Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

BInd 9.1: multiple RRs of singleton type error

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Ansari

unread,
Feb 20, 2001, 9:03:36 AM2/20/01
to

Hi,

I am facing problem in running bind 9.1. Here is my /var/log/messages
log. Anyone can help me.

Thanx,
Nauman Ansari


Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27379]: starting BIND 9.1.0 -c
/var/named-9.1.0/name
d.boot
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27379]: using 1 CPU
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: loading configuration from
'/var/named-9.1.0
/named.boot'
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: the default for the 'auth-nxdomain'
option i
s now 'no'
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
than /lib/m
odules/2.2.16-22/modules.dep
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: no IPv6 interfaces found
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: listening on IPv4 interface lo,
127.0.0.1#53
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: listening on IPv4 interface eth0,
209.58.33.
71#53
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: dns_master_load: db.sdnpk:70:
multiple RRs o
f singleton type
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: dns_zone_load: zone sdnpk.org/IN:
loading ma
ster file db.sdnpk: multiple RRs of singleton type
Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: running


Mark.A...@nominum.com

unread,
Feb 20, 2001, 5:19:57 PM2/20/01
to

The usual culprit is multiple CNAMES though there are other
singlton types.

> Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: dns_zone_load: zone sdnpk.org/IN:
> loading ma
> ster file db.sdnpk: multiple RRs of singleton type
> Feb 21 08:23:47 ns2 ./named[27381]: running
>

--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.A...@nominum.com


Kevin Darcy

unread,
Feb 20, 2001, 6:12:59 PM2/20/01
to

CNAME and SOA are "singleton" record types -- you can only have one of
them for any given name. At line 70 of the db.sdnpk zone file, you
apparently have a CNAME (or, less likely, SOA) record with the same name
as a CNAME (or SOA) record defined earlier in the file.


- Kevin

Ansari wrote:

0 new messages