1. NcFTPd
2. ProFTPD
3. WU-FTPD
4. anything else ?
I'm looking for the one for home use and would like it to have easy
configuration (i.e. user access rights to directories).
thanks.
Eugene
Graham
"EugeneP" <eug...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:SZ%68.12247$liz....@news2.bloor.is...
> 1. NcFTPd
> 2. ProFTPD
> 3. WU-FTPD
> 4. anything else ?
4. sshd (sftp)
If I wanted my passwords to be known, I'd post them on usenet, and spare
people the trouble of sniffing them off insecure connections.
> I'm looking for the one for home use and would like it to have easy
> configuration (i.e. user access rights to directories).
If your permissions are set correctly, and 'untrusted' users are jail(8)ed or
chroot(8)ed, there's no problems.
- Philip
--
Philip Paeps phi...@paeps.cx
If the faulty part is in stock, it didn't need replacing
in the first place.
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, EugeneP wrote:
> which FTP server do you like more and why ?
>
> 1. NcFTPd
> 2. ProFTPD
> 3. WU-FTPD
> 4. anything else ?
Try vsftpd - small, very efficient (on i386SX/25 it gave 2x performance gain
versus standard FreeBSD's ftpd), aims to be "very secure" and it seems that
it in fact is (spawns second non-root process just like an Apache does).
Logs upload/download speed and even can log _every_ command/responce - very
handy beast! Also, doesn't eat 0xFF character in file name (which is being
used both in koi8-r/koi8-u and cp1251 cyrillic codepages - actual for me).
/usr/ports/ftp/vsftpd
Sincerely, Dmitry
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail: dmi...@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE
I used wu-ftpd for almost ten years and recently switched to
proftpd so I could authenticate users against a MySQL database.
I think proftpd works quite well and I like running it in
stand-alone mode, since I usually don't run inetd.
>> 4. anything else ?
>
>4. sshd (sftp)
>
>If I wanted my passwords to be known, I'd post them on usenet, and spare
>people the trouble of sniffing them off insecure connections.
When all of the horrible web publishing applications in the world
start supporting sftp I will dance a jig on the grave of FTP
right here on comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc.
Until then, I will use non-system passwords (ie, passwords I generate
and stick in a MySQL database) for FTP, and let users employ any
of those nasty WYSIWYG HTML generators they please.
--Paul
All of the above is not first choice, try PureFTP, and I guarantee you wont
consider anything else for a while.
> Hello All,
> which FTP server do you like more and why ?
>
> 1. NcFTPd
> 2. ProFTPD
> 3. WU-FTPD
> 4. anything else ?
I've had excellent results with Pro. I must point out something here
that, to my surprise, no one else has mentioned: avoid wu-ftpd like the
plague that it is. wu has fallen to more security issues and exploits
than any other FTP daemon I've seen yet. I know, it may be due to its
popularity, but Pro is just as popular these days, and I don't hear much
complaining about security problems there.
--
Michael Maxwell <mmaxwell at spss dot com>
Systems Specialist, SPSS, Inc.
Visit our web site at http://www.spss.com/
"Magnus" <sp...@me.com> wrote in message
news:eQh78.1355$xU.1...@news01.chello.no...
"EugeneP" <eug...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:SZ%68.12247$liz....@news2.bloor.is...
> The only answer to this question is the server that you like the best. They
> are are good servers, but they do the same thing a little differently! I
> use wu_ftpd on my liinux server, and proftpd on freebsd, wu_ftpd is pretty
> easy to setup, while proftpd gives you more control for your serving
> experince. One maybe a little faster than the other, but it is a matter of
> taste, you decide!
http://cr.yp.to/publicfile.html
As usual, attention to security and performance to a degree not
found in the other ftpd servers mentioned.