Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sollog's MAY DAY quake update

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Thomas S. McDonald

unread,
May 3, 2001, 2:07:18 AM5/3/01
to
(Newsgroup sci.geo.earthquakes added)

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af0...@monitor.lanset.com...
> Sollog warned in his MAY DAY Warning of a Great Quake in
the early morning
> hours of May 1st near Honiara on the isle of Guadalcanal
in the Solomon
> islands. So because today is May 2nd and there has been no
quake, why do you
> say Sollog missed? Why don't you instead believe that
today is not May 1st.
> Don't you remember the last prophecy? The quake was three
days late, but no
> one could deny that Sollog was using the Celtic Calendar,
because the quake
> hit on March 21st on the Celtic Calendar. Why do you so
quickly assume the
> gregorian calendar is being used? Haven't you learned
anything?
>
> No where in Sollog's prophecy does it say the quake would
occur on May 1st
> according to the Gregorian Calendar. The Gregorian
Calendar is not the only
> calendar still in use! I believe Sollog is using the same
calendar he did
> for the last quake, which would put this one on 3/5/1 or
153 in reverse, the
> same number for the Santana high school shootout on 5/3/1
(March 5) to honor
> Jesus! I've had this suspicion all along because that is
when the blood
> spilled after the holiday known as May Day.
>
> Furthermore, someone was mentioning how they had some kind
of mystical
> feeling a bad quake would occur early in the month of May
in a place not
> expected, maybe the third day perhaps... or 5/3 (May 3rd).
What if this man
> somehow unlocked Sollog's code and figured out that the
quake would occur
> later than May 1st on the gregorian calendar. Maybe he
figured out that
> Honiara was just a pointer to another location, one that
doesn't get a lot
> of quakes, which is why L9 attacked him and said he was
trying to cash in on
> Sollog's prediction!!!
>
> If this is the case, it looks like the quake might be in
central Colorado on
> 3/5/1 (May 3rd) on a line from Honiara to San Diego,
because after all that
> is where 2 died and 13 injured for Sollog's 3/21
prediction on 5/3/1 (March
> 5), a clear pointer to this next prediction, which was
given from 12:30 ...
> there's that 123 again and the hour of 3. Look what
happens when you add the
> extra 3 into the 2. You get 1 5 3....
>
> That day is the day of the blood, and it falls between the
3 and the 4, to
> honor the 4 seed of Sollog. It is also the 1st of May on
the Celtic
> Calendar.

Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,
I noticed that you posted to alt.prophecies.nostradamus
only, and not to the one newsgroup that might give a
scientific once-over to your rambling, scrabbling attempt to
cover your/Sollog's ass. So I am posting your pathetic
drivel to sci.geo.earthquakes to let folks in that NG have a
look, and perhaps comment on the worthiness of your screed.
I suspect that you just forgot to include the nice
geologists, in you haste to paste a fig leaf on the ignoble,
and frankly and disturbingly sexual, original prediction.
Hope the goose got away before you...well, this is a family
NG.
BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
other sock puppets...but ya, you) already claimed victory
with a small earthquake in the area of the Solomons just a
couple of days after the prediction? Don't tell me you are
going for the hat trick: missing and hitting the date,
somehow; missing and hitting the place, somehow, and missing
and hitting the magnitude, somehow?
Please don't change for me, though. In a world of
insecurity and instability, the assured failure of all your
predicitons is a rock upon which I can surely depend.
Peace,
Tom McDonald

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 3, 2001, 12:56:11 PM5/3/01
to

"Thomas S. McDonald" <ts...@wwt.net> wrote in message
news:CC6I6.1321$Gi4....@reggie.win.bright.net...
> Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,

Are you sure it wasn't someone taking the pee pee? I found it very funny. Of
course if this Leo character *was* being serious he needs some counselling
pronto.

What is funny though is that it leaves yet another door open for failure, so
we can say that Sollog failed twice heheeh.


Thomas S. McDonald

unread,
May 3, 2001, 1:51:13 PM5/3/01
to

"Sylvesterthekat" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:L4gI6.3958$O71.1...@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net...

Dear Sylvesterthekat,
Oh, I don't want the sock puppet army to get counseling.
As it is, we are guaranteed an amusing diversion within a
couple-of-days window around the date of each of Sollog's
predictions. I don't know about you, but I look forward,
not to the failure of his predictions (that's a given), but
rather to his/their rationalizing of each failure into a
success. The numerology alone is enough to break me out of
a funk.
And, if he/they _did_ go for counseling, would it be at
the individual or the group rate?
Peace,
Tom McDonald

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 3, 2001, 4:46:21 PM5/3/01
to

"Thomas S. McDonald" <ts...@wwt.net> wrote in message
news:zWgI6.1326$Gi4....@reggie.win.bright.net...

> Dear Sylvesterthekat,
> Oh, I don't want the sock puppet army to get counseling.
> As it is, we are guaranteed an amusing diversion within a
> couple-of-days window around the date of each of Sollog's
> predictions. I don't know about you, but I look forward,
> not to the failure of his predictions (that's a given), but
> rather to his/their rationalizing of each failure into a
> success. The numerology alone is enough to break me out of
> a funk.
> And, if he/they _did_ go for counseling, would it be at
> the individual or the group rate?
> Peace,
> Tom McDonald

I have to agree with you of course. They/he are very funny at times and to
watch the backpedalling and rationalisation that goes on is often a real
treat. I note that (on this newsgroup at least) we've not heard from Slobdog
or one of his minions since the window of opportunity was so narrow
(obviously he got over confident) and absolutely nothing even approximating
the predicted event has occurred so perhaps sensibly they/he have kept
quiet.

hehehehehehhe... methinks it'd have to be a group rate since even if it does
turn out to be one huge sock army it'd be like treating a multiple
personality disorder with all the oddities that would involve.

Der Coach

unread,
May 3, 2001, 8:06:39 PM5/3/01
to

"Thomas S. McDonald" wrote:

> "Sylvesterthekat" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:L4gI6.3958$O71.1...@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net...
> >
> > "Thomas S. McDonald" <ts...@wwt.net> wrote in message
> > news:CC6I6.1321$Gi4....@reggie.win.bright.net...
> > > Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,
> >
> > Are you sure it wasn't someone taking the pee pee? I found
> it very funny. Of
> > course if this Leo character *was* being serious he needs
> some counselling
> > pronto.
>
> > What is funny though is that it leaves yet another door
> open for failure, so
> > we can say that Sollog failed twice heheeh.
>
> Dear Sylvesterthekat,
> Oh, I don't want the sock puppet army to get counseling.

Nor I!
An enemy should NEVER be executed....
Keep them alive and torture them.

>
> As it is, we are guaranteed an amusing diversion within a
> couple-of-days window around the date of each of Sollog's
> predictions.

We ( the Fanatics) await with baited breath. And BTW,... Thanks for
notifying US of Soiled Logs activity.

> I don't know about you, but I look forward,
> not to the failure of his predictions (that's a given)

You Damn right!

> , but
> rather to his/their rationalizing of each failure into a
> success. The numerology alone is enough to break me out of
> a funk.

" won't you take me to... funky town??"

>
> And, if he/they _did_ go for counseling, would it be at
> the individual or the group rate?

Either way, I'm sure that SHitLog, would find a way for us taxpayers to
pay for it.

>
> Peace,
> Tom McDonald

Peace to you my brother.

Der Coach
On Holiday, and " stoned".


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:12:39 AM5/4/01
to
> Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,

I am not Sollog. Why do you think I'm Sollog? Just because I'm writing his
behalf?

> I noticed that you posted to alt.prophecies.nostradamus
> only, and not to the one newsgroup that might give a
> scientific once-over to your rambling, scrabbling attempt to
> cover your/Sollog's ass.

Since when have I posted to any group other than a.p.n.?

> So I am posting your pathetic
> drivel to sci.geo.earthquakes to let folks in that NG have a
> look, and perhaps comment on the worthiness of your screed.
> I suspect that you just forgot to include the nice
> geologists, in you haste to paste a fig leaf on the ignoble,
> and frankly and disturbingly sexual, original prediction.
> Hope the goose got away before you...well, this is a family
> NG.

Hmm... I must have missed it? Why do you think Sollog's prediction is
sexual?

> BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
> prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
> other sock puppets...but ya, you)

You are probably not the first to make this mistake. I am not Sollog. If you
bothered to check the header info stuff you might have realized that.

> already claimed victory
> with a small earthquake in the area of the Solomons just a
> couple of days after the prediction?

Do you think that is a victory? Is this what you say, or did you hear this
from someone else?

> Don't tell me you are
> going for the hat trick: missing and hitting the date,
> somehow; missing and hitting the place, somehow, and missing
> and hitting the magnitude, somehow?
> Please don't change for me, though. In a world of
> insecurity and instability, the assured failure of all your
> predicitons is a rock upon which I can surely depend.

You fool. Sollog has done to you exactly what he planned all along. Through
his "failure" (as you call it) Sollog has hardened your heart, the whole
time working for the LORD God.

> Peace,
> Tom McDonald
>


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:15:21 AM5/4/01
to
Well, well, well, so it is. It seems you were the only one keen enough to
notice that Jasper. I'll post up the calendar on a separate post as an image
file so you can see that you were right. That is the same calendar I was
using before, so why did I make such a big issue out of the 3rd instead of
the 4th? I obviously didn't mean that it would happen on the 3rd! That would
make no sense as you have shown. And tell me, seriously, is that the day the
blood spilled? It seems no one cares enough to even check their facts...

May 1st on the Celtic Calendar does fall on May 4th on the gregorian
calendar! I was masking the real day from the veiled eyes. The meaning of
"between the 3 and the 4" was the real day for anyone that wants to know the
real day. Obviously a day doesn't fall between two numbers! How can a quake
honor the 4 seed of Sollog unless it happens connected to the 4th?

You see:

1 . . . 5 . 3
. . 3 . . 4 .

You see what number is between the 3 and the 4? It is the 5! The quake will
happen on the 4 connected to the 5, or 5/4.. 54.. the secret number of
Jesus! The ancient number of Egyptian mysticism! 2 times 27!

Now you see why I used the 3rd as a mask. The double 7. Look at the numbers:

1--5 --3
/ /
3 4

We can extrapolate the 3rd seven: the triple seven.

1--5 --3 --4
/ / /
3 4 5

Now you know the real day the quake will happen.

Jasper <anon@user> wrote :
> Mr. Leo,
>
> You seem to indicate that three days after May 1st is the third, yet that
is
> only 2 days after, not three. Why do you keep saying the third and nothing
> about May 4th? Isn't that May 1st on the Celtic Calendar you had on here
> last time?
>
>
>
> @---}}--- Jasper ---{{---@

the answer guy

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:43:41 AM5/4/01
to
You just keep pushing that date back. Eventually a quake will happen
somewhere in the world and you can claim a hit.

So, so sad.

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message

news:3af2...@monitor.lanset.com...

the answer guy

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:57:51 AM5/4/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af2...@monitor.lanset.com...

Clever guy, that slopdog.

There are two surefire ways to tell if Ennis is the author of a post.

1. He uses the same epithets when insulting someone, such as fool and
faggot.

2. The post supports slopdog.


jha amin

unread,
May 4, 2001, 11:30:14 AM5/4/01
to
In article <3af2...@monitor.lanset.com>, remove says...

>You fool. Sollog has done to you exactly what he planned all along. Through
>his "failure" (as you call it) Sollog has hardened your heart, the whole
>time working for the LORD God.
>

Yep, that pretty well sums it up.
If you can't get past the prophecies it is your problem.
Sollog could care less what you may or may not think
As a matter of fact, i think he gets a kick out making waves. ;)


David Patrick

unread,
May 4, 2001, 11:29:50 AM5/4/01
to

On Fri, 4 May 2001, Leo Pheonix wrote:

> > Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,
>
> I am not Sollog. Why do you think I'm Sollog? Just because I'm writing his
> behalf?

Probably because he has a tendancy to use sockpuppets all the time and no
one else supports him. You seem to be using punctuation so you could be
genuine.

> > I noticed that you posted to alt.prophecies.nostradamus
> > only, and not to the one newsgroup that might give a
> > scientific once-over to your rambling, scrabbling attempt to
> > cover your/Sollog's ass.
>
> Since when have I posted to any group other than a.p.n.?
>
> > So I am posting your pathetic
> > drivel to sci.geo.earthquakes to let folks in that NG have a
> > look, and perhaps comment on the worthiness of your screed.
> > I suspect that you just forgot to include the nice
> > geologists, in you haste to paste a fig leaf on the ignoble,
> > and frankly and disturbingly sexual, original prediction.
> > Hope the goose got away before you...well, this is a family
> > NG.
>
> Hmm... I must have missed it? Why do you think Sollog's prediction is
> sexual?

This is from Ennis' prediction

(start quote)
Come on the FIRST OF MAY the great quake

Come the GREAT QUAKE to honor the seed of Me

COME COME COME
(end quote)

Quite childish really.

> > BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
> > prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
> > other sock puppets...but ya, you)
>
> You are probably not the first to make this mistake. I am not Sollog. If you
> bothered to check the header info stuff you might have realized that.

All his sockpuppets do tend to sound the same. I think you may be genuine.
Why you're supporting someone with such a poor predicting record I don't
know.

> > already claimed victory
> > with a small earthquake in the area of the Solomons just a
> > couple of days after the prediction?
>
> Do you think that is a victory? Is this what you say, or did you hear this
> from someone else?

It's what Ennis claimed himself. He pointed to a small quake in one of the
areas he claimed would have a massive quake on the 1st May a few days
after he made the initial prediction.

As this quote shows, his prediction is deliberately vague to the point of
meaningless

(start quote)

Come MAY DAY near the Canal of the GUADAL, shall come the great quake

Come MAY DAY near the capital of Honiara in the Isles of Solomon, shall
come the great quake

Come MAY DAY ON THE LINE from Jerusalem to Easter Island, shall come the
great quake

(end quote)

Needless to say, neither place or anywhere on this 'line' of his suffered
a quake on the day predicted.

And there is no indication it is not on the standard calender and some
indication that it is.

(start quote)
Come the first day of May in the year called 2001
(end quote)

> > Don't tell me you are
> > going for the hat trick: missing and hitting the date,
> > somehow; missing and hitting the place, somehow, and missing
> > and hitting the magnitude, somehow?
> > Please don't change for me, though. In a world of
> > insecurity and instability, the assured failure of all your
> > predicitons is a rock upon which I can surely depend.
>
> You fool. Sollog has done to you exactly what he planned all along. Through
> his "failure" (as you call it) Sollog has hardened your heart, the whole
> time working for the LORD God.

:)

Actually, most of the time he claims he is God.

Since you seem to have a hotline to Sollog, what is the point behind all
these missed and fudged quake predictions?

David Patrick

Ed Augusts

unread,
May 4, 2001, 12:42:35 PM5/4/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:

The only Biblical verse I can think about where someone's "heart is hardened"
is Pharoah's when God sent the 10 plagues upon Egypt. The plagues occurred,
despite which, Pharoah refused to let the 'Children of Israel' leave his
land. So, what is the parallel here, anyway? If Pharoah = us, and the LORD
God is working for Sollog, i.e., Moses --- then why can't Sollog get his
goddamn predictions right? Why? Because Sollog is a goose-plucking,
blood-sacrificing, demon-infested FOOL, you nit-wit! There is nothing
whatever of the LORD GOD in Sollog. If Sollog is doing anything spiritual
whatsoever, which I doubt, he is working his mischief through commerce with THE
DEVIL. How DARE YOU say Sollog is working for the LORD God when he has a
website that extols violence, murder, and rampant sexuality? Fool! Get thee
behind me, assholular sock-pocket!


Ed Augusts

unread,
May 4, 2001, 12:51:44 PM5/4/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:


> May 1st on the Celtic Calendar does fall on May 4th on the gregorian
> calendar!

Your prediction did a belly-flop so you are desperately looking for a way
out...so you introduce another "calendar".

> I was masking the real day from the veiled eyes.

You were masking it. So you ARE Sollog, despite all that whining to the
contrary in your previous letter! Are you off your meds again? If so, you
need to start taking them. You can't even get your story straight from one
post to the next!


> The meaning of
> "between the 3 and the 4" was the real day for anyone that wants to know the
> real day.

You weren't playing any post-dicting games like this on days you happened to
guess correctly.

> Obviously a day doesn't fall between two numbers! How can a quake
> honor the 4 seed of Sollog unless it happens connected to the 4th?

The whole idea of a destructive earthquake occurring to honor the seed of
Sollog is so, so, full of shit! It stinks on the surface and when you discuss
it or think about or toss it around, it stinks even more! Bury or flush this
stupid, stinking idea that Sollog is going to be honored by God with an
earthquake.

>
>
> You see:
>
> 1 . . . 5 . 3
> . . 3 . . 4 .
>
> You see what number is between the 3 and the 4? It is the 5! The quake will
> happen on the 4 connected to the 5, or 5/4.. 54.. the secret number of
> Jesus! The ancient number of Egyptian mysticism! 2 times 27!

What a bunch of bullshit! Is anybody out there going to fall for this crap?
What a turkey!

>
>
> Now you see why I used the 3rd as a mask. The double 7. Look at the numbers:
>
> 1--5 --3
> / /
> 3 4
>
> We can extrapolate the 3rd seven: the triple seven.
>
> 1--5 --3 --4
> / / /
> 3 4 5
>
> Now you know the real day the quake will happen.

Oh, yeah! Duh! I'm looking at 1-5-3-4 with a 3-4-5- under it. Yeah, that
sure tells me an exact fixed date! Ha ha ha! That's rich! Now you've left
us with a couple of sets of numbers that you can later re-interpret any way you
want to! What a con! And not even a smart con. That's quite a laugh!

Cary Kittrell

unread,
May 4, 2001, 12:35:19 PM5/4/01
to

I really don't think so. Solly can't find his way from one end of a sentence
to the other, at least not in writing; this boy writes just fine.
AND he uses using actual punctuation marks. And standard capitalization.
Plus, he's a real sweetie compared to $OLLOG -- calling you a "fool"
after a certain amount of provocation is pretty much net.standard (sad
to say), whereas SOLLOG comes out firing "MORON" and "limp-dick viagra
taking faggot" if you fail to fall down and worship Him from the get-go.

Leo strikes me more as a true believer -- Leo, are you a TOH member?

Not that it's any of my business.

=-=

Ed Augusts

unread,
May 4, 2001, 1:11:47 PM5/4/01
to

jha amin wrote:

> In article <3af2...@monitor.lanset.com>, remove says...
>
> >You fool. Sollog has done to you exactly what he planned all along. Through
> >his "failure" (as you call it) Sollog has hardened your heart, the whole
> >time working for the LORD God.
> >
>
> Yep, that pretty well sums it up.

It sums up the fact that you must be another asshole! So you believe that this
guy's prediction "failed" on purpose, to "harden your heart"? Boy, what a
jerk!

>
> If you can't get past the prophecies it is your problem.

No, if you BELIEVE the "prophecies" it is YOUR problem. I "can't get past the
prophecies" if they're incorrect prophecies and stupid glorifications of Sollog
and his seed. What do you want an earthquake to honor Sollog's seed for, you
fruit? Do you have a goose that you pluck, too? And sacrificial blood to do
mischief with? GROW UP! If you need more spirituality in your life, become
a Scientologist or a self-practicing proctologist...either is a great advance
from Sollog and his ways..

>
> Sollog could care less what you may or may not think
> As a matter of fact, i think he gets a kick out making waves. ;)

Yes, that's because he's an egocentric dweller of a singlewide trailer with a
religious complex....the desperate need to be great, aka "delusions of
grandeur". But if you are honestly one of his followers, you are not merely
sick , compulsion and delusional, as he is -- your are just VERY much a fool
for being swept up in hero worshipping a sick person.


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 4, 2001, 1:39:03 PM5/4/01
to

"Ed Augusts" <mysti...@icnetco.com> wrote in message
news:3AF2DA8D...@icnetco.com...

> > May 1st on the Celtic Calendar does fall on May 4th on the gregorian
> > calendar!
>
> Your prediction did a belly-flop so you are desperately looking for a way
> out...so you introduce another "calendar".

Just wait... he'll change the YEAR next. Expect him to pipe up in 2005.


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 4, 2001, 1:40:12 PM5/4/01
to

"Ed Augusts" <mysti...@icnetco.com> wrote in message
news:3AF2DF41...@icnetco.com...

> Yes, that's because he's an egocentric dweller of a singlewide trailer
with a
> religious complex....

Ed, there's no way this guy could fit inside a 'singlewide' if the one I saw
on the news was indeed him.


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 4, 2001, 1:37:42 PM5/4/01
to

"Ed Augusts" <mysti...@icnetco.com> wrote in message
news:3AF2D869...@icnetco.com...

How DARE YOU say Sollog is working for the LORD God when he has a
> website that extols violence, murder, and rampant sexuality? Fool! Get
thee
> behind me, assholular sock-pocket!

Ed, you get the prize for the best Phrase of the Week there (get thee behind
me, assholular sock-puppet). That made me laugh out loud.

[x postings removed so as not to attract more cranks]


jha amin

unread,
May 4, 2001, 2:37:37 PM5/4/01
to
In article <3AF2DF41...@icnetco.com>, Ed Augusts says...
>

Hmmm. Sounds like you have a lot of pent-up hostitilities there, Ed.
That can't be too healthy for you.
But if i can help you release again, don't hesitate to let me know.
Lots safer than road rage or kicking the dog.

James F. Cornwall

unread,
May 4, 2001, 3:48:34 PM5/4/01
to
Ed Augusts wrote:
>
> Yes, that's because he's an egocentric dweller of a singlewide trailer with a
> religious complex....

Wow, where d'you get a trailer with a religious complex? :-)

<MUSIC>
Oh, Lord, Wontcha Buy Me a Mercedes Benz, My Friends All Drive Porsches,
I Must make Amends....
</MUSIC>

George Black

unread,
May 4, 2001, 4:33:00 PM5/4/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af2...@monitor.lanset.com...

> Well, well, well, so it is. It seems you were the only one keen enough to
> notice that Jasper. I'll post up the calendar on a separate post as an
image
> file so you can see that you were right. That is the same calendar I was
> using before, so why did I make such a big issue out of the 3rd instead of
> the 4th? I obviously didn't mean that it would happen on the 3rd! That
would
> make no sense as you have shown. And tell me, seriously, is that the day
the
> blood spilled? It seems no one cares enough to even check their facts...
>
> May 1st on the Celtic Calendar does fall on May 4th on the gregorian
> calendar! I was masking the real day from the veiled eyes. The meaning of
> "between the 3 and the 4" was the real day for anyone that wants to know
the
> real day. Obviously a day doesn't fall between two numbers! How can a
quake
> honor the 4 seed of Sollog unless it happens connected to the 4th?
>
> You see:

Yup. Another crock of crap from a sloppy log sock puppet


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.250 / Virus Database: 123 - Release Date: 4/18/01


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 4:32:47 PM5/4/01
to
Thank you for the compliments Ms. Kittrell. And YES I am a true believer. I
am not a TOH member perhaps because I have never tried to become one, but I
have sent 2 emails to Sollog, neither of which he has returned. I have read
some of Sollog's books though, and I also run a website dedicated to the
prophecies of Sollog.

I believe this is the correct address:
http://sollog.b0x.com
(It has not been updated since the March 21st quake though.)


Cary Kittrell <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:9culo7$ced$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 4:32:49 PM5/4/01
to
David Patrick <spsp...@reading.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Leo Pheonix wrote:
>
> > > Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,
> >
> > I am not Sollog. Why do you think I'm Sollog? Just because I'm writing
his
> > behalf?
>
> Probably because he has a tendancy to use sockpuppets all the time and no
> one else supports him. You seem to be using punctuation so you could be
> genuine.

Yea, that much is understood. Am I his only fan? Maybe not. glen is a fan
too, because he sent me some email and said there were other fans.

> > Hmm... I must have missed it? Why do you think Sollog's prediction is
> > sexual?
>
> This is from Ennis' prediction
>
> (start quote)
> Come on the FIRST OF MAY the great quake
>
> Come the GREAT QUAKE to honor the seed of Me
>
> COME COME COME
> (end quote)
>
> Quite childish really.
>

Ok, well I certainly see what was meant now, but come is not so unusual. It
is what Jesus said at the end of Revelation, and we have already established
that this quake is to honor Jesus (as well as Sollog's girls).

> > > BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
> > > prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
> > > other sock puppets...but ya, you)
> >
> > You are probably not the first to make this mistake. I am not Sollog. If
you
> > bothered to check the header info stuff you might have realized that.
>
> All his sockpuppets do tend to sound the same. I think you may be genuine.
> Why you're supporting someone with such a poor predicting record I don't
> know.

If you believe I am a genuine fan, you would be right and what you believe
is not a lie. I realize that not everything Sollog has said has happened as
expected. Take for instance how he warned America would not be a nation by
the year 2001. Well, there are perhaps ways to get around just about
anything, like Houge and those other lame prophets do when their predictions
have failed, but I think we just need to see past the lies to see what is
true. Just because Sollog warned of Clinton's death and it did not come when
expected doesn't mean it isn't going to happen and fulfill the prophecy. God
works in mysterious ways. That is how I know Sollog is here to harden the
hearts of skeptics. As it is, I am working against him just by telling you
this secret.

>
> > > already claimed victory
> > > with a small earthquake in the area of the Solomons just a
> > > couple of days after the prediction?
> >
> > Do you think that is a victory? Is this what you say, or did you hear
this
> > from someone else?
>
> It's what Ennis claimed himself. He pointed to a small quake in one of the
> areas he claimed would have a massive quake on the 1st May a few days
> after he made the initial prediction.
>

Yea, I saw that too, but I didn't think it really hit the prophecy because
it was too early. I thought it was just a foreshadow and something to throw
in the face of skeptics.

> As this quote shows, his prediction is deliberately vague to the point of
> meaningless
>
> (start quote)
>
> Come MAY DAY near the Canal of the GUADAL, shall come the great quake
>
> Come MAY DAY near the capital of Honiara in the Isles of Solomon, shall
> come the great quake
>
> Come MAY DAY ON THE LINE from Jerusalem to Easter Island, shall come the
> great quake
>
> (end quote)
>

This is not vague at all. The location is one and the same: Honiara is the
capial of Solomon islands on Guadal canal island and it is on a line from
Jerusalem to Easter Island! Is that being vague about the location? But the
question is will this be a pointer or an actual location.

> Needless to say, neither place or anywhere on this 'line' of his suffered
> a quake on the day predicted.

Well, we'll see about that. I will be the first to admit if Sollog is wrong,
but today is May 4th, still to early to judge.


>
> And there is no indication it is not on the standard calender and some
> indication that it is.
>
> (start quote)
> Come the first day of May in the year called 2001
> (end quote)

There is no indication it is on the gregorian calendar as opposed to the
Celtic May 1st or another calendar.


>
> > > Don't tell me you are
> > > going for the hat trick: missing and hitting the date,
> > > somehow; missing and hitting the place, somehow, and missing
> > > and hitting the magnitude, somehow?
> > > Please don't change for me, though. In a world of
> > > insecurity and instability, the assured failure of all your
> > > predicitons is a rock upon which I can surely depend.
> >
> > You fool. Sollog has done to you exactly what he planned all along.
Through
> > his "failure" (as you call it) Sollog has hardened your heart, the whole
> > time working for the LORD God.
>
> :)
>
> Actually, most of the time he claims he is God.

Yes, he also claims he is above God (absurdity) and that we are all gods,
which is actually the same thing the bible teaches in Psalms 82:6. It is not
an unchristian idea. Sollog simply believes the nature of God resides in all
life. However, I have heard Sollog say there is a higher Supreme Being who
created the heavens and the earth.

>
> Since you seem to have a hotline to Sollog, what is the point behind all
> these missed and fudged quake predictions?
>

The point is a warning to man, because of his disbelieving and skeptical
heart. The end of the world is coming and Great Things are going to happen
that are very unusual, but man will have a hard time recognizing the signs,
instead wishing to believe they have nothing to do with God. Practically no
one will believe the Revelation of Jesus Christ is being fulfilled. The
point of Sollog is to make you wake up from your sleep, which is vainity.


> David Patrick
>


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 4:32:51 PM5/4/01
to
That is exactly it Ed! You hit it ON THE NOSE! The plagues God sent on the
Pharaoh were REAL Acts of God, but poor Pharaoh DID NOT recognize the TRUTH.
That is why he, playing the fool, even pursued Israel to the Red Sea and all
his armies drowned in the sea. Do you see how foolish they were? They even
pursued them into a sea that had been split apart by God! They were THAT
deluded! But skeptics will not believe this is true history. The point is
that Sollog hardens your hearts and you do not recognize him as a real
prophet. You don't see that Sollog's predictions are real and this will
cause you to pursue Israel (prophetically, the nations the antichrist
controls, maybe not you personally...) right into the trap God set for them.
All who come against Israel the nation will die just like Pharaoh in
Supernatural Events JUST like the Exodus. This is your warning, skeptic or
not, it will happen. In your vain heart you will say the Supernatural
phenomena never took place and you will rationalize, to your own
destruction, like this :

"Is it easier to believe that nature has gone out of her course
or that a man would tell a lie?" - Thomas Paine

Do you see what he just said? He is suggesting the Exodus was all MADE UP
and never took place! O how wrong he is! The Exodus took place all right,
but men of the lie deny it, and they deny the flood, and they deny the end
of the world is going to happen.

Yes, men do lie, both the good and the bad, but the Truth is somewhere in
between. Skeptics will say in their heart: Lack of evidence is evidence of
lack, which means that because God or miracles have not been sufficiently
proven, it is evidence that God doesn't exist! They will believe that the
evidence of lack constitutes more validity then the "make believe" in the
bible and supernatural miracles (read: lies) that are presently happening,
let alone the prophecies.

That is what life is all about. It is not about the things people do each
day of their meaningless of self-interests. Our lives do not belong to us,
but everything belongs to God. We were made to do God's Will and bring
happiness to each other!

If you will not realize the joy and love for each other is MEANINGFUL
because God gave it meaning (that is not something people can do) than you
will know the truth of why the end of the world must happen now.

Ed Augusts <mysti...@icnetco.com> wrote in message
news:3AF2D869...@icnetco.com...

> The only Biblical verse I can think about where someone's "heart is

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 4:32:53 PM5/4/01
to
Ed Augusts <mysti...@icnetco.com> wrote in message
news:3AF2DA8D...@icnetco.com...

>
>
> Leo Pheonix wrote:
>
>
> > May 1st on the Celtic Calendar does fall on May 4th on the gregorian
> > calendar!
>
> Your prediction did a belly-flop so you are desperately looking for a way
> out...so you introduce another "calendar".
>
My prediction? You mean the May 3rd thing? It is just so obvious that May
3rd could never be the real day, which would honor Jesus. The quake was to
honor Sollog's 4 girls! Thursday (May 3rd) is ruled by male energy,
Zeus/Jupiter. (based on the traditional celtic day associations.) It is also
the 26th of the Tree Month of Vine... (yea like Jesus' claim to fame) when I
already showed that the 27th is being honored, which on Friday, is the day
ruled by Venus, the serpent and female and the color green. (Hmm.. Didn't
someone say they associated a mystical feeling of an earthquake with the
color green?)

Now the Tree month of Vine is associated with the lake bird, which might be
the meaning of the sacrificial goose...
Isn't it obvious how much Celtic mythology mixed with Christianity is used
in Sollog's prophecies?

> > I was masking the real day from the veiled eyes.
>
> You were masking it. So you ARE Sollog, despite all that whining to the
> contrary in your previous letter! Are you off your meds again? If so,
you
> need to start taking them. You can't even get your story straight from
one
> post to the next!
>

No, I am not Sollog. I meant masking the real day by using the 3rd instead
of the real day the blood spilled and the real day that corresponds to the
1st on the Celtic Calendar. I suppose the secrets are out now, but not all
of them.

>
> > The meaning of
> > "between the 3 and the 4" was the real day for anyone that wants to know
the
> > real day.
>
> You weren't playing any post-dicting games like this on days you happened
to
> guess correctly.

Not me, but I know what you mean. When the expected day comes and nothing is
in the news about it, there seems to be silence from Sollog, but a lot of
time this could just be because we should not have expected it without
checking our facts.


>
> > Obviously a day doesn't fall between two numbers! How can a quake
> > honor the 4 seed of Sollog unless it happens connected to the 4th?
>
> The whole idea of a destructive earthquake occurring to honor the seed of
> Sollog is so, so, full of shit! It stinks on the surface and when you
discuss
> it or think about or toss it around, it stinks even more! Bury or flush
this
> stupid, stinking idea that Sollog is going to be honored by God with an
> earthquake.
>

Hmm... What is so bad about honoring someone with destructive events? It
seems Godlike to me. You do blaspheme Jesus' Revelation by saying it is a
stinking idea:

"Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy
apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged
you on her." [Revelation 18:20 ]

> >
> >
> > You see:
> >
> > 1 . . . 5 . 3
> > . . 3 . . 4 .
> >
> > You see what number is between the 3 and the 4? It is the 5! The quake
will
> > happen on the 4 connected to the 5, or 5/4.. 54.. the secret number of
> > Jesus! The ancient number of Egyptian mysticism! 2 times 27!
>
> What a bunch of bullshit! Is anybody out there going to fall for this
crap?
> What a turkey!
>

You think this is nonsense? Those who study these things do not need
explanation.

> >
> >
> > Now you see why I used the 3rd as a mask. The double 7. Look at the
numbers:
> >
> > 1--5 --3
> > / /
> > 3 4
> >
> > We can extrapolate the 3rd seven: the triple seven.
> >
> > 1--5 --3 --4
> > / / /
> > 3 4 5
> >
> > Now you know the real day the quake will happen.
>
> Oh, yeah! Duh! I'm looking at 1-5-3-4 with a 3-4-5- under it. Yeah,
that
> sure tells me an exact fixed date! Ha ha ha! That's rich! Now you've
left
> us with a couple of sets of numbers that you can later re-interpret any
way you
> want to! What a con! And not even a smart con. That's quite a laugh!

Yes, laugh little children! Laugh! God will hear your laughing and come down
to see what you are laughing at. And if it happens to be some poor kid who
got pushed into the mud, or maybe some prophet of His who is telling you the
truth like Jesus, what do you suppose God will do to those who are laughing?
I tell you what, it will not be good.


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 4, 2001, 5:10:01 PM5/4/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...

> My prediction? You mean the May 3rd thing? It is just so obvious that May
> 3rd could never be the real day, which would honor Jesus. The quake was to
> honor Sollog's 4 girls! Thursday (May 3rd) is ruled by male energy,
> Zeus/Jupiter. (based on the traditional celtic day associations.) It is
also
> the 26th of the Tree Month of Vine... (yea like Jesus' claim to fame) when
I
> already showed that the 27th is being honored, which on Friday, is the day
> ruled by Venus, the serpent and female and the color green. (Hmm.. Didn't
> someone say they associated a mystical feeling of an earthquake with the
> color green?)

Leo, I'm not quite sure how to take you. On the one hand you seem lucid yet
on the other you say you are a follower of Sollog. I'm not sure that the two
states of being are not mutually exclusive.

Some of the things you have said in your previous few replies on this thread
skirt so close to mocking Sollog that I was chuckling and yet in the same
breath you come out with stuff like that quoted above.

Do tell us. Why do you believe in Sollog, for want of a better word? In
plain English please and without any flowery anecdotes. And please explain
just what use a prediction is if you can't even decide which calender it's
based upon? The only use I can see is to glorify Sollog (assuming he gets it
right which thus far he hasn't) and not in any way to act as a warning that
could be of any benefit.


Moley

unread,
May 4, 2001, 5:23:16 PM5/4/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:

> Ed Augusts <mysti...@icnetco.com> wrote in message
> news:3AF2DA8D...@icnetco.com...
>

> > Your prediction did a belly-flop so you are desperately looking for a way
> > out...so you introduce another "calendar".
> >
> My prediction? You mean the May 3rd thing? It is just so obvious that May
> 3rd could never be the real day, which would honor Jesus. The quake was to
> honor Sollog's 4 girls! Thursday (May 3rd) is ruled by male energy,
> Zeus/Jupiter. (based on the traditional celtic day associations.)

Just one question Mr. Pheonix (rather than Phoenix?)....

If Sollog's predictions are now revealed to be based upon the Celtic Calendar
not the Gregorian one, does that mean that all of his previous "hits" are, in
fact, misses? If not, why the sudden change of calendar?

____________
Moley

Der Coach

unread,
May 4, 2001, 5:39:33 PM5/4/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:

> > Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,
>
> I am not Sollog. Why do you think I'm Sollog? Just because I'm writing his
> behalf?

You seem to be as illiterate as Soiled Log. Perhaps you are his wife... The
queen of Hollywood ( and Vine).

>
> >>>> Snip>>>


>
> Hmm... I must have missed it? Why do you think Sollog's prediction is
> sexual?

Because he kept repeating " come".
How's that foil head piece fitting anyway?

> > BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
> > prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
> > other sock puppets...but ya, you)
>
> You are probably not the first to make this mistake. I am not Sollog. If you
> bothered to check the header info stuff you might have realized that.

You defend sollog though. Why?
He's a liar, fraud, fool, moron, ( the list goes on and on).....

> > already claimed victory
> > with a small earthquake in the area of the Solomons just a
> > couple of days after the prediction?
>
> Do you think that is a victory?

Sollog did.

> Is this what you say, or did you hear this
> from someone else?

Uh, yes.... Sollog.

>
> >>> Snip<<<<


>
> You fool. Sollog has done to you exactly what he planned all along. Through
> his "failure" (as you call it) Sollog has hardened your heart, the whole
> time working for the LORD God.

No. You're the fool because we all know that sollog claims to be the LORD God.
Adonai
I am the I am.
Etc.
Let's face it. The only burning bush Sollog has seen it the one that gave him
the clap.


> > Peace,

And to you as well.

>
> > Tom McDonald
> >

Coach

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 4, 2001, 5:39:39 PM5/4/01
to

"Moley" <Mo...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com> wrote in message
news:3AF31D73...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com...

> If Sollog's predictions are now revealed to be based upon the Celtic
Calendar
> not the Gregorian one, does that mean that all of his previous "hits" are,
in
> fact, misses? If not, why the sudden change of calendar?

hehehehehe, good question there Moley


Der Coach

unread,
May 4, 2001, 5:42:49 PM5/4/01
to

the answer guy wrote:

> <<<<<<Snipadillio>>>>>>>>>


>
> Clever guy, that slopdog.
>
> There are two surefire ways to tell if Ennis is the author of a post.
>
> 1. He uses the same epithets when insulting someone, such as fool and
> faggot.
>
> 2. The post supports slopdog.

3. you forgot MORON. He likes that one too.
His Caps Lock button must be broken though.

" Smiles everyone. Smiles" - Mr. Rourke

Der Coach

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 4, 2001, 5:43:13 PM5/4/01
to

"Der Coach" <DerC...@GotATinFoilHat.gov> wrote in message
news:3AF32158...@GotATinFoilHat.gov...

> You seem to be as illiterate as Soiled Log. Perhaps you are his wife...
The
> queen of Hollywood ( and Vine).

That'd be Angelyne wouldn't it?

Der Coach

unread,
May 4, 2001, 5:47:38 PM5/4/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:

> Thank you for the compliments Ms. Kittrell. And YES I am a true believer. I
> am not a TOH member perhaps because I have never tried to become one, but I
> have sent 2 emails to Sollog, neither of which he has returned. I have read
> some of Sollog's books though, and I also run a website dedicated to the
> prophecies of Sollog.
>
> I believe this is the correct address:
> http://sollog.b0x.com
> (It has not been updated since the March 21st quake though.)

Even Adolph Hitler had true believers worshiping him.

" The masses will fall more easily to a great lie, than to a small one"- Mein
Kampf
I do have to admit though..... You are a lot more pleasant that SoiledLog.
:)
DC


>
>

Der Coach

unread,
May 4, 2001, 6:23:34 PM5/4/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:

> <<SnipoRaptor>>>


>
> Yea, that much is understood. Am I his only fan? Maybe not. glen is a fan
> too, because he sent me some email and said there were other fans

What Glen said is only hearsay........ Count on there being only two... You, and
" Glen ".

> <<SnipoSaurusRex>>.


>
> Ok, well I certainly see what was meant now, but come is not so unusual. It
> is what Jesus said at the end of Revelation, and we have already established
> that this quake is to honor Jesus (as well as Sollog's girls).

C'mon, " this quake is to honor his girls"???????
Oh yeah... I can see it now.....
Dateline: Heaven.
God decides that he want's to honor the offspring of a fat, burro waxing speed
freak with an earthquake.
Don't you think that, if that WAS the case, then God would put that quake right
under sollogs trailer park????
The dude was a porno peddler in AZ with his dad for crying out loud. But he was
too screwed up to take over the business.

> > > > BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
> > > > prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
> > > > other sock puppets...but ya, you)
> > >
> > > You are probably not the first to make this mistake. I am not Sollog. If
> you
> > > bothered to check the header info stuff you might have realized that.
> >
> > All his sockpuppets do tend to sound the same. I think you may be genuine.
> > Why you're supporting someone with such a poor predicting record I don't
> > know.
>
> If you believe I am a genuine fan, you would be right and what you believe
> is not a lie.

Cool. I believe you are dillusional... Here's you new foil hat...
Look out for the choppers.

> I realize that not everything Sollog has said has happened as
> expected.

Not everything!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Try VERY little skippy.

> Take for instance how he warned America would not be a nation by
> the year 2001. Well, there are perhaps ways to get around just about
> anything, like Houge and those other lame prophets do when their predictions
> have failed,

Yeah, but he's MEAN about it. Tell me. Where in the bible does Jesus get pissed
off and start belittling people? He was more of a " hell fire and brimstone"
type of guy.
The man says HE'S God. That should be enough for anyone, except maybe the
mormons. You don't live in Utah do you?
Have another sheet of foil.

> but I think

Don't hurt yourself.

> we just need to see past the lies

That's all you get from sollog though.

> to see what is
> true.

You're not related to Rev. Jim jones are you?

>

> Just because Sollog warned of Clinton's death and it did not come when
> expected doesn't mean it isn't going to happen and fulfill the prophecy.

He gave a time period.... Outside the window of time is a miss....

> God
> works in mysterious ways.

That's why sollog is still walking this earth.

> That is how I know Sollog is here to harden the
> hearts of skeptics. As it is, I am working against him just by telling you
> this secret.

Good.... Now post a picture too. We want to have some fun.

> >>>Snipopottamus>>>


> > It's what Ennis claimed himself. He pointed to a small quake in one of the
> > areas he claimed would have a massive quake on the 1st May a few days
> > after he made the initial prediction.
> >
> Yea, I saw that too, but I didn't think it really hit the prophecy because
> it was too early. I thought it was just a foreshadow and something to throw
> in the face of skeptics.

Bullshit.
And sollog is full of it. And remember.. you are what you eat...

> > As this quote shows, his prediction is deliberately vague to the point of
> > meaningless
> >
> > (start quote)
> >
> > Come MAY DAY near the Canal of the GUADAL, shall come the great quake
> >
> > Come MAY DAY near the capital of Honiara in the Isles of Solomon, shall
> > come the great quake
> >
> > Come MAY DAY ON THE LINE from Jerusalem to Easter Island, shall come the
> > great quake
> >
> > (end quote)
> >
> This is not vague at all. The location is one and the same: Honiara is the
> capial of Solomon islands on Guadal canal island

HOLD THE BOOKMOBILE a minute there skippy.....
He said " the canal of the Guadal".. NOT Guadalcanal.
That's vague.

> and it is on a line from
> Jerusalem to Easter Island! Is that being vague about the location?

Yes.

> But the
> question is will this be a pointer or an actual location.

"My sources say no."---- Magic 8-ball

> > Needless to say, neither place or anywhere on this 'line' of his suffered
> > a quake on the day predicted.
>
> Well, we'll see about that. I will be the first to admit if Sollog is wrong,
> but today is May 4th, still to early to judge.

He said the 1st. I guess May Day means in speed freak lingo.. Any day in May.
Right?
Sonny, I don't know what you are smoking, but I want a POUND OF IT.

> > And there is no indication it is not on the standard calender and some
> > indication that it is.
> >
> > (start quote)
> > Come the first day of May in the year called 2001
> > (end quote)
>
> There is no indication it is on the gregorian calendar as opposed to the
> Celtic May 1st or another calendar.

Oh shit, here we go again.
If the date doesn't work... use a different calendar that fits....
HE NEVER MENTIONED THE CELTIC CALENDAR! ( sorry for yelling).
>>>>>>Sniparoni....The San Francisco Treat>>>>>>

> > Actually, most of the time he claims he is God.
>
> Yes, he also claims he is above God (absurdity)

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are not beyond hope laddy buck!
You have realized that sollog IS absurd!!!!!!!!
Praise Jesus, the boy is not blind!!!

> and that we are all gods,

No. ONLY I AM.

> which is actually the same thing the bible teaches in Psalms 82:6. It is not
> an unchristian idea. Sollog simply believes the nature of God resides in all
> life. However, I have heard Sollog say there is a higher Supreme Being who
> created the heavens and the earth.

I am willing to bet that... Either you live in southern Idaho, or southern
Utah,..
Or went to a catholic school.

>
>
> >
> > Since you seem to have a hotline to Sollog, what is the point behind all
> > these missed and fudged quake predictions?
> >
> The point is a warning to man, because of his disbelieving and skeptical
> heart.

You feel sorry for him.
You want to feel sorry for someone... Try me... My heart is as black as coal.

> The end of the world is coming and Great Things are going to happen
> that are very unusual, but man will have a hard time recognizing the signs,
> instead wishing to believe they have nothing to do with God. Practically no
> one will believe the Revelation of Jesus Christ is being fulfilled.

Let me guess... through SOLLOG right?
Ever been to Guyana sonny?

> The
> point of Sollog

Is on his head.

> is to make you wake up from your sleep, which is vainity.

yawn.

>
>
> > David Patrick
> >

Der Coach.
Fanatic # 555-6981.
Scout/Sniper.
Rank: Lt. Col.

" Out here on the perimeter, there are no stars. Out here we is stone,
immaculate " .
Jim Morrison

Cary Kittrell

unread,
May 4, 2001, 6:06:45 PM5/4/01
to
In article <3af3...@monitor.lanset.com> "Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> writes:
<
{...}

<
<Yes, laugh little children! Laugh! God will hear your laughing and come down
<to see what you are laughing at. And if it happens to be some poor kid who
<got pushed into the mud, or maybe some prophet of His who is telling you the
<truth like Jesus, what do you suppose God will do to those who are laughing?
<I tell you what, it will not be good.

Well, it was bears last time; she-bears if I recall correctly.

Not to sure what I think of a god who would do that.


=-=

Der Coach

unread,
May 4, 2001, 6:53:12 PM5/4/01
to

Sylvesterthekat wrote:

"Eeeeeeehhhhhhhh. Could be..."--- Bugs Bunny

DC

Thomas S. McDonald

unread,
May 4, 2001, 6:53:00 PM5/4/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...


Dear Leo Pheonix,
Well, this has been enlightening. You deny being
Sollog, yet one of your responses as good as says that you
made the prediction. If the prediction is by Sollog, and it
is yours, you ipso facto are Sollog. But I am not wedded to
this. You may indeed be a fan, not the Log himself. It's
not terribly important to me.
What I would like from you, if you can, is to point me
to a website or some other writings that Sollog _did_ write,
as opposed to sites that quote him, or speak of him and his
words in the third person. So far, I haven't seen anything
like this, and I have looked at three websites so far
"about" him, not (as far as I understand) "by" him.
As far as you know, does Sollog feel a responsibility,
out of love for other people, to try to get folks to get
ready for the apocalyptic things he sees coming; or is he
more like Jonah, angry at the people to whom he is sent to
bring news of God's judgement, and pissed at God when God
spares them? Or is there a middle ground here, where some
other motivation may be on his mind? I ask this because you
told me that Sollog had succeeded in his aim of hardening my
heart, and that sounded sort of Jonah-like to me.
Of course, the main issue here in sci.geo.earthquakes
for me is whether Sollog contends that he can predict
earthquakes with certainty, irrespective of whether his
written predictions are clear to us. In other words, does
he have a method that others can tap into to learn to
predict earthquakes, so those others can use the prediction
method to help get people in the target zone to prepare?
As it is, it looks to me (and, apparently, a lot of
others) as though the predictions are just teasers for
things Sollog wants to sell. And, maybe even more important
to him, as a way to reinforce his opinions about himself,
his lot in life, and other people in the world.
Peace,
Tom McDonald

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 4, 2001, 7:12:18 PM5/4/01
to

"Der Coach" <DerC...@GotATinFoilHat.gov> wrote in message
news:3AF32B98...@GotATinFoilHat.gov...

> What Glen said is only hearsay........ Count on there being only two...
You, and
> " Glen ".

LOL @ " Glen "

Ed Augusts

unread,
May 4, 2001, 7:18:41 PM5/4/01
to

Sylvesterthekat wrote:

You and "Glen", eh? What was that Ed Wood movie? "Glen and Glenda?" (c.
1955), the one where he admits he is a cashmere sweater-wearing
transvestite? Maybe it's a code word for the fact Sollog's crew is
anomalously sexual.


Ed Augusts

unread,
May 4, 2001, 7:33:40 PM5/4/01
to

Der Coach wrote:

For the past YEAR I've been waiting for Sylvesterthekat to make some kind of
Sylvesterthkat-sounding kit kat, er, chit chat, but she has always resisted. I
guess that in a way, "Thylvefter" is a hard cat to follow, er, imitate. Not so
little Tweety boyd, "I tot I taw a poffy kat!"


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:40 PM5/4/01
to

Der Coach <DerC...@GotATinFoilHat.gov> wrote in message
news:3AF32B98...@GotATinFoilHat.gov...

>
> > Ok, well I certainly see what was meant now, but come is not so unusual.
It
> > is what Jesus said at the end of Revelation, and we have already
established
> > that this quake is to honor Jesus (as well as Sollog's girls).
>
> C'mon, " this quake is to honor his girls"???????
> Oh yeah... I can see it now.....
> Dateline: Heaven.
> God decides that he want's to honor the offspring of a fat, burro waxing
speed
> freak with an earthquake.
> Don't you think that, if that WAS the case, then God would put that quake
right
> under sollogs trailer park????

No.

> The dude was a porno peddler in AZ with his dad for crying out loud. But
he was
> too screwed up to take over the business.
>

So what?

> > If you believe I am a genuine fan, you would be right and what you
believe
> > is not a lie.
>
> Cool. I believe you are dillusional... Here's you new foil hat...
> Look out for the choppers.

No one who wears tin foil on their head is delusional.


>
> > I realize that not everything Sollog has said has happened as
> > expected.
>
> Not everything!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
> Try VERY little skippy.

That depends on how much you read.


>
> > Take for instance how he warned America would not be a nation by
> > the year 2001. Well, there are perhaps ways to get around just about
> > anything, like Houge and those other lame prophets do when their
predictions
> > have failed,
>
> Yeah, but he's MEAN about it. Tell me. Where in the bible does Jesus get
pissed
> off and start belittling people? He was more of a " hell fire and
brimstone"
> type of guy.

Yes, we are experiencing from Sollog (or at least his fans/sock puppets) a
level of harshness not recorded in the bible, but personally, I think what
Jesus did to Peter in the last book of John was much more cruel, even if it
was out of love. Understand forevermore, God will chasten those He loves.

> The man says HE'S God. That should be enough for anyone, except maybe the
> mormons. You don't live in Utah do you?
> Have another sheet of foil.

You never know when you might need tin toil.


>
> > but I think
>
> Don't hurt yourself.
>
> > we just need to see past the lies
>
> That's all you get from sollog though.
>
> > to see what is
> > true.
>
> You're not related to Rev. Jim jones are you?
>
> >
>
> > Just because Sollog warned of Clinton's death and it did not come when
> > expected doesn't mean it isn't going to happen and fulfill the prophecy.
>
> He gave a time period.... Outside the window of time is a miss....

Well, technically the date is fixed to them that know the meaning.


>
> > God
> > works in mysterious ways.
>
> That's why sollog is still walking this earth.
>
> > That is how I know Sollog is here to harden the
> > hearts of skeptics. As it is, I am working against him just by telling
you
> > this secret.
>
> Good.... Now post a picture too. We want to have some fun.
>
> > >>>Snipopottamus>>>
> > > It's what Ennis claimed himself. He pointed to a small quake in one of
the
> > > areas he claimed would have a massive quake on the 1st May a few days
> > > after he made the initial prediction.
> > >
> > Yea, I saw that too, but I didn't think it really hit the prophecy
because
> > it was too early. I thought it was just a foreshadow and something to
throw
> > in the face of skeptics.
>
> Bullshit.
> And sollog is full of it. And remember.. you are what you eat...
>

What enters into your mouth exits out at your rear. You are what proceeds
from the heart. What you eat becomes you, not the other way around like you
have said. These are true sayings of Jesus Christ.


> > > As this quote shows, his prediction is deliberately vague to the point
of
> > > meaningless
> > >
> > > (start quote)
> > >
> > > Come MAY DAY near the Canal of the GUADAL, shall come the great quake
> > >
> > > Come MAY DAY near the capital of Honiara in the Isles of Solomon,
shall
> > > come the great quake
> > >
> > > Come MAY DAY ON THE LINE from Jerusalem to Easter Island, shall come
the
> > > great quake
> > >
> > > (end quote)
> > >
> > This is not vague at all. The location is one and the same: Honiara is
the
> > capial of Solomon islands on Guadal canal island
>
> HOLD THE BOOKMOBILE a minute there skippy.....
> He said " the canal of the Guadal".. NOT Guadalcanal.
> That's vague.

Sollog speaks that way all the time. Book of the Old (Old Testament) and the
like. It wasn't vague, really.


>
> > and it is on a line from
> > Jerusalem to Easter Island! Is that being vague about the location?
>
> Yes.
>
> > But the
> > question is will this be a pointer or an actual location.
>
> "My sources say no."---- Magic 8-ball
>
> > > Needless to say, neither place or anywhere on this 'line' of his
suffered
> > > a quake on the day predicted.
> >
> > Well, we'll see about that. I will be the first to admit if Sollog is
wrong,
> > but today is May 4th, still to early to judge.
>
> He said the 1st. I guess May Day means in speed freak lingo.. Any day in
May.
> Right?
> Sonny, I don't know what you are smoking, but I want a POUND OF IT.
>

Well, let me just tell you flat out: Sollog just did not tell us what
calendar was used. There are more than the gregorian (some forty I hear) in
use, one of which is the Celtic Calendar of the Jews, on which the 1st of
May is the 4th of May on the gregorian calendar, which is today.

> > > And there is no indication it is not on the standard calender and some
> > > indication that it is.
> > >
> > > (start quote)
> > > Come the first day of May in the year called 2001
> > > (end quote)
> >
> > There is no indication it is on the gregorian calendar as opposed to the
> > Celtic May 1st or another calendar.
>
> Oh shit, here we go again.
> If the date doesn't work... use a different calendar that fits....
> HE NEVER MENTIONED THE CELTIC CALENDAR! ( sorry for yelling).

Yea, but he did say it was to honor his seed, just like in the last
prophecy, which did mention the Celtic Calendar. Maybe that is the
connection between the prophecies of Sollog and the Celtic Calendar.
Besides, May 21st (Ostara) and May 1st (Beltane) are both Celtic holidays.
How much more obvious do you get. Sollog even used the word Estare or
something in the March 21st prophecy.

> >>>>>>Sniparoni....The San Francisco Treat>>>>>>
>
> > > Actually, most of the time he claims he is God.
> >
> > Yes, he also claims he is above God (absurdity)
>
> WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> You are not beyond hope laddy buck!
> You have realized that sollog IS absurd!!!!!!!!
> Praise Jesus, the boy is not blind!!!
>

Yea, but this absurdity is just to make the wise and prudent laugh at him.

> > and that we are all gods,
>
> No. ONLY I AM.
>
> > which is actually the same thing the bible teaches in Psalms 82:6. It is
not
> > an unchristian idea. Sollog simply believes the nature of God resides in
all
> > life. However, I have heard Sollog say there is a higher Supreme Being
who
> > created the heavens and the earth.
>
> I am willing to bet that... Either you live in southern Idaho, or southern
> Utah,..
> Or went to a catholic school.
>

Don't make that bet. You would lose the money to someone (depending on who
you made the bet with) who would likely squander it on the lusts of his
heart instead of using it to help the needy. I am not any of what you say,
but I do like Catholics because the Marian apparitions seem to support by
beliefs.

> >
> >
> > >
> > > Since you seem to have a hotline to Sollog, what is the point behind
all
> > > these missed and fudged quake predictions?
> > >
> > The point is a warning to man, because of his disbelieving and skeptical
> > heart.
>
> You feel sorry for him.
> You want to feel sorry for someone... Try me... My heart is as black as
coal.

Do I feel sorry for who? What gave you that idea? Because of my desire to
warn others of the good news of the Second Coming? I have warned everyone
who read my words. I feel sorry for everyone who rejects them. If you do not
believe them, that is one thing, but if you reject wisdom, that is another.
For whether you believe or not, God will judge you accordingly to what
wisdom He believes should have been evident to you.

>
> > The end of the world is coming and Great Things are going to happen
> > that are very unusual, but man will have a hard time recognizing the
signs,
> > instead wishing to believe they have nothing to do with God. Practically
no
> > one will believe the Revelation of Jesus Christ is being fulfilled.
>
> Let me guess... through SOLLOG right?
> Ever been to Guyana sonny?

Jesus, Sollog? No, I never thought that. Sollog has said too many times that
he never wanted to be seen as a Messiah figure. It seems his main goal was
to unite humanity and get everyone to believe that they are all children of
the Most High God and gods by right. I see Jesus #2 as a God-like man who
will rule the world in the future.


>
> > The
> > point of Sollog
>
> Is on his head.
>
> > is to make you wake up from your sleep, which is vainity.
>
> yawn.
>
> >
> >
> > > David Patrick
> > >
>
> Der Coach.
> Fanatic # 555-6981.
> Scout/Sniper.
> Rank: Lt. Col.
>
> " Out here on the perimeter, there are no stars. Out here we is stone,
> immaculate " .

Hmm... seems God will fulfill this prophecy.

> Jim Morrison
>


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:44 PM5/4/01
to
Hmm... when someone says something so puzzling I wish I had access to their
mind. What on earth are you talking about?

She-bears? Do you mean she bears were the last thing you were laughing at?
(If not, sorry for this next statement) When I said this, I meant laugh like
they were laughing at Noah when went into the Ark, or misplaced laughing.
She-bears is not necessarily misplaced laughing.

Hmm... the second part is do what? You must mean something not good. Does
this imply you would not think highly of a god who does something bad to
someone for laughing at she-bears? I'm sorry, please let me know what you
meant because I'm just not able to discern it.


Cary Kittrell <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message

news:9cv95l$lkp$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:46 PM5/4/01
to
It beats the hell out of me how you come to a conclusion like that. I just
sit back and realize how bad some people are at arriving at true
conclusions. Not just this, but EVERYTHING...


George Black <gbl...@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:9cv3l5$coi$1...@lust.ihug.co.nz...

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:47 PM5/4/01
to

Thomas S. McDonald <ts...@wwt.net> wrote in message
news:JrGI6.1355$Gi4....@reggie.win.bright.net...

>
> Dear Leo Pheonix,
> Well, this has been enlightening. You deny being
> Sollog, yet one of your responses as good as says that you
> made the prediction.

I assuredly wasn't referring to any prediction made by Sollog. See if you
can find where you heard me say that.

> If the prediction is by Sollog, and it
> is yours, you ipso facto are Sollog. But I am not wedded to
> this. You may indeed be a fan, not the Log himself. It's
> not terribly important to me.
> What I would like from you, if you can, is to point me
> to a website or some other writings that Sollog _did_ write,

Well, I suppose we can trust that He writes the prophecies that are hosted
on www.sollog.com
I don't know where else you can get them from. Don't be fooled by what it
says about joining to read his prophecies. They are always posted on the
main page, but then they are removed. Others are archived on www.deja.com.
Do not be thrown off by the pop-ups, pink text on black pages, and other XXX
banners. Nothing bad will appear on your screen unless perhaps you actually
try to follow those links! Basically, if you want to hear what Sollog has
prophesied in a flash, he has prophesied the occurance of nuclear terrorism
in the near future and has a list of cities and what bad things will happen
to them. It is your normal dooms day warning. Try to ignore any
advertisements because it will feel like he just wants your money if you
don't.

> as opposed to sites that quote him, or speak of him and his
> words in the third person. So far, I haven't seen anything
> like this, and I have looked at three websites so far
> "about" him, not (as far as I understand) "by" him.

There is another website www.247news.net. I believe Sollog claims to be a
reporter, but actually writes the articles himself.

> As far as you know, does Sollog feel a responsibility,
> out of love for other people, to try to get folks to get
> ready for the apocalyptic things he sees coming;

It seems Sollog couldn't care less what everyone thinks. I assure you, God's
Will is not always to give everyone a clear warning that will turn them to
repentance. [refer to Matthew 13:13]

> or is he
> more like Jonah, angry at the people to whom he is sent to
> bring news of God's judgement, and pissed at God when God
> spares them? Or is there a middle ground here, where some
> other motivation may be on his mind? I ask this because you
> told me that Sollog had succeeded in his aim of hardening my
> heart, and that sounded sort of Jonah-like to me.

Perhaps.

> Of course, the main issue here in sci.geo.earthquakes
> for me is whether Sollog contends that he can predict
> earthquakes with certainty, irrespective of whether his
> written predictions are clear to us. In other words, does
> he have a method that others can tap into to learn to
> predict earthquakes, so those others can use the prediction
> method to help get people in the target zone to prepare?

That is unknown. It depends on how far you are willing to go. Sollog claims
to make blood sacrifices to get his prophetic powers. Not everyone is
willing do go this far to see if it works. How far are you willing to go is
the question.

> As it is, it looks to me (and, apparently, a lot of
> others) as though the predictions are just teasers for
> things Sollog wants to sell.

Hmm... I have no considered that for the reason that it doesn't strike me
that Sollog is into wealth. Well, don't get me wrong, he does seem to be
very rich already (I believe his websites even say so) but it doesn't feel
like Sollog is into wealth for any greedy reasons. You know, like he could
care less, but he uses it for certain causes, maintaining his network, his
daughters financially maybe, altars, rare Nostradamus books, who knows? Well
that is another thing. Sollog has interest in material possesions, rare
coins, cards, books, and the like. I sure hope he doesn't take heart in the
heartless.

> And, maybe even more important
> to him, as a way to reinforce his opinions about himself,
> his lot in life, and other people in the world.

Well, who knows? Sollog is a very interesting person.

> Peace,
> Tom McDonald
>


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:49 PM5/4/01
to
It has NOTHING to do with the calendar, for there is but one true Calendar,
and that is the prophetic one.


Sylvesterthekat <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:vkFI6.333$B%4.17...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:52 PM5/4/01
to
What don't you understand? I have made the truth clearly visible. Do your
eyes not see? I have made it clear to you to know that the LORD God above is
watching... everything. Every voice is heard, but not all obeyed. Every
thought is known, but not all manifested. Every truth is real, but not all
evident. And every word of God will be fulfilled. The LORD God will visit
this earth so all sinners BEWARE! I am here only to call sinners to
repentance and bring the good news of the judgment to all the saints. The
LORD God will execute judgment upon all and destroy all unrighteousness. The
LORD God saith, The soul that sins shall die. Who are you to disannul My
judgment?

And now that I have given you a warning, you want a sign? You think Sollog
is here to give you a sign? If you were wise you would heed the warning and
move to safety, come out of her my people, and not turn back like Lot's
wife, which was a message to those who disbelieve. Where you live, going
about your life, continuing as if everything will go as planned, you will
learn the hard way. Certainly the time is not for some years, but it will be
here before you know it, in no time at all compared to the days that await.
The plan of God is not as the plan of men. In just a short time the world
went from laughing at Noah to utter destruction. This destruction is off
some years, but it will come at just the right time. The wise will know
when, and if you want to be saved, you must grow eyes that see, because the
signs are already here, and they are increasing slowly like a frog in a pot
of water. The goal of this life isn't to help yourself, worry about your
problems and other worldly things, but to help others, for in doing so you
save yourself and them.

So to answer your question, you want a clear message do you. Here is your
clear message:

You are asking for the WRONG thing.

Read all of Matthew 13. It is worth is.


Sylvesterthekat <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message

news:JUEI6.314$B%4.17...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:54 PM5/4/01
to

Der Coach <DerC...@GotATinFoilHat.gov> wrote in message
news:3AF32158...@GotATinFoilHat.gov...

>
>
> Leo Pheonix wrote:
>
> > > Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,
> >
> > I am not Sollog. Why do you think I'm Sollog? Just because I'm writing
his
> > behalf?
>
> You seem to be as illiterate as Soiled Log. Perhaps you are his wife...
The
> queen of Hollywood ( and Vine).
>

Sollog's wife is not with us anymore you nitwit.

> > >>>> Snip>>>
> >
> > Hmm... I must have missed it? Why do you think Sollog's prediction is
> > sexual?
>
> Because he kept repeating " come".
> How's that foil head piece fitting anyway?

Children would never see it that way, which only exposes your corruption
towards and by the world...


>
> > > BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
> > > prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
> > > other sock puppets...but ya, you)
> >
> > You are probably not the first to make this mistake. I am not Sollog. If
you
> > bothered to check the header info stuff you might have realized that.
>
> You defend sollog though. Why?
> He's a liar, fraud, fool, moron, ( the list goes on and on).....

I believe I have made it sufficiently clear why Sollog gets this label from
the likes of you and your kind.
>
..snip

> Coach
>


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 4, 2001, 10:29:56 PM5/4/01
to
And you count ME as the masses? If you knew everything I knew, perhaps you
would believe the same way I do, which necessarily includes that it is not I
who has fallen to that great lie of which you speak.


Der Coach <DerC...@GotATinFoilHat.gov> wrote in message

news:3AF3233E...@GotATinFoilHat.gov...

T. E.

unread,
May 4, 2001, 11:14:31 PM5/4/01
to
Leo Pheonix wrote:
> [...] you must grow eyes that see, because the

> signs are already here, and they are increasing slowly like a frog in a pot
> of water. [...]

ARTHUR
Consult the Book of Armaments.

BROTHER MAYNARD
Armaments Chapter Two Verses Nine to Twenty One.

ANOTHER MONK
(reading from bible)
And St. Attila raised his hand grenade up on high saying
"O Lord bless this thy hand grenade that with it thou mayest blow
thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy. "and the Lord did grin and
people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies
and orang-utans and breakfast cereals and fruit bats and...

BROTHER MAYNARD
Skip a bit brother ...

ANOTHER MONK
... Er ... oh, yes ... and the Lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou
take out the Holy Pin, then shalt thou count to three, no more,
no less. Three shalt be the number thou shalt count, and the
number of the counting shalt be three. Four shalt thou not count,
neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three.
Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number,
be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch
towards thou foe, who being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.

ARTHUR
Right.

He pulls Pin out. The MONK blesses the grenade as ...

ARTHUR
(quietly)
One, two

, five ...

GALAHAD
Three, sir!

ARTHUR
Three.

ARTHUR throws the grenade at the RABBIT. There is an explosion and
cheering from the KNIGHTS.

ALL KNIGHTS
Praise be to the lord. Huzzah!

George Black

unread,
May 5, 2001, 12:23:17 AM5/5/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...
> It beats the hell out of me how you come to a conclusion like that. I just
> sit back and realize how bad some people are at arriving at true
> conclusions. Not just this, but EVERYTHING...

Masochistic too eh


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 5, 2001, 12:44:11 AM5/5/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...
> And you count ME as the masses? If you knew everything I knew, perhaps you
> would believe the same way I do, which necessarily includes that it is not
I
> who has fallen to that great lie of which you speak.

No, don't worry. You are one of a very small minority.


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 5, 2001, 12:36:46 AM5/5/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...
> It has NOTHING to do with the calendar, for there is but one true
Calendar,
> and that is the prophetic one.

And what, pray tell, is a prophetic calendar? Is that the sort of calendar
where you can say an event will happen on May 1st and then when it happens
on June 5th you say "ah but you see, on the 'prophetic calendar' that *is*
May 1st"?


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 5, 2001, 12:42:56 AM5/5/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...
<snip all the foregoing flowery anecdotes>

> So to answer your question, you want a clear message do you. Here is your
> clear message:

No, I didn't ask for a message. I asked for a reason from you just why you
can believe Sollog. Quite simple. I don't want a load of quasi religious
rhetoric, just a straight answer to a straight question.

> You are asking for the WRONG thing.
>
> Read all of Matthew 13. It is worth is.

For similar reasons to why I cannot possibly swallow Slobdog's crap, I am
also an atheist and do not go in for all that religion stuff so I'll pass on
that.

You are beginning to sound suspiciously like others we've encountered on
here and your methods are identical. I also note that you said (and I
quote):

"And now that I have given you a warning, you want a sign? "

So are you now also issuing warnings or is it that in fact you are old
Slobby himself?

If you cannot answer the above questions in a clear and
not-filled-with-bullshit-evasions way then don't bother answering at all, k?


Reverend Ludicrous Wack

unread,
May 5, 2001, 1:52:50 AM5/5/01
to

Leo Pheonix <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...
>

Let's just sum this up.....

...KNOCK IT OFF TROLL.

[snip]

--
The Reverend Ludicrous Wack

*<S_CuLT# 371-15197-097>*
**<Rank: Cardinal>**

'Reality is a concept of the mentally inept'--RLW

'There is no magic, only onions!" -Pug of Stardock


Moley

unread,
May 5, 2001, 3:59:32 AM5/5/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:

> It has NOTHING to do with the calendar, for there is but one true Calendar,
> and that is the prophetic one.
>

So if it has "NOTHING to do with the calendar", why go to the trouble of even
mentioning the Celtic Calendar and trying to post-dict the date by use of
comparisons between the Gregorian and Celtic calendars, extrapolating lucky
triple sevens and in-between days etc.?

If it has "NOTHING to do with the calendar" why BOTHER to give a date at all?

It's not so much a case of moving the goalposts with you as ripping up the
goalposts, the pitch and the whole stadium, then replacing them with an ice
rink so you can verbally skate around any issues brought up.

BTW. What date is it today on this new "prophetic calendar" that you've
entered into the discussion? 12th of Never?

_____________
M

Thomas S. McDonald

unread,
May 5, 2001, 8:18:43 AM5/5/01
to

"T. E." <teps...@agere.com> wrote in message
news:3AF37017...@agere.com...

Dear T. E.,
LOL! I just watched _Monty Python and the Holy Grail on
DVD, and for the first time saw it with subtitles. Man, had
I missed a lot! Do you have a copy of the script to go
from, or do you have the whole thing by heart?
Also, do you think the Holy Handgrenade is an
appropriate cleanser for the Slobsmogs of the world? Or
might he use It to create the EQs he predicts, when they
don't happen to his schedule (whatever that might be)?
Peace,
Tom McDonald

Krandle

unread,
May 5, 2001, 8:46:33 AM5/5/01
to
>>
"If Sollog's predictions are now revealed to be based upon the Celtic
Calendar not the Gregorian one, does that mean that all of his previous
"hits" are, in fact, misses? If not, why the sudden change of calendar?"
>>--------"Moley

>>
"It has NOTHING to do with the calendar, for there is but one true Calendar,
and that is the prophetic one."

>>--------"Leo Pheonix"

Woooaa... that was a good answer, now its all begining to make sence, so
lets see now using this Prophetic Calendar and this sequence of numbers

1--5 --3 --4
/ / /
3 4 5

I can easly see when... Wait a second, could you explain that again?

Moley

unread,
May 5, 2001, 8:50:43 AM5/5/01
to

"Thomas S. McDonald" wrote:

>
> Dear T. E.,
> LOL! I just watched _Monty Python and the Holy Grail on
> DVD, and for the first time saw it with subtitles. Man, had
> I missed a lot! Do you have a copy of the script to go
> from, or do you have the whole thing by heart?
> Also, do you think the Holy Handgrenade is an
> appropriate cleanser for the Slobsmogs of the world? Or
> might he use It to create the EQs he predicts, when they
> don't happen to his schedule (whatever that might be)?
> Peace,
> Tom McDonald

I think he's quoting from the "Mønty Pythøn Ik Den Hølie Grälien (Bok)"
which includes the screenplay along with lots of extras like the first
draft, behind the scenes pics and lots more.

I think i saw the "bok" in the very late seventies and what I seem to
remember is that the one thing that stuck in my mind was the
ad/blueprint for the upside-down love chair. V. bizarre. Or was that
a Kenny Everett annual? Hmmm

Anyway, If you can find it, take a look.


______________
M


Richard Bell

unread,
May 5, 2001, 8:28:48 PM5/5/01
to
In article <3af3...@monitor.lanset.com>,
Leo Pheonix <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote:
>
>Yes, men do lie, both the good and the bad, but the Truth is somewhere in
>between. Skeptics will say in their heart: Lack of evidence is evidence of
>lack, which means that because God or miracles have not been sufficiently
>proven, it is evidence that God doesn't exist! They will believe that the
>evidence of lack constitutes more validity then the "make believe" in the
>bible and supernatural miracles (read: lies) that are presently happening,
>let alone the prophecies.
>

I believe in God, Jesus, miracles, and an afterlife, BUT I still believe
that SOLLOG is a at best a sincere delussional, and most likely a con man
of limited talent.

the answer guy

unread,
May 5, 2001, 9:00:25 PM5/5/01
to

"Cary Kittrell" <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:9culo7$ced$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...
> In article <PrzI6.1638$Hk.1...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> "the

answer guy" <jlj...@lljjlkll.com> writes:
> <
> <"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
> <news:3af2...@monitor.lanset.com...

> <> > Dear Sollog/Ennis sockpuppet,
> <>
> <> I am not Sollog. Why do you think I'm Sollog? Just because I'm writing
his
> <> behalf?
> <>
> <> > I noticed that you posted to alt.prophecies.nostradamus
> <> > only, and not to the one newsgroup that might give a
> <> > scientific once-over to your rambling, scrabbling attempt to
> <> > cover your/Sollog's ass.
> <>
> <> Since when have I posted to any group other than a.p.n.?
> <>
> <> > So I am posting your pathetic
> <> > drivel to sci.geo.earthquakes to let folks in that NG have a
> <> > look, and perhaps comment on the worthiness of your screed.
> <> > I suspect that you just forgot to include the nice
> <> > geologists, in you haste to paste a fig leaf on the ignoble,
> <> > and frankly and disturbingly sexual, original prediction.
> <> > Hope the goose got away before you...well, this is a family
> <> > NG.

> <>
> <> Hmm... I must have missed it? Why do you think Sollog's prediction is
> <> sexual?
> <>
> <> > BTW, why the need to try to claim the fulfillment of the
> <> > prediction is yet to come when you (all right, one of your
> <> > other sock puppets...but ya, you)
> <>
> <> You are probably not the first to make this mistake. I am not Sollog.
If
> <you
> <> bothered to check the header info stuff you might have realized that.
> <>
> <> > already claimed victory
> <> > with a small earthquake in the area of the Solomons just a
> <> > couple of days after the prediction?
> <>
> <> Do you think that is a victory? Is this what you say, or did you hear
this
> <> from someone else?
> <>
> <> > Don't tell me you are
> <> > going for the hat trick: missing and hitting the date,
> <> > somehow; missing and hitting the place, somehow, and missing
> <> > and hitting the magnitude, somehow?
> <> > Please don't change for me, though. In a world of
> <> > insecurity and instability, the assured failure of all your
> <> > predicitons is a rock upon which I can surely depend.
> <>
> <> You fool. Sollog has done to you exactly what he planned all along.
> <Through
> <> his "failure" (as you call it) Sollog has hardened your heart, the
whole
> <> time working for the LORD God.
> <
> <Clever guy, that slopdog.
> <
> <There are two surefire ways to tell if Ennis is the author of a post.
> <
> <1. He uses the same epithets when insulting someone, such as fool and
> <faggot.
> <
> <2. The post supports slopdog.
> <
> <
>
> I really don't think so. Solly can't find his way from one end of a
sentence
> to the other, at least not in writing; this boy writes just fine.
> AND he uses using actual punctuation marks. And standard capitalization.
> Plus, he's a real sweetie compared to $OLLOG -- calling you a "fool"
> after a certain amount of provocation is pretty much net.standard (sad
> to say), whereas SOLLOG comes out firing "MORON" and "limp-dick viagra
> taking faggot" if you fail to fall down and worship Him from the get-go.
>

Sloppy reserves the crude writing style for his "NINE" series sock puppets.
As evidenced by his JP Essene persona Sloppy can package his lunacy in
pretty words. Leo Phoenix's convoluted prophecy revisionism and the copycat
design of his website bear the definite stamp of a Sloppydog sockpuppet.


Richard Bell

unread,
May 5, 2001, 8:40:45 PM5/5/01
to
In article <3af3...@monitor.lanset.com>,
Leo Pheonix <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote:
>What don't you understand? I have made the truth clearly visible. Do your
>eyes not see? I have made it clear to you to know that the LORD God above is
>watching... everything. Every voice is heard, but not all obeyed. Every
>thought is known, but not all manifested. Every truth is real, but not all
>evident. And every word of God will be fulfilled. The LORD God will visit
>this earth so all sinners BEWARE! I am here only to call sinners to
>repentance and bring the good news of the judgment to all the saints. The
>LORD God will execute judgment upon all and destroy all unrighteousness. The
>LORD God saith, The soul that sins shall die. Who are you to disannul My
>judgment?

This is all very good, fiery christian ministry, but what does it have to do
with an obvously false prophet? Unless SOLLOG is trying to bring about the
endtimes by being one of the false prophets that we were warned about, there
is pathetically little to commend him.

Der Coach

unread,
May 5, 2001, 10:36:46 PM5/5/01
to

Leo Pheonix scribbled in crayon:

> And you count ME as the masses?

No. I count you as an idiot.

> If you knew everything I knew,

I could score free porn too?

> perhaps you
> would believe the same way I do

What? That the earth is flat?

> , which necessarily includes that it is not I
> who has fallen to that great lie of which you speak.

Prove it.

Der Coach.

Der Coach

unread,
May 5, 2001, 10:52:59 PM5/5/01
to

Leo Pheonix put down the light bulb filled with Meth and gasped:

> >>Snip>>


> > Don't you think that, if that WAS the case, then God would put that quake
> right
> > under sollogs trailer park????
>
> No.

Why not?

> > The dude was a porno peddler in AZ with his dad for crying out loud. But
> he was
> > too screwed up to take over the business.
> >
> So what?

Well, surely an agent of God, would not peddle porno, and surely not almost kill
a police officer, in an attempt to escape a DUI charge in a rent a car....

> > > If you believe I am a genuine fan, you would be right and what you
> believe
> > > is not a lie.
> >
> > Cool. I believe you are dillusional... Here's you new foil hat...
> > Look out for the choppers.
>
> No one who wears tin foil on their head is delusional.

OH REALLY? Me thinks that yours is fitting a bit tight.

>
> >
> > > I realize that not everything Sollog has said has happened as
> > > expected.
> >
> > Not everything!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
> > Try VERY little skippy.
>
> That depends on how much you read.

Or what calendar you use...
I now quote SOLLOG...
" Location is meaningless."
So, tell us, if location is meaningless, then, what good does an earthquake
prediction serve?
I predict there will be a Mag. 7 somewhere on earth. This month.....
Tell me what good is that? Should the entire earth brace?
Bullshit.
That's what my prediction is.. as well as SOLLOGS.

> >> snip>>>


>
> Yes, we are experiencing from Sollog (or at least his fans/sock puppets) a
> level of harshness not recorded in the bible, but personally, I think what
> Jesus did to Peter in the last book of John was much more cruel, even if it
> was out of love. Understand forevermore, God will chasten those He loves

I KNEW you went to a catholic school.....
I'm done with you for now,.....
You are a fool, moron, idiot, ( I'm using YOUR God's lingo here), Fucking
asshole, Dipshit, nitwit,...etc.
I never knew that God was so fat, foul-mouthed, bitter, foolish, insane......
The list goes on and on..

Sollog is a fraud.

Der Coach


> .
>

If sollog sucks... then you too must suck.

" Location is meaningless"!!!!!---- Soiled Hog

Der Coach

unread,
May 5, 2001, 10:54:05 PM5/5/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:
<<<Snipocrappacus>>>>

YAWN.

DC

Der Coach

unread,
May 5, 2001, 10:55:17 PM5/5/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:
<<<SNIP>>>

Hooked on Pheonix???????

Idiot.

DC

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 6, 2001, 1:08:52 AM5/6/01
to
Yes, I thought so.


Sylvesterthekat <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message

news:vyLI6.550$B%4.29...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 6, 2001, 1:08:58 AM5/6/01
to

Richard Bell <rlb...@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in message
news:9d26id$5bl$2...@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca...

You criteria for judging sollog to be a false prophet must not be the same
used by myself. We must not hold to the same religion... yet I hold to none
save God.


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 6, 2001, 1:08:54 AM5/6/01
to

Der Coach <DerC...@GotATinFoilHat.gov> wrote in message

news:3AF4BBF2...@GotATinFoilHat.gov...


>
>
> Leo Pheonix put down the light bulb filled with Meth and gasped:
>
> > >>Snip>>
> > > Don't you think that, if that WAS the case, then God would put that
quake
> > right
> > > under sollogs trailer park????
> >
> > No.
>
> Why not?

Those who study God's Will do not this this explained to them.

>
> > > The dude was a porno peddler in AZ with his dad for crying out loud.
But
> > he was
> > > too screwed up to take over the business.
> > >
> > So what?
>
> Well, surely an agent of God, would not peddle porno, and surely not
almost kill
> a police officer, in an attempt to escape a DUI charge in a rent a car....

Prove it.
>
..snip

> >
> > Yes, we are experiencing from Sollog (or at least his fans/sock puppets)
a
> > level of harshness not recorded in the bible, but personally, I think
what
> > Jesus did to Peter in the last book of John was much more cruel, even if
it
> > was out of love. Understand forevermore, God will chasten those He loves
>
> I KNEW you went to a catholic school.....

Prove it.

> I'm done with you for now,.....
> You are a fool, moron, idiot, ( I'm using YOUR God's lingo here), Fucking
> asshole, Dipshit, nitwit,...etc.
> I never knew that God was so fat, foul-mouthed, bitter, foolish,
insane......
> The list goes on and on..
>
> Sollog is a fraud.
>

Well you know how the song goes, "What if God was one of us. Just a slob
like one of us..."

> Der Coach
>
..snip


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 6, 2001, 1:08:56 AM5/6/01
to

Sylvesterthekat <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:kxLI6.549$B%4.29...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...

>
> "Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
> news:3af3...@monitor.lanset.com...
> <snip all the foregoing flowery anecdotes>
>
> > So to answer your question, you want a clear message do you. Here is
your
> > clear message:
>
> No, I didn't ask for a message. ..snip

Look, I said what I said, and I am not going to tell you another thing.

> > You are asking for the WRONG thing.
> >
> > Read all of Matthew 13. It is worth is.
>
> For similar reasons to why I cannot possibly swallow Slobdog's crap, I am
> also an atheist and do not go in for all that religion stuff so I'll pass
on
> that.
>
> You are beginning to sound suspiciously like others we've encountered on
> here and your methods are identical. I also note that you said (and I
> quote):
>
> "And now that I have given you a warning, you want a sign? "
>
> So are you now also issuing warnings or is it that in fact you are old
> Slobby himself?
>

Yes, I also give warnings.

..snip


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 6, 2001, 1:08:59 AM5/6/01
to
No, but the prophetic calendar is the true day or year the event will take
place. Usually if you have yourself a real prophet they will give you the
true day according to the gregorian calendar, but not necessarily so. God
works through all mediums.


Sylvesterthekat <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message

news:yrLI6.547$B%4.29...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...

Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 6, 2001, 1:09:00 AM5/6/01
to

Moley <Mo...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com> wrote in message
news:3AF3B295...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com...

>
>
> Leo Pheonix wrote:
>
> > It has NOTHING to do with the calendar, for there is but one true
Calendar,
> > and that is the prophetic one.
> >
>
> So if it has "NOTHING to do with the calendar", why go to the trouble of
even
> mentioning the Celtic Calendar and trying to post-dict the date by use of
> comparisons between the Gregorian and Celtic calendars, extrapolating
lucky
> triple sevens and in-between days etc.?

That is just to harden the hearts of skeptics as I said before. The day
given can mean anything, but we only know what we have been given. It is
only through the spirit one can discern True truth, for anything can
seemingly be true.


>
> If it has "NOTHING to do with the calendar" why BOTHER to give a date at
all?
>

If you have yourself a true prophet, they can explain all things so long as
they will.

> It's not so much a case of moving the goalposts with you as ripping up the
> goalposts, the pitch and the whole stadium, then replacing them with an
ice
> rink so you can verbally skate around any issues brought up.

Yea, but what is the truth of the matter?


>
> BTW. What date is it today on this new "prophetic calendar" that you've
> entered into the discussion? 12th of Never?

The 113th day of the 13th year before the end of the world. Count the days
yourself, but time is irrelivant as the days near. BTW, this is not
according to me, but I do believe the prophet who spoke it.

>
> _____________
> M
>


Moley

unread,
May 6, 2001, 11:06:27 AM5/6/01
to

Leo Pheonix wrote:

>
> > BTW. What date is it today on this new "prophetic calendar" that you've
> > entered into the discussion? 12th of Never?
>
> The 113th day of the 13th year before the end of the world.

Hmmm... I don't think that'll fit on my cheques.

____________
M

Marcus S. Turner

unread,
May 6, 2001, 2:03:04 PM5/6/01
to

Leo Pheonix <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af530ae$1...@monitor.lanset.com...

> > Well, surely an agent of God, would not peddle porno, and surely not
> almost kill
> > a police officer, in an attempt to escape a DUI charge in a rent a
car....
>
> Prove it.

If I'm not mistaken, Jodi Lobel, Assistant DA for Philadelphia, already
proved it...
http://www.citypaper.net/articles/050996/article016.shtml

"The system doesn't work," God ( Sollog) spaketh. "This is why it will be
destroyed."


jha amin

unread,
May 6, 2001, 2:43:02 PM5/6/01
to
In article <ukgJ6.180$ih3....@news2.atl>, Marcus S. Turner says...
Where does it state that Sollog was found guilty?

It certainlly was insulting to suggest that he would make a fine attorney. ;)

***Even rubber-faced judge Anthony DeFino, one of the fairest jurists ever to
sit
on the bench, said that, despite his antics, SOLLOG would make a fine attorney
if he just stuck to the issues.

DeFino said SOLLOG should go to law school. And this after DeFino regularly
turned red in the face and sustained objections that assistant district attorney
Jodi Lobel never made when SOLLOG went off on his religious ravings.

"He's a brilliant man," said DeFino, moments after calling a shrink from the
bench to evaluate "a man we have here who claims to be God."


Kenneth Brody

unread,
May 6, 2001, 5:21:22 PM5/6/01
to
jha amin wrote:
>
> In article <ukgJ6.180$ih3....@news2.atl>, Marcus S. Turner says...
> >
> >
> >Leo Pheonix <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
> >news:3af530ae$1...@monitor.lanset.com...
> >> > Well, surely an agent of God, would not peddle porno, and surely not
> >> almost kill
> >> > a police officer, in an attempt to escape a DUI charge in a rent a
> >car....
> >>
> >> Prove it.
> >
> >If I'm not mistaken, Jodi Lobel, Assistant DA for Philadelphia, already
> >proved it...
> >http://www.citypaper.net/articles/050996/article016.shtml
> >
> >"The system doesn't work," God ( Sollog) spaketh. "This is why it will be
> >destroyed."
> >
> >
> Where does it state that Sollog was found guilty?
[...]

I guess you don't read very well?

=====

...

And after four days of listening to Ennis rant on about conspiracies, holy
prognostications and his pending lawsuits against almost everyone associated
with the case, the jury was in no mood to quibble over D'Urso's deviations.

Guilty, your honor, said the foreman on each of the four counts against
SOLLOG.

...

[... Two outstanding arrest warrants when arrested for threatening the
president. (That charge was dropped.) ...]

One was from Maricopa County, Arizona, where in 1987, SOLLOG admitted to
selling obscene materials. He was put on probation, but violated it with an
aggravated assault later that year. When SOLLOG left Arizona, authorities
issued a warrant for his arrest.

The other outstanding warrant against SOLLOG was for the incident with
D'Urso. For whatever reason, the court had forgotten about his failure to
appear in that case. Until he was arrested for threatening Clinton.

...

=====

--

+---------+----------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Kenneth | kenb...@bestweb.net | "The opinions expressed |
| J. | | herein are not necessarily |
| Brody | http://www.bestweb.net/~kenbrody | those of fP Technologies." |
+---------+----------------------------------+-----------------------------+
GCS (ver 3.12) d- s+++: a C++$(+++) ULAVHSC^++++$ P+>+++ L+(++) E-(---)
W++ N+ o+ K(---) w@ M@ V- PS++(+) PE@ Y+ PGP-(+) t+ R@ tv+() b+
DI+(++++) D---() G e* h---- r+++ y?


Marcus S. Turner

unread,
May 6, 2001, 5:39:59 PM5/6/01
to

jha amin <jha_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:WWgJ6.3512$vg1.2...@www.newsranger.com...

Hmmm.... Right there in the middle of the article?

"Guilty, your honor, said the foreman on each of the four counts against
SOLLOG."

OH! And don't forget!!

"Last September(1995), the feds busted SOLLOG for making threats against
the president.

The Secret Service has no sense of humor about such things and dispatched
agents to SOLLOG's Society Hill Towers apartment to arrest him. Though the
charges were dropped, SOLLOG was held because law enforcement officials
found two outstanding warrants for SOLLOG's arrest.

jha amin

unread,
May 6, 2001, 7:30:20 PM5/6/01
to
In article <RvjJ6.268$ih3....@news2.atl>, Marcus S. Turner says...
Yep (somewhat red faced), you are right.
This was the trial with the prophecies in the court records.
Guess that is why it took four days.
I would love to see that transcript.

Ed Augusts

unread,
May 6, 2001, 9:44:38 PM5/6/01
to

the answer guy wrote:

> Leo Phoenix's convoluted prophecy revisionism and the copycat
>design of his website bear the definite stamp of a Sloppydog sockpuppet.
>


Yes, but is he a Sloppydog sockpuppet
or could he be a Slob dog suckpuppet
or a Sollog suckpuppet
or a Soggy log sockpuppet
or a soppydock slockpuppet
or a sockydog sop puppet
or a Sollog's log suckpuppet
or a sucky dog slop puppet
or a socky slop dog puppet
or a puppy dog slog pocket
or a sloggy log suck poppet
or a shaggy dog sog pulpit
or a poopy dog slop bucket
or a poopy dog slap puppet
or a poopy pup slap puppet
or a Sollog dogged slap puppet
or a Sollog slapped dog puppet
or a Sollog popped dog pocket
or a Sollog pooped dog pocket
or a soiled log dog pocket
or a soiled log pup docket
of a soiled log slop bucket
or a soiled dog slop bucket
or a soiled dog slog pocket
or a soiled pup slop bucket
or a soiled pup dog locket
or a sloggy dog god puppet
or a sloggy dog poop bucket?
or _____________________(fill in the blank!)

[Your vote will count for very little
and it may not even be counted at all.
But that's the way it's been going
lately in this country].

NO on 2nd thought
DON'T VOTE....this
ng has been thru enough!


Thomas S. McDonald

unread,
May 7, 2001, 12:23:22 AM5/7/01
to

"Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
news:3af5...@monitor.lanset.com...

Dear Leo Pheonix,
Let me get this straight. If today (which, when you
posted the reply, as it show on my news server, the date in
the common calendar was May 6, 2001) is the 113th day of the
year -13 BEW (before the end of the world), can we assume
that the prophetic calendar is something like 13 days behind
the common calendar? Adding the days from the beginning of
the common year to May 6, I come up with 126 days. If the
"prophetic calendar" shows 113 days gone in its year, that
would seem to say that whatever date Solfog gives in his
predicitons should be read as occuring 13 days _after_ the
Gregorian date given, if S. uses the common months but
transposes dates to the prophetic calendar. If so, does
that mean that a Solmog "hit" dated May 1 should really hit
May 14 in the Gregorian calendar?
And, if this is so, how does the alleged "celtic
calendar", which I for one think is an invention or
misinterpretation by Sol., fit into the mix?
I'm just trying to get a handle on the mysteries you
present regarding this matter of calendars, with the object
of seeing if there may be a true mystical reading possible,
or if, as the evidence to date suggests to me, Solong is
just making it up as he goes along.
Peace,
Tom McDonald

George Black

unread,
May 7, 2001, 1:54:04 AM5/7/01
to

"Moley" <Mo...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com> wrote in message
news:3AF56818...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com...

Betcha the 13th is going to bring a large lump of bad luck to the dweeb


Ed Augusts

unread,
May 7, 2001, 2:06:00 AM5/7/01
to

George Black wrote:

Actually, the 'bad luck' arrived today with the posting of a news article
exposing some of Sollog's wretched past indiscretions and lunacies.
I don't see how he can ever post on the USENET again, since he'll be
taunted with that incriminating nut-case stuff from his past no matter
where he goes. --e.a.

[3 crossposted groups removed]


Kevin Burnett

unread,
May 7, 2001, 3:27:13 AM5/7/01
to
On Sat, 5 May 2001 22:09:00 -0700, Leo Pheonix <l...@lanset.com> wrote:
>
>Moley <Mo...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com> wrote in message
>news:3AF3B295...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com...
>>
>>
>> Leo Pheonix wrote:
>>
>> > It has NOTHING to do with the calendar, for there is but one true
>Calendar,
>> > and that is the prophetic one.
>> >
>>
>> So if it has "NOTHING to do with the calendar", why go to the trouble of
>even
>> mentioning the Celtic Calendar and trying to post-dict the date by use of
>> comparisons between the Gregorian and Celtic calendars, extrapolating
>lucky
>> triple sevens and in-between days etc.?
>
>That is just to harden the hearts of skeptics as I said before. The day
>given can mean anything, but we only know what we have been given. It is
>only through the spirit one can discern True truth, for anything can
>seemingly be true.

So then, the date can be re-interpreted to mean anything, no matter what
$ollog says the "date" will be?

>>
>> If it has "NOTHING to do with the calendar" why BOTHER to give a date at
>all?
>>
>If you have yourself a true prophet, they can explain all things so long as
>they will.

Yes, the profit will after-the-fact re-interpret his "prophecy" to fit the
facts.

>
>> It's not so much a case of moving the goalposts with you as ripping up the
>> goalposts, the pitch and the whole stadium, then replacing them with an
>ice
>> rink so you can verbally skate around any issues brought up.
>
>Yea, but what is the truth of the matter?

The "truth of the matter" is that $ollog makes specific predictions, using
very specific dates, and he fails every time. The only way any of his
predictions fit any facts is if you re-interpret them after-the-fact.

>>
>> BTW. What date is it today on this new "prophetic calendar" that you've
>> entered into the discussion? 12th of Never?
>
>The 113th day of the 13th year before the end of the world. Count the days
>yourself, but time is irrelivant as the days near. BTW, this is not
>according to me, but I do believe the prophet who spoke it.

In other words, you have no real answer, so you will generate a bunch of
obfuscation.

--
Kevin Burnett http://www.catnip.org/


T. E.

unread,
May 7, 2001, 9:00:22 AM5/7/01
to
Moley wrote:
>
> "Thomas S. McDonald" wrote:
>
> >
> > Dear T. E.,
> > LOL! I just watched _Monty Python and the Holy Grail on
> > DVD, and for the first time saw it with subtitles. Man, had
> > I missed a lot! Do you have a copy of the script to go
> > from, or do you have the whole thing by heart?
> > Also, do you think the Holy Handgrenade is an
> > appropriate cleanser for the Slobsmogs of the world? Or
> > might he use It to create the EQs he predicts, when they
> > don't happen to his schedule (whatever that might be)?

I'd venture to guess that the holy hand grenade, being an instrument of
punishing naughty people would be of great interest to SOLLLOG.
Hopefully, he has no access to it.

> > Peace,
> > Tom McDonald
>
> I think he's quoting from the "Mønty Pythøn Ik Den Hølie Grälien (Bok)"
> which includes the screenplay along with lots of extras like the first
> draft, behind the scenes pics and lots more.

I have an ASCII version, so there are no pics; however it includes
changes from the first draft to the production script. Also, the
production script version varies slightly from the actual movie dialog,
as some scenes were slightly altered on the fly. I don't have a trans-
cription of the actual movie dialog.

Cary Kittrell

unread,
May 7, 2001, 9:26:59 AM5/7/01
to
In article <3af3...@monitor.lanset.com> "Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> writes:
<Hmm... when someone says something so puzzling I wish I had access to their
<mind. What on earth are you talking about?
<
<She-bears? Do you mean she bears were the last thing you were laughing at?
<(If not, sorry for this next statement) When I said this, I meant laugh like
<they were laughing at Noah when went into the Ark, or misplaced laughing.
<She-bears is not necessarily misplaced laughing.
<


You had said:

Yes, laugh little children! Laugh! God will hear your
laughing and come down to see what you are laughing at.
And if it happens to be some poor kid who got pushed
into the mud, or maybe some prophet of His who is telling
you the truth like Jesus, what do you suppose God will do
to those who are laughing?

And my reply ("it was bears last time") refers to:

23 And [Elisha] went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the
way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him,
and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.

24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of
the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare
forty and two children of them.

(second Kings)


<Hmm... the second part is do what? You must mean something not good. Does
<this imply you would not think highly of a god who does something bad to
<someone for laughing at she-bears? I'm sorry, please let me know what you
<meant because I'm just not able to discern it.
<

I meant I don't think too much of a god who would have bears maul
little kids merely for making fun of Elisha's bald head (and
I say that as someone who can understand his problem)


Cary Kittrell

unread,
May 7, 2001, 11:39:24 AM5/7/01
to
In article <Jm1J6.194$Hw5....@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> "the answer guy" <jlj...@lljjlkll.com> writes:
<
<"Cary Kittrell" <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
<news:9culo7$ced$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...
<> In article <PrzI6.1638$Hk.1...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> "the
<answer guy" <jlj...@lljjlkll.com> writes:
<> <
{...}

<> <
<> <Clever guy, that slopdog.
<> <
<> <There are two surefire ways to tell if Ennis is the author of a post.
<> <
<> <1. He uses the same epithets when insulting someone, such as fool and
<> <faggot.
<> <
<> <2. The post supports slopdog.
<> <
<> <
<>
<> I really don't think so. Solly can't find his way from one end of a
<sentence
<> to the other, at least not in writing; this boy writes just fine.
<> AND he uses using actual punctuation marks. And standard capitalization.
<> Plus, he's a real sweetie compared to $OLLOG -- calling you a "fool"
<> after a certain amount of provocation is pretty much net.standard (sad
<> to say), whereas SOLLOG comes out firing "MORON" and "limp-dick viagra
<> taking faggot" if you fail to fall down and worship Him from the get-go.
<>
<
<Sloppy reserves the crude writing style for his "NINE" series sock puppets.
<As evidenced by his JP Essene persona Sloppy can package his lunacy in
<pretty words. Leo Phoenix's convoluted prophecy revisionism and the copycat
<design of his website bear the definite stamp of a Sloppydog sockpuppet.
<
<

I do remember reading his "translation" of Genesis. I don't think
it was actually anywhere in the neighborhood of a translation, but
the language was good enough that I wondered where he had stolen
it. Pherhaps I don't give him enough credit. On the other hand,
look how laughable his attempts to sound lyrical in the May 1st
post were. Junior high level.


Yep, it's a puzzler, all right.


=-=

Ed Augusts

unread,
May 7, 2001, 12:18:47 PM5/7/01
to

Cary Kittrell wrote:

Great variations in style and content are quite likely, in fact, if a 'multiple personality disorder' is one of
'Sloppy's' problems. What if he has a dozen different personalities, and they all take turns getting on the
computer and being (or commenting about) the Slobovian Dog and his prophecies. Some of Slappy Log's most loud
critics might even be just one or two of his 'multiples', just anything to discuss Slob Magog some more.

[three crossposted newsgroups excised]


Cary Kittrell

unread,
May 7, 2001, 11:46:42 AM5/7/01
to
In article "Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> writes:
<
<Moley <Mo...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com> wrote in message
<news:3AF3B295...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com...
<>
{...}

<>
<> So if it has "NOTHING to do with the calendar", why go to the trouble of
<even
<> mentioning the Celtic Calendar and trying to post-dict the date by use of
<> comparisons between the Gregorian and Celtic calendars, extrapolating
<lucky
<> triple sevens and in-between days etc.?
<
<That is just to harden the hearts of skeptics as I said before. The day
<given can mean anything, but we only know what we have been given. It is
<only through the spirit one can discern True truth, for anything can
<seemingly be true.
<>

Don't you ever wonder what kind of god would "hardern the hearts",
and then turn around and punish people for being unable to believe?
Hardening Pharoah's heart so that he would not let the Jews go,
and then turning around and killing everybody's kids because
he didn't?


=-=

Ed Augusts

unread,
May 7, 2001, 12:34:55 PM5/7/01
to

Cary Kittrell wrote:

This is a very interesting theme, and I've been known to comment very
critically on Bible lore before. But at this point, I think you should take
this to one of the other newsgroups you are crossposting where religious dogma,
studies of the calendar, etc., are more welcome, and leave
"sci.geo.earthquakes" out of it! --e.a.

[3 crossposted newsgroups removed!]


Ed Augusts

unread,
May 7, 2001, 12:46:24 PM5/7/01
to

jha amin wrote:

With someone of Ennis' nature, it becomes paramount to introduce 'prophecies'
into the court records to try desperately to avoid even thinking about his
responsiblity for the crimes he was accused of, to try to keep his own enormous
ego from being shattered by having to come face to face with being a mere
mortal, and a very troubled one, at that! --e.a.

[3 newsgroups excised! Of course this excision means my comments most likely
won't make it back to the original poster, but, Oh, well!]


Marcus S. Turner

unread,
May 7, 2001, 2:53:54 PM5/7/01
to

Cary Kittrell <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:9d67r3$npp$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...

> 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name
of
> the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and
tare
> forty and two children of them.
>
> (second Kings)

Just looked it up and It's Kings II 2:34.

The only reason I looked it up was the reference to bears - I got a bear
interest going on right now and I'm trying to learn as much as I can.

I was not aware of any species of bear got that far South of Europe or West
of Asia. Cave bears for sure, but I was under the impression they died out
prior to civilization.

Anybody got an idea on what kind of bears these may have been?

Hmmm, Perhaps a better question would be "Anybody got an idea on what kind
of bears these may have been in the area, regardless of the accuracy of
this account?


Cary Kittrell

unread,
May 7, 2001, 3:10:48 PM5/7/01
to
In article <6aCJ6.163$VF4....@news2.atl> "Marcus S. Turner" <msha...@bellsouth.net> writes:
<
<Cary Kittrell <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
<news:9d67r3$npp$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...
<> 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of
<> the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and
<. tare forty and two children of them.

<>
<> (second Kings)
<
<Just looked it up and It's Kings II 2:34.
<
<The only reason I looked it up was the reference to bears - I got a bear
<interest going on right now and I'm trying to learn as much as I can.
<
<I was not aware of any species of bear got that far South of Europe or West
<of Asia. Cave bears for sure, but I was under the impression they died out
<prior to civilization.
<
<Anybody got an idea on what kind of bears these may have been?

she-bears (_Ursus gynecos_).

Actually, if you find out, I'd be interested in hearing about it too.
What are the old world bears that we've all heard about? Bear-baiting
bears, gypsy dancing bears, better-be-good-or-you'll-get-et bears?
Could these by the same ones?

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 7, 2001, 4:17:21 PM5/7/01
to

"Thomas S. McDonald" <ts...@wwt.net> wrote in message
news:cfSI6.1367$Gi4....@reggie.win.bright.net...

> Dear T. E.,
> LOL! I just watched _Monty Python and the Holy Grail on
> DVD, and for the first time saw it with subtitles. Man, had
> I missed a lot! Do you have a copy of the script to go
> from, or do you have the whole thing by heart?

There's tons of websites devoted to the subject which post everything you
could ever wish to know.

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 7, 2001, 5:32:28 PM5/7/01
to

"Cary Kittrell" <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:9d6rvo$12j$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...

> Actually, if you find out, I'd be interested in hearing about it too.
> What are the old world bears that we've all heard about? Bear-baiting
> bears, gypsy dancing bears, better-be-good-or-you'll-get-et bears?
> Could these by the same ones?

As far as dancing bears go, I believe they're black bears which were common
throughout Europe. Ditto for the bears of fairy tales which tend to
originate in Europe. It's not a stretch to think that some bears might also
have been found naturally in ancient Palestine, though I don't know this
factually.

Don't forget also that even 'back then' much trade went on and animal
oddities were introduced out of their native environments for the amusement
of royalty and people in general.


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 7, 2001, 5:34:22 PM5/7/01
to

"jha amin" <jha_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:g8lJ6.3824$vg1.2...@www.newsranger.com...

> Yep (somewhat red faced), you are right.
> This was the trial with the prophecies in the court records.
> Guess that is why it took four days.
> I would love to see that transcript.

It's probably a good thing I wasn't there in person. I'd have been thrown
out for laughing, methinks.


Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 7, 2001, 6:21:16 PM5/7/01
to

"Der Coach" <DerC...@GotATinFoilHat.gov> wrote in message
news:3AF4B887...@GotATinFoilHat.gov...
> > And you count ME as the masses?
>
> No. I count you as an idiot.

heehhehehehehhehehehe


Ed Augusts

unread,
May 7, 2001, 7:18:24 PM5/7/01
to

Sylvesterthekat wrote:

Sylvesterthekat, I was raked over the coals in the last few days by a couple
of anxious lurkers because I dared to crosspost to a non-scientific newsgroup.
Can we arrive at some kind of consensus about this? The difficulty, as I see
it, is that if you are responding to someone who crossposted, that person may
never see your post at all if you delete the crossposts. Any hints on this
would be appreciated, you've obviously been doing this longer than I have.

[In the meantime, I have deleted 3 crossposted newsgroups from this message!]
--e.a.


Ed Augusts

unread,
May 7, 2001, 7:02:02 PM5/7/01
to

Sylvesterthekat wrote:

SUBTITLES fo Monty Python & the Hoary Gale? WHY!!?? I know there's lots
of muttering and nattering and Middle-English-sounding verbage in the
background -- do the subtitles really bring all of that out??

[3 crossposted newsgroups removed
by mandate of the people...]


Ed Augusts

unread,
May 7, 2001, 7:31:12 PM5/7/01
to

Sylvesterthekat wrote:

Damnit! I forgot what I was going to say!

My Mom remembers bears very well from her days in the Ural Mountains during
WWI and the first years of the Revolution. The mountains were full of
rending, fierce hungry bears -- and also packs of ferocious wolves that would
follow sleighs and troikas at night, their eyes luminescent eyes gleaming,
hoping for some kid to fall off the sleigh. She went off into the forest one
summer's day in search of a bear, without success. She said there were also
numerous snakes in the Urals, there were places that she described that
sounded like an Indiana Jones movie, "alive" with snakes! This was not too
terribly far from the site of the "Tunguska Event" of a few years earlier.

I actually don't believe bears, black or otherwise, were found in ancient
Palestine, or there'd be references to them in the Bible., and I defy someone
to recall the mention of a "bear" in that hoary and seer book, although I
hope I'm wrong because I love mention of exotic animals from 'way back when',
one animal that surely did exist in Olden Days thereabouts was the lion,
probably a close relative of the African lion, not a good thing to have
camping in your neighborhood.. --e.a.

[3 newsgroup crossposts snipped, but it's their loss!]

Here we get into true weirdness, but the "Lilith" (mistranslated by King
James' scribes as a "screech owl") is in the O.T., the weirdest creature
other than the Leviathan or behemoth. It is a half-human, female, clawed,
seducer and devourer of helpless humans, a kind of succubus. (I always liked
succubi and left the window open as a kid wishing one would visit me!) Lilith
lore is vast and a search for "Lilith" using Altavista, say, will yield a
night's full of reading.


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 7, 2001, 3:17:53 PM5/7/01
to

Thomas S. McDonald <ts...@wwt.net> wrote in message

news:%tpJ6.1406$Gi4....@reggie.win.bright.net...


>
> "Leo Pheonix" <l...@lanset.com(remove)> wrote in message
> news:3af5...@monitor.lanset.com...
> >
> > Moley <Mo...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com> wrote in message
> > news:3AF3B295...@Spurious.Junk.net.org.com...
> > >

> > > BTW. What date is it today on this new "prophetic
> calendar" that you've
> > > entered into the discussion? 12th of Never?
> >
> > The 113th day of the 13th year before the end of the
> world. Count the days
> > yourself, but time is irrelivant as the days near. BTW,
> this is not
> > according to me, but I do believe the prophet who spoke
> it.
>
> Dear Leo Pheonix,

Look Sir, you could start by addressing Sollog's name correctly in all your
posts if you want me to continue talking to you.

> Let me get this straight. If today (which, when you
> posted the reply, as it show on my news server, the date in
> the common calendar was May 6, 2001) is the 113th day of the
> year -13 BEW (before the end of the world), can we assume
> that the prophetic calendar is something like 13 days behind
> the common calendar?

You certainly have the right idea, but I did mean the 113th day, not 113
days, so I did mean the 5th, the day I made the post, but the 6th is 113
calendar days.

> Adding the days from the beginning of
> the common year to May 6, I come up with 126 days. If the
> "prophetic calendar" shows 113 days gone in its year, that

> would seem to say that whatever date Sollog gives in his


> predicitons should be read as occuring 13 days _after_ the
> Gregorian date given, if S. uses the common months but
> transposes dates to the prophetic calendar. If so, does

> that mean that a Sollog "hit" dated May 1 should really hit


> May 14 in the Gregorian calendar?

I have no idea what Sollog had intented or if he was even using the
prophetic calendar. As we've already seen he used the Celtic Calendar on the
March 21st prophecy. There is not any major reason to believe he used it
again for the May day prophecy except it is a Celtic holiday and some other
things, but God knows. It doesn't seem like anything could sway a skeptics
to believe it wasn't a miss.

> And, if this is so, how does the alleged "celtic
> calendar", which I for one think is an invention or
> misinterpretation by Sol., fit into the mix?

You think its an invention? Are you that dense? Didn't you read what I said
about it? How it is the Dead Sea Scrolls Calendar? How it is the true Jewish
calendar of the Celts? The ecclessiastical Jewish 13 month calendar, the
same one the Celts used? If you want to say crap like how you think it is an
invention of Sollog, at least learn your facts you lying twit! You are
misleading everyone else who doesn't know any better than you. You will be
held more accountable for your lies because you are misleading the innocent
through your own ignorance!

> I'm just trying to get a handle on the mysteries you
> present regarding this matter of calendars, with the object
> of seeing if there may be a true mystical reading possible,

> or if, as the evidence to date suggests to me, Sollog is


> just making it up as he goes along.

Well, seems you almost came to the light Tom, but alas you are a child of
the dark. If you had only believed the thing you started with, for it would
have lead you to the truth, but alas you believe it is all a joke. Perhaps
you will not think so in in 13 years, or perhaps by then you will just not
think, for you will be not.

> Peace,
> Tom McDonald
>


Leo Pheonix

unread,
May 7, 2001, 3:17:54 PM5/7/01
to
Ok, I understand now. You don't think God's judgment on the 42 children is
just? As I said, it wont be good, and neither were the she-bears God sent to
destroy those evil children of the dark!

Because you are having a hard time understanding this, let me put this in
perspective:

Someone has cancer. Instead of doing the wise thing, and healing themselves
via hot/cold water therapy, they decide to undergo radiation therapy, which
will make their hair fall out and eventually kill them. This person becomes
bald. They go to a public market and some children see them and giggle,
perhaps in innocence and playfulness and not for any evil reasons, or
because their parents brainwashed them to laugh at those who are different,
which would be evil.

Scenario two:

It is known that God makes some of his prophets bald in the Old Testament.
Elisha, Jonah, and again in the future according to the book of Zechariah,
when they will wear wigs to hide this fact. Elisha is not hiding this fact,
because he is doing God's Will, and then come 42 EVIL children of EVIL
parents out of the city to MOCK Elisha (it doesn't say they were laughing,
but they were probably laughing and mocking like those who laughed at
Noah... obviously not innocently) and Elisha CURSES all of them in God's
name. Remember what Jesus said, "Whosoever shall not doubt in his heart, but
shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall
have whatsoever he saith." [ Mark 11:23] This is very similar to what Elisha
did, he cursed the children, and God took care of them. It was not, as you
say, simply because they were making fun on his bald head. I don't know who
is dumb enough to fall for that lie, but it is obviously because they were
mocking his prophet status and God's power by doing so.

Cary Kittrell <ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message

news:9d67r3$npp$1...@news.ccit.arizona.edu...

Sylvesterthekat

unread,
May 8, 2001, 1:11:36 PM5/8/01
to

"Ed Augusts" <mysti...@icnetco.com> wrote in message
news:3AF729A8...@icnetco.com...

> Sylvesterthekat, I was raked over the coals in the last few days by a
couple
> of anxious lurkers because I dared to crosspost to a non-scientific
newsgroup.
> Can we arrive at some kind of consensus about this? The difficulty, as I
see
> it, is that if you are responding to someone who crossposted, that person
may
> never see your post at all if you delete the crossposts. Any hints on
this
> would be appreciated, you've obviously been doing this longer than I have.
>
> [In the meantime, I have deleted 3 crossposted newsgroups from this
message!]
> --e.a.

I believe I already made reference to this in another post. If I know the
person I'm responding to reads this particular newsgroup, I will remove the
crosspostings. Because I have no way of knowing which group the persons I
was responding to are actually reading, I left the cross postings there in
this instance. You will notice that I usually remove them in all other
instances.


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages