Missouri will lose final 5 games
Chris Nelli
5-6. Tell me, what game are they going to win? Nebraska? A&M? KState?
TT? Colorado? 5 straight losses, bet on it. They suck, did you see how
they played OU? You may be 5-1 now but you haven't played anybody.
Chris
Rick
Chris Nelli wrote:
No way! Mizzou will destroy NU. Bank on it baby!!!
Kenny20920
>5-6. Tell me, what game are they going to win? Nebraska? A&M? KState?
>TT? Colorado? 5 straight losses, bet on it. They suck, did you see how
>they played OU? You may be 5-1 now but you haven't played anybody.
Thats interesting! I was wondering who they play to finish the year. I saw
Folwer on ESPN talking about if Missouri went in the take it would hurt OSU and
KSU strength of schedule rankings, in turn making it harder for them to beat
out UT and UCLA.
"Drinking and driving don't mix. That's why I ride a bike." DuckMan
Pretty In Pink
dreamcast
wrote:
>Missouri will not win a game for the rest of the year. They will finish
>5-6. Tell me, what game are they going to win? Nebraska?
>Chris
um... game in progress seems to answer your question....
MIZZ 13-3 so far... The MIZZ def is playing quite splendidly!
later
J
*******************************************
Visit the Top 50 Sega Dreamcast Sites!
at:
http://www.sega-dreamcast.org/top50/rankem.html
-----------------------------------------------
Visit Extreme's Dreamcast Links Site
at:
http://www.sega-dreamcast.org
Home to system specs, publisher list, EXTENSIVE links
section, downloads, news releases and other related info!
Currently 148 Dreamcast links on my list
*******************************************
Martin Martens
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 1998 17:55:35 -0500, ne...@texas.net (Chris Nelli)
> wrote:
>
> >Missouri will not win a game for the rest of the year. They will finish
> >5-6. Tell me, what game are they going to win? Nebraska?
>
> >Chris
>
> um... game in progress seems to answer your question....
>
> MIZZ 13-3 so far... The MIZZ def is playing quite splendidly!
While Missouri can win this game, I wouldn't describe their defense as
playing splendidly. Missouri has two TDs off one UNL fumble (not caused
by the defense) and a blocked FG. The Huskers have out-rushed (104 yds
to 53 yds) and out-passed (65-38) Missouri.
The Huskers are moving the ball but just not putting it in. Yet. *IF*
UNL can cut out the mistakes, they should be able to come back and win.
UNL's defense has been stopping the Missouri offense and playing better
but it is difficult to overcome the problems the offense has created.
If they keep giving the Tigers the breaks, Missouri can run away with
it. I expect the Tigers to get at least one TD on a long play in the 2nd
half. UNL needs 3 TDs to win at this point.
As for Missouri's later games, they should beat Colorado.
J Spilinek
Not to mention the blinded referee's on BOTH first and goal plays.
False start penalty missed
Fumble missed.
NU's ball on the 1 yard line.
Real Score: 6-6 at the half.
Martin Martens
>
> On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 11:10:09 -0700, Martin Martens
> <martin....@usa.net> wrote:
> >If they keep giving the Tigers the breaks, Missouri can run away with
> >it. I expect the Tigers to get at least one TD on a long play in the 2nd
> >half. UNL needs 3 TDs to win at this point.
>
> Not to mention the blinded referee's on BOTH first and goal plays.
>
> False start penalty missed
>
> Fumble missed.
>
> NU's ball on the 1 yard line.
>
> Real Score: 6-6 at the half.
Don't we wish. Real score is 13-6 MU.
It is UNL that is giving the Tigers the breaks, not the refs.
Martin Martens
> > <martin....@usa.net> wrote:
> [...]
> > >If they keep giving the Tigers the breaks, Missouri can run away with
> > >it. I expect the Tigers to get at least one TD on a long play in the 2nd
> > >half. UNL needs 3 TDs to win at this point.
That's one. 13-13.
Corby still isn't full speed. UNL is getting a break there.
But why is Newcombe sitting out?
Martin Martens
>
> > > On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 11:10:09 -0700, Martin Martens
> > > <martin....@usa.net> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >If they keep giving the Tigers the breaks, Missouri can run away with
> > > >it. I expect the Tigers to get at least one TD on a long play in the 2nd
> > > >half. UNL needs 3 TDs to win at this point.
>
> That's one. 13-13.
That's two. UNL 20 - UM 13.
Thanks for the weauxfing Nikk.
Martin Martens
Whew. They only needed two but then Missouri didn't get a long play.
> Thanks for the weauxfing Nikk.
Really!
Nikk Pilato
> That's two. UNL 20 - UM 13.
> Thanks for the weauxfing Nikk.
Weauxfing? As if I actually give a *shit* about either team. All I need
to know is this: FSU > aTm > UNL. It don't matter how it ends up at the
end. Nice try, Paul. Same cluelessness, however.
+++++++++++
Nikk Pilato
Center for Music Research
Florida State University
Chris Nelli
KState>Colorado>TT>A&M>Nebraska>Missouri------->All determined by games
UT?----->less than Kstate but haven't played the rest
Baylor, OU, OSU, ISU, KU------->they all suck big time so who cares, they
have not won against the teams above them, only among themselves
So there, mathematical proof that Missouri will lose the rest of their
games. This also predicts that Kstate and Colarado will beat Nebraska.
Kstate doesn't play TT or A&M this year. What is also interesting is
where UT fits in this. They obviously belong below Kstate but how far?
They still are waiting on their big games (nebraska, TT, A&M) to decide
their ranking.
Anyway, Missouri will lose their next four games, bank on it.
Chris
Matthew Hennig
>to know is this: FSU > aTm > UNL. It don't matter how it ends up at the
But also, A&M > Baylor > NC State > FSU...
HTH
To email me remove the NO_JUNK. string from my from address.
Be warned, the string of NOSPAM has been shown to be filterable
by spamming software. By reading this message you are hereby
notified not to add me to any emailing list.
I was Net.Scum, but NetScum is no more. (R.I.P. 10/16/97)
Support CAUCE - http://www.cauce.org
Eric J
>
> Corby still isn't full speed. UNL is getting a break there.
>
> But why is Newcombe sitting out?
Nebraska needs a break, too. ;-)
JEC8686
Folwer on ESPN talking about if Missouri went in the take it would hurt OSU and
KSU strength of schedule rankings, in turn making it harder for them to beat
out UT and UCLA. <<<
It would definitely hurt OSU but should be a wash for KSU since the teams that
will be beating Mizzou are also teams that KSU will have beaten, assuming they
win out.
JEC8686
MIZZ 13-3 so far... The MIZZ def is playing quite splendidly!
later<<<
This is why it is dangerous to weauxf while a game is in progress.
Steve Casburn
Hennig) wrote:
>
> Nikk Pilato:
>
> > FSU > aTm > UNL.
>
> But also, A&M > Baylor > NC State > FSU...
[ F$U > aTm ] >>>> [ aTm > Baylor > NCSU > F$U ]
Steve
...QED...
--
Steve Casburn <cas...@gslis.utexas.edu>
"Shut up he explained"
-- Ring Lardner, Jr.
Martin Martens
>
> Martin Martens <martin....@usa.net> wrote:
> > That's two. UNL 20 - UM 13.
>
> > Thanks for the weauxfing Nikk.
>
> Weauxfing?
Sorry, my mistake Mr. Piliatovsky. You were gloating (apparently in
ignorance and obviously too early). Unless that wasn't you who posted a
comment about the UNL-UM halftime score.
> As if I actually give a *shit* about either team. All I need
> to know is this: FSU > aTm > UNL.
Uhuh.
Let's see, that's about as meaningful as:
Baylor > NC State > FSU or
Virginia > NC State > FSU or
Georgia Tech > NC State > FSU
But hey, the way the Georgia Tech game is going, it may be accurate
there.
FSU is lucky to have 7 pts.
At least UNL's only loss so far is to a ranked team.
> It don't matter how it ends up at the end.
Sure Nikkolyvich, we'll see.
> Nice try, Paul. Same cluelessness, however.
Whatever. The cluelessness still appears to be yours.
But I'm dissapointed. Your post was missing your usual references to
body fluids or insults about my mother.
[Meletseeya, ehtaht chehlav'yek preestayot ka mn'yeh!]
da sveedahnya, prekhadetyeh snova
Martin Martens
> > But hey, the way the Georgia Tech game is going, it may be accurate
> > there.
> > FSU is lucky to have 7 pts.
>
> your ass. I vote for option B.
I knew you'd get in some body parts into it eventually. Must be
something to do with your homophobia. I posted that during half-time and
at the time FSU was lucky to have those 7 pts. FSU cleaned up in the 2nd
half and it was apparent after their first 2nd half drive that GT wasn't
going to do much more.
Ciao
[...]
Nikk Pilato
> In article <70tc43$dj6$3...@news.fsu.edu>, Nikk Pilato <pila...@cmr.fsu.edu> wrote:
> But also, A&M > Baylor > NC State > FSU...
Indeed, therefore: Baylor > NC State > Nebraska. Sheesh! Who'da ever
thunk UNL could be inferior to a "pansy" ACC team (2 of 'em, actually!)
Nikk Pilato
> Sorry, my mistake Mr. Piliatovsky. You were gloating (apparently in
> ignorance and obviously too early). Unless that wasn't you who posted a
> comment about the UNL-UM halftime score.
It was. Again, let me explain: I don't give two figs about
either team, so it don't matter who wins or loses. I asked a simple
question, that being: "Did the Husker's weauxfing catch up with them
again?" Obviously, the answer is no, at least not this week. That still
does not equal gloating or weauxfing, just a simple observation. Try
again.
> But hey, the way the Georgia Tech game is going, it may be accurate
> there.
> FSU is lucky to have 7 pts.
You must be watching a different game. Or you have your head up
your ass. I vote for option B.
> At least UNL's only loss so far is to a ranked team.
Irrelevant. A loss is still a loss is still a loss. NC State
played a great game, and I still give them all the credit in the world
for being a better team than us on that day. I do not think they are
the better team any longer.
> Whatever. The cluelessness still appears to be yours.
Irrelevant. I could argue your newbie-like cluelessness all day.
If you must act ignorant, by all means go ahead. Just stop flaunting your
ignerence on this'ere public chatrum...
> But I'm dissapointed. Your post was missing your usual references to
> body fluids or insults about my mother.
> [Meletseeya, ehtaht chehlav'yek preestayot ka mn'yeh!]
[Dum-ayou, shto niet.]
> da sveedahnya, prekhadetyeh snova
If you're trying to transliterate the Cyrillic alphabet, the most common
and accepted form for goodbye is Do Svidania.
[Ya du-mah t{iey} niesteh angliski-rooskie slovar, mo-szheet?]
Jeff Rogers
Casburn) wrote:
>In article <70tluk$t73$1...@news.tamu.edu>, ma...@aggies.No_Junk.org (Matthew
>Hennig) wrote:
>>
>> Nikk Pilato:
>>
>> > FSU > aTm > UNL.
>>
>> But also, A&M > Baylor > NC State > FSU...
>
>
> [ F$U > aTm ] >>>> [ aTm > Baylor > NCSU > F$U ]
Navy > Boston College > Georgia Tech.
(Hey to my brother. Somebody had to say it.)
--
Jeffrey W. Rogers
http://jwrogers.home.mindspring.com/ <- my web page is back!
Always remember to pillage BEFORE you burn.
Doug Sorensen
ne...@texas.net says...
> Missouri will not win a game for the rest of the year. They will finish
> TT? Colorado? 5 straight losses, bet on it. They suck, did you see how
> they played OU? You may be 5-1 now but you haven't played anybody.
>
Mizzou will bitch-slap TT and CU.
Doug
Chris Nelli
Okay, so the rankings need arranging and it didn't turn out so simple, sue me:
KState>Colorado>TT
A&M>Nebraska>Missouri and A&M>TT
Kansas>Colorado
Chris
Matthew Hennig
>Okay, so the rankings need arranging and it didn't turn out so simple, sue me:
>
>KState>Colorado>TT
>A&M>Nebraska>Missouri and A&M>TT
>Kansas>Colorado
You forgot A&M > Kansas.
HTH
MH
Steven Christopher Huntsman
> On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 19:17:03 -0500, cas...@gslis.utexas.edu (Steve
> Casburn) wrote:
>
> >In article <70tluk$t73$1...@news.tamu.edu>, ma...@aggies.No_Junk.org (Matthew
> >Hennig) wrote:
> >>
> >> Nikk Pilato:
> >>
> >> > FSU > aTm > UNL.
> >>
> >> But also, A&M > Baylor > NC State > FSU...
> >
> >
> > [ F$U > aTm ] >>>> [ aTm > Baylor > NCSU > F$U ]
>
> Navy > Boston College > Georgia Tech.
>
> (Hey to my brother. Somebody had to say it.)
Charlie Weatherbie did a dumn thing trying that FG. I nearly crapped
myself twice.
Steve Huntsman
math.nyu.edu/phd_students/huntsman/vandy.html
"God must hate the Sun Devils." -Greg Sumner