DOKool
Disaster
Unfortunately as I only ever prepared a gallery for Rei, no. I have a
friend and we compiled our galleries. After about a month of looking for
duplications we ended up with a compressed file of around 200 meg I think.
Now I know that Jpeg's don't zip up to much more then they are but that's
still a lot of pics. I think my gallery on line has around 500 images, my
collection before the virus was around 5000. Mostly NGE of course.
It was to much work to get the files off of her again and go through the
process of dup checking. Thankfully I had that gallery up before the worm
hit me. I actually forget to back them up as opposed to the stupid worm
getting them! Only thing the worm got were a few executables.
Anyhow, I now have nothing but those images! Oh and we caught the racoon
eating food on camera. Gonna scan em in soonish over the next few days and
stick em on my personal gallery.
Zeruel333 The Hentai One
*In businessman mode* if you want hentai email me and we'll talk.
---
Zeruel, who uses the fingers of his giant robot to squash people. Frankly I
think it's st-*SMISH*
Kyle Goetz
news:20020719180139...@mb-mp.aol.com...
*groan* leave it to Z to say this ^_^
52\Kyle
Disaster
> > does anyone have any good pictures of her?
>
> *In businessman mode* if you want hentai email me and we'll talk.
Can anyone say, "Desperately seeking partner in crime"?
Zeruel333 The Hentai One
>> > does anyone have any good pictures of her?
>>
>> *In businessman mode* if you want hentai email me and we'll talk.
>
>Can anyone say, "Desperately seeking partner in crime"?
<_< >_> who me? *innocent look*
Chris
"Zeruel333 The Hentai One" <zeru...@aol.comanimefan> wrote in message
news:20020719180139...@mb-mp.aol.com...
Zeruel333 The Hentai One
give me your email address and character you want to see in 'action' and I'll
send you a couple doujins
Disaster
> Zeruel333 The Hentai One <zeru...@aol.comanimefan> wrote:
> > <_< >_> who me? *innocent look*
>
> fast a 120GB harddrive goes...
Er, not that kinda crime!
Chris
"Zeruel333 The Hentai One" <zeru...@aol.comanimefan> wrote in message
news:20020721070724...@mb-mp.aol.com...
Rudolf Polzer
> rei
>
> ch...@cwsa.com
IIRC Zeruel wanted this information via mail, not in the NG... or what
does "give me" contrary to "give us" mean?
But I'm wondering why Zeruel asked for this information. That you want
to see Rei was clear from the Subject line and your mail address was in
your From: header. Probably he wanted to test if you're able to send
mail... but never mind.
The words "I'll" and "I" were not by you, so put a > in front of them.
That's not your fault, it's Microsoft's - but that does not mean it's OK
then, especially because there's help against this. Set the line width
to 132 (or whatever the maximum value is), use a fixed width font
(Lucida Console for example, Courier would do, too, but it hurts the
eyes) and wrap manually at somewhere between 70 and 80 characters
(ideally 74). Sorry, without additional tools there's no other way to
prevent this bug.
But even worse than that is your top posting. Please post under the
part you are referring to and snip the rest.
--
[mpg123d] Just playing: .../rammstein - engel (english version).mp3
So geht es über Stein und Stock,
Es f-t die Hexe, es st-t der Bock.
Kyle Goetz
news:200720021646418791%Fushi_Ryu@_NOSPAM_Hotmail.Com...
> In article <20020720064319...@mb-cn.aol.com>, Zeruel333 The
> Hentai One <zeru...@aol.comanimefan> wrote:
>
> > >"Zeruel333 The Hentai One" <zeru...@aol.comanimefan> wrote:
> > >> > does anyone have any good pictures of her?
> > >>
> > >> *In businessman mode* if you want hentai email me and we'll talk.
> > >
> > >Can anyone say, "Desperately seeking partner in crime"?
> >
> > <_< >_> who me? *innocent look*
>
> fast a 120GB harddrive goes...
>
> Fushi
>
*jaw drops* ^_^;;;
tho I can't talk
52\Kyle
Disaster
> Scripsit illa aut ille Chris <ch...@cwsa.com>:
> > rei
> >
> > ch...@cwsa.com
>
> IIRC Zeruel wanted this information via mail, not in the NG... or what
> does "give me" contrary to "give us" mean?
>
> But I'm wondering why Zeruel asked for this information. That you want
> to see Rei was clear from the Subject line and your mail address was in
> your From: header. Probably he wanted to test if you're able to send
> mail... but never mind.
He's probably bragging!
> > "Zeruel333 The Hentai One" <zeru...@aol.comanimefan> wrote:
> > > >ok...send me some
> > >
> > > give me your email address and character you want to see in 'action'
and
> > I'll
> > > send you a couple doujins
> > > ---
> > > Zeruel, who uses the fingers of his giant robot to squash people.
Frankly
> > I
> > > think it's st-*SMISH*
>
> The words "I'll" and "I" were not by you, so put a > in front of them.
> That's not your fault, it's Microsoft's - but that does not mean it's OK
> then, especially because there's help against this. Set the line width
> to 132 (or whatever the maximum value is), use a fixed width font
> (Lucida Console for example, Courier would do, too, but it hurts the
> eyes) and wrap manually at somewhere between 70 and 80 characters
> (ideally 74). Sorry, without additional tools there's no other way to
> prevent this bug.
Ignore this everyone! It's not JAE policy to screw around with these
settings, they are your own choice.
> But even worse than that is your top posting. Please post under the
> part you are referring to and snip the rest.
Oh like you can talk! This very post has you commiting that very fraud!
Look above, See the ID tag for Zeruel. You've got text over that, this is
a primary example of top posting.
Richard Liang
>>ok...send me some
>>
>>
>
>give me your email address and character you want to see in 'action' and I'll
>send you a couple doujins
>
>
What exactly is "doujinshi" anyway?
Richard
Rudolf Polzer
> Oh like you can talk! This very post has you commiting that very fraud!
> Look above, See the ID tag for Zeruel. You've got text over that, this is
> a primary example of top posting.
It isn't. I just posted *under* what I was referring to. Of course, if
there are multiple parts I am referring to, there's always a line of me
over a line of someone else.
And referring to the attribution line: Others reorder Jeopardy-style
postings to make them right. But that's the same as changing text inside
the quoting. The order of the lines is a piece of information one may
not change. One can snip parts away, but one never may reorder lines in
a quoting.
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -- WARNING: Be careful. This is a virus!!! # rm -rf /
eval($0=q{$0="\neval(\$0=q{$0});\n";for(<*.pl>){open X,">>$_";print X
$0;close X;}print''.reverse"\nsuriv lreP trohs rehtona tsuJ>RH<\n"});
####################### http://learn.to/quote #######################
Disaster
> Scripsit illa aut ille Disaster <disa...@disfanfic.net>:
> > Oh like you can talk! This very post has you commiting that very
fraud!
> > Look above, See the ID tag for Zeruel. You've got text over that, this
is
> > a primary example of top posting.
>
> It isn't. I just posted *under* what I was referring to. Of course, if
> there are multiple parts I am referring to, there's always a line of me
> over a line of someone else.
>
> And referring to the attribution line: Others reorder Jeopardy-style
> postings to make them right. But that's the same as changing text inside
> the quoting. The order of the lines is a piece of information one may
> not change. One can snip parts away, but one never may reorder lines in
> a quoting.
You see this "Rudolf Polzer" <AntiATFiel...@durchnull.de> wrote:"
that's what I am talking about! All of those in a post should be at the
top, never anywhere else unless used as an example like I have done here.
You always ensure that they always remain up there in the order in which
they should be. When someone top posts it means you gotta do a bit of copy
and pasting to get it done right. It can be a little tricky but it's
hardly anywhere near impossible to fix. This does not require you to
reorder them, yer right you never do that, but you do have to make sure
that all of the relevant ones are at the top as they are in this post.
--
Carpe Jugulum
Rudolf Polzer
> that's what I am talking about! All of those in a post should be at the
> top, never anywhere else unless used as an example like I have done here.
> You always ensure that they always remain up there in the order in which
> they should be. When someone top posts it means you gotta do a bit of copy
> and pasting to get it done right. It can be a little tricky but it's
> hardly anywhere near impossible to fix. This does not require you to
> reorder them, yer right you never do that, but you do have to make sure
> that all of the relevant ones are at the top as they are in this post.
Then I would be forced to quote the whole posting as one piece until the
precedessor's attribution line comes. That's not correct either.
There is no correct quoting of top postings except completely snipping
the quotation - this works as long as one is not referring to it.
--
[mpg123d] Just playing: .../lopster/megumi/vintage/a/09 hesitation.mp3
Desweiteren fiel mir auf, das die Kommandozeile immer statt '?' ein
Fragezeichen generierte.
[Da_David in t-online.homepage.technik; OE hat mal wieder versagt]
Disaster
> Scripsit illa aut ille Disaster <disa...@disfanfic.net>:
> > You see this "Rudolf Polzer" <AntiATFiel...@durchnull.de>
wrote:
> > that's what I am talking about! All of those in a post should be at
the
> > top, never anywhere else unless used as an example like I have done
here.
> > You always ensure that they always remain up there in the order in
which
> > they should be. When someone top posts it means you gotta do a bit of
copy
> > and pasting to get it done right. It can be a little tricky but it's
> > hardly anywhere near impossible to fix. This does not require you to
> > reorder them, yer right you never do that, but you do have to make
sure
> > that all of the relevant ones are at the top as they are in this post.
>
> Then I would be forced to quote the whole posting as one piece until the
> precedessor's attribution line comes. That's not correct either.
>
> There is no correct quoting of top postings except completely snipping
> the quotation - this works as long as one is not referring to it.
Rei 19: Actually if you are very careful you can realign the while thing
after moving the line.
--
Carpe Jugulum
Reis 01, Rei 02, Rei 03, Rei 04, Rei 05, Rei 06, Rei 07, Rei 08, Rei 09,
Rei 10, Rei 11, Rei 12, Rei 13, Rei 14, Rei 15, Rei 16, Rei 17, Rei 18,
Rei 19, Rei 20, Rei 21, Rei 22, Rei 23, Rei 24, Rei 25, Rei 26, Rei 27,
Rei 28, Rei 29, Rei 30, Rei 31, Rei 32, Rei 33, Rei 34, Rei 35, Rei 36,
Rei 37, Rei 38, Rei 39, Rei 40, Rei 41, Rei 42, Rei 43, Rei 44, Rei 45,
Rei 46, Rei 47, Rei 48, Rei 49
Rudolf Polzer
> > There is no correct quoting of top postings except completely
> > snipping the quotation - this works as long as one is not referring
> > to it.
>
> Rei 19: Actually if you are very careful you can realign the while
> thing after moving the line.
Only automatically using gqap. It works if and only if the poster uses
empty lines for separating paragraphs - which Disaster does.
I already moved part of a top posting to the top (and snipped the rest)
and the answer was that I was destroying the context - of course the
answer was also a top posting.
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -- Forget the express prospect!#Which was the original text?
use LWP'Simple;use URI'Escape;print"e> ";<STDIN>=~/(.*)/;for(en_de=>'de_en')
{get("http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr?doit=done&tt=urltext&lp=$_&urltext="
.uri_escape$1)=~/(?:d bgcolor=white|q")>(.*?)</s;print"$1 - (c)babelfish\n"}
Disaster
> Scripsit illa aut ille Disaster <disa...@disfanfic.net>:
> > "Rudolf Polzer" <AntiATFiel...@durchnull.de> wrote:
> > > There is no correct quoting of top postings except completely
> > > snipping the quotation - this works as long as one is not referring
> > > to it.
> >
> > Rei 19: Actually if you are very careful you can realign the while
> > thing after moving the line.
>
> Only automatically using gqap. It works if and only if the poster uses
> empty lines for separating paragraphs - which Disaster does.
>
> I already moved part of a top posting to the top (and snipped the rest)
> and the answer was that I was destroying the context - of course the
> answer was also a top posting.
Rei 19: *Shrugs* Well, it's not like we endorse top posting anyway. At
least not here.
--
Carpe Jugulum
Rei 01, Rei 02, Rei 03, Rei 04, Rei 05, Rei 06, Rei 07, Rei 08, Rei 09,