Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Did SGI out-Mongoose Microsoft (with RE4?)?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Harry Tanovich

unread,
Aug 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/1/99
to
When Fahrenheit was announced everyone was waiting for Microsoft to
break off or sabotage the alliance after SGI had invested alot into it
(someone said Microsoft would "twist the knife").

But was Fahrenheit just a ruse by SGI? Just a bait-and-switch?

Isn't it true that by year's end, SGI's crown jewel scenegraph API,
Performer, will be running on Pentium 3 quad processor Linux boxes?

And isn't it true that by year's end SGI will be releaseing RE4? Will
RE4 run on the 540 Visual Workstations?

Maybe SGI is perfectly willing to let Microsoft have Fahrenheit...

EVILjosh

unread,
Aug 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/1/99
to

> When Fahrenheit was announced everyone was waiting for Microsoft to
> break off or sabotage the alliance after SGI had invested alot into it
> (someone said Microsoft would "twist the knife").
>
> But was Fahrenheit just a ruse by SGI? Just a bait-and-switch?
>
> Isn't it true that by year's end, SGI's crown jewel scenegraph API,
> Performer, will be running on Pentium 3 quad processor Linux boxes?

And not Windoze?

> And isn't it true that by year's end SGI will be releaseing RE4? Will
> RE4 run on the 540 Visual Workstations?
>
> Maybe SGI is perfectly willing to let Microsoft have Fahrenheit...

You mean red herring style?

Yours,

Josh...
_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/

Emmanuel Florac

unread,
Aug 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/2/99
to
Harry Tanovich a écrit :

>
> When Fahrenheit was announced everyone was waiting for Microsoft to
> break off or sabotage the alliance after SGI had invested alot into it
> (someone said Microsoft would "twist the knife").
>
> But was Fahrenheit just a ruse by SGI? Just a bait-and-switch?
>
> Isn't it true that by year's end, SGI's crown jewel scenegraph API,
> Performer, will be running on Pentium 3 quad processor Linux boxes?

Performer is available for windows PCs for several years... There's a
company selling it (though I don't remember the name).



> And isn't it true that by year's end SGI will be releaseing RE4? Will
> RE4 run on the 540 Visual Workstations?

Certainly not, 540 is already available and nobody never heard about
something like RE hardware in 540. Probably for Onyx2 then.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Atelier Sud Video
Integration Engineer | 39-41 Bd du général Martial Valin
mailto:efl...@asv-europe.com | 75015 PARIS
http://www.asv-europe.com | phone: 33 153982333 fax: 33 153982368
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harry Tanovich

unread,
Aug 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/2/99
to
EVILjosh wrote:

>
> And not Windoze?
>
>

No.


Mark Lasersohn

unread,
Aug 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/2/99
to

--

Can anyone confirm this (Performer for Windoze)?

Mark Lasersohn
Aztech Design
la...@aztechdesign.com
http://www.aztechdesign.com
Don't let the cows fool you!
330-569-7492

Harry Tanovich

unread,
Aug 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/2/99
to
There's no such thing. He's confusing Inventor with Performer. Or maybe with
GVS. Performer likes realtime OS extensions and things like frame rate schedulers
which SGI can add into Linux but which won't be in NT.

Harry Tanovich

unread,
Aug 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/2/99
to
Harry Tanovich wrote:

> When Fahrenheit was announced everyone was waiting for Microsoft to
> break off or sabotage the alliance after SGI had invested alot into it
> (someone said Microsoft would "twist the knife").
>
> But was Fahrenheit just a ruse by SGI? Just a bait-and-switch?
>
> Isn't it true that by year's end, SGI's crown jewel scenegraph API,
> Performer, will be running on Pentium 3 quad processor Linux boxes?
>

> And isn't it true that by year's end SGI will be releaseing RE4? Will
> RE4 run on the 540 Visual Workstations?
>

> Maybe SGI is perfectly willing to let Microsoft have Fahrenheit...

Alastair wrote:

> This article is quite interesting since it seems to be well sourced. I
> know it's
> 'all' rumour and speculation ...
>
> http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,84-40027,00.html?tt.yfin..txt.ni
>
> --
>
> Alastair
> work : alas...@psoft.co.uk
> home : alas...@calliope.demon.co.uk

Oh. I guess not.


Mike Krus

unread,
Aug 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/3/99
to
Mark Lasersohn wrote:
> > Performer is available for windows PCs for several years... There's a
> > company selling it (though I don't remember the name).
> Can anyone confirm this (Performer for Windoze)?
VEGA comes with a port of Performer, at least a library with an interface
compatible with Performer. But it is not complete and is not distributed
as a separate product...

Mike Krus

--
___ ___ __ __
( \/ ) ( |/ ) //// mwkrus @ yahoo.com
| \__/ | | < (o o) http://www.multimania.com/mkrus
(__) (__) (__|\__) ------oOO--(_)--OOo---- ICQ: 30900412
Half the planet's population has never placed a phone call...

Emmanuel Florac

unread,
Aug 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/3/99
to
Mike Krus a écrit :

>
> Mark Lasersohn wrote:
> > > Performer is available for windows PCs for several years... There's a
> > > company selling it (though I don't remember the name).
> > Can anyone confirm this (Performer for Windoze)?
> VEGA comes with a port of Performer, at least a library with an interface
> compatible with Performer. But it is not complete and is not distributed
> as a separate product...
>

I found a long time ago the website of a company selling a performer
toolkit for windows. I can't remember the name, but it was 'IRIS
performer'.

0 new messages