I'm a Queer Conscientious Objector
Chief Thracian
REFUSE TO SERVE A HOMOPHOBIC NATION.
---
A true Amerikan is a hetero-Amerikan.
Seig Heil!
http;//surf.to/gaybible
Stan Rothwell
prancing up to the Taliban and tell them that, and see how
much tolerance and understanding you get out of them... :O|
Chief Thracian
<roth...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>You threatening me? Stay out of my mailbox, loser.
>You know your mailbox provider has already talked
>to you about this. Shall we send them another e-mail,
>and let them know that you are violating their terms?
You are the one carrying out threats. Just fuck off, or you'll get
badly burned. That's a simple law of karma. If there are any threats
going on, you are doing them on yourself, Twinky.
I have never sent any mail to your mailbox, until you started posting
directly to me, you hetero scum. The only reason you get my mail, has
to be that you have your newsreader set up to forward Usenet mail to
your mailbox. That is your problem, dimwit, not mine. I assure you: I
will continue to post you a message, for every one you send me. That's
just the way the cookie crumbles; too bad for you, breeder-scum. This
is not "spam" by any stretch of the imagination. Accusing me of such,
puts you in serious violation of your Internet service, by wasting
time of admistrators on frivolous matters; alarming them when there
really is no need for alarm. Like shouting "fire" in a theater, you
are guilty of a serious violation that could land you in jail, or at
least with a stiff fine. (And a fine is the only way you could ever
get "stiff"...oh, there is one more way I can think of, and it
certainly has naught to do with the sex organ...which I'm sure on you,
is deformed, tiny, and scabrous.)
Furthermore, you freely dump mail into my mailbox, yet you hold a
double-standard, and complain when I respond. You started this battle,
but you messed with the wrong person this time around. So go ahead and
poop your little diapers out all over yourself...it will never impress
me. It never has.
You did not get that message from Runbox: they are on my side. You
wrote that up yourself.
Runbox is stepping on a field of landmines, and they know it. They can
get in big trouble banning me, based on false complaints. They already
apologized for even considering the complaints of obvious homophobes.
You're just the latest, sorry idiot. So be free to defame me further:
I will have the last laugh. Always had, always will.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chief Thracian" <chieft...@runbox.com>
To: "Stan Rothwell" <roth...@ix.netcom.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: I'm a Queer Conscientious Objector
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:27:07 -0700, in alt.politics.radical-left you
wrote:
>That must be a PC term for cowardly faggot. Hey, Zecky, try
>prancing up to the Taliban and tell them that, and see how
>much tolerance and understanding you get out of them... :O|
Anyone who uses the term "faggot" should have his throat slit...or at
least be locked away for a very, very long time. As for
"prancing"...well, no, I walk proudly. And I have no fear of the
Taliban, or anyone else for that matter. I have been challenging the
Beast of Homophobia for many years now. And it will be my great honor
to stand before the Taliban and spit in their faces. I look forward to
it.
You are no better than the Taliban, by perpetrating the same kind of
gay-hatred they do. Likewise, I will gain great pleasure by spitting
in your ugly hetero face!
Stan Rothwell
"Chief Thracian" <chieft...@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:b59lqtk9ooj8gt2nb...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:57:55 -0700, "Stan Rothwell"
> <roth...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >You threatening me? Stay out of my mailbox, loser.
> >You know your mailbox provider has already talked
> >to you about this. Shall we send them another e-mail,
> >and let them know that you are violating their terms?
>
> You are the one carrying out threats.
Oh, I am? Examples, please.
> Just fuck off, or you'll get
> badly burned. That's a simple law of karma. If there are any threats
> going on, you are doing them on yourself, Twinky.
You telling me you didn't post the following?
>Anyone who uses the term "faggot" should have his throat slit
Sorry, but you're losing it, Zecky...
> I have never sent any mail to your mailbox, until you started posting
> directly to me, you hetero scum.
Sorry, you started this.
>The only reason you get my mail, has
> to be that you have your newsreader set up to forward Usenet mail to
> your mailbox.
No, it is not. If it were, I would have hundreds of posts
in my mailbox. The fact that stuff winds up in my mailbox,
but not on the NG, suggests that you are replying to ME
instead of the NG. Perhaps YOU are the one who needs
to learn how to post???
> That is your problem, dimwit, not mine. I assure you: I
> will continue to post you a message, for every one you send me.
Sorry, but I have received far more than I sent (which
were all replies, BTW).
> That's
> just the way the cookie crumbles; too bad for you, breeder-scum. This
> is not "spam" by any stretch of the imagination. Accusing me of such,
> puts you in serious violation of your Internet service,
Then tell them that. You already came off as a kook with Runbox,
but if you want to shoot yourself in the foot further, be my guest.
> by wasting
> time of admistrators on frivolous matters; alarming them when there
> really is no need for alarm. Like shouting "fire" in a theater, you
> are guilty of a serious violation that could land you in jail, or at
> least with a stiff fine.
You're smoking some strong shit, Zecky. You gonna tell them
that I am part of a wave of attacks that's going to overrun the
planet, like you did the first time??? :O)
> (sexual references snipped....keep that shit to yourself)
>
> Furthermore, you freely dump mail into my mailbox, yet you hold a
> double-standard, and complain when I respond.
No dumping is occurring. The only things I have mailed you
have been replies to your e-mails, asking you not to post.
> You started this battle,
> but you messed with the wrong person this time around. So go ahead and
> poop your little diapers out all over yourself...it will never impress
> me. It never has.
>
> You did not get that message from Runbox: they are on my side. You
> wrote that up yourself.
If I did, then forward it to them, and tell them I made it up.
I shared their reply to me with you, I would love to see
what they tell you... :O)
> Runbox is stepping on a field of landmines, and they know it. They can
> get in big trouble banning me, based on false complaints. They already
> apologized for even considering the complaints of obvious homophobes.
> You're just the latest, sorry idiot. So be free to defame me further:
> I will have the last laugh. Always had, always will.
They are hoping you will go away once they start
charging got the service - LMAO... :O)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chief Thracian" <chieft...@runbox.com>
> To: "Stan Rothwell" <roth...@ix.netcom.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:17 PM
> Subject: Re: I'm a Queer Conscientious Objector
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:27:07 -0700, in alt.politics.radical-left you
> wrote:
>
> >That must be a PC term for cowardly faggot. Hey, Zecky, try
> >prancing up to the Taliban and tell them that, and see how
> >much tolerance and understanding you get out of them... :O|
>
> Anyone who uses the term "faggot" should have his throat slit...or at
> least be locked away for a very, very long time.
Once again, you're the one with the threats...
> And I have no fear of the
> Taliban, or anyone else for that matter. I have been challenging the
> Beast of Homophobia for many years now. And it will be my great honor
> to stand before the Taliban and spit in their faces. I look forward to
> it.
Go for it. You need airfare? I might be willing to donate
some frequent-flyer miles (one way, of course) to help
you out...
> You are no better than the Taliban, by perpetrating the same kind of
> gay-hatred they do. Likewise, I will gain great pleasure by spitting
> in your ugly hetero face!
Proof that you're a nutcase, Zecky...
annie
> Gays! GLBT's! Queers!
>
> REFUSE TO SERVE A HOMOPHOBIC NATION.
Here's a couple of thoughts......
How many gays, lesbians, and bi-sexuals do you suppose lost their lives
in the WTC?
What do you think of the report, published late last week, that the
armed services are considering relaxing the ban on gay recruits?
Do you think the Taliban, which will not even allow women education or
jobs, will treat you any better than the U.S. does?
I support your refusal to serve, btw. I have always thought that those
who do not wish to fight for religious or philosophical reasons should
not be required to do so. But really, your polemic (short though it is)
loses power when it is considered that there is no draft, and that thus
your statement that you wish C.O. status is a nice statement of belief
but not necessary beyond that. I don't think there will be a draft on
this war. We have justice on our side. We were, after all, directly
attacked. People have been, and probably will be, forming lines to sign
up.
Oh, and btw, to all you folks......
I'm a leftist liberal, and have been all of my adult life. However, I
have brains enough to know the difference between a just war and an
unjust one. I stand behind the president in his actions, I am pleased
at his restraint in very trying circumstances, and I will support the
actions taken by our country against terrorists, terrorist
organizations, terrorist fronts, and those government who support and
shelter terrorists. I have always been proud of my country, and
intelligent enough to realize that as a country and a government made up
of human beings, who are fallible, that mistakes will be made in varying
degrees of magnitude. Have we ever, as a country, made mistakes and
ill-considered moves? Yes. But in most circumstances, our hearts have
been in the right place and we have done our level best to avoid harming
civilians in our actions. We are not the Great Satan that bin Laden
and various Americans would paint us as.
We're just people, but people who, for the most part and in the
majority, wish the same things for the rest of the world that we have
here: freedom in all its permutations.
I could not have expressed this as well as I wished were it not for my
Humanities degree (M.A. in English Literature).
Annie an...@rt66.com
--
All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall
be well.
- Julian of Norwich