CATHOLICS AND THEIR LOVE FOR HATRED
Nicholas II
Almost 17 years I have been sharing Bible truths with Catholics and I
have come to the same conclusion EVERYONE else has come to that seeks
to share Gospel as well as prophetic facts with them. The Catholic
people are the most hate filled people on Earth. Especially if you use
a Bible to show your love for them. The very same demons that
generated the intense hatred of true Christianity during the
Inquisitions of the Vatican, are still running rampant in the Catholic
people today. It is here we must concentrate our Scriptural assualt as
well as our prayer.
The real sad thing is, most of these Catholics look at their hatred as
EVENGELIZATION.
Don't believe me?
Surf the posts folks. Notice how whenever a person shares Bible facts
and historic evidence exposing the Antichrist they get EXTREMELY vile,
insulting, hate filled, and combative. Even if they "think" the person
they are "evangelizing" has taken Scriptures out of context, and even
if they think the soul sharing with them is ill informed, instead of
sharing their version fo the Truth with them, they choose rather to
share exactly the very same spirit the Popes of old have shared.
Hatred!
I post this post for the sake of those elect that are still trapped in
this church. I ask you to look around and see that your church members
are 100% of the time more concerned with spewing hell inspired
insults, death threats, vulgaity, and name calling, instead of soft
gentle Scriptures that cut much deeper to the heart. Your eyes will
truly be opened to the real version of "Jesus" that the Catholic
church preaches. The Jesus of Rome is a tyrant, murderer, molestor,
hatemongerer, truth basher, drunkard, liar, scoffer, backbiter, and
scorn generator. In other words, the Christ of Rome is ANTI to the
Christ of Scripture.
Just look at the ample evidence YOUR CHURCH MEMBERS have given you.
Their method of evangelizing me and many like me have done more in the
way of proving my message as Truth than ANY tract, sermon, video, or
tape recorded message by me or any other Truth Preacher can share.
Reality alone has proven the Catholic church the home of ANTICHRIST!
I thank ALL of you Catholics that have treated me as Satan has desired
you treat me. You have proven my point with overwhelming accuracy. I
thank you for making my message so profoundly factual! And I forgive
you.
Blunt fact folks... Matthew 7:16, "Ye shall know them by their fruits.
Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?" The Roman
Catholic people can not possibly be considered Christians. It's that
easy tro see.
Presents of God ministry
--------------------------
Devastatingly accurate prophecies authenticated with
historic facts confirming Antichrist resides in Vatican!
Over 1800 pages of documented facts.
Site locations:
USA - www.remnantofgod.org
USA - www.localline2.com/~nicholas
AUST - www.linearg.com/remnantofgod/
The "major" prophetic facts... Summarized
http://www.remnantofgod.org/666-CHAR.htm
NEW!>!>! ANTICHRIST SLIDESHOW locations
http://www.remnantofgod.org/flash/acssmenu.html
http://www.localline2.com/~nicholas/flash/acssmenu.html
http://www.linearg.com/remnantofgod/flash/acssmenu.html
"Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and shew my
people their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins."
-Isaiah 58:1
Truth is truth.
...Nicholas
Ted McMillan
You HAVE to make a difference between honest Catholics and those who
are sent to do the treason. The Vatican produces two kinds of people:
honest Catholics and Dark Ages Catholics. Many honest Catholics do
not even know that there exists Dark Ages Catholics who are enabled to
far do and surpass anything any criminals in all the prisons can do.
These Catholics, at command, can easily poison an entire population of
people and then go to bed at night. The Dark Ages Catholics know
everything about the honest ones. The honest ones do not know much
about the Dark Ages product.
The honest Catholics serve as a cover. They are the flowers that line
all the outside of the Vatican. There were times when Protestants,
after acquiring freedom from Rome and then developing power through
the sudden increase of knowledge that came upon her exit from Rome,
were actually thinking about obliterating her entirely to even make up
for what was done to them. Very quickly they understood that they
couldn't do that: that church is lined with honest and good people.
Even Abraham Lincoln had cautioned against revealing much of what he
had even found out about the plots of Rome against the United States.
He knew a terrible religious war would ensue.
The Vatican is different however. If the Vatican is targeting an
enemy, except for reprisals, she would think nothing of blowing away
anything and everything that may be around that target. Communism
demonstrated this quite clearly. Nazism demonstrated it. You must
remember that with every war and revolution Rome caused, there were
even priests and nuns that opposed it. Many of these were quickly
wasted without a problem.
At times I find it difficult to make a verbal separation. I therefore
call Catholics Catholics, and I call the Jesuits and people here well
into the treason "Dark Ages Catholics." These are the ones who are
despots and who are intolerant, but cover it over and charge their
enemies with all their training. It is these same ones who attack me
constantly and cannot see that Foxe's Book of Martyrs is confirmed
with all that is going on with the postings on these newsgroups and
all over the internet. I times I wanted to classify them as not
Catholics, but Vaticans (Va-ti-Kawns). These are the ones literally
trained in deceit, treason, assassination and murder.
It is important that you make a difference. As you speak to honest
Catholics, be advised and be aware that among them you are addressing
some of the greatest champions the world will ever see for the truth
in just the near future. You cannot afford to offend these.
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
nich...@localline2.com (Nicholas II) wrote in message news:<37490177.0202...@posting.google.com>...
Lamarr Edwards
your experience is quite a feat.
I have seen SDA's get pretty upset when they are told that EGW was a con
woman, plagarist, and mentally disturbed. Seeing your method of "love",
I can easily understand how they could get angry with you.
Personally, I have lived with Catholics, gone to school with them, and
worked with them. My son in law is a Catholic.
I have never had a Catholic initiate a discussion with me along the
lines of " let me tell you why our church is superior to you
Protestants". I am sure most Catholics have heard this approach from
Protestants, especially SDA's
As far as your use of the word "hate", you simply are a fool. Some of
the kindest, most charitable people I have ever known have been
Catholics, and I have seen them make huge sacrifices for non -
Catholics.
I too seriously disagree with their beliefs.
Nevertheless, hyperbolic acidic attacks upon these good people and
calling them names, like "haters", will NEVER encourage them to look at
other beliefs, you only confirm for them that Protestants are arrogant
asses.
Don't ever forget that in the judgement Christ will not judge our
denomination, he will judge our faith in him. I am quite confident that
many many Catholics are true Christians, and many Protestants are not.
You sir despoil Protestants, and more importantly Christians, with your
narcicisstic ravings.
If I had the responsibility of judging you, and praise God I don't, I
would say you were neither.LE
Paul Tooley
"Lamarr Edwards" <shmo...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:13161-3C6...@storefull-298.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Ted McMillan
> Nicholas - How you can indict the largest Christian church based upon
> your experience is quite a feat.
How you can indict Ted McMillan based upon your own experience is even
more feet, and very stink ones.
> I have seen SDA's get pretty upset when they are told that EGW was a con
> woman, plagarist, and mentally disturbed. Seeing your method of "love",
> I can easily understand how they could get angry with you.
Those statements are absolutely false, and that is the problem. The
Adventist Church is not guilty of blood. No mention of dead bodies
can be connected to her, but Lamarr cannot notice that. His every
agenda is papal even though he claims he is Protestant. He told us
that our even documenting history as the Protestants have always done
is merely a game at who killed more than who. No Protestant has ever
said words like that to the condemnation of the Reformation, and it
still hasn't happened.
> Personally, I have lived with Catholics, gone to school with them, and
> worked with them. My son in law is a Catholic.
Lamarr is Catholic: Dark Ages Catholic. He also cannot notice that
terroristic words were said on these newsgroups by Ted Seeber, who
gloated that millions of Christians were put to death by his Rome.
> I have never had a Catholic initiate a discussion with me along the
> lines of " let me tell you why our church is superior to you
> Protestants". I am sure most Catholics have heard this approach from
> Protestants, especially SDA's
Then Lamarr has missed some stuff on the newsgroups. I have seen it
often. I was told it is the church started by Peter and we must
believe that Rome is the true church based upon who has successively
appointed to lead it.
> As far as your use of the word "hate", you simply are a fool. Some of
> the kindest, most charitable people I have ever known have been
> Catholics, and I have seen them make huge sacrifices for non -
> Catholics.
Lamarr has a problem with name-calling to add with profanity. Why
does he preach to us that we must not have a problem with that? Why
does he call Nicholas a fool just because Nicholas disagrees with him?
> I too seriously disagree with their beliefs.
Yeah, Yeah, Yeahhhh!!! Babbling false words!
> Nevertheless, hyperbolic acidic attacks upon these good people and
> calling them names, like "haters", will NEVER encourage them to look at
> other beliefs, you only confirm for them that Protestants are arrogant
> asses.
You heard what Lamarr is telling you "fool" Nicholas??
> Don't ever forget that in the judgement Christ will not judge our
> denomination, he will judge our faith in him. I am quite confident that
> many many Catholics are true Christians, and many Protestants are not.
What happens when a denomination is guilty of putting many people to
death? Shedding blood? Vaticans are here to tell us we are all the
same. They will yet condemn the Adventist Church. Why? She reproved
another church by saying the bible calls it the Antichrist. That is
horrible to them. What about the dead bodies? They will ignore those
dead bodies. When Christ comes, will He ignore those dead bodies?
NO!! Christ will attack that denomination as He marked them in the
prophecies. Will Christ ignored Ted Seeber as everyone else here who
defacated on me calling me hateful and mean while training me not to
name-call? NO! Christ will destroy all the children of the
Antichrist. He will destroy both root and branch: the body also of
the Beast will be committed to the flames.
> You sir despoil Protestants, and more importantly Christians, with your
> narcicisstic ravings.
What did Ted Seeber do again? You all need to ask more of the
servants of the Antichrist this question. Lamarr sees a problem here
with words, but cannot comment on more: the destruction of the lives
of Christians in the most horrible ways. They were name-called first
before they were put to death.
> If I had the responsibility of judging you, and praise God I don't, I
> would say you were neither.LE
Vatican Lamarr has done that and more. The only difference between
him and those who have committed the worst atrocities is that he
doesn't have power or authority to commit it.
Doug
others have written. . It's going to take me some time, because many of the
references to supposed Catholic documents found in many anti-catholic writings
are very obscure, and I'm having a bit of trouble finding them. I have found
that many of them are not what they are purported to be. In the interest of
truth and accuracy, I'm not going to post anything unless I can be sure of what
I'm writing, but it's coming.
Look for my response in a couple of months. I've only got an hour or so a day
to do research, and the volume of claims is quite large. I'm homeschooling my
kids and teaching religious education, and so that has to come first.
As far as hatred goes, if anyone hates you, they are not following the
teachings of the Catholic Church. Jesus taught us to love our enemies, and
pray for those who persecute us. Given the persecution that Catholics have
faced in the United States and other countries, many Catholics are quite
sensitive to the lies that have been put out there. So don't be surprised if
people get upset when you spread those lies. Have I responded in a less than
charitable way before? Sure I have. But I repented. Remember, Jesus warned
Peter that Satan was trying to "sift" him, but he would return to the Lord.
Peter denied knowing Jesus three times, but he repented and was forgiven. Did
you ever think that perhaps Catholics who got upset were also being "sifted",
and that perhaps they felt very badly afterwards, and repented of their sin?
Which do you think is worse: continuing to spread lies over and over again, or
getting angry about a lie, then repenting of that anger? Just a few things for
you to think about.
Yours in Christ (Yes, we are Christians)
Doug
Paul Tooley
I'm looking forward to you reply. The way I see it nobody is addressing the
issues that separate Catholics and Protestants, they are just emotionally
trying to bash what ever they don't understand. I can tell you that a lot
of myths I used to believe about Catholics have disappeared.
I really can't figure out how a dialogue could ever be established with out
first over coming the sola scriptura vs. apostolic tradition debate. When
we have two separate authorities there seems to be no common grounds for
debate on any other issue and no common judge to settle issues.
Sincerely,
Paul
"Doug" <happy...@cs.comnojunk> wrote in message
news:20020211205511...@mb-cj.news.cs.com...
Doug
addressing the charges that the Pope is the Anti-Christ, and all of the
arguments that have been put forward to promote that idea. As far as Sola
Scriptura goes, Catholics believe that we have not one, but two authorities:
Scripture and Tradition. Catholics do not reject the authority of Scripture,
as some people claim, but we do look to tradition for insight into how to
interpret the scriptures, and that is where the real crux of the problem lies.
There were plenty of traditions that contradict scripture, and those were
rejected as heresy long ago. I don't think that most Catholics and Protestants
are that far off in how they view the authority of Scripture, even if they are
in how it is interpreted.
Yours in Christ
Doug
Doug
> At times I find it difficult to make a verbal separation. I therefore
> call Catholics Catholics, and I call the Jesuits and people here well
> into the treason "Dark Ages Catholics." These are the ones who are
> despots and who are intolerant, but cover it over and charge their
> enemies with all their training
Ted, did you see my post titled "True Story of a Jesuit Infiltrator"?
Read that and you'll see what the Jesuits do when somebody doesn't
like them. It's not what you seem to think it is. They respond with
love, not hate.
Doug
Lamarr Edwards
explore the differences between Catholicism and Protestantism in a
Christian fashion!
The ill will and anger that is engendered by folks on both sides of the
issue is very sad.
Peace to you both, I will be following with interest.LE
Joe Crow
You say you believe in the Sabbath, yet many of your members diligently
seek occupations that causes them to work on the Sabbath. You no longer
believe that Christ was beaten for our healing. You believe in drugs and
cutting and I agree with many others that you have tons of graven
images. You call the pope the antichrist, yet you teach that many
catholics are christians. You teach going to church on Sunday is the
mark of the beast. Then you say "That' okay". It is obivious you don't
believe in Gods Commandments.
Lamarr Edwards
to who you were adressing, I assume they were adressed to me, please
forgive me if I am wrong.
17 years????? Others may agree with you in that SDA's have "graven
images" or " idols" but you have yet to identify them.
I must assume that you believe the sick should be left unattended on the
sabbath, ambulances must not run on the sabbath, accident victims should
not be treated on the sabbath etc., etc.,
Then said Jesus unto them, "I will ask you one thing;Is it lawful on the
sabbath day to do good or to do evil?, to save life or to destroy it?
Luke 6;9 As you know, right after this question, he answered it, by
healing, by doing good.
No one is tainted by the mark of the beast, yet, all can buy and sell,
all can worship freely, that is to come.LE
Ted McMillan
Friend,
If you can see these crimes of the Adventist Church, but you cannot
see another religion whose crimes are infinitely more, you are a child
of the Antichrist.
Tell us what prophecy means then. Tell us about the concerns of the
Lord. Is the Adventist Church in prophecy for crimes? If you harp on
her crimes you will be included in the prophecy of the retribution of
the crimes described in the prophecy.
Ted McMillan
I hope that Vatican Lamarr will stop judging the motives of people and
will realize why a Korean lady found it necessary to protest against
the Japanese government doing everything possible to gut out the
record of her sub-animality.
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/Contention.htm
Arco-Jeth
Elect.
A member of 7thDay Adventists, no wonder they are to good to need the silly
words of God, they make it up as they go and damn anyone who gets in their
way.
Enjoy yourself after the Rapture, Ted, since you and your lot will not be
going home with the rest of us.
Shalom,
Arco
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02021...@posting.google.com...
Ted McMillan
> >Maybe if you shared truth and facts. From what I have read, may of your
> >"truths" and "facts" would be better described as your beliefs. It is ok to
> >share your beliefs and to offer support for them, but it seems you fail to
> >understand the difference.
> > So if it is your conclusion that we are hopeless (that is we will not
> >blindly accept your opinions) and you have no interest in ours, then it must
> >be time for you to shake the dust from your sandals and move on.
> >
> >--
> >Dia 's Muire duit
>
> Don't expect that bit of logic to work with Nick.
How can super-criminals see any logic?
> I've posted that bit of
> biblical wisdom for the past year but apparently Nicholas has erased that from
> his already abridged bible.
Your history is full of "wisdom" but it is colored Red. The
Protestants must have had abridged and different version bibles also.
Why do you degrade people just because they disagree with the
antichrist and with you?
> Kind of reminds me of the Robert Tilton affair but
> I digress. Pick and choose,cut and paste, the same old ways of Nicholas. It
> gets a little boring after awhile.
Old ways! How long were you a murderous cult of people? Your timing
is clearly off base just like Ted Seeber telling us that the
principles of liberty in the United States are "incredibly stupid" and
"outdated." When I asked him when these principles began, he said 500
years with Martin Luther. When I asked him the origin date for his
contrary principles, he dared not give an answer.
Ted McMillan
> Ted McMillan, nope can't say his name ever came up in the rolls of God's
> Elect.
But others are supposed to say that you are judgmental, accusative and
therefore "incomprehensible." Likely they will keep quiet since you
also act as if you were trained behind the walls of the Vatican. Who
are you to judge, Jesuit?
> A member of 7thDay Adventists, no wonder they are to good to need the silly
> words of God, they make it up as they go and damn anyone who gets in their
> way.
Vatican Angelo and Cindy, SICK 'EM! SICK 'EM! Here is another person
who violates your preachings and teachings just as well as you do.
Suffering clearly also from despotism. How can he prove his Vatican
allegations?
> Enjoy yourself after the Rapture, Ted, since you and your lot will not be
> going home with the rest of us.
We don't want to go to your home. We prefer to go where the
mass-murdered are going.
>
> Shalom,
>
> Arco
What does "shalom" mean? Judgmental?
Ted McMillan
> >> >Dia 's Muire duit
> >>
> >> Don't expect that bit of logic to work with Nick.
> >
> >How can super-criminals see any logic?
>
> then I don't know any so I can't really confirm that.
>
> >> I've posted
> that bit of
> >> biblical wisdom for the past year but apparently Nicholas has erased that
> from
> >> his already abridged bible.
> >
> >Your history is full of "wisdom" but it is colored Red. The
> >Protestants must have had abridged and different version bibles also.
> >Why do you degrade people just because they disagree with the
> >antichrist and with you?
> giving me apples when I am discussing oranges.
Why give me fruit when I am discussing serious issues?
> I was talking about Nick, who
> likes to post biblical qoutes, and his unability to recognize the shaking of
> sandals passage in Matthew. That's the only response he can give, because ,to
> be fair, he can't come up with a good argument.
But you are a Vatican. How can you come to the conclusion that facts
are true?
> Now, if you
> are discussing history, yes it's true Catholicism has a colorful history.That
> is what it is however, ancient history.
You mean since Ted Seeber even on October 5, of last year gloated that
Rome persecuted and put many Christians to death because they didn't
"live the bible" to his standards? I have been crying about that all
to this day and every Vatican attacked me telling the world I am "evil
Ted" and "incomprehensible" because I reproved the super-terrorist.
No Catholic has said a single word against him for doing that.
Don't tell me about any ancient history! It is you who hate facts!
> Protestant never tortured and burned
> people, right? As the little girl in Full House always said," please".
We have discussed this over and over again. IT IS IN PROTESTANT
DOCUMENTATION EVEN OF THE HISTORY OF AMERICA THAT PROTESTANTS HAVE
DONE THIS. You know that and I know that. There were even arguments
of Protestants against Protestants where one and the other and against
themselves both they accused one another of not coming fully out of
Rome.
Still their doctrines don't mandate this unlike Rome. They
established the principle of Separation of Church and State, and this
principle prevents religious persecution. That was the reason why it
was enacted. Rome is the only power that stood against it without
let-up.
> FYI I
> don't degrade people with my post, but if you wish I will use your term for
> lack of a better word. I only degrade people because of their intellectual
> dishonesty.
You have made some claims. We also make claims. You defacate on our
claims and claim that we must respect your lies. I don't accept your
claims as proof for anything.
> Nicholas once agreed that he wore his ignorance like a banner. As
> for the Antichrist, I really don't know what Nero thought.
There you go. You are a trained deceiver. The bible tells us in the
Revelation that one of the purposes of Christ's Second Coming is to
rescue His church and people from the tyranny and persecution of the
Antichrist. The book of Revelation revealing the antichrist was
written after Nero's death or at least talked about issues after its
writing down to the end of the world.
> hmmm... To be
> fair
As you have just shown a lack of already...
, I believe you really believe the Antichrist is the Pope and you are
> entitled to your beliefs as long as you admit that they are beliefs and not
> truth.
I admit that because you disagree with the truth, you mandate that we
have to call them just beliefs and not true. You will be offended if
you are known to be a despot however.
> If you can't admit that, then you have no right to come to this
> newsgroup because you are being intellectually dishonest.
Of course, just because a Vatican despot says so!
? You can continue, but
> then you become a troll as defined by Nettiquite rules.
He means by Vatican rules.
> I'm sorry but your rants sound like paranoiac delusions.
When you disagree with them.
> I am one to admit
> that just because one is paranood does not mean that someone is not out to get
> you, but, and this is a big but, your posts sound like you are trying to write
> the screenplay for Conspiracy Theory 2.
Even those media productions were apparently to more accommodate the
right to disagree. How come these Vatican conspirators always come
among us to debate and discuss on the paramters that everyone has a
right to disagree, but when we show them we know about the Conspiracy,
they name-call us? How come they forget their highest crusade against
name-calling? Are we being too accurate when we show they are the
workers of the antichrist and are in super-treason?
> I don't know if you believe your rants.
> I hope not.
I don't believe that the truth is called rants just because
unscrupulous despots and reincarnates of the Dark Ages say so just
because we disagree with them.
> Kind of reminds me of
> the Robert Tilton affair but
> >> I digress. Pick and choose,cut and paste, the same old ways of Nicholas.
Nicholas proves the truth here. No facts were even brought by the
man, but, as common, we disagree with him and he forgets all his
Vatican preaching against name-calling and against allowing
disagreement.
>It
> >> gets a little boring after awhile.
What a liar! If that were so, you all would allow us to post and you
would sleep at night.
> >Old ways! How long were you a murderous cult of people? Your timing
> >is clearly off base just like Ted Seeber telling us that the
> >principles of liberty in the United States are "incredibly stupid" and
> >"outdated." When I asked him when these principles began, he said 500
> >years with Martin Luther. When I asked him the origin date for his
> >contrary principles, he dared not give an answer.
>Quit confusing
> thw issues of oranges by bringing up apples.
Go to your garden and get off these newsgroups!
> I know you are intelligent to
> understand the allusion I was referring to by bringing up Robert Tilton.
The illusion that people can disagree with you, but...
> Stay
> focused,
On your lies.
> the post was about Nicholas and his refusal (in my belief) to be
> intellectually honest.
FINALLY A STATEMENT THAT IT IS JUST HIS INTERPRETATION!!
> >Ted McMillan
> >tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
> >THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
> >http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
> >
> >
>
> See. You can understand what I mean by beliefs, the second level of truth.
> The last word on, not the Catholic truth, the Mormon, the protestant truth or
> even the athetist (they think we are delusionary anyway). It is the last word
> on Adventist truth. A perfect example of the second level of truth.
>
> God bless and goodbye. My finger are tired.
According to him, the first level is his beliefs, of course!