Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

#NICHOLAS ACCUSES ME OF SENDINIG HATE POSTS!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 27, 2002, 5:59:14 PM3/27/02
to
I already have, on March 21st, notified everyone that Nicholas has
accused me of sending hate posts against Cindy. Isn't it amazing the
fact that no comment or even amazement has come about this situation
yet?

All kinds of unnatural things take place with no explanation. We ask
the explanation and they can't give it. They then tell us there is no
conspiracy and get out of bed the moment we exercise our natural
rights and reveal the truth!


For the Work Finished!

Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Mar 27, 2002, 6:07:39 PM3/27/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...

> I already have, on March 21st, notified everyone that Nicholas has
> accused me of sending hate posts against Cindy. Isn't it amazing the
> fact that no comment or even amazement has come about this situation
> yet?
>
Nope... because we know you ARE sending hate posts Ted. That's clear in
most posts you ned.


> All kinds of unnatural things take place with no explanation. We ask
> the explanation and they can't give it. They then tell us there is no
> conspiracy and get out of bed the moment we exercise our natural
> rights and reveal the truth!
>

The truth you reveal is your own paranoia... you have not revealed
ANYTHING about a conspiracy.

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
With NINE Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source

billu

unread,
Mar 27, 2002, 6:20:18 PM3/27/02
to
Are you saying that Nicholas is a Vatican super terrorist? If so
please never utter the words, the poor man will probably
die straight away from a heart attack.

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...

Caillean McMahon

unread,
Mar 27, 2002, 8:39:12 PM3/27/02
to

billu wrote:
>
> Are you saying that Nicholas is a Vatican super terrorist? If so
> please never utter the words, the poor man will probably
> die straight away from a heart attack.
>

If a Witch can be a Vatical agent, I suppose that anyone can....sigh
Brightest Blessings;
Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 27, 2002, 9:55:37 PM3/27/02
to
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3ca25...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...

> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > I already have, on March 21st, notified everyone that Nicholas has
> > accused me of sending hate posts against Cindy. Isn't it amazing the
> > fact that no comment or even amazement has come about this situation
> > yet?
> >
> Nope... because we know you ARE sending hate posts Ted. That's clear in
> most posts you ned.

The Children of the Antichrist know what is clear? Well we know it is
clear that you have indeed murdered the saints ACCORDING TO YOUR
DOCTRINE. I happen to think that is worse than your wildest satanic
imaginations about hate posts. You all defend the satanic murderers
of the 20th Century, the Ustashis of WWII. Seeber argues against
liberty and condemns all non-Catholics. You all don't notice.

It is clear that you all are the epitome children of hate. Still, no
one mentioned about the revelation that Nicholas accused me of sending
in hate posts.

> > All kinds of unnatural things take place with no explanation. We ask
> > the explanation and they can't give it. They then tell us there is no
> > conspiracy and get out of bed the moment we exercise our natural
> > rights and reveal the truth!
> >
> The truth you reveal is your own paranoia... you have not revealed
> ANYTHING about a conspiracy.

I have revealed alot about your conspiracy. No despot without
evidence is going to prove anything here without a challenge. You all
are the children of hate, murder and paranoia. A dead prophet can
send you Antichrist chickens posting for dear life. You all can tell
me not to worry about your armies and super-treason, yet you can be
really concerned about Ted McMillan and a prophet dead for almost a
hundred years. So paranoid is your cult that you fib telling us Ellen
White is the Antichrist, and that word is as reliable as every other
word coming from the workers of the Antichrist.

We missed the questions however that you people can never answer.
Antichrist Cindy and the rest of you papists attack me constantly out
of paranoia because I condemned a super-terrorist trained by your
cult--a man who condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death.
All of a sudden the worst most uncivil posts are around and you
children of the Antichrist can't notice. This calls for an
explanation: not for the unchanging tactics of the despot cbildren of
the Antichrist.

Strange people are posting on all the "Adventist" forums. They are
posting with much emotion their irritation that the Adventist Church
claims to be the true church. That is true she does. They then twist
the words of Adventists and tell the world that they are claiming
superiority to their "FELLOW brothers and sisters in Christ." We then
show them the declaration of their Pope in 2000 that the Catholic
Church is the one and only true church, and all emotion, paranoia and
indignancy is gone. We can't even get the child of the Antichrist I
am posting against here to give us an answer to this strange
phenomenon. They complain about certain conditions, and when the SAME
conditions exist only with their Pope involved, there is no
irritation. They then despot babble that they are not Catholic.

As yet I never had to face evidence from Antichrist Nordmeyer just
like his bloody ancestors.

For the Work Finished!

Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com


>
>
>

Nicholas II

unread,
Mar 27, 2002, 11:14:24 PM3/27/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> I already have, on March 21st, notified everyone that Nicholas has
> accused me of sending hate posts against Cindy. Isn't it amazing the
> fact that no comment or even amazement has come about this situation
> yet?

I had no idea you posted this on March 21 Ted. I rarely scan other posts,
especially their threads.

First off, I shared my thoughts about your obvious hate filled posts towards
Cindy in private email Ted. I didn't want to make you look bad in front of
everyone in the NG because I believe you have a calling from on High to
expose the evils of Rome. Being a "Roman NG" I didn't want to harm you or
your message in any way. Secondly, when you persisted in slamming Cindy as
well as other people in the NG regardless if their Catholic or not, I tried
my best to ignore you. However, a few days ago I had to make a public stand
against your tactics because you seem to be getting a bit out of hand. I
believe you recall the post I put forth that merely said, "You need to
lighten up" Ted. After that post I was hoping you would realize how bad
things are getting. I hoped you would realize that it must be getting very
bad if a fellow believer in the Truth was reprimanding you in public for it,
even as gentle as that reprimand was. However, I see now you ignored that
warning as well, and have now placed me within your sites. No-matter, I have
been the target of ridicule from day one. I'm used to it.


--
...Nicholas
www.remnantofgod.org
www.localline2.com/~nicholas
www.linearg.com/remnantofgod/


bam

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 12:57:45 AM3/28/02
to
Just an observation from the outside, Nickie. I don't see (and I'll bet some
will agree with me) any material difference between you and Ted McMillan.
You're both anti -Catholics that have gone nuts.

BAM


"Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message
news:3ca295b1$2...@news.nntpserver.com...

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 8:05:15 AM3/28/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> "Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
news:<3ca25...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
> > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> > news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > > I already have, on March 21st, notified everyone that Nicholas has
> > > accused me of sending hate posts against Cindy. Isn't it amazing
the
> > > fact that no comment or even amazement has come about this
situation
> > > yet?
> > >
> > Nope... because we know you ARE sending hate posts Ted. That's
clear in
> > most posts you ned.
>
> The Children of the Antichrist know what is clear?

Namecalling again Ted?

Snipped the rest, since it is clearly a non-Christian posting.

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 8:05:31 AM3/28/02
to

"Caillean McMahon" <cail...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3CA27440...@yahoo.com...

Did you get the secret handshake?

Nicholas II

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 8:33:05 AM3/28/02
to

"Paul" <pa...@tooley.com> wrote in message
news:3ca2b4af$1...@corp-news.newsgroups.com...

...snip

>
> > your message in any way. Secondly, when you persisted in slamming Cindy
as
> > well as other people in the NG regardless if their Catholic or not, I
> tried
>

> Please clarify this statement. It appears as if you are indicating it is
> alright to slam Catholics.

No that's not what I meant. What I meant was, Ted was slamming everyone,
Catholics as well as non Catholics.

--
__________________________
Presents of God ministry
--------------------------
Devastatingly accurate prophecies authenticated with
historic facts confirming Antichrist resides in Vatican!
Over 1900 pages of documented researchable facts.

Site locations:
USA - www.remnantofgod.org
USA - www.localline2.com/~nicholas
AUST - www.linearg.com/remnantofgod/

The "major" prophetic facts... Summarized
http://www.remnantofgod.org/666-CHAR.htm

______________________
!!!!ANIMATIONS!!!!
----------------------

ANTICHRIST SLIDESHOW
http://www.remnantofgod.org/flash/acssmenu.html

NEW!!! WHORE OF BABLYON REVEALED
http://www.remnantofgod.org/flash/whore/whoremenu.html
_______________________


"Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and shew my people
their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins." -Isaiah 58:1


Truth is truth.
...Nicholas

FTT

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 8:54:16 AM3/28/02
to

"Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message
news:3ca3189c$1...@news.1usenet.com...

>
> "Paul" <pa...@tooley.com> wrote in message
> news:3ca2b4af$1...@corp-news.newsgroups.com...
>
> ...snip
>
> >
> > > your message in any way. Secondly, when you persisted in slamming
Cindy
> as
> > > well as other people in the NG regardless if their Catholic or not, I
> > tried
> >
> > Please clarify this statement. It appears as if you are indicating it
is
> > alright to slam Catholics.
>
> No that's not what I meant. What I meant was, Ted was slamming everyone,
> Catholics as well as non Catholics.
>
>
Once again Nickie's stupid logic comes through.

Of course it's alright for Nickie ( in his own demented logic)
to slam Catholics but it becomes objectional when someone
slams "non Catholics" ( of course only those of his own
demented ilk of though - all other "non Catholics" are fair game
for Nickie et al)

Hoooooooo Hummmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!
FTT


billu

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 9:43:58 AM3/28/02
to
This would make a good bout in newsgroup boxing... Nicholas vs Ted

I get a chuckle just thinking about it.

"FTT" <f...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:Z9Fo8.19800$mA1.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 3:16:37 PM3/28/02
to
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3ca3150b$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...

> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > "Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
> news:<3ca25...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
> > > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> > > news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > > > I already have, on March 21st, notified everyone that Nicholas has
> > > > accused me of sending hate posts against Cindy. Isn't it amazing
> the
> > > > fact that no comment or even amazement has come about this
> situation
> > > > yet?
> > > >
> > > Nope... because we know you ARE sending hate posts Ted. That's
> clear in
> > > most posts you ned.
> >
> > The Children of the Antichrist know what is clear?
>
> Namecalling again Ted?

Unscrupulous again Antichrist Nordmeyer? Presenting posts without
evidence or education? Failing to notice that a super-terrorist
reincarnate from the Dark Ages condemned all non-Catholics again
Antichrist Nordy? A worker for the Antichrist still?

> Snipped the rest, since it is clearly a non-Christian posting.

Making despot statements again and accusing someone just because he
disagrees with you Antichrist Nordy? Paranoid about McMillan's
postings again Antichrist Nordy?

Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 3:39:53 PM3/28/02
to

I see more namecalling and snipped the irrational and incoherent rants
about a "superterrorist" ... your rants are meaningless Ted. You seem
to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
___" or a superterrorist. The simple fact is Ted, you are NOT
Christlike in your actions, or behavior.

I, and I'm sure many others, will continue to pray for you... your
hatred is quite disturbing.

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 3:41:20 PM3/28/02
to
mmsic...@cs.cominvalid (MMSICILIANA) wrote in message news:<20020328001320...@mb-mf.news.cs.com>...
> In article <3ca295b1$2...@news.nntpserver.com>, "Nicholas II"
> Here they go again, fighting amongst themselves on the Catholic newsgroup. And
> they think this will make us want to follow their lead? No thanks!

I beg your pardon Madam Antichrist:

We are NOT the despots. YOU ARE! There is even a poster on the
Atomorrow "Adventist" forum by the login name of "Jodi Thiessen."
That forum claims to be established to allow people in Adventism or
around it to freely express their beliefs. They claim this is
necessary because the Adventist Church leadership are too rigid in
their beliefs and will not allow members to disagree freely. How do
they know? Because they had already demanded that the Adventist
Church totally change their structure to allow for an ecumenical union
with all churches. The Adventist Church refused, so you cannot think
they would agree to wipe the dust off of their feet. NO! They
establish another forum to more press their ideas and point.

Jodi Thiessen, being also just as unscrupulous as you guys, begins to
post telling us that we must unite with all the other churches. This
is unbridled ecumenism: an exclusively papal concept. The problem
naturally is that the mandate will not be properly expressed to
everyone. It appears that she just wants us to have fellowship with
other Christians, but that is clearly not the case. She posts that we
have to give up our beliefs and come together. What beliefs? The
ones she disagrees with, OF COURSE! Yet these are the people who in
an instant would accuse me of calling people Jesuits, "just because
they disagree with me." I did not move from my religious sphere to go
to any other and tell them they have to give up their beliefs.

Knowing that Jodi Thiessen works for the Pope, I naturally reveal it.
Her response? Of course she ridicules me, and her fellow papists do
the same. What does she do next? She send in a post telling us how
we are all naturally Catholic. She quickly jumps to show us that
"catholic" means universal. In the post she tells us again that we
are all going to have to give up our beliefs and unite with all other
Christians waiting for the day of the Lord's return. I asked her many
times what will happen to those who refuse since her demands were made
many times by Rome throughout the Christian age. She has used every
evasive tactic as the children of the Antichrist here on the
newsgroups have demonstrated.

I then prove her ecumenical claims wrong. She quoted scriptures
showing us that the Christian Church is ONE BODY and must be united.
I pointed out that the people who wrote that scripture had no such
demands. There were the followers of Christ and the followers of John
the Baptist. The followers of Christ did not make a single demand for
the followers of John the Baptist to give up their beliefs and unite.
I then pointed out Mark 9 to them where the Disciples told Christ that
a man was casting out demons in His name. The Disciples told Christ
that they forbade him "because he followeth not with us." Now was the
perfect time for Christ to tell the man he had to give up his beliefs
and liberties so that he can join. THAT DID NOT HAPPEN. There was
shown the total difference between Christians and the Vaticans.

She has not answered my points yet. VERY VERY TYPICAL! All she posts
are attacks, insults and condemnations against me. She also has that
terrible papal concern about uncivil postings, but she easily adds
them as if she never had a problemm with them JUST AS ON THESE
NEWSGROUPS!


Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 28, 2002, 10:25:33 PM3/28/02
to
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3ca37f91$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...

Are you name-calling and accusing Antichrist Will?

> You seem
> to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
> ___" or a superterrorist.

But you DEFINITELY are an Antichrist Vatican Superterrorist. There's
just no doubt here. You are also unmeasurably unscrupulous. You
disobey all even your own rules. I'm sorry you work for the
Antichrist just because it's true.


> The simple fact is Ted, you are NOT
> Christlike in your actions, or behavior.

You are finally right, Antichrist Will. The scriptures tell us Christ
will burn people like you till both body and soul are destroyed. I am
not that bad. You murderers from the Papacy are too righteous to live
with a person like that, and so He will make sure that you don't.

On the other hand, you keep attacking and insulting just like "Teddy
McMillan" and the other unscrupulous even illegal posters. You cannot
see that one of your Antichrist super-terrorist friends has condemned
all non-Catholics. Clearly you are one of the super-terrorists of the
Antichrist possessing no natural affection to non-Catholics.

> I, and I'm sure many others, will continue to pray for you... your
> hatred is quite disturbing.

And I will continue to talk about the millions of non-Catholics you
evil people heartlessly murdered to the point where you cannot even
notice someone who condemned all non-Catholics. Your dark satanic
minds cannot notice true hate, unless of course if the minds of all
free peoples were opened and they moved to murder you guys in half the
way it is recorded you all have murdered others.

I love you Antichrist Nordy! I love you!! Don't you love me??

Calm down dear Inquisitor! Your hate is showing!


The Lord bless you and keep you.
The Lord let his face shine upon you, and be gracious to you.
The Lord look upon you kindly and give you peace.
Numbers 6: 24-26


Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Mar 29, 2002, 7:57:07 AM3/29/02
to
Nope... Ted is your name... I'm calling you TED... that's not
namecalling...


Snipped the rest of the rant. Until Ted figures out that HE IS calling
people names and acting VERY unchristian.

Dolf Boek

unread,
Mar 29, 2002, 10:14:26 AM3/29/02
to
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
news:3ca46...@news5.uncensored-news.com...

Nope... Ted is your name... I'm calling you TED... that's not
namecalling...

Snipped the rest of the rant. Until Ted figures out that HE IS calling
people names and acting VERY unchristian.

DOLF BOEK RESPONDS:
No more unChristian than denying people their human rights for no other
reason than your own affections with you erroneously acquaint with sanctity.
We know that most Christian faith is nothing more than a creature with a
proud accessorised look--A wedding ring.

--

- dolf

Why should our souls be so daily vexed, depart and leave us our lot?

'Telos' 122J 3W 1D = 'arch' 0J 0W 0D + c² {

22/7=3W1D {22 Hebrew letters/7th day}
...
Law@Sinai = {50J}
Xerxes in 457 BCE {72J2W1D}
Jesus {10J=490 years - cryptic prophecy}
Telos {Y6K = 122J3W1D & Y2K/Jubilee2000 myth}
}

http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/dolfboek/meta/time.html#BEGIN

This message doesn't constitute authorisation or acceptance by its author,
of the use of their email address for the purposes of unsolicited email
known as 'SPAM'.

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 29, 2002, 5:09:43 PM3/29/02
to
Antichrist paranoic Nordmeyer wrote quoting me:

"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3ca46...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...

> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...

> > Are you name-calling and accusing Antichrist Will?
> >
> Nope... Ted is your name... I'm calling you TED... that's not
> namecalling...

> Snipped the rest of the rant. Until Ted figures out that HE IS calling
> people names and acting VERY unchristian.

I reproved a super-terrorist for condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics. All your fellow workers of the Antichrist, including
yourself, have approached to attack me because of paranoia. Since I
reproved the super terrorist, that has concerned men of equal mind.
Now, back to my pressing question:

WAS IT UNCHRISTIAN THAT I REPROVED THE SUPER-TERRORIST? WAS IT
UNCHRISTIAN THAT YOU ALL IGNORED HIM AND ATTACKED ONLY THE MAN WHO HAD
NATURAL AFFECTION AND A RESPECT FOR HUMAN LIFE.

Nordmeyer is a worker for the Antichrist. Is that just because he
disagrees with me as he will naturally state from his trained Vatican
talents? See their most conealed attributes on the following webpage:

http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/AntiJesM.htm

Is is Christian that Antichrist Nordmeyer also has only attacked me
because and since I reproved a man who condemned all non-Catholics?
What would have been the reaction if I said that all Catholics should
be persecuted and killed because they do not live the bible according
to how I see fit?


Folks, I am not paranoid like the workers of the Antichrist here.
Sticks and stones can break my bones, but names will never hurt me.
Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death. That
terrible example of super-terrorism cannot bother Antichrist Nordmeyer
because he also is one. He is also complaining that I have called the
super-terrorist names. There is nothing I can do about their terrible
Antichrist paranoia.

However, Antichrist Nordmeyer has describe me as being delirious and
calling people names just because they disagree. He has therefore
called me irrational, delusive, despotic and a bunch of names. He
knows this, but remember, to him and his brothers of the Antichrist,
YOU are the stupid and damned heretics and they will demonstrate they
believe this by the things they do with your intelligence.


Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 29, 2002, 11:26:44 PM3/29/02
to
"Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message news:<3ca295b1$2...@news.nntpserver.com>...

> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > I already have, on March 21st, notified everyone that Nicholas has
> > accused me of sending hate posts against Cindy. Isn't it amazing the
> > fact that no comment or even amazement has come about this situation
> > yet?
>
> I had no idea you posted this on March 21 Ted. I rarely scan other posts,
> especially their threads.
>
> First off, I shared my thoughts about your obvious hate filled posts towards
> Cindy in private email Ted.

I see someon has become the despot like the ones he constantly
condemns. Isn't it weird that even the language is just like the
workers of the Antichrist? Nick leaves no room for anyone to disagree
with him. Obvious to Nick, my posts are hate-filled. I mean, if
Osama was about to strike again and I reproved the man for the benefit
of all, what would Nick do. Will he do the same as the reest?

No wonder no one seems to be bulging out their eyes about Nick
accusing others of making hate-filled posts. Obviously Nick really
works for the Antichrist. So many Adventist leaders have been doing
that and making the most profound Revelation seminars exposing Rome.

Nick you mean I am a hateful person just because I disagree with you?
Your wording is so similar to the postings of hate against me by those
you condemn so much, you have caused me to wonder.

I can't help it if I have respect for human life Nick. Ted Seeber
condemned the lives of all non-Catholics. Antichrist Cindy came in to
defend and cover up what Ted Seeber had done. Ted Seeber could not
deny my accusations against him. For two months he posted not the
slightest contradiction to my exposes about him. Antichrist Cindy and
the rest came along telling me that I name-called and was uncivil in
posting and therefore the fact that Ted Seeber gloated that
Protestants have been killed and told us that all non-Catholics also
should be persecuted and killed doesn't matter.

Next now all those who have been teaching me against making uncivil
postings have been doing that all along. The worst post headers with
no messages within have been posted by Antichrist Lamarr Edwards.
Antichrist Cindy remains silent and doesn't notice the irritation that
caused her from day one to attack me only.

> I didn't want to make you look bad in front of
> everyone in the NG because I believe you have a calling from on High to
> expose the evils of Rome. Being a "Roman NG" I didn't want to harm you or
> your message in any way. Secondly, when you persisted in slamming Cindy as
> well as other people in the NG regardless if their Catholic or not, I tried
> my best to ignore you.

The problem is that they are Catholic. How do I know? I don't go by
what they claim. I told them I was loving and they slammed me. You
just slammed my claim also. I will not allow you to despot me telling
the world regardless of whether they are Catholic or not. Everyone I
have identified is Catholic.

I charge you to explain why they don't care that all non-Catholics
have been condemned to persecution and death by Antichrist Ted Seeber.
They keep posting about uncivil posts and ignore the issue of blood.
I have asked Antichrist Cindy why she, CLAIMING to be Protestant has
not dared to say an ill word against Ted Seeber even though he has
condemned all non-Catholics, but has attacked ONLY me.

I want you to give a concise answer now and not play the Jesuit. I
don't want to see any evasion or any Vatican babble. I want you to
answer the question that has been evaded by all these workers for the
Antichrist for so long.

> However, a few days ago I had to make a public stand
> against your tactics because you seem to be getting a bit out of hand.

You mean because a despot babbles so? You seem to be seeing things
just because people disagree with you.

> I
> believe you recall the post I put forth that merely said, "You need to
> lighten up" Ted. After that post I was hoping you would realize how bad
> things are getting.

But where does the bible say I have to frame my thinking according to
newly crowned despot Nick? There is something called freedom and the
right to disagree. I will now give you the opportunity to show that
you are different from these other workers of the Antichrist. I want
you to deal with the issues.

> I hoped you would realize that it must be getting very
> bad if a fellow believer in the Truth was reprimanding you in public for it,
> even as gentle as that reprimand was. However, I see now you ignored that
> warning as well, and have now placed me within your sites. No-matter, I have
> been the target of ridicule from day one. I'm used to it.

I have even shown you terrible postings showing the arrogance and
deceit of Antichrist Cindy. Nick, I am also used to despot attacking
me while teaching me not to do it as you have. I am used to despots
telling me how obvious without the shadow of a doubt I am evil because
they said so. I am also used to it.

You have before shown yourself a man by providing more evidence that
the other workers of the Antichrist posting here who have not now
noticed that you accused me of something you are normally accused of
while you are teaching me not to accuse. You now must be shown what
Antichrist Cindy has done and you need to provide a reason for her
Antichristian behavior you have completely ignored even over the
bodies and blood of the saints. All non-Catholics were condemned by
Seeber. She could not see that for obvious reasons. I am going to
charge you to provide evidence for you attacks and accusations.

Exposing the atrocities of Rome is a mission of love. Have you
finally admitted somewhere that you are now in the ranks of your
enemies? Are you, Nick, willing to admit that you now DOUBTLESS
OBVIOUSLY regularly post hate-postings against Catholics? It is you
who have adopted the new language and speak as a despot.

Ted McMillan
tmac1238@seventh-dayadventism.

Cindy

unread,
Mar 30, 2002, 10:23:03 AM3/30/02
to
This issue is not between me and you Ted. Neither is it another's job to
defend, or condemn me. There is one mediator, and one Judge only. Jesus
Christ the only begotten son of God, our Savior.


Rom 14:7 For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.
Rom 14:8 For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we
die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's.
Rom 14:9 For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he
might be Lord both of the dead and living.
Rom 14:10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at
nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of
Christ.
Rom 14:11 For it is written, [As] I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall
bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
Rom 14:12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
Rom 14:13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this
rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in [his]
brother's way.

In His Grace,
Cindy

Andrew

unread,
Mar 30, 2002, 9:53:56 AM3/30/02
to

"Ted McMillan" writes condemning Nicholas
and identifies him with the Antichrist power.. .. ..


> I see someon has become the despot.


>
> Obviously Nick really works for the Antichrist.
>

> It is you who have adopted the new language and speak as a despot.
>
> Ted McMillan

Nick has tried to reason with Ted to hopefully help him to
see that his methods were in rebellion against the example
and teachings of Jesus Christ.

This was rejected...and Ted turns his weapons against Nick.
Long ago the wise man has said ... ... ...

"He that reproveth a scorner getteth to himself shame:
and he that rebuketh a wicked man getteth himself a blot.
Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise
man, and he will love thee."

Proverbs 9:7-8


With the inclusion of Nick...this now makes for that *everyone
who has ever attempted to dialogue with Ted McMillan has been
ridiculed by him and labeled as being of the Antichrist.


When Jesus interacted with others, He was redemptive. He saw
that through His grace the most degraded could become children
of the Most High. His life was a constant revelation of love for
others. He was not constantly condemning those who were the
objects of His redemptive mission.


"For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world;
but that the world through him might be saved.

John 3:17


When we love the world as He has loved it___when we love others
as He loves them, then, only then can we work for the advancement
of His cause and His kingdom.

Donna Conard

unread,
Mar 30, 2002, 5:03:14 PM3/30/02
to
"Andrew" <and...@321.net> wrote in message news:<a84jcd$92d$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...

Andrew,

AMEN AND AMEN!! Two things come to mind. "By beholding we become
changed." "My sheep hear my voice and they follow me." When we behold
the Lord and the awesome love He has for us, we cannot keep from
loving Him in return. When we truly love Him, we will love ALL of our
fellowman. We will hear the Lord's voice through the Holy Spirit when
we read scripture and when He speaks to us in person and we will
follow and do and say what He tells us to. And, as you say, then we
will be advancing His cause and His kingdom.

In His awesome love,

Donna

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 30, 2002, 8:29:36 PM3/30/02
to
Antichrist Andrew speaks about his foremost concern and religion:

"Andrew" <and...@321.net> wrote in message news:<a84jcd$92d$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...

> "Ted McMillan" writes condemning Nicholas
> and identifies him with the Antichrist power.. .. ..
>
>
> > I see someon has become the despot.
> >
> > Obviously Nick really works for the Antichrist.
> >
> > It is you who have adopted the new language and speak as a despot.
> >
> > Ted McMillan
>
>
>
> Nick has tried to reason with Ted to hopefully help him to
> see that his methods were in rebellion against the example
> and teachings of Jesus Christ.

Antichrist Andrew is telling me that my posts are unchristian. Does
he work for the Antichrist? I already gave prime examples of Jesus
calling other demon-possessed people liars and children of the Devil.
So far again the workers of the Antichrist have not dealt with
evidence.

He now tells us that Nick has tried to reason with Ted but Ted M
condemned him just because Ted M disagrees with Antichrist Andrew.

AMAZINGLY WHILE THE NEW DESPOT NICK HAS ACCUSED ME OF WHAT THE WORKERS
OF THE ANTICHRIST HAVE ALWAYS BEEN ACCUSING HIM OF, NONE OF THEM
APPEAR TO BE EXPRESSING SURPRISE!

I am about to test the new Nick. Will he deal with the evidence? Or
will he act like Antichrist Cindy, Lamarr, Andrew, Angelo and the rest
in using all kinds of Jesuit arts to evade them. We still have it
that Antichrist Cindy has attacked ONLY Ted McMillan. I asked the new
Nick to stop making his Antichrist accusations but to get to the
bottom of what happened. That means to consider what Ted Seeber has
done and then what followed in the attacks of Antichrist Cindy. I
predict that the new Nick is going to perform just like Antichrist
Cindy and Angelo to either tell me that he will not consider Ted
Seeber, what he has done is not important or that I must not bring him
up.

This is rather tragic, for in all Nick's exposes on his Antichrist the
other professed workers of the Antichrist have insulted him and told
him that he must not bring up issues 500 years in the past. But now
Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics boldly on the newsgroups
December 5, 2001. This would convey the idea that Nick's obvious
hate-postings against all Catholics were correct.

Let us now see what the man does. I say he will now demonstrate
Jesuit tactics and will not deal with the evidence nor answer the
questions. I have already told him to study the issue out before
despot condemning me with his despot accusations. He, like Antichrist
Cindy, has not listened.

Now deal with this issue. We found out now Nick, that what you said
about Rome not changing is correct. Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics to persecution and death. Let's see you now cuddle up
to the workers of the Antichrist you have been condemning with your
obvious no-doub hate-postings against all Catholics.

But now let's go to Jesuit Andrew who has taught us against making
accusations, etc:

> This was rejected...and Ted turns his weapons against Nick.
> Long ago the wise man has said ... ... ...
>
> "He that reproveth a scorner getteth to himself shame:
> and he that rebuketh a wicked man getteth himself a blot.
> Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise
> man, and he will love thee."
>
> Proverbs 9:7-8

Jesuit Andrew I have rebuked thy unscrupulousness for a while now, but
you are always so busy quoting scripture against the crimes that you
do freely, no wonder you hate the ground I walk on. All your posts
focus on your religion.

> With the inclusion of Nick...this now makes for that *everyone
> who has ever attempted to dialogue with Ted McMillan has been
> ridiculed by him and labeled as being of the Antichrist.

To a despot, yes. Nick is being unscrupulous here also, but I am not
afraid. Everyone who bypasses the evidence and is unscrupulous will
be labeled by me according to their talent. The more it is true is
the more they will break their rules and forget posting about Christ
to post against me.

Jesuit Andrew, I believe recently that you quoted to us that Love
records no wrongs. What is that statement saying about my past?

> When Jesus interacted with others, He was redemptive. He saw
> that through His grace the most degraded could become children
> of the Most High. His life was a constant revelation of love for
> others. He was not constantly condemning those who were the
> objects of His redemptive mission.

I have just quoted scripture where Christ called people far more
virtuous than these Jesuits, liars and children of Satan. Now deal
with the issue Antichrist Andrew and correspond to the evidence I have
shown. Your agenda is the same as Antichrist Cindy and all the rest.
Nick now joins you all.

Will Nick deal with the issue starting from Ted Seeber? Likely NO!

> "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world;
> but that the world through him might be saved.
>
> John 3:17

"For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn Ted McMillan;


but that the world through him might be saved.

John 3:17

Why then did Christ send Jesuit Andrew?

> When we love the world as He has loved it___when we love others
> as He loves them,

But Ted McMillan does love everyone. He loves Non-Catholics and
believes it a crime to kill or sanction that they be killed. Jesuit
Andrew doesn't. Therefore those who love know God. Jesuit Andrew
doesn't.

> then, only then can we work for the advancement
> of His cause and His kingdom.


When is Jesuit Andrew going to sever with his pope to first become a
human being with regard for human life, and then get promoted again to
jump into the service of Christ?


Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 30, 2002, 8:34:52 PM3/30/02
to
"Cindy" <synt...@localline.com> wrote in message news:<3ca5c8c7$1...@news.teranews.com>...

> This issue is not between me and you Ted. Neither is it another's job to
> defend, or condemn me. There is one mediator, and one Judge only. Jesus
> Christ the only begotten son of God, our Savior.

YOU ARE A LIAR IN THE EXTREME! You approached me telling me God has
shown you my need for having love in my soul. You came to that
conclusion because I reproved another terrorist such as yourself who
condemned all non-Catholics. Of course, I was upset about you judging
me, but that didn't stop the wily despot in your mirror. What is this
you are telling me now about who is my judge?

Did you see the postings of your fellow Jesuit Antichrist Andrew who
approached me immediately begging me to surrender to Christ just
because I have respect for human life and he and his buddies posting
here don't?

Here now come the talent of blasphemy from the power containing the
names of blaphemy. Antichrist Cindy is also going to teach us
scripture she has already profoundly disregarded and spit upon:

> Rom 14:7 For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.
> Rom 14:8 For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we
> die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's.
> Rom 14:9 For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he
> might be Lord both of the dead and living.
> Rom 14:10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at
> nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of
> Christ.
> Rom 14:11 For it is written, [As] I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall
> bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
> Rom 14:12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
> Rom 14:13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this
> rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in [his]
> brother's way.
>
> In His Grace,
> Cindy

I really didn't know Antichrist Cindy. After I caught Ted Seeber
condemning all non-Catholics and demonstrated the great mistake he
made right in the middle of the climate of September 11, then
Antichrist Cindy and her friends approached me telling me how God
showed them I was mean and in want of love. She has already told me
that I cannot tell the world how she thinks after she has been telling
the world for me how I think.

Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 30, 2002, 8:37:30 PM3/30/02
to
con...@iserve.net (Donna Conard) wrote in message news:<c8675604.02033...@posting.google.com>...

Dear Antichrist Donna:

Did you understand that a man here condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death? If you cannot see that, but you can condemn
someone else you hate, then yes, you are also a worker for the
Antichrist. If you can see insults but cannot see a man condemning
the lives of others, then yes you are workers for the Antichrist just
because it is true.

> When we truly love Him, we will love ALL of our
> fellowman.

Dear Antichrist Donna:

Did you understand that a man here condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death? If you cannot see that, but you can condemn
someone else you hate, then yes, you are also a worker for the
Antichrist. If you can see insults but cannot see a man condemning
the lives of others, then yes you are workers for the Antichrist just
because it is true.


> We will hear the Lord's voice through the Holy Spirit when
> we read scripture and when He speaks to us in person and we will
> follow and do and say what He tells us to. And, as you say, then we
> will be advancing His cause and His kingdom.
>
> In His awesome love,
>
> Donna

Dear Antichrist Donna:

Did you understand that a man here condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death? If you cannot see that, but you can condemn
someone else you hate, then yes, you are also a worker for the
Antichrist. If you can see insults but cannot see a man condemning
the lives of others, then yes you are workers for the Antichrist just
because it is true.


Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Nicholas II

unread,
Mar 30, 2002, 11:22:54 PM3/30/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> "Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message
news:<3ca295b1$2...@news.nntpserver.com>...
> > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> > news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...


...snip


Ted, your fruits are evident. You are now attempting to get me to "debate"
with you IN FRONT OF CATHOLICS so as to generate discord among brethren as
well as make it appear the true Christian church can no longer get along
with each other, so why bother with them. (I am not of Ted's church) In so
doing this will cause many Catholics to think our faith is useless because
we fight amongst ourselves. I will have no part of your hatred Ted. I will
not allow you to slam Jesus, His Truth, or those He has called to preach and
share with Catholics the world over. After reading your emails... NG
posts... and forum comments on your site I am convinced you are a Jesuit
sent to destroy the evangelistic methods of Heaven upon the roman Catholic
children.

Now do you understand why I opted NOT to help you when you asked me to help
you in your SDA Forum in the beginning? I had "discernment" you were NOT
genuine then.

I am now convinced!

You sir are a CATHOLIC JESUIT. Of this I have absolutely no doubt.

I will no longer waste my time with you Ted, for it is written... 1Timothy
6:3-5 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words,
[even] the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is
according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about
questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil
surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of
the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.

I withdraw myself from you and from commenting to you. I will not read your
posts, emails, or forum comments.

For those of you reading this post please understand that I am on to Ted,
and all of you that are helping him fight this hellish battle. Ted McMillian
is NOT a Seventh Day Adventist by any stretch of the imagination! He is a
Catholic through and through. Of this I am sure. He is sent to make the SDA
church look as if it is evil. Many Catholics that read Ted's posts
declare... "SEE HOW EVIL THESE SDA'S ARE!?!?!" when they read Ted's posts.
That is truly the ONLY fruit I see coming from Ted's posts. Not a single
person has come forward to say his posts have opened their eyes to Rome.
Instead, many have declared their eyes closed to the "Remnant of God"
because of the way Ted portrays them.

We are wise to Ted and his obvious agenda. You cannot lie to the Holy Spirit
people! So please pray for him to repent! That's all you can do now.

My suggestion to those that are being attacked by Ted. IGNORE HIM. Do NOT
respond to his posts and attacks against you. If you are a Catholic, I
suggest you ignore him as well. He is NOT representing Jesus Christ in his
actions. So, simply ignore him folks. He is harmless as a fly. The weakest
saint on his knees is far more powerful than Satan and all his demons!

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 31, 2002, 10:50:42 AM3/31/02
to
"Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message news:<3ca68c5d$1...@news.teranews.com>...

> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > "Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message
> news:<3ca295b1$2...@news.nntpserver.com>...
> > > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> > > news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
>
>
> ...snip
>
>
> Ted, your fruits are evident. You are now attempting to get me to "debate"
> with you IN FRONT OF CATHOLICS so as to generate discord among brethren as
> well as make it appear the true Christian church can no longer get along
> with each other, so why bother with them.


Dear Antichrist Nick,


I can show you people claiming to be Adventists even in leadership
positions who have held Revelation seminars and exposed the
Antichrist. You are nothing new.

I have predicted your behavior. You chose to attack me telling me
that "OBVIOUS" I am sending in hate postings against a highly
unscrupulous person by the name of Vatican Cindy. I have predicted
that you will not deal with the evidence against you and the evidence
even against Cindy. I have foretold that you will not touch Ted
Seeber, as Vatican Cindy didn't, who condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death. I have predicted that you will play the
Jesuit. One of the things I predicted within myself was, because of
your railing accusation, you will begin to, like Antichrist Cindy,
trail my postings.

Don't you worry about Ted McMillan Antichrist Nick. You have played
the Jesuit and made a railing accusation despite all your obvious
hate-postings against all Catholics. Deal with the evidence for the
crime you have committed. I don't want to hear more of your
unChristlike accusations without dealing with the evidence. I want to
know from you what Ted Seeber has done and how what he did relates to
your constant hate-postings against all Catholics that Rome has not
changed. It was not my choice to enter in like the despot and accuse
Ted McMillan of making OBVIOUS hate-postings. Another despot has
chosen to move in for an attack and speak without allowing anyone to
differ.

> (I am not of Ted's church) In so
> doing this will cause many Catholics to think our faith is useless because
> we fight amongst ourselves.

Then why did you attack me and why are you now evading the evidence
and questions I give as the other workers of the antichrist? I have
been saying all along what a terrible infiltrating power Rome is.

> I will have no part of your hatred Ted.

You don't already. You hate non-Catholics already, for someone has
condemned them to death on this newsgroup. This coincides with your
obvious hate-postings against all Catholics telling us that Rome has
not changed. You are now in the first of your trail postings like
your fellow workers for the Antichrist here. I want an answer from you
Nick. No longer play the Jesuit. Answer the points here. It was not
my choice to attack me and make it look like Adventists are arguing
with each other just because you are not one.

Antichrist Nick: are you going to answer my questions or points? Or
will you continue to play the Jesuit before these people. I DEMAND AN
ANSWER!


> I will
> not allow you to slam Jesus, His Truth, or those He has called to preach and
> share with Catholics the world over.

But you will allow Ted Seeber to condemn all non-Catholics? You will
ignore the many saints who were put to death where Ted Seeber told us
it was good?

Now, show us that I slam Jesus and the truth just because I disagree
with you. The Pharisees asked Christ questions and Christ responded
in such a way that shut them up. Christ did not respond constantly
telling them they are evil as you and your Antichrist buddies have
while teaching others not to attack or accuse. Now, for the sake of
your IQ, ANSWER THE QUESTION. I DEMAND IT and I DON'T WANT TO HEAR
MORE OF YOUR HATE. Prove that you are right and deal with the
evidence and questions now.

> After reading your emails... NG
> posts... and forum comments on your site I am convinced you are a Jesuit
> sent to destroy the evangelistic methods of Heaven upon the roman Catholic
> children.

You work for Rome Nick.

After I have visited your site, I an convinced that you obviously
posted hate-posts against all Catholics.

> Now do you understand why I opted NOT to help you when you asked me to help
> you in your SDA Forum in the beginning?

Of course: YOU WORK FOR ROME!

> I had "discernment" you were NOT
> genuine then.

Like you have discernment that you cannot possibly answer my
questions, so you must attack me while preaching against making
attacks as the other workers for the Antichrist here. I want to cut
it short and give you a chance to show that you deal with evidence and
are not skilled in evasion as your brothers and sisters of the Pope
here. Are you going to deal with the evidence Antichrist Nick? I
will expose you as that till you do things the way Christ did.

Now, shut me up with evidence and not your accusations while preaching
against it. START NOW!

> I am now convinced!
>
> You sir are a CATHOLIC JESUIT. Of this I have absolutely no doubt.

Another accusation. Nick promises not to accept my hatred? Now is it
that a CATHOLIC JESUIT can constantly scream about a man who has
condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death and he is the
Catholic Jesuit and the other who are even trying to smother out what
was done are not?

I will have no part of your hate and accusations while preaching
against it Antichrist Nick!

> I will no longer waste my time with you Ted, for it is written... 1Timothy
> 6:3-5 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words,
> [even] the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is
> according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about
> questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil
> surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of
> the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.


Nicky,

If I say I am unloving and hateful I will be a liar like unto you!

You are of your father the devil and the lust of your father ye will
do. He was a murderer from the beginning. When he speaketh a lie he
speaketh his own for he is a liar and the father of it.

> I withdraw myself from you and from commenting to you. I will not read your
> posts, emails, or forum comments.

THERE IS A PROBLEM HERE ANTICHRIST NICKY! The people are watching
here. YOU ARE WITHDRAWING AFTER MAKING ACCUSATIONS AND AFTER EVADING
ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS I HAVE BROUGHT TO YOU JUST LIKE ANTICHRIST
CINDY AND THE REST OF THEM. As you talk to me about being Christlike
and what Christ would have done, I ask you again what Christ did when
he met far more innocent people called THE PHARISEES. He popped in,
accused them and when they asked Him questions, He also played the
Jesuit?

> For those of you reading this post please understand that I am on to Ted,
> and all of you that are helping him fight this hellish battle. Ted McMillian
> is NOT a Seventh Day Adventist by any stretch of the imagination!

I will have all you to understand that while Nick is doing and saying
these things, he is preaching against making accusations. He is
speaking as if he knows Ted McMillan. He is telling you what to
think. According to the other workers of the Antichrist, Nick has
obviously been posting hate-posts against all Catholics. You need to
decide and ignore the coercive words against me as he works to accuse
AND NOT TO ANSWER OR DEAL WITH THE EVIDENCE. He is doing what the
other workers of the Antichrist have done as I predicted he would and
must.

> He is a
> Catholic through and through. Of this I am sure. He is sent to make the SDA
> church look as if it is evil.

Nick is actually describing what he is doing. I speak with you all
now to tell you you need not be confused. All Nick has to do is what
I asked him to do: DEAL WITH THE EVIDENCE. He is covering this over
with all his sermons against making accusations.

> Many Catholics that read Ted's posts
> declare... "SEE HOW EVIL THESE SDA'S ARE!?!?!"

Have many Catholics been reading Nick's posts? How could he use these
accusations against me?

> when they read Ted's posts.
> That is truly the ONLY fruit I see coming from Ted's posts. Not a single
> person has come forward to say his posts have opened their eyes to Rome.

Neither have I seen such posts about him. Neither will anyone come
forward to Nick to say he has come forward. Any who wants to come
forward to Nick's sermons against accusations with what he is doing
here, go right ahead, and good luck.

> Instead, many have declared their eyes closed to the "Remnant of God"
> because of the way Ted portrays them.

I have heard many say just the opposite. I can't help it if many
people told Nick these things while in Jesuit class.

> We are wise to Ted and his obvious agenda.

Yes, as the other workers of the Antichrist have said: Nick obviously
posts hate-postings against all Catholics.

> You cannot lie to the Holy Spirit
> people!

Right, you are not Jesuits. Nick can.

> So please pray for him to repent! That's all you can do now.

No, come and post against making accusations like Nick and the other
workers of the Antichrist have. Attack Ted McMillan that way and you
will be sure to win him over. Isn't that the sane thing to do as told
us and shown us by the workers of the Antichrist here?

> My suggestion to those that are being attacked by Ted. IGNORE HIM.

AFTER ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS, unless of course you have better sense.

> Do NOT
> respond to his posts and attacks against you.

Don't make the mistake Nick has and don't acquire his talent for
preaching and then disregarding in the midst of all that preaching.

> If you are a Catholic, I
> suggest you ignore him as well. He is NOT representing Jesus Christ in his
> actions.

No wonder the person who told the far more innocent Pharisees that
they were liars was crucified. "Teddy McMillan" had the same thoughts
as Antichrist Nick. Take a look at the following post-headers written
by Antichrist Lamarr as he also is paranoid about being accused, but
has an unbounded talent at doing it:

http://groups.google.com/groups?num=25&hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&start=275

What is your comment about this Antichrist Nick? Nevermind!

> So, simply ignore him folks. He is harmless as a fly.

Strange that the other workers of the Antichrist did not say this.
They said I was dangerous and they showed it by their preoccupation
with me. I dared to be upset at a man who condemned all non-Catholics
to death. That is sure to cause terror among the people who murdered
many such before and are preparing to murder others.

> The weakest
> saint on his knees is far more powerful than Satan and all his demons!

In one way I am proving that now. Nick, the man who asked questions
of the workers of the Antichrist and was in return called names and
insulted. He is now being asked questions he cannot and will not deal
with. Already telling us that case is closed with nothing left but
his hateful accusations and his obvious hate-postings against all
Catholics!

> "Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and shew my people
> their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins." -Isaiah 58:1

Spare me this hypocritical garble, Antichrist Nicholas.


> Truth is truth.
> ...Nicholas


Can you answer truth when it comes to you? Better do it differently
than all the other workers of the Antichrist!


Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

bam

unread,
Mar 31, 2002, 12:16:03 PM3/31/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote

> Dear Antichrist Nick,
>
>
> I can show you people claiming to be Adventists even in leadership
> positions who have held Revelation seminars and exposed the
> Antichrist. You are nothing new.

Can't you anti-Catholics learn to work together?

BAM


Francis Lapeyre

unread,
Mar 31, 2002, 4:33:31 PM3/31/02
to

"bam" <b...@digital.net> wrote in message news:uaeifp7...@corp.supernews.com...

Their puerile [Nickie: look it up; i.e., learn to use a dictionary] behavior toward each other, not to mention toward Catholics and the Church, reminds me of two of my cats. They can't stand each other, and get into hissing and growling matches whenever one encroaches upon another's space. But that's normal for cats, for humans, who are [mostly] equipped with a moral concience, such behavior is not the norm.

You two guys need a good scratching post.

Yet more proof that the Bible cannot interpret itself. Either the Holy Spirit is falling down on the job [by interpreting Revelation differently for each of them], or the Catholic Church's Traditions and teachings are correct. The former cannot be true, if you believe in an omnipotent God, therefore, it follows that we need the Catholic Church to guide us. QED.

--

Regards,
Francis Lapeyre

"Facilius est camelum per foramen acus transire quam divitem intrare in regnum Dei."
(Mk 10:25)

Return address is filtered via SpamCop.


Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 31, 2002, 5:10:27 PM3/31/02
to
"bam" <b...@digital.net> wrote in message news:<uaeifp7...@corp.supernews.com>...

I am still dealing with the same issue: An Ant-Protestant by the name
of Ted Seeber condemned the lives of all non-Catholics. HE DIDN'T
CALL THEM NAMES! He condemned their lives. That would logically mean
that Nick's life is in jeopardy also, but Nick also has Vatican
disease and it will be much pulling of teeth to even cause or force
him to make a singular comment. He also likely will not answer for us
the solution to this strange phenomenon.

However, Bam was not around when Ted Seeber gave a prime example of
Anti-Protestism. He condemned the LIVES of non-Catholics and told us
even in the year 2001 that they deserve persecution and death. That
is not to be compared to what Bam tells us is Anti-Catholic behavior.

Heaven is a straight place that cannot be fooled by the workers of the
Antichrist. Even on earth to this day, the majority believe that it
is better to survive names being hurled at you than to be persecuted
horribly and then put to death. Antichrist Nick, Cindy, Lamarr and
the others actually believe that also. Just tell them to trade their
history for the present and allow us to hire criminals to torture and
put them to death. In exchange, they can call us names.


For the Work Finished!

Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com

Ted McMillan

unread,
Mar 31, 2002, 6:02:34 PM3/31/02
to
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/AntiJesM.htm

Caillean McMahon <cail...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<3CA27440...@yahoo.com>...
> billu wrote:
> >
> > Are you saying that Nicholas is a Vatican super terrorist? If so
> > please never utter the words, the poor man will probably
> > die straight away from a heart attack.
> >
> If a Witch can be a Vatical agent, I suppose that anyone can....sigh
> Brightest Blessings;
> Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt

Exactly right! And how about the fact that the worst shaking that is
ever going now is being performed upon us by Adventist leaders who
used to give some of the best Revelation seminars exposing the Papacy?
It is as if you think you never read the Jesuit oath?

But I don't look at that. I mean, how weird is it that a man can
condemn all non-Catholics, and all these claiming not to be Catholic
post friendly with their condemner and attack me for exposing and
correctin him. Is it everyday that even witches do that?

Antichrist Caillean: you are also condemned by Seeber's words. Your
IQ is also strange and not able to grasp that. Obviously you are also
a worker for the Antichrist, for you did find something to attack and
accuse of hatred. You found me. The man who even condemned all your
lives go free. That is because he really didn't condemn your lives.
You all are also Catholics.

Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Robert A. Walker

unread,
Apr 1, 2002, 4:43:51 PM4/1/02
to
"bam" <b...@digital.net> wrote in message news:<uaeifp7...@corp.supernews.com>...

I just wish they'd learn to not crosspost to groups, such as ARC-RC,
that don't care about their insane ramblings.

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 1, 2002, 6:55:20 PM4/1/02
to
mmsic...@cs.cominvalid (MMSICILIANA) wrote in message news:<20020331211940...@mb-cv.news.cs.com>...

> Nicholas wrote:
> <<Ted, your fruits are evident. You are now attempting to get me to "debate"
> with you IN FRONT OF CATHOLICS so as to generate discord among brethren as well
> as make it appear the true Christian church can no longer get along with each
> other, so why bother with them.>>
>
> As if we *needed* any proof that these two are not part of the "true Christian
> church"....

You mean the true church is staffed with people who think it nothing
that all non-Catholics have been condemned to persecution and death as
Ted Seeber has done? I think that the word "proof" has an opposite
meaning when mentioned by the workers of the Antichrist.

> Nicholas wrote:
> << In so doing this will cause many Catholics to think our faith is useless
> because
> we fight amongst ourselves. >>
>

> We already knew Nicholas' type of "faith" is useless, because the Scriptures
> tell us that the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, kindness, gentleness,
> and self control. These are characteristics that Nicholas does not exhibit in
> his posts.

Does the Holy Spirit also tell us to get concerned and tell the world
that "pictures can be faked" when we exposed the atrocities of the
Ustashis of WWII? They were the very most satanic murderers of the
20th century! MSiciliana was just one who defended them. Of course,
she babbles that she didn't.

> Nicholas wrote:
> <<Now do you understand why I opted NOT to help you when you asked me to help
> you in your SDA Forum in the beginning?>>
>

> LOL!!! As if these two haven't been in cahoots from day one! They have the
> exact same "true" story on both of their websites. It's obvious from the
> "literary style" ;-) that Ted McMillan wrote this story. Nicholas has placed
> it verbatim on his website and has claimed it was mailed "anonymously" to him,
> and that he (Nicholas) changed the names and the places to "protect the
> innocent." But, if you check out the two sites I've posted below, you'll see
> that the "stories" are exactly the same, right down to the "changed" names and
> places! LOL!!!!

It's obvious that MSiciliana works for the Antichrist. Remember: she
said it's obvious that "pictures can be faked" if you ever dare to
expose the atrocities of the Catholic Ustashis of WWII.


MSiciliana tries to prove that Nick and myself are one. She writes a
portion of an article called "Sensible People":

> to the Vatican to plead with the Catholic dignitaries there how they can be
> trained to become "as horrible as they are."
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> And this is Ted McMillan's site:
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/SensiblePeople.htm
>
> Check it out.

MSiciliana posts exactly like "Teddy McMillan." She posts exactly
like Dr. Patti, who is also toxically unscrupulous, falsely claims to
be non-Catholic and constantly attacks the Adventist Church on the
Adventist forums. She always claims that we must have freedom to
think differently and freely, but she also demands that the Adventist
Church must change and surrender her ideas so that she can unite with
all the other churches. This uniting is under YOU KNOW WHO!

According to Antichrist MSiciliana, it doesn't matter if posts are
similar when it comes to her. That doesn't prove anything.

Paul

unread,
Apr 1, 2002, 9:03:29 PM4/1/02
to
I just wish they'd learn not to post.

Paul

"Robert A. Walker" <rwa...@nycc.edu> wrote in message
news:8d9ab0cb.02040...@posting.google.com...

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 2, 2002, 12:04:32 AM4/2/02
to
rwa...@nycc.edu (Robert A. Walker) wrote in message news:<8d9ab0cb.02040...@posting.google.com>...

Titanic issues are being discussed here friend! Ever heard of Nick
accusing another of posting hate-postings? Then there is the issue of
blood with Ted Seeber condemning all non-Catholics to persecution and
death after he already submitted every argument against liberty,
freedom and the American Constitution! That is just what the
Communists and Nazis did.

There is even the issue of every non-Catholic here except Ted McMillan
treating it as nothing that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death. Antichrist Cindy attacked me from day one till
now. She claims she is apologizing yet her posts and attitude is just
exactly the same as always. Still she says nothing about what Ted
Seeber has done. Still we have to pull teeth for her to notice
crucial issues before her eyes. Still when questions are asked her,
she evades them and then when pushed, answers part and commands that
the rest of the questions be closed.

All of these are crucial issues that definitely relate to Catholicism.
You all can ignore them if you're not interested.

Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Apr 2, 2002, 7:44:58 AM4/2/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02033...@posting.google.com...

> "Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message
news:<3ca68c5d$1...@news.teranews.com>...
> > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> > news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > > "Nicholas II" <nich...@localline2.com> wrote in message
> > news:<3ca295b1$2...@news.nntpserver.com>...
> > > > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in
message
> > > > news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> >
> >
> > ...snip
> >
> >
> > Ted, your fruits are evident. You are now attempting to get me to
"debate"
> > with you IN FRONT OF CATHOLICS so as to generate discord among
brethren as
> > well as make it appear the true Christian church can no longer get
along
> > with each other, so why bother with them.
>
>
> Dear Antichrist Nick,
>
>
> I can show you people claiming to be Adventists even in leadership
> positions who have held Revelation seminars and exposed the
> Antichrist. You are nothing new.
>
> I have predicted your behavior. You chose to attack me telling me
> that "OBVIOUS" I am sending in hate postings against a highly
> unscrupulous person by the name of Vatican Cindy.

Is that her legal name Ted?

Cindy, if you are reading this, interesting choice of a legal name, did
your parents name you Vatican? do you prefer to go by Vatican or Cindy?

Doug

unread,
Apr 2, 2002, 4:10:07 PM4/2/02
to
>There is even the issue of every non-Catholic here except Ted McMillan
>treating it as nothing that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to
>persecution and death.

So are you claiming that every non-Catholic, and every Catholic, except you, is
a Vatican infiltrator, and the anti-Christ?

Doug

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 2, 2002, 4:24:50 PM4/2/02
to
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3ca9a7ca$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...

In heaven it is! Right Ustashi Nordy?

> Cindy, if you are reading this, interesting choice of a legal name, did
> your parents name you Vatican? do you prefer to go by Vatican or Cindy?

Her actions indeed show that is what she prefers. Who else would
normally ignore someone who condemned all non-Catholics to death and
attack only the person who reproved him? Can you find them in the
Arab world cheering on Osama Bin Laden? You can't even find them
there.

Ted McMillan

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 2, 2002, 5:08:20 PM4/2/02
to
"St. Elsewhere" <x...@aol.com> wrote in message news:<FX8q8.523974$pN4.37...@bin8.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>...
> "MMSICILIANA" <mmsic...@cs.cominvalid> wrote in message
> news:20020331211940...@mb-cv.news.cs.com...

>
> >
> > LOL!!! As if these two haven't been in cahoots from day one! They have
> the
> > exact same "true" story on both of their websites. It's obvious from the
> > "literary style" ;-) that Ted McMillan wrote this story. Nicholas has
> placed
> > it verbatim on his website and has claimed it was mailed "anonymously" to
> him,
> > and that he (Nicholas) changed the names and the places to "protect the
> > innocent." But, if you check out the two sites I've posted below, you'll
> see
> > that the "stories" are exactly the same, right down to the "changed" names
> and
> > places! LOL!!!!
> >
> Doesn't all shit look & smell the same?

You know well you were going to comment about the taste to!

Me personally, I wear deodorant.

I was looking for posts that challenge and present evidence, instead
your minds was also St. Elsewhere!


Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com

St. Elsewhere

unread,
Apr 2, 2002, 6:47:43 PM4/2/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
I would leave that up to people who kiss you to tell us.

>
> Me personally, I wear deodorant.
>
> I was looking for posts that challenge and present evidence, instead
> your minds was also St. Elsewhere!
That was almost clever. Give you 4 on the clever meter
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
>


Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Apr 3, 2002, 8:34:00 AM4/3/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
Actually, according to the Bible, her name in heaven, would be something
similar to "my beloved child, Cindy"... certainly not Vatican Cindy.

Still namecalling Ted... how very unchristian of you.

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 3, 2002, 1:15:17 PM4/3/02
to
Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not
condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001. I have brought up
issues to prove that he did exactly that, but there is a certain bent
a person's IQ would take when he or she works for the Antichrist.
Here now again is the actual conversation and where you can find it
posted on the newsgroups. Here is the evidence every worker for the
Antichrist, be they sabbathkeepers or even witches, have ignored in
favor over their paranoia that uncivil posts are being submitted to
the newsgroups. Being workers for the Antichrist, their solution to
this problem was to submit more uncivil postings:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com

I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:

Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>

Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.

------------------

FREEZE!

In this simple statement, Ted Seeber acknowledges not only that
Catholics have persecuted and killed Protestants, but he states why.
He speaks clearly with approval as if he is expressing an eternal
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. I,
being infuriated, respond:

------------------

Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.

------------------

Ted Seeber was clearly telling the world that people deserve to die or
should even be persecuted and killed if they don't live the bible
according to his standards. My reply to him continues:

------------------

Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!

Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?

Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!

I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!

------------------

What I was saying here was that the Protestants viewed homosexual
behavior as intolerable and abominable. Likely most of the victims of
911 did not view matters that way. Since they likely did not live the
bible according to Seeber's standards, what should be their fate?

So here we see the issues and prove that Rome has not changed. These
statements of Seeber did not just come like a bolt of lightning. This
was the last leg of a series of emotional ramblings between us both as
I was defending human liberty, privacy and the American Constitution
while Seeber was condemning all of these and demanding change under
the false pretext that the terror attacks require a police state for
security. Seeber told us boldly that he works against the
Constitution to change it to be interpreted opposite from what it
currently is under "acceptable confines" from the INSIDE! This is
just what people like Jack Chick WERE SAYING FOLKS!!

Interestingly, although he was even telling us that privacy was
NOWHERE to be found in the American Constitution, go to his website
and you will find something strange. Would you like to have an email
account given to you by Ted Seeber? Well go to his website and you
can get one. What's more is, according to him, IT'S FREE! Want to
get a free email account from a man arguing against basic human
privacy? You go right ahead!

For a long time he was spitting upon the principles of human liberty
as had ALL those brutal regimes that easily took the lives of people
and committed atrocities. He even told me that the current American
system respecting privacy was "increibly stupid" and "outdated." He
told me the current principles were as old as Martin Luther during the
Reformation. When I asked him the date his contrary principles were
created, he behaved just like Antichrist MSiciliana, Cindy, Nicholas
and so many others.

You can view this evidence in much of the war that took place between
Ted Seeber and myself on the following webpage:

http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm

After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
that on the newsgroups directly in the climate of September 11th
fulfilling the stated definition of a terrorist, Ted Seeber ducked out
from dialoguing with me even though he had been trailing my postings
and wrangling with me tit-for-tat.

I then kept raving and raving about what Ted Seeber had said. NONE OF
THE OTHER WORKERS FOR THE ANTICHRIST DARED TO TAKE NOTICE OVER WHAT
TED SEEBER HAD SAID OR DONE. They came to attack me telling me that I
insulted the man, and I therefore was an "incomprehensible" and "evil"
man sending in uncivil postings. Antichrist Lamarr told us that I was
not human as I dared to respect the lives of millions of men, women
and little children who were not just ordinary people, but were the
very saints of God! All of them attacked me taking turns and telling
the world I am the only problem on the newsgroups. Through this we
discover that Rome has not changed. It shows they are not to use the
claim that Ted Seeber was not representing Rome here. His words did
not offend them.

That is why you notice all claims that Seeber did not do what I said
he did, are just a squeak and from among the most unscrupulous of them
all, Antichrist MSiciliana. I have told Antichrist MSiciliana to LET
THE MAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF many times over. The advice sounds logical,
does it NOT? From day one, TED SEEBER COULD NOT DENY WHAT I HAD SAID
ABOUT WHAT HE HAD DONE. FROM DAY ONE HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT MY
CLAIMS AGAINST WHAT HE HAD DONE. He had been posting on the
newsgroups for almost two months afterward and then ducked out at the
end of January.

Just like Antichrist MSiciliana was the only one trying to show the
world I taught that Ellen White was the Antichrist, so she is the only
one now trying to babble to us that Ted Seeber did not boldly condemn
the lives of all non-Catholics on the basis of Vatican principle!

Although Antichrist MSiciliana claims that Ted Seeber did not condemn
all non-Catholics, with all my ravings about what was done, she is the
only one unscrupulous enough to claim Seeber did not do it. All the
rest of them acknowledge that he did. The Pope should give Antichrist
MSiciliana an award or elect her the next pope!

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Apr 3, 2002, 1:18:30 PM4/3/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...

Stick to topic Ted. St. Elsewhere hasn't mentioned anyone but YOUR
behavior...

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 3, 2002, 5:01:29 PM4/3/02
to

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 3, 2002, 5:13:12 PM4/3/02
to
"St. Elsewhere" <x...@aol.com> wrote in message news:<zqrq8.163672$7b.16...@bin7.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>...

Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 3, 2002, 10:47:38 PM4/3/02
to
Antichrist Will Nordy wrote:

"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3cab04c8$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...

> Actually, according to the Bible, her name in heaven, would be something
> similar to "my beloved child, Cindy"... certainly not Vatican Cindy.
>
> Still namecalling Ted... how very unchristian of you.


Well I feel like you guys sometimes! If you're still unscrupulous and
still works for the Antichrist, why be ashamed of your occupation?

Here is the evidence we have been waiting for exposing your fellow
super-terrorist from the Antichrist, Ted Seeber condemning all
non-Catholics to death:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com

------------------

FREEZE!

principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!

Will Nordmeyer

unread,
Apr 4, 2002, 9:08:09 AM4/4/02
to

"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.0204...@posting.google.com...

> Antichrist Will Nordy wrote:
>
> "Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
news:<3cab04c8$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
>
> > Actually, according to the Bible, her name in heaven, would be
something
> > similar to "my beloved child, Cindy"... certainly not Vatican
Cindy.
> >
> > Still namecalling Ted... how very unchristian of you.
>
>
> Well I feel like you guys sometimes!
You feel Christian? You don't show it Ted.


> If you're still unscrupulous and
> still works for the Antichrist, why be ashamed of your occupation?
>

Haven't started working for the antichrist.

Snipped the non-relevant garbage about Ted Seeber and/or MSiciliana. I
didn't really read it, since it wasn't relevant.


Come on Ted. STICK TO topic. The topic is your namecalling. Not
things that Ted Seeber may/may not have meant. Not what MSiciliana
may/may not have said. Not what you claim they meant by what they said.

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 4, 2002, 5:36:20 PM4/4/02
to
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3cac5e49$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...

> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.0204...@posting.google.com...
> > Antichrist Will Nordy wrote:
> >
> > "Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
> news:<3cab04c8$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
> >
> > > Actually, according to the Bible, her name in heaven, would be
> something
> > > similar to "my beloved child, Cindy"... certainly not Vatican
> Cindy.
> > >
> > > Still namecalling Ted... how very unchristian of you.
> >
> >
> > Well I feel like you guys sometimes!
> You feel Christian? You don't show it Ted.
>
>
> > If you're still unscrupulous and
> > still works for the Antichrist, why be ashamed of your occupation?
> >
> Haven't started working for the antichrist.

It is obvious that you are well skilled already working for the
Antichrist and is a veteran.

> Snipped the non-relevant garbage about Ted Seeber and/or MSiciliana. I
> didn't really read it, since it wasn't relevant.

Perfect despot! It's a pitty you don't stand out in that among your
comrade workers of the Antichrist. I mean I saw not the slightest
shred of evidence for anything. No form of intelligence or IQ can
persuade you to use evidence for your points.

> Come on Ted. STICK TO topic. The topic is your namecalling.

Yes to the workers of the Antichrist, there will be a concern if
someone points out the murders and atrocities they commit. He now
despots to us that our concern should not be the murders of millions
and the attitudes that caused them which still exists: he tells us the
issue and concern is his Vatican paranoia about name-calling. Why be
concerned about that if he himself namecalls? He is a worker for the
antichrist.

> Not
> things that Ted Seeber may/may not have meant. Not what MSiciliana
> may/may not have said. Not what you claim they meant by what they said.

What they have said is the issue. Let me help with this giving the
evidence. Your concern is against namecalling lest super-criminals
are exposed. My concern is the super-criminals and the blood that
they shed. As I have just against seen a documentation of your
Holocause of WWII, their top weapon they used to finally destroy the
bodies and lives of people was DECEIT. Here therefore is again the
evidence that strikes like holy water against the workers of the
Antichrist. We are going to see Antichrist Seeber condemning all
non-Catholics. You choose whether or not this issue of blood or lives
is more important than the paranoia of Antichrist Nordy:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com

------------------

FREEZE!

I, being infuriated, respond:

------------------

------------------

------------------

------------------

http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm

For the Work Finished!

>
>
>

Ted McMillan

unread,
Apr 4, 2002, 8:56:49 PM4/4/02
to
Edward Curtis <cur...@labyrinth.net> wrote in message news:<MPG.171595351...@news.labyrinth.net>...
> In article <20020403220131...@mb-mf.news.cs.com>, MMSICILIANA
> says...
> > In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,

> > tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
> >
> > >Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not
> > >condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001.
> >
> > What did I tell you? Again, paranoid Ted McMillan sends out more spam thinking
> > that if he just deluges us with his garbage, some of it might stick. And
> > again, he's wrong--as usual. So, get ready for another rant.
>
> MM,
> If you feed the troll, you must take it home. :-)
>
> Edward

Dear Eduardo,


Why the advice? Who is going to listen to you?'

Your fellow workers of the Antichrist are smart. They know better
than to listen to you, and you know better than to listen to yourself!

Here is the evidence again. A man condemns all non-Catholics. You
all, being children of the Antichrist also, ignore what the man does.
Obviously you all think the same:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com

------------------

FREEZE!

principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!

I, being infuriated, respond:

0 new messages