He was a courageous fighter in Vietnam, as well as a civil rights
activist for same-sex lovers...and also fasted for 40 days on behalf
of neglected Nam Vets.
My "Somalian Affair" includes dedications and articles to Randolph
Taylor, as well as my addressing our Marines in Somalia.
---
My web page kicks butt (but never licks it)!
http://www.fog.net/ekrahlin/
ejkr...@juno.com
>>He was a courageous fighter in Vietnam, as well as a civil rights
>>activist for same-sex lovers...and also fasted for 40 days on behalf
>>of neglected Nam Vets.
>Your Homo-Hero, Randolph Louis Taylor, was an administrative clerk who
>never picked up a weapon in "Nam! Additionally, his San Francisco
>"Fast" was a "Farce". I've already provided proof on both accounts...why
>do you persist in your efforts to revive a common lie?
I'd be most interested in seeing your proof...or directing me to
access of said proof. Anything anyone has to say on this man--whether
pro or con--I would be glad to hear, regardless of whether or not I
like what I hear. I do have my own proof, including an article from
Stars and Stripes, and various other media articles...all of which are
for all to view on my web site. I also flew to Wash. D.C. to stand by
his side in hopes of recovery from his self-inflicted bullet
wound...also documented on my web site.
However, if his fast and maybe some other things, was a sham, I would
like proof of this. Randolph is, among other things, a brilliant
trickster...and I am just as willing to expose the dirt about him, as
I am to expose the good things. I am for truth before anything else.
However, regardless of this man's failings...I find him, overall, to
be a man worth respecting and listening to.
But please, I have never heard of you before, so let me know how I can
access the information you claim to have.
>>My "Somalian Affair" includes dedications and articles to Randolph
>>Taylor, as well as my addressing our Marines in Somalia.
>Then it's not a true homosexual page...is it?
Oh, har, har. No, it's not a *passive* homosexual page...it's
*aggressive*. Besides, a lot of straight men don't care to lick
pussy...yet they're still hetero.
You may answer me privately, or via newsgroups...as I posted this
reply both privately and in Usenet.
---
My web site kicks (but never licks) butt!
http://www.geocities.com/~ezekiel_k/
ejkr...@juno.com
>>He was a courageous fighter in Vietnam, as well as a civil rights
>>activist for same-sex lovers...and also fasted for 40 days on behalf
>>of neglected Nam Vets.
>Your Homo-Hero,
*Homo* hero? Well, then, this makes all straight heroes *breeder*
heroes.
>Randolph Louis Taylor, was an administrative clerk who
>never picked up a weapon in "Nam! Additionally, his San Francisco
>"Fast" was a "Farce". I've already provided proof on both accounts...why
>do you persist in your efforts to revive a common lie?
I'd be most interested in seeing your proof...or directing me to
access of said proof. Anything anyone has to say on this man--whether
pro or con--I would be glad to hear, regardless of whether or not I
like what I hear. I do have my own proof, including an article from
Stars and Stripes about his service in Vietnam, and various other
media articles (Washington Post, Senator Cranston, Warren Hinckle,
etc.)...all of which are availabe for anyone to view on my web site.
I also flew to Wash. D.C. to stand by his side in hopes of recovery
from his self-inflicted bullet wound...also documented on my web site.
However, if his fast and maybe some other things, was a sham, I would
like proof of this. Randolph is, among other things, a brilliant
trickster...and I am just as willing to expose the dirt about him, as
I am to expose the good things. I am for truth before anything else.
However, regardless of this man's failings...I find him, overall, to
be a man worth respecting and listening to.
But please, I have never heard of you before, so let me know how I can
access the information you claim to have.
>>My "Somalian Affair" includes dedications and articles to Randolph
>>Taylor, as well as my addressing our Marines in Somalia.
>Then it's not a true homosexual page...is it?
Oh, har, har. No, it's not a *passive* homosexual page...it's
*aggressive*. Besides, a lot of straight men don't care to lick
pussy...yet they're still hetero.
Besides which...you certainly have a perverted perception about what
gay people are all about.