Bush: "Final Solution" for Gays?
Jim FL
vision for gay and lesbian Americans. His statements are clear enough and
can only end in
one result---the total elimination of all civil rights and freedoms for
every gay and lesbian
in this country.
Thie latest and most horrific example of George W. Bush’s overt hostility to
gays and
constitutional rights occured recently in an interview with a panel from the
Madison
Project, a conservative political action committee. As reported in
Right-wing columnist
Cal Thomas’s Oct. 5th column, Governor Bush was asked by former Colorado
Senator
William Armstrong whether Bush thought it was okay for an ambassador and
department
heads to be openly homosexual.about his policy on hiring gay people. Bush’s
answer was
that he would not “knowingly” appoint a “practicing homosexual” but he would
not fire
someone if he was subsequently discovered to be gay. To that, Armstrong
reported said,
“I wish he had nailed that down a little more.” Armstrong’s point about Bush
’s reluctance
to fire those discovered after being hired reminds me of how Jews in the
German civil
service with honorable World War I records were not immediately fired after
Hitler’s
accession to power in 1933.
That such a policy comes from a front running candidate for president of the
United States
should thoroughly outrage and disgust every decent law abiding American. To
declare that
for no other reason than a person’s sexual orientation, a citizen is
disqualified from
holding a federal position is blatant bigotry of the first order. Should we
wonder if Mr.
Bush believes that openly gay people should not hold any federal job? Does
he presume
that gay people are unfit to hold any job in this country? What jobs are gay
people fit to
hold? Does it not follow that gay people should be cut out of the economy
altogether?
What then is to be their fate? Reduction to abject poverty? Elimination from
society?
Liquidation?
These are legitimate questions that must be asked in response to Mr. Bush’s
statements.
Bush’s policy takes the common conservative battlecry of “no special rights”
and reveals
that the goal anti-gay bigots have in their hearts but are not quite yet
become bold enough to
proclaim is “no civil rights whatsoever!”
By the way, I am a registered Republican and active in the Log Cabin
Republicans. I choose to stay and fight for the soul of the Republican party
rather than abandon the once "Grand Old Party" to the slime of populist
demogogues. Where are the REAL conservatives of the caliber of Barry
Goldwater?
Jim in Florida
Samantha
Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual preversion?
Jim FL <flji...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:x_zM3.1647$tZ4....@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...
John De Salvio
> When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
> Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual preversion?
Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
--
John
NOTE: "From" address is deliberately wrong.
My correct e-mail address is:
desalvio["AT" SYMBOL]monitor.net
Samantha
John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message
news:desalvo-1210...@rp06.pm3.monitor.net...
> In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha" <sye...@calweb.com>
wrote:
>
> > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
>
> Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
If gay people would stop defameing the American flag with rainbow colors and
if gay people would stop screaming persecution based on their grotesque
sexual interests. These irritations have answered both of your refutes with
proof. When will gays act like civilized people. This IS the problem. I
personally have been passed for promotion based on a political action
initiated by a gay whom did not have the credentials (schooling) or for that
matter a knowlege of the buisness. I quit... and then he was fired a few
months later...
Oh! Grotesque... Here goes... America flurished far better after the sewers
were designed to remove refuse from the living area's. This has been the
greatest invention to stop sickness and health hazzards. A place to stick
the penis.... This has resulted in masive health issues. Penises do not
belong in the butt. You would have to work in a hospital to understand my
anger.
Removeing living animals from the rectums among many other projectiles have
become a really sickening job. The diseases that are found in the gay
population rival those found hundereds of years ago. All because the actions
they generically preform are done unclean. Thus, transmittance levels based
on the orfices of choice are increased. Not to mention the psychological
AVERAGES have provided proof that a extremely high level of gay's are
instable. This does support the higher averages of interveinious drug use
that has aided the AIDS and HEP. I do understand their are 'clean' gays...
ect. But lets look at the majority. You are pushing the minority versus the
majority issues down the majorities throats. And you wonder why there is
name calling?
So your position is:
Gays deserve more laws than the rest of us because they cannot control their
urges to profess their sexuality. Thus identifies they require more laws to
survive. Or because people are aware of the incorrectness of things
returning to the exit of the human body... Or they need more support because
they have created infestations of AIDS, HEP, ect... due to their bloody
abuse of the EXIT of the human body....
Samantha
John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message news:desalvo->
> Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
Name calling.... So sad.. Try acting civil and people would not have the
opportunity.
> > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
preversion?
>
> Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
>
> Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
Do you need physical education again? The rectum's design was to remove
waist not to provide a penis a warm disease ridden hole. The mouth isn't
really clean either but at least it can be used correctly. The lower
intestine is extremely grotesque. Thus it's use is grotesque.
Simple? Reality is in the eye of the beholder... But some things should be
common sense....
-=Cy
eric lee williams
Samantha <sye...@calweb.com> wrote in message
news:38035...@news.calweb.com...
> Simpler version....
> John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message news:desalvo->
>
> > Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
>
> Name calling.... So sad.. Try acting civil and people would not have the
> opportunity.
>
>
> > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> preversion?
> >
> > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> >
> > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
>
> Do you need physical education again? The rectum's design was to remove
> waist
You on a diet?
not to provide a penis a warm disease ridden hole. The mouth isn't
> really clean either but at least it can be used correctly. The lower
> intestine is extremely grotesque. Thus it's use is grotesque.
> Simple? Reality is in the eye of the beholder... But some things should be
> common sense....
>
Apparently you lack 'common sense'. Your depiction of a necessary functional
organ reveals only your ignorant, bigoted bias typical of christians who are
filled with stupid ideas...
Dennis Kemmerer
BTW, if you're experiencing any of the problems you mention below due to
having anal sex, I'm sure your doctor can tell you what you're doing wrong.
Some basic education might also help you. It's been quite a while since I've
seen so much misinformation and so many myths and stereotypes packed into so
few words.
'Defamation of the American flag' ... _that's_ a new one.
Samantha <sye...@calweb.com> wrote in message
news:38035...@news.calweb.com...
>
> John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message
> news:desalvo-1210...@rp06.pm3.monitor.net...
> > In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha" <sye...@calweb.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
> >
> > Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
>
> > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> preversion?
> >
> > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> >
> > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
> >
Wahre Arbeit
> John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message
> news:desalvo-1210...@rp06.pm3.monitor.net...
> > In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha" <sye...@calweb.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
> >
> > Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
>
> If gay people would stop defameing the American flag with rainbow colors
and
> if gay people would stop screaming persecution based on their grotesque
> sexual interests. These irritations have answered both of your refutes
with
> proof. When will gays act like civilized people. This IS the problem. I
> personally have been passed for promotion based on a political action
> initiated by a gay whom did not have the credentials (schooling) or for
that
> matter a knowlege of the buisness. I quit... and then he was fired a few
> months later...
> Oh! Grotesque... Here goes... America flurished far better after the
sewers
> were designed to remove refuse from the living area's. This has been the
> greatest invention to stop sickness and health hazzards. A place to stick
> the penis.... This has resulted in masive health issues. Penises do not
> belong in the butt. You would have to work in a hospital to understand my
> anger.
You write like one of those people who holds hostages in a convenience store
and issues a list of psychotic demands.
See a psychiatrist .. and bring your toothbrush.
Rasmus Neikes
>
> When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
I dare you to quote where anyone said that they should!
Rasmus.
--
There was a point to this story, but it has temporarily escaped the
chronicler's mind. (D. Adams)
Really
of their bedrooms. Homoes can't have it both ways; they are polarising this
great nation with their public grotesquery like it hasn't been polarised since
1860...
Samantha wrote:
>
>John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message
>news:desalvo-1210...@rp06.pm3.monitor.net...
>> In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha" <sye...@calweb.com>
>wrote:
>>
>> > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
>>
>> Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
>
>If gay people would stop defameing the American flag with rainbow colors and
>if gay people would stop screaming persecution based on their grotesque
>sexual interests. These irritations have answered both of your refutes with
>proof. When will gays act like civilized people. This IS the problem. I
>personally have been passed for promotion based on a political action
>initiated by a gay whom did not have the credentials (schooling) or for that
>matter a knowlege of the buisness. I quit... and then he was fired a few
>months later...
> Oh! Grotesque... Here goes... America flurished far better after the sewers
>were designed to remove refuse from the living area's. This has been the
>greatest invention to stop sickness and health hazzards. A place to stick
>the penis.... This has resulted in masive health issues. Penises do not
>belong in the butt. You would have to work in a hospital to understand my
>anger.
>Removeing living animals from the rectums among many other projectiles have
>become a really sickening job. The diseases that are found in the gay
>population rival those found hundereds of years ago. All because the actions
>they generically preform are done unclean. Thus, transmittance levels based
>on the orfices of choice are increased. Not to mention the psychological
>AVERAGES have provided proof that a extremely high level of gay's are
>instable. This does support the higher averages of interveinious drug use
>that has aided the AIDS and HEP. I do understand their are 'clean' gays...
>ect. But lets look at the majority. You are pushing the minority versus the
>majority issues down the majorities throats. And you wonder why there is
>name calling?
> So your position is:
>
>Gays deserve more laws than the rest of us because they cannot control their
>urges to profess their sexuality. Thus identifies they require more laws to
>survive. Or because people are aware of the incorrectness of things
>returning to the exit of the human body... Or they need more support because
>they have created infestations of AIDS, HEP, ect... due to their bloody
>abuse of the EXIT of the human body....
>
>> > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
>preversion?
>>
Rasmus Neikes
>
> John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message
> news:desalvo-1210...@rp06.pm3.monitor.net...
> > In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha" <sye...@calweb.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
> >
> > Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
>
> If gay people would stop defameing the American flag with rainbow colors
Correct me if i am wrong, but isn't that a protected right?
and
> if gay people would stop screaming persecution based on their grotesque
> sexual interests.
Well, they ARE persecuted for what you imagine to be "grotesque".
Frankly, i don';t see where you'd get that notion in the first place.
_I_ don't spend my free trime looking throuygh other peolpe's bedroom
windows, but it appears that doesn't hold true for you...
These irritations have answered both of your refutes with
> proof.
In your mind...
> When will gays act like civilized people. This IS the problem.
What is it that gays do that you consider to be uncivilized? If a
randomly chosen person tells tou that he or she is gay - what precisely
is it that you then know about their behaviour?
I
> personally have been passed for promotion based on a political action
> initiated by a gay whom did not have the credentials (schooling) or for that
> matter a knowlege of the buisness. I quit... and then he was fired a few
> months later...
A am sure you are able to give us further details as wel las proof that
his alleged sexuality had ANYTHING to do with it, right?
> Oh! Grotesque... Here goes... America flurished far better after the sewers
> were designed to remove refuse from the living area's. This has been the
> greatest invention to stop sickness and health hazzards. A place to stick
> the penis.... This has resulted in masive health issues. Penises do not
> belong in the butt.
You are confusing homosexuality with anal sex. The two are not the same
thing. Get a clue!
> You would have to work in a hospital to understand my
> anger.
*ROTFLMAO*
bit presoumptuous, aren't we?
> Removeing living animals from the rectums among many other projectiles have
> become a really sickening job.
Ha ha ...
Ha ha ha...
Hee hee hoo ha...
BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
The diseases that are found in the gay
> population rival those found hundereds of years ago.
And you have bene working in hospitals back then ,too, right?
All because the actions
> they generically preform are done unclean. Thus, transmittance levels based
> on the orfices of choice are increased.
Out of curiosity: You DO realize that - despite talking complete and
utter bullshit - you are not talking about a representative sample i
nthe first place?
Not to mention the psychological
> AVERAGES have provided proof that a extremely high level of gay's are
> instable.
Who are the psychological averages? Is that a spin off from the avengers
or some such thing?
> This does support the higher averages of interveinious drug use
> that has aided the AIDS and HEP.
Which, of course, has NOTHING to do with sexuality.
> I do understand their are 'clean' gays...
> ect. But lets look at the majority.
As soon as you come up with a scientific method of identifying all gay
people we can talk, yes.
You are pushing the minority versus the
> majority issues down the majorities throats.
That is the point, yes. Being in the majority ddoes not give you
unlimited power over the minority.
> And you wonder why there is
> name calling?
Yes.
> So your position is:
>
> Gays deserve more laws than the rest of us because they cannot control their
> urges to profess their sexuality.
Wrong. Please do cite where you got this from. Cite ANY SINGLE law that
is supposed to give gays a singhle right that straights don't have. Just
one!
Thus identifies they require more laws to
> survive.
Bullshit.
Or because people are aware of the incorrectness of things
> returning to the exit of the human body...
And you claim you have worked in a hospital? You are telling us that you
have worked in the medical field whilst making the above statment and
thereby denying that enemas and suppositories have any use in the
medical field?
HA!
Or they need more support because
> they have created infestations of AIDS, HEP, ect... due to their bloody
> abuse of the EXIT of the human body....
Get a fucking clue!
>
> > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> preversion?
> >
> > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> >
> > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
How very interesting that you failed to respond to his second point...
Rasmus.
Turin
You will find, time and time again everytime you make the mistake of
working with them, that conservatives are the biggest, most unprincipled
fucking populist backstabbers in the whole political spectrum. Their
whole stance implies deception before they even do anything. Bigotry by
defintion derives from conservativism since conservativism is the
practice of keeping the status quo the way that it is, with only slow
grudging changes and *always* pandering to whoever the strongest
majority happens to be. It's also a philosophy of defeatism. You
*don't* have to work with them.
You say that you refuse to abandon the soul of the party, but what is
that soul? They've been nationalistic from the beginning which is the
antithesis of a modern free society that celebrates the individual.
They themselves will tell you that their first major issue of slavery
was only one in a barrel and could have gone the other way for politics
sake. "Saving the union" was Lincoln's prime directive - not the
*rights* of the individual. You see value in a soul like that?
Democrats are nothing but open mob rule, that borders on mafia, who are
probably far more responsible for the persecution of homosexuals - if
you get your eyes off of events in Washington for a bit, that is. And
libertarians are simply wishy-washy double-crossers to everybody who are
always doing good for themselves as long as they take an ambigous
stance. I agree with what you say about Bush, but you'll always be
playing catch up in the game of politics when you're the minority, no
matter what your party is. It's far better to work from the outside to
create and develop grass-roots movements. And to protect them, too.
Does anyone still believe that the ACLU is still about what it claims
anymore?
--
————————————————————————
Turin • http://www.fortunecity.com/rivendell/lair/129/
————————————————————————
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Ricky Ulrich
Samantha wrote in message <38035...@news.calweb.com>...
>
>Removeing living animals from the rectums among many other projectiles have
>become a really sickening job.
Honey, with an attitude like yours people might think that you have a few
animals up your sorry bigoted ass. I don't understand why people like you
have such a fascination with anal sex. According to you it must be
acceptable to be gay if a penis isn't entering a rectum, so I guess you
don't have any problems with lesbians either.
CWBarton
Turin wrote in message <7u0060$74e$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>Democrats are...
>probably far more responsible for the persecution of homosexuals... (than
Republicans)
An interesting statement. Can you provide an example to illustrate it?
CJ Watson
Jim FL wrote:
> The title may sound inflammatory
Correct.
> but I believe it reflects George W. Bush’s
> vision for gay and lesbian Americans.
You need to check your history to see who recommended a "Final Solution" and
what they avowed, first.
> His statements are clear enough and
> can only end in
> one result---the total elimination of all civil rights and freedoms for
> every gay and lesbian
> in this country.
How are any civil rights being denied to anyone now?
> Thie latest and most horrific example of George W. Bush’s overt hostility to
> gays and
> constitutional rights <snip>To
> declare that
> for no other reason than a person’s sexual orientation,
Strawman. He didn't say he was going to fire anyone based on sexual desires...
which cultic leftists hold so sacred. How would he go about firing someone on
the basis of their desires and "feelings"?
> a citizen is
> disqualified from
> holding a federal position is blatant bigotry of the first order.
This is blatant stupidity of the first order, and a liar's strawman to boot.
> Should we
> wonder if Mr.
> Bush believes that openly gay people should not hold any federal job? Does
> he presume
> that gay people are unfit to hold any job in this country?
How do you presume that "gay people" are defined? How is anyone supposed to
have beliefs about something idiot leftists won't even define?
> What jobs are gay
> people fit to
> hold?
What are "gay people"? Is that some element of your own collectivist psychotic
impulse?
> Does it not follow that gay people should be cut out of the economy
> altogether?
Duh.
How is it that people who make homosexuality a way of life are so much wealthier
than average? What follows what?
> What then is to be their fate? Reduction to abject poverty?
You're ignorant.
> Elimination from
> society?
Stupid too.
> Liquidation?
Did I mention idiotic?
> These are legitimate questions that must be asked in response to Mr. Bush’s
> statements.
Those were illegitimate psychotic questions that Bush shouldn't even waste his
time with.
<snip>
--W
CJ Watson
John De Salvio wrote:
> In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha" <sye...@calweb.com> wrote:
>
> > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
>
> Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
It would be better if you quit proselytizing your cult with it's hedonistic sexual
desire identity so that young people don't continually seek out bigots who also
define people by such an identity.... Why would a young person be repeatedly self
destructive? Lies. Lies like the lies you proselytize.
> > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual preversion?
>
> Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
That seems to be a personal opinion.
> Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
In your opinion....
--W
Fenris
<den...@excite.com> wrote:
> 'Defamation of the American flag' ... _that's_ a new one.
Yeh, maybe we need a Consitutional Amendment to prohibit flag defamation. =)
--
To e-mail me replace "spamsucks" with "azstarnet.com"
Fenris
> Do you need physical education again? The rectum's design was to remove
> waist not to provide a penis a warm disease ridden hole. The mouth isn't
> really clean either but at least it can be used correctly.
Ay, Samantha! Your waist is relative to how much goes in your mouth! If
you use your mouth incorrectly, your waist gets out of control.
Robert Serrano
>
> John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message
> news:desalvo-1210...@rp06.pm3.monitor.net...
> wrote:
> >
> > > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
> >
> > Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
>
Now I realize that you probably don't actually have a clue, here, but
WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!!! There is an American Flag, and
a rainbow flag. I've yet to see this supposed Rainbow American Flag.
If I happen to purchase one of each, I am well within my rights to fly
them together.
> and
> if gay people would stop screaming persecution based on their grotesque
> sexual interests.
If Christian Fundamentalists would stop screaming persecution based on
their grotesque sexual interests.
> These irritations have answered both of your refutes with
> proof.
Nothing resembling proof in even the minutest of ways. Maybe you should
try taking that critical thinking class again.
> When will gays act like civilized people.
You say WE don't act like civilized people, and then you write this
garbage.
> This IS the problem. I
> personally have been passed for promotion based on a political action
> initiated by a gay whom did not have the credentials (schooling) or for that
> matter a knowlege of the buisness.
And you know this, how? Was it just because you thought the person who
did get the job was gay, and therefore couldn't possibly be as qualified
as you were? Did you even bother looking into the fact that your
attitude sucks? No, it couldn't possibly have been that, you're just
not the kind of person who'd look inward to find fault, are you?
> I quit... and then he was fired a few
> months later...
And? If you quit, you know nothing about the circumstances behind his
leaving, do you? And no, gossip from whatever (if any) friends you may
have had does not count.
> Oh! Grotesque... Here goes... America flurished far better after the sewers
> were designed to remove refuse from the living area's. This has been the
> greatest invention to stop sickness and health hazzards. A place to stick
> the penis.... This has resulted in masive health issues. Penises do not
> belong in the butt. You would have to work in a hospital to understand my
> anger.
> Removeing living animals from the rectums among many other projectiles have
> become a really sickening job. The diseases that are found in the gay
> population rival those found hundereds of years ago. All because the actions
> they generically preform are done unclean. Thus, transmittance levels based
> on the orfices of choice are increased. Not to mention the psychological
> AVERAGES have provided proof that a extremely high level of gay's are
> instable. This does support the higher averages of interveinious drug use
> that has aided the AIDS and HEP. I do understand their are 'clean' gays...
> ect. But lets look at the majority. You are pushing the minority versus the
> majority issues down the majorities throats. And you wonder why there is
> name calling?
So, in other words, you're either psychotic or simply so monumentally
dishonest (or stupid) that any excuse to go on and on without saying
anything of any real substance is a good one.
> So your position is:
>
> Gays deserve more laws than the rest of us because they cannot control their
> urges to profess their sexuality.
So your position is:
Fundamentalist Christians deserve more laws (RFRA etc) than the rest of
us because they cannot control their urges to profess their religion.
Thus identified, they require more laws to survive. Or because people
are aware of the incorrectness of saying that an all loving God hates a
certain group of people... Or they need more support because they have
created infestations of illiteracy, scientific ignorance, and a smug
self-importance that is so fragile that the very notion that they are
not the center of the Universe (and the only people who will be "saved")
will utterly destroy their entire world... due to their pig-ignorant
interpretations of a book that they claim must be taken literally in its
entirety.
> Thus identifies they require more laws to
> survive. Or because people are aware of the incorrectness of things
> returning to the exit of the human body... Or they need more support because
> they have created infestations of AIDS, HEP, ect... due to their bloody
> abuse of the EXIT of the human body....
Isn't it nice the way your own words can be used against you? Maybe you
should try using what little gray matter you have evidenced thus far
BEFORE you start spouting your ignorance the next time.
Rob
> > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> preversion?
> >
> > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> >
> > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
> >
Robert Serrano
>
> Simpler version....
>
> opportunity.
Amazing how those who act the least civil are the ones most likely to
tell others to act civil. Hey, if you can't take it, you shouldn't try
dishing it out.
> > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> preversion?
> >
> > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> >
> > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
>
> Do you need physical education again? The rectum's design was to remove
> waist not to provide a penis a warm disease ridden hole. The mouth isn't
> really clean either but at least it can be used correctly. The lower
> intestine is extremely grotesque.
And let's not even get into the vagina (pun intended). Look at all the
disgusting things that grow in there, all sorts of yeasties and other
scary beasties. And then, since YOU apparently missed even the most
rudimentary of sexual education courses. All of the reproductive organs
are dual-use. The penis and the vagina are both part of their
respective urinary systems, as well as being reproductive in nature. By
what stretch do you say that the anus cannot have a dual function. It
is an erogenous zone, having a large concentration of nerve endings.
And then let's get down to brass tacks. There ain't no sexual organ
that can be considered to be exactly "clean" no matter what you do. Sex
is always a great way to spread disease, of both minor and major
natures. But then, if you had any knowledge, you'd know this.
> Thus it's use is grotesque.
> Simple? Reality is in the eye of the beholder... But some things should be
> common sense....
You've exhibited neither a firm grasp on reality, nor much common
sense... So why should anyone bother talking to you?
Rob
Dennis Kemmerer
Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
news:3803C4DD...@csufresno.edu...
Wahre Arbeit
>Samantha wrote:
>>
>> ... You would have to work in a hospital to understand my
>> anger.
>> Removeing [sic ]living animals from the rectums among many other projectiles have
>> become a really sickening job. The diseases that are found in the gay
>> population rival those found hundereds of years ago. All because the actions
>> they generically preform are done unclean. Thus, transmittance levels based
>> on the orfices of choice are increased. Not to mention the psychological
>> AVERAGES have provided proof that a extremely high level of gay's are
>> instable. This does support the higher averages of interveinious drug use
>> that has aided the AIDS and HEP. I do understand their are 'clean' gays...
>> ect. But lets look at the majority. You are pushing the minority versus the
>> majority issues down the majorities throats. And you wonder why there is
>> name calling?
>So, in other words, you're either psychotic or simply so monumentally
>dishonest (or stupid) ...
I'll take "psychotic" for $800, Alex.
--
Chris Fox
Software Architect - WindowsNT/C++/MS SQL Server
http://home.earthlink.net/~chrisfox/
"God is the anthropomorphized Aesop character who represents the
culmination of all the guilt (i.e. vulnerability) we feel whenever
our own megalomaniacal self-support structure (sense of internal
reality control) fails to distract us from the dread of our imminent
demise."
-- Br0d Barkett
Billy Kennedy
>> become a really sickening job. The diseases that are found in the gay
The San Fernando Valley Folklore Society
Urban Legends Reference Pages
Synopsis: Contrary to widespread public belief, "gerbil-stuffing" is
unknown as an actual sexual practice, nor has a verified medical case
of a gerbil (or other rodent) having been extracted from a patient's
rectum ever been reported.
http://www.snopes.com/sex/homosex/gerbil.htm
>So, in other words, you're either psychotic or simply so monumentally
>dishonest (or stupid) that any excuse to go on and on without saying
>anything of any real substance is a good one.
And she works in a fantasy hospital...
or has been committed to one ;-)
James Doemer
>become a really sickening job.
>
Except for the fact that it has never happened.
James Doemer
Fenris <tto...@spamsucks.com> wrote in message
news:ttowne-1210...@dialup08ip056.tus.azstarnet.com...
> > waist not to provide a penis a warm disease ridden hole. The mouth isn't
> > really clean either but at least it can be used correctly.
>
> you use your mouth incorrectly, your waist gets out of control.
>
Samantha is indeed an intelligent soul! Or is that sole? Well, no sense
(since?), letting good brains go to waste... Or is that waist??
Not a Republican
until your attitude toward perversion changes. Perhaps they will not have
to use any of the electrical devices.
Post-modernist tolerance: You can believe what you want, but must act as if
they're right.
Dennis Kemmerer <den...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:7tvonp$no1$2...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> Samantha, honey, get some therapy for your obsession with others' sex
lives.
That's a tired dodge. It is in fact your insistence that others ratify your
perversion that is the obsession.
--
nar
Not a Republican
perversion a gross sexual perversion, instread of a 'valid alternative
lifestyle'. You have no alternative but to withstand the hissy fits of the
entire Pink Army. I just hope they don't scratch your eyes out.
--
nar
Samantha <sye...@calweb.com> wrote in message
news:38030...@news.calweb.com...
> When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
> Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
preversion?
> Jim FL <flji...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:x_zM3.1647$tZ4....@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...
> > The title may sound inflammatory but I believe it reflects George W.
> Bush's
> > vision for gay and lesbian Americans. His statements are clear enough
and
> > can only end in
> > one result---the total elimination of all civil rights and freedoms for
> > every gay and lesbian
> > in this country.
> >
> > Thie latest and most horrific example of George W. Bush's overt
hostility
> to
> > gays and
> To
> > declare that
> > for no other reason than a person's sexual orientation, a citizen is
> > disqualified from
> > holding a federal position is blatant bigotry of the first order. Should
> we
> > wonder if Mr.
> > Bush believes that openly gay people should not hold any federal job?
Does
> > he presume
> > that gay people are unfit to hold any job in this country? What jobs are
> gay
> > people fit to
> > hold? Does it not follow that gay people should be cut out of the
economy
> > altogether?
> > What then is to be their fate? Reduction to abject poverty? Elimination
> from
> > society?
> > Liquidation?
> >
> > These are legitimate questions that must be asked in response to Mr.
> Bush's
> > statements.
James Doemer
Wahre Arbeit <chri...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:7u0hcl$7dq$1...@ash.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> In article <3803C4DD...@csufresno.edu>, Robert Serrano
<rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote:
> >Samantha wrote:
> >>
>
> >> ... You would have to work in a hospital to understand my
> >> anger.
> >> Removeing [sic ]living animals from the rectums among many other
projectiles have
> >> become a really sickening job. The diseases that are found in the gay
> >> population rival those found hundereds of years ago. All because the
actions
> >> they generically preform are done unclean. Thus, transmittance levels
based
> >> on the orfices of choice are increased. Not to mention the
psychological
> >> AVERAGES have provided proof that a extremely high level of gay's are
> >> instable. This does support the higher averages of interveinious drug
use
> >> that has aided the AIDS and HEP. I do understand their are 'clean'
gays...
> >> ect. But lets look at the majority. You are pushing the minority
versus the
> >> majority issues down the majorities throats. And you wonder why there
is
> >> name calling?
>
> >So, in other words, you're either psychotic or simply so monumentally
>
> I'll take "psychotic" for $800, Alex.
>
And the answer is:
"Person who claims to work in a hospital that removed animals from people's
rectums
even though research of hospital records from across the country has
revealed no
such cases"
Robert Serrano
>
> Indeed, Samantha. You will have to be subjected to endless 'education'
> until your attitude toward perversion changes. Perhaps they will not have
> to use any of the electrical devices.
Or, as was the case with you, it will be clearly demonstrated over and
over again that she is a total freaking moron, and she'll slink off to
the side-lines to make what she thinks are smart remarks, but which
simply serve to reinforce what a moron she was in the first place.
> Post-modernist tolerance: You can believe what you want, but must act as if
> they're right.
I've already pointed out how this is a totally apt description of the
Religious Right. Care to try and make another go at saying that it
isn't?
> Dennis Kemmerer <den...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:7tvonp$no1$2...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> > Samantha, honey, get some therapy for your obsession with others' sex
> lives.
>
> That's a tired dodge. It is in fact your insistence that others ratify your
> perversion that is the obsession.
Since all you people seem to do is bring your rather lurid fantasies
about what it is that "we do" in our bedrooms, it is a completely valid
characterization. But then, you knew that, you just can't stand having
your nose rubbed in it.
Rob
Rob
Robert Serrano
>
> Uh-oh, Samantha. You've done it now. You've called a gross sexual
> perversion a gross sexual perversion, instread of a 'valid alternative
> lifestyle'. You have no alternative but to withstand the hissy fits of the
> entire Pink Army. I just hope they don't scratch your eyes out.
Uh-oh people, look who's back. And is samantha another one of your
stage-names, a drag-persona you bring out to make it look like there's
someone else out there who is even more lacking in the clue department
than you are? And I won't even go into the whole issue of people with a
gross sexual obsession with other people's sex lives calling other
people sex lives "gross sexual obsessions." Obviously you are really
hoping to get someone to explain, in explicit detail what it is that we
do in our own bedrooms, a truly bizarre phone-sex thing. Otherwise you
wouldn't be here making such an utter fool of yourself. Really, don't
think you're fooling anybody.
Rob
Rasmus Neikes
>
> Simpler version....
>
> opportunity.
Why don't you go ahead and simply LIST the behaviour of John that you
perosnally dissaprove of. Go ahead, I could sure do with another laugh
here...
>
> > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> preversion?
> >
> > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> >
> > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
>
> Do you need physical education again?
What does physical ed. have to do with your claim that homosexuals would
be asking for any sort of jobs based on ther sexuality?
The rectum's design was to remove
> waist not to provide a penis a warm disease ridden hole.
I suppose you have the original blueprints from the manufacturer; the
annotaded edition, yes?
The mouth isn't
> really clean either but at least it can be used correctly.
I am sure we'd all be very grateful if you could discuss your sexual
phantasies elswhere - other than that: Go tell your employer to fire
you! Vomiting is most certainly a normal usuage of the mouth, so you're
simply wrong again.
The lower
> intestine is extremely grotesque.
"grotesque"? What medical book did you find that explanation in?
> Thus it's use is grotesque.
Once you're unemployed and have loads of spare time: Take an intro
course in basic, formal logic...
> Simple? Reality is in the eye of the beholder... But some things should be
> common sense....
As they say: Common sense is neither.
But please.. DO tell us what it's like to live on a flat planet, will
ya?
Rasmus Neikes
>
> Aw, Rob, you're wasting your time - she's a moron.
>
> Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
> news:3803C4DD...@csufresno.edu...
> > Samantha wrote:
Maybe we should forgive her? Anyone looked at her posting history yet?
*G* We could just leave the poor kid alone and see what she's like after
she recovers...
Ras "on second though..." mus.
Douglas H. Wildoner
Rasmus Neikes wrote:
> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> >
> > Aw, Rob, you're wasting your time - she's a moron.
> >
> > Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
> > news:3803C4DD...@csufresno.edu...
> > > Samantha wrote:
>
> Maybe we should forgive her? Anyone looked at her posting history yet?
> *G* We could just leave the poor kid alone and see what she's like after
> she recovers...
>
> Ras "on second though..." mus.
>
> --
> There was a point to this story, but it has temporarily escaped the
> chronicler's mind. (D. Adams)
I personally wonder what her function at this "hospital" might be.... and
I am sure there are far more frequent emergency room calls for women who
have placed bizarre objects in themselves.... didja know that's why there
is a small indentation in the bottom of Coke bottles! So that when it
sucks up in, the doc can use a drill inserted into that indentation to
release the vacumn.
Matthew Alexander
<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>Indeed, Samantha. You will have to be subjected to endless 'education'
>until your attitude toward perversion changes. Perhaps they will not have
>to use any of the electrical devices.
How ironic... electrical torture is exactly what Trent Lott and other
"gay recovery" supporters advocate when they talk about Aversion
Therapy. That's where they attach wires to your genitals and shock you
while making you watch pornography. Other centers use chemicals to
induce nausa and vomiting. The technique was first developed in Nazi
Germany.
Rasmus Neikes
>
> Rasmus Neikes wrote:
>
> > Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
> > > news:3803C4DD...@csufresno.edu...
> > > > Samantha wrote:
> >
> > *G* We could just leave the poor kid alone and see what she's like after
> > she recovers...
> >
> > Ras "on second though..." mus.
> >
> > --
> > There was a point to this story, but it has temporarily escaped the
> > chronicler's mind. (D. Adams)
>
> I personally wonder what her function at this "hospital" might be....
I know of some hospitals that hire peolpe to reasd faiy tales to the
childrne there, etc... any bets? *G*
and
> I am sure there are far more frequent emergency room calls for women who
> have placed bizarre objects in themselves....
That would make sense, but be that as it may: For all I know it is
impossible to get a living animal into one's digestive system that way
and by the time one would arrive at the hospital it would definitely no
longer be alive, anyway.
didja know that's why there
> is a small indentation in the bottom of Coke bottles! So that when it
> sucks up in, the doc can use a drill inserted into that indentation to
> release the vacumn.
'xcuse me, gotta buy a bottle of coke - no, i didn't know that! *L*
Rasmus.
Not a Republican
> Not a Republican wrote:
> >
> > Uh-oh, Samantha. You've done it now. You've called a gross sexual
> > perversion a gross sexual perversion, instread of a 'valid alternative
> > lifestyle'. You have no alternative but to withstand the hissy fits of
the
> > entire Pink Army. I just hope they don't scratch your eyes out.
>
> Uh-oh people, look who's back. And is samantha another one of your
> stage-names, a drag-persona you bring out to make it look like there's
> someone else out there who is even more lacking in the clue department
> than you are? And I won't even go into the whole issue of people with a
> gross sexual obsession with other people's sex lives calling other
> people sex lives "gross sexual obsessions." Obviously you are really
> hoping to get someone to explain, in explicit detail what it is that we
> do in our own bedrooms, a truly bizarre phone-sex thing. Otherwise you
> wouldn't be here making such an utter fool of yourself. Really, don't
> think you're fooling anybody.
I don't care to know any details of a homosexual's pathetic, perverted sex
life. That's YOUR hallucination. It's also your little strawman to cover
your obsession with getting everyone else to approve your deviance.
And no, Samantha is just another person with some common sense, not a
drag-persona. That's just more projection-based hallucination on your part.
Increase your meds, or stop taking them, one.
--
nar
CJ Watson
Douglas H. Wildoner wrote:
> <snip> "The more gays are out, the more they become known and accepted as
> friends,
> family and co-workers. The more they are accepted, the more they can
> come out. This cycle of 'outness' is at the root of changed attitudes and
> policy."
>
> --Boston Globe columnist Ellen Goodman
The same could be accomplished with any human behavior/desire. They are human
behaviors/desires, after all. It's not difficult to throw humanity in front of all
of them. Some would be so perverted as to have to be euphemized and propagandized
ad naseum, though.
"The masses must not be repulsed by premature exposure to homosexual behavior
itself. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent, and only later his
unsightly derriere." (Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill, "The Overhauling of
Straight America," Guide, November 1987, pp. 14-24)
--W
Douglas H. Wildoner
Not a Republican wrote:
> Indeed, Samantha. You will have to be subjected to endless 'education'
> until your attitude toward perversion changes. Perhaps they will not have
> to use any of the electrical devices.
>
> Post-modernist tolerance: You can believe what you want, but must act as if
> they're right.
>
> Dennis Kemmerer <den...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:7tvonp$no1$2...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> > Samantha, honey, get some therapy for your obsession with others' sex
> lives.
>
> That's a tired dodge. It is in fact your insistence that others ratify your
> perversion that is the obsession.
>
> --
> nar
nerd... oops, must be a Freudian slip there. You believe as you will, nobody
can change your mind except you. And, that won't happen because you are afraid
to admit you might be wrong about anything. When a person can admit an error
and learns from that, his/her mind expands a bit. We are reaching others
though... and each one we reach realizes that homosexuality is not the horrid
thing described by narrow-minded bigots.
Douglas H. Wildoner
Samantha wrote: (snipped the drivel)
Defaming the American flag with rainbow colors? Does this mean you have
shit-fits when you see a fabric emblem of the flag sewn onto someone's jeans?
Especially on that butt that you find so replusive! How are you handling the
American flag with the Native or First American superimposed on it? What about
all the other places and ways it is displayed? And what about the other groups
who superimpose things on it... things like the "stars and bars"?
Maybe if you were to stop trying to silence people, they wouldn't feel a
need to scream. Maybe if you weren't so insistent on denying gays equal rights,
there wouldn't be rallies, or gay pride events. Are you really serious that
the sewer was developed as a place to put a penis? As to working in a hospital
to understand your anger.... it would probably aid me in determining a correct
course of action to help you get better. Are you an on an out-patient basis
with the psych ward? Instable? A homosexual may be unstable, but then so may
a het. Too bad you never bothered to look at any of the research (Hooker) used
when it was decided to remove homosexuality from a listing of
diseases/infirmities.
The only "laws" I am looking for are those that treat me as an equal, that
don't force me into a second class citizenship.
Damn.... I thought that HIV (the virus that leads to a condition referred to
as AIDS, of course you as the upstanding and excellent health care provider
already knew that; didn't you Sammi!) was passed from het to het in Africa. Of
course who am I to argue with a person who was so unjustly passed over at
promotion time. Sugar, sounds to me like sour grapes.
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are
powerful beyond measure.
It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us.
We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented and fabulous?
Actually, who are you not to be?
You are a child of God. Your playing small doesn't serve the world. There's
nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure
around you.
We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us.
It's not just in some of us; it's in everyone.
And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people
permission to do the same.
As we are liberated from our own fear: our presence automatically liberates
others."
--Nelson Mandela
Turin
> > In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha"
<sye...@calweb.com>
> wrote:
> >
chance.
> >
>
colors and
> if gay people would stop screaming persecution based on their
grotesque
> sexual interests.
Oh, so suppressing homosexuality is now a patriotic thing too. It's
just amazing how much old ground the bigots keep reclaiming while
pretending to support tolerance......
> These irritations have answered both of your refutes
with
> proof.
You consider flag loyalty and anti-protest as proof? Proof of what?
Who owns the country?
> When will gays act like civilized people. This IS the problem.
Oh and how many years ago was it that you burned your bra on a street
corner for *your* rights, honey? You didn't approve of that uncivilized
nonsense, Did you?
> I
> personally have been passed for promotion based on a political action
> initiated by a gay whom did not have the credentials (schooling) or
for that
> matter a knowlege of the buisness. I quit... and then he was fired a
few
> months later...
Hahahaha....that's women & Affirmative Action for you. When it works
for them by working against men then they have nothing to say against
the idea. The so-called "Patriarchy" justifies it for them. When the
same thing happens to them then they become instant equalitarians filled
with indignation over preferential treatment for others who have
suffered discrimination.
I doubt you had "the credentials" either. Just some phony degree
certifying that you passed a lot of lowered standards, and aren't to be
"discriminated" against when you can't do the job, because you are a
woman.
"Knowlege of the buisness" [sic]....*choke*. That's a classic
substitute for real qualifications, that many women who finagle their
ways through doors learn to invoke for everything they want, once they
make their way in. "I've got seniority now! I've got experience! Why
don't **I** get that!!!" Ninety-five percent - plus - of women's
qualifications are derived from on the job training where they really
only have a very narrow grasp of a few basic things before some
charitable AA complying company takes them under their wing and trains
them from scratch by picking the brains of the competent men who *had*
to learn their stuff with no special consideration - in addition to
having to compete against higher standards against other AA promoted
women who didn't. Secretaries are notorious for this. Higher career
women simply expect the field to redefine itself to accommodate them.
> Oh! Grotesque... Here goes... America flurished far better after the
sewers
> were designed to remove refuse from the living area's. This has been
the
> greatest invention to stop sickness and health hazzards. A place to
stick
> the penis.... This has resulted in masive health issues.
Gee, some research would say that abortion relates to breast cancer
because of the way that it starts and stops women's reproductive cycles
and halts the natural changes that take place in a woman's body without
anything else being done to return the rest of the body back to it's
pre-pregnancy state. Therefore that has resulted in massive health
issues too. But somehow I think you'll expect modern medicine to find
the cure for that for you too, instead of *women* controlling *their*
behavior.
> Penises do
not
> belong in the butt.
That's pretty dogmatic. Tampons don't belong in a vagina, either.
Neither do contraceptive sponges. IUDs don't belong in a uterus.
Neither do forceps, vacuum cleaners, saline solutions & lots of other
things that women love to use in their mindless combat against nature's
decree for their bodies. You're point...?
> You would have to work in a hospital to
understand my
> anger.
And your church too. Try not to get so involved in the personal lives
of your patients. What led up to it is none of your business. If you
find yourself getting angry over what you're seeing then chances are
probably that you can't claim that the nudity of a human body means
nothing to you as a medical professional, and probably aren't objective
about anything else either.
> Removeing living animals from the rectums among many other projectiles
have
> become a really sickening job.
So? Call in PETA to do it. They love saving animals. It's my
understanding that medical personnel are often called upon to slice
people open to remove foreign objects, and simply seeing that on TV
takes some getting used to. Is that then to say that this is what you
dig? Good for you. Go into that line of work and not the other.
It's women with agendas - like you - who wait in emergency rooms for
each female or kid that come's in with some unexplained bruise on their
body that they can use to try to brainwash them into believing they are
in an "abusive and controlling" relationship by correlating it to a man
in their lives who so much as raises his voice during an argument.
> The diseases that are found in the gay
> population rival those found hundereds of years ago. All because the
actions
> they generically preform are done unclean. Thus, transmittance levels
based
> on the orfices of choice are increased.
Then you must be saying that as long as they wash before and after, then
homosexuality is ok. So why condemn it completely? Because it doesn't
fit in with your brought up traditions - that's why.
> Not to mention the
psychological
> AVERAGES have provided proof that a extremely high level of gay's are
> instable.
Yes, not to mention that. When the psychological AVERAGES on women are
shown to reflect their own paranoid sexual instability on subjects that
are figments of their imaginations - like "date-rape" or the
"sexual-harassment" caused by mere sexually suggestive pictures or
stories - then the rationale is that "they" are just fine and responding
normally to adverse conditions and that it's SOCIETY that has to adjust
it's attitudes. Well? Which is it?
> This does support the higher averages of interveinious drug
use
> that has aided the AIDS and HEP.
Yeah, so did back-alley abortions with their nasty complications. Let's
blame it on women's lifestyles, Right?
> I do understand their are 'clean'
gays...
> ect.
Oh, that's good of you. I hear there's some clean women without yeast
infections too.
> But lets look at the majority. You are pushing the minority
versus the
> majority issues down the majorities throats. And you wonder why there
is
> name calling?
So it's only the #'s that means anything to you? Ethics are nothing
more than math? Well then, explain to me how men should react by the
disporportionate funding that breast cancer research gets over prostate
cancer? I think it's something like 20:1 while the actual statistics
are only 8:1. Men should call women names then too, Right? Or should
the ethics of the individual prevail, and to hell with majority opinion?
> So your position is:
>
> Gays deserve more laws than the rest of us because they cannot control
their
> urges to profess their sexuality. Thus identifies they require more
laws to
> survive.
Spare me. What about women who can't control their procreative urges
and so expect society to not only condone killing unborn human beings so
that their whimsical lives can be more convenient, but that they require
more laws to "survive", like buffer zones around abortion clinics that
prevent people from simply talking to them just in case something more
happens? "No self-control?" "Sexuality?" "More laws?"
What about sexual harassment laws? What about blaming men for
misinterpretting a woman's sexual cues when that's all she will give off
because she's *still* saying that she "likes" the romance of traditional
chivalry and unspoken nuance, and when a man does "gentlemanly" things
for her...?
> Or because people are aware of the incorrectness of things
> returning to the exit of the human body...
In this age of scientific reason where people are unaware of the
incorrectness of allowing women in positions of authority over men at
the same time that they acknowledge that women can't cope in the same
situations as they, because they don't believe in following every role
that nature cut us out for, Why would they see something sexual as an
issue of "correctness" or "incorrectness"?
> Or they need more support
because
> they have created infestations of AIDS, HEP, ect... due to their
bloody
> abuse of the EXIT of the human body....
Or women who would have botched their own abortions using coat-hangers
due to their bloody abuse of the LIFE CREATING function of the human
body....
> > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> preversion?
> >
> > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> >
> > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
> >
> > --
> > John
> >
> > NOTE: "From" address is deliberately wrong.
> > My correct e-mail address is:
> >
> > desalvio["AT" SYMBOL]monitor.net
>
>
--
————————————————————————
Turin • http://www.fortunecity.com/rivendell/lair/129/
————————————————————————
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
John De Salvio
> John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message
> news:desalvo-1210...@rp06.pm3.monitor.net...
> > In article <38030...@news.calweb.com>, "Samantha" <sye...@calweb.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > When gay's return to being called just people... They have a chance.
> >
> > Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
>
[Boring rant repeating some of the more worn-out fantasies about gay people]
Samantha,
Have you eve considered engaging your brain before posting?
Fortunately for us, people like you make us look exceptionally fine.
Keep up the unintended good work!
John De Salvio
<rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> Samantha wrote:
> >
> > Simpler version....
> > John De Salvio <des...@monitor.net> wrote in message news:desalvo->
> >
> > > Fine. Then tell all your bigoted pals to stop the name-calling.
> >
> > Name calling.... So sad.. Try acting civil and people would not have the
> > opportunity.
>
> Why don't you go ahead and simply LIST the behaviour of John that you
> perosnally dissaprove of. Go ahead, I could sure do with another laugh
> here...
>
> >
> > > > Why should they get better jobs based on their grotesque sexual
> > preversion?
> > >
> > > Just where the hell do you get this grotesque notion?
> > >
> > > Certainly not from anything resembling reality.
> >
> > Do you need physical education again?
>
> What does physical ed. have to do with your claim that homosexuals would
> be asking for any sort of jobs based on ther sexuality?
>
>
> The rectum's design was to remove
> > waist not to provide a penis a warm disease ridden hole.
Good heavens!
If taking a dump removed my waist, I'd have severe impaction by now!
Or is that Samantha's way of dieting?
Take a dump, lose some inches around the waist.
Judging from Samantha's posts, her waist must be HUGE!
Not a Republican
news:3803E15C...@epix.net...
>
>
> Not a Republican wrote:
>
> > Indeed, Samantha. You will have to be subjected to endless 'education'
> > until your attitude toward perversion changes. Perhaps they will not
have
> > to use any of the electrical devices.
> >
> > Post-modernist tolerance: You can believe what you want, but must act
as if
> > they're right.
> >
> > Dennis Kemmerer <den...@excite.com> wrote in message
> > news:7tvonp$no1$2...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> > > Samantha, honey, get some therapy for your obsession with others' sex
> > lives.
> >
> > That's a tired dodge. It is in fact your insistence that others ratify
your
> > perversion that is the obsession.
> >
> > --
> > nar
>
>
>
> nerd... oops, must be a Freudian slip there. You believe as you will,
nobody
> can change your mind except you. And, that won't happen because you are
afraid
> to admit you might be wrong about anything. When a person can admit an
error
> and learns from that, his/her mind expands a bit.
You should try reading your own material.
--
nar
tcc2
pics and the drugs and boyfriends of juniors..
Rasmus Neikes wrote:
> Douglas H. Wildoner wrote:
> >
> > Rasmus Neikes wrote:
> >
> > > Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Aw, Rob, you're wasting your time - she's a moron.
> > > >
> > > > Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
> > > > news:3803C4DD...@csufresno.edu...
> > > > > Samantha wrote:
> > >
Turin
"CWBarton" <buck...@gte.net> wrote:
>
> Turin wrote in message <7u0060$74e$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>
> >Democrats are...
> >probably far more responsible for the persecution of homosexuals...
(than
> Republicans)
>
> An interesting statement. Can you provide an example to illustrate
it?
Can you provide a statement to illustrate why you feel that it is
interesting?
--
————————————————————————
Turin •
http://www.fortunecity.com/rivendell/lair/129/
————————————————————————
Matthew Alexander
<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
>news:3803FF83...@csufresno.edu...
>> Not a Republican wrote:
>> >
>> > Uh-oh, Samantha. You've done it now. You've called a gross sexual
>> > perversion a gross sexual perversion, instread of a 'valid alternative
>> > lifestyle'. You have no alternative but to withstand the hissy fits of
>the
>> > entire Pink Army. I just hope they don't scratch your eyes out.
>>
>> Uh-oh people, look who's back. And is samantha another one of your
>> stage-names, a drag-persona you bring out to make it look like there's
>> someone else out there who is even more lacking in the clue department
>> than you are? And I won't even go into the whole issue of people with a
>> gross sexual obsession with other people's sex lives calling other
>> people sex lives "gross sexual obsessions." Obviously you are really
>> hoping to get someone to explain, in explicit detail what it is that we
>> do in our own bedrooms, a truly bizarre phone-sex thing. Otherwise you
>> wouldn't be here making such an utter fool of yourself. Really, don't
>> think you're fooling anybody.
>
>I don't care to know any details of a homosexual's pathetic, perverted sex
>life. That's YOUR hallucination. It's also your little strawman to cover
>your obsession with getting everyone else to approve your deviance.
Are you upset?
Mr None
::
::
::Jim FL wrote:
::
::> The title may sound inflammatory
::
::Correct.
::
::> but I believe it reflects George W. Bush’s
::> vision for gay and lesbian Americans.
::
::You need to check your history to see who recommended a "Final Solution" and
::what they avowed, first.
many have recommended a final solution and they have suggested many things
everything from killing all gays to rounding them up in camps.
::> His statements are clear enough and
::> can only end in
::> one result---the total elimination of all civil rights and freedoms for
::> every gay and lesbian
::> in this country.
::
::How are any civil rights being denied to anyone now?
the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
::> Thie latest and most horrific example of George W. Bush’s overt hostility to
::> gays and
::> constitutional rights <snip>To
::> declare that
::> for no other reason than a person’s sexual orientation,
::
::Strawman. He didn't say he was going to fire anyone based on sexual desires...
::which cultic leftists hold so sacred. How would he go about firing someone on
::the basis of their desires and "feelings"?
Stupidman. He said that he was going to not hire people based not on how well
they can do the job, but on something entirely non related to doing the job....which
cultic christians hold so sacred. He would fire them and put down as the "official"
reason _they didnt perform well_. Not that hard is it??
::> a citizen is
::> disqualified from
::> holding a federal position is blatant bigotry of the first order.
::
::This is blatant stupidity of the first order, and a liar's strawman to boot.
you are a blatant bigot of the first order.
::> Should we
::> wonder if Mr.
::> Bush believes that openly gay people should not hold any federal job? Does
::> he presume
::> that gay people are unfit to hold any job in this country?
::
::How do you presume that "gay people" are defined? How is anyone supposed to
::have beliefs about something idiot leftists won't even define?
you did not answer the question.
why should we define it for you? you know what it means.
how is anyone supposed to have beliefs about something idiot christians wont even
define?
::> What jobs are gay
::> people fit to
::> hold?
::
::What are "gay people"? Is that some element of your own collectivist psychotic
::impulse?
you didnt answer the question.
what are "chrsitians"? is that some element of your own collectivist psychotic
impulse?
::> Does it not follow that gay people should be cut out of the economy
::> altogether?
::
::Duh.
you are a bigot.
::How is it that people who make homosexuality a way of life are so much wealthier
::than average? What follows what?
how is it that people who make christianity a way of life are so much wealthier
than average? What follows what?
::> What then is to be their fate? Reduction to abject poverty?
::
::You're ignorant.
you are a bigot
::> Elimination from
::> society?
::
::Stupid too.
you are a bigot.
::> Liquidation?
::
::Did I mention idiotic?
did i mention hateful. heil CJ!!
::> These are legitimate questions that must be asked in response to Mr. Bush’s
::> statements.
Mr None
::Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
::news:3803FF83...@csufresno.edu...
::> Not a Republican wrote:
::> >
::> > Uh-oh, Samantha. You've done it now. You've called a gross sexual
::> > perversion a gross sexual perversion, instread of a 'valid alternative
::> > lifestyle'. You have no alternative but to withstand the hissy fits of
::the
::> > entire Pink Army. I just hope they don't scratch your eyes out.
::>
::> Uh-oh people, look who's back. And is samantha another one of your
::> stage-names, a drag-persona you bring out to make it look like there's
::> someone else out there who is even more lacking in the clue department
::> than you are? And I won't even go into the whole issue of people with a
::> gross sexual obsession with other people's sex lives calling other
::> people sex lives "gross sexual obsessions." Obviously you are really
::> hoping to get someone to explain, in explicit detail what it is that we
::> do in our own bedrooms, a truly bizarre phone-sex thing. Otherwise you
::> wouldn't be here making such an utter fool of yourself. Really, don't
::> think you're fooling anybody.
::
::I don't care to know any details of a homosexual's pathetic, perverted sex
do you realize how silly you sound? no? okay, you sound really really silly.
if you dont know any details of a homosexual's life then why would you
speak out against it??
::life. That's YOUR hallucination. It's also your little strawman to cover
and yours.
::your obsession with getting everyone else to approve your deviance.
It is your little stupidman to cover
your obsession with trying to get everyone to be just like you.
Not a Republican
news:249EE9A19CA6B546.1B0762B0...@lp.airnews.net...
> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 14:34:35 -0400, "Not a Republican"
<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>
> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
::news:F4294CD41D28091B.AF21D150...@lp.airnews.net...
> ::> On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:09:21 -0400, "Not a Republican"
whose
> ::lexicon has enough semantic 'richness' to successfully parse THAT!
>
> you admit you are wrong! great!
>
> you say you dont what to know the details of homosexuality.
>
> yet you speak out against it.
Uh---the two statements don't form even a complex equivalence, so your
attempt at retort falls apart. Sorry.
One need not know the details of global thermonuclear war or rape in order
to speak out against either.
So, your little attempt goes like this--Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt-click!
--
nar
--
nar
joker
this sounds more like what idiots like nitro do, when they can't find some
skanky crack 'ho pussy to stick their tiny little dix in -- go fuck their 10
year old daughters, sons, nieces, nephews, sisters, brothers, strangers'
children...
...since anyone with half a brain knows that 99% of all child abuse is
perpetrated by HETEROSEXUAL MEN!!!
Nitro wrote in message ...
>> you speak out against something of which you dont know the details of.
>>
>>
>
>whats to know.. a bunch of grown men trying to find other grown men to
shove
>there dicks in, when that fails go out and recruit a 10 year old.
>
>
Mr None
::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
::news:249EE9A19CA6B546.1B0762B0...@lp.airnews.net...
::
::Uh---the two statements don't form even a complex equivalence, so your
::attempt at retort falls apart. Sorry.
::
::One need not know the details of global thermonuclear war or rape in order
::to speak out against either.
yes you do. and this is why we do speak out against them.
hell if we didnt know the details of global thermonuclear war
we wouldnt speak out against it.
the fact that you equate consentual sex with rape and
global thermonuclear war shows that you speak without
thinking. and speak without knowing what you are speaking
about.
nar nar
::So, your little attempt goes like this--Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt-click!
Robert Serrano
>
> Robert Serrano <rj...@csufresno.edu> wrote in message
> news:3803FF83...@csufresno.edu...
> > Not a Republican wrote:
> > >
> > > Uh-oh, Samantha. You've done it now. You've called a gross sexual
> > > perversion a gross sexual perversion, instread of a 'valid alternative
> > > lifestyle'. You have no alternative but to withstand the hissy fits of
> the
> > > entire Pink Army. I just hope they don't scratch your eyes out.
> >
> > Uh-oh people, look who's back. And is samantha another one of your
> > stage-names, a drag-persona you bring out to make it look like there's
> > someone else out there who is even more lacking in the clue department
> > than you are? And I won't even go into the whole issue of people with a
> > gross sexual obsession with other people's sex lives calling other
> > people sex lives "gross sexual obsessions." Obviously you are really
> > hoping to get someone to explain, in explicit detail what it is that we
> > do in our own bedrooms, a truly bizarre phone-sex thing. Otherwise you
> > wouldn't be here making such an utter fool of yourself. Really, don't
> > think you're fooling anybody.
>
> I don't care to know any details of a homosexual's pathetic, perverted sex
Obviously you do, or you wouldn't keep broadcasting your little
fantasies out into the world.
> That's YOUR hallucination. It's also your little strawman to cover
> your obsession with getting everyone else to approve your deviance.
Have I indicated giving a fig what you do or do not approve of? You've
got a mighty high opinion of yourself, which is probably another effect
of all this "self-esteem" claptrap they're pushing in the schools these
days.
You are posting in a gay newsgroup. You keep on posting in a GAY
newsgroup. You, and those like you, have demonstrated that, despite
what you would like us to believe, you are obsessed with our sex lives.
> And no, Samantha is just another person with some common sense, not a
> drag-persona. That's just more projection-based hallucination on your part.
Misusing psycho-babble will get you nowhere. Unlike many posters like
yourself, I do not run around under a variety of aliases to make it seem
that there are more people who share my views than there really are.
> Increase your meds, or stop taking them, one.
Since I'm not on any medication, it would be rather difficult for me to
either increase or stop taking them. Since I've no need for medication,
being, unlike yourself of sound mind and body, there's really no reason
for me to start taking them. I suggest you take inventory of your own
medicine chest before trying to diagnose others.
Rob
Not a Republican
> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 18:51:46 -0400, "Not a Republican"
<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>
> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
::news:249EE9A19CA6B546.1B0762B0...@lp.airnews.net...
> ::> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 14:34:35 -0400, "Not a Republican"
> ::<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
> ::>
> ::> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> ::>
>
::::news:F4294CD41D28091B.AF21D150...@lp.airnews.net..
.
> ::> ::> On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:09:21 -0400, "Not a Republican"
Well, then, it must mean that I don't want to know about it. Thanks for the
validation. Duh!!
--
nar
Mr None
::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
::news:C6BFD89263512A9E.A779B510...@lp.airnews.net...
how do you know that you dont like carrots if you never ate a carrot?
Mr None
Nitro
How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your head if
noones ever done it to you?
Speedbyrd®
wrote:
How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you never
had one??
The Speedbyrd® :>
Nitro
Speedbyrd® <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:380fe317...@news.slip.net...
Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a gay
day needledick.
Speedbyrd®
wrote:
>> >How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your head
>if
>> >noones ever done it to you?
>> >
>>
>> How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you never
>> had one??
>>
>> The Speedbyrd® :>
>
>Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
>thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
>down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a gay
>day needledick.
I'm so sure you refuse! Your mouth waters when you walk down the
street, and it isn't from watching women's asses! If it was, you
wouldn't be on here so much trying to bullshit me into thinking you
hate gays!! And I don't have to be afraid walking down the street and
not at all paranoid like you are. Now, do you want to rub pee-pees
with me or what?
The Speedbyrd® :>
Mr N[{0>]ne
::
::SpeedbyrdŽ <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
::> The SpeedbyrdŽ :>
::
::Common sense,
there is no such thing as "common" sense.
this is why you do what you do.
::thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
::down the street,
i dont watch my back any more than any one else does.
::day needledick.
night peabrain
Mr N[{0>]ne
::
::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
::news:D60F1FF5B207E0F2.D73A72A0...@lp.airnews.net...
::> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:29:23 -0400, "Not a Republican"
::> ::> ::
::> ::> ::One need not know the details of global thermonuclear war or rape in
::> ::order
::> ::> ::to speak out against either.
::> ::>
::> ::> yes you do. and this is why we do speak out against them.
::> ::>
::> ::> hell if we didnt know the details of global thermonuclear war
::> ::> we wouldnt speak out against it.
::> ::>
::> ::> the fact that you equate consentual sex with rape and
::> ::> global thermonuclear war shows that you speak without
::> ::> thinking. and speak without knowing what you are speaking
::> ::> about.
::> ::
::> ::Well, then, it must mean that I don't want to know about it. Thanks for
::the
::> ::validation. Duh!!
::>
::> how do you know that you dont like carrots if you never ate a carrot?
::>
::> Mr None
::
::How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your head if
::noones ever done it to you?
::
this is proof that there is no such thing as "common" sense.
if you had an intelligent response i would say more.
Mr N[{0>]ne
Nitro
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:54:28 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
> wrote:
>
head
> >if
> >> >noones ever done it to you?
> >> >
> >>
> >> How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you never
> >> had one??
> >>
> >> The Speedbyrd® :>
> >
> >Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
> >thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
> >down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a
gay
> >day needledick.
>
> street, and it isn't from watching women's asses! If it was, you
> wouldn't be on here so much trying to bullshit me into thinking you
> hate gays!! And I don't have to be afraid walking down the street and
> not at all paranoid like you are. Now, do you want to rub pee-pees
> with me or what?
>
> The Speedbyrd® :>
That response demonstrates how futile your life is, you have nothing solid
to reply with so you type out this bullshit. Once again i have to point out,
youve failed. As have your parents.
Nitro
The name is Benjo <fama...@casema.net> wrote in message
news:380ce985$0$19...@reader1.casema.net...
>
> Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> news:kJ5P3.11146$y45.2...@news4.giganews.com...
That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
Nitro
Mr N[{0>]ne <mr_...@goldensection.com> wrote in message
news:2816E5481C493D2D.D630E3E4...@lp.airnews.net...
<Yawn> liar.
Mr N[{0>]ne
::
::SpeedbyrdŽ <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
::news:380ce99d...@news.slip.net...
::> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:54:28 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
::> wrote:
::>
::> >> >How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your
::head
::> >if
::> >> >noones ever done it to you?
::> >> >
::> >>
::> >> How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you never
::> >> had one??
::> >>
::> >> The SpeedbyrdŽ :>
::> >
::> >Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
::> >thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
::> >down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a
::gay
::> >day needledick.
::>
::> I'm so sure you refuse! Your mouth waters when you walk down the
::> street, and it isn't from watching women's asses! If it was, you
::> wouldn't be on here so much trying to bullshit me into thinking you
::> hate gays!! And I don't have to be afraid walking down the street and
::> not at all paranoid like you are. Now, do you want to rub pee-pees
::> with me or what?
::>
::> The SpeedbyrdŽ :>
::
::That response demonstrates how futile your life is, you have nothing solid
::to reply with so you type out this bullshit. Once again i have to point out,
::youve failed. As have your parents.
THe yellow pill is a lamp which lights the who
room with tv glow.
Rocket sled never heard...make him stop.
lick the smoking dee pog.
Mr N[{0>]ne
::
::The name is Benjo <fama...@casema.net> wrote in message
god damn it. what the yellow dog doesnt know.
come on.
god damn it? you cant bring the couch out on to
the porch.
Supperman "qzgoo" 7073
Mr N[{0>]ne
::
::Mr N[{0>]ne <mr_...@goldensection.com> wrote in message
::news:2816E5481C493D2D.D630E3E4...@lp.airnews.net...
::> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:54:28 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote:
::>
::> ::
::> ::Speedbyrd® <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
::> ::> The Speedbyrd® :>
::> ::
::> ::Common sense,
::>
::> there is no such thing as "common" sense.
::>
::> this is why you do what you do.
::>
::>
::> ::thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
::> ::down the street,
::>
::> i dont watch my back any more than any one else does.
shut the fuck up you jack asS!
::> ::day needledick.
::>
::> night peabrain
YOkdont know mee you pink chimmney.
why do you want to bring me down narc.
::
::<Yawn> liar.
<burp> durty undies.
i am going to settle the purple car.
Mr King Every Number, seven
(((Mr King Generally)))
::On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 14:34:35 -0400, "Not a Republican" <nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
::
::::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
::::news:F4294CD41D28091B.AF21D150...@lp.airnews.net...
::::> On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:09:21 -0400, "Not a Republican"
no he did not admit he was wrong.
go fuck yourself you jack asss.
::you say you dont what to know the details of homosexuality.
everybody knows what homosexuals do.
::yet you speak out against it.
come on people....under the yellow b rink rod.
::you speak out against something of which you dont know the details of.
you bigots are all the same.
read up and drink the coffe!
what a fucked up jack ass.
Nitro
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:41 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote:
>
> ::
> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> ::> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:29:23 -0400, "Not a Republican"
> ::> ::> ::One need not know the details of global thermonuclear war or
rape in
> ::> ::order
> ::> ::> ::to speak out against either.
> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> yes you do. and this is why we do speak out against them.
> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> hell if we didnt know the details of global thermonuclear war
> ::> ::> we wouldnt speak out against it.
> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> the fact that you equate consentual sex with rape and
> ::> ::> global thermonuclear war shows that you speak without
> ::> ::> thinking. and speak without knowing what you are speaking
> ::> ::> about.
> ::> ::
> ::> ::Well, then, it must mean that I don't want to know about it. Thanks
for
> ::the
> ::> ::validation. Duh!!
> ::>
> ::> how do you know that you dont like carrots if you never ate a carrot?
> ::>
> ::> Mr None
> ::
> ::How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your head
if
> ::noones ever done it to you?
> ::
>
>
> if you had an intelligent response i would say more.
>
> Mr N[{0>]ne
>
If I was not dealing with a queer who has solidified the concept of his own
obtuseness by engaging in homosexual sex, feasting on feces, molesting
pre-pubescent boys, attacking your rectum with any object that can be
obtained, and other symmetrically unenlightened rituals then it would be
conceivable that I would rejoinder in a much more poignant fashion.
Nonetheless I'm articulating with you, therefore I need not demonstrate any
scholarly retort's... so, go fuck yourself, your nothing more then a queer
and your opinion on any subject is absolutely meaningless in this country!
Just go find an ass to spread your "gift" to. dont wear a rubber!
Nitro
Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> Nitro wrote:
>
> > > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck
cock,
> > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you
walk
> > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have
a
> > gay
> > > > day needledick.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> >
> > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
>
>
> Rasmus.
They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small chance
that they'll kill ya if you fuck them. Plus it's NATURAL for a man to enjoy
womens asses retard.
Nitro
Did that make sense when you typed it?
L. Michael Roberts
Nitro wrote:
>
> The name is Benjo <fama...@casema.net> wrote in message
> news:380ce985$0$19...@reader1.casema.net...
> >
> > Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> > news:kJ5P3.11146$y45.2...@news4.giganews.com...
> > >
> > > Speedbyrd® <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:380fe317...@news.slip.net...
> > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:41 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
<snip>
> > > >
> > > > How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you never
> > > > had one??
> > > >
> > > > The Speedbyrd® :>
> > >
> > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
> > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
> > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a
> gay
> > > day needledick.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Ah, so you fuck asses.
>
> That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
"Approximately 25% of adults have had heterosexual anal
intercourse." A Review of Sexual Behavior in the United States By SN
Seidman, RO Rieder - American Journal of Psychiatry 151: 3 (MAR
1994) Page(s) 330-341
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Burlington, Ont, Canada To reply, remove 'SpamSux' from my E-ddress
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+==================================================================+
Robert Serrano
>
> Douglas H. Wildoner <popper...@epix.net> wrote in message
> news:3803E15C...@epix.net...
> >
> >
> > Not a Republican wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed, Samantha. You will have to be subjected to endless 'education'
> > > until your attitude toward perversion changes. Perhaps they will not
> have
> > > to use any of the electrical devices.
> > >
> > > Post-modernist tolerance: You can believe what you want, but must act
> as if
> > > they're right.
> > >
> > > Dennis Kemmerer <den...@excite.com> wrote in message
> > > news:7tvonp$no1$2...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> > > > Samantha, honey, get some therapy for your obsession with others' sex
> > > lives.
> > >
> > > That's a tired dodge. It is in fact your insistence that others ratify
> your
> > > perversion that is the obsession.
> > >
> > > --
> > > nar
> >
> >
> >
> > nerd... oops, must be a Freudian slip there. You believe as you will,
> nobody
> > can change your mind except you. And, that won't happen because you are
> afraid
> > to admit you might be wrong about anything. When a person can admit an
> error
> > and learns from that, his/her mind expands a bit.
>
> You should try reading your own material.
Suggestion: take your own advice.
Rob
ez99NO...@webtv.net.invalid
Robert old girl, if Adam was a chorus-boy. there would be no human race!
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Nitro
(((Mr King Generally))) <mr-king-...@goldensection.com> wrote in
message
news:E87F39DBD3F93C03.6CC1E247...@lp.airnews.net...
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:12:23 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote:
>
> If you had something intelligent to say I might reply with something
> other than a purple glass of rou8nding arms.
>
> And.....the man is a leather. With 6 round mouth.
>
> ::
> ::Mr N[{0>]ne <mr_...@goldensection.com> wrote in message
>
::news:E10DC08C418D94F6.4E9AF8D1...@lp.airnews.net...
> ::> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:41 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
wrote:
> ::>
> ::> ::
> ::> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> ::>
>
::::news:D60F1FF5B207E0F2.D73A72A0...@lp.airnews.net..
.
> ::> ::> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:29:23 -0400, "Not a Republican"
> ::> ::> ::> ::
> ::> ::> ::> ::One need not know the details of global thermonuclear war or
> ::rape in
> ::> ::> ::order
> ::> ::> ::> ::to speak out against either.
> ::> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> ::> yes you do. and this is why we do speak out against them.
> ::> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> ::> hell if we didnt know the details of global thermonuclear war
> ::> ::> ::> we wouldnt speak out against it.
> ::> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> ::> the fact that you equate consentual sex with rape and
> ::> ::> ::> global thermonuclear war shows that you speak without
> ::> ::> ::> thinking. and speak without knowing what you are speaking
> ::> ::> ::> about.
> ::> ::> ::
> ::> ::> ::Well, then, it must mean that I don't want to know about it.
Thanks
> ::for
> ::> ::the
> ::> ::> ::validation. Duh!!
> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> how do you know that you dont like carrots if you never ate a
carrot?
> ::> ::>
> ::> ::> Mr None
> ::> ::
> ::> ::How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your
head
> ::if
> ::> ::noones ever done it to you?
> ::> ::
> ::>
> ::> this is proof that there is no such thing as "common" sense.
> ::
> ::
>
Robert Serrano
>
> Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> news:kJ5P3.11146$y45.2...@news4.giganews.com...
> >
Haven't you heard of strap-ons?
Rob
Robert Serrano
>
> Nitro wrote:
>
> > > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
> > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
> > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a
> > gay
> > > > day needledick.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> >
> > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
>
If he was interested in their baskets, he'd demoralize himself even
more.
Rob
Robert Serrano
>
> >
> > Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> > news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > > Nitro wrote:
> > >
> > cock,
> > > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as
> you
> > walk
> > > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses.
> Have
> > a
> > > > gay
> > > > > > day needledick.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > > >
> > > > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small
> chance
> > that they'll kill ya if you fuck them. Plus it's NATURAL for a man to
> enjoy
> > womens asses retard.
>
> shitlover!
No, he's a shithead. There's a difference.
Rob
Robert Serrano
>
> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 19:14:35 GMT, mis...@none.at.nowhere.com (Mr None) wrote:
>
> ::
> ::::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> ::::> On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:09:21 -0400, "Not a Republican"
And yet, he is wrong, whether he admits it or not.
> go fuck yourself you jack asss.
There you go, fantasizing again.
> ::you say you dont what to know the details of homosexuality.
>
> everybody knows what homosexuals do.
I know what people like you would like to imagine that we do. And I
know what it is that I actually do. The two are only ever tangentially
related.
> ::yet you speak out against it.
>
> come on people....under the yellow b rink rod.
So, you support people speaking from ignorance, especially when they
sound essentially like you.
> ::you speak out against something of which you dont know the details of.
>
> you bigots are all the same.
Stop speaking to your mirror.
> read up and drink the coffe!
> what a fucked up jack ass.
That would be you, again.
Rob
Robert Serrano
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 23:48:42 GMT, mr_...@goldensection.com (Mr N[{0>]ne) wrote:
>
> We all know you are an idiot! So go fuck off!!
Funny, I could say the exact same thing of you. At least if I said it,
it would be true.
> ]]
> How stupid are you? WHy don't you
> just go away!!
WAH!!! They don't like me. WAH!!! I'm going to cry and cry and cry
until you go away. Proper characterization of your post? I do believe
that it is.
Rob
> ::::> ::day needledick.
The name is Benjo
Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
Ah, so you fuck asses.
Rasmus Neikes
> > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
> > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
> > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a
> gay
> > > day needledick.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Ah, so you fuck asses.
>
> That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
What then is your interest in "womens asses" ?
Rasmus.
--
There was a point to this story, but it has temporarily escaped the
chronicler's mind. (D. Adams)
The name is Benjo
Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:54:28 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> head
> > >if
> > >> >noones ever done it to you?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you never
> > >> had one??
> > >>
> > >> The Speedbyrd® :>
> > >
> > >Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
> > >thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you
walk
> > >down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a
> gay
> > >day needledick.
> >
> > street, and it isn't from watching women's asses! If it was, you
> > wouldn't be on here so much trying to bullshit me into thinking you
> > hate gays!! And I don't have to be afraid walking down the street and
> > not at all paranoid like you are. Now, do you want to rub pee-pees
> > with me or what?
> >
>
> That response demonstrates how futile your life is, you have nothing solid
> to reply with so you type out this bullshit. Once again i have to point
out,
> youve failed. As have your parents.
>
I'm not sure that Speedbyrd failed, or his parents. In my view they all
did/do a fine job. But now I have to talk about you again, yes boy, you
failed. Not once but over and over again.
Why?
You couldn't prevent these Ng's taking over by us, fags, that's one.
You refuses to answer simple and serious questions, because
you don;t have the answers, that's two.
And third, I'm sorry to expose you as the coward you are, you
failed more than three times to answer my challenge.
I will remember you ONE more time: you called me by several
occasions a child molester, I then asked you for your real name
and address so I could send you a letter in which you state so, only
to sign (I do you that favor, I know that writing a letter is a bit
difficult for you).
Then I will send that signed letter to my lawyer and I will have my
day in court. You HAVE to prove I'm a child molester and I know
you can't, so I will ask for compensation and by god, you have to
work the rest of your miserable life to pay me.
I even promised you not to make your name and address
public in the ng's, and to make it even easier, I HAVE posted
my full name and p.o.box number in this ng, just in case
you don't want to send email.
Till now: no email, nothing in my p.o.box.
In my very humble (giggle) opinion this make you a coward
and you really have to shut up now and make no more commends
about someone else.
Just follow the example given by your good buddy Glen (aka Glenda,
aka GiGi) who just left OUR ng's.
Rasmus Neikes
>
> everybody knows what homosexuals do.
****
The Homosexual Agenda
I know that many of you have heard Pat Robertson, Jerry Fallwell and
others speak of the "Homosexual Agenda," but no one has ever seen a copy
of it.
Well, I have finally obtained a copy directly from the Head Homosexual.
It follows below:
6:00 am Gym
8:00 am Breakfast (oatmeal and egg whites)
9:00 am Hair appointment
10:00 am Shopping
12:00 PM Brunch
2:00 PM
1) Assume complete control of the U.S. Federal, State and
Local Governments as well as
all other national governments,
2) Recruit all straight youngsters to our debauched lifestyle,
3) Destroy all healthy heterosexual marriages,
4) Replace all school counselors in grades K-12 with agents of
Colombian and Jamaican
drug cartels,
5) Establish planetary chain of "homo breeding gulags" where
over-medicated imprisoned
straight women are turned into artificially impregnated
baby factories to produce
prepubescent love slaves for our devotedly pederastic gay
leadership,
6) bulldoze all houses of worship, and
7) Secure total control of the INTERNET and all mass media for
the exclusive use of
child pornographers.
2:30 PM Get forty winks of beauty rest to prevent facial wrinkles from
stress of world conquest
4:00 PM Cocktails
6:00 PM Light Dinner (soup, salad, with Chardonnay)
8:00 PM Theater
11:00 PM Bed (du jour)?
****
http://www.deja.com/[ST_artlink=www.netfunny.com]/jump/http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/99/Sep/agenda.html
or <Se71...@netfunny.com>
> you bigots are all the same.
I thought so, too until read your posts. I've NEVER seen a bigot admit
that they were all the same...
>
> read up and drink the coffe!
> what a fucked up jack ass.
Rasmus.
(((Mr King Generally)))
We all know you are an idiot! So go fuck off!!
]]
How stupid are you? WHy don't you
just go away!!
::::> ::day needledick.
Rasmus Neikes
>
> Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > Nitro wrote:
> >
> cock,
> > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you
> walk
> > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have
> a
> > > gay
> > > > > day needledick.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > >
> > > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
> >
> >
> > Rasmus.
>
> that they'll kill ya if you fuck them.
I rest my case.
Plus it's NATURAL for a man to enjoy
> womens asses retard.
Rasmus.
(((Mr King Generally)))
If you had something intelligent to say I might reply with something
other than a purple glass of rou8nding arms.
And.....the man is a leather. With 6 round mouth.
::
::Mr N[{0>]ne <mr_...@goldensection.com> wrote in message
::news:E10DC08C418D94F6.4E9AF8D1...@lp.airnews.net...
::> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:41 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote:
::>
::> ::
::> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
::>
::::news:D60F1FF5B207E0F2.D73A72A0...@lp.airnews.net...
::> ::> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:29:23 -0400, "Not a Republican"
::> ::> ::> ::
::> ::> ::> ::One need not know the details of global thermonuclear war or
::rape in
::> ::> ::order
::> ::> ::> ::to speak out against either.
::> ::> ::>
::> ::> ::> yes you do. and this is why we do speak out against them.
::> ::> ::>
::> ::> ::> hell if we didnt know the details of global thermonuclear war
::> ::> ::> we wouldnt speak out against it.
::> ::> ::>
::> ::> ::> the fact that you equate consentual sex with rape and
::> ::> ::> global thermonuclear war shows that you speak without
::> ::> ::> thinking. and speak without knowing what you are speaking
::> ::> ::> about.
::> ::> ::
::> ::> ::Well, then, it must mean that I don't want to know about it. Thanks
::for
::> ::the
::> ::> ::validation. Duh!!
::> ::>
::> ::> how do you know that you dont like carrots if you never ate a carrot?
::> ::>
::> ::> Mr None
::> ::
::> ::How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your head
::if
::> ::noones ever done it to you?
::> ::
::>
The name is Benjo
Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
>
> Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > Nitro wrote:
> >
> cock,
> > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as
you
> walk
> > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses.
Have
> a
> > > gay
> > > > > day needledick.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > >
> > > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
> >
> >
> > Rasmus.
>
> They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small
chance
enjoy
> womens asses retard.
You mean fuck a woman's ass? My god, he fucks asses, he's a
shitlover!
>
>
Nitro
> Nitro wrote:
> >
> > Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> > news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > > Nitro wrote:
> > >
suck
> > cock,
> > > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as
you
> > walk
> > > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses.
Have
> > a
> > > > gay
> > > > > > day needledick.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > > >
> > >
> > > What then is your interest in "womens asses" ?
> > >
> > > Rasmus.
> >
> > They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small
chance
> > that they'll kill ya if you fuck them.
>
>
>
> Plus it's NATURAL for a man to enjoy
No, it's a mental problem, probably terrified of women cause something your
mother did to you, or repetitive fucking by a male family member to train
your friggin 80 IQ brain that it's acceptable.. The "natural" theory gets
blown to shit when then occasional ex-homo comes in here and tells you
fuckers how sick you and your lifestyle is and how much happier they are
with women now. Thank you for playing.
Nitro
>
> Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> >
> > Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> > news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > > Nitro wrote:
> > >
suck
> > cock,
> > > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as
> you
> > walk
> > > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses.
> Have
> > a
> > > > gay
> > > > > > day needledick.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > > >
> > >
> > > What then is your interest in "womens asses" ?
> > >
> > > Rasmus.
> >
> > They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small
> chance
> enjoy
> > womens asses retard.
>
> You mean fuck a woman's ass? My god, he fucks asses, he's a
> shitlover!
Yet another thing flew right over your head.. did you even see it pass. Im
convinced most homo's are also peds and well on the way of being convinced
that most are some of the stupidest people ever to find the power button on
a computer.. did someone turn that fucking thing on for you or did you
figure it out all by yourself.
Nitro
L. Michael Roberts <News...@SpamSux.LaserFX.com> wrote in message
news:380D1570...@SpamSux.LaserFX.com...> > news:380ce985$0$19...@reader1.casema.net...
> > >
> > > Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> > > news:kJ5P3.11146$y45.2...@news4.giganews.com...
> > > >
> > > > news:380fe317...@news.slip.net...
> > > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:41 -0400, "Nitro"
<Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
>
>
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you
never
> > > > > had one??
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck
cock,
> > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you
walk
> > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have
a
> > gay
> > > > day needledick.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> >
>
> intercourse
fascinating, Approx 98% of pegpumpers have had unprotected anal sex. What
the fucks your point? It's natural for a man to be attracted to all of a
woman, it's a mental problem when a man wants to stuff a cock in another
mans hairy fucking ass, go seek some professional help.. faggots have been
cured before.
The name is Benjo
attempt.
Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
news:n7bP3.11775$y45.2...@news4.giganews.com...
>
> Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> news:380D0E39...@bigfoot.com...
> > Nitro wrote:
> > >
> > > Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> > > news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > > > Nitro wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you
> suck
> > > cock,
> > > > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back
as
> you
> > > walk
> > > > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens
asses.
> Have
> > > a
> > > > > gay
> > > > > > > day needledick.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > > > >
> > > > > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
> > > >
> > > > What then is your interest in "womens asses" ?
> > > >
> > > > Rasmus.
> > >
> > > They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small
> chance
> > > that they'll kill ya if you fuck them.
> >
> > I rest my case.
> >
> >
> > Plus it's NATURAL for a man to enjoy
>
The name is Benjo
as long as there's no proof... you're an idiot.
Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
news:phbP3.10479$5W2.2...@news6.giganews.com...
>
> The name is Benjo <fama...@casema.net> wrote in message
> news:380d11f5$0$19...@reader1.casema.net...
> >
> > Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> > news:yY7P3.10122$5W2.2...@news6.giganews.com...
> > >
> > > Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> > > news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > > > Nitro wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you
> suck
> > > cock,
> > > > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back
as
> > you
> > > walk
> > > > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens
asses.
> > Have
> > > a
> > > > > gay
> > > > > > > day needledick.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > > > >
> > > > > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
> > > >
> > > > What then is your interest in "womens asses" ?
> > > >
> > > > Rasmus.
> > >
> > > They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small
> > chance
> > > that they'll kill ya if you fuck them. Plus it's NATURAL for a man to
> > enjoy
The name is Benjo
Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
news:RjbP3.10485$5W2.2...@news6.giganews.com...
>
> L. Michael Roberts <News...@SpamSux.LaserFX.com> wrote in message
> news:380D1570...@SpamSux.LaserFX.com...
> >
> > Nitro wrote:
> > >
> > > The name is Benjo <fama...@casema.net> wrote in message
> > > news:380ce985$0$19...@reader1.casema.net...
> > > >
> > > > Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:kJ5P3.11146$y45.2...@news4.giganews.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > Speedbyrd® <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:380fe317...@news.slip.net...
> > > > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:41 -0400, "Nitro"
> <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you
> never
> > > > > > had one??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Speedbyrd® :>
> > > > >
> > > > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck
> cock,
> > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as
you
> walk
> > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses.
Have
> a
> > > gay
> > > > > day needledick.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > >
> > > That would serve no purpose other then to demoralize myself.
> >
Rasmus Neikes
>
> .
> Robert old girl, if Adam was a chorus-boy. there would be no human race!
And if your book of myths were to be belived we'd all stem from a bunch
of incest-relationships.
The name is Benjo
Nitro <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com> wrote in message
>
> Mr N[{0>]ne <mr_...@goldensection.com> wrote in message
> news:E10DC08C418D94F6.4E9AF8D1...@lp.airnews.net...
wrote:
> >
The only one here is you who's nothing.
Rasmus Neikes
>
> Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:D60F1FF5B207E0F2.D73A72A0...@lp.airnews.net...
> > On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:29:23 -0400, "Not a Republican"
> <nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
> >
> > ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > ::> yes you do. and this is why we do speak out against them.
> > ::>
> > ::> hell if we didnt know the details of global thermonuclear war
> > ::> we wouldnt speak out against it.
> > ::>
> > ::> the fact that you equate consentual sex with rape and
> > ::> global thermonuclear war shows that you speak without
> > ::> thinking. and speak without knowing what you are speaking
> > ::> about.
> > ::
> > ::Well, then, it must mean that I don't want to know about it. Thanks for
> the
> > ::validation. Duh!!
> >
> > how do you know that you dont like carrots if you never ate a carrot?
> >
> > Mr None
>
> How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your head if
> noones ever done it to you?
It is unlikley that he was never hit at all during his life; it is quite
possible if not likley that he was at times being hit on the head and
suffered from pain. I would also assume that the hits he received during
his life were of different strenght with accordingly different levels of
pain connected to it. There should beplenty evidence in his life that
basebal bats made from wood or metal would be used to carry out a rather
strong hit. The conclusion follows.
L. Michael Roberts
> > Nitro wrote:
> > >
> > > Rasmus Neikes <rasmus...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> > > news:380D0024...@bigfoot.com...
> > > > Nitro wrote:
> > > >
> suck
> > > cock,
> > > > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as
> you
> > > walk
> > > > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses.
> Have
> > > a
> > > > > gay
> > > > > > > day needledick.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rasmus.
> > >
> > > They look good, theres no hair on them, and there's a very very small
> chance
> > > that they'll kill ya if you fuck them.
> >
> >
> >
> > Plus it's NATURAL for a man to enjoy
>
> mother did to you, or repetitive fucking by a male family member to train
> your friggin 80 IQ brain that it's acceptable.. The "natural" theory gets
> blown to shit when then occasional ex-homo comes in here and tells you
> fuckers how sick you and your lifestyle is and how much happier they are
> with women now. Thank you for playing.
Speaking from experience?
BTW there exists not one single case [zero, nada zip] of a person
changing their sexual orientation in the peer reviewed scientific
journals. If you have a cite for such a case, by all means post it!
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Burlington, Ont, Canada To reply, remove 'SpamSux' from my E-ddress
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+==================================================================+
L. Michael Roberts
Nitro wrote:
>
> L. Michael Roberts <News...@SpamSux.LaserFX.com> wrote in message
> news:380D1570...@SpamSux.LaserFX.com...
> >
> > Nitro wrote:
> > >
> > > The name is Benjo <fama...@casema.net> wrote in message
> > > news:380ce985$0$19...@reader1.casema.net...
> > > >
> > > > news:kJ5P3.11146$y45.2...@news4.giganews.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > Speedbyrd® <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:380fe317...@news.slip.net...
> > > > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:41 -0400, "Nitro"
> <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> >
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you
> never
> > > > > > had one??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Speedbyrd® :>
> > > > >
> > > > > Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck
> cock,
> > > > > thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you
> walk
> > > > > down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have
> a
> > > gay
> > > > > day needledick.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah, so you fuck asses.
> > >
> >
> > intercourse
Nice unmarked snipping of the source for the cite - NOT!
>
> fascinating, Approx 98% of pegpumpers have had unprotected anal sex.
Naturally you have a cite from a peer reviewed journal or study to
back up your otherwise vacuous assertion?
> What
> the fucks your point?
That the majority of people who engage in anal sex are
HETEROsexual.
> It's natural for a man to be attracted to all of a
> woman, it's a mental problem when a man wants to stuff a cock in another
> mans hairy fucking ass,
Your obsessive fantasies about other peoples' sex lives are
remarkably detailed....
> go seek some professional help.. faggots have been
> cured before.
Your incorrect assumption about the sexual orientation of those who
have answered your post is noted!
Gomez Addams
ha!
go sniff some skanky 'ho pussy, nit-wit...
Nitro wrote in message ...
>
>Speedbyrd® <Spee...@nomail.com> wrote in message
>news:380ce99d...@news.slip.net...
>> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:54:28 -0400, "Nitro" <Ni...@SPAMvalinet.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> >How would you know you wouldnt care for a baseball bat upside your
>head
>> >if
>> >> >noones ever done it to you?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> How do you know you wouldn't like my 'bat' up your ass if you never
>> >> had one??
>> >>
>> >> The Speedbyrd® :>
>> >
>> >Common sense, thats the difference between us, thats why you suck cock,
>> >thats why I refuse to. Thats why you have to watch your back as you walk
>> >down the street, thats why all i have to watch is womens asses. Have a
>gay
>> >day needledick.
>>
Gomez Addams
go fuck your mother, nit-wit nitro.
Nitro wrote in message ...
>
>Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:D60F1FF5B207E0F2.D73A72A0...@lp.airnews.net...
>> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:29:23 -0400, "Not a Republican"
><nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>>
>> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>
>::news:C6BFD89263512A9E.A779B510...@lp.airnews.net...
>> ::> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 18:51:46 -0400, "Not a Republican"
>> ::<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>> ::>
>> ::> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> ::>
>>
>::::news:249EE9A19CA6B546.1B0762B0...@lp.airnews.net.
.
>.
>> ::> ::> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 14:34:35 -0400, "Not a Republican"
>> ::> ::<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>> ::> ::>
>> ::> ::> ::Mr None <mis...@none.at.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> ::> ::>
>> ::>
>>
>::::::news:F4294CD41D28091B.AF21D150...@lp.airnews.ne
t
>..
>> ::.
>> ::> ::> ::> On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:09:21 -0400, "Not a Republican"
>> ::> ::> ::<nos...@forgetit.com> wrote:
>> ::> ::> ::>
>> ::> ::One need not know the details of global thermonuclear war or rape
in
>> ::order
>> ::> ::to speak out against either.
>> ::>
>> ::> yes you do. and this is why we do speak out against them.
>> ::>
>> ::> hell if we didnt know the details of global thermonuclear war
>> ::> we wouldnt speak out against it.
>> ::>
>> ::> the fact that you equate consentual sex with rape and
>> ::> global thermonuclear war shows that you speak without
>> ::> thinking. and speak without knowing what you are speaking
>> ::> about.
>> ::
>> ::Well, then, it must mean that I don't want to know about it. Thanks
for
>the
>> ::validation. Duh!!
>>
>> how do you know that you dont like carrots if you never ate a carrot?
>>
>> Mr None
>