The information in this article applies to:
Microsoft Win32 Application Programming Interface (API)
for Windows NT and Win95, version 4.00
I tried the code on Windows NT 4.0 (SP 4), and it worked. So is
LR_LOADFROMFILE supported on Windows NT4.0 also, may be the support
was added in some service pack OR is the documentation of LoadImage
wrong. Please explain!!
Shoaib
--
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>The documentation of LoadImage method states that on Windows NT
>LR_LOADFROMFILE is not supported. The sample code given in
>knowledge base article Q158898 uses LaodImage with LR_LOADFROMFILE
>option. Article Q158898 also states that
>
> The information in this article applies to:
>
> Microsoft Win32 Application Programming Interface (API)
> for Windows NT and Win95, version 4.00
>
>I tried the code on Windows NT 4.0 (SP 4), and it worked. So is
>LR_LOADFROMFILE supported on Windows NT4.0 also, may be the support
>was added in some service pack OR is the documentation of LoadImage
>wrong. Please explain!!
>
The documentation on LoadImage is out of date, It is fully supported
on NT 4 onwards, Windows 95 Build 950 (Original release), NT 3.51
SP5, Windows 98 and Windows 2000 / NT 5 (Any build).
Regards,
'''
@ @
+========================ooO-(_)-Ooo================================+
| PJ Naughter |
| |
| Software Developer Home Email: p...@indigo.ie |
| Softech Telecom Work Email: pj.na...@softech-telecom.com |
| Web: http://indigo.ie/~pjn |
| ICQ: 25413168 |
| |
+===================================================================+
The information in this article applies to:
Microsoft Win32 Application Programming Interface (API)
for Windows NT and Win95, version 4.00
I tried the code on Windows NT 4.0 (SP 4), and it worked. So is
LR_LOADFROMFILE supported on Windows NT4.0 also, may be the support
was added in some service pack OR is the documentation of LoadImage
wrong. Please explain!!
Shoaib
reagds...
PJ Naughter wrote in message <36b5e40d...@NEWS.EUNET.IE>...
|On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:13:23 GMT, rsh...@usa.net wrote:
|